Defining Value in Sustainability PDF
Defining Value in Sustainability PDF
Defining Value in Sustainability PDF
Sustainability
Informing Design Through Economic Analysis
Speakers
2. Define why you need a business case for sustainable building designs
3. Identify when you should use the Informing Design LEED pilot credits
2
Roadmap for the Course
3
The Changing Landscape of Sustainability in Buildings
4
LEED Credit Categories
Innovation
Water
Efficiency Sustainable
Sites
Defining
Sustainability in
Materials
the Built &
Resources
5
Buildings, Carbon & Climate Change
The urban built environment is responsible for 75% of annual global GHG emissions: buildings alone
account for 39%. - Architecture 2030
6
The Carbon Story for Buildings
7
Federal Regulations & Building Decarbonization
8
Regulations at the State, County, City Levels
9
Green Certified Buildings in the Building Stock
10
Why You Need a Business Case for
Sustainable Building Designs
11
We Know Sustainable Buildings Improve
12
So Why Do You Need a Business Case?
13
Business Cases Allow Teams to Compare & Justify
Options Throughout the Project
Design
Metrics Value
Data/Strategies
Energy
Financial Environmental Quantify as-built impacts
Water
Lifecycle costs Operational CO2
ROI, Payback, etc. Air pollution
Materials Utility savings Embodied CO2
Achieve 2 LEED points
etc. etc.
14
Common Business Case Frameworks
• Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA)
15
Life-Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA)
Evaluates the total financial cost of an asset by assessing initial costs and
discounted future expenditures, such as operations, and maintenance, and
replacement over the service life of the asset
16
Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA)
17
Triple Bottom Line – Cost Benefit Analysis (TBL-CBA)
Answers the question “Which project alternative provides the best bang for
the buck, in total and by stakeholder group?”
18
Financial Impacts: Tip of the Iceberg
19
Economic Impacts: Below the Surface
20
See the Whole Picture
21
Real World Example
22
Questions TBL-CBA Can Help Answer
23
Business Case Metrics
Net Present Value (NPV)
➢ The net value of an investment, calculated as benefits less costs, with
both expressed in present-value monetary terms
➢ Gives scale of value for project alternatives
Benefit to Cost Ratio (BCR)
➢ The overall “value for money” of a project, expressed as the
ratio of the benefits of a project relative to its costs, with
both expressed in present-value monetary terms
➢ If BCR >1.0, then ‘value for money’.
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
➢ The IRR finds the discout rate that would make NPV = 0, if
the current discount rate is lower than IRR the project has
an NPV > 0 24
LEED Pilot Credits for Informing Design
25
Informing Design LEED Pilot Credits
26
Informing Design by Major Credit Category Using Triple
Bottom Line Analysis - INpc122
INTENT:
To demonstrate the economic, social, and environmental value of LEED
design strategies related to major LEED credit categories, using empirical
evidence to inform the design process through TBL-CBA
REQUIREMENT:
Conduct a TBL-CBA on at least two LEED credits in two LEED credit
categories
27
Informing Design Using Triple Bottom Line Analysis -
SSpc113
INTENT:
To demonstrate the economic, social, and environmental value of LEED
design strategies for specific LEED credits. Must include: Indoor Water Use
Reduction, Outdoor Water Use Reduction & Optimized Energy Performance
REQUIREMENT:
Identify the financial, social, and environmental value of at least six LEED
credits in aggregate, in any credit category
28
Additional Information
● If applying for both pilot credits, you need to use 10 unique credits, the
overlapping ones will only count towards one
● Must also include the monetized value for at least five social or
environmental costs or benefits e.g. reduced air pollution or water use
29
Sources of Information
● The White House – Office of Management and Budget
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/regulatory_matters_pdf/a-
4.pdf (Pg. 14 onwards)
● US Environmental Protection Agency
http://www.epa.gov/sustainability/analytics/benefit-cost.htm
● Treasury Board of Canada
https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/rtrap-parfa/analys/analys-eng.pdf
● US Department of Transportation
http://www.dot.gov/tiger/guidance
● Federal Aviation Administration
http://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/bc_analysis/
● Federal Emergency Management Agency
http://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/18870
● US Army
http://asafm.army.mil/Documents/OfficeDocuments/CostEconomics/guidances/cba-
gd.pdf 30
The Indeed Tower Case Study
31
Indeed Tower:
Pursing rigor to measure impact
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
The Realities of the Business Case for Sustainable
Buildings
46
Disconnect Between Business Case and Reality
Study Data Set Effect Effect Size
UK BCIS database
Chegut et. al. (2019) Project cost 6.5% cost premium
(~18,000 buildings)
47
48
World Green Building Trends 2021
49
50
51
Business Cases In Application: Studio City Gym
Project Details
General Information
Client: City of LA + BuroHappold
Size: 12,000 sq ft
Building type: Recreation Center
Location: Los Angeles, California
52
Business Cases In Application: Studio City Gym
53
Business Cases In Application: Studio City Gym
Key Metrics
TBL-CBA Outcomes
Financial Return on
229.3%
Investment
54
Business Cases In Application: Studio City Gym
7,187
Acres of forest in one year
932
Homes of electricity use
for one year
$214,000
Societal benefit
55
THANK YOU