OTS Scheme 2012
OTS Scheme 2012
OTS Scheme 2012
This policy will cover all the accounts of the borrowers/defaulters of HSIIDC which were classified as
NPA accounts that have become doubtful or loss as on 31.3.2008. The policy would also cover NPAs
classified as Sub-standard as on 31.3.2008 which have subsequently become doubtful or loss assets.
For the purpose of determining eligibility, the NPA definition would be as per the guidelines of RBI
applicable upto the year ending March 31, 2008. Accordingly, NPA means non performing asset
account where interest and/or installment of principal remain overdue for more than 90 days. All
accounts where the age of default in installment of principal and/or interest is more than 90 days, the
account would be treated as NPA which could be either a sub-standard/doubtful/loss account in terms
of classification /guidelines of RBI as prevailing on 31.3.2008, which is as under:
Likewise NPA definition for leasing accounts would be as per RBI guidelines as applicable for year
ending 31.3.2008.
i. This policy will be applicable to all NPA accounts irrespective of outstanding balance.
ii. The policy would also cover cases pertaining to bridge loans/loan availed against state
Subsidy, lease assistance, working capital terms loans, bridge loan against working capital &
corporate loans.
iii. The policy will also cover all accounts where the Corporation has taken action under section 29
of SFC’s Act, RC issued cases and also cases pending before Courts/DRT/BIFR. However, in
the cases which are pending before the Courts/DRT/BIFR, the borrower shall be required to
give an affidavit for withdrawal of the case or obtain consent decree from Court(s)/DRT/BIFR.
iv. The policy would also cover cases where the Corporation had approved settlement under any
of the ongoing schemes of the Corporation known as One Time Settlement
Scheme(OTS)/under RBI policy as adopted by HSIIDC provided the OTS has not fructified and
either the OTS has been withdrawn by HSIIDC or the validity period of the OTS has expired.
However, cases where OTS is in force, under any earlier policy, will not be eligible to be
official liquidator appointed and also the cases where BIFR has recommended for winding up of
the company.
vi. This policy shall not be applicable to wilful defaulters as per RBI guidelines which are detailed
hereunder:-
a. Deliberate non-payment of the dues despite adequate cash flow and good networth.
b. Siphoning off of funds to the detriment of the defaulting unit.
c. Assets financed have either not been purchased or have been sold and proceeds have
been mis-utilized.
d. Misrepresentation/falsification of record.
The RBI guidelines further state that the identification of the willful defaulters should be made keeping
in view the track record of the borrowers and should not be decided on the basis of isolated
The minimum amount that should be recovered under the policy in respect of compromise
settlement of NPAs classified as doubtful or loss as on March 31, 2008 would be 100% of the
outstanding balance in the account as on the date on which the account was categorized as
doubtful NPA.
b. NPAs classified as sub-standard as on March 31, 2008 which became doubtful or loss
subsequently.
The minimum amount that should be recovered in respect of NPAs classified as sub-standard
as on March 31, 2008 which became doubtful or loss subsequently would be 100% of amount
outstanding as on the date on which the account was categorized as doubtful NPA plus interest
@ 13.5% p.a (floating) from the cut-off date till the date of final payment.
i. In lease finance cases, the minimum amount recoverable shall be based on the date
on which the account became doubtful or the date on which the assets of the unit
shall be the principal outstanding as on the cut off date as per the capital recovery
method plus the actual expenses incurred by the Corporation recoverable from the
party upto the date of settlement. The Corporation must restrict the watch and ward
as well as other expenses to the extent of interest (prevailing rate) on the principal
amount from the date, the amount became doubtful till the date of settlement.
ii. Further, in those cases of lease finance where the borrowers were given advances to
procure machinery, but the machinery was not procured due to mis-utilization of funds
and in such cases the date of default may be the date on which the amount was
advanced to the party and the corresponding cut off date for the purpose of calculation
of settlement amount may be taken two years after the date of disbursement.
iii. In all lease finance cases, the residual value may be recovered without interest. This
amount shall, however, be over and above the settlement approved, if any.
In cases where the lease accounts are settled under OTS policy, the sale consideration
will be 0.50% of the principal amount as per capital recovery method incorporated in
which any amount received from the borrower is appropriated first towards
miscellaneous expenses then towards interest and then towards principal shall not be
e. The term "cut off date" with reference to an account means the date on which the account was
last categorized as doubtful account and has continuously remained either as such or as a
combination of doubtful and loss account since that date.
f. The settlement amount as above would be the minimum acceptable amount. However, HSIIDC
could negotiate with the borrower to recover more than this amount keeping in view factors like
security and disposability of the assets.
4. PAYMENT TERMS
a. At the time of making application under this policy the borrowers will be required to deposit
amount equal to 10% of principal outstanding, in the account as up-front. The company shall
have option to pay the full OTS amount without any interest within 60 days from the date of
issue of letter.
Alternatively, an amount equal to 25% of the settlement amount shall be payable within one
month from the date of approval of settlement by the Corporation, (10% of the amount
deposited along with the application shall be adjusted against this demand). The balance 75%
of the settlement amount shall be paid within one year from the date of approval of settlement
adjusted towards the crystallized settlement amount provided that in no case the settlement
borrowers will be required to deposit amount equal to 10% of principal as per Capital
Recovery Method as on cut off date as up front. The modalities for balance payment in case of
5. SANCTIONING AUTHORITY
The Sub-committee constituted by the Board for approving OTS in dis-investment cases shall also be
the competent authority to take decision on the Compromise Settlement of Chronic Non-Performing
Assets as per the provisions of this policy. A quarterly report in respect of cases where OTS has been
done will be placed before the BOD for information. In case OTS is done outside the provisions of this
policy, the matter shall be placed before the Board of Directors for decision.
The settlement under this policy shall be without prejudice to any criminal liability that may arise due
The Board of Directors shall be competent authority to grant any relaxation in this policy on case to
case basis.
If any question arises relating to the interpretation of any of the provision of this policy, it shall be
referred to the Board of Directors of the Corporation for decision and the decision of the Board of
Directors of the Corporation shall be final.
• In the event, any of these conditions are not fructified, the benefit of this scheme will be
forfeited and the money received under this scheme shall be considered as if the same was
received in the normal course under the account.
• The Corporation shall have a final right to accept or reject any settlement proposal made
under this policy with or without assigning any reasons.
The Scheme will remain open upto 31.03.2013 for receipt of applications from borrowers.
The Second and Subsequent Charges are generally required by the clients in favour of Commercial
Banks against their working capital limits. The Client is required to comply with the following:
the bank ceding second charge against current assets in favour of HSIIDC is required;
charge on current assets in favour of HSIIDC, a tripartite agreement involving the company,
the HSIIDC and the concerned Bank is executed.
For release of security documents, there should not be any outstanding dues of the Corporation and
also the 'No Due Certificate' from the Institutions in whose favour the pari-passu charge/ second /
To recover its dues, Corporation takes over the assets mortgagged to it u/s 29 of SFC's
Act/Court/AAIFR/BIFR and sell them on 'As is Where is' basis. For information of interested parties the