Militant Nationalism - PDF 61dbbc6974871
Militant Nationalism - PDF 61dbbc6974871
Militant Nationalism - PDF 61dbbc6974871
MILITANT NATIONALISM
Introduction
The partition of Bengal in 1905 – a prime example of the British divide and
rule policy – acted as the catalyst for the growth of anti-colonial swadeshi
nationalism. The partition plan was first opposed by moderates but as the
movement progressed, different techniques were improvised for the
Swadeshi campaign. Swadeshi constructive programme included boycott of
foreign goods and government-administered educational institutions. The
Swadeshi movement (1905–1911) is the most important phase of the Indian
National Movement in the pre-Gandhian era, as, during the course of the
The mass base of the movement was expanded by exposing the problems of
various social groups under the British governance and the underlying
commonality in their lives - that is colonial exploitation. For the first time, in
the history of Indian national movement, women, workers, peasants, and
marginalised groups were exposed to modern nationalist ideas and politics.
It was a period when the elite made a conscious effort to address the
common people, calling upon them to join politics. The other prominent
development during the Swadeshi period was the growth of the vernacular
press (newspapers published in Indian languages) in various parts of India.
The nationalistic tone of the vernacular press became more pronounced
during this time. The role played by Swadesamitran in Tamil Nadu, Kesari
in Maharashtra, Yugantar in Bengal are a few examples.
Partition of Bengal
On January 6, 1899, Lord Curzon was appointed the new Governor General
and Viceroy of India. This was a time when British unpopularity was
increasing due to the impact of recurring famine and the plague. Curzon
did little to change the opinion of the educated Indian class. Instead of
engaging with the nationalist intelligentsia, he implemented a series of
repressive measures. For instance, he reduced the number of elected Indian
representatives in the Calcutta Corporation (1899). The University Act of
1904 brought the Calcutta University under the direct control of the
government. The Official Secrets Act (1904) was amended to curb the
nationalist tone of Indian newspapers. Finally, he ordered partition of
2 | P a g e APPOLO STUDY CENTRE PH: 044-24339436, 42867555, 9840226187
Bengal in 1905. The partition led to widespread protest all across India,
starting a new phase of the Indian national movement.
From December 1903 and 1905 this initial idea of transferring or reshuffling
some areas from Bengal was changed to a full-fledged plan of partition. The
Bengal was to be divided into two provinces. The new Eastern Bengal and
Assam were to include the divisions of Chittagong, Dhaka, parts of Rajshahi
hills of Tippera, Assam province and Malda.
The intention of Curzon was to suppress the political activities against the
British rule in Bengal and to create a Hindu–Muslim divide. The
government intentionally ignored alternative proposals presented by the
civil servants, particularly the idea of dividing Bengal on linguistic basis.
Curzon rejected this proposal as this would further consolidate the position
of the Bengali politicians. Curzon was adamant as he wanted to create a
clearly segregated Hindu and Muslim population in the divided Bengal.
Curzon, like many before him, knew very well that there was a clear
geographical divide along the river Bhagirathi: eastern Bengal dominated
by the Muslims, and western Bengal dominated by the Hindus and in the
central Bengal and the two communities balancing out each other. There
was a conscious attempt on the part of British administration to woo the
Muslim population in Bengal. In his speech at Dhaka, in Februry 1904,
Curzon assured the Muslims that in the new province of East Bengal,
Muslims would enjoy a unity, which they had never enjoyed since the days
of old Muslim rule.
3 | P a g e APPOLO STUDY CENTRE PH: 044-24339436, 42867555, 9840226187
The partition, instead of dividing the Bengali people along the religious line,
united them. Perhaps the British administration had underestimated the
growing feeling of Bengali identity among the people, which cut across
caste, class, religion and regional barriers.By the end of the nineteenth
century, a strong sense of Bengali unity had developed among large
sections in the society. Bengali language had acquired literary status with
Rabindranath Tagore as the central figure. The growth of regional language
newspapers played a role in building the narrative of solidarity. Similarly,
recurring famines, unemployment, and a slump in the economic growth
generated an anti-colonial feeling.
Anti-Partition Movement
Both the militants and the moderates were critical of the partition of Bengal
ever since it was announced in December 1903. But the anti-partition
response by leaders like Surendranath Banerjee, K.K. Mitra, and
Prithwishchandra Ray remained restricted to prayers and petitions. The
objective was limited to influencing public opinion in England against the
partition. However, despite this widespread resentment, partition of Bengal
was officially declared on 19 July 1905.
With the failure to stop the partition of Bengal and the pressure exerted by
the radical leaders like Bipin Chandra Pal, Aswini Kumar Dutta, and
Aurobindo Ghose, the moderate leaders were forced to rethink their
strategy, and look for new techniques of protest. Boycott of British goods
was one such method, which after much debate was accepted by the
moderate leadership of the Indian National Congress. So, for the first time,
the moderates went beyond their conventional political methods. It was
decided, at a meeting in Calcutta on 17 July 1905, to extend the protest to
the masses. In the same meeting, Surendranath Banerjee gave a call for the
boycott of British goods and intuitions. On 7 August, at another meeting at
the Calcutta Town Hall, a formal proclamation of Swadeshi Movement was
made.However, the agenda of Swadeshi movement was still restricted to
securing an annulment of the partition and the moderates were very much
against utilizing the campaign to start a full-scale passive resistance. The
militant nationalists, on the other hand, were in favour of extending the
movement to other provinces too and to launch a full-fledged mass
struggle.
Such efforts, both organized and spontaneous, laid the foundation for a
sustained campaign against the British. The boycott and swadeshi were
always interlinked to each other and part of a wider plan to make India self-
sufficient. G. Subramaniam, a nationalist leader from Madras, succinctly
explained the aim of the swadeshi movement as ‗a revolt against their state
of dependence…in all branches of their national life‘. In the words of Gopal
Krishna Gokhale, ‗the swadeshi movement is not only for the improvement
of our industry but for an allround enhancement of our national life ....‘ As
the movement progressed, different definitions of Swadeshi appeared.
However, for the larger part, the movement of Swadeshi and Boycott was
practiced as an anti-colonial political agitation and not as a viable method to
achieve dignity and freedom in life, a definition which would be later
infused with the entry of Mahatma Gandhi.
Swadeshi means ‗of one‘s own country‘. The origin of the idea can be traced
to 1872 when Mahadev Govind Ranade, in a series of lectures in Poona,
popularised the idea of Swadeshi. According to Ranade, the goods
In the 1920s Gandhi gave a new meaning to the idea of Swadeshi by linking
it to the fulfilment of a duty that all Indians owed to the land of their birth.
For Gandhi, Swadeshi did not merely mean the use of what is produced in
one‘s own country. Gandhi defined Swadeshi in following words
―Swadeshi is that spirit in us which restricts us to the use and service of our
immediate surroundings to the exclusion of more remote. I should use only
things that are produced by my immediate neighbours and serve those
industries by making them efficient and complete where they may be found
wanting.‖
Rabindranath Tagore was one of the central figures who popularised such
ideas through his writings. He outlined the constructive programme of
atmashakti (self-help). Tagore called for economic self- development and
insisted that education should be provided in swadeshi languages. He also
made the call for utilising melas, or fairs, to spread the message of
atmashakti. This became the creed of the whole of Bengal and swadeshi
shops sprang all over the place selling textiles, handlooms, soaps,
earthenware, matches and leather goods.
But these mass mobilization efforts failed to flourish as they could not
extend their base among the Muslim peasantry and the ―Depressed
Classes‖. Most of the samitis recruited from the educated middle class and
other upper caste Hindus. Besides this, the swadeshi campaigners often
applied coercive methods, both social and physical. For instance, social
boycott of those purchasing foreign goods was common and taken up
through caste associations and other nationalist organisations.
From 1906, when the abrogation of partition was no longer in sight, the
Swadeshi Movement took a different turn. For many leaders, the movement
was to be utilized for propagating the idea of the political independence or
Swaraj across India. The constructive programmes came under heavy
criticism from Aurobindo Ghose, Bipin Chandra Pal, and other militant
leaders. Under their new direction, the swadeshi agenda included boycott
of foreign goods; boycott of government schools and colleges; boycott of
courts; renouncing the titles and relinquishing government services; and
recourse to armed struggle if British repression went beyond the limits of
endurance. The programme of this nature required mass mobilization.
Using religion, combined with the invocation of a glorious past, became the
essential features of their programmes.
Militant Nationalism
Both the groups, moderate and militant, were well aware of the evils or the
wrong doings of the British rule. The moderates, however, worked under
the belief that the British rule in India could be reformed by convincing the
rulers through representation and petitioning. The militant nationalist, on
the other hand, was of the opinion that the colonial rulers would never be
amenable to reason, as they would not like to give up the advantages of an
empire.
Militant nationalism also changed the nature of political pressure from the
earlier force of public opinion of educated Indians to the protesting masses.
Despite these changes, the militant nationalism phase retained a continuity
from the moderate phase. This continuity was evident in the inability to
transcend the peaceful method of struggle and for the most parts militant
nationalism remained tied to the idea of non-violence. However, they
appealed to the patriotic sentiments of the people using the religious
symbols.
One of the common goals of the militant leaders was to achieve Swaraj or
Self Rule. However, the leaders differed on the meaning of Swaraj. For
Tilak, Swaraj was restricted to the Indian control over the administration or
rule by the natives, but not total severance of relation with Britain. In Bipin
Chandra Pal‘s view, Swaraj was the attainment of complete freedom from
any foreign rule.
The other point of departure of the militants from the moderates was over
the rising extremism in Bengal, Punjab, and Maharashtra. Unlike the
moderates, who were critical of the reckless revolutionaries, militant
The patriotism glued with the assertion of Hindu beliefs was not accepable
to the Muslims. Also much like their predecessors the leaders of the
swadeshi movement failed to penetrate the larger section of the society. By
1908 militant nationalism was on the decline. The Surat split of 1907 was
another contributing factor to this decline.
Surat Split
The tension between the militants and the moderates became more
pronounced with the appointment of Lord Minto as the new Secretary of
State to India in 1906. As the tension was rising between the two groups, a
split was avoided, in the 1906 Calcutta session, by accepting demands of
moderate leaders and electing Dadabhai Naoroji as president. Most of the
moderates, led by Pherozeshah Mehta, were defeated in the election. The
militants managed to pass four resolutions on Swadeshi, Boycott, National
Education, and Self-Government.
The Indian National Congress, born in December 1885, was now split into
two groups – militant and moderate. The Congress which emerged after the
Surat split was more loyal to the British than they were before. The new
Congress, minus the militants, came to be known as Mehta Congress and
the 1908 session of the Congress was attended only by the moderates who
reiterated their loyalty to the Raj. The politics of militants, on the other
9 | P a g e APPOLO STUDY CENTRE PH: 044-24339436, 42867555, 9840226187
hand, could not crystallize into a new political organization. The primary
reason was the repressive measures of the government by putting all the
prominent leaders in jail.
Revolutionary Extremism
Around 1908, the decline of the militant nationalists and the rise of
revolutionary activities marked an important shift from non-violent
methods to violent action. It also meant a shift from mass-based action to
elite response to the British rule. In Bengal, revolutionary terrorism had
developed even earlier; around the 1870s, when the akharas or gymnasiums
were setup in various places to develop what Swami Vivekananda had
described as strong muscles and nerves of steel. Bankim Chandra
Chatterjee‘s novel, Anandmath also had a significant impact. Anandmath was
widely read by the revolutionaries in Bengal. The Bande Mataram song,
which is part of the novel, became the anthem of the swadeshi movement.
The failure of the militant nationalists to lead the young people into a long-
term mass movement also contributed to the growth of individual action.
A conspiracy was hatched there to kill Douglas Kingsford, notorious for his
cruel ways of dealing with the swadeshi agitators. Two young
revolutionaries - 18-year-old Khudiram Bose and 19-year-old Prafulla Chaki
– were entrusted with the task of carrying out the killing. On 30 April 1908,
they mistakenly threw a bomb on a carriage, that, instead of killing
Kingsford, killed two English women. Prafulla Chaki committed suicide
and Khudiram Bose was arrested and hanged for the murder.
After his acquittal, Aurobindo Ghose took to a spiritual path and shifted his
base to Pondicherry, where he stayed until his death in 1950. The idea of
bringing an armed revolution, envisaged by Aurobindo Ghose, never
materialized. The reason for the gradual decline in the revolutionary
activities in Bengal was a combination of government repression and
The Newspapers (Incitement to Offence) Act, 1908. This act empowered the
magistrate to confiscate press property which published objectionable
material making it difficult to publish anything critical of British rule.
Indian Press Act 1910 made it mandatory for publishers and the printers to
deposit a security that could be seized in case they printed ‗obnoxious
material‘.
The Indian Criminal Law Amendment Act allowed summary trails and also
imposed the prohibition of ‗association dangerous to the public peace‘.
Swadeshi meetings at the Marina beach in Madras were a regular sight. The
Moore Market complex in Madras was another venue utilised for such
gatherings. During the period (1905- 1907) there are police reports calling
students dangerous and their activities as seditious. Europeans in public
places were greeted by the students with shouts of Vande Mataram. In 1907,
Bipin Chandra Pal came to Madras and his speeches on the Madras Beach
electrified the audience and won new converts to the nationalist cause. The
visit had a profound impact all over Tamil Nadu. The public speeches in the
Tamil language created an audience which was absent during the formative
years of the political activities in Tamil Nadu.
In 1906, V.O.C. registered a joint stock company called The Swadeshi Steam
Navigation Company (SSNC) with a capital of Rs 10 Lakh, divided into
40,000 shares of Rs. 25 each. Shares were open only to Indians, Ceylonese
and other Asian nationals. V.O.C. purchased two steamships, S.S. Gallia
and S.S. Lawoe. When in the other parts of India, the response to Swadeshi
was limited to symbolic gestures of making candles and bangles, the idea of
forging a Swadeshi Steam Navigation Company was really spectacular.
V.O.C invoked the rich history of the region and the maritime glory of
India‘s past and used it as a reference point to galvanize the public opinion
in favour of a Swadeshi venture in the sea.
The initiative of V.O.C. was lauded by the national leaders. Lokmanya Tilak
wrote about the success of the Swadeshi Navigation Company in his papers
After attending the session of the Indian National Congress at Surat, V.O.C.
on his return decided to work on building a political organisation. While
looking for an able orator, he came across Subramania Siva, a swadeshi
preacher. From February to March 1907, both the leaders addressed
meetings almost on a daily basis at the beach in Tuticorin, educating the
people about swadeshi and the boycott campaign. The meetings were
attended by thousands of people. These public gatherings were closely
monitored by the administration.
In 1908, the abject working and living conditions of the Coral Mill workers
attracted the attention of V.O.C and Siva. In the next few days, both the
leaders addressed the mill workers. In March 1908, the workers of the Coral
Cotton Mills, inspired by the address went on strike. It was one of the
earliest organised labour agitations in India.
The strike of the mill workers was fully backed by the nationalist
newspapers. The mill owners, however, did not budge and was supported
by the government which had decided to suppress the strike. To further
increase the pressure on the workers, the leaders were prohibited from
holding any meetings in Tuticorin. Finally, the mill owners decided to
negotiate with the workers and concede their demands
.
This victory of the workers generated excitement among the militants in
Bengal and it was hailed by the newspapers in Bengal. For instance,
Aurobindo Ghosh‘s Bande Matram hailed the strike as ―forging a bond
between educated class and the masses, which is the first great step towards
swaraj…. Every victory of Indian labour is a victory for the nation….‖
The growth of newspapers, both in English and Tamil language, aided the
swadeshi movement in Tamil Nadu. G. Subramaniam was one of the first
among the leaders to use newspapers to spread the nationalist message
across a larger audience. Subramaniam, along with five others, founded The
Hindu (in English) and Swadesamitran (which was the first ever Tamil
daily). In 1906 a book was published by Subramaniam to condemn the
British actions during the Congress Conference in Barsal. Swadesamitran
extensively reported nationalist activities, particularly the news regarding
V.O.C. and his speeches in Tuticorin.
On March 9, 1907, Bipin Chandra Pal was released from prison after serving
a six-month jail sentence. The swadeshi leaders in Tamil Nadu planned to
celebrate the day of his release as ‗Swarajya Day‘ in Tirunelveli. The local
administration refused permission. V.O.C., Subramania Siva and
The local public, angered over the arrest of the prominent swadeshi leaders,
reacted violently. Shops were closed in a general show of defiance. The
municipality building and the police station in Tirunelveli were set on fire.
More importantly, the mill workers came out in large numbers to protest
the arrest of swadeshi leaders. After a few incidents of confrontation with
the protesting crowd, the police open fired, and four people were killed.
On 7 July 1908, V.O.C. and Subramania Siva were found guilty and
imprisoned on charges of sedition. Siva was awarded a sentence of 10 years
of transportation for his seditious speech whereas V.O.C. got a life term (20
years) for abetting him. V.O.C. was given another life sentence for his own
seditious speech. This draconian sentence reveals how seriously the
Tirunelveli agitation was viewed by the government.
Excerpts from the Judgment in the case of King Emperor versus V.O.C. and
Subramania Siva (4 November 1908).―It seems to me that sedition at any time
is a most serious offense. It is true that the case is the first of its kind in the
Presidency, but the present condition of other Presidencies where the crime
seems to have secured a foothold would seem to indicate that light sentences
of imprisonment of a few months or maybe a year or two are instances of
misplaced leniency. ...The first object of a sentence is that it shall be deterrent
not to the criminal alone but to others who feel any inclination to follow his
example. Here we have to deal with a campaign of sedition which nearly
ended in revolt. The accused are morally responsible for all the lives lost in
quelling the riots that ensured on their arrest‖.
In June 1911, the collector of Tirunelveli, Robert Ashe, was shot dead at
Maniyachi Railway station by Vanchinathan. Born in the Travancore state in
1880, he was employed as a forest guard at Punalur in the then Travancore
state. He was one of the members of a radical group called Bharata Mata
Association. The aim of the association was to kill the European officers and
inspire Indians to revolt, which they believed would eventually lead to
Swaraj. Vanchinathan was trained in the use of a revolver, as part of the
mission, by V.V. Subramanianar in Pondicherry.
During the course of the trial, the British government was able to establish
that V.V.S and other political exiles in Pondicherry were in close and active
association with the accused in the Ashe murder conspiracy. The colonial
administration grew more suspicious with the Pondicherry groups and
their activities. Such an atmosphere further scuttled the possibility of
nationalistic propaganda and their activities in Tamil Nadu. As a fall-out of
the repressive measure taken by the colonial government, the nationalist
movement in Tamil Nadu entered a period of lull and some sort of revival
happened only with the Home Rule Movement in 1916.
Even though there were many radical groups functioning in India earlier the
presence of a Communist state in the form of USSR greatly alarmed the
British in India. The first batch of radicals reached Peshawar on 3 June 1921.
They were arrested immediately under the charges of being Bolshevik
(Russian communist agents) comeing to India to create troubles. A series of
five conspiracy cases were instituted against them between the years 1922
and 1927. The first of these was the Peshawar Conspiracy case. This was
followed by the Kanpur (Bolshevik) Conspiracy case in (1924) and the most
famous, the Meerut Conspiracy case (1929). Meanwhile, the CPI was
formally founded on Indian soil in 1925 in Bombay.
The colonial administrators did not take the spread of communist ideas
lightly. Radicalism spread across the British Provinces – Bombay, Calcutta
and Madras - and industrial centres like Kanpur in United Province (UP)
and cities like Lahore where factories had come up quite early. As a result,
trade unions emerged in the jute and cotton textile industries, the railway
companies across the country and among workers in the various municipal
bodies. In order to curb the radicalisation of politics, especially to check what
was then called Bolshevism, repressive measures were adopted by the
British administration. The Kanpur Conspiracy case of 1924 was one such
move. Those charged with the conspiracy were communists and trade
unionists.
The accused were arrested spread over a period of six months. Eight of them
were charged under Section 121-A of the Indian Penal Code – ‗to deprive the
King Emperor of his sovereignty of British India, by complete separation of
India from imperialistic Britain by a violent revolution‘, and sent to various
jails. The case came before Sessions Judge H.E. Holmes who had earned
notoriety while serving as Sessions Judge of Gorakhpur for awarding death
sentence to 172 peasants for their involvement in the Chauri Chaura case. In
the Kanpur Conspiracy case, Muzaffar Ahmed, Shaukat Usmani, Nalini
Gupta and S. A. Dange were sent to jail, for four years of rigorous
imprisonmentl. The trial and the imprisonment, meanwhile, led to some
awareness about the communist activities in India. A Communist Defence
Committee was formed in British India to raise funds and engage lawyers
for the defence of the accused. Apart from these, the native press in India
reported the court proceedings extensively.
The trial in the conspiracy case and the imprisonment of some of the leaders
rather than kill the spirit of the radicals gave a fillip to communist activities.
In December 1925, a Communist Conference of different communist groups,
from all over India, was held.SingaraveluChettiar from Tamil Nadu took
part in this conference. It was from there that the Communist Party of India
was established, formally, with Bombay as its Headquarters.
The Meerut Conspiracy Case of 1929, was, perhaps, the most famous of all
the communist conspiracy cases instituted by the British Government. The
late 1920s witnessed a number of labour upsurges and this period of unrest
extended into the decade of the Great Depression (1929–1939). Trade
unionism spread over to many urban centres and organised labour strikes.
The communists played a prominent role in organising the working class
throughout this period. The Kharagpur Railway workshop strikes in
February and September 1927, the Liluah Rail workshop strike between
January and July 1928, the Calcutta scavengers‘ strike in 1928, the several
strikes in the jute mills in Bengal during July-August 1929, the strike at the
Golden Rock workshop of the South Indian Railway, Tiruchirappalli, in July
1928, the textile workers‘ strike in Bombay in April 1928 are some of the
strikes that deserve mention.
Alarmed by this wave of strikes and the spread of communist activities, the
British Government brought two draconian Acts - the Trade Disputes Act,
1928 and the Public Safety Bill, 1928. These Acts armed the government with
powers to curtail civil liberties in general and suppress the trade union
activities in particular. The government was worried about the strong
communist influence among the workers and peasants.
The British government conceived of conducting the trial in Meerut (and not,
for instance in Bombay from where a large chunk of the accused hailed) so that
they could get away with the obligations of a jury trial. They feared a jury trial
could create sympathy for the accused.
Under the national and international pressure, on appeal, the sentences were
considerably reduced in July 1933.
Bhagat Singh was born to Kishan Singh (father) and Vidyavati Kaur
(mother) on 28 September 1907 in Jaranwala, Lyallpur district, Punjab, now a
part of Pakistan. His father was a liberal and his family was a family of
freedom fighters. The Jallianwala Bagh massacre happened when Bhagat
Singh was 14 years. Early in his youth, he was associated with the Naujawan
Bharat Sabha and the Hindustan Republican Association. The latter
organisation was founded by Sachin Sanyal and Jogesh Chatterji. It was
reorganised subsequently in September 1928 as the Hindustan Socialist
Republican Association (H.S.R.A) by Bhagat Singh and his comrades.
Socialist ideals and the October Revolution in Russia of 1917 were large
influences on these revolutionaries. Bhagat Singh was one of the leaders of
the H.S.R.A along with Chandrashekhar Azad, Shivaram Rajguru and
Sukhdev Thapar.
The image that comes to our mind at the very mention of Bhagat Singh‘s
name is that of the bomb he threw in the Central Legislative Assembly on
April 8, 1929. The bombs did not kill anybody. It was intended as a
demonstrative action, an act of protest against the draconian laws of the
British. They chose the day on which the Trade Disputes Bill, an anti-labour
legislation was introduced in the assembly.
Bhagat Singh along with Rajguru, Sukhdev, Jatindra Nath Das and 21 others
were arrested and tried for the murder of Saunders (the case was known as
the Second Lahore Conspiracy Case). Jatindra Nath Das died in the jail after
64 days of hunger strike against the discriminatory practices and poor
conditions in jail. The verdict in the bomb throwing case had been
suspended until the trial of Lahore Conspiracy trials was over. It was in this
case that Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Sukhdev were sentenced to death on 7
October 1930.
A letter from them to the Governor of Punjab shows their courage and their
optimism over the future of India even while facing death for the cause of
freedom of their country. It says, ‗the days of capitalism and imperialism are
numbered. The war neither began with us nor is going to end with our
lives… According to the verdict of your court we had waged a war and we
are therefore war prisoners. And we claim to be treated as such i.e., we claim
to be shot dead instead of being hanged.‖
Some narratives describe Bhagat Singh and his fellow patriots as terrorists.
This is a misconception. The legendary Bhagat Singh clarified how his group
is different from the terrorists. He said, during his trial, that revolution is not
23 | P a g e APPOLO STUDY CENTRE PH: 044-24339436, 42867555, 9840226187
just the cult of bomb and pistol…Revolution is the inalienable right of
mankind. Freedom is the imperishable birth-right of all. The labourer is the
real sustainer of society.. To the altar of this revolution we have brought our
youth as incense, for no sacrifice is too great for so magnificent a cause.‘
Symbolically, they also shouted Inquilab Zindabad after this defence
statement of his in the court.
Bhagat Singh, Rajguru and Sukhdev were hanged early in the morning of
March 23, 1931 in the Lahore Jail. They faced the gallows with courage,
shouting Inquilab Zindabad and Down with British Imperialism until their
last breath. The history of freedom struggle is incomplete without the
revolutionary strand of nationalism and the ultimate sacrifice of these
revolutionaries. One more name in the list of such fighters is Kalpana Dutt.
In the late 1920s a young woman, Kalpana Dutt (known as Kalpana Joshi
after her marriage to the communist leader P.C. Joshi), fired the patriotic
imagination of young people by her daring raid of the Chittagong armoury.
Surya Sen‘s revolutionary group, the Indian Republican Army, was named
after the Irish Republican Army. They planned a rebellion to occupy
Chittagong in a guerrilla-style operation. The Chittagong armouries were
raided on the night of 18 April 1930. Simultaneous attacks were launched on
telegraph offices, the armoury and the police barracks to cut off all
communication networks including the railways to isolate the region. It was
aimed at challenging the colonial administration directly.
While Bhagat Singh represented young men who dedicated their lives to the
freedom of the country, Kalpana Dutt represented the young women who
defied the existing patriarchal set up and took to arms for the liberation of
their motherland. Not only did they act as messengers (as elsewhere) but
they also participated in direct actions, fought along with men, carrying
guns.
Even a cursory look at the fundamental rights resolution will tell you that all
the basic rights that the British denied to the Indians found a prominent
place in the Resolution. The colonial government curtailed civil liberties and
freedom by passing draconian acts and ordinances. Gandhian ideals and
Nehru‘s socialist vision also found a place in the list of rights that the Indian
National Congress promised to ensure in free India.
The existing social relations, especially the caste system and the practice
untouchability, were also challenged with a promise to ensure equal access
to public places and institutions.
The Fundamental Rights, in fact, found a place in the Part III of the
Constitution of India– Fundamental Rights - and some of them went into
Part IV, the Directive Principles of the State policy. You will study more on
these in unit 13 of the second volume in the discussion on the Constitution of
India.
The Great Depression was a severe and prolonged economic crisis which
lasted for about a decade from 1929. The slowdown of the economic
activities, especially industrial production, led to crises like lockouts, wage
cut, unemployment and starvation. It began in North America and affected
Europe and all the industrial centres in the world. As the world was
integrated by the colonial order in its economic sphere, developments in one
part of the world affected other parts as well.
The crash in the Wall Street (where the American Stock Exchange was
located) triggered an economic depression of great magnitude. The
Depression hit India too. British colonialism aggravated the situation in
India. Depression affected both industrial and agrarian sectors. Labour
27 | P a g e APPOLO STUDY CENTRE PH: 044-24339436, 42867555, 9840226187
unrest broke out in industrial centres such as Bombay, Calcutta, Kanpur,
United Province and Madras against wage cuts, lay-offs and for the
betterment of living conditions. In the agriculture sector, prices of the
agricultural products, which depended on export markets like jute and raw
cotton fell steeply. The depression brought down the value of Indian exports
from Rs. 311 crores in 1929–1930 to Rs 132 crores in 1932–33. Therefore, the
1930s witnessed the emergence of the Kisan Sabhas which fought for rent
reduction, relief from debt traps and even for the abolition of Zamindari.
The only positive impact was on the Indian industrial sector that could use
the availability of land at reduced prices and labour at cheap wage rates. The
weakening ties with Britain and other capitalist countries created a condition
where growth was recorded in some of the Indian industries. Yet only the
industries which fed the local consumption thrived.
The British trade policy took a heavy toll on the indigenous industry.
Industrialization of India was not part of British policy. Like other colonies,
India was treated as a raw material procurement area and a market for their
finished goods.
The first Indian to start a cotton mill was Cowasjee Nanabhoy Davar (1815–
73), a Parsi, in Bombay in 1854. This was known as the Bombay Spinning
and Weaving Company. The city‘s leading traders, mostly Parsis,
contributed to this endeavour. The American Civil War (1861–65) was a
boon to the cotton farmers. But after the Civil War when Britain continued to
import cotton from America, Indian cotton cultivators came to grief. But
Europeans started textile mills in India, taking advantage of the cheapness of
cotton available. Ahmedabad textiles mills were established by Indian
entrepreneurs and both Ahmedabad and Bombay became prominent centres
of cotton mills. By 1914, there were 129 spinning, weaving and other cotton
mills within Bombay presidency. Between 1875–76 and 1913-14, the number
of cotton textile mills in India increased from 47 to 271.
Jute was yet another industry that picked up in India in the late nineteenth
and early twentieth century. The first jute mill in Calcutta was founded in
1855. The growth of jute industry was so rapid and by 1914, there were 64
mills in Calcutta Presidency. However, unlike the Bombay textile industry,
these mills were owned by Europeans. Though the industrial development
in the nineteenth century was mainly confined to very limited sectors like
cotton, jute, etc., efforts were made to diversify the sectors. For example, the
Bengal Coal Company was set up in 1843 in Raiganj by Dwarakanath Tagore
(1794–1847), grandfather of Rabindranath Tagore. The coal industry picked
up after 1892 and its growth peaked during First World War years.
The First World War gave a landmark break to the industrialisation of the
country. For the first time, Britain‘s strategic position in the East was
challenged by Japan. The traditional trade routes were vulnerable to attack.
To meet the requirements, development of industries in India became
necessary. Hence, Britain loosened its grip and granted some concessions to
the Indian capitalists. Comparative relaxation of control by the British
government and the expansion of domestic market due to the War,
facilitated the process of industrialisation. For the first time, an industrial
commission was appointed in 1916. During the war-period, the cotton and
jute industries showed much growth. Steel industry was yet another sector
marked by substantial growth.
In 1929–30, 44 per cent of the total amount of cotton piece goods consumed
in India came from outside, but by 1933–34, after the Great Depression, the
proportion had fallen to 20.5 percent. Other two industries which registered
impressive growth were sugar and cement. The Interwar years saw a growth
in the shipping industry too. The Scindia Steam Navigation Company
Limited (1919) was the pioneer. In 1939, they even took over the Bombay
Steam Navigation Company Ltd., a British concern. Eight Indian concerns
were operational in this sector. A new phase of production began with the
Second World War, which led to the extension of manufacturing industries
to machineries, aircrafts, locomotives, and so on