General Principles of Investigation
General Principles of Investigation
General Principles of Investigation
In the performance of his duties, the investigator must seek to establish the six
(6) cardinal points of investigation, namely: what specific offense has been committed;
how the offense was committed; who committed it; where the offense was committed;
when it was committed; and why it was committed.
In improving the guild of the accused in court, the fact of the existence of
the crime must be established; the defendant must be identified and associated
with the crime scene; competent and credible witnesses must be available; and
the physical evidence must be appropriately identified. The proof of guild will
depend on the establishment of the essential elements of the crime. The
investigator must know by heart the elements of specific crime.
3. Investigator’s Notebook.
Purpose: Considering the mass of details and the number of cases which in some
instances an investigator is handling, it is very possible that he might forget some details.
Many of the details associated with the investigation, while not essential to the report,
might become points of interest to the court when the case is brought to trial.
Experienced investigators employ a handbook to record the relevant details of the case.
During trial, the court allows investigators to consult their notes to refresh their
memory.
1. Recording Note: The data of the investigation should be recorded in a complete,
accurate and legible fashion so that in the event another investigator isrequired to
assume the responsibility for the investigation, he can make intelligent use of the
notebook.
1. ARREST
1. Arrest Defined – Arrest is the taking of a person into custody
so he can answer for the commission of an offense.
2. Methods of Arrest:
1. With warrant of arrest – the officer shall inform the person to be
arrested of the cause of the arrest and of the fact that a warrant
hasbeen issued for his arrest, except when he flees or forcibly
resist before the officer has opportunity so to inform him or
when the giving of such information will imperil the arrest.
The officer neednot have the warrant in his possession at the
time of the arrest but after the arrest, if the person arrested
so requires, the warrantsshall be shown to him as soon as
practicable.
3. Investigator’s/operative’s conduct.
1. Be natural and pleasant but forceful and aggressive.
2. Dominate the situation.
3. Voice must command authority
4. Demand prompt and absolute obedience.
5. Nervousness should be controlled.
6. Avoid acting “tough” as the subject will be the first to detect it.
7. Avoid profanity (this reflects personality weakness).
8. Avoid being reticent or apologetic.
9. Avoid unnecessary conversation.
10. Investigator in charge does the talking and gives the
commands.
16. Right of Person Arrested. Republic Act No. 7438 states the
right of a person arrested, detained or under custodial investigation.
(Appendix A)
23. How to Serve a Search Warrant. A search warrant must be served within
ten
1. days from its date (thereafter, it shall be void) Sec 9, Rule 126) in the following
manner:
1. The police officer concerned must go to the place indicated in the search
warrant and take the things described therein, in the presence of atleast one
competent witness who is a resident of the neighborhood. If heis refused
admittance to the place of search after giving notice of his purpose and
authority, he may force himself in to execute the warrant; and if he is detained
therein, he may force himself out to liberate himself. (Sec 6, ibid)
2. The search must be made at daytime, unless otherwise stated (Sec. 8, ibid)
3. The officer seizing the property must issue a detailed receipt of the things
seized to the person in whose possession it was found, or in the absence of
such person, he must, in the present of at least one witness, leave such
receipt in the place where such things was seized. (Sec .10, ibid)
1. In compliance with this procedure, it has been standard practiceto
issue a RECIEPT FOR PROPERTY SEIZED (See Apendix “A”) after
a seizure. The receipt is signed by the seizing officer only and two
witnesses. Recent Supreme Court decision, however, declare that
such receipt when signed by the accused, is in effect anextrajudicial
confession of the commission of the offense charge. (People v de las
Marinas, G.R. No. 87215, 30 Apr 91; and People v Mauyao, G.R. No.
84525, 6 Apr 92). Consequently, if the accused does not sign such
receipt, it may still be used in evidence. Moreover, if the accused DID
in fact sign the receipt, but he signed it with the assistance of a lawyer
of his choice, that act would constitute a valid waiver of his right
against self-incrimination.
2. It must be noted that in the cases cited above, the crime chargedis
possession of prohibited drugs. Thus, the signature of an accused
on the receipt is a declaration against interest and a tacit
admission of the crime charged, as mere unexplained possession
of prohibited drugs is punishable. The doctrine is therefore not a hard
and fast rule as far as the “Receipt for Property Seize” is concerned.
If the crime charged is possession of unlicensed firearms, for
example, the doctrine would apply. In other cases, it will not apply.
3. Another document which is madder after a search is a
CERTIFICATION OF PROPERTY SEIZED (See Appendix “B”).This
is signed by the owner of the seized property, and would seemto fall
more under the court pronouncement above than the “Receipt for
Property Seized” does.
4. As much as possible, during the opening of safes, drawers, cabinets, tables,
etc., the lifting of the articles should be done by the owner of the house or
his authorized representative, or by immediate members of his family, to
preclude any suspicion of theft of planting of evidence.
5. Thereafter, the officer must immediately deliver the things or property seized
to the judge who issued the warrant, together with an inventory duly verified
under oath. (Sec 11, ibid.)
2. Types of Searches:
1. Wall Search. The purpose is to place the subject in an “off-balance”
position requiring the use of both arms and legs to keep him from falling to the
ground. This is the safest type of search. It does not necessarily require a wall;
any object that can support the weight of the subject (such as a car) can be used.
The procedures are:
1. Require subject to place both hands on the wall slightly higher than his waist. Spread
hands as far apart as possible. Palms should be place against the wall, fingers
extended.
2. The subject’s feet must be extended back away from the wall as far as possible.
Spread them far apart as possible, toes pointed out. Buttocks should not be on an
arched position.
3. The subject’s head should be down or bowed at all times.
4. Mechanics in executing the “Wall Search”:
1. If there is only one subject, the leader of the search should
place himself atone side, while his subordinate is on the other side;
2. To search the other side, the subordinate should move to the opposite side;
3. If there are two or three subjects, move one subject to be
searched on thewall, but out of reach of the others;
4. Search both sides of subject, the leader conducting the
searches and thesubordinate guarding the other subjects;
5. Move one subject at a time;
6. Subject’s head should be down at all times;
7. the subordinate should concentrate on the actions of the
subject and not theaction of the leader;
8. When there are more than three subjects, additional
personnel should besummoned;
9. In serious apprehensions, the searcher should hold his
weapon in readyposition throughout the search;
10. The body must be searched systematically with the foot of
the searcher placetightly against subject’s foot, right with right, left with left,
anklebone against anklebone;
11. Remove any object found, then examine the palm of the
palm of the hand,including between the fingers.
2. Standing Search.
1. Raise subjects’ hand over his head and spread his feet far
apartas possible.
This is not recommended because the subject is in the “on
balance”position.
3. Kneeling Search.
1. Subject kneels on the ground with hands raised over his head.
This is also discouraged for the same reason as the
“standingsearch.”
4. Prone Search.
1. Subject lies on his stomach with arms and legs outstretched.
2. Subject has both arms and legs free and is at all times in an “on
balance”
position.
3. Front part of clothing cannot be searched.
4. This can extremely dangerous if the subject has knowledge of
judo.
2. When applying handcuffs, give the following orders to the subject and follow
this procedure:
1. First Order: “Take your right hand off the wall and place it on your
back.” Fasten the handcuff to this hand and firmly hold the other
handcuff.
2. Second Order. “Move up and put your hand against the wall.” Allow
the subject to move closer to the wall, making certain his feet remain
back far enough to keep him “off-balance.”
3. Third Order: “Take your other hand off the wall and place it on the
small of your back.” Fasten the other handcuff and double-lock both
handcuffs
4. Final Order: “Stand up and face the wall.” Help the subject in
doing this.
2. Transporting a Prisoner.
1. If transported by jeep, the subject is seated on the right rear seat and police
seats at the rear on the left side facing the subject. Secure the hands of the
subject under his knees.
2. If transported by card, the subject is seated on the left rear seat and the
investigator sits on the right rear seat. Hands of the subject should be
secured under his knees.
2. RAIDS AND SEIZURES
1. Introduction.
1. Every member of a law enforcement organization
must know the technique ofconducting a raid.
2. Raids are usually made after careful investigation and
when other methods ofaccomplishing the mission are not suitable.
3. Whenever available, men experienced in conducting
police raids should bechosen as raid commanders.
9. Planning the Raid. The success of a raid depends upon intelligent planning
and competent implementation. To achieve the necessary element of
surprise, the operation must be performed surreptitiously and with speed.
1. The terrain and buildings should be subjected to close study.
2. In order to obtain the necessary data for planning, a reconnaissance/surveillance
of the place should be conducted.
3. The participants should be informed of the nature of the mission.
4. The specific assignment and position of each member of the raiding party, the
tactics to be employed, the equipment and transportation to be used, the
evaluation of possible danger points, and the optimum time to be selected should
be stressed.
5. Things to consider when planning a raid:
1. Need for surveillance.
2. Number of individuals to be apprehended. Are they armed? With what?If
uncertain, assume they are armed.
3. Are photographs and descriptions of subjects available for use in the
briefing?
4. Determine the physical structure of the place where the criminals are
located.
5. Determine all possible escape routes.
6. Need to discreetly photograph the place and immediate area
7. Type of neighborhood where the hideout is located.
8. Volume and kind of activities in the neighborhood at various times (to
determine the most desirable time to conduct the raid).
9. Street plans of neighborhood for possible road blocks.
10. Do the men have confidence in the ability of the raid leader?
11. Consider:
. Speed – in moving into position and the execution of the plan.
. Surprise – catch subjects off-guard.
. Simplicity – plan that is easy to remember and understand; this avoids
confusion.
12. Consider the dividing the raiding party into:
. Cover group: moves into position on first, covers advance of raiding
group and avenues of escape.
. Raid group: disarms and restrains subjects, searches premises secures
evidences, etc.
13. Does every member of the raiding groups know the raid plan completely?
The identities and duties of all?
14. What is your move-out plan?
15. What are the instructions concerning the use of firearms?
16. What are the instructions concerning the possible handling of traffic?
17. What are the instructions concerning communications, signals, etc.?
18. Make sure your plan avoid crossfire.
19. Do you have all equipment you might need, such as flashlights,searchlights,
vehicles, transceivers, loudspeaker, (public address system), firearms,
teargas, etc.?
20. Ask each participant to repeat his duties to the raid leader.
14. Mug shots and Fingerprints. Arresting units shall at all times
take the mug shots and fingerprints of all arrested persons. Copies thereof
shall be submitted to the PNP Crime Laboratory Service to serve as master
file.
3. INQUEST
SECTION 1. Concept. – Inquest is an informal and summary investigation
conducted by a public prosecutor in criminal cases involving persons arrested and
detained without the benefit of a warrant of arrest issued by the court for the purpose of
determining whether or not said persons should remain under custody and
correspondingly be charged in court.
SECTION 2. Designation of Inquest Officer – The City or Provincial Prosecutor
shall designate the Prosecutors assigned to inquest duties and shall furnish the Philippine
National Police (PNP) a list of their names and their schedule of assignments. However,
there is only one Prosecutor in the area, all inquest cases shall be referred to him for
appropriate action.
The inquest proceedings must be terminated within the period prescribed under
the provisions of Article 125 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended. Inquest Procedure
Violation of the Forestry Law (PD No. 705) scale sheets containing the volume and
species of the forest products confiscated, number of pieces and other important details
such as estimated value of the products confiscated; certification of Department of
Environment and Natural Resources/ Bureau of Forest Management; and seizure receipt.
The submission of the foregoing documents shall not be absolutely required if there are
other forms of evidence submitted which will sufficiently establish the facts sought to be
proved by the foregoing documents.
SECTION 5. Incomplete documents. – When the documents presented are not
complete to establish probable cause, the Inquest Officer shall direct the law enforcement
agency to submit the required evidence within the prescribed period under the provision
of Article 125 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended. Otherwise, the Inquest Officer
shall order the release of the detained person and, where the inquest is conducted outside
of office hours, direct the law enforcement agency concerned to file the case with the City
or Provincial Prosecutor for appropriate action.
SECTION 8. Duty of Inquest Officer – The Inquest Officer shall first determine if
the arrest of the detained person was made in accordance with paragraphs (a) and (b) of
Section 5, Rule 13 of the 1985 Rules on Criminal Procedure, as amended, which provide
that arrest without a warrant may be affected:
23. when, in the presence of the arresting officer, the person to be arrested has
committed, is actually committing, or is attempting to commit anoffense; or
24. when an offense has in fact just been committed and the arresting officers has
personal knowledge of facts indicating that the person to be arrested has committed
it.
For the purpose, the Inquest Officer may summarily examine the arresting
officers on the circumstances surrounding the arrest of apprehension of
the detained person.
The MTC and MCTC judge can conduct preliminary investigation. And after
examining the affidavit of complainant/s together with the witness/es in a searching
question and answer the probable cause exist and there is necessity of placing the
respondent under immediate custody, he shall issue a warrant of arrest. Within ten (10)
days after conclusion of preliminary investigation, he shall transmit to the provincial or city
prosecutor for appropriate action.
SECTION 9. Where arrest not properly effected. – Should the Inquest Officer find
that the arrest was not made in accordance with the Rules, he shall:
25. recommend the release of the person arrested or detained;
26. note down the disposition on the referral document;
27. prepare a brief memorandum indicating the reasons for the actiontaken;
and
28. forward the same, together with the record of the case, to the City or
Provincial Prosecutor for appropriate action. Where the recommendation
for the release of the detained person is approved by the City or Provincial
Prosecutor but the evidence on hand warrants the conduct of a regular preliminary
investigation, the order of release shall be served on theofficer having custody of
said detainee and shall direct the said officer to serve upon the detainee the
subpoena or notice of preliminary investigation, together with the copies of the
charge sheet or complaint, affidavits or sworn statements of the complainant and
his witnesses and other supporting evidence.
SECTION 10. Where arrest properly effected. – Should the Inquest Officer find
that the arrest was properly effected, the detained person shall be asked if he desires to
avail himself of a preliminary investigation and, if he does, he shall be made to execute
a waiver of the provisions of Article 125 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended, with
the assistance of a lawyer and, in case of non-availability of a lawyer, a responsible
person of his choice. The preliminary investigation may be conducted by the Inquest
Officer himself or by any other Assistant Prosecutor to whom the case may be assigned
by the City or Provincial Prosecutor, which investigation shall be terminated withinfifteen
(15) days from inception.
SECTION 11. Inquest proper. – Where the detained person does not opt for a
preliminary investigation or otherwise refuses to execute the required waiver, the Inquest
Officer shall proceed with the inquest by examining the sworn statements/affidavits of the
complainant and the witnesses and other supporting evidence submitted to him.
If necessary, the Inquest Officer shall require the presence of the complaining witnesses
and subject them to an informal and summary investigation or examination for purposes
of determining the existence of probable cause.
SECTION 12. Meaning of probable cause. -Probable cause exists when the
evidence submitted to the Inquest Officer engenders a well-founded belief that a crime
has been committed and that the arrested or detained person is probable guilty thereof.
SECTION 13. Presence of Probable cause. – If the Inquest Officer finds that
probable cause exists, he shall forthwith prepare the corresponding complaint/
information with the recommendation that the same be filed in court. The
complaint/information shall indicate the offense committed and the amount of bail
recommended, if available.
Thereafter, the record of the case, together with the prepared complaint/information, shall
be forwarded to the City of Provincial Prosecutor for appropriate action.
The complain/information may be filed by the Inquest Officer himself or by any other
Assistant Prosecutor to whom the case may be assigned by the City or Provincial
Prosecutor.
SECTION 16, Presence at crime scene. – Whenever a dead body is found and
there is reason to believe that the death resulted from foul play, or from the unlawful acts
or omissions of other persons and such fact has been brought to his attention, the Inquest
Officer shall:
41. forthwith proceed to the crime scene or place of discovery of the dead person; and
42. cause an immediate autopsy to be conducted by the appropriate medico-legal
officer in the locality or the PNP medico-legal division or he NBI medico-legal office,
as the case may be;
43. direct the police investigator to cause the taking of photographs of the crime scene
or place of discovery of the dead body;
44. supervise the investigation to be conducted by the police authorities as well as the
recovery of all articles and piece of evidence found thereat and see to it that the
same are safeguarded and the chain of the custody thereof properly recorded; and
45. submit a written report of his finding to the City or Provincial Prosecutor for
appropriate action.
SECTION 18. Recovered articles. – The Inquest Officer shall see to it that all
articles recovered by the police at the time of the arrest or apprehension of the detained
person are physically inventoried, checked and accounted for with the issuance of
corresponding receipts by the police officer/investigator concerned.
The said articles must be properly deposited with the police evidence custodian
and not with the police investigator.
Inquest Officer shall ensure that the items recovered are duly safe guarded and
the chain of custody is properly recorded.
SECTION 19. Release of recovered articles. – The Inquest Officer shall, with the
prior approval of the City or Provincial Prosecutor or his duly authorized representative,
order the release of recovered articles to their lawful owner or possessor, subject to the
conditions that:
46. there is a written request for their release;
47. the person requesting the release of said articles is shown to be the lawful
owner or possessor thereof;
48. the requesting party undertakes under oath to produce said articles before
the court when so required;
49. the requesting party, if he is material witness to the case, affirms or reaffirms
his statement concerning the case and undertakes under oath to appear and
testify before the court when so required;
50. the said articles are not the instruments, or tools in the commission of the
offense charged nor the proceeds thereof; and
51. photographs of said articles are first taken and duly certified to by the police
evidence custodian as accurately representing the evidence in his custod