NIT Goa PHD Rules
NIT Goa PHD Rules
NIT Goa PHD Rules
Ph.D. Programme
Academic Affairs
(2013-2014)
ORDINANCES
1. A candidate who has been qualified in the Degree of Master of Technology or Master of
Science (Technology/Engineering) [M.Tech /M.S/M.Sc.(Engg.)] or Master of Arts
from a recognized Institute or University in the discipline as prescribed in the rules and
regulations is eligible to apply for Ph.D. programme of National Institute of Technology
Goa. Exceptional candidates (with CGPA>=9.0) with B.Tech/B.E from a reputed
institute is also eligible to apply for the Ph.D. programme.
2. The award of the Ph.D. Degree shall be in accordance with the respective regulations of
the Senate of the Institute.
3. The award of the Ph.D. degree shall be made by the Institute on the recommendation of
the Senate and with the approval of the Board of Governors (BOG) of the Institute.
4. The Senate/BOG of the Institute has the power to modify any regulations stated from
time to time.
b. Admission schedule
Normally, advertisement for Ph.D. programmes is issued in the month of March (for
July session) and October (for December-January session) each year in the employment
news, department website as well as in leading newspapers. Admissions are carried out
in the months of July and December. Candidates seeking admission under this clause
must fulfill the required academic qualification/experience at the time of interview.
They must join within two weeks after the issue of admission offer unless specifically
permitted to do so. Admission is subject to vacancy being available in the relevant
specializations.
2
Qualification through
(*cut-off criteria for eligibility & shortlisting may vary with the departments)
f. Academic requirements
In order to overcome any deficiency in the breadth of fundamental training or proper
foundation for advanced work; special make up or pre-doctoral courses are to be
pursued by admitted candidates in each department. The candidate should approach the
supervisor for the courses that he/she needs to pursue. These courses should be
approved by the DRC. The course work may be completed on the basis of lectures/
self-study, as suggested by the supervisor and approved by the DRC.
4
incorporated by him/her. The DRC has to maintain adequate record of the candidate
progress and communicate the same to AAC at the end of every year.
g.6 Candidate will receive evaluation of his/her progress in each semester after registering
under the supervisor: “P” as satisfactory and “F” as not satisfactory. The DRC with
report/ comments from the members to the AAC at the end of every semester. If a
candidate gets “F” for the first time, the DRC warns the candidate and allows him/her to
proceed with the research work. In case the candidate gets “F” grade second time,
his/her case may be recommended by the DRC for termination of Ph.D. registration.
The recommendation should be forwarded in the form of report to the AAC.
g.7 Candidate may be allowed to present a pre-synopsis seminar and submit synopsis based
on the recommendations of the DRC. A pre-synopsis seminar can be allowed if he/she
has received reviews on at least one paper developed and communicated to a reputed
peer reviewed journal (preferably, SCI journal). At least one journal paper should be
accepted/ published in peer reviewed journal (preferably, SCI journal) prior to synopsis
seminar. A candidate may be allowed to repeat a pre-synopsis seminar based on the
recommendations of the DRC. In case if recommended for synopsis then, he/she must
submit the thesis within one year of successfully presenting the pre-synopsis seminar.
g.8 Based on the candidate’s performance in comprehensive and his/her research
contributions, the DRC in consultations with AAC can recommend a candidate to
submit his/ her synopsis within three years from the date of registration of Ph.D.
g.9 DRC will identify panel of minimum four examiners for the purpose of thesis
evaluation and communicate the same to AAC. This panel will comprise of names of
examiners from within and outside the country (four in each category). In each
category, it is strongly recommended that the Examiners/Reviewers be chosen from
reputed national and international Institutions. Assignment of thesis examiners and the
communication of reviews will be handled by the AAC.
g.10 The thesis defense will be decided based on the review reports received from the
examiners. The review recommendations may fall into the following categories:
If both the reports are positive, then the viva-voce examination can be
conducted.
If one is positive and another suggests minor revision, the candidate may be
asked to revise and send to the same reviewer provided the reviewer has asked
to send to him/her. If the reviewer has asked to revise and present in the viva
voce then the revisions should be incorporated and presented during the viva
voce. If one reviewer reports recommendation for strongly acceptance and any
other reviewer rejects, then Director’s decision is final in recommending for
viva-voce.
If one of the reviewers gives acceptance and other reviewer/s suggest major
revisions with the suggestion to send back to him/her, the candidate should
incorporate the comments and the revised thesis should be communicated. In
case, the revised thesis also receives negative comments then the thesis can be
5
sent to the third reviewer. If the revised thesis receives further negative
comments then Director’s decision is final in recommending for viva-voce.
If all the reviews are negative, the candidate should work and modify the thesis
and re-submit the revised thesis.
g.11 Thesis defense and viva-voce examination of the Candidate will be open to all. The
defense will be headed by Chairman DRC, DRC, Supervisor (s) and at least one
external Examiner (preferably, one of the Reviewers).