Sky Labs, LLC Second Superseding Formal Complaint
Sky Labs, LLC Second Superseding Formal Complaint
Sky Labs, LLC Second Superseding Formal Complaint
In the Matter of
2. Section 8(1)(d) of the MRTMA provides that the Administrative Rules must ensure
the health, safety, and security of the public and integrity of the marijuana establishment
operations.
ENF 22-00476
a. On November 18, 2021, Respondent had the following statewide monitoring
system (Metrc) tags fail safety compliance testing for Bifenthrin, a banned
chemical residue:
a. 1A4050300014ADD000015911
b. 1A4050300014ADD000015913
c. 1A4050300014ADD000017664
d. 1A4050300014ADD000017665
e. 1A4050300014ADD000017680
b. Bifenthrin has a half-life of two years.
c. On March 7, 2022, the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural
Development (MDARD) conducted an inspection at the marijuana grower
of the abovementioned products and did not detect any indication of the
banned chemical residues.
Count I
Respondent’s actions as described above demonstrate a violation of Mich Admin
Code, R 420.206(4), which states the agency shall publish a list of banned chemical
residue active ingredients that are prohibited from use in the cultivation and
production of marihuana plants and marihuana products to be sold or transferred
in accordance with the acts or these rules.
ENF 22-00414
a. On March 15, 2022, Respondent notified the CRA that its video surveillance
system experienced a system failure and as a result, it was shutting down
Count II
Respondent’s actions as described above demonstrate a violation of Mich Admin
Code, R 420.209(14)(a), which states that a licensee shall maintain a log of the
recordings, which includes all of the following: (a) The identity of the employee or
employees responsible for monitoring the video surveillance system.
Count III
Respondent’s actions as described above demonstrate a violation of Mich Admin
Code, R 420.209(14)(b), which states that a licensee shall maintain a log of the
recordings, which includes all of the following: (b) The identity of the employee who
removed any recording from the video surveillance system storage device and the
time and date removed.
Count IV
Respondent’s actions as described above demonstrate a violation of Mich Admin
Code, R 420.209(14)(c), which states that a licensee shall maintain a log of the
recordings, which includes all of the following: (c) The identity of the employee
who destroyed any recording.
Count V
Respondent’s actions as described above demonstrate a violation of Mich Admin
Code, R 420.206(11), which states all non-marihuana inactive ingredients must be
clearly listed on the product label. Inactive ingredients, other than botanically
derived terpenes that are chemically identical to the terpenes derived from the plant
Cannabis Sativa L., must be approved by the FDA for the intended use, and the
concentration must be less than the maximum concentration listed in the FDA
Inactive Ingredient database for the intended use.
ENF 22-00556
a. On June 23, 2022, Respondent distributed Chewii Sour Cherry Edibles to
employees of the adult use processor establishment. Ten employees each
received one package containing 20 pieces each.
b. Respondent admitted the packages of Chewii Sour Cherry Edibles were
mislabeled and as a result, were distributed to employees as trade
samples.
c. The labels on the Chewii Sour Cherry Edibles displayed a large sticker
showing “200 MG CBD.” Respondent did not place a THC amount or
Count VI
Respondent’s actions as described above demonstrate a violation of Mich Admin
Code, R 420.103(3), which states a marihuana processor shall enter all
transactions, current inventory, and other information into the statewide monitoring
system as required in these rules.
Count VII
Respondent’s actions as described above demonstrate a violation of Mich Admin
Code, R 420.214b(1), which states a licensee shall notify the agency within 1
business day of becoming aware or within 1 business day of when the licensee
should have been aware of any adverse reactions to a marihuana product sold or
Count VIII
Respondent’s actions as described above demonstrate a violation Mich Admin
Code, R 420.214b(2), which states a licensee shall enter into the statewide
monitoring system within 1 business day of becoming aware of or within 1 business
day of when the licensee should have been aware of any adverse reactions to a
marihuana product sold or transferred by any licensee.
Count IX
Respondent’s actions as described above demonstrate a violation Mich Admin
Code, R 420.403(1), which states a producer shall package and properly label
marihuana-infused products before sale or transfer.
Count X
Respondent’s actions as described above demonstrate a violation Mich Admin
Code, R 420.403(3), which states a producer of marihuana-infused products shall
list and record the THC concentration and CBD concentration of marihuana-infused
products, as provided in R 420.305 and R 420.404, in the statewide monitoring
system and indicate the THC concentration and CBD concentration on the label
along with the tag identification as required under these rules.
Count XI
Respondent’s actions as described above demonstrate a violation Mich Admin
Code, R 420.403(7)(a), which states a producer shall label all marihuana-infused
products with all of the following: (a) The name of the marihuana-infused product
that includes a product modifier such as “marijuana product”, “THC product” or
“cannabis product” using the same or larger font than the product name.
Count XII
Respondent’s actions as described above demonstrate a violation Mich Admin
Count XIII
Respondent’s actions as described above demonstrate a violation Mich Admin
Code, R 420.509(3), which states a licensee shall record the transfer of an internal
product sample in the statewide monitoring system.
THEREFORE, based on the above, the CRA gives notice of its intent to impose fines
and/or other sanctions against Respondent’s license, which may include the suspension,
revocation, restriction, and/or refusal to renew Respondent’s license.
Under MCL 333.27957 (1)(c) and Mich Admin Code R 420.704(2), any party
aggrieved by an action of the CRA suspending, revoking, restricting, or refusing to renew
a license, or imposing a fine, shall be given a hearing upon request. A request for a
hearing must be submitted to the CRA in writing within 21 days after service of this
complaint. Notice served by certified mail is considered complete on the business day
following the date of the mailing.
Respondent also has the right to request a compliance conference under Mich Admin
Code 420.704(1). A compliance conference is an informal meeting at which Respondent
has the opportunity to discuss the allegations in this complaint and demonstrate
compliance under the MRTMA and/or the Administrative Rules. A compliance conference
request must be submitted to the CRA in writing.
By Email: CRA-LegalHearings@michigan.gov
The formal complaint filed against the Respondent on August 17, 2022, is hereby
WITHDRAWN and replaced in full by this superseding complaint.
PROOF OF SERVICE
12/28/22
I hereby certify that on _______________________, I mailed a copy of the First
12/28/22
Superseding Formal Complaint dated _____________________ in the above captioned
Departmental Technician
Cannabis Regulatory Agency
Department of Licensing & Regulatory
Affairs