Crypto Against
Crypto Against
Crypto Against
But decentralized blockchain technology is still relatively new, and we’re still figuring
out how to best use and regulate it. In the meantime, some criminals have been able to
take advantage of the anonymity offered by crypto to scam users, who may have little
recourse to reclaim their assets.
Cryptos themselves can also be quite scammy in nature. This was the case with the Squid
Game token, which had a built-in mechanism that prevented many holders from reselling
their tokens.
In addition, cryptocurrency taxation is in its infancy, and future changes could have
ramifications for your investments.
5. Diversity is key
There are thousands of cryptocurrencies, and many of them are still in the earlier stages
of development. It’s still difficult to tell the ultimate winners from the losers.
As with risky investments in general, it’s never a great idea to put all your eggs in one
basket. If you choose to invest in cryptocurrency, it could be better to spread your
investment across a variety of different cryptos.
Highly Unpredictable Value: Virtual currencies are easy to create and spread in the
market quickly. Their underlying value is highly subjective and unpredictable. As a
result, prices can swing wildly upward and crash without warning or any change in the
real economy.
Difficult to Cash Out Investments: Virtual currencies are not traded on traditional
exchanges by established financial institutions. If you purchase one of these virtual
currencies, you might not be able to find a buyer for it when you want to sell.
Increased Risk of Market Manipulation: Many virtual currency trading platforms have
few, if any, rules about insider trading or other protections available to traders on
traditional stock exchanges. In addition, many trading platform operators are not
appropriately monitoring for market manipulation or other harmful trading activity.
VCs being in digital form are stored in digital/electronic media that are called
electronic wallets. Therefore, they are prone to losses arising out of hacking, loss
of password, compromise of access credentials, malware attack etc. Since they are
not created by or traded through any authorised central registry or agency, the loss
of the e-wallet could result in the permanent loss of the VCs held in them.
Payments by VCs, such as Bitcoins, take place on a peer-to-peer basis without an
authorised central agency which regulates such payments. As such, there is no
established framework for recourse to customer problems / disputes / charge backs
etc.
There is no underlying or backing of any asset for VCs. As such, their value seems
to be a matter of speculation. Huge volatility in the value of VCs has been noticed
in the recent past. Thus, the users are exposed to potential losses on account of
such volatility in value.
It is reported that VCs, such as Bitcoins, are being traded on exchange platforms
set up in various jurisdictions whose legal status is also unclear. Hence, the traders
of VCs on such platforms are exposed to legal as well as financial risks.
There have been several media reports of the usage of VCs, including Bitcoins, for
illicit and illegal activities in several jurisdictions. The absence of information of
counterparties in such peer-to-peer anonymous/ pseudonymous systems could
subject the users to unintentional breaches of anti-money laundering and
combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) laws.