Origins of Multicellularity
Origins of Multicellularity
Origins of Multicellularity
can cycle from one state to another when main- in mind is the relevance of a study to tumour The rocks have been dated with great precision
tained under conditions that support stem growth in patients. ■ (to 2,100 ± 30 million years old), and the pos-
cells. This highlights the fact that stochastic Peter Dirks is at the Hospital for Sick Children, sibility that the structures are a younger min-
influences may be at work within stem-cell University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, eral assemblage that grew within the rock has
populations8. Roesch and colleagues’ results Canada. been excluded by sulphur-isotope analyses.
will be crucial if the same principles apply to e-mail: peter.dirks@sickkids.ca These indicate that the fossil-replacing min-
patients’ primary tumours that have not been eral pyrite (an iron sulphide) was precipitated
1. Boiko, A. D. et al. Nature 466, 133–137 (2010).
maintained in culture. 2. Roesch, A. et al. Cell 141, 583–594 (2010).
by sulphate-reducing bacteria as the sediments
The field of cancer-stem-cell research is 3. Quintana, E. et al. Nature 456, 593–598 (2008). were deposited. Further, contrasts between the
young and emerging, so it is not surprising that 4. Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Cell 126, 663–676 (2006). carbon-isotope signature of the structures and
many questions remain. Each study must be 5. Hamburger, A. W. & Salmon, S. E. Science 197, 461–463 (1977). their surrounding sediment indicate that the
6. Lee, J. et al. Cancer Cell 9, 391–403 (2006).
carefully assessed, particularly when consider- 7. Hayashi, K., Lopes, S. M., Tang, F. & Surani, M. A. Cell Stem
pyrite grew in an organic framework.
ing the experimental methodology and models Cell 3, 391–401 (2008). However, it is the fossil morphology, revealed
used. One point that should always be borne 8. Chang, H. H. et al. Nature 453, 544–547 (2008). through X-ray microtomography, that provides
the most compelling evidence of biogenicity.
The fossils take the form of three-dimensional
sheets with scalloped margins defined by radial
EARLY LIFE slits and an internal radial fabric (as seen in
Origins of multicellularity
Fig. 4 of the paper on page 102). The authors
interpret this structure as evidence of coordi-
nated growth. The relative complexity of the
fossils, and their co-occurrence with solu-
Philip C. J. Donoghue and Jonathan B. Antcliffe ble organic compounds containing sterane
Interpreting truly ancient fossils is an especially tricky business. (derived from sterol precursors), lead El Albani
and colleagues to conclude that they are unlike
The conclusion that 2.1-billion-year-old structures from Gabon are the any living bacterium. They don’t rule out the
remains of large colonial organisms will get palaeobiologists talking. possibility that these remains might even rep-
resent the earliest multicellular eukaryotes
It is a peculiar but widely held view that modern levels. This bacterial world was under- — that is, colonies of organisms with a mem-
Charles Darwin used the palaeontological going the greatest episode of climate change in brane-bound nucleus that represent a distinct,
record as one of the principal lines of evi- the history of the planet: pumping out oxygen, more complex form of life from bacteria.
dence for biological evolution. He did not. To drawing down carbon dioxide, slowly trans- The null hypothesis, however, has to be
modern eyes, On the Origin of Species presents forming the Earth into the world we know. that these remains represent bacterial colo-
a shocking account of the fossil record as an The fossils are not much to look at — yet, nies. Future work must determine whether
archive of evolutionary history. given their antiquity, the fact that they can be the sterane signature, a hallmark of eukary-
For instance, Darwin highlights the idea seen by the naked eye is astonishing. Out of otes, is derived from soluble organics gener-
that the then earliest-known fossil-bearing their geological context, these structures are ated within the sediments, or whether they
rocks, from the Cambrian period, beginning unremarkable and would probably have been migrated into these sediments from younger
about 542 million years ago, contain records ignored. But the geological context is as remark- rock sequences.
of modern groups — implying an extensive able as are the potential evolutionary implica- In the interim, however, is there anything in
prehistory teeming with life. One-and-a-half tions. El Albani and colleagues1 have, therefore, the geometry of these presumed multicellular
centuries of subsequent research have revealed been painstaking in attempting to demonstrate sheets that sets them apart from bacterial
a vast microscopic fossil record of unicellular the age and biological nature of the structures. colonies? Multicellularity represents one
protists and bacteria extending, some would
argue, as far back as there are sedimentary Hitherto oldest record of macroscopic multicellularity
rocks from which they could be recovered. But Gabon fossils Probable eukaryotic fossils
although fossils of millimetre- to metre-scale Oldest certain bacterial fossils Ediacara biota
multicellular organisms characterize the 90 mil- Earliest stromatolites Oldest unequivocal animal fossils
lion years of the Ediacaran period that precedes 0
Atmosphere
Oxygen level (log scale)
of the principal thresholds in evolutionary than it answers. But within the confines of a change in free energy as an enzyme and inhibi-
history2. This threshold has been exceeded very patchy global record of Proterozoic and tor are brought together is difficult, owing to
tens of times3, perhaps because much of the Archaean rocks, which extend from about the flexibility of the two components and the
requisite molecular machinery to facilitate 3.8 billion years ago to the beginning of the changes in their hydration (the arrangement
cell–cell coordination is a shared primitive Cambrian, these remains contribute to a fossil of water molecules around them) that occur
feature of living organisms4, but also because record that belies the dated caricature painted on binding2. So alternative approaches are
some definitions of multicellularity encompass in the Origin. It was Darwin’s view that absence being explored. In a popular one, known as
everything from simple bacterial colonies to of organisms in these early intervals of Earth’s double decoupling, the free-energy changes
badgers. Stricter definitions of multicellularity history would prove his theory of biological associated with making the inhibitor ‘disap-
are met in far fewer instances. Although the evolution wrong. The discovery and continu- pear’ from the complex with the enzyme and
fossils are macroscopic, they do not seem to ing elucidation of the Precambrian fossil record for making the inhibitor disappear in bulk
represent anything other than the basic type of has met Darwin’s predictions on the extent and water are computed. The difference in these
multicellularity, which occurs earlier in time in structure of evolutionary history. ■ results yields ΔGb. However, such calculations
the form of stromatolites. Philip C. J. Donoghue and Jonathan B. Antcliffe are still computationally taxing and are often
Nevertheless, the size, form and thickness are in the Department of Earth Sciences, imprecise for compounds as large as typical
of these sheets may be significant. It has been University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, drugs. It is easier to compute the differences
argued that the paucity of ancient records of Queen’s Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK. in ΔGb for structurally similar inhibitors, and
macroscopic multicellularity could reflect the e-mail: phil.donoghue@bristol.ac.uk this approach has been used with much suc-
physiological limitations enforced by atmos- cess in guiding the discovery of, for example,
pheric and oceanic chemistry during the first 1. El Albani, A. et al. Nature 466, 100–104 (2010). potent anti-HIV agents3. Nevertheless, there is
2. Maynard Smith, J. & Szathmáry, E. The Major Transitions in
2 billion years of Earth’s history5,6. The proxim- Evolution (Oxford Univ. Press, 1997).
a pressing need for new methods that address
ity in the age of these fossils to the timing of 3. Butterfield, N. J. Precambr. Res. 173, 201–211 (2009). the binding problem.
the Great Oxidation Event (Fig. 1) fits elegantly 4. Shapiro, J. A. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 52, 81–104 (1998). It is against this backdrop that Colizzi et al.1
with speculative hypotheses on the co-evolu- 5. Anbar, A. D. & Knoll, A. H. Science 297, 1137–1142 (2002). report their new approach for gaining insight
6. Bengtson, S., Rasmussen, B. & Krapez, B. Paleobiology 33,
tion of life and the chemistry of the oceans. 351–381 (2007). into protein–ligand binding affinities. Mimick-
This latest discovery raises more questions 7. Anbar, A. D. Science 322, 1481–1483 (2008). ing single-molecule pulling experiments and
simulations4, they used ‘steered’ molecular
dynamics (SMD) to compute the force that is
required to extract inhibitors from complexes
DRUG DISCOvERY with enzymes. To model each extraction,