Page

1
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW
FORM

Name of Employee: JED A. NIEVES Name of Rater: WILSON H. INDING

Position: Education Program Specialist II – SMM & E Position: SEPS/ SMM&E
Review Period: January 2022 – December 2022 Date of Review: December 31, 2022
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Schools Division of Zamboanga del Norte
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED IN DURING
EVALUATION

MFO’S KRA’S OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE*
PER (Quality, Efficiency,
KRA Q E T Ave
Timeliness)
QUALITY
Basic Education QUALITY 1. To assist in gathering data Jan – Dec 40 %
Services MANAGEMENT and provide technical 2023 5 - 86-100% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
SYSTEM support in implementing 4 - 76-85% of the physical and financial
quality management system targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
3 - 66-75% of the physical and financial
to wit: targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
1.1. Assisted in Preparing and 2 - 51-65% of the physical and financial
submission of report of targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
1 - 50% Below, of the physical and
findings on implementation of financial targets in the unit AIP are
quality assurance processes achieved
on:
a. School Planning/
EFFICIENCY
SIP/ESRC;
b. School Based 5 – 5 systems are established to
Management implement, monitor and evaluate the
c. Implementation of PAPs
4 – 4 systems are established to
Programs and Projects as implement, monitor and evaluate the
basis for continuous PAPs
improvement.
1.2. Assisted in defining the TIMELINESS
approach and methods to 5 – Communicated the results/data at
validate SDO report on least before scheduled deadline
Schools Achievement and 4- Communicated the results
Learning outcomes and within on scheduled deadline
3 – Communicated the results/data on
submit reoprt on findings. Schedule or deadline
1.3. Assisted in Monitoring of 2 – Communicated data after scheduled
Page

2 performance of the Schools deadline

1 – Never at all
Division along:
a.TA to Schools and LCs
b. Equitable Distribution of
educational resources to
schools and LCs and submit
reports to be able to identify
areas for improvement.
1.4. Assisted in Preparing
report/documents on best
practices with regard school
management and
governance for sharing and
benchmarking purposes and
inputs to recognition.

2. To assist in gathering data,

submit assessment report/s for
Jan – Dec 15 % QUALITY
Page

3
ASSESSMENT policy recommendation and for 2023 5 – Performed all indicators
continuous improvement to wit: 4 – Performed indicators but one was not
2.1 Assisted in designing 3 – Performed indicators but two were
not
the approach and 2 – Performed indicators but three were
methods for gathering not
1 – Performed indicators but four were
data and prepare a not or none at all
report on the monitoring QUALITY

and evaluation result of

the implementation of 5 - 86-100% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
Division assessment
program aligned to 4 - 76-85% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
national assessment
framework; 3 - 66-75% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
2.2 Assisted in validating
and authenticating 2 - 51-65% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
assessment strategies
and tools for utilization 1 - 50% Below, of the physical and
financial targets in the unit AIP are
by schools, in achieved
classrooms and learning
center and submit report EFFICIENCY
to SDO management on
5 – 5 systems are established to
its utilization and result implement, monitor and evaluate the
of utilization. PAPs
4 – 4 systems are established to
2.3 Assisted in preparing implement, monitor and evaluate the
and submission of PAPs

reports on assessment 3 – 3 systems are established to

results for tracking implement, monitor and evaluate the
PAPs ;
learner progress and for 2 – 2 systems are established to
grading purpose to implement, monitor and evaluate the
PAPs ;
establish validity and
reliability of method. 1 – 1 system is established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the unit
2.4 Assisted in conducting PAPs ;
monitoring and
evaluation of the
conduct of national,
regional and division
assessment tests to TIMELINESS
Page

4
identify issues and 5 – Communicated the results/data at
concerns arising and least before scheduled deadline
help improve the 4- Communicated the results
within on scheduled deadline
process. 3 – Communicated the results/data on
2.5 Assisted in preparing Schedule or deadline
2 – Communicated data after scheduled
and implementing the deadline
process for monitoring 1 – Never at all

and evaluating the

organizational
effectiveness of the
schools division office
and submit a report to
document process and
recommendations for
continuous
improvement.

3. To assist in obtaining 100%

compliance to standards over
the requests of public and
private schools, vis-a-vis,
3.1. Assisted in Renewing of Jan – Dec 15%
PTO of 30 private 2023
schools; QUALITY
Page

5
SCHOOL 3.2. Assisted in validating of
COMPLIANCE TO documents of schools 5 - 86-100% of the physical and financial
QUALITY requesting Permit To targets in the unit AIP are achieved;

STANDARDS Operate; 4 - 76-85% of the physical and financial

(Public and 3.3. Assisted in Conducting targets in the unit AIP are achieved;

Private) of Information, 3 - 66-75% of the physical and financial

Education and targets in the unit AIP are achieved;

Advocacy Programs 2 - 51-65% of the physical and financial

and Materials for targets in the unit AIP are achieved;

Accreditation 1 - 50% Below, of the physical and

Standards; financial targets in the unit AIP are
achieved
3.4. Assisted in the
endorsement of
EFFICIENCY
Request for School
Fees Increase; 5 – 5 systems are established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the
3.5. Assisted in processing PAPs
and endorsing of 4 – 4 systems are established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the
Special Order PAPs
applications of 14 non-
3 – 3 systems are established to
DepEd schools; implement, monitor and evaluate the
3.6. Assisted in endorsing PAPs ;
2 – 2 systems are established to
documents for implement, monitor and evaluate the
Establishment/Integrati PAPs ;

on of Schools and 1 – 1 system is established to

Conversion of School implement, monitor and evaluate the unit
PAPs ;
into an Implementing
Unit (Pre-Evaluation),
TIMELINESS
all of which require:
A. Issued relevant 5 – Communicated the results/data at
least before scheduled deadline
Memoranda to 4- Communicated the results
communicate all within on scheduled deadline
3 – Communicated the results/data on
concerned Schedule or deadline
B. Conducted Initial 2 – Communicated data after scheduled
deadline
evaluation of 1 – Never at all
application documents
C. Communicated results
of initial evaluation of
Page

6
documents
D. Finalized evaluation of
documents
E. Conduct of ocular
inspection, whenever
applicable
F. Endorsement of
documents to RO or to
any other entity for
action or for approval
G. Transmittal of acted
documents or issued
certificate from the
approving office to the
concerned school

4. To conduct action research

related to SBM, to wit:
4.1 Assisted in Crafting
research manuscript
4.2 Assisted in developing
questionnaires and tools Jan – Dec 5%
4.3 assisted in the 2023
presentation of the reasech
RESEARCH AND materials for TA to the panel
DEVELOPMENT 4.4 Assisted in QUALITY
Page

7
administration of the 5 - 86-100% of the physical and financial
research survey targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
4.5 Assisted in presentation 4 - 76-85% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
of results to the DRC 3 - 66-75% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
2 - 51-65% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
1 - 50% Below, of the physical and
financial targets in the unit AIP are
achieved

EFFICIENCY

5 – 5 systems are established to

implement, monitor and evaluate the
PAPs
4 – 4 systems are established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the
PAPs
3 – 3 systems are established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the
PAPs ;
2 – 2 systems are established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the
PAPs ;
1 – 1 system is established to
implement, monitor and evaluate the unit
PAPs ;

TIMELINESS

5 – Communicated the results/data at

least before scheduled deadline
4- Communicated the results
5. To assist in providing within on scheduled deadline
substantial and procedural 3 – Communicated the results/data on
Schedule or deadline
technical assistance to 2 – Communicated data after scheduled
schools and learning deadline
1 – Never at all
centers relative to their
accreditation requests,
participation to 20 %
assessments, and other Jan – Dec
areas covered by QMS and 2023
TECHNICAL
ASSISTANCE TO compliance to standards,
SCHOOLS AND thru:
QUALITY
Page

8
LEARNING 5.2. Assisted in Providing 5 - 86-100% of the physical and financial
CENTER individualized/walk-in targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
tecnical assistance 4 - 76-85% of the physical and financial
targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
support services; 3 - 66-75% of the physical and financial
5.3. Assisted in Providing targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
2 - 51-65% of the physical and financial
relevant TA through the targets in the unit AIP are achieved;
use of technology as 1 - 50% Below, of the physical and
financial targets in the unit AIP are
medium; achieved
5.4. Assisted in conducting
of conference with EFFICIENCY
school administrators 5 – 5 systems are established to
and school heads ; esp implement, monitor and evaluate the
. from the applicant PAPs
4 – 4 systems are established to
schools for the implement, monitor and evaluate the
Updating of SM ME PAPs
3 – 3 systems are established to
Policies and implement, monitor and evaluate the
Regulations; PAPs ;
2 – 2 systems are established to
5.5. Assisted in implement, monitor and evaluate the
Capacitating building of PAPs ;
1 – 1 system is established to
SMME field implement, monitor and evaluate the unit
counterparts; PAPs ;

5.6. Provided TA feedbacks

based on the actual TIMELINESS

ocular inspection 5 – Communicated the results/data at

Designated as: least before scheduled deadline
4- Communicated the results
within on scheduled deadline
1. Member of the 3 – Communicated the results/data on
Infrastructure Schedule or deadline
2 – Communicated data after scheduled
Inspectorate team; deadline
2. TWG Establishment of 1 – Never at all
the SDO II of 5%
Zamboanga del No
Jan – Dec
2023
Other Related
Functions
Page

9 5– 100% (Outstanding: Role Model)

Performance represents an extraordinary
level of achievement in terms of quality and
time, technical skills and knowledge,
ingenuity, creativity, and initiative. Employees
at this performance level have demonstrated
exceptional job.
4– 85%-99% (Very Satisfactory:Consistently
Demonstrate)
3- 70%-84% (Satisfactory: Most of the Time
Demonstrates)
100% 2-55%-69% (Unsatisfactory: Sometimes
Demonstrates)
1-54% and below (Poor:Rarely
Demonstrates) Performance was not
TOTAL consistently below expectations and/or
reasonable progress toward critical goals was
not made. Significant improvement is needed
in one or more important areas.
 To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

Rater: Ratee: Approving Authority:

WILSON H. INDING JED A. NIEVES JOY E. LETRAN - SINGSON

Senior Education Program Specialist, SMM & E Education Program Specialist II, SMM & E Chief Education Supervisor, SGOD