FSA Session 12
FSA Session 12
FSA Session 12
Current Year Total Contract Value (Pro forma) 3,900 25,619 42,769 56,385
Balance Sheet
Assets
cash (b/F) 1670 1670 1670 1670
Receivables 1800 1800 1800 1800
Cl. Inventory at Cost 700 700
cl. Inventory at M.V. 900 790
4170 4170 4370 4260
Liabilities
Initital capital 3000 3000 3000 3000
Retained earnings 990 810 1080 1080
Accrued Sales comm. 180 180 270 180
Accrued Shipment 20
deferred Revenue 180
4170 4170 4370 4260
b) The installment method delays the reporting of revenues and thereby delays the time for payment of taxes.
The time value of money is a major motivation for delaying cash payments for taxes.
c) Balance Sheet: Some Analysts prefer the installment method because it is more conservative. However, the
installment method attempts to value receivables (less deferred income) at the historical cost of inventory.
It would appear that the credit analysis should be future-oriented and view receivables at the expected future
cash inflow.
Income Statement: Some analysts prefer the installement method because it is more conservative. However,
this method has two critical weaknesses:
1. Revenues and profits are not recognized when performance (earning) occurs;instead, recognition is delayed
until cash is collected.
2. Selling costs are mismatched (this is most dramatic in a period of rapid growth or decline in sales).
(2) Improperly capitalizing and amortizing expenses related to attracting new members: This behavior would be difficult t
understand the growth in reported intangible assets and deferred charges, and to assess its reasonableness. Unusual
potential red flag.
(3) Recording fictitious sales: One key to uncovering fictitious sales is to monitor the joint behavior of sales and accounts
Increasing sales should not necessarily lead to slower accounts receivable turnover. Increases in the accounts receiva
investigated because this can be caused by, among other factors, the recognition of fictitious or uncollectible sales.
b. The external auditor must conduct the audit according to generally accepted auditing standards. The culpability of audit
case by case basis. It is often difficult to detect a fraud if key client personnel are colluding and conspiring to cover up. H
was so widespread that auditor negligence is part of the problem. From an economic perspective, this question will ultim
Cl. Inventory at M.V. Amount ($)
Sales (100 units @ 9) 900
less: sales comm. (100*9*10%) 90
less: shippment (100*0.20) 20
790
Beg. Inventory 0
Add: Purchases (1200@7) 8400
less: cl. Inventory at M.V. 790
COGS 7610
Cash
Initial Investment 3000
Add: collection (900*9) 8100
11100
less: COGS (1200@7) 8400
less: selling commission (900*9*10% 810
less: shipment (1100*0.20) 220
Cash in hand 1670
Deferred Revenue
Sales (200 units@9) 1800
less: COGS (200@7) 1400
less: selling comm (200*9*10%) 180
less: shipment (200*0.20) 40
180
e conservative. However,
decline in sales).
tions: An accounts receivable analysis would be the focal point
ounts receivable or unusual (unexplained) write-offs of receivables.
uld potentially identify a problem area or fraudulent behavior.