0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views1 page

SC-TD-017-fouling Vs Cleanliness

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 1

Tranter PHE, Inc. P.O.

Box 2289
Phn: (940) 723-7125
http://www.tranter.com
Wichita Falls, TX 76307
Fax: (940) 723-5131
Technical Data
Fouling Factors

At times, there is confusion as to exactly what fouling factors should be used for plate and frame type
heat exchangers. Many engineers insist on using the fouling factor developed for shell and tube units by
the Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association (TEMA). This bulletin seeks to explain why this may
not be the proper approach.

As you are aware, the turbulence-inducing patterns of Superchanger plates produce local velocities
ranging from 1 to 5 fps. These velocities result in high shearing. This high shear characteristic
decreases the tendency of plate and frame units to foul as quickly as tubular type units.

In fact, Heat Transfer Research Incorporated (HTRI) has developed data that shows the fouling build-up
on plate and frame units is significantly lower than tubular type exchangers in typical cooling water
applications (F = 0.00015 hr ft2 °F / BTU versus F = 0.001 hr ft2 °F / BTU respectively).

Since plate and frame units have lower fouling tendencies than tubular units, TEMA fouling resistance
factors should not be used for plate and frame units, because they will be several time larger than
necessary.

Specifying too large a fouling factor can create problems rather than provide a solution. For one, the unit
will be oversized with more channels in parallel than necessary. This results in a unit with more surface
area than required, and a much higher price. Also, an oversized unit will have lower velocities than one
properly sized. This results in increased fouling and the attendant need to clean the unit more frequently.

Although fouling factors are an important consideration when designing a plate and frame heat
exchanger, they often receive too much emphasis. Fouling resistances, when specified, should not result
in a design that causes the unit to be more than 25% oversized. An excess of 25% in oversurfacing will
result in premature fouling.

An alternative to a fouling factor is to specify a cleanliness factor. Even then, care must be taken not to
specify a cleanliness factor lower than 0.75. Typical plate and frame designs for most industrial fluids and
waters utilize a safety factor of 5% – 10%. Utilizing a greater percentage indicates that the fluid is a high
fouling liquid.

Remember, that regardless of fluid type, a Superchanger plate and frame heat exchanger will always
clean easier than a shell and tube unit.

SC-TD-017 1 July 2000

You might also like