Mdrsjrns v9n2p99 en
Mdrsjrns v9n2p99 en
Mdrsjrns v9n2p99 en
99
CITATION LINKS
[1] Rossolini GM, Mantengoli E. Treatment and control of severe ... [2] Moradali MF,
Ghods S, Rehm BH. Pseudomonas aeruginosa lifest ... [3] Karlowsky JA, Jones ME,
Thornsberry C, Evangelista AT, Yee Y ... [4] Brzozowski M, Krukowska Ż� , Galant K, Jursa-
Kulesza J, Kosik- ... [5] Foumani AA, Kalurazi TY, Rostami FM, Ebrahim-Saraie HS, Naza
... [6] Strateva T, Yordanov D. Pseudomonas aeruginosa - a phenomeno ... [7] Parsa P,
* Correspondence Amirmozafari N, Nowruzi B, Bahar MA. Molecular char ... [8] Sorkh MA, Shokoohizadeh
Department of Microbiology, Fala- L, Rashidi N, Tajbakhsh E. Molecular ... [9] Heidari H, Halaji M, Taji A, Kazemian H, Abadi
varjan Branch, Islamic Azad Univer- MS, Taheripou ... [10] Faridi F, Javadpour S. REP-PCR typing, antibiogram pattern, ... [11]
sity, Isfahan, Iran Faghri J, Nouri S, Jalalifar S, Zalipoor M, Halaji M. Invest ... [12] Clinical and Laboratory
E-mail: La.Hoveida@iau.ac.ir Standards Institute. M100-S30: Perfo ... [13] Halaji M, Shahidi S, Atapour A, Ataei B,
Feizi A, Havaei SA. ... [14] Rashno Taee S, Khansarinejad B, Abtahi H, Najafimosleh M,
Gh ... [15] Raman G, Avendano EE, Chan J, Merchant S, Puzniak L. Risk fa ... [16] Nikbin
How to cite this article VS, Aslani MM, Sharafi Z, Hashemipour M, Shahcheraghi ... [17] Khan AA, Cerniglia CE.
Delroshan M., Ghandehari F., Detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa f ... [18] Ranjbar R, Owlia P, Saderi H, Mansouri
Mirzaei R., Hoveida L. Molecular S, Jonaidi-Jafari N, ... [19] Khosravi AD, Motahar M, Abbasi Montazeri E. The frequency
Typing of Multidrug-Resistant of ... [20] Mobaraki S, Aghazadeh M, Barhaghi MH, Memar MY, Goli HR, Gho ... [21]
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Goli HR, Nahaei MR, Rezaee MA, Hasani A, Kafil HS, Aghazadeh ... [22] Fazeli H, Solgi
Obtained from Hospitalized Burn H, Havaei SA, Shokri D, Norouzi Barogh M, Za ... [23] Kashfi M, Hashemi A, Eslami G,
Patients by Rep-PCR. Infection
Sadredin Amin M, Tarashi S, T ... [24] Banar M, Emaneini M, Satarzadeh M, Abdellahi
Epidemiology and Microbiology.
2023;9(2): 99-106. N, Beigverdi R, ... [25] Zarei-Yazdeli M, Eslami G, Zandi H, Kiani M, Barzegar K, Ali ...
[26] Coetzee E, Rode H, Kahn D. Pseudomonas aeruginosa burn wound ... [27] Singh
[ DOI: 10.52547/iem.9.2.99 ]
NP, Goyal R, Manchanda V, Das S, Kaur I, Talwar V. Cha ... [28] Song W, Lee KM, Kang HJ,
Shin DH, Kim DK. Microbiologic aspe ... [29] Vaez H, Salehi-Abargouei A, Ghalehnoo ZR,
Khademi F. Multidr ... [30] Tarafdar F, Jafari B, Azimi T. Evaluating the antimicrobial
Article History ... [31] Khan F, Khan A, Kazmi SU. Prevalence and susceptibility patt ... [32] Mirzaei
Received: December 13, 2022 B, Bazgir ZN, Goli HR, Iranpour F, Mohammadi F, Baba ... [33] Doléans-Jordheim A,
Accepted: June 03, 2023 Cournoyer B, Bergeron E, Croizé J, Salor ...
Published: August 19, 2023
Copyright@ 2023, TMU Press. This open-access article is published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0
International License which permits Share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and Adapt (remix, transform, and build
upon the material) under the Attribution-NonCommercial terms.
Molecular typing of P. aeruginosa 100
for local typing of Gram-negative enteric colistin. Non-susceptibility to at least one agent
bacteria [8, 9]. It is an extragenic typing in three or more antibiotic chemical classes
technique that targets bacterial genomic was defined as multidrug resistance (MDR).
areas of repetitive non-coding sequences Genomic DNA was extracted by a simple
[10]
. Given the significance of P. aeruginosa boiling method according to the method
infections in patients with burn injuries, previously described [13]. PCR was performed
little information is available about the to detect the toxA gene using specific
molecular characteristics of these isolates in primers [14]. PCR amplification included an
nosocomial infections. initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 5 min,
Objectives: The purpose of this study was followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at
to determine genotypic relationships and 95 °C for 60 s, annealing at 68 °C for 45 s,
distribution of antibiotic resistance among and extension at 72 °C for 1 min. The final
P. aeruginosa isolates obtained from burn extension step was performed at 72 °C for 5
patients in a teaching burn hospital in Ahvaz, min. After electrophoresis of amplification
southern Iran. products on 1% agarose gel (with safe stain
dye (CinnaGen Co. Iran)), the presence of
[ DOI: 10.52547/iem.9.2.99 ]
GTG GTG GTG GTG GTG-3'. For molecular to all antibiotics, except colistin, and only
typing of P. aeruginosa isolates, rep-PCR one out of 70 isolates was susceptible to all
was done as described previously [14]. tested antibiotics. The susceptibility rates
Genetic relationships among P. aeruginosa of the isolates to the studied antibiotics are
isolates were analyzed using GelJ software presented in Table 1.
Version 2.0, and isolates with a similarity Dendrogram and gel electrophoresis images
coefficient equal to or above 80% were of rep-PCR products are showed in Figure 1.
classified into the same genotypes. The number of fragments varied from 3 to
10 per strain, and the size of rep-PCR bands
Findings ranged from 100 to 1.5 kb. In this study, out
During the 7-month study period, 70 P. of 70 P. aeruginosa isolates, 10 isolates did
aeruginosa isolates were obtained. Overall, not show any product in the reactions and
out of 70 confirmed P. aeruginosa isolates thereby were non-typeable. Rep-PCR typing
from various clinical specimens, 51.5 revealed that 60 P. aeruginosa strains were
and 48.5% were obtained from male and classified into 49 GTG5 types (G1-G49).
female patients, respectively. Most of the According to the 80% cut off point, these
isolates were obtained from burn-wound types were grouped into 12 clusters (A-L)
biopsy samples (63%), followed by blood and 10 isolates with unique banding patterns
culture (27%), wound swab (5.7%), and and distinct genotypes not belonging to any
sputum (4.3%) specimens. According to the cluster. Some P. aeruginosa strains were
findings, 51.4% of the strains were isolated 100% similar in terms of electrophoretic
from patients in the intensive care unit band pattern, and as a result, these strains
(ICU). were classified in a GTG, such as G24, G34,
Among 70 P. aeruginosa isolates, resistance and G40. Cluster A was the most common
to gentamicin was the most prevalent rep-type, including 11 (18.3%) isolates,
(95.8%), followed by imipenem (94.3%) followed by cluster B (eight isolates, 13.3%)
[ Downloaded from iem.modares.ac.ir on 2023-11-19 ]
and piperacillin– tazobactam (92.8%). None and C (seven isolates, 11.6%). However,
of the isolates were found to be resistant the rep-PCR analysis results showed
to colistin. According to MDR definition, high genetic diversity among most of the
66 (94%) isolates were identified as MDR, examined strains. The distribution of rep-
most of which belonged to the ICU ward. types in different hospital wards is shown in
Moreover, 52 (74%) isolates were resistant Table 2.
Table 1) Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of P. aeruginosa isolates obtained from burn patients in this study
Colistin 70 (100) - -
Table 2) Frequency of rep types of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in different hospital wards
Rep-Types
(No. of Isolates)
Wards (No.)
A B C D E F G H I J K L Unique
ICU (29) 7 4 4 1 2 3 2 2 2 2
Pediatric (10) 1 1 1 2 1 4
Men (10) 1 1 2 1 1 4
Surgery (6) 1 2 1 1 1
Women (5) 1 2 1 1
Total (60) 11 8 7 4 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 4 10
the ICU ward. This finding is in agreement related to the type of infection; for example,
with the finding of another study by Ranjbar in a study performed by Kashfi et al. (2017)
et al. (2011), where most of the isolates were on patients with burn infection, antibiotic
resistance to ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime determine the genotype and investigate the
was reported to be 94 and 75%, respectively genetic features and genetic relatedness
[23]
. In the present study, the highest antibiotic of P. aeruginosa strains isolated from
resistance was observed against gentamicin the studied specimens [7, 33]. The rep-PCR
(95.7%), which is consistent with the results analysis results indicated high genetic
of the studies conducted by Banar et al. diversity among most of the examined
(2016) and Zarei-Yazdeli et al. (2018) [24, strains. In this study, 49 GTG5 types were
25]
. Different gentamicin resistance rates found among 60 P. aeruginosa strains typed
have been reported in different studies; for by rep-PCR, although some of GTG5 types
example, in the studies performed by Song et such as G24, G34, and G40 were common
al. (2001) and Singh et al. (2003), resistance in several isolates. Also, in present study,
to gentamicin was observed in 20 and 31% according to the 80% cut off point, these
of the isolates, respectively, while in the types were grouped into 12 clusters (A-
study conducted by Coetzee and colleagues L) and 10 isolates with unique banding
(2013), gentamicin resistance rate was 92% patterns. This study results also showed
[26-28]
. This difference in gentamicin resistance that the highest genetic diversity and
rates in different studies is probably due distribution of rep types was related
to variation in the type of infection, sample to the ICU; on the other hand, most of
examined, or geographical area. the isolates that showed the lowest and
In this study, 66 (94%) isolates were resistant highest antibiotic resistance (diversity in
to at least three classes of antibiotics, and antibiotic susceptibility) were obtained
they actually exhibited an MDR pattern; from the ICU ward, which is consistent
also, 52 (74%) strains were resistant to all with the rep-PCR results. The greater the
antibiotics, except colistin. In a meta-analysis number and size of clusters in a hospital,
study conducted by Vaez et al. (2018) in the more contamination and circulation of
Iran, the frequency of MDR P. aeruginosa genetically diverse bacteria in the hospital.
[ Downloaded from iem.modares.ac.ir on 2023-11-19 ]
in different parts of Iran was 58%, and the In the current study, clusters A, B, and C had
highest (100%) and lowest (16%) frequency the highest number of strains, indicating
of MDR P. aeruginosa was observed in that the strains related to these clusters are
Tehran and Zahedan, respectively [29]. In a more circulating in the hospital. Similarly,
study performed by Tarafdar and colleagues Ghaleh Sorkh et al. (2017) found that P.
in 2018-2019, similar proportions of MDR aeruginosa strains isolated from this burn
P. aeruginosa were observed in patients center had a significant level of genotypic
admitted to a teaching hospital in Tehran, variability (20 common types of A-T and 20
and 100% of all isolates were MDR [30]. unique types among 75 strains) according
In contrast to the current study results, Khan to rep-PCR analysis [8]. In contrast to the
and colleagues (2014) reported a lower present study results, Faridi and Javadpour
incidence rate of MDR P. aeruginosa isolates (2015) in Bandar Abbas reported only seven
in hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan, where genotypic clusters among 67 P. aeruginosa
30% of isolates were MDR [31]. Additionally, isolates, indicating less genetic diversity
a research performed in the northeast of among the isolates [10]. However, the genetic
Iran found that the prevalence of MDR P. diversity and antibiotic resistance of P.
[ DOI: 10.52547/iem.9.2.99 ]
aeruginosa was 16.5% [32], which is lower aeruginosa strains might help these strains
than the present study finding. survive in the environment.
An essential matter in infection control is to
Figure 1) Dendrogram showing relatedness between rep-PCR patterns of 60 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains
isolated in this study
Microbiol Infect. 2005;11(Suppl 4):17-32. Escherichia coli among Iranian kidney transplant
2. Moradali MF, Ghods S, Rehm BH. Pseudomonas patients. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:1429-37.
aeruginosa lifestyle: A paradigm for adaptation, 14. Rashno Taee S, Khansarinejad B, Abtahi H,
survival, and persistence. Front Cell Infect Najafimosleh M, Ghaznavi-Rad E. Detection of
Microbiol. 2017;7:39. algD, oprL and exoA genes by new specific primers
as an efficient, rapid, and accurate procedure for 24. Banar M, Emaneini M, Satarzadeh M, Abdellahi
direct diagnosis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa N, Beigverdi R, Leeuwen WB, et al. Evaluation
strains in clinical samples. Jundishapur J of mannosidase and trypsin enzymes effects on
Microbiol. 2014;7(10):e13583. biofilm production of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
15. Raman G, Avendano EE, Chan J, Merchant isolated from burn wound infections. PLoS One.
S, Puzniak L. Risk factors for hospitalized 2016;11(10):e0164622.
patients with resistant or multidrug-resistant 25. Zarei-Yazdeli M, Eslami G, Zandi H, Kiani M,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: A Barzegar K, Alipanah H, et al. Prevalence of class
systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob 1, 2, and 3 integrons among multidrug-resistant
Resist Infect Control. 2018;7:1-4. Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Yazd, Iran. Iran J
16. Nikbin VS, Aslani MM, Sharafi Z, Hashemipour Microbiol. 2018;10(5):300-6.
M, Shahcheraghi F, Ebrahimipour GH. Molecular 26. Coetzee E, Rode H, Kahn D. Pseudomonas
identification and detection of virulence genes aeruginosa burn wound infection in a dedicated
among Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from paediatric burns unit. S Afr J Surg. 2013;51(2):50-
different infectious origins. Iran J Microbiol. 3.
2012;4(3):118-23. 27. Singh NP, Goyal R, Manchanda V, Das S, Kaur
17. Khan AA, Cerniglia CE. Detection of Pseudomonas I, Talwar V. Changing trends in bacteriology
aeruginosa from clinical and environmental of burns in the burns unit, Delhi, India. Burns.
samples by amplification of the exotoxin 2003;29(2):129-32.
A gene using PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 28. Song W, Lee KM, Kang HJ, Shin DH, Kim DK.
1994;60(10):3739-45. Microbiologic aspects of predominant bacteria
18. Ranjbar R, Owlia P, Saderi H, Mansouri S, isolated from the burn patients in Korea. Burns.
Jonaidi-Jafari N, Izadi M, et al. Characterization 2001;27(2):136-9.
of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated 29. Vaez H, Salehi-Abargouei A, Ghalehnoo ZR,
from burned patients hospitalized in a major Khademi F. Multidrug resistant Pseudomonas
burn center in Tehran, Iran. Acta Med Iran. aeruginosa in Iran: A systematic review and meta-
2011;49(10):675-9. analysis. J Glob Infect Dis. 2018;10(4):212-7.
19. Khosravi AD, Motahar M, Abbasi Montazeri 30. Tarafdar F, Jafari B, Azimi T. Evaluating the
E. The frequency of class 1 and 2 integrons in antimicrobial resistance patterns and molecular
Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from frequency of bla (oxa-48) and bla (GES-2) genes
burn patients in a burn center of Ahvaz, Iran. in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter
PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183061. baumannii strains isolated from burn wound
[ Downloaded from iem.modares.ac.ir on 2023-11-19 ]
20. Mobaraki S, Aghazadeh M, Barhaghi MH, Memar infection in Tehran, Iran. New Microbes New
MY, Goli HR, Gholizadeh P, et al. Prevalence Infect. 2020;37:100686.
of integrons 1, 2, 3 associated with antibiotic 31. Khan F, Khan A, Kazmi SU. Prevalence and
resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates susceptibility pattern of multi-drug resistant
from northwest of Iran. Biomedicine. 2018;8(1):2. clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in
21. Goli HR, Nahaei MR, Rezaee MA, Hasani A, Kafil Karachi. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30(5):951-4.
HS, Aghazadeh M, et al. Prevalence and molecular 32. Mirzaei B, Bazgir ZN, Goli HR, Iranpour F,
characterization of class 1 integrons among Mohammadi F, Babaei R. Prevalence of multi-drug
clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant
northwest of Iran. Mol Genet Microbiol Virol. (XDR) phenotypes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
2017;32(2):109-15. and Acinetobacter baumannii isolated in clinical
22. Fazeli H, Solgi H, Havaei SA, Shokri D, Norouzi samples from northeast of Iran. BMC Res Notes.
Barogh M, Zamani FZ. Carbapenem and 2020;13(1):1-6.
fluoroquinolone resistance in multidrug resistant 33. Doléans-Jordheim A, Cournoyer B, Bergeron
Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Al-Zahra E, Croizé J, Salord H, André J, et al. Reliability
hospital, Isfahan, Iran. J Med Microbiol Infect Dis. of Pseudomonas aeruginosa semi-automated
2014;2(4):147-52. rep-PCR genotyping in various epidemiological
23. Kashfi M, Hashemi A, Eslami G, Sadredin Amin M, situations. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis.
Tarashi S, Taki E. The prevalence of aminoglycoside- 2009;28(9):1105-11.
modifying enzyme genes among Pseudomonas
[ DOI: 10.52547/iem.9.2.99 ]