Ilovepdf Merged
Ilovepdf Merged
Ilovepdf Merged
Setting Councils
FSRSC AASC
Board of Accountancy 1 Board of Accountancy 1
Securities and Exchange Commission 1 Securities and Exchange Commission 1
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas 1 Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas 1
Commission on Audit 1 Commission on Audit 1
A major organization composed of 1 An association or organization of CPAs in 1
preparers and users of financial statements active public practice of accountancy
Bureau of Internal Revenue 1 Insurance Commission* 1
Insurance Commission* 1 Accredited Nat’l Prof. Org. of CPAs
Accredited Nat’l Prof. Org. of CPAs Public Practice 9
Public Practice 2 Commerce and Industry 1
Commerce and Industry 2 Academe / Education 1
Academe / Education 2 Government 0
Government 2 Total 17
Total 15 *PRBOA Res. No. 29 Series of 2022
Penal Provision
Penal Provision
1. Introduction
2. Assurance engagements
Fundamentals:
• Nature, Demand, Types, Elements
3. Non-assurance engagements
Assurance Engagement - Defined
?
Conclusion that
Evaluation and enhances
Criteria confidence
Measurement
Practitioner
Question
Which of the following is correct regarding assurance engagements?
a. It is an engagement in which a practitioner expresses a conclusion
designed to enhance the degree of confidence of the intended
users other than the responsible party about the outcome of the
evaluation or measurement of a subject matter against criteria.
b. All engagements performed by professional accountants are
assurance engagements.
c. Whether a particular engagement is an assurance engagement
will depend upon whether it exhibits all of the following elements:
Incomplete
a three party relationship, a subject matter, and suitable criteria.
d. CPAs are the exclusive providers of assurance engagements as
the subject matter of assurance engagements is limited only to
financial information of a business entity.
Question
Assurance services least likely involve
a. Improving the quality of information for decision making
purposes.
b. Improving the quality of the decision model used.
c. Improving the relevance of information
d. Implementing a system that improves the processing of
information You will become the responsible party; therefore
no independence
Assurance Engagements: Fundamentals
Demand
Demand for Assurance Engagements
The need for assurance services arises for all of the following
reasons except:
a. Expertise and independence of practitioners
b. Risk management
c. Enhancement in the reliability of information
d. Seeking recommendation
Consulting or Advisory
Question
The need for assurance services arises for all of the following
reasons except:
a. Potential bias in providing information
b. Closeness
Remoteness between user and the organization
c. Complexity of the processing systems
d. Remoteness between a user and the organization
Assurance Engagements: Fundamentals
Types
Types of Assurance Engagements
1. Level of Assurance
a. Reasonable
b. Limited
2. Structure
a. Attestation
b. Direct reporting
Question
Which of the following refers to an attestation type of assurance engagement?
a. The objective is a reduction in assurance engagement risk to an acceptably
RAE for a positive form of expression of the practitioner’s
low level as the basis
conclusion.
b. The objective is a reduction in assurance engagement risk to a level that is
acceptable in the circumstances of the engagement, but where that risk is
greater than for a reasonable
LAE assurance engagement, as the basis for a
negative form of expression of the practitioner’s conclusion.
c. The evaluation or measurement of the subject matter is performed by the
responsible party and the subject matter information is in the form of assertion
by the responsible party that is made available to the intended users.
d. The practitioner either directly performs the evaluation or measurement of the
subject matter, or obtains a representation from the responsible party that has
Direct Reporting
performed the evaluation Assurance Engagement
or measurement that is not available to the intended
users. The subject matter information is provided to the intended users in the
assurance report.
Levels of Assurance and Engagement
Risk
Absolute Not attainable
Reasonable
Assurance
Level
Limited
None Non-assurance
Engagement Risk
Level of Assurance Engagements
• Selective testing
• Judgement
• Inherent limitations of internal control
• Persuasive evidence rather than conclusive
• Characteristics of subject matter
Question
a. b. c. d.
The use of selective testing Yes Yes Yes No
The inherent limitations of Yes Yes Yes Yes
internal control
The use of judgment Yes No Yes No
Most audit evidence are No Yes Yes Yes
persuasive rather than
conclusive
Characteristics of subject matter No No Yes Yes
Structure of Assurance Engagements
Accountability Assurance
1. Financial
2. Non-financial
3. Physical characteristics
4. Systems / Processes
5. Behavior
Criteria
To be suitable:
❑Relevant
❑Complete
❑Reliable
❑Neutral
❑Understandable
Evidence
Basis of opinion/conclusion
Conveys assurance
Which of the following refers to “criteria” element of
assurance engagement?
a. Benchmarks used to evaluate or measure the subject
matter.
b. Information obtained by the practitioner in arriving at
the conclusions on which the opinion is based. Evidence
a. b. c. d.
Nonfinancial performance of Yes Yes Yes No
condition
Behavior Yes Yes Yes Yes
Financial performance or behavior Yes Yes No Yes
Physical characteristics Yes No No No
Systems and processes Yes No Yes Yes
The subject matter of an assurance engagement may take
many forms, including:
a. b. c. d.
Key performance indicators Yes Yes Yes No
Compliance with laws and Yes Yes Yes Yes
regulations
Compliance with contracts Yes Yes No Yes
Internal control Yes No No No
Size of lease property Yes No Yes Yes
Greenhouse gas statement Yes Yes No No
Corporate social responsibility Yes Yes No No
reporting
The characteristics for determining whether criteria are
suitable include:
a. b. c. d.
Relevance Yes Yes Yes Yes
Reliability Yes Yes Yes Yes
Completeness Yes Yes No Yes
Neutrality Yes No No Yes
Comparability Yes No No No
Feedback value Yes Yes No No
Understandability Yes Yes Yes Yes
Non-Assurance Engagements
• Agreed-upon procedures
• Compilation of financial and other information
• Some tax services where no conclusion is expressed, and
tax consulting
• Management consulting and other advisory services
Agree-Upon Procedures
Organization Duty
Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) and Professional It is the primary duty of PRC and BOA to effectively enforce
Regulatory Board of Accountancy (BOA) or implement the provisions of RA 9298.
All duly constituted law enforcement agencies and others of Upon the call or request of PRC or BOA, these organizations
national, provincial, city or municipal government or of any shall render assistance in enforcing the provisions of RA
political subdivision. 9298 and to prosecute any person violating the provisions
of the same.
Secretary of Justice or his duly designated representative He/She shall act as legal adviser to PRC and BOA and shall
render legal assistance as may be necessary in carrying out
the provisions of RA 9298.
Practice of Public Accountancy
Practice in Education/Academe
Practice of Public Accountancy
Appointment Process
1. APO / PICPA (5 nominees)
2. PRC (3 recommendees)
3. President (1 appointee)
Composition & Appointment Process
Names
Individual CPAs – Ernie M. Lat, CPA
Firm (sole) – Do business under registered firm name (Ernie M Lat &
Associates)
Partnership – Do business under registered firm under the Articles of
Partnership (e.g. SGV & Co.)
Accreditation to Practice Public Accountancy
Certificate of Accreditation
Certificate issued under seal, issued by PRC upon recommendation by
BOA attesting that individual CPAs including staff members thereof,
firms, including the sole proprietors and staff members thereof, and
partnerships of CPAs including the partners and staff members thereof,
are “duly accredited” to practice public accountancy in the Philippines.
Requirement
Three (3) year meaningful experience
Meaningful Experience
Commerce & Industry – significant involvement in general accounting,
budgeting, tax administration, internal auditing, liaison with external
auditors, representing his/her employer before government agencies
on tax and matters related to accounting or any other related
functions; or
Academe & Education – shall include teaching for at least three (3)
trimesters or two (2) semesters subjects in either financial accounting,
business law and tax, auditing problems, auditing theory, financial
management and management services. Provided, That the
accumulated teaching experience on these subjects shall not be less
than three (3) school years; or
Meaningful Experience
Government - significant involvement in general accounting,
budgeting, tax administration, internal auditing, liaison with the
Commission on Audit or any other related functions; and
Public Practice - shall include at least one year as audit assistant and at
least two years as auditor in charge of audit engagement covering full
audit functions of significant clients.
Renewal and Expiration
The certificate of accreditation shall be valid for a period of three
years and may be renewed every three years on or before September
30 on the year of expiry upon compliance with requirements.
Renewal and Expiration
**The maximum creditable units for self-directed learning and/or lifelong learning is 48 cu.
***The amount of CPD units (hours) beyond the minimum for each Competence Area.
The Learner professional has the option to take CPD activities under ANY OF the Competence Areas according to his/her
development needs depending on his/her Sector or Area of Professional Practice, Role in the organization, Maturity, and the
like
Organizations
Affecting the
Accountancy
Profession
Accounting and Auditing Standard Setting
Council
FRSC AASC
Board of Accountancy 1 Board of Accountancy 1
Securities and Exchange Commission 1 Securities and Exchange Commission 1
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas 1 Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas 1
Commission on Audit 1 Commission on Audit 1
A major organization composed of preparers and 1 An association or organization of CPAs in active 1
users of financial statements public practice of accountancy
Bureau of Internal Revenue 1
Insurance Commission 1 Accredited Nat’l Prof. Org. of CPAs
Accredited Nat’l Prof. Org. of CPAs Public Practice 9
Public Practice 2 Commerce and Industry 1
Commerce and Industry 2 Academe / Education 1
Academe / Education 2 Government 1
Government 2 17
Total 15
Question
All of the following are represented to the Financial Reporting
Standards Council, except:
a. Commission on Higher Education
b. Board of Accountancy
c. Securities and Exchange Commission
d. Bureau of Internal Revenue
Question
The Financial Reporting Standards Council which is the accounting
standards setting body is composed of a chair and:
a. Fourteen members
b. Fifteen members
c. Sixteen members
d. Seventeen members
Question
The Auditing and Assurance Standards Council which is the accounting
standards setting body is composed of a chair and:
a. Fourteen members
b. Fifteen members
c. Sixteen members
d. Seventeen members
Education Technical Council
• Composed of 7 members with a chairman, who had been or presently
a senior accounting practitioner in the academe/education and six
representatives:
• BOA - 1
• Accredited National Professional Organization of CPAs
Public Practice –1
Commerce and Industry –1
Academe / Education –2
Government –1
Quality Review Committee
• Composed of 7 members with a chairman, who had been or presently
a senior accounting practitioner in the public accountancy
• BOA - 1
• Accredited National Professional Organization of CPAs
Public Practice –2
Commerce and Industry –1
Academe / Education –1
Government –1
Philippine Interpretations Committee
Objectives
• Principally, to issue implementation guidance on Philippine Accounting
Standards (PAS), Philippine Financial Reporting Standards (PFRS) and
related Interpretations (collectively referred to as PFRS) adopted by the
Financial Reporting Standards Council (FRSC) from accounting
pronouncements issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
• To comment on exposure drafts of proposed PFRS and other documents
that may be issued for comment by the FRSC.
• To comment on exposure drafts of proposed accounting standards or
proposed regulations with accounting relevance that may be issued by
government agencies, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission,
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas and Insurance Commission.
Philippine Interpretations Committee
Membership
Accredited Professional Organization
• PICPA as APO. PICPA, a non-stock and not-for-profit organization was
recognized by PRC as the APO on October 2, 1975 per Accreditation
No. 15. It is established for the benefit and welfare of the CPAs.
• Sectoral Organizations
1. ACPAPP
2. ACPACI
3. NACPAE
4. GACPA
Regulatory
Agencies
Professional Regulation Commission
• Agency that administers, implements and enforces the regulatory
policies of the government with respect to the regulation and
licensing of the various professions under its jurisdiction.
Commission on Audit
• The Supreme Audit Institution, its mission is to ensure accountability
for public resources, promote transparency, and help improve
government operations in partnership with stakeholders for the
benefit of the Filipino people.
Securities and Exchange Commission
• Is the regulatory agency charged with supervision over the corporate
sector, the capital market, participants and the securities and
investment instruments market, the protection of the investing
public.
Bureau of Internal Revenue
• Has the primary objective of raising revenue for the government.
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas
• Has the primary objective of maintaining price stability conducive to a
balanced and sustainable economic growth.
Insurance Commission
• Promulgates and implements policies, rules and regulations governing
the operations of entities engaged in insurance and pre-need
companies.
Code of Ethics for
Professional Accountants
Lecture 3
Code of Ethics
It represents a set of moral principles, rules of conduct or values.
Why is there a need for Code of Ethics?
1. A distinguishing mark of the accountancy profession is its acceptance of
the responsibility to act in the public interest which is the collective well-
being of the community of people and institutions the CPA serves.
2. All recognized professions have developed codes of professional ethics.
Purpose of the Code
Overarching Discussion
Requirement
Fundamental principles of These principles establish the standard of behavior expected of a
ethics for professional professional accountant (POPIC)
accountants 1. Integrity
2. Objectivity
3. Professional competence and due care
4. Confidentiality; and
5. Professional behavior
Conceptual framework The professional accountants shall apply the framework in order to
identify, evaluate and address threats to compliance with the
fundamental principles.
International Established for audits, reviews, and other assurance engagements
independence standards regarding threats to independence specific to these engagements.
Structure of the Code
Part 1. Complying with the Code,
Fundamental Principles and Conceptual
Framework
Scenarios Requirement
Code of Ethics vs. Laws Laws and regulations shall prevail.
and Regulations
Conflicting requirements Apply the code of ethics with stricter requirements.
of two countries
Breaches of the Code
Breach Requirements
Of International Refer to discussion of Parts 4A and 4B of the Code
Independence Standards
Of any other provision of The Professional Accountant (PA) who identifies a breach of any other
the Code provision of the code shall (EAR):
1. Evaluate the significance and impact of the breach; and
2. Take whatever Actions might be available immediately to address the
consequences; and
3. Determine whether to Report the breach to relevant parties.
Fundamental Principles
Fundamental Principle Definition and Requirements
Integrity D: To be straightforward and honest in all professional and business
relationships.
R: The PA shall:
• Be alert of the possibility of inadvertent disclosure
• Maintain confidentiality of information within the firm or employing
organization
• Not disclose confidential information acquired
• Not use confidential information acquired
Fundamental Principles
Fundamental Principle Definition and Requirements
Professional Behavior D: To comply with relevant laws and regulations and avoid any conduct
that the professional accountant knows or should know might discredit
the profession
Other requirements:
1. Professional judgement
2. Remain alert for new information
3. Use the reasonable and informed third party test.
Three-Step Approach of the Conceptual
Framework
Step Discussion
Identifying threats The PA shall identify the threats to compliance with fundamental
principles which fall into one or more of the following categories:
• Self Interest Threat
• Self Review Threat
• Advocacy Threat
• Familiarity Threat
• Intimidation Threat
Evaluating Threats The PA shall evaluate whether such threat is at an acceptable level.
Addressing Threats Threats identified that are not an acceptable level must be addressed in
one of the three ways (ESE):
a. Eliminating the circumstances
b. Applying safeguards
c. Declining or ending the professional activity
Consideration for Audits, Reviews and
Other Assurance Engagements
Independence Independence is comprised of:
1. Independence of mind
2. Independence of appearance
Professional skepticism An attitude that includes a questioning mind, being alert to conditions
which may indicate possible misstatement due to error or fraud, and a
critical assessment of audit evidence
Professional Accountants in Business
Circumstances Main Threats Main Fundamental Principle/s
Affected
Conflict of Interest Self-interest Objectivity
Preparation and presentation of Self-interest; intimidation All
information
Acting with sufficient expertise Self-interest Professional competence & due
care
Financial interests, Self-interest Objectivity; Confidentiality
compensation & incentives
Inducements, including gifts Self-interest; familiarity; Integrity; objectivity;
and hospitality intimidation professional behavior
Responding to non-compliance Self-interest; intimidation Integrity; professional behavior
with laws and regulations
Pressure to breach fundamental Intimidation All
principles
Professional Accountants in Public
Practice
Circumstances Main Threats Main Fundamental Principle/s
Affected
Conflict of Interest Self-interest Objectivity
Professional appointments All All
Second opinions Self-interest Professional competence & due
care
Fees and other types of Self-interest Professional competence & due
renumeration care; objectivity
Inducements, including gifts Self-interest; familiarity; Integrity; objectivity;
and hospitality intimidation professional behavior
Custody of clients assets Self-interest Objectivity; professional
behavior
Responding to NOCLAR Self-interest; intimidation Integrity; professional behavior
Part 4. International Independence
Standards
4A. Independence for Audit and Review
Engagements, which Applies when
Performing Audit or Review Engagements
Independence shall be maintained during both:
a. The engagement period; and
b. The period covered by the financial statements.
Network Firms
The rule on independence of the network firms would vary depending on the service
provided
Audit and Review Engagements (4A) Audit and Review Engagements (4B)
A network firm shall be independent When a firm has reason to believe
of the audit clients of the other firms that interests and relationships of a
within the network. network firm create a threat to the
firm’s independence, the firm shall
evaluate and address any such threat.
Long Association Provisions
Client Rules on Rotation
Not a public interest Firm shall determine an appropriate period to address the threats
entity (PIE)
PIE 7 year “time-on period” – Key Audit Partner (KAP) roles are not allowed for
a period > 7 cumulative years
After the 7-year time-on period, the individual shall serve a “cooling-off”
period as follows:
• 5 year cooling off – Engagement Partner
• 3-year cooling off – Engagement Quality Control Reviewer (EQCR)
• 2-year cooling off – Other KAP role
Combination of KAP If the individual acted in combination of KAP roles and served as the
roles engagement partner for 4 or more cumulative years, the cooling off period
shall be 5 consecutive years.
7-Year Time-on Period
The seven (7) year time-on period should be counted in a cumulative (NOT
CONSECUTIVE) manner.
Example:
J Co, CPA served as engagement partner of the audit of SM Inc., a listed
entity, for four (4) consecutive years. After which, J Co took three (3) years
off in the engagement. If J Co, CPA decides to serve a KAP role on the same
engagement, he can only serve it for three more years and would be
required to comply with the 5-year cooling off period.
Exceptions to the 7-year Time-on Period
1. Under IESBA Handbook (up to 1 more year) – (RARE) KAPs whose
continuity is especially important to the audit quality may be permitted
to serve an additional year as KAP
2. Under IESBA Handbook (Up to 2 more years) - If the individual has
served the audit client as KAP for a period of 6 or more cumulative years
when the client becomes PIE, the individual may continue to serve in
that capacity for a maximum of 2 additional years before rotating off the
engagement.
Rotation of External Auditors (under
SRC Rule 68, as amended)
Time-on Period
The independent auditors or the signing partner of the regulated entities
shall be rotated after every five (5) years of engagement.
Cooling-off Period
A 2-year cooling off period shall be observed in the re-engagement of the
same signing partner or individual auditor.
Answer the Drill Exercises
Question 1
Which of the following sentences best describe morality and ethics?
a. Morality and ethics have opposite meanings at the two extremes along the spectrum of
philosophies.
b. Morality applies to human behaviour and the society, while ethics applies to
professional accountants only.
c. Morality is required by the law, while ethics is enforced by professional institutes in
their codes.
d. Morality is generally perceived in a broader sense than ethics and is reflected in human
behaviour and life code.
Question 2
What is the purpose of studying ethics?
a. Become a law enforcement agent.
b. Act as an expert witness in court on the Philippine Financial Reporting Standards.
c. Deal with all dilemmas in the accountancy profession.
d. Decide on ethical issues.
Question 3
Which of the following items is a correct statement in the area of ethical philosophies?
a. Action-based ethics defines good or bad action in terms of its effects on the greatest
number of people.
b. Action-based ethics deals with the right and wrong of the consequences of an action.
c. Result-based ethics defines good or right action in terms of its intrinsic value.
d. Result-based ethics deals with the consequences of a particular action forming the basis
for any valid moral judgement.
Question 4
Miss Li is a CPA and is an employee in a firm of Certified Public Accountants. Miss Li has
been offered a non-executive directorship position (on a part-time basis) by an audit client
of her firm. What should Miss Li do under the Code of Ethics?
a. Miss Li should accept the directorship offer, but she must consult with her manager
and/or partner to ensure appropriate safeguards are in place to reduce the threats to
compliance with the Code of Ethics to an acceptable level.
b. Miss Li should accept the directorship offer and should ask her firm not to engage her
serving that particular audit client.
c. Miss Li should decline the directorship offer because the threats to compliance with the
Code of Ethics would be so significant making it not possible for any safeguard to
reduce them to an acceptable level.
d. Miss Li should decline the directorship offer because her firm would not allow Miss Li
to take up any part-time employment.
Question 5
Taking the case of Miss Li in the previous question, what kinds of threats, potentially
threatening the fundamental principles of the Code of Ethics, are created?
a. Advocacy and familiarity
b. Advocacy and intimidation
c. Self-interest and intimidation
d. Self-interest and self-review
Question 5
Professional Behaviour, as a fundamental principle in the Code of Ethics, requires CPAs:
a. to be straightforward and honest in all professional and business relationships.
b. to comply with relevant laws and regulations and avoid any action that discredits the
profession.
c. to prepare financial statements in accordance with the Philippine Standards on
Auditing.
d. to prepare financial statements in accordance with the Philippine Standards on
Assurance Engagements.
Question 6
Independence of mind refers to a state of mind:
a. separating an individual from the rest of the society.
b. permitting the expression of a conclusion without being affected by influences that
compromise professional judgment.
c. allowing the release of a feeling without compromising professional ethics.
d. integrating an individual with the rest of the society.
Question 7
William is a sole proprietor of PQR-CPA, a firm of Certified Public Accountants, in charge
of the statutory auditor of Big Limited. Which of the following action or behaviour is NOT a
possible threat against the compliance of the fundamental principles of ethics?
a. William becomes a minority shareholder of Big Limited.
b. William lends a moderate sum to a director of Big Limited.
c. William gets married with the finance manager of Big Limited.
d. William gets married with the administrative officer of Big Limited.
Question 8
Which of the following items can help to determine whether an action is ethical?
a. Ethical philosophies
b. Forensic accountancy
c. Profitability
d. Liquidity