Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 18 views

    RF 1 Advisers Guide Quali

    Uploaded by

    6pk4c7kw4k
    This document provides a consultation form for qualitative research proposals. The form guides advisers in evaluating students' research manuscripts. It includes sections to track consultations, provide feedback on technical writing aspects, research components like objectives and methods, and ensure ethical standards. The form aims to improve student manuscripts by highlighting areas that need correction or have missing information.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    RF 1 Advisers Guide Quali

    Uploaded by

    6pk4c7kw4k
    18 views3 pages
    This document provides a consultation form for qualitative research proposals. The form guides advisers in evaluating students' research manuscripts. It includes sections to track consultations, provide feedback on technical writing aspects, research components like objectives and methods, and ensure ethical standards. The form aims to improve student manuscripts by highlighting areas that need correction or have missing information.

    Original Title

    Rf 1 Advisers Guide Quali

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides a consultation form for qualitative research proposals. The form guides advisers in evaluating students' research manuscripts. It includes sections to track consultations, provide feedback on technical writing aspects, research components like objectives and methods, and ensure ethical standards. The form aims to improve student manuscripts by highlighting areas that need correction or have missing information.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    18 views3 pages

    RF 1 Advisers Guide Quali

    Uploaded by

    6pk4c7kw4k
    This document provides a consultation form for qualitative research proposals. The form guides advisers in evaluating students' research manuscripts. It includes sections to track consultations, provide feedback on technical writing aspects, research components like objectives and methods, and ensure ethical standards. The form aims to improve student manuscripts by highlighting areas that need correction or have missing information.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    RF1

    ADVISER’S GUIDE
    QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
    (Consultation Form for PROPOSAL-RES 1 Manuscripts)

    Title of the Study:


    Proponents/Department:

    Instruction: Kindly use this form as a guide in checking the quality of the contents of your
    advisee’s research manuscript. Provide the students with the copy of the filled-out form.
    A. Consultation Tracker
    Consultations Date Remarks
    1st
    2nd
    3rd

    B. Minutes of Corrections/Suggestions

    Reminders

    If you checked NO, please write in the remarks what the student/s should specifically do.

    If there are parts which are not included in the form, please write them in the section where you
    are asked to provide other suggestions or recommendations.

    Parts of the Paper Yes No NA Remarks


    PROPOSAL
    Technicalities/Writing Mechanics
    Left Margin – 1.5”
    Right, Top and Bottom-1”
    Font Style-Arial
    Font Size 12
    Spacing - double space
    3 spaces between parts
    Consistency in font size and style
    Bold headings (capital letters on the first letter only)
    Chapter 1(INTRODUCTION)
    Background of the Study First part of the paper introduces the
    problematic situation related to the
    topic
    Part 2 Describes/defines/discusses the
    topic of interest

    Part 3 mentions related


    researches/studies which have been
    conducted
    Part 4 establishes the gap in research
    (what has not been known?).
    Last part provides reasons why the
    study should be conducted (why it is
    important to study the topic, what
    contribution it can give to the body of
    knowledge)

    Note: To be accomplished in duplicate


    RF1
    Other suggestions/recommendations to
    improve this part of the paper.

    Review of Related Literature presented are related to the


    Literature topic
    Referencing is correct
    Topic Sub-headings are provided
    Theoretical Framework Theory/Theories presented is/are
    related to the study
    Discussion as to why the theory is
    relevant to the study is provided in the
    last paragraph of this section
    Research Objectives The objectives are attainable/doable.

    …is/are clearly written. (variables to be


    investigated are clearly presented)
    Other suggestions/recommendations to
    improve this part of the paper.

    Scope and Limitation of The scope of the following is


    the Study presented:
    a. Variables/research topic
    b. Participants/respondents

    c. Place

    d. time

    The limitation (what the study could not


    cover; what the researcher could not
    do and could not control) is presented.
    Other suggestions/recommendations to
    improve this part of the paper.

    Definition of Terms Terms defined are used in the paper.


    Terms are defined the way they will be
    used in the study.
    Other suggestions/recommendations to
    improve this part of the paper.

    Chapter 2- METHODS
    Research Design
    The design is pointed out (Quali/quanti)
    and is specified as to what particular
    kind.
    The reason of choosing the design is
    presented. (Authorities are cited)
    Research Locale and Location of the study is presented.
    Participants
    The reason why the location is chosen
    is presented
    Respondents/participants are
    described
    Criteria of choosing the

    Note: To be accomplished in duplicate


    RF1
    respondents/participants are given
    Discussion on how to choose the
    participants are provided
    Research Instrument Description of the data gathering tool is
    given
    Data Gathering Procedure The steps on how to gather data are
    clearly presented.
    Data Analysis The data analysis section clearly
    pointed out the steps in the thematic
    analysis.
    Author on thematic analysis is
    mentioned.
    Trustworthiness of the The credibility, confirmability,
    Study transparency and dependability are
    defined, described or discussed with
    citations of authors.
    The paper pointed out how the
    principles of credibility, confirmability,
    transparency and dependability will be
    applied in the study.
    Other suggestions/recommendations to
    improve this part of the paper.

    Ethical Consideration The principles of Informed consent,


    Voluntary participation; Do no harm,
    Confidentiality; and Anonymity are
    presented and discussed with author
    citations.
    The paper pointed out how the
    principles of Informed consent,
    Voluntary participation; Do no harm,
    Confidentiality; and Anonymity
    References All intext-citations are found in the
    reference section
    Citation is in APA format
    Appendices Informed Consent is attached
    Interview Guide Question is attached

    Others:
    ____________________________________________________________________________
    ____________________________________________________________________________
    ___________________________________________________________________________
    _-
    ____________________________________________________________________________
    ____________________________________________________________________________

    __________________________________
    Name and Signature of the Adviser

    Note: To be accomplished in duplicate

    You might also like