The Indian Legal System
The Indian Legal System
The Indian Legal System
net/publication/47704506
CITATIONS READS
4 22,200
1 author:
Belllur Srikrishna
4 PUBLICATIONS 10 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Belllur Srikrishna on 02 April 2015.
March 2009
The International Journal of Legal Information is produced by The International Association of Law
Libraries.
Srikrishna, B. N. (2008) "The Indian Legal System," International Journal of Legal Information: Vol. 36: Iss. 2, Article 8.
Available at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/ijli/vol36/iss2/8
This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for
inclusion in International Journal of Legal Information by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more
information, please contact jmp8@cornell.edu.
The Indian Legal System
B.N. SRIKRISHNA*
The legal system in India follows the common law model prevalent in
the countries which were at one time under British Rule or were part of the
British Commonwealth. The jurisprudence followed in India is almost the
same as the one prevalent in England, though it has been cross-fertilized by
typical Indian values.
*
Mr. Srikrishna is a former justice of the Supreme Court of India. He holds an
LL.B and LL.M from the Government Law College and the University of Mumbai
respectively. In his early career, he specialized in the filed of labor and industrial law
where he gained distinction. He was appointed as a judge of the Bombay High Court
in 1990, and was later appointed as Chief Justice of High Court of Kerala in 2001. He
was elevated to the Supreme Court in 2002, and retired in 2006. Mr. Srikrishna
currently serves as Chairman of the Sixth Pay Commission of the Government of
India.
242
2008] B.N. SRIKRISHNA 243
Each State has its own High Court which is the final court of appeal
in that jurisdiction. The High Court, apart from being the final court of appeal
in civil and criminal matters, also exercises extraordinary constitutional
jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227. Under Article 226, it is empowered
to issue high prerogative writs in cases of breach of fundamental rights and
also in other cases where any State organ acts in an illegal manner or without
jurisdiction and causes injustice to person that is irreparable by the normal
mode of litigation. Since the power is an extraordinary one, it is discretionary
on the part of the High Court to exercise it. Under Art.227 of the Constitution,
the High Court is charged with the duty of ensuring that the Courts and
Tribunals subordinate to it act within their jurisdictional limits. The High
Court is also in charge of the administration of justice in the State. The power
to appoint and/or to dismiss subordinate Judges is to be exercised by the State
in consultation with and as recommended by the High Court while their
promotion postings and other connected matters are exclusively within the
High Court’s domain.
Below the High Court, there is a District Judge in each District who is
in charge of the administration of justice in his District. He would act as the
Court of Appeal in most matters and also as the court of original jurisdiction
in some matters with large pecuniary stakes. The District Judge serves in an
appellate court in respect of civil and criminal appeals arising in the District
and also exercises power of a court of sessions dealing with criminal trials of
serious offences. Below the District Judge, there would be Judges at lower
levels of the rank of Junior or Senior Civil Judges, and Magistrates
administering criminal jurisdiction.