1 3 Precipitation
1 3 Precipitation
1 3 Precipitation
What is Precipitation?
Water falling in solid or liquid form e.g. rain, snow, hail.
1
Mechanism Producing Precipitation
2
Types of Precipitation
Depending upon the way in which the air is lifted and cooled
so as to cause precipitation, we have three types of
precipitation, as given below:
• Cyclonic Precipitation
• Convective Precipitation
• Orographic Precipitation
3
1. Cyclonic Precipitation
Cyclonic precipitation is caused by lifting of an air mass due to the
pressure difference. Cyclonic precipitation may be either frontal or non-
frontal cyclonic precipitation.
Frontal precipitation results from the lifting of warm and moist air
on one side of a frontal surface over colder, denser air on the other side. A
front may be warm front or cold front depending upon whether there is
active or passive accent of warm air mass over cold air mass.
4
Frontal Ppt - Cold Front
In the case of a cold front, a colder, denser air mass lifts the warm, moist air
ahead of it. As the air rises, it cools and its moisture condenses to produce
clouds and precipitation. Due to the steep slope of a cold front, forceful
rising motion is often produced, leading to the development of showers and
occasionally severe thunderstorms.
5
Frontal Ppt. - Warm Front
In the case of a warm front, the warm, less dense air rises up and over the
colder air ahead of the front. Again, the air cools as it rises and its moisture
condenses to produce clouds and precipitation. Warm fronts have a gentler
slope and generally move more slowly than cold fronts, so the rising motion
along warm fronts is much more gradual. Precipitation that develops in advance
of a surface warm front is typically steady and more widespread than
precipitation associated with a cold front. Warm front precipitation is generally
light to moderate
6
Low Pressure
High High
Pressure Pressure
Non-Frontal or Convergence
7
2. Convective Precipitation
Convective precipitation is caused by natural rising of
warmer, lighter air in colder, denser surroundings.
Generally, this kind of precipitation occurs in tropics,
where on a hot day, the ground surface gets heated
unequally, causing the warmer air to lift up as the colder air
comes to take its place. The vertical air currents develop
tremendous velocities. Convective precipitation occurs in
the form of showers of high intensity and short duration
8
radiation
Convection
9
3. Orographic Precipitation
Orographic precipitation is caused by air masses which
strike some natural topographic barriers like mountains, and
cannot move forward and hence rise up, causing
condensation and precipitation. All the precipitation we
have in Himalayan region is because of this nature. It is rich
in moisture because of their long travel over oceans.
10
Orographic
11
Forms of Precipitation
1. Drizzle: A light steady rain in fine drops (0.5 mm) and intensity <1 mm/hr
2. Rain: The condensed water vapor of the atmosphere falling in drops (>0.5
mm, maximum size—6 mm) from the clouds.
3. Glaze: Freezing of drizzle or rain when they come in contact with cold
objects.
4. Snow: Ice crystals resulting from sublimation (i.e., water vapour condenses
to ice)
5. Hail: Small lumps of ice (>5 mm in
diameter) formed by alternate freezing
and melting, when they are carried up
and down in highly turbulent air currents.
12
Forms of Precipitation
1.Dew: Moisture condensed from the atmosphere in small
drops upon cool surfaces.
2.Fog: a thin cloud of varying size formed at the surface
of the earth by condensation of atmospheric vapor
(interfering with visibility)
3.Mist: a very thin fog
13
Definitions of Useful Terms
Depth: depth of rainfall at a point or over an area (mm)
Intensity:
depth of rainfall per unit time i.e. depth/duration (mm/hr)
Time distribution:
Rainfall hyetographs are plots of rainfall depth or intensity as a
function of time. Cumulative rainfall hyetographs are also called
rainfall mass curve.
Isohyets (contours of constant rainfall) can be drawn to develop
isohyetal maps of rainfall depth.
14
Rainfall Intensity, cm/hr
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Time, min
45
40
Annual rainfall, mm
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
Years 15
Annual Precipitation
average precipitation
Measurement of Precipitation
Rainfall varies greatly both in time and space
With respect to time – temporal variation
With space – Spatial variation
18
Measurement of Precipitation
1. Point Data-Gauges
1. Non-recording rain gauges
They are known as non-recording because they do not record the rain but collect the rain.
Precipitation gauge
1 - pole
2 - collector
3 - support- galvanized,
metal sheet
4 – funnel
5 - steel ring
19
20
Measurement of Precipitation
1. Point Data-Gauges
2. Recording rain gauges
- Self recording gauges that measure rain automatically
- The recoding of rain is done through some mechanically operated
system
- It can measure depth as well as rates of rainfall over periods of
time. Three types in common use are:
21
Measurement of Precipitation
Weighing type recording rain gauge:
• In this type of rain-gauge, when a certain weight of rainfall is collected in a
tank, which rests on a spring-lever balance,
• It makes a pen to move on a chart wrapped round a clock driven drum
• The rotation of the drum sets the time scale while the vertical motion of the
pen records the cumulative precipitation.
22
Measurement of Precipitation
Tipping Bucket type recording
rain gauge
27
RAIN-GAUGE DENSITY:
Depends on Storm type:
Cyclonic storms (large areas, low intensities) -small number of gauges is O.K.
Orographic rainfall due to mountains (not fronts) -may need denser network than
flatter area.
In India, on an average, there is 1 rain-gauge station for every 500 km2, while in
more developed countries, it is 1 station. for 100 km2.
28
Average/ Normal Annual Rainfall
• The mean of yearly rainfall observed for a period of 30 consecutive
years is called the average annual rainfall (AAR).
29
Estimation of Missing Precipitation Data
• For larger areas the average of all the stations located in the area
is taken by the following three methods
30
Estimation of Missing Precipitation Data
(i) Arithmetic mean:
• It is obtained by simply averaging arithmetically the amounts of rainfall at the
individual rain-gauge stations in the area
• Use when normal annual precipitation is within 10% of the gauge for which
data are being reconstructed
• This is fast and simple method and results good estimates when
1. Area is flat,
2. Gauges are uniformly distributed and
3. Rainfall is uniform for all gauge stations
1 n
Pm Pi
n i1
where:
Pm = precipitation at the missing location
Pi = precipitation at index station I
n = number of rain gauges 31
(ii) The Normal ratio method:
• Normal ratio method (NRM) is used when the normal annual
precipitation at any of the index station differs from that of the
interpolation station by more than 10%.
• In this method, the records of two or more stations are combined
into one long record provided
– station records are independent and
– the areas in which the stations are located are climatologically the
same.
• The missing record at a station in a particular year may be found by
the ratio of averages or by graphical comparison. For example,
• Rainfall of station A is 75 cm and for the neighboring station B, there
is no record. But if the AAR at A and B are 70 cm and 80 cm,
respectively, the missing year’s rainfall at B (say, PB) can be found
by simple proportion as:
75/70=PB/80
• This result may again be checked with reference to another
neighboring station C.
32
(ii) The Normal ratio method:
• In this method, the precipitation amounts at the index stations are
weighted by the ratios of their normal annual precipitation data in a
relationship of the form:
1 n N m
Pm Pi
n i1 Ni
where:
Pm = precipitation at the missing location
Pi = precipitation at index station I
Nm = average annual rain at ‘missing data’ gauge
Ni = average annual rain at gauge i
n = number of rain gauges
Example 2.1 Rain-gauge station D was inoperative for part of a month during which a storm occurred.
The storm rainfall recorded in the three surrounding stations A, B and C were 8.5, 6.7 and 9.0 cm,
respectively. If the AAR for the stations are 75, 84, 70 and 90 cm, respectively, estimate the storm rainfall
at station D. 33
(iii) Reciprocal Inverse Weighting Factor Approach
P4
Procedure:
• divide area around gauge of interest into
four quadrants; X4 P1
using records at nearest station in each X1
quadrant -
compute missing precipitation amount:
X3 X2
1 4 Pi
Pm 4
i 1 X P2
1 / X i i P3
i 1
where:
Pi = rainfall recorded by gauge i
Xi = distance from gauge i to missing data point
34
Consistency of Precipitation Data
A double-mass curve is used to check the consistency of a
rain gauge record:
compute cumulative rainfall
amounts for suspect gauge and
check gauges
plot cumulative rainfall amounts
against each other (divergence
from a straight line indicates error)
multiplying erroneous data after
change by a correction factor k
where:
36
Solution
Cumulate the annual rainfall amounts for gauge A and for the other four
gauges (B, C, D and E). In the case of the latter - the annual rainfall totals for
gauges B, C, D and E have to be averaged before the cumulative annual
rainfall totals are computed. Once this is done, the mass curve can be plotted:
37
These are then plotted on a double mass curve:
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
Cumulative rainfall (mm) - Gauges 1 - 4
38
(i). If the gauge A record is consistent, the points will fall on one straight line.
Deviation from a straight line indicates an inconsistency. In this case, there
is a distinct change at 1979. The conclusion is that the record for gauge A is
not consistent beyond 1979, and that the annual rainfall amounts for gauge
A from 1979 on require correction.
(ii). To perform the correction, the gradients of the two best fit lines (that is,
1975-79 and 1979-81) and a correction factor, k, (defined as the ratio of the
two) are computed. All the annual rainfall amounts for gauge A from 1979
onwards are corrected by multiplying each by k.
From the uncorrected double mass curves the gradients are found to be:
1975-79 Gradient = (6483-1367) / (5003-1040) = 1.29
1979-81 Gradient = (8719-6483) / (7207-5003) = 1.01
The corrected annual rainfall values for gauge A (shown in bold) and the
corrected cumulative rainfall amounts are shown in the following table:
39
Year Annual depth (mm) Cumulative rain (mm)
Gauge Gauge X Gauge Gauges
X (corrected) X 1,2,3,4
40
Precipitation Analysis
Areal precipitation estimation
Depth-area analysis
Precipitation frequency
Intensity-duration analysis
41
Areal Precipitation Estimation
42
1. Arithmetic Mean Method
The arithmetic mean is the average of the precipitation data collected over
a watershed at different stations located within its boundary. It is
calculated as:
n Pi
P
i 1 n
43
2. Theissen Method P1
A7
A6
P2
A2
A1
A8 A5
P1
P8 P5
A3 A4
P3
P4
2. Theissen Method
• This method is more accurate than simple arithmetic mean
method.
• The gauges should be properly located over the catchment to
get regular shaped polygons.
• Limitation of this method is its non-flexibility
• Since a new Thiessen diagram has to be constructed every time
if there is a change in the rain gauge network
46
3. Isohyetal Method
Potentially most accurate approach, but subjective.
47
Isohyetal Method
• An isohyet is a line joining points of equal rainfall
magnitude. 10.0
8
D
6 C a5
12
9.2
12
a4
7.0 a3
4 B
7.2
A
a2 E 10.0
9.1
4.0 a1
F
8
6
4
Isohyetal Method
P1 P2 P2 P3 Pn1 Pn
a1 a2 ... a n1
P 2 2 2
A
NOTE
The isohyet method is superior to the other two methods
especially when the stations are large in number.
Examples
Example 2.3 Point rainfalls due to a storm at
several rain-gauge stations in a basin are shown
in Fig. 2.10. Determine the mean areal depth of
rainfall over the basin by the three methods.
50
Example 2: The area shown in Figure is composed of a square plus an equilateral triangular
plot of side 10 km. The annual precipitations at the rain-gauge stations located at the four
corners and center of the square plot and apex of the triangular plot are indicated in figure.
Find the mean precipitation over the area by Thiessen polygon method, and compare with the
arithmetic mean.
51