1 KPC TMOSZydwj To ADQQj 1618149367

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Summary of NSA-230 Audit Documentation

Meaning It is record of planning, Procedure Performed,


Evidence Obtained and conclusion taken

Nature of documentation
Documentation provides

Evidence of auditor's Report Evidence that Audit was conducted as


per SA & law

Purposes Planning Accountability Direction significant to future Audit

Review Q.C .Review (internal)

Peer Review (external)

Experienced Auditor An individual who has reasonable understanding of

Audit process NSA (s) & Law Business environment Reporting


issues

Form & Content


Such that it enables users to Understand

NTE of Procedure Evidence Conclusion Doubtful Situation &


response thereof
Document Also

Who Performed

Who Reviewed

Special characteristics

Departure from NSA

When /why/ By whom / Reasons /effect on A.R.


Change

Only Addition [Cannot delete]

Before the end of retention Period

[i.e. .5 yrs from the date of signing of Audit Report, to be assessembled within 60 days of signing ]

Note : Confidential other than as required under law/court or after permission from client.

[Summary of NSA-330] [Responses to Assessed Risk]


 Definition

(1) SP An Audit procedure designed to detect mat mis-stat at assertion level

Test of Detail ARP

(2) C.P An Audit procedure designed to cheek I.C. applied at Assertion level.

Apply procedures to examine fin-stat and their compliance with


 Overall Responses
financial reporting framework
Audit procedure responsive to Assessed Risk at Assertion level

Test of control

Substantive procedure
Test of control Perform if need is there

T or
Timing
He expects that I.C are good

Timing of TOC Particular period If done at interim period then cover remaining
period
or
Throughout the period

I Interim period
Consider changes
P Previous Audit

S Significant Risk Cheek Internal controls over significant risk

Controls are effective or not


E Effectiveness
 Presentation & Disclosure Adequate or not

 Audit Evidence Sufficient & Appropriate

If not obtained

Try to obtain further evidence

If unable

 Documentation Q/D

Overall Responses at the level of financial statement

Responses to Assertion level

Result of Audit procedure

If uses previous experience then how he reached about relying on such document

NSA-450
Evaluation of mis-statement identified during the Audit

 Scope To evaluate the effect of Identified and uncorrected mis -stat, during Audit, on the fin. Stat.
Definitions

(1) Mis-statement A difference between the reported Fin-stat. items and required
for the item to be in accordance with F.R.F.

It may be arise due to Fraud &Error.

(2) Uncorrected mis-statement

Mis-statement that the auditor has accumulated during Audit and that have not been corrected .
 Accumulation of Identified mis-statement

He shall accumulate mis-statement identified during Audit, other than those clearly trivial.

He shall consider whether uncorrected mis-statement is material by considering

Their size & nature

Effect of uncorrected mis-statement of prior period.

If he considers them to be material, may consider Revision of Audit planning including per forming additional procedures.

Communicate them at appropriate level of mgmt. With request to correct them.

If mgmt

Refuses to correct Correct them

ok
Consider their reasons

But perform Additional procedure to determine whether some


Effect on A.R.
other mis-stat remains.

You might also like