LAC Proposal

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Enclosure No. 1: Revised Learning Action Cell Form – June 2021 v.

Republic of the Philippines


Department of Education
REGION I
PANGASINAN SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE II
LUCIANO MILLAN NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
ASINGAN, PANGASINAN

PART I: SCHOOLINFORMATION

Date of Submission
Indicative Dates of
Implementation
Title of LAC
Name of School School ID
District / Municipality
Name of School Head
(LAC Leader) Assistant Principal II
LAC Facilitator
LAC Documenter
LAC Resource Persons/Proponent
LAC Members
LAC Modality
Budgetary Requirement
Funding Source
Name of HRD Coordinator Mobile Number

1|Page
Enclosure No. 1: Revised Learning Action Cell Form – June 2021 v.2

PART II: LAC DETAILS


LAC TITLE:
TERMINAL OBJECTIVE:
ENABLING OBJECTIVES:

NUMBER OF HOURS
TARGET PARTICIPANTS
(Career Stage, Grade/Year level,
Learning Area)
PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT PHILIPPINE PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR TEACHERS
PRIORITIES

NUMBER OF HOURS
MODULES AND LEARNING
RESOURCES TO BE USED (1) Session Guides of Resource Speakers
The following requirements must be (2) Powerpoint Presentations to be used by Resource Speakers
attached in the submission of the LAC
Proposal: (3) Activity Worksheets
1. Session Guides (4) Other references
2. Powerpoint Presentation of Resource
Speakers
3. Activity Worksheets
4. Other References

2|Page
Enclosure No. 1: Revised Learning Action Cell Form – June 2021 v.2

SUCCESS
PHASE ACTIVITIES TIME RESOURCES INDICATORS
PERSONS FUND
(Write the details of all the activities INVOLVED FRAME FUND SOURCE (Specify the success indicators
to be done in every phase) in details in every phase)

Planning

Implementation

Evaluation

PART III. LAC DESIGN

LAC
TITLE: Re-Echo Training on the Revised Format of Learning Action Cell/ In-Service Training
(Write the specific title of the LAC Session)

Duration Topic/s Session Methodology Assessment Outputs Resource Person/s


Objectives Strategies

3|Page
Enclosure No. 1: Revised Learning Action Cell Form – June 2021 v.2

PART IV. MONITORING AND EVALUATION PLAN


(Note: Monitoring and Evaluation Plan following Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model)
Level of M & E Indicators Methods and Tools Data Schedule of Persons Responsible
Sources M&E
Results Improved Performance of IPCRF IPCRF Form At the end of School Year QAME in-charge
participants by at least 2% from the
baseline performance (School Head, PSDS, HRD)

Behavior 90-95% of the total number of Analysis of data generated Self- After 1 year of QAME in-charge
participants applied their learnings from self-assessment form Assessment implementation (School Head, PSDS, HRD)
effectively and efficiently Tool
Learning At least 75% and above mastery Comparative analysis of Pretest & Post Before and after the QAME in-charge
level in all the topics discussed pretest and post test Test conduct of the webinar (School Head, PSDS, HRD)
results before and after
the webinar
Reaction At least 90-95% of the participants Daily analysis of the data QAME Tool Every day after the end of QAME in-charge
responded, “strongly agree” on the gathered from the QAME the day’s session (School Head, PSDS, HRD)
tool

PREPARED BY: CHECKED AND RECORDED: APPROVED BY:

Proponent SHS School HRD Coordinator Principal IV

4|Page

You might also like