Campbell
Campbell
Campbell
Abstract
Objective: The aims were to estimate the prevalence of CNCP in suicide decedents,
and compare sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of people who die by
suicide (i) with and without a history of CNCP and (ii) among decedents with
CNCP who are younger (<65 years) and older (65 + years).
Method: We examined all closed cases of intentional deaths in Australia in 2014,
utilizing the National Coronial Information System.
Results: We identified 2,590 closed cases of intentional deaths in Australia in 2014
in decedents over 18 years of age. CNCP was identified in 14.6% of cases.
Decedents with CNCP were more likely to be older, have more mental health and
physical health problems, and fewer relationship problems, and were more likely to
die by poisoning from drugs, compared with decedents without CNCP.
Comparisons of older and younger decedents with CNCP found that compared to
younger (<65 years) decedents with CNCP, older decedents (65 + years) were less
likely to have mental health problems.
Conclusions: This is the first national study to examine the characteristics of suicide
deaths with a focus on people with CNCP. Primary care physicians should be aware of
the increased risk for suicide in people living with CNCP, and it may be useful for
clinicians to screen for CNCP among those presenting with suicidal behaviors.
above 65 years) with a history of manner of death, in people aged 18 years and
CNCP. over, from the January 1, 2014, until the
December 31, 2014, were examined. The year
2014 was selected as it was the most recent
METHOD year that would have the greatest number of
closed cases to be investigated. Data extrac-
The National Coronial Information tion occurred from August 2017 to February
System (NCIS) is an electronic database of 2018. During this time, the proportion of
information containing case details from coro- closed (and therefore eligible) cases was 88%.
nial files of all Australian states and territories A sample of 2708 suicide cases was identified
from July 1, 2000 (with the exception of from the NCIS database. Cases where the
Queensland where files date from January 1, decedent was under the age of 18 years
2001). The NCIS is managed by the Victorian (n = 81) were excluded. Cases were also
Department of Justice and has been found to excluded if they were still under investigation
have more detailed information recorded than at the time of data extraction (n = 37) result-
other information systems, such as the Aus- ing in a final sample of 2590.
tralian Bureau of Statistics National Deaths
Index data (Bugeja et al., 2016). Outcome Variables
The coronial files consist of documenta-
tion including coroners’ findings, autopsy and Coronial files were examined to deter-
toxicology reports, and police narratives. Cause mine mentions of chronic pain. The presence
of death is ascertained by a forensic pathologist of chronic pain was coded if there were men-
and noted in the autopsy and coroner’s report. tions of chronic pain in any of the coronial
In Australia, the criteria for reporting a death files, such as police narratives, findings, or
vary between jurisdictions. In general, a death autopsy reports. Related terms such as arthri-
is reportable to the coroner where the person tis, fibromyalgia, back or neck pain, and
dies unexpectedly and the cause of death is migraines were included. Coronial files,
unknown; the person died in a violent and including police narratives, and autopsy,
unnatural manner; the person died during, or coronial, and toxicology reports, were manu-
as a result of anesthetic; the person was “held in ally reviewed by research assistants. Weekly
care” or in custody immediately before death; a discussion by the team assisted with coding
medical practitioner has been unable to issue a ambiguous cases. Cases that included men-
death certificate stating the cause of death; or tions of cancer (n = 124) were excluded from
the identity of the decedent is unknown. the CNCP group and included in the non‐
CNCP group, because the focus for this study
Ethics was CNCP.
cases. One in ten decedents had mentions of n = 379) of cases and contributed a mean of
three or more mental health problems. Physi- 27.5 (SD 15.4) YPLL. Less than 3% of cases
cal health problems were identified in over reported three or more physical health prob-
one‐fifth of cases (22.4%), the most common lems (Table 1).
being cardiovascular disease (9.8%). CNCP Among all suicide deaths, the most
was identified in 14.6% (95% CI 13.3–16.0, common risk factors identified were
TABLE 1
Characteristics of People Who Died Via Suicide According to History of Chronic Noncancer Pain,
Australia, 2014
People without a People with a Bivariate comparisons
recorded history recorded history
Total of CNCP of CNCP
n = 2590 n = 2,211 n = 379
% (95% CI) % (95% CI) % (95% CI) OR (95% CI) p value
Mean age (SD) 46.4 (17.49) 44.7 (16.9) 56.6 (17.6) 11.9 (10.02–13.72) <.0001
Male 76.2 (74.5–77.8) 77.0 (75.2–78.7) 71.2(66.5–75.6) 1.35 (1.06–1.72) .015
Married/de facto 36.9 (35.1–38.8) 36.5 (34.5–38.5) 39.8 (35.0–44.9) 1.15 (0.92–1.44) .207
Employed 38.4 (26.5–40.3) 40.1 (38.0–42.1) 28.5 (24.2–33.3) 0.60 (0.47–0.76) <.0001
Rural/remote 35.0 (33.7–37.7) 35.3 (33.4–37.4) 36.4 (31.7–41.4) 1.05 (0.84–1.32) .681
Mental health
Any mental health 65.3 (63.4–67.1) 63.6 (61.6–65.6) 74.9 (70.3–79.1) 1.71 (1.34–2.19) <.0001
illness
Depression 56.0 (54.1–57.9) 54.0 (52.0–56.1) 67.3 (62.4–71.8) 1.75 (1.39–2.20) <.0001
Anxiety 15.2 (13.9–16.6) 14.7 (13.3–16.2) 18.5 (14.9–22.7) 1.31 (1.00–1.75) .057
Schizophrenia/ 8.2 (7.2–9.3) 8.3 (7.2–9.5) 7.7 (5.4–10.8) 0.92 (0.61–1.38) .682
psychosis
Bipolar 4.9 (4.1 5.8) 4.8 (4.0–5.8) 5.0 (3.2–7.7) 1.04 (0.63–1.71) .884
Personality 3.7 (3.0–4.5) 3.7 (3.0–4.6) 3.4 (2.0–5.8) 0.92 (0.51–1.67) .790
disorder
PTSD 2.6 (2.0–3.3) 2.4 (1.8–3.1) 4.0 (2.4–6.5) 1.71 (0.95–3.07) .072
Alcohol use 9.2 (8.1–10.3) 9.0 (7.9–10.3) 10.0 (7.4–13.5) 1.13 (0.78–1.62) .522
problems
Substance use 7.7 (6.7–8.8) 7.6 (6.6–8.8) 7.9 (5.6–11.1) 1.04 (0.69–1.56) .854
problems
3 or more MH 10.0 (8.9–11.3) 9.8 (8.6–11.1) 11.6 (8.7–15.3) 1.21 (0.86–1.71) .271
problems
Physical health
Any physical 22.4 (20.9–24.1) 17.8 (16.3–19.5) 49.3 (44.3–54.4) 4.49 (3.57–5.65) <.0001
health illness
Musculoskeletal 8.7 (7.7–9.9) 2.9 (2.3–3.7) 42.5 (37.6–47.5) 24.4 (17.7–33.6) <.0001
Cardiovascular 9.8 (8.8–11.1) 7.4 (6.4–8.6) 24.3 (20.2–28.9) 4.00 (3.01–5.31) <.0001
disease
Respiratory 4.0 (3.3–4.8) 2.9 (2.3–3.7) 10.0 (7.4–13.5) 3.68 (2.43–5.58) <.0001
disease
Diabetes 3.9 (3.2–4.7) 3.3 (2.6–4.1) 7.6 (5.4–10.8) 2.46 (1.58–3.84) <.0001
Liver disease 2.6 (2.0–3.3) 2.2 (1.7–2.9) 4.7 (3.0–7.4) 2.20 (1.28–3.82) .005
3 or more physical 2.6 (2.1–3.3) 1.6 (1.1–2.2) 8.7 (6.2–12.0) 5.9 (3.6–9.7) <.0001
health problems
TABLE 2
Risk Factors, Suicide Method, and Toxicology among People Who Died Via Suicide According to History
of Chronic Noncancer Pain, Australia, 2014
People without a People with a Comparisons
recorded history recorded history
Total of CNCP of CNCP
n = 2590 n = 2,211 n = 379
Recent risk factors % (95% CI) % (95% CI) % (95% CI) OR (95% CI) p value
Job loss 6.1 (5.2–7.1) 5.9 (5.0–6.9) 7.4 (5.1–10.5) 1.27 (0.84–1.95) .258
Relationship 24.5 (22.9–26.2) 26.0 (24.2–27.8) 16.1 (12.7–20.2) 0.55 (0.41–0.73) <.0001
problems
Loss of children 7.6 (6.6–8.7) 7.9 (6.9–9.2) 5.3 (3.4–8.1) 0.64 (0.40–1.04) .070
Financial difficulties 14.9 (13.6–16.4) 14.6 (13.2–16.1) 16.9 (13.4–21.0) 1.19 (0.89–1.59) .251
Previous attempt 26.0 (24.4–27.7) 25.3 (23.6–27.2) 29.8 (25.4–34.6) 1.25 (0.98–1.59) .069
Left note 58.6 (56.7–60.5) 57.6 (55.5–59.7) 64.6 (59.7–69.3) 1.34 (1.07–1.69) .010
Method
Hanging 55.2 (53.3–57.1) 57.7 (55.6–59.8) 40.6 (35.8–45.7) 0.50 (0.40–0.63) <.0001
Poisoning—drugs 14.6 (13.2–16.0) 11.6 (10.4–13.0) 31.7 (27.2–36.5) 3.52 (2.73–4.53) <.0001
Carbon monoxide 6.3 (5.4–7.3) 6.2 (5.2–7.2) 6.8 (4.7–9.9) 1.12 (0.73–1.74) .599
Firearm 6.0 (5.1–7.0) 5.9 (5.0–6.9) 6.6 (4.5–9.6) 1.13 (0.73–1.76) .587
Jumping 4.2 (3.5–5.0) 4.5 (3.7–5.4) 2.3 (1.2–4.5) 0.52 (0.26–1.04) .063
Sharp object 2.7 (2.2–3.4) 2.7 (2.1–3.5) 2.9 (1.6–5.2) 1.07 (0.56–2.06) .835
Othera 14.4 (13.1–15.8) 14.6 (13.2–16.2) 12.9 (9.9–16.7) 0.86 (0.63–1.19) .377
Toxicology—drugs detected
Alcohol 37.0 (35.1–38.9) 37.1 (35.2–39.2) 35.9 (31.2–40.9) 0.95 (0.75–1.19) .630
Cannabis 10.7 (9.5–11.9) 11.2 (10.0–12.6) 7.4 (5.1–10.5) 0.63 (0.42–0.95) .027
Amphetamines 6.6 (5.7–7.7) 7.3 (6.2–8.4) 2.9 (1.6–5.2) 0.38 (0.20–0.71) .002
Opioids 17.3 (15.9–18.8) 14.1 (12.7–15.6) 35.9 (31.2–40.9) 3.42 (2.69–4.35) <.0001
Nonopioid analgesic 16.1 (14.8–17.6) 13.4 (12.1–14.9) 31.9 (27.4–36.8) 3.02 (2.36–3.87) <.0001
Benzodiazepines 24.9 (23.2–26.6) 22.4 (20.7–24.2) 39.1 (34.2–44.1) 2.22 (1.76–2.79) <.0001
Pentobarbitone 1.9 (1.5–2.5) 1.4 (1.0–1.9) 5.3 (3.4–8.1) 4.05 (2.28–7.21) <.0001
Antidepressant 24.1 (22.5–25.8) 22.5 (20.8–24.3) 33.2 (28.7–38.2) 1.71 (1.35–2.17) <.0001
Antipsychotics 9.3 (8.3–10.5) 8.8 (7.7–10.0) 12.7 (9.7–16.4) 1.51 (1.07–2.11) .017
a
Other includes drowning, vehicles, pesticides, moving object, not specified, fire, and explosives.
(ICD 10 codes X66, X68, X69, X71, X75 X79, X81–X84)
Bold is significant at p < .001
intentional overdose with opioids, benzodi- 2018). Our study, like that of Petrosky et al.,
azepines, antidepressants, and nonopioid (2018), relied on coronial data and therefore
analgesics. police narratives and coronial findings to
CNCP is a prevalent problem, and sui- identify CNCP in suicide. It is likely that our
cidality is common among people living with estimates of CNCP are therefore less than
CNCP (Campbell et al., 2015a). This study true prevalence.
demonstrates that CNCP is also importantly CNCP has a major impact on the indi-
associated with suicide deaths. We identified vidual in terms of quality of life, mental health
that 14.6% of all adult deaths by suicide have and physical health status, relationships, and
a documented history of CNCP. This figure employment (Blyth et al., 2001; Breivik et al.,
is higher than those reported elsewhere: A 2013; Campbell et al., 2015b). We found that,
recent study from the United States identified compared with people who died by suicide
chronic pain in 8.8% of cases (Petrosky et al., without CNCP, people with CNCP were less
8 PREVALENCE AND CHARACTERISTICS
TABLE 3
Characteristics, circumstances, and toxicology comparisons of people less than 65 years and 65 and over
with CNCP
A. People with a B. People with B vs A (ref) Comparisons
recorded history a recorded history
of CNCP younger of CNCP 65 years
than 65 years and older
n = 257 n = 122
% (95% CI) % (95% CI) OR (95% CI) p value
likely to be employed, more likely to have may be understood by the fact that the
mentions of any mental health problems par- deceased with CNCP were more likely to be
ticularly depression, and more likely to have older and therefore more likely to have physi-
other physical health comorbidities. This cal health problems and be retired.
CAMPBELL ET AL. 9
(Carroll et al., 2014). Importantly, the predic- NCIS has been recognized as a unique data
tive value of suicidal ideation for subsequent source that provides reliable and high‐quality
suicide is significantly lower in nonpsychiatric detailed information (Bugeja et al., 2016), sev-
cohorts such as primary health care or general eral limitations should be acknowledged. The
population samples than among people who current study was based on coronial files and
receive psychiatric care (McHugh et al., not on clinical diagnoses. Reliance on inves-
2019). Increasing access to other treatment tigative reports means that the results pre-
options, especially pain management pro- sented here are likely to underrepresent the
grams, would be preferable to simply restrict- true numbers of people experiencing CNCP.
ing access to necessary medications in people We are limited to details that are provided by
with suicidal ideation. Indeed, it has been sug- police, family, and friends. We do not know
gested that the restriction of medication, with any specific pain factors such as pain duration,
no alternative effective pain management, cause of pain, pain severity, and impact of
might actually lead to increased suicide rates pain on everyday life. Additionally, it is diffi-
in people living with CNCP (Ilgen, 2018). cult to ascertain from coronial files the exact
With an aging population and risk factors that were directly related to an
increases in CNCP, where there is no simple individual’s suicide. Cases were also restricted
effective treatment, it is important to increase to those coded as having deliberate intention.
access to specialist supportive services such as Cases of undetermined intent were thus not
multidisciplinary pain treatment programs included.
that may assist patients in managing their
CNCP. Pain management programs com-
prising a multidisciplinary team of health pro- CONCLUSION
fessionals, including psychologists,
physiotherapists, and pain specialists, are the The current study was the first national
best approach for managing CNCP (Kamper study to examine CNCP among suicide
et al., 2015). One of the challenges in provid- deaths in Australia. Acknowledgment and
ing effective treatment is accessibility to these understanding of CNCP as a risk factor for
multidisciplinary pain management programs suicide are crucial. Primary care physicians
which, unlike opioid medication, are largely should be aware of the increased risk for sui-
not subsidized by the health system. Access cide in people living with CNCP, and clini-
and affordability of these programs are essen- cians should screen for CNCP among those
tial in order to address the multitude of prob- presenting with suicidal behaviors. Although
lems experienced by this population. In restriction of access to means is an effective
addition, suicide rates are 1.7 higher in rural/ suicide prevention strategy, it is important
remote areas (AIHW, 2019). We found that that patients with suicidal ideation receive
just under 40% of younger people who die by targeted and tailored support, rather than
suicide with CNCP lived in rural or remote simply having access to their medicines
areas. Access to multidisciplinary pain ser- restricted. In order to address CNCP and sui-
vices for people in rural and remote areas in cide, it is important that both affordability
Australia remains limited and is a crucial tar- and access to pain management programs
get for services improvement (Hogg et al., become a priority.
2012). This study was funded by the Society
for Mental Health Research Early Career
Limitations Research Fellow grant. GC is supported by
National Health and Medical Research
One of the major strengths of the cur- Council fellowships (#1119992). The
rent study was that it included all closed sui- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre
cide cases in people over the age of 18 years at University of New South Wales, Australia,
in Australia in 2014. Although the use of is supported by funding from the Australian
CAMPBELL ET AL. 11
Government, under the Substance Misuse Benckiser/Indivior for a study of opioid sub-
Prevention and Service Improvements Grant stitution therapy uptake among chronic non-
Fund. GC has received an investigator‐initi- cancer pain patients. This is not related to the
ated untied educational grants from Reckitt current study.
REFERENCES
AIHW (2019). Rural & remote health. (2015b). The Pain and Opioids IN Treatment
Retrieved September 5, 2018, from https://www.ai study: Characteristics of a cohort using opioids to
hw.gov.au/reports/rural‐health/rural‐remote‐health/ manage chronic non‐cancer pain. Pain, 156, 231–
contents/deaths‐remoteness. 242.
ANDREAS, S., SCHULZ, H., VOLKERT, J., CARROLL, R., METCALFE, C., & GUNNELL,
DEHOUST, M., SEHNER, S., SULING, A., ET AL. D. J. P. O. (2014). Hospital presenting self‐harm
(2017). Prevalence of mental disorders in elderly and risk of fatal and non‐fatal repetition: systematic
people: The European MentDis_ICF65+ study. review and meta‐analysis. PLoS ONE, 9, e89944.
British Journal of Psychiatry, 210, 125–131. CDC (2018). CDC vital signs. Retrieved
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2018). Cause November 14, 2018, from https://www.cdc.gov/
of death: Australia, 2017. Retrieved November 5, vitalsigns/pdf/vs‐0618‐suicide‐H.pdf.
2018, from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@. CIMAS, M., AYALA, A., SANZ, B., AGULLÓ‐
nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/3303.0~2017~Main% TOMÁS, M. S., ESCOBAR, A., & FORJAZ, M. J. (2018).
20Features~Intentional%20self‐harm,%20key% Chronic musculoskeletal pain in European older
20characteristics~3. adults: Cross‐national and gender differences.
BLYTH, F. M., MARCH, L. M., BRNABIC, A. J.M., European Journal of Pain, 22, 333–345.
JORM, L. R., WILLIAMSON, M., & COUSINS, M. J. CLAPPERTON, A., BUGEJA, L., NEWSTEAD, S.,
(2001). Chronic pain in Australia: A prevalence & PIRKIS, J. (2018). Identifying typologies of persons
study. Pain, 89, 127–134. who died by suicide: Characterizing suicide in
BREIVIK, H., EISENBERG, E., & O’BRIEN, T. Victoria, Australia. Archives of Suicide Research, 1–16.
(2013). The individual and societal burden of COCHRAN, B. N., FLENTJE, A., HECK, N.
chronic pain in Europe: The case for strategic pri- C., VAN DEN BOS, J., PERLMAN, D., TORRES, J.,
oritisation and action to improve knowledge and ET AL. (2014). Factors predicting development
availability of appropriate care. BMC Public Health, of opioid use disorders among individuals who
13, 1229. receive an initial opioid prescription: Mathemat-
BUGEJA, L., IBRAHIM, J. E., FERRAH, N., ical modeling using a database of commercially‐
MURPHY, B., WILLOUGHBY, M., & RANSON, D. insured individuals. Drug and Alcohol Dependence,
(2016). The utility of medico‐legal databases for 138, 202–208.
public health research: a systematic review of peer‐ DAHLHAMER, J., LUCAS, J., ZELAYA, C.,
reviewed publications using the National Coronial NAHIN, R., MACKEY, S., DEBAR, L., ET AL. (2018).
Information System. Health Research Policy and Sys- Prevalence of chronic pain and high‐impact
tems, 14, 28. chronic pain among adults ‐ United States, 2016.
CALATI, R., BAKHIYI, C. L., ARTERO, S., MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 67,
ILGEN, M., & COURTET, P. (2015). The impact of 1001–1006.
physical pain on suicidal thoughts and behaviors: DARKE, S., LAPPIN, J., & FARRELL, M.
Meta‐analyses. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 71, (2019). The clinician’s guide to illicit drugs and health.
16–32. London: Silverback Publishing.
CAMPBELL, G., BRUNO, R., DARKE, S., HAWTON, K., BERGEN, H., SIMKIN, S.,
SHAND, F., HALL, W., FARRELL, M., ET AL. (2016). DODD, S., POCOCK, P., BERNAL, W., ET AL. (2013).
Prevalence and correlates of suicidal thoughts and Long term effect of reduced pack sizes of paraceta-
suicide attempts in people prescribed pharmaceuti- mol on poisoning deaths and liver transplant activ-
cal opioids for chronic pain. The Clinical Journal of ity in England and Wales: Interrupted time series
Pain, 32, 292–301. analyses. BMJ, 346, f403.
CAMPBELL, G., DARKE, S., BRUNO, R., & HOGG, M. N., GIBSON, S., HELOU, A.,
DEGEHARDT, L. (2015a). The prevalence and corre- DEGABRIELE, J., & FARRELL, M. J. (2012). Waiting
lates of chronic pain and suicidality in a nationally in pain: A systematic investigation into the provi-
representative sample. Australian & New Zealand sion of persistent pain services in Australia. Medical
Journal of Psychiatry, 49, 803–811. Journal of Australia, 196, 386–390.
CAMPBELL, G., NIELSEN, S., BRUNO, R., ILGEN, M. (2018). Pain, opioids, and suicide
LINTZERIS, N., COHEN, M., HALL, W., ET AL. mortality in the united statespain, opioids, and
12 PREVALENCE AND CHARACTERISTICS
suicide mortality in the United States. Annals of MERSKEY, H., & BOGDUK, N. (1994). Task
Internal Medicine, 169, 498–499. Force on Taxonomy of the International Associa-
ILGEN, M. A., BOHNERT, A. S., GANOCZY, tion for the Study of Pain. In Pain IAftSo (Ed.),
D., BAIR, M. J., MCCARTHY, J. F., & BLOW, F. C. Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain
(2016). Opioid dose and risk of suicide. Pain, 157, syndromes and definition of pain terms. Seattle: IASP.
1079–1084. NAGHAVI, M. (2019). Global, regional, and
ILGEN, M., KLEINBERG, F., IGNACIO, R., national burden of suicide mortality 1990 to 2016:
BOHNERT, A. S., VALENSTEIN, M., MCCARTHY, J. systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Dis-
F., ET AL. (2013). Noncancer pain conditions and ease Study 2016. BMJ, 364, l94.
risk of suicide. JAMA Psychiatry, 70, 692–697. OBERHAUS, D. (2018). Rise of the DIY death
JACKSON, T., THOMAS, S., STABILE, V., machines. Vice.
SHOTWELL, M., HAN, X., & MCQUEEN, K. (2016). O’CONNOR, E., GAYNES, B., BURDA, B. U.,
A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the global SOH, C., & WHITLOCK, E. P. (2013). U.S. Preven-
burden of chronic pain without clear etiology in tive Services Task Force Evidence Syntheses, formerly
low‐ and middle‐income countries: trends in Systematic Evidence Reviews. Screening for Suicide
heterogeneous data and a proposal for new assess- Risk in Primary Care: A systematic evidence review for
ment methods. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 123, 739– the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville,
748. MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
JOHANNES, C. B., LE, T. K., ZHOU, X., JOHN- (US).
STON, J. A., & DWORKIN, R. H. (2010). The preva- O’CONNOR, R. C., & KIRTLEY, O. J. (2018).
lence of chronic pain in United States adults: The integrated motivational‐volitional model of
Results of an Internet‐based survey. The Journal of suicidal behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the
Pain, 11, 1230–1239. Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373, 20170268.
JOINER, T. (2007). Why people die by suicide. PETROSKY, E., HARPAZ, R., FOWLER, K. A.,
Cambridge: Harvard University Press. BOHM, M. K., HELMICK, C. G., YUAN, K., ET AL.
KAMPER, S. J., APELDOORN, A. T., CHIAR- (2018). Chronic pain among suicide decedents,
OTTO, A., SMEETS, R. J., OSTELO, R. W., GUZMAN, 2003 to 2014: findings from the national violent
J., ET AL. (2015). Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial death reporting system. Annals of Internal Medicine,
rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: Cochrane 169, 448.
systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMJ, 350, SOLBECK, P., SNOWDON, V., RAJAGOPALAN,
h444. A., & JHIRAD, R. (2019). Suicide by fatal pentobar-
LADER, M. (2011). Benzodiazepines revis- bital intoxication in Ontario, Canada, from 2012
ited–will we ever learn? Addiction, 106, 2086–2109. to 2015. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 64, 309–313.
MANN, J., APTER, A., BERTOLOTE, J., BEAU- TANG, N. K., & CRANE, C. (2006). Suicidal-
TRAIS, A., CURRIER, D., HAAS, A., ET AL. (2005). Sui- ity in chronic pain: a review of the prevalence, risk
cide prevention strategies: A systematic review. factors and psychological links. Psychological Medi-
JAMA, 294, 2064–2074. cine, 36, 575–586.
MCHUGH, C. M., CORDEROY, A., RYAN, C.
J., HICKIE, I. B., & LARGE, M. M. (2019). Associa- Manuscript Received: July 2, 2019
tion between suicidal ideation and suicide: Meta‐ Revision Accepted: December 9, 2019
analyses of odds ratios, sensitivity, specificity and
positive predictive value. BJPsych Open, 5, e18.
CAMPBELL ET AL. 13
APPENDIX 1
Comparison of younger people (<65 years) with and without history of chronic non-
cancer, Australia, 2014
Bivariate comparisons
Younger people
(< 65 years old) Younger people
without a with a recorded
recorded history of
history of CNCP CNCP
n = 1,928 n = 257
% (95% CI) % (95% CI) OR (95% CI) p value
Mean age (SD) 40.2 (12.5) 46.6 (10.7) 6.48 (4.87–8.08) <.0001
Male 76.7 (74.8–78.5) 72.8 (67.0–77.9) 1.23 (0.92–1.65) .163
Married/de facto 34.8 (32.7–36.9). 38.5 (32.7–44.6) 1.18 (0.89–1.53) .235
Employed 44.6 (42.4–46.8) 39.7 (33.7–45.8) 0.82 (0.63–1.07) .136
Rural/remote 34.7 (32.6–36.8) 38.4 (32.6–44.6) 1.18 (0.90–1.54) .236
Mental health
Any mental health 65.4 (63.2–67.4) 83.3 (78.2–87.4) 2.64 (1.88–3.71) <.001
illness
Depression 55.3 (53.1–57.5) 73.5 (67.8–78.6) 2.25 (1.68–3.00) <.0001
Anxiety 15.4 (13.9–17.1) 21.8 (17.1–27.3) 1.53 (1.11–2.11) .009
3 or more MH 10.6 (9.3–12.0) 15.6 (11.6–20.6) 1.56 (1.08–2.25) .018
problems
Physical health
Any physical health 12.9 (11.5–14.5) 38.9 (33.1–45.0) 4.29 (3.23–5.70) <.0001
illness
3 or more physical 0.5 (0.3–0.9) 5.1 (3.0–8.5) 10.2 (4.43–25.55) <.0001
health problems
Method of suicide
Hanging 61.0 (58.8–63.2) 44.0 (38.0–50.1) 0.50 (0.39–0.65) <.0001
Poisoning—drugs 11.0 (9.6–12.5) 30.7 (25.4–36.7) 3.59 (2.66–4.85) <.0001
Toxicology—drugs detected
Alcohol 39.5 (37.4 (41.7) 40.9 (35.0–47.0) 1.06 (0.81–1.38) .682
Opioids 13.5 (12.1–15.1) 37.4 (31.6–43.5) 3.81 (2.87–5.06) <.0001
Nonopioid analgesic 12.0 (10.7–13.6) 27.6 (22.5–33.4) 2.79 (2.06–3.79) <.0001
Benzodiazepines 21.3 (19.5–23.2) 37.4 (31.6–43.5) 2.21 (1.68–2.91) <.0001
Antidepressant 22.0 (20.2–23.9) 35.8 (30.1–41.9) 1.98 (1.50–2.61) <.0001
Antipsychotics 9.0 (7.8–10.3) 15.6 (11.6–20.6) 1.87 (1.29–2.71) .001
APPENDIX 2
Comparison of older people (65 years and over) with and without history of chronic non-
cancer, Australia, 2014
Bivariate comparisons
Older people
Older people (65+) with a
(65 + years old) recorded
without a recorded history of
history of CNCP CNCP
n = 283 n = 122
% (95% CI) % (95% CI) OR (95% CI) p value
Mean age (SD) 75.6 (8.0) 77.5 (8.5) 1.88 (0.15–3.62) .034
Male 79.2 (74.0–83.5) 68.0 (59.2–75.8) 1.78 (1.11–2.87) .017
Married/de facto 48.1 (42.3–53.9) 42.6 (34.1–51.6) 0.80 (0.52–1.23) .315
Employed 9.2 (6.3–13.2) 4.9 (2.2–10.6) 0.51 (0.20–1.28) .150
Rural/remote 39.9 (34.4–45.8) 32.2 (24.4–41.1) 0.72 (0.46–1.21) .144
Mental health
Any mental health 51.6 (45.7–57.4) 57.4 (48.4–65.9) 1.26 (0.82–1.94) .285
illness
Depression 45.6 (39.8–51.4) 54.1 (45.1–62.8) 1.41 (0.92–2.15) .116
Anxiety 9.5 (6.6–13.6) 11.5 (6.9–18.5) 1.23 (0.62–2.43) .554
3 or more MH 4.2 (2.4–7.3) 3.3 (1.2–8.5) 0.77 (0.24–2.42) .649
problems
Physical health
Any physical health 51.2 (45.4–57.0) 71.3 (62.6–78.7) 2.36 (1.50–3.73) <.0001
illness
3 or more physical 8.8 (6.0–12.8) 16.4 (10.8–24.1) 2.02 (1.08–3.80) .029
health problems
Method
Hanging 35.3 (30.0–41.1) 33.6 (25.7–42.5) 0.93 (0.59–1.45) .738
Poisoning—drugs 15.9 (12.1–20.7) 32.8 (25.0–41.7) 2.58 (1.57–4.23) <.0001
Toxicology—drugs detected
Alcohol 21.2 (16.8–26.4) 25.4 (18.4–34.0) 1.27 (0.77–2.08) .352
Opioids 17.7 (13.6–22.6) 32.8 (25.0–41.7) 2.273 (1.40–3.70) .001
Nonopioid analgesic 23.0 (18.4–28.3) 41.0 (32.5–50.0) 2.33 (1.45–3.67) <.0001
Benzodiazepines 30.4 (25.3–36.0) 42.6 (34.1–51.6) 1.70 (1.10–2.64) .018
Antidepressant 26.1 (21.3–31.6) 27.9 (20.6–36.6) 1.09 (0.68–1.76) .719
Antipsychotics 7.4 (4.9–11.1) 6.6 (3.3–12.6) 0.88 (0.38–2.04) .757