Team 12 Milestone 1
Team 12 Milestone 1
Team 12 Milestone 1
State (or
Name ASU Email Address country, if Phone (optional)
outside U.S.)
Kevin Miranda kjmiran1@asu.edu WA (323) 271-8540
Joshua Moody jdmoody2@asu.edu TX (520) 425-6294
Triston Miller Tcmill10@asu.edu NC (980) 431-8458
Alexis Moore amoore88@asu.edu AZ (916) 298-9319
This team has been formed to complete the Culminating Team Project Milestone for PMG 422
Class 28853. Our overall goal is to master the course material to the best of our abilities and
demonstrate those skills through this Culminating Team Project Milestone. We are committed to
working as a team by monitoring our progress, effectiveness, and follow through on
commitments made to this team and this class.
Skills, characteristics, and/or knowledge individual members can contribute (list by team
member):
Here we will determine a common set of performance goals through the analysis of the skill sets
of all team members in relation to the work we have to complete. We identify our background
experience and complimentary skills.
Strengths:
Kevin Miranda: I have good communication skills, I like to finish things early for review, I am
fairly good with computers, and I can easily learn how to produce visual products. I have
experience with managing large groups of people. I am a problem solver.
Joshua Moody: I am very detail oriented with a keen eye for reviewing documents for accuracy.
I communicate well and I have experience proving adaptable and efficient as it relates to
working with different personalities, character traits, and work ethics within a group setting.
Triston Miller: I am good with time management and ensuring I have enough time to complete
my assignments prior to any deadlines so that I can review the work to look for any errors or
areas that need improvement. I have a lot of experience working in groups as I do this often at
my job and have worked on several group projects here at ASU.
Alexis Moore: I’m a very people-oriented person, and I work best when someone applies
pressure to me, but I can apply pressure to myself just fine. My talents involve editing,
reviewing, and proofreading, and ensuring that written works flow well. I’ve worked in group
projects before for my schooling, but I have no professional experience.
Development Needs:
❚ Functional Roles
Project Lead - They will oversee the entire project and determine goals with input from the rest of the
team. They will proactively research the requirements of each project, develop goals and tasks for each
project to present them in the meetings. They will initiate feedback from each team member and facilitate
collaborations and accountability.
Editor - They will compile inputs from each team member to produce artifacts for submission for each
milestone. They will collaborate primarily with the Project Manager and with the team members on
information, format, and delivery.
Team Member - Each team member will provide input on what tasks, goals and requirements they feel
confident in executing. They will complete tasks and deliverables assigned to them by the agreed
deadlines. They will provide clear communication to the rest of the team on their progress. Each team
member will provide feedback on the final version of each artifact.
Milestone 1:
Individual Contributions:
Milestone 2:
Individual Contributions:
Milestone 3:
Individual Contributions:
Team Meetings:
Ground Rules:
● Discord is our primary communication and where each meeting will take place.
● Only voice is required at the meeting. Video is optional.
● If a team member misses the meeting, they must check in with the Discord server each
week by Tuesday night to see their assigned work.
● A check in just means acknowledging to the team in a message on the server that you
have synced with the information provided.
● The Project Leader will contact those who have not checked in after Tuesday to get some
acknowledgement. If the absent team member does not respond by Thursday, 6 pm
Arizona time, of that same week, the team will discuss whether they divide the work,
assigned to the absentee member, amongst themselves and contact the professor about the
student. If the team decides the absentee member has not contributed without a good
reason, the Team Leader will contact the instructor for mitigation.
● ALL ASSIGNED WORK IS DUE THE THURSDAY NIGHT 11:59 PM ARIZONA
TIME BEFORE THE DEADLINE.
● The Editor has all day FRIDAY to compile the work into a final version with the help of
the Project Lead.
● The team has until 12pm on the Saturday before the deadline to approve/disapprove the
final version for submission. Reasoning: To have time the rest of Saturday and Sunday
for the team to rework any portions of the assignment.
The team will vote on approval of final submission by the deadline set in the Ground Rules
portion of the Team Charter. An approval vote of 4 out of 5 members by the set deadline will be
the agreed upon requirement to move forward with the submission of the team’s work. Feedback
is encouraged and members must generate alternative solutions before the deadline for approval.
Team Communication:
Discord will be the primary form of communication. If a member does not respond on Discord,
any team member is allowed to email that member to their provided email. Each team member
has the option to provide their personal cell phone number, but it is not a requirement. The phone
number is only to be used by the Team Leader to contact the absentee team member as a final
attempt in communication before the team progresses to involve the instructor.
Attendance at meetings:
Attendance is expected at every meeting. If a member is absent, they must communicate their
absence in a timely manner and follow up with the team as soon as possible.
Participation:
Full participation is expected of all team members. If someone feels that others are not
contributing enough, the concerned member will bring it up with the Team Leader or in the
meetings if they choose.
Project quality management is a process that entails the assurance of a project meeting
both organizational and stakeholder standards (Rose, 2014, pg. 49). To ensure a project meets
project quality standards, it must capitalize on the three constraints of time, cost, and scope. This
means that a quality deliverable is on time or early, meets or is under budget, and meets the
requirements within the scope of work. Each organization has different standards for quality,
therefor additional requirements may be present depending on the circumstances. The
significance of project quality management is that the effects of quality management do not end
with the conclusion of a project. If the project closes with a high-quality deliverable, and the
relationship between stakeholders and project managers has been well managed, then both the
project manager and organization gain good credibility as a trustworthy entity that can deliver
quality products. This extends past the area of credibility, and into other areas such as making
good faith contracts, and the consideration of how ethical a project may be. If an organization is
known for delivering quality products, it adds a layer of trust to a contract, that the managers
behind the project will do their best to always ensure a quality product. The same applies to
ethics and morals as well, a project that is high quality should also be applying to moral
standards as well. When a quality product is morally correct in its production, then there is the
added benefit of good ethics.
Rose, K.H. (2014) Project Quality Management, Second Edition: Why, What and How (3rd Ed.)
Fl: J Ross Publishing. ISBN: 13: 9781604271935