Encyclopaedia of Indian Temple Architecture, II (Pt. 1) - Text
Encyclopaedia of Indian Temple Architecture, II (Pt. 1) - Text
Encyclopaedia of Indian Temple Architecture, II (Pt. 1) - Text
‘Indian
me leit
Te mple :Architecture oe
NORTH INDIA aes
FOUNDATIONS OF NORTH INDIAN STYLE |
ELE.
oN , a,
CY
a
BN
Li
Y
;
Vol. II, Pt. 1
ollowing parts of
158 text figures giving
and sections, many temple plans, ele
previously not Publis vations, |
black-and-white Plates hed; 77g | |
; 15 Maps; a quick
Glossary of technical Reference |
vocabulary; and a Sit
e Index are}
ISBN 0 19 562313 4
|
Cover drawing:
Rajim. Rajivaloca
na temp
Pi
l e, Mahaké
¢. A.D, 600. (C ak6sala st ]
ourtesy: Michae
l Ww. Meister)
. ii
Back cover photo:
| hgaya.aMahabodhj
he abddhi temple, Ma
gadha Style,
"
,
ip
Wha a
di iayt Ya
ha)
#)
WN
Contents
TEXT VOLUME
Vv
Preface
Style Outline vi
Conventions vii
Acknowledgments viii
xiii
List of Maps
XV
Figure References
CONTRIBUTOR PAGE
CHAPTER
Krishna Deva 3
1. anas, K satrapas
Mauryas Sungas, Kanvas, KusMau rya an d post-Maurya remains (11);
Bodhigharas, Other shrines (7); (16)
(15); Ksatrapa s hrines, Dévnimori
Kusana shrines (13); Kumrahar
Krishna Deva 19
2. Guptas and Their Feudatories ,
Baigram (24); Sarnath, Mahasthan
Pawayd, Lauria Nandangadh, i (28);
chatrd, Sancti (26); Udayagir
Mirpurkhds (25); Gokul, Ahic (33) ; Tiga wa,
Tumain (32); Eran
Darra (30); Bilsad, Gadhwa, mara (40);
Bhi tar gan v (36); Nacna (39); Eran, Bhi
Kunda, Bhitari (35);
; Devgadh (48); Sakor (52);
Pipariyd, Nacnd (44); Devri (47)
Sarnath, Carcéma (54); Marti (56)
AP. Jamkhedkar 59
3. Vakatakas (Main Branch)
(65)
Mandhal (63); Nagra (64); Ramték
Krishna Deva 73
4. Vakatakas of Vatsagulma
Ajanta, Ghatétkaca (75)
M.A. Dhaky 79
5. Traikatakas of Aniruddhapura
Kanhéri (81); Londd (82)
M.A. Dhaky 85
6. Mauryas of Puri
Elephanta (89)
Jégésvari (88); Mandapésvara,
Rastrakitas of
7. Kalacuris of Mahismati and Early M.A. Dhaky 93
Elapura
Ellérd (97)
Krishna Deva 101
ies
8. Later Guptas and Minor Dynast a (108); Aphsad (112)
Rajeir (103); Bod hga ya (104 ); Nal and
Contents
CHAPTER
CONTRIBUTOR PAGE
395
Reference Glossary
417
Site and Temple Index
PLATES VOLUME
vii
Style Code for Plate Reference
3
Plate/Chapter Reference
5
Plates: 1-778
|
List of Maps
PAGE
MAP
1. Pan-Indian sites
FIG, SITE AND SUBJECT PAGE FIG. SITE AND SUBJECT PAGE
at
FDOo>Y
Wg
K
Cx
2
\
KADM
4
ss
Av
:
>
:\
Ww VjKE
a=
C<ES
Lae
7
——s
‘=
as
ss
=»
$72
X<
—_
e
Vi~<
:
a
LVS
CDi
;
23
Y
&
Ss
=
z
3F-
>
Frontispiece
, Rajim, Ra Ji
j valécana te
(Cou
Ourt
rtesy and m ple, c. a ‘D. 60
Copyright: Mich 0. Axono metric
ael} W. drTa
awwi
i ng,
eiste
Meis terr..)) (See p,
230.)
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
Takgasila
©© 2
RAWALPINDI
Murtie
™.,
j
7 g KETAS”
Sea *
<,
3
iS
®
e|.Pitat Ajanta
Kora,
BHUVANESVARA
Pan-Indian sites
MAURYAS, SUNGAS, KANVAS, KUSANAS, KSATRAPAS
Arthasastra
should be set in niches as well as ones of Vastudévatas. Most deities in the
strata of the
are common to Panini and Patafijali as well, and pertain to the earliest
manuscripts not much distant from the age of Patanjal i.
Architectural Features
astra, refer to various
Early Buddhist and Jaina literature, as well as Kautilya’s Arthas
in the early centuries B.c. and
types of structures and their embellishments prevailing
Bharhut, Sanci, Bodh-
in the Saka-Kusana and transitional periods. Bas-reliefs from
third centur y a.p.) corroborate
gaya, Mathura, and Amaravati (c. second century B.c. to
a picture of a contemporary
this literary testimony. Such evidence can conjure up
bastioned and turreted gate houses
Indian city, with moat (parikha), rampart (prakara),
ttalakas), ornamental gates
(dvarattalakas or gopurattalakas), corner-bastions (karna buildings, such as the royal
private an d public
(tdranas), and busy streets lined with
a) , shops and emporia, punyaéalas, caityas, and an
palace (raja-prasada or raja-nivésan
resi dential houses (including multi-storeyed
assortment of small, medium, and large
mansions).
rs
pal ace ha d val
ari ous typy es of pavilions or chambe
roy al or
The mansions and the can dra éga la, sim hap any jar a, or harmya). A kutagara
agarasala, former norma lly was
(known as kutagara, kat o any upper storey; ; the
pav ili n on roof with
kiitagarasala was a roofed f, the lat ter rec tan gular, with a vaulted
ical roo n type
square on plan with a con pis or kal aga s. A candragala was an ope
ll stu a
gabled ends crowned by sma -st ore y. A sim hap anijara usually was
on the sky
of pillared pavilion, normally
Pan-Indian style
» Bodhgaya, and
” on an Amaravati relief
dignity, gave a similar sig brella (chatra), a mark
nificance. of royal
Frequently the dais was enc
losed by a raili
(sthana). This became in
due course the
describing the cait
sion “kia-véyaddi,” n , the Aupapatika-sq
whi y interpreted as “havi
slab altar.” The term i i
t
y of bamboo or timber
structed of brick or masonry, , this védika 5
and ultimately of
Shrines of yaksas, nag st one.
as, and other divi
B.C. (copiously referr nities worshipped
ed to in early Budd in the early centur
Yaksa-shrines are call hist and Jaina ies
ed jakkhayatna or of literature) were
ten simply cétiya, of th is sort.
bhav
i rksa-caitya” while of
Bynes
stlpas, su orted by t
3 pp y he fact that
ae
wi
“6 Ba®
Fig. 3. Sdtici. Relief showing circular
shrine Fig.6. Bharhut. Relief showing
at Jétavana, c. first century B.c. pillared pavilion,
labelled “Sudhamma-dé
vasabha,” c. second
century B.c,
MAURYAS, SUNGAS, KANVAS, KUSANAS, KSATRAPAS
Ky q
a7 PoO @® wi Sos f
century B.C.
hakara pavilion, c. second
Fig. 8. Bharhut. Relief of large sab
10
Pan-Indian style
iodorus (a Yava
Taksaéila)
MAURYAS, SUNGAS, KANVAS, KUSANAS, KSATRAPAS 11
of Bhagabhadra (c. 131 s.c.), the fifth Sunga king, the other erected by Gautamiputra
Bhagavata, the ninth Sunga ruler, in his 12th year, attest to the existence of Vaisnava
shrines. The first referred to must be the elliptical shrine for which foundations have
been excavated near to Heliodorus’s pillar.
Three inscriptions from Nagari, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan, refer to the con-
struction of a stone wall that encloses a place for worship of Sankarsana and Vasudéva
by the Bhagavata king, Sarvatata, who probably belonged to the Kanva dynasty. The
site preserves a massive stone enclosure and the plinth of an elliptical brick temple.
The Nanaghat (District Poona) inscription of Naganika of the first century B.c.
refers to the performance of Vedic sacrifices by the Satavahana royal family and opens
Candra-
with obeisance to such divinities as Dharma, Indra, Sankarsana-Vasudeéva,
,
Surya, and the Lokapalas (Yama, Varuna, Kubéra, and Vasava).
Sodasa (c. a.D.
An inscription from Mora (Mathura) of the reign of Mahaksatrapa
in a stone shrine.
10-25) records the installation of images of the five Vrsni heroes
engrav ed on a doorja mb, records
Another Mathura inscription of the same reign,
of Bhagavan Vasudéva.
construction of a shrine, térana, and védika at the mahasthana
images of the Buddha and
Numerous Kusana inscriptions also refer to the setting up ofthem.
for
of Jaina Tirthankaras and to the foundation of shrines 226, records
than, dated A.D.
An inscription from Nandsa, District Udaipur, Rajas
a, Indra,
performance of Vedic sacrifices following construction of shrines to Brahm
Prajapati, and Visnu.
ctural Remains (Fig. 11)
Maurya and Post Maurya Periods: Stru
) to the early Kusana period, evidences
From the time of ASoka Maurya (c. 272-232 B.C.
shrines and from surviving foun dation
s of constructed shrines suggest
from rock-cut
: and apsida
(vrttayata),
that temples existed in circular (vrtta), elliptical ( oa Sakae ara)
lhe (capak
contain inscriptio ns of
forms. The Ajivika caves at Barabar, District Gaya, Bihar, which
circular and elliptical hut-forms
Asoka and his grandson, Daéaratha, preserve both
with domical or vaulted roofs. The fagad e of the Lomas Rsi PaveNeR heats nase
. 3 ved rafters (gopanasi) within an ogee-shaped
timber sa-arch,
gavak rted
suppo by cur hae lik hit nce f the entra
frame of laminated planks, crowned by He atte wet Kireae Ou
repr ‘alavatavana (latticed wickerwork)tor 12 ae ; ‘
od is the plin th of a Se Pee eae
‘ eae to Me Maurya peri ke ae
n. ae a k
District Jaipur, Rajastha
stiipa-shrine that survives at Bairat, ple no. 40a a me rok ae
na, the shrine was preceded by small praggriva. Tem
K s
an apsidal stone temple of the Maurya period Ter
ual eon ae a e at
ace iGoc es hall
“AS ee
superstructure built of timber. Another unus
was unearthed at Rajgir (Rajagrha), the ancient cap ne 7 bat only the foundations
been identified with the Buddhist Jivakamravana-vihara, e a ie:ren
St ellip
We tical brick
An apsi dal bric k temp le was also exca vated at Se
survive.
hall formed part of the Ghositarama at Kausambi, the persia in subsequent
Structural forms prevalent during the Maurya Be ener Sanci, Bodhgaya,
centuries, as recorded in numerous bas-reliefs from d ae 5 was more popular
Mathura, and Amaravati. The apsidal plan in thls aie Ane 8begin to replicate
than either the circular or elliptical plan. ee an d naves, and side aisles,
complex wooden structures with apsidal ends, per ; tylar apsidal shrines in
but the type was not restricted solely to Buddhist use. T Na esa: Temple no.
x47)
at Sonkh near
Mathura (
13
MAUR YAS, SUNGAS,
SUN KANVAS,
A KUSANAS, KSATRAPAS
ghatapal-
ear on rel ief s at San ct, occasionally surmounted by
and plain bell-capital app h a ghata
ani mal s (Fi gs. 11a -b) . A Bod hgaya relief shows a pillar wit
lava crowned by
bull (Fig. 11¢).
base and capital surm ounted by a standing
12-13; Plates 4-6, 8)
Kusana-period shrines (Figs. phical refer-
to th e thi rd cen tur.y A.D we get copious epigra
From the first century B.c. , Naga, Buddhist,
and Jaina shrines (the
ata
ences from the Mathura region to Bhagav da), stana (sthana),
The temp les are known as pasada (prasa
last call ed Arha taya tana ). a, ayatana, and
val aya ), dév agr ha, - davakula, dévakulik
mahasthana, dévala ya (dé ehouse of the
sab ha or ayagasabha and the gat
hall was cal led
harmya. The temple darakothaka (dvarakésthaka). There are also refere
nces to torana
temple was known as ntly men tioned mean! ing
a railed enclosure
Vea dik a is fre que ur mound at
pillar-bases from Jamalp
and to torana-prasa da.
-t hr ee of the sto ne
around a temple. Th ir ty records that
in s of Hu vi sk a’s vihara, bear d onative
tu te re ma ber, have
Mathura, which consti
ka. ” The upp er par ts of the pillars, presumably of tim
label the bases ‘“‘kumbha
perished.
14 -
Pan-Indian style
Se
CSSA
|
Deveserecacociscciw sere?
MAURYAS, » S SUNGAS,
. KAN NV AS, KUSANAS, KSATRAPAS 15
n g ti na m e n
st ginse base, adorned with cable aces ae Cee):
The inscribed kumbh akas are s quare, ste
: sturd
circ ° mber or stone : or even ot ed
a
._In reliefs from Mathur a, we get representations
of
: and with
with a ghat
ppe d an inverted-l e rim
riaeee ste
bitimber, shaft risi ng abov e, with
rae haeeaa
an oct ae ; ably
Ab 5 ofS ea oes
mad e of timb er.
sheath-like member m diem
and ae d abacus that : supported a bea :
a broaad steappeloose
(Fig. 12b), th
2 a had no base le ough the
ae ea ee faeKusana pillars at Mathur ular cap as eke
a semi circ
shaft is square, with are
cetapenaligeen b 4 ee
Som e exa mpl es have a thin abacus surmounted
dard’ Geuall ie vielded ae ce
lion (Fig. 12c). Mathura
has PINCUS
e
ornate elses easuch an octa gonal shaft, i
a winged
inve rted
abacus, and
lotus capital, , thithin(Fig.
z
orting a hi , hl 12d
addorsed animal s at the top :supp g a highly ornate, flaring bracket ip za)
l
Buddhist sta pas and shrines of all sects w het
gs
kas;
by stone védi tDe
a
ereh enclosed reco from
c e e
5 shrine, how ever, has been vere d
p s
plete plan of an actu al Kusana
i
tions at M
cass
ha
T”-s ped form
ht
at
.
m a
and
2 eS Tn ite
ost available
were
SS
8 ments
frag
composed of gakhas carved with
of d oorways
patravalli or eae
from Mathu
5
parkot
ant pil
ndo-Corinthian vintage,
ases, and are 5 urmounted
» and a bold k alaga. by
elements seem tod niches m ade
d of a images
bricks and
from the stapa bea fey 8 lend of ornam
Gandh
ental The a mass
f; of carved
gures s as well
e figure
Sayi
yy
MAURYAS, SUNGAS, KANVAS, KUSANAS, KSATRAPAS
the
close to a mahavihara in 127 of the era of
Ing body relics of the Buddha, was built Kalac uri era of
a. If 127 is referred to the
Kathika” rulers, during the reign of Rudrasén rapa king
stupa, within the reign of the Ksat
A.D. 248, one gets a date of a.D. 375 for the aséna
n agrees with legends on coins of Rudr
Rudraséna III. The script of the inscriptio of the inscrip-
and while the donative part
that bear dates between A.D. 348 and 378, engraved with the “Pratityasamut-
tion on the casket is written in Sanskrit, the lid is original. This
ct which is a variant of the Pali
padasitra” written in a Prakrit diale Other
od no later than the fourth century a.p.
might also suggest an approximate peri are dis-
early forms of architectural ornament
brick remains which give evidence for
cussed in the next chapter.
Krishna Deva
REFERENCES
Journal of the U.P. Historical
of Architectural Pieces in Mathura Museum,”
V.S. Agrawala, “Catalogue
of The U.P. Historical Society,
1-160.
Society, XXIV-XXV (1951-52),
of Brahmanical Images in Mathura Art,” Journal
V.S. Agrawala, “Catalogue
Miscellaneous Figures,”
XXII (1949), 102-210.
of Mathura Museum Jaina Tirthankaras and Other
V.S. Agrawala, “Catalogue Society, XXIII (1950), 35-147.
Journal of The U.P. Historical aeology, Mathura, Allahabad
of Sculptures in the Curzon Museum of Arch
V.S. Agrawala, Handbook
1939.
to Panini, Lucknow 1952.
V.S. Agrawala, India as Known
V.S. Agrawala, Indian Art, Varanasi
1965. ient India, Oxford 1967.
Indian Coins in the Brit ish Museum, Coins of Anc
John Allan, A Catalogue of the of Hindu Iconography, Cal
cutta 1956.
Western
Nath Banerjea, The Development (Archaeological Survey of
Jitendra Kathiawad and Kac hh
on the Antiquities of
James Burgess, Report
ch of the
India, X), London 1876. ’ Journal of the Bombay Bran
Data in Jaina Canonical Literature,
Moti Chandra, “Architectural
(1951), 168-182. II. Bodhi-gharas,”
Royal Asiatic Society, 26 Indian Architecture: I.
Gities an d City-Gates, etc.;
“Early
Ananda K. Coomaraswamy, -217.
Eastern Art, II (1930), 209-235. n Art, III (1931), 181
n Arc hit ect ure : Ill. Palaces,” Easter Tem ple -Ty pes , ed. by
Ananda K. Coomaraswamy,
“Barly In dia
hit ect ure : IV. Hut s and Related
“Barly In dian Arc
Ananda K. Coomaraswamy,
Michael W. Meister,
Res 15 (1988). York 1927, 41-49.
Indonesian Art, New
History of Indian and 1928-1931.
:
Ananda K. Coomaraswamy,
Yakshas, 2 vols., Washington Temple at Bodh Gaya,
London 1892.
Ananda K. Coomaraswamy, or the Great Buddhist
Mahabodhi,
Alexander Cunningham, Stupa of Bh arhut, Lo
ndon 1879.
Alexander Cunningham, The on 1972. ati,”
Buddhist Rock Temp les, Lond ia: a Stele from Amarav
- Vidya Dehejia, Early
of Scu |pt ura l Art in Southeast Ind
“Beginnings
A. Ghosh and H. Sarkar, 168-177.
‘Ancient India, 20-21 (1964-65),
Mathura 1966.
N.P. Joshi, Mathura Sculpture, Period, Leiden 1949.
Leeuw, The Scythian
J.E. van Lohuizen-de of Gujarat, Baroda 1960. don 1940.
M.R. Majmudar, Chronology 3 vols., Calcutta and Lon
Foucher, The Monuments of Sanchi,
John Marshall and Alfred
3 vols., Cambridge 1951. da 1966.
John Marshall, Taxila, Excavations at Devnimori, Baro
Chowdhury, Delhi 1966.
RN. Mehta and S.N. Buildings in Ancient India,
Towns and Secular Angeles 1967.
Amita Ray, Villages, Berkeley and Los
Arts of the Kush ans,
Dynastic 6.
John M. Rosenfield, The of India, Delhi 196 hitecture,
Studies in Early Buddhist Architecture Te mp le s, ” Stu die s in Indian Temple Arc
H. Sarkar, of Indian
of the Superstructure
U.P. Shah, “Beginnings
New Delhi aaa eth
ed. Pramod Chandra, ;
Art © Mathura, Delhi Allahabad 1901.
R.C. Sharma, Buddhist and Other Antiquities of Mathura,
sta 1930.
Vincent A. Smith, The Mathura (Arts Asiatica,
XV), Paris and Brussels
de
J.Ph. Vogel, La Sculpture
18
Imperial Guptas
Parivarajakas
Uccakalpas
Candragupta II (c. A.p
. 376-413)
Vyaghra
Kumaragupta I(c.
an, 414-455)
Jayanatha
Narasithhagupta
Kumaragupta
I Budhagupta
(C. a.p. 472-475)
(c. A.n. 475-495)
CHAPTER y LA.
of -
Beginnings
é; ALD! ee ate Mae eg dann 2
Historical Introduction
ivi
ana em ire, North Indi
Following the breakup of the Kus SE ason e cn t eee eet
nt stat es, bot h trib al Aa
of small independe I (c. AD Sine gun
imp eri al stat us und er the leadership of Candragupta Pies
jadhiraja, Candragupta added to th Baha
Fbid for
dyn ast to be des ign ate d Mah ara
irst Gupta i, a Licchavi princess; he
marrying Kumaradév
7 prestige of his family by desh, and wa of i GKoea
rul ed ove r all of pre sen t-d ay Bihar, eastern Uttar Prapta (c. A.D. Te n
ave Samudr agu
succeeded by his son,
Candragupta I was , and the real founder of
the Gupta em ae ae
, a ver sat ile gen ius ,
his political, military, and PE
was a great conque ror
ipt ion pro vid es det ail s of
Allahabad pillar-inscr kings an eakareites i
. The re it is lea rnt that he exterminated many
achieveme nts the beeen
, and bro ugh t the whole of North India, with
made extensive con que sts ect imperial administra-
hmi r, the Pan jab , Mal wa, Sind, an d Gujarat, under his dir a to Kanci and
Kas arms along the east coast of Kaling
victorious Kusana princes
tion. He also carried his ng do ms his tributaries. The Saka and
of the coa sta l ki Simhal
made the rulers
wer e bro ugh t und er his influence, and the rulers of
of the west and northwest e won over as subordina
te allies. He even ee
ghb our ing isl and s wer connoisseur of poetr
and other nei his imperial status. A
sacrifice to mark uck many Se
formed the agvamédha poe ts and artists and str
lib era l pat ron of playing a vina
re the king is shown
a
and music, he was one typ e whe
inc lud ing
varieties of gold coins, est son, Ramagupta, ae
se em s to hav e bee n succeeded by his old chroniclers, but
Samudragupta
obl e end . He is passed over by dynastic
had a short reign and
an ign reign of ‘“Maha-
a ima ges fro m Vid isa, inscribed in the
ered Jin the throne.
three recently discov ar that he did achieve
ma ke cle nd son,
rajadhiraja Ramagu pt a, ”
mu dr ag up ta wa s succeeded by a seco
record that Sa ents that led to the
Dynastic chroniclers wh o ma y ha ve played a role in the ev
376-41 3) , gupta.
Candragupta II (a.D. his elder brother, Rama
sassination of dia by exterminating
the Sakas
dethronement and as nq ue st of No rt h In
ir terri-
leted the co and by annexing the
Candragupta II comp , an d Su ra st ra
from Malava, Gurjar
at ra for a world-
(Western Ksatrapas) ya , wh ic h is a title traditional
epithet Vi kr am ad it arts, letters,
tories. He took the an d co mm er ce and patronised the
encouraged trad e s court.
conquering hero. He am at is t Ka li da sa probably adorned hi
lebrated poet al
ad dr introd uced
and sciences. T he ce la rg e qu an ti ti es and o f many types: he
gold coins in ter Ksatra pa coinag
e.
Candragupta II issu ed latter modelled af
rrency, the
copper and silver cu
Uttarapatha style, I.A.
WAN
i’
wWodanaiv: Try ?
( Ao C penSesepaw Pues
fy,
. ©
Bp
/weaty
7
alee
He acl WIDNV
oy
-egeumug sores :
Ry OM
Vuood
8
Sia
patra g
ISVNVUVA
Je =. i
Bien a
es
dads NN
Ui rdIvig,
aad
20
GUPTAS AND THEIR FEUDATORIES ~ 21
and
i ee Be eae Se eal ovely ahi. ca strong
ine= hate ie eS
onda es by an elevated i
emperors were inspired P 7d
ration, North India enjoyedpeace, prospen’y,Sculpture an
benevolent administ
: in all spheres of life and thought.
Gupta age (c. A.D.
tive upsu
cedented creapoet rge dance, and musici were cultivated in the
architecture, ry, dram a,
350-550). , dia had come into cont act with many foreign
civiliza-
By the Gupta period, In cae and Roman-Syrian; she freely borrowed art-
Iranian, Hellenistic, Pa ebma
‘ons —— d and abs orb th em so that ai eC GAG
to moul ES AG
aul cre the genius Th e pre ced ing art of oe a DE
al ga m. e
an Indian cultural. am nee e
continue a
eign art-mo tifs. This process aifek aect
permeated with for aft er the conquest of aw sa
iod , par tic ula rly hoe a
ing the Gupta per Gupta ke a pa
to the wes ter n sea board. Many Motifs of ion-hea ;
access croll, harpy, centaur,
the aca nth us, yin e-s
trated by
22 Uttarapatha style, I.A.
format of the doorframe, and even the plan of the early Gupta temple (which seems
designed partly after the Roman-Syrian prostylos or templum in antis). While recep-
tive to forms from past contact, India in the Gupta age built on that amalgam
an art
self-conscious in its image of an Indian civilization.
Unlike the previous art of Gandhara and Mathura, which
at times was frankly
extrovert, Gupta art turned inward and achieved a brilli
ant synthesis between external
form and inner spirit. The plasticity of Gupta art
was derived from Mathura, its
elegance partly from Amaravati, but the two
underwent a sublime transformation,
manifest in all its expressions. Art under t
he Guptas attained rare poise and maturity
and emerged as the conscious vehicle
for the intellectual and spiritual urge of
Indian ethos. the
Architectural Features
Before the period of the Guptas,
architecture in In
tures, or ones conceived as if
ina timber tradition (
mes used, but no elab
ts accent on bhakti
ined the installati
’
ancient Padmavati)
adrapithas with the
, faced west
uddhist stipa-shrine
. ; (Mi rpu
ated to Naga Webel. 5. lar brick rkh
Maniyar Math as) to Madhyay dééa
modelled gs
. The ancie
roofed by vaulted domes, connected by an oblong passage with a wagon-vault roof. Its
jangha is embellished with niches containing large terracotta images of Brahmanical
divinities. The incompletely preserved sikhara is decorated with tiers of niches
show-
ing a variety of terracotta heads, busts, and full figures.
The brick Mahabodhi temple at Bodh gaya, which, in spite
of repeated renova-
tions, retains the basic form of its earl y seventh-century
construction, shares many
featur es of plan and design with the Bhitargafiv temple includ
ing vaulted ceilings of
compartments and the tall lancet window in the upper
storey of the garbhagrha. Its
garbhagrha carries a lofty sikhara of straight- edge
d pyramidal design demarcated into
seven storeys by corner bhtmi-amalakas.
Pawaya, terraced Visnu temple (not illus
trated)
One of the earliest terraced brick temp
les of the Gupta period, dedicated
al worship, has been excavated at to Brahmanic-
the ancient town of Pawaya (Padmava
the south of Gépagiri (present G walior ti), situated to
) in Dasarnadéga. The temple
receding bhadrapithas; the lowest comprised three
(about 140 ft. square) was plai
(93 ft. and 53 ft. square) were dec n; the upper ones
orated with a series of pilasters
and bottom, a broad voluted Sirs showing ghatas at top
aka, and a row of candragalika
lar form. The garbhagrha s of an early semicircu-
on the top bhadrapitha
is lost. Some stone sculpt
Visnu as well as a torana ures of
depicting Vamana and
indicating a Vaisnava affili Trivikrama were found
ation for the monume at the site,
monument, design of the pil nt. The architectural fea
i : lars, and modelling of ima tures of the
during the first quarter of the fifth ges on the toran
century a.p.
egeeeua date
no doubt that the excavated structure represents the shrine referred to in the inscrip-
tion dated a.p. 448.
Sarnath, Chaukhandi (not illustrated)
the Buddha and the
Sarnath, near Varanasi, is associated with the first sermon of
of Buddhist
establishment of the Buddhist sangha. The site is rich in the remains
that date from the third
shrines, monasteries, sculptures, and architectural fragments
century B.c. to the 11th century A.D.
fifth century, was a lofty,
An important monument, seemingly erected during the
-tower in A.D. 1588.
terraced, brick shrine overbuilt by an octagonal Mughal watch
the monument rose in three
Locally known as Chaukhandi (“the four-storeyed one”),
s of the terraces were
above a rectangular ground terrace. The facade
square terraces
the preaching attitude and two reliefs
embellished with niches. An image of Buddha in
from the clearance of this site
representing rampant vyalas with gladiators were found
ry.
and are typical of Sarnath art of the late fifth centu
Mahéasthan, brick temples (not illustrated)
at Mahasthan (District Bogra, Bang-
The excavations at the mound of Gobind Bhita
avardhana, a part of ancient
A
pediment is an elaborated Strasénaka. The upper part of the stupa proper is lost. The
Mirpurkhas stupa can be dated c. a.p. 500.
Gokul, Siva temple (not illustrated)
Gokul near Mahasthan (District Bogra, Bangladesh) had a large terraced brick temple
probably dedicated to Siva. The temple was built above a maze of foundation cells
which extended over an area 264 X 183 ft. Several terraces may be visualised. The
garbhagrha atop the highest terrace was octagonal on plan (external diam. 69 ft.),
like
the Mundésvari temple in Bihar. The sanctum has survived toa height of 1
ft. and was
seemingly enclosed by a 15 ft. wide ambulatory, its outer wall 7 to 10 ft. thick.
Though
the temple faced west, the approach to the sanctum from the top
terrace appears to
have been from the northeast where two stairways were located.
The sanctum seems to
have been circular internally (diam. 12 ft. 8 in.) and yielded
a tiny effigy of a recum-
bent bullin gold repoussé which led the excavator to
infer that the temple was dedi-
cated to Siva.
The temple appears to have undergone restoratio
n at a later period. Excavations
have yielded pottery tiles carved with Gupt
a decorative motifs including chequer,
rosett es, lotuses, triangular forms, a bird with
scroll tail, a kirttimukha, animal designs,
and a few terracotta figures typical of the
eastern Gupta style.
Nothing has survived of the temple exce
pt the plan of the octagonal sanctu
its rectangular enclosure, but the rema m and
ins provide a specimen of a terr
temple to Siva assignable to the late aced brick
fifth century representing Edika
type.
Ahicchatra, terraced brick temples
(not illustrated)
—,
|
ay}
es.
@
A
4. plan; b. section.
17:
Fig. 14. Sanci Temple no.
28 Uttarapatha style, I-A.
16-sided, and circular, with reeded bell-capitals crowned by Se earen with two
lions addorsed on each side sharing common heads on the corners (Plate 9).
This shrine, situated on the main terrace at Sarici, adjoining temple no. 18, faces
the main stupa (no. 1) and may have enshrined a Buddhist image.
Udayagiri caves, nos. 1-20 (Plates 11-26)
The hill at Udayagiri, near Vidisa,then the capital of Dasarnadéga, comprises
a low
sandstone outcrop about six miles northeast of Safici. Of 20 caves
excavated at
Udayagiri, less than half are significant architecturally; others are
plain cells or simple
sculptural panels.
Cave no. 1 (Plate 11), is partly rock-cut and partly struct
ural and Tepeats the plan
and design of the Gupta temple at Safici. It is smaller
in size and its pillars have
ghatapallava capitals with a design that becomes more
developed at Tigawa. Sockets
survive for missing salabhanjika figures at the upper
corners of the door. This cave can
be placed between the temples at Safici and Tigaw
a in date.
Cave no. 4 (Plates 12-14), known loca
lly as the Vina cave, measures 14 ft. x
8 in.; it is noteworthy for its doorfram 11 ft.
e, with four ornate éakhas and a pro
overdoor. The broad first gakha i minent
i i
-angles to
enshrining the Saptamatrkas
. This cave (
Cave no. 4’s structural ma
ndapa, which
this cave to just aft
doorframe and their depiction in contraposto are reminiscent of famous friezes ean
Gadhwa and suggest a date late in the first quarter of the fifth century, perhaps no
quite during the reign of Candragupta II as suggested by the later Nagari inscription
.
Meister and Williams both suggest a date of c. A.p. 430-450, and a similar
doorframe
from Tumain (Plate 34) can be associated with an inscription at
the site dated c.z.
117/a.D. 436.
Cave no. 20 is located high up on the northeastern end of
the hill. It is fairly large
but is an irregular type of excavation, about 50 ft. long
by 16 ft. broad, divided into five
chambers by rough cross-walls. Two of the central
chambers are carved with paired
niches bearing relief figures of seated Jinas which
are badly mutilated. The most
significant is an image of Parévanatha seated on
a double lotus with a pedestal carved
with dharmacakra flanked by devotees
and framed by pilasters of the same
as the stambhaéakhas on cave no. 19. The design
cave bears a foundation inscription dated
G.E. 106/a.D. 426 that seems to record
the installation of this image of Parsv
anatha.
Udayagiri, structural Gupta temple
( (not illustrated)
On top of the Udayagiri hill are
remains of a large platform buil
that once supported a structural t of segmented cells
Gupta temple. The stub of a
Cunningham found a “wis h-fulf sta mbha survives, and
illing-tree” capital here. Fra
show patravalli of an early pat gme nts of a doorjamb
tern, a pilastey wi
ribbed “pot”-capi
“ i
alas (
8 being dist
quarter of th ribut
e fifth cent
ury i
Plate 34)
GUPTAS AND THEIR FEUDATORIES
.
frame, with a “T”-format, has survived. It is composed of five sakhas. The first, third,
and fourth are carved with designs of patravalli, the second with vertical registers
showing mithunas, chequers, and patravalli motif, and a stambhasakha with square,
octagonal, and 16-sided sections, surmounted by a “reeded-bell” or lotus-capital
but
capped by a plain square abacus. Heads of river-goddesses at the base are visible,
| the full figures are not exposed.
| The “bell” capital is seen on doorframes at Safici and Udayagiri (cave nos. 6 and
17 and the ruined structural temple on the hill), the latter assignable to the reign of
| Candragupta II. A éakha with a patravalli design showing vertical stems is also present
on a doorframe set into the main temple at Sarnath. The mithuna figures seem dumpy
| and clumsy, and the doorframe may have been executed by a rural guild.
to
Tumain has yielded a fragmentary Gu pta inscription dated a.p. 436, referring
tent
the reign of emperor Kumaragupta, and th e style of the doorframe seems consis
with that date.
Eran, Narasimha temple (Plates 35-37)
Bétwa river, Eran (ancient
Situated on the left bank of the Bina, a tributary of thement
Airikina) in Dasarnadééa was a flourishing Gupta settle from the time of Samu-
temples,
dragupta up to that of Bhanugupta (c. A.D. 511). Four, dilapidated, east-facing
Garuda standard
assignable to the fifth-sixth centuries, survive as well as a monolithic
dated a.p. 485 in the reign of Budhagupta. site, now
shrine at the
The northernmost Narasimha temple was the earliest
8 ft. 9 in.) garbhagrha and an
almost demolished. It had a rectangular (12 ft. 6 in. x
, now surviving only in fallen and disjointed fragments
ornate doorframe of five sakhas
(Plates 35-37). The first and third sakhas were carved with §almali blossoms, the
There
second was mithunasakha, with Gajalaksmi at the centr e of the saubhagyapatta. ning
s on the lintel; the remai
were five human couples on each jamb, four yaksa couple
mukha s, jambh akas with scrolls stemming
registers were occupied largely by grasa
bottom of each jamb were single
from their navels, kinnaras, and ihamrgas. At top and
ing a vase and standing on a makara
figures; the lowest on the right shows Ganga carry
d). The fourth sakha
(the corresponding figure of Yamuna is almost com pletely deface
on the left and a
was carved with padmavalli emanating from a seated jambhaka
es the surviving frag-
standing yaksini on the right; the fifth stambhasakha resembl
asakha shows
ments of pillars from the mukhamandapa. The lower part of each stambh a
ing a male deity (a Vaisnav
a pavilion canopied by candrasalika, the left one harbour
nha. Bracket figures
pratihara or ayudhapurusa), the right a figure resembling Narasir
these were pratiripakas
from the lateral extensions of the doorframe are lost; probably
depicting Vaisnava themes.
tulasangraha in
Seven courses top the lintel of th e second sakha; a minute row of
rasalikas harbour-
the shape of female heads; a kapotapalika adorn ed with seven cand
a long
ing sirhhamukhas and kinnarivaktras; a recessed course simulating jalamala;
Ganééa, the end
frieze of 13 registers of which the central one is carved with seated row of
and ihamrgas, a
ones with makaras, the remaining with vidyadhara-mithunas
with simhamukhas)
reversed triangle design; a long frieze of tulasangraha (carved
17 candragalikas inset
alternating with kinnarivaktras; and a long kapotapalika with
Survey of India drawing of
with lotus flowers or female heads. An old Archaeological
ukha and elephant.
this doorframe indicates that the sill bore designs of grasam
imha that bears a striking affinity
The temple enshrined a 7 ft. high image of Naras
this image is now erected on a
to the Narasimha image of cave no. 12 at Udayagiri;
dapa of four pillars, as at
platform nearby. The temple was preceded by a mukhaman
34
Uttarapatha style, I.A.
if
il
Safici and Tigawa. From the surviving fragments, the pillars had a form and design
similar to those at Tigawa. The carving is crisper than that at Tigawa, but still conforms
to timber tradition; the female heads and busts within the candraéalikas recall terracot-
ta figurines from Rajghat. The capitals have a fluted-pot shape, as at Tigawa, but no
leaf-turnovers at the corners. These fragments may represent a temple later than cave
no. 1 at Udayagiri, providing forms taken up later still at Tigawa. ~
Tigawa, Kankali-Dévi temple (Fig. 16; Plates 38-44)
The somewhat later Kankali-Dévi temple at Tigawa, also in Dasarnadééa, practically
duplicates the dimensions and plan of Safici temple no. 17 but has more ornamenta-
tion on the doorframe and pillars and introduces a large padmatapatra ceiling in the
mukhamandapa (Plate 39). This is among the earliest Gupta temples to be erected over
a jagati, of which the lower mouldings were kumbha followed by kantha. Lion-
brackets crown the pillars and pilasters of the mukhamandapa, as at Samii, but are
heavy by comparison. The pillar-shafts are adorned with a variety of ornaments (Plates
38, 40), including diverse lotus designs and grasamukha spewing pearl-chains. The
bell- or inverted-lotus capital at Safici is replaced by a dharanvita ghatapallava (fluted
vase) with foliage turnovers. Ghatapallava becomes a characteristic trait of later Gupta
and post-Gupta orders. The phalaka supporting the lion-brackets is decorated with
paired candraéalikas on each side containing simmhamukhas or charming kinnari-
vaktras. ; é
The temple’s doorframe has five sakhas (Plates 42-44). The first and third are
carved with éalmali blossoms, the second and fourth (except for a small portion of the
latter carved with patravalli) are left plain. The first and second follow the rectangle of
the door, with heavy beam-ends above. The third and fourth take a “T’”-shape. The
outermost stambhagakhas use the same design as do the pillars of the mukhamandapa.
defined by vahanas but
They support figures of Ganga and Yamuna, iconographically
taking the posture of salabhanjikas underneath trees. es
of pillars and the Lis a
This temple marks some advance in the ornamentation
ae ae
tion of ghatapallava; it seems later than Safci by a couple of decades,
A.D. (Meister and Williams bo
possibly datable to the first half of the fifth century
date this temple after a.p. 450.)
jangha;
the the Ga
Biche lower moulding
ert shows mala in
i place of padma. Thisis rapakantha
ru ivi
divides
Temains of a rectan
ft outside) ensh gular
» 48 Were the neig ri ni ng the Varaha
the largest temple hb ouring shrines im age
at the site but no
thin
4 and is set on a ja
nh a squa gati 6 ft. 9 in.
| idapa, of whic re internally, 15
the 39 ragmen ft. 2 in. square
by two dévakuli tary
mala) flanked pillars remaj
kas, of. . i
Py, er Cook
ers
GUPTAS AND THEIR FEUDATORIES 41
The jagati, 55.5 X 35 ft., rises from a plain kharasila and is composed of kumbha,
kalaga, and an early form of kapotapalika without intervening antarapatta. Above the
kapOotapalika (as restored by the Archaeological Survey of India in 1979) is a plain face
capped by a heavy fluted usnisa which serves as parapet (Plate 68).
The garbhagrha stands on a foundation of two plain courses of stone; its védi-
bandha is composed of kumbha, kalasa, and kapétapalika. The jangha rising above the
védibandha, as is usual with temples of this period, is plain, capped by a kapdta-like
moulding. The courses above the kapota have collapsed.
Among the fallen fragments found around this temple (Plates 71-72), a substantial
number pertain to two types of friezes: 1) those measuring from 11.4 to 12.6 in. high,
carved with niches framed by pilasters and carrying figures largely of ganas, apsarases,
yaksis, or mithunas alternating with floral patterns or grasamukhas; 2) those measur-
ing about 9 in. high with rectangular niches containing ganas alternating with blank
sunk niches with arched tops. On the analogy of the Gupta temple at Dévri (Madhia),
which shows a pair of similar recessed friezes girdling the sanctum above the kati, it
has been suggested by Pramod Chandra that the Bhumara friezes originally occupied a
i)
li
NS
es
NY
—Z!)
Bra
doorway.
Fig. 19. Bhumara. Siva temple,
land of date-palm
asak ha, and the third is carved with a gar
seco nd is ratn of the first
valli, the
a ghat apal lav a sup por ted by a jambhaka. The lower part
design, rising from umbrella-
es of rive r-go ddes ses of which Ganga, flanked by an
two éakhas bore figur fitted into the mandapa.
doorframe proba bly
bearer, is preserved. This ghatapallava at the base,
a plain shaft, decorations of -
and ardhapadma beneath the bhat
Two Ruc aka pila ster s have
and vandanamala suspended from a manibandha in mos
squ are at bas e and top, with ghatapallavas, and
rana. Surviving pil lar s are ded from
and 16- sid ed sec tio ns emb ellished with chains suspen
cases have octagonal , ardhapadmas, and iha
mrgas. One pillar pub-
a, yaksas
grasamukha or manibandh and plain fluted shaft.
sho ws a gorgeous ghatapallava-base
lished by R.D . Ban erj i the two previously
jam b of a thi rd doorframe smaller than
The fragmenta ry left a yaksa, stam-
has : pat rav all i ema nating from the navel of
mentioned shows thr ee sak nds Ganga
wit h gri vrk sa des ign . At the base of the first Sakha sta
bhagakha, and a third and wit h a mala-vidyadhara near her
head. A
la- bea rer
flanked by a female umb
rel asakha, which has a
red pan el ove r Gan ga’ s head is repeated on the stambh
che que umbrella-bearers.
er oct ago nal section flanked by female ent
subshrines as also may a corpul
and an upp
ghatapallava-base
from one of the
This doorframe probably comes
seated image of Ganésa.
44
Uttarapatha style, I.A.
and latticed windows, indicating that the site had perhaps half a dozen other Gupta
shrines.
Some architectural members are fixed to later structures, such as the Téliya Madh
and the Ripani temple, built about 100 years ago, situated about two furlongs south of
the Parvati temple. The Téliya Madh has four entrances and to each are fixed
architectural pieces. Its south entrance has a large doorframe of which only the last
sakha with the srivrksa design and the upper portion have survived (Plates 60-61). The
kapdta is embellished with five candrasalikas and four pairs of playful pigeons (as at
Ajanta cave no. 15); the extended arms of the “T”-format contain reliefs of Varaha (left)
and Narasimha (right), a pair of striding, winged vyalas below. The architrave shows
a row of 29 female heads, as seen also on the Narasimha temple at Eran and the Visnu
temple at Pipariya. This doorway is assignable to the last quarter of the fifth century
A.D.
To the western entrance are fixed two jambs of a doorframe showing three sakhas,
carved with patravalli, mithunas, and pilasters, with river-goddesses at the base. The
uttaranga of the doorframe was also recovered close by, carved with patravalli flanked
Surya
by salabhanjikas, a row of vidyadhara-mithunas flying towards a large relief of
capitals, grasamukha on the
on the lalatabimba. Ornate pilasters, having ghatapallava
candrasalikas. This
abacus, and plain curved brackets, support a kapota carved with
doorframe somewhat resembles that of the Parvati temple and may be coeval.
with ghata-
To the north entrance is fixed a pair of highly ornate pillars carved
us patrava lli, and sensuo us figures of
pallava at the base and capital, bands of luxurio
d windo w with figures carved
loving couples. These pillars, like the fragmentary lattice
centur y A.D. eB
above them, are assignable to the last quarter of the fifth
survi ving sakha s show ing rosettes and srivrksa
The jambs of a doorframe with two head of a jambhaka, are
design, the latter emanating from a ghatapallava held on the
cognate with the pillars just
affixed to the east entrance and are of a style and date
discussed. Similar observations are applicable to an old doorf rame fitted in the mod-
shaped format, has three
ern Riipani temple nearby. This doorframe, with a minor “T”-
ng jambhakas,
sakhas adorned with patravalli, mithunas alternating with load-beari nas converg-
d with flyin g vidy adha ra-m ithu
and érivrksa design; its uttaranga is carve
the lalatabimba.
ing on a relief of seated Gajalaksmi forming ni temple and another modern
A dilapidated structure to the east of the : Ripa
mile further south have reused pillars of
temple at a place called Lakhorabagh about a forms vary considerably. The
disparate types. Most have ghatapallava bases but their
ar, others 16-sided, fluted, some square
shapes of the shafts also differ, some circul of design and ornaments,
below and circular or of mixed shapes above. On the basis
temple, others are affiliated to the
some pillars are stylistically close to the Parvati at Dévgadh. The impact of Vakataka
Bhimara temple, and a few to the Gupta temple
temple, is more perceptible at Bhimara and
art, which is nominal on the Parvati traceable on the loose
taka elements are
becomes marked at Dévgadh. Since some Vaka
architectural members from Nacna, there is a point in Walter Spink's attribution of
this region between c. A.D.
these fragments to the Uccakalpa rulers who flourished in
of the Vakatakas, which may
470-535. Vyaghradéva (c. a.p. 470-490) was a feudatory
atha (c. A.D. 490-510) and
explain some impact of Vakataka art; his successors Jayan
no empire, but used the Gupta era in
Sarvanatha (c. A.D. 510-535) owed allegiance to region, however, was only
their inscriptions. The Vakataka factor in the art of this
minimal.
46 Uttarapatha style, I-A.
e
Heo a
( my
»
:i
hee
Ihb/|
aSS
CRs ECR
: sat
==
Aotnat
pean
(Sx
CRED
Te
FEN
[o7)
fo) 7 °
>
;
themes including amdya
dance and music.
Between the ste ia
GUPTAS AND THEIR FEUDATORIES 49
another shows Ra ?
vana
GUPTAS AND THEIR FEUDATORIES
¥
worshipping Siva by offering his heads, with nude ganas in the flanking medallions;
the largest portrays mithunas; while a fragmentary one portrays a flying vidyadhara
couple (the male playing a vina). One pair of siirasénakas is flanked by amalaka(s). The
site has yielded amalakas of various sizes (Plate 83) and loose pieces of a kalaga and
bijapuraka that once must have crowned one of the sikharas.
The paficasakha doorframe of this temple is elaborate, lavishly embellished with
figures and decorative ornament (Plates 85-86, 88). The innermost sakha is carved with
luxurious patravalli issuing from the navels of seated pot-bellied jambhakas; it en-
twines four ganas in its convolutions. The second sakha shows salmali blossoms; the
third, amorous mithunas alternating with pairs of load-bearing kumaras. The fourth is
a highly ornate stambhasakha; the bahyasakha is embellished with srivrksa. The inner
two sakhas continue the same designs on the lintel; the third shows mala-vidyadhara
mithunas converging on a central image of Bhogasana Visnu as the lalatabimba. The
stambhaégakha is a Rucaka pilaster; its upper third shows short octagonal and 16-fluted
sections, supporting a ghatapallava and plain square abacus. Each stambhasakha is
embellished with two shrine models: the lower shows $urasénaka in the first roof-tier,
amalasaraka. The
a candragala flanked by amalakas in the second tier, and a crowning
Each shrine model is treated as
upper model repeats the design but without amalakas.
a niche, framed by pilasters; the lower model harbours a divine attendant carrying a
floral offering, the upper one a dancing gana.
separated by
The stambhasakhas support a pratoli comprising paired kapotapalis
a running band of védis. The kapotapalis are addorsed by three surasénaka-pediments
issues from a
and two simhakarnas harbouring grasamukhas. The outer malasakha
in its lateral extensions
ghatapallava supported on the head of a load-bearing kumara; the
between
above stand images of Ganga (left) and Yamuna (right). The recessed space
on the jambs and a
fourth and the fifth sakhas is relieved by a geometrical floral pattern
lintel.
running frieze of alternating kumaras and “keyhole ” niches on the
occupi ed by Vaisna va pratiharas in
The lower fourth of the inner two sakhas is
two gracefu l female attendants
elegant tribhanga. Each has a prabhamandala and
amukha s above the door
standing below the third and fourth sakhas. The frieze of sirmmh
the top of the kati. (The
has been accommodated by cutting away the kapotapali at
door was sheltered originally by the broad projecting chadya.)
b figural compositions repre-
The bhadras on north, east, and south contain super Each
yi Visnu (S).
senting Gajéndramoksa (N; Plate 82), Nara-Narayana (E), and Sésasa
The first éakha is carved
recess is framed by two sakhas and a pair of heavy pilasters.
vanam ala as seen also
with patravalli emerging from a gankhanidhi; the second shows
pilast ers are Rucaka
in the doorframe of the left aisle shrine of Ajanta cave no. 21. The
(on the north) or kum-
and stand on an ornate ghatapallava-base resting on nagapasa
ning sides. The upper
bhika (comprising kalaga, antarapatta, and kapota) on the remai
half of the shaft is profusely ornamented.
tes alternating with
The brackets carry a lintel carved with a rich pattern of palmet
hands of a hovering jambhaka.
luxurious patravalli, its stems held centrally in the
The architrave depicts a band of sirnhamukhas alternating with countersunk panels
the
containing “keyhole” niches. This band supports the kap6ta-cornice that crowns
kati.
und, only the pitha
Of the two subsidiary shrines constructed in the same compo
of the jagati has survived; this is composed of khura- kumbha , flat kalaga, and an early
form of kapétapali. One is located south of the main temple and has a rectangular plan
and, since north is
(30 x 48 ft.). The second is located to the north of the main temple
favoured for a Dévi shrine, may once have enshrined an image of Laksmi.
52 Uttarapatha style, LA.
N
Fig. 22. Sakr. Siva temple, plan.
Two surviving pillars (9 ft. 3 in. hi
praggriva preceding th
Gupta Brahmi (the latt
rway.
Fig. 23. Sakor. Siva temple, doo s. The
Th e jan gha c on si st s of 11 plain as hlar course
(Fig. 24b). one is preserved;
it
i
ae form of kapotapali of thr ee sla bs, of which only ng .
mp os ed mo ul di
roof of the garbhagr
ha was co any interven ing
abo ve the top of the ja ngha without courses of
now is pla ced dire ctly
dit ion , we lack kno wledge of the top of the
damaged con ce, the decoration
Because of the temple’s an da pa and its ent ran
of the gudham
the jangha, the features iy
of its roof. and rounded sec-
jagati, and the courses h square, octagonal,
a plain Sivalinga wit ked “meander”
e The temple enshrinessakha doorframe (Fig. 23) shows, first, 4 lin
ions. The sanctu m’s tri asakha is carved
rcl es fil led with padma. The rap
and sem ici a at top. The
pattern of half-squares kum ara , apsarases, and a gan
showing loa d-b ear ing on the Parvati
with seven panels ste d gar lan d motif seen also
ished with the twi le that of
malagakha is embell er sak ha is con tin ued on the lintel whi
design of the inn ésa as the
temple, Nacna. The as to eit her side of ten-armed Nat
ed by flying vidyad
har a stambhagakha and
the second is replac ca pp ed by a grasamukha, acts as by a
lalatabimba. The rup
asa kha ,
dra gal ika s. The kapétapall is capped
ee can ha surrounds the
i adorned with thr hes. The outer gak
supports a kapotapal nd of su nk en nic
as at Bhumara.
running ba its lateral extensions
recess showing a fig ure s in
standing mi th un a ses, standing
overdoor, containing mut ila ted fig ure s of the river-goddes with 17
the jambs show d by tulasangraha
The lower parts of rella. Th e doo r is cr ow ne
an umb
in tribhanga under
simhamukhas.
54
Uttarapatha style, IA.
Among known Gupta stone temples, this has the largest sanct
um (10.5 X 11 ft.). It
also is exceptional in havin: g a gudhamandapa.
Its doorframe has close affinities to ras
of the Bhimara temple in its style and choice
of motifs but shows a more develope ;
iconography. The temple seems about two decade
s later than Bhamara and is assign
able to a date no earlier than c. 500 A.D. (Willi
ams dates it to c. a.p. 530).
Sarnath, other remains (Plates 92-9
5)
Sarnath has yielded a large number of Budd
hist images and architectural member
i uries. The fa s of
straight-edged ch
tuld-ends with step adya, br
ta with a single level of ped ardhapadma-
tulani
55
GUPTAS AND THEIR FEUDATORIES
p
1h
PAKISTAN
Krishna Deva
REFERENCES
Main branch
Vatsagulma branch
Gautamiputra
Sarvaséna I
(c. A.D. 330-355)
Rudraséna I
(c. A.p. 330-350) Vindhyagakti II
(c. A.D. 355-400)
Prthviséna I
(c. .D. 350-400) Pravaraséna II
(c. A.D. 400-410)
Rudraséna [I = Pr
abhavatigupta
(Cc. A.D. 400-405)
Sarvaséna II
(Cc. A.D. 410-450)
Divakaraséna
Damédaraséna
(c. A.D. 405-420) Pravaraséna II
(c. a.v. 420-450) Dévaséna
(c. A.D. 450-475)
Naréndraséna
(c. A.D. 450-470) Hariséna
(c. a.v. 475-500)
Prthviséna Il
(c. A.D, 470-490) (name unknown)
[Source: Mirashi.] (c. av. 500-510)
CHAPTER 3 LB.
|
:an style: Early Vi4darbha style,
Rnn
iBegi 7Ai MR ge In di
Historical Introduction
comple-
Re e of the Puné plat es of Prab havatigupta, which refer to the
eee the problem of the origin
sae. years of Vakataka rule at been practically settled
(deny rate of the main Vakata debate). The researches
exac t loca tion of their capi tal is st
BENG v ae the Ghatotkaca
espe cial ly his revi sed reading of line of
a Naietarny
clea red the conf usio n regarding succession also in the
Fe ae ta caves, have
(modern Bashim in District Akola). This has
akataka branch of Vatsagulma during the concluding years
of the main
the chr ono log y and eve nts
helped to put ter Spink have
sty in a prop er pers pec tive. Mirashi and Wal
pea of the dyna the basis of
tor ica l fra mew ork for som e of the events of this dynasty on
| A oa ed an his
di’ s Dag aku mar aca rit a, a romantic narrative of the
Dan
eR asie to Vidarbha in has put the careers of the last kings of the Vatsagulma
q century A.D. Spink s of art-
t time-bracket on the basito power
t of Har isé na, in a tigh
peraed especially tha Vatsagulma branch, which rose
ce. The
storical and historical eviden in any case disappeared
from the
rd cen tur y 4.D. , had
the thi
around the middle of of the fifth century 4-D-
politica l stag e by the end te d on the bas a is of
of the mai n bra nch can reasonab ly be reconstruc aras e na II,
fie: The genealogy n of Prav
the majo rity of which pertain to the reig n of Prav aras e-
eir copper-plate pta
bha vat igu
gran
.
ts,
The se usua lly start with a conventional mentio rent -
son of Pra the branch, appa
see ms to have been held in great esteem by the kings of
I, who ‘ven the title of Samr at,
ce of anum hmin
y because of the performan peya sacrifice (which only a Bra
performan ce of the Vaja
which he earned by the that he had performed
a subs titu te to the Aévamédha). The fact it is not known
could undertake as f indi cate s his sovereign status, though
four Aévamédha sacrific es itsel occurs ina
In the Pura nas, Pravaraséna, whose name
where he had his dom inions .
at Purika and Canaka, two
cities that seem
to hav e rul ed
controversial passag e, is sai d a Brahmin
Vin dhy as. Mir ash i onc e thought that Vindhyaéakti,
to be fort-towns in the (modern
sta rte d his car eer som ewh at in the central Deccan
I,
and father of Pravaraséna himself in Vidarbha after
the disintegration of the
des h) and est abl ish ed from the
Andhra Pra
f the opi nio n that the Vakatakas were
0 -plates
Satavahana empire. He
thus was
Vid arb ha reg ion . The discovery of a set of copper
the nge his
beginning associated with ast y sty led the “M undas” made Mirashi cha
al dyn
| issued by a Brahmin roy Vak ata kas came to Vidarbha some
time during the time
tin g that the range and
regions around the Satpura
opinion, sug ges
ire included the
of Pravaraséna I, whose emp
60 Vidarbha style, LB.
a Nandivardha:
Pin, ~
aN -=Q ws aR.
eH A
andhal
Gok
aS )
HYDERABAD
©
MILES OQ 20 40
of R
have survived, but imitations in brick and stone have been found. Three brick shrines
at Mandhal and one at Nagra have been exposed. Shrines at Mandhal consisted of a
garbhagrha and porch, sometimes preceded by a flight of steps. ‘Another type was a
shrine raised on an oblong platform, approached by flights of steps from lateral sides.
also
This often was accompanied by an ablution tank. These brick structures show
;
partial use of stone for pillars and walls.
from the use of brick
Temple remains near the pond at Mandhal show a transition
to stone. The temple there rises on a pitha with simple mouldings , one imitating a
with pilasters and
stylised ghatapallava; on the wall is a vedika pattern alternating
figures). Other
shallow niches (decorated respectively with rosettes and pramatha
decorative patterns are manibandha and padmapatra.
elevated platform, with projec-
The more elaborate brick temple at Nagra had an
tions and recesses, displaying different mouldings.
ashlars have so far been discovered
Specimens of structural stone temples built of
. A zoomorphic Varaha there is housed in
only at Ramték and reveal a variety of forms
an open pavilion (Plate 101). Two Narasimh as are enshrined in temples that consist of
(Figs. 27-28; Plates 111, 117-118). The
a closed, pillared mandapa and garbhagrha r
a pillared mukhamandapa and a rectangula
Bhogarama temple (Fig. 29; Plate 124) has prese rved the
ma shrine, which has
vithi leading to two garbhagrhas. The Trivikra
an open mandapa with a dwarf wall.
enshrined image but not the garbha itself, had
is essentially a cave-temple.
The shrine presently known as Guptarama
types of stone in construction; plinth and
These structural stone temples used two the main
of a local variety of sandstone, while
walls, as also some pillars, are made pilla rs are of
are usually of basalt. The basalt
load-bearing pillars that support the roof octagonal
heav y Ruca ka type ador ned with full or half lotus-medallions and show
a pillars
part, capped by cruciform brackets. Some
and 16-sided sections in the upper r hand , disp lay
sandstone pillars, on the othe
show ghata below the brackets. The incl udin g
section, also, with decorative patterns
delicate ornamentation in the middle
swirling patravalli. rala;
r not ewo rth y arch itec tura l feat ure is the absence of a regular anta
Anothe of pillars and
and mandapa is marked by a pair
separation between the garbhagrha are noticed in at least
for windows (stambhajalakas
pilasters. Pillarets are often used
Kévala-Narasimha).
two temples, the Bhogarama and ture and
iest examples of Vakataka architec
Mandhal shrines represent the earl 300- 600. Ther e is no
tigraphical evidence to c. A.D.
have been dated on the basis of stra the site of a set
les more precisely. The find at
conclusive evidence to date these temp was an impo rtant
indicates that Mandhal
of copper-plates issued by Rudraséna II
centre in the early Vakataka period.
(not illustrated)
Mandhal, shrine at Bongi Hudki
This shrine’s remains are in hilly te rrain know
n as Bongi Hudki situated c. half a mile
south of the village of Mandhal. Nothing remains exce pt the plinth.
adi Talao (not illustrated)
Mandhal, shrine on the bank of Varh
the Varhadi Tala6 are the remains of a
—..
————__-.
LSTNe ees
if
56
F. 9 1 2 3
i
Thee astern face of the plinth has three parts. T he flanking proje ctions are simple
(c. 16.5 ft. wide);
ide); the middle
i projection, however, provides for steps is c. 46 ft. wide,
and ne pea re-entrant angles.
g. 25), its monoton
e rm is sim ple but attractive (Fi
of the pla tfo e equilateral faces ae
broken by be sses at regular intervals. The thre
Bae ia 8 ni eae and rece tions, each measuring 6 ft.
7 in. wide.
jec
(Theicomesae ven pees and eight pro wide.)
at smaller recesses c. 2 ft. 3 in.
Thoushthe pa ed by somewh tructed, the mid-
a out lin e of the gar bhagrha cannot be recons tre of the middle
dle point of its aans would have had to coincide wit
h the cen
rede ene sang outline . The pranala tra ced in the northern half of the
(we st) of the pli nth
platiamaieen ted in the mid dle recess of the northern
arged into a cistern accommoda
face.
recesses and projections, rising
Th
above Ds
i eesof the platform shows wide of tall fluted columns
ase Me 98). The recesses each contain a pair
hiner shan 99) while the projections
: ape base and an elaborate capital (Plate
one a connie seat-slab, and probably Ruca-
saan a with a vedika-like member, is about 8 ft.
area
(Plate 100). The extant height of the platform
the ae 3 Oe later constructions in
e garbhagrha was disturbed because of
the earlier brick
randieealfarn of the latter cutting through
es (the stone foundations t the garbhagrha mea ed c. 17
sur ft. x 19
constructitions). Enough remains to indicate tha
;
. The out er wal l of the
ft. 8 i
i ae was preceded by an antar ala c. 10.5 ft. square too, was broken
a maximum thickness of 14 ft. 9 in. and its outline,
ints Se ad ;
Te eee and recesses. huge brick platform,
eb method of
:
construction was adopted in building this
thereby ee bricks required.
sening the enormous number of
101-102)
Roce Varaha mandapa (Plates ndapa
aha stan ds wi th in a small four-pillared ma
c Var 102)
ee bey image of zoomorphi The Rucaka pillars (Plate
is restored in plain masonry. ided sect ions
abe alae short octagonal and 16-s
Th Be pair ed lotus medallions with which carr y bea ms decorated
hetiieed n brac ket- capi tals
have hea vy plai composed of
itis ies e pillars The bea ms sup port a lantern ceiling
mapatra. the Bhénsala
iestecin row of pad present roof of the mandapa was put up during
period pie ea The rate with a large
d
sho w that the original ceiling was deco
latte ieee rem
ain s to laka which was
supe rstr uctu re is now topped by an ama
restored
qioved a ion. The site. :
uring the clearance of the
26: Plates 103-109)
ah Trivikrama temple (Fig. (Fig. 26 )
surv ived . It stan ds on a vedibandha
mandapa has a version of vedika
and
con bel only a kumbha sur mou nte d by a Vak ata k
e vedika
iene ofa khura and
tall dapa. Th
sup por t the beams of the man
rf pill ars that d frieze of niches
(Fig * Fcarrying dwa ngs and is decorated by a recesse
simple mou ldi rting pra-
aud oat stands above are ado rne d with dancing an d cavo
The nich es and are filled
eens ce (galapadas). apa das have a border of manibandha
7) and the gal ghata at the
itil o (Plates 106-10The ars (Pla tes 103, 105) are Rucaka with
dwarf pill by a
oral patterns. the upp er part of the shaft (separated
bottom and two ardhapadwhic ma meda llions on cushion capital (Fi
g. 26).
h is cro wne d by a on the inside
short octagonal section) by a row of festoons and
the out sid e than their
. The beams are embellishe d on ukh as, bot h larger and cruder
as § irn ham
y a register of tula-ends carved
66 Vidarbha style, I.B.
Gupta counterparts.
The corner basalt pillars rise directly from the eer edi Sa a pe
a eae plain
Rucaka shaft with a short neck of five alternating octagonal an
above the cushion-capital is a bracket of plain curved profile.
The existing roof of flat slabs belongs to the Bhonsala period.
The colossal image of Trivikrama probably stan oe eri
west, though the structure of the garbhagrha
ds in its orig inal Pace faci
setne
itself has completely crum ‘
—
L
N
F. 0 3 6
rs eee
OOO SO 909
BSOOOOOOO
ooooe
WoIOIO TN Geieviewrceia
ey
Védibandhas, Ramtek
: ple; c. Bhégarama temple.
a temple; b. Kévala-Narasimha tem
a. Rudra-Narasimh
70
Vidarbha style, I.B.
rama, built directly on the rock without a jagati. This Ramték, is the temple of Bhoga-
temple consists of two shrines, in
Fig. 29; Plate 124). Both shrines face east
and have central catuskis. Pedestals against
the back wall of each were used presum-
ably for images. The two shrines are separated
by a narrow passage and open into a
pa having six pillars. This had been con-
verted into three chambers, with niches and
doors, by later occupants of the Maha-
randah on the south side.
dha (Fig. 30c) consisting of kumbha, broad
e, pattika, a second kandhara sandwiched
Bombay 1954,
V.V. Mirashi,
VAKATAKAS (MAIN BRANCH) Mt
Ootacamund 1963.
pus Inscriptionum Indicarum V),
V.V. Mirashi, Inscriptions of the Vakatakas (Cor
Indology I, Nagpur 1960, 12-20.
V.V. Mirashi, “Location of Ramgiri,” Studies in
at Ramt ék, Nagpur 1959.
Méghadita Méin Ramgiri Arth II, Sholapur 1961,
V.V. Mirashi,
ent Capi tal of the Vakatakas,” Studies in Indology
V.V. Mirashi, “Pravarapura: An Anci
272-284. IV, Varanasi 1966, 53-58.
Literature,” Studies in Indology
V.V. Mirashi, “Ramgiri in Jaina in Indology IV, Varanasi 1966,
42-52.
Studies
V.V. Mirashi, “Ramgiri of Kalidasa,” 1964.
atak a Rajv amsa ka Itihasa Tatha Abhilékha, Varanasi
V.V. Mirashi, Vakd
edition, Bombay 1966.
Nagpur District Gazetteer, revised
l
es of Pravarsena Il,” Journa
hekhar Gupta, “The Date of the Maso da Plat
Ajay Mitra Shastri and Chandras
a, 11 (1984), 114. Journal
of Epigraphical Society of Indi Plate Charter of Pravarasena II,”
ekhar Gupta, “Masoda Copper
ash
Ajay Mitra Shastri and Chandr
of Epigraphical Soci ety of India, 10 (1983), 108-116. iki, 20 (1977), 42-43.
ndh ala Utkh anan ,” Vida rbha Samé6dhan Mandala Vars VI (1966), 135-156.
ary Analysis,” Ars Orienta lis,
Ajay Shastri, “Ma
Walter Spink, “Aja nta and Ghatotkaca: A Prelimin
XX (1967). Joanna G. Williams, New
Walter Spink, “Ajanta to Ellora” Marg,
nta’ s Chro nolo gy: Poli tics and Patronage,” Kaladarsana, ed.
Walter Spink, “Aja
Culture, ed. Bardwell L.
Delhi 1981, 109-126.
Art and the Gup ta Mai nstream,” Essays on Gupta
aka
Joanna G. Williams, “Vakat
Smi th, Delhi 1983, 215-233.
n, O xford 1960.
G. Yazdani, ed., The Early History of the Decca
72
Main branch
Vatsagulma branch
Gautamiputra
Sarvaséna I
(c. A.D. 330-355)
Rudraséna I
(c. A.D. 330-350) Vindhyaégakti II
(c. A.D. 355-400)
Prthviséna I
(c. A.D. 350-400) Pravaraséna II
(c. A.D. 400-410)
Rudraséna II = Prabhavatigupta
(c. A.D. 400-405) Sarvaséna II
(c. a.D. 410-450)
Divakaraséna Damé6daraséna
(c. A.D. 405-420) Pravaraséna II Dévaséna
(c. A.D. 420-450) (c. a.D. 450-475)
Naréndraséna
Hariséna
(c. A.D. 450-470) (c. A.p. 475-500)
Prthviséna II
(name unknown)
(c. A.D. 470-490)
(C. A.D. 500-510)
(Source; Mirashi.]
CHAPTER Le
4
Historical Introduction
was a close friend of Bhavviraja, the minister of the king of Asmaka. Bhadrabandhu
was assisted by another monk named Dharmadatta. The same inscription
alludes to a
Buddhist cave at the site having been founded by the eminent friar,
Acala, who is
mentioned also in the travel accounts of Hstian Tsang as founder of the Ajanta
establishment.
The above inscriptions testify that caves nos. 16, 17, and
the Ghatotkaca cave were excavated during
19 at Ajanta as well as
the reign of Hariséna. In fact, stylistic
affinities of sculpture, architecture, painting,
and epigraphs among these caves and the
remaining Mahayana caves of Ajanta suggest that
the entire Mahayana development at
the site was practically contemporaneous
. T he reign of Hariséna, which witnessed the
efflorescence of such magnificent art activity at Ajanta,
thus becomes one of the most
glorious and creativeperiods in Indian art-history. Though Hariséna’s personal
was Saivite, he followed an ecumenical policy, actively faith
patronising all art in his
domain.
Architectural Features
According to Walter Spink, who has inten
sively studied the art and architecture of
Ajanta and related problems, the development
of the entire Mahayana phase of Ajanta
took place within the space of two decades
between c. a.p. 462-482; it started shortly
after king Hariséna came to power (Spink
puts his accession to c. a.p. 460) and was
abandoned due to political disruptions
attending the collapse of the great Vaka
house. The first cave begun in taka
this phase, cave no. 8 lying next to the old
Caves, was extremely simple in plan, devoi Hinayana
d of both hall pillars and carved orna
tion. Within a very short time, menta-
three
7,11, and lower 6)
VAKATAKAS OF VATSAGULMA 75
5 F.LLO
Tegisters and
ind
(Plate 144).
p xs ;
ete ae patra-, padmalata-, mithuna-, ratna-, mala-, or khalvasakha (with che-
REFERENCES
1897.
and Sculptures of India, 2 vols., London
J. Burgess, Ancient Monuments, Temples Survey of Western India IV),
Their Inscriptions (Archaeological
J. Burgess, Buddhist Cave Temples and
London 1883.
Temples of India, London 1880.
J. Burgess and James Fergusson, The Cave
Charles Fabri, “Frescoes of Ajanta,” Marg IX, 1 (1955), 61-76.
A. Ghosh, ed., Ajanta Murals, New Delhi 1967.
I-II, London 1896.
J. Griffiths, The Paintings in the Buddhist Cave Temples of Ajanta,
Caves, Bombay 1962.
R.S. Gupte and B.D. Mahajan, Ajanta, Ellora and Aurangabad
Dasakumaracharita,’ ’ Studies in Indology I, Nagpur 1960,
V.V. Mirashi, “Historical Data in Dandin’s
165-177. Indicarum IV) Ootacamund
Era (Corpus Inseriptio num
V.V. Mirashi, Inscriptions of Kalchuri-Chedi
1955. 1963.
Inscriptionum Indicarum V), Ootacamund
V.V. Mirashi, Inscriptions of Vakatakas (Corpus
Debala Mitra, Ajanta, New Delhi 1964.
Benjamin Rowland, Ajanta Paintings, New Delhi 1956. 42-43.
Vidarbha Saméédhan Mandala Varsiki, 20 (1977),
Ajay Mitra Shastri, “Mandhala Utkhanan,” A Re-appraisal,” Journal of the Epigra phical
Ajay Mitra Shastri, “Thalner Plates of Vakataka Harishena:
Society of India, XI (1984), 15-20.
of Ajanta, London 1965.
Madanjeet Singh, The Cave Paintings (1959-1960), 259-262.
D.C. Sircar, “Inscription in Cave IV at Ajanta,’ ’ Epigraphia Indica XXXII
:
49-58.
s of Indian Art, Leiden 1972,
Walter Spink, “Ajanta — A Brief History,” Aspect
» Ars Orientalis, VI (1966), 135-156.
: A Preliminary Analysis,
Walter Spink, “Ajanta and Ghatotkaca
Walter Spink, “Ajanta to Ellora,” Marg XX (1967). Chavi II, Varanasi 1981,
Walter Spink, “Ajanta’s Chronology: Cave I’s Patronage and Related Problems,”
144-160. X (1975), 143-169.
gy: The Crucial Cave,” Ars Orientalis,
Walter Spink, “Ajanta’s Chronolology: Williams,
Walter Spink, “Ajanta’s Chrono Politics and Patronage,” Kalddarsana, ed. Joanna G.
New Delhi 1981, 109-126.
Walter Spink, “Ajanta’s Chronology: The Problem of C
ave Eleven,” Ars Orientalis, VII (1968), 55-68.
of Asian Art, XXX (1976- 77), 55-58.
Walter Spink, “Bagh — A Study,” Archives
pment of Early Buddhi st Art in India,’ Art Bulletin XL, 2 (June 1958),
Walter Spink, “On the Develo
95-104.
Vatsagulma style, LC.
(
Traikitakas of Aniruddhapura
Historical Introduction
rn
, ruled over the northe
T ee kuta-p arvata in Aparanta po litically to have been of
ee Sra ss sons of the Tri li ev ed
century A.D. They are be 11th century
aae Cnet early fourth
AG Isvarsena (from the
er
d the Abhira era of the rul
Seaene Suucep and use era) .
as the Kalacuri peak of
ann PORE was known
the coa sta l str ip of the Konkana but, at the
ruled not only the Ghats
ioe aoe amen the riv er Ta pa ti (Tapi) and beyond
southern Lata as far
as a.D. 453/4 to have
ae fae ae ae a : a pr oc la ims in his charter of
& orders of Nasik. Da hr as én ted territorial
A TLE , su gg es ti ng his considerably augmen
rif ice
the Agvamédha sac
aigns of
power,
pre ssu re fro m the expan. sionist camp
In or before A.p. 480, however, unde
r adow.
Tr ai ku ta ka po we r fell under a sh
of Vatsagul ma, ©f a.p. 493 from
emperor, Harisena
1
-plate inscription
t
fee ed , an d a co pp er ra speaks of the
theless surviv ding of a mahaviha
ee ee none ng to re co rd th e fo un tory char-
acct rsnagiri) purporti Th e Tr ai ka ta ka s not only issued dona delled
”
of the Traikutakas. asena, struck co
ins mo
fare batt prowess Dahras én a an d Vy ag hr
its greatest kings,
an Kat wo of iruddhapura, perh
aps
ap a on es . , wa s An
sa tr
of the Traikitakas,
who were Va is na va
located some wh
ere in southern
OE FeeAes va -K rs na ; it wa s
s a e te r An ir ud dha, son of Vasudé ai n. So pa ra (Sarparaka ) appears to
have
ah entification remain
s un ce rt
hes : ough its id d lost hi s independence
n their chief seaport. ds on of Vyaghrasena ha ha, the
e A.D . 53 3, Vikramas én a, gr an
o co ns ol id at ed his power10 Vidarb
ts e
bly to Krsnaraja,
wh wer, two
al ac ur is (p ro ba fo re th e en d of Traikiitaka po
aarti Vakataka dynast
y). Be
o seem to have
held
previous yas, wh
aie oe of the so ut he rn Gu ja rat and the Maur
the Suras in ed. Of the large
é ats appear: mbay and Elephanta islands. far has been reveal
possession of Bo ku ta ka pe ri od so me from the
mple of the Trai snagiri, several co
No structural te da t their
their sculpture than ral
fo un
en tr at io n of Buddhist rock-cut re im po rt an t fo r
nc mo
are small and are
co are of architectu
riod. Most
Tr aikitaka peth n
d one a
ree caves from Kanheri an precisely, iktitaka attributio
seme cav es ylistic con-
to date these
nterest. It is difficult based largely on
e mus t remain tentative, the
place the caves within
presented her
nologically
siderations that chro
time-frame.
80
Aparanta style, I.D.
Indradatta
Dahraséna
(known date: a.p. 453/4)
Vyaghraséna
(a.D. 487/8; 494/5)
Madhyamaséna
(A.D. 506)
Vikramaséna
(A.D, 533)
Naréndra
ad Narayana
81
TRAIKUT,TAKAS OF ANIRUDDHAPURA
a
S —i
ITU tS
ce EE
PT
ly
Ten H) e\u
, S
a ”:
i i i!
MT aT?
iG, !
:
\ "
ey ath |
Lerner srry ME
T Willi
| vty
vat
ey
am FN
om
H it: 1
athet| ee
‘aMW a
Its origin lies in an earlier Satavahana ord er, which had treated the Maurya/Sunga
fluted padma as a broadly faceted member.
Padma is reversed to form a sort of faceted
laguna; contemporaneous analogues
are encountered in pillars of the mukhamandapa of cave
no. 7 at Ajanta (Fig. 32a) and
three to four decades later in Elephanta cave no.
6 (Fig. 33a-b).
In lower Dravidadééa,
the Pallavas followed an almost identical technique,
but the lasuna was not differenti-
ated from the shaft. A few Pandya caves of the late seventh
adopt a similar disposition. These Traikiitaka Deccani insta and early eighth centuries
nces assume importance as
the harbingers of a form widely adopted later in lower Dravidadééa. This cave
may be
dated to c. a.p. 500 or slightly later,
Londd, cave (Fig. 34b; Plates 165-166)
The corpulent, unfinished Brahmakanta column s of the fagade
of the Lonad cave have
sharply flexed laguna and ghata, massive an d strongly ribbed
(Fig. 34b). This is
perhaps the earliest example of such an occurrence: in Ajanta, ribbed Brahma
kanta
pillars with flexed laguna are known, but their use was restricted
to the stambh
asakha
of doorframes or as thin intermediate colonnettes (Fig. 34a).
Taranga-potika has a
medial belt showing valli-decoration (Plate 166).
The central of three doorframes that 0 pen into the
vithika has projecting yaksa
figures at the bottom and stambhagakhas with ribbed laguna, ghata
, and padma, the
83
TRAIKU
KUTAKAS OF ANIRUDDHAPURA
AWN
tytn pie
Ayaan be iN\ ftWyf,
SMU6Qns ae
i i
AhS—
Krys yn
BAZ
ST
r n Tt
Hop
I
Ud
int a TE HN
TT
]
etni PeeyyyI} i
ie
wht
en |
|
ia
nie
eT
hy
il Il
i
| a
| Ke
Liga
AVycheee
ial
a
ot
ear
Reaknae
a Melt Peed
Ait
sia
+ 444
Tiga T r Ri
mns: .
Fig. 34. Brahmakanta colu a;_D. Lonad. Cave fagade
no. 16, 8 arbhagrh
a, Ajanta. Cave
period
lo pm en t f ou nd in the Maurya
deve
ich antici pate the
on and treatment of wh cav e ma y be date d to c. A.D.
500.
Th e
n the northern Konkana.
M.A. Dhaky
REFERENCES .
a, London 1880 ofessor
~ mples of Indi gy an d Me dieval History (Pr
s inIn do lo
a
James Fergusson and James Burgess, as ena, K. 284,” Studie
tvan Plates of Vikram
S. Gokhale, “Ma -9 4, 1974, 86 Oriental Art,
XV (1947),
Vo Jume), Poona Society of
G.H. Khare Felicitation d, ” Jo ur na ] of the Indian
m Indicarum, IV),
na
Buddhist Cave 0
f Lo
R.V. Leyden, “The a, Pa rt I (C or , pus Inscriptionu
84-88. ur i-Chedi Er
V.V. Mirashi, Inscrip tions
of the Kalach e Classical Age
, 2. 29-3 The Traikitakas,” Th
an: Il.
Ootacamund 1955, x1 -xliii estern Dece
62, 192-194.
Gupta A 3); Bombay 19
D.C. Sircar, “Deccan in the Peo , 2 (1967), 1-67.
sto ry and Cul tur e of the Indian in gs Un kn own,” Marg, XX
(Hi Th
i
o ra: Shapes of
alter Spink, “Ajanta to Ell
|
|
LE.
CHAPTER 6
of No rt h In di an st yl e: Ku r nkanadesaea style,
Beginnings 0-610 yle: Ku
c. A.D. 54
Mauryas of Puri
Historical Introduction
(Krsnagiri) is
of the Tra iku tak as of Apa ran ta in the vicinity of Kanhéri
The presence apparently did not rule
of a.p. 493/4; they, however,
attested to by an inscription heast, islands including
the isla nd of Sals ette. Further south and sout thern Konkana,
a minor dynasty, the Mauryas. Sou
bey ond
wer e in the pos ses sio n of
Elephanta a Central Indian
(Go a) as its pivo t, was governed by the Bhojas,
with Gomant aka in the fourth
t ext rac tio n who may hav e settled near Goa sometime rn
dynasty of ancien
s see m to hav e van qui she d the Bhdjas and added the southe
century A.D. The Maurya by the middle of the sixth
island possessions; however,
Konkana to their coastal and sub ordinate to the Kalacuris, as
had the Traikutakas
y per hap s had bec ome the Bombay
century, the vit e scu lptures and monuments of
The fam ous Sai by Walter
a generation earlier. ed bet wee n Cc. A.D. 525-550, as argued
bee n exe cut cal patron-
islands may all have pro duc ed under the immediate politi
mor e lik ely ectural
Spink, though they were acu ris , as he arg ues . (The cessation of archit
of the Kal of artists and artisans
age of the Mauryas than domains and the migration
550 in the Mau rya ld, in fact, seem to
activity by c. A.D. and of the Kalacuri empire cou
in the hea rtl
to Ellora [Elapura] er of the Kalacuris.)
ord ina tio n of the Mauryas to the pow of dynasts
indicate fin al sub
rem ain s poo rly def ined and a sequence
urya s varma
The history of the Ma cop per -pl ate cha rte rs, one by Maurya Candra
Two short r, were found in
cannot be ascertained. Ma ur ya Ani rjitavarma of his 29th yea
of his second year, the
oth er of to the southern
ur ya s ha d by the n extended their sway
Goa, suggesting that the
Ma not be identi-
h the sec ond charter was issued, can
a, fro m wh ic image of
Konkana. Kumaradvip in Goa , but cou ld even be Elephanta. An
island s to the spread of Maur
ya
fied; it could be some not far from Goa attest
a on the coa st tio ns. Ma ur ya
trade and political connec
Harihara from Go ka rn
if imp ort ed, sug ges ts
style and polity or, erior power.
no era, nor toa sup vis-a-vis the
charters refer to
ya s are un kn ow n, their feudatory status
ur s is still guess-
The origins of the Ma pos session of the Bombay island
d Kal acu ris an d the ir Ravikirtti dated
Traikatakas an for cer tai n. The Aihole eulogy of
is kn ow n lukya
Nalas, and Kadambas by Ca on
work, but their en d
bd ui ng of the Ma ur ya s,
a.p. 634 mentions the su her of Pulakééi II; a second refere
nce in the inscripti
D. 566 -59 4), fat
Kirtti var ma (A. Mauryas, through a
cap tur ing Pur i, the island-capital of the
wit h at, the
credits Pulakési,
is mu st ha ve ta ken place after a.p. 610). During the first defe,
naval victory (th who
los t the so ut he rn par t of their domains to the Calukyas
Mauryas apparently iri District); he was
d the ir go ve rn or , Sv am ir aj a, at Révatidvipa (Rédi in Ratnag
statione
86 Kunkanadééa style, LE.
Gharapuri)
Spunk
Tratkotaka
Maurya
Kalacuri
GOA
pr
87
MAURYAS OF PURI
ngalé
ééas (a.p. , 594-609) and then r eplaced by Ind -
L d by the Calukya re gent Mangal
kille
(Almost cane ae ane
ae Mauryas are not heard of after the Aihole notice.
by the Portuguese many centuries
of the Bombay islands, in fact, until their occupation
later.)
(The profile of the figural sakha shows valli carving; Plate 180.) The space above the
lintel seems to have been reserved for some narrative, now eaten away.
three
The south vithika is as long as the great hall to which it pertains; it has
(Plate 178)
doors, the central one flanked by grilled ventilators. The central doorframe
The uttaranga
is important, its sakhas much like those of the western doorframe.
shrine- models remindi ng one of
shows Valabhi and Pharsana (with fluted ghanta)
the sides of the overdoor
Maitraka-Garulaka parallels. Ganga and Yamuna figures fill
Brahmak anta pilaster
(Plate 178). A cell to the southwest of the vithika has a carved
showing a Salabhanjika (Plate 176).
The JogéSvari cave may be dated to c. a.D. 525.
84)
Mandapéévara (Bombay), cave (Plates 182-1
ly destroyed) of the Mandapesvara
The rather wide vithika (its front columns complete
of the fagade are of an archaic ribbed
cave has bays at north and south. The pilasters
the upper belt of its square section 1s also of
type (upper section); the ornamentation of
s also seem archaic. The corresponding
an older variety (Plate 183). The bay-pillar belts
panels and
with well-carved
pilasters are of a ribbed ghatapallava type
(Plate 182). a,
a large but damaged central figure of Natés
The west wall of the southern bay has
at Elephanta. The northern doorframe on
and subsidiary figures seem older than those The
nd showing sandwich pattern (Plate 184).
the west wall has five sakhas, the seco heavy archaic stam bhas akha , its
doorframe has
mukhalinda in front of the garbhagrha overdoor and the
of the ribbed pillars. There is an
upper part formally similar to that
one damaged. The decoration remains un-
lintel shows five plain tilakas, the central
finished. c. A.D. 525 for
Architectural members and figura
1 carving support Spink’s date of
this temple.
-192)
es (Figs. 35b, 36; Plates 185
Elephanta (Gharapuri), cav ets a
i was pro bab ly the cap ita l city (“puri”) of the Mauryas.
Elephanta (Gharapur the large ie oO
personal faith of the Mauryas,
direct evidence obtains on the alty and ruled was
e cav e-t emp les wou ld ind ica te that the religion of both roy
Saivit
_ primarily Saiva. he island, of which the Mahégamirti cave
s exist on t we f
Six rock-cut Saiva shrine
(cave no. 1) is the most famous. The other five eprece ded it in time, however, judged by
of Maurya styl as found on Salsette are ee
their style. All the generalities a {Ses a
e developed their own nuances,
but the Puri guilds seem to hav el. The strength o al at
0
com pet ent han dli ng of the chis
vision, and mor e cture : ar
ve ser eni ty and a dee p sen se of transcendence. es ite
gives way to a sua dual perfection as well as
art icu lat ed, eac h com pon ent striving to achieve indivi
bet ter
the harmony of the ensemble.
to become incorporated into
Elephanta, cave no. 3 (Plate 185)
struggling to
cave show s the Maurya column-type
The north bay of this unfinished ecting belt, under
The lowe r sect ion of the shaft is octago nal; an octagonal proj
emerge. (Plate 185).
developed laguna, presence of tatt, etc., bespea k of a transitional form
Elephanta, cave no. 4 (Fig. 36; Plate 186)
along the
nish ed rect angu lar cave has nort h and south bays and three cells
This unfi somewhat better
like those of cave no. 3, stunted but
west. The columns of the bays are
90
Kunkanadééa style, LE.
maha-patti
2 galapada
gana(-sthana)
ay
® ardha-vrtta kampa
vrttakumuda
F.||0 b
Fig. 35. Adhisthanas:
a. Kanhéri, Cave no. 41,fagade; b. Elephanta. Cave no. 1,east facade.
ls.
doorframes to minor cel
Fig. 36. Elephanta. Cave no. 4,
is sand hara; the garbhagrh
a has a
f-c olu mns (Pla te 192 ). Th e ca ve res, that
umns and hal ta-s tair way, flanked by lion figu plain,
of its own and a hast ihas
moulded adhisthana gar doorway has first a
bha grh a doorway. The paficasakha
lead s dire ctly to the
Brahmakanta stambhasakha, and final-
rou nd sak ha, next sandwich pattern, then
thin ,
(Plate 189). f of this grand
ly two plain éakhas of Maurya style is met with at Ellora; the influence Surastra
The next phase Wes ter n Ind ia, up to Gurjaradésa.
throughou t low er
and subtle style was felt s wholeheartedly took
, but Maha-Gurjara arc hitect
style is retrograde wit h litt le vis ion consequences. The
of sta mbh aéa kha , wit h significant aesthetic halls; for full
up the Maurya form
din g co lu mn was not so suitable for structural
ls.
Maurya type of free-stanss and space not easily provided in structural hal
effect it needed both ma caves,
ya pil lar occ urs at Badami in rock-cut
A modified version
of the Maur (strangely, sometimes
ah ma ka nta. Its derivatives
or ri bb ed Br y in Calukya
ut the seventh centur
rm
whether in round fo als o me t th ro ug ho
r) are
with Traikitaka flavou
centres in upper Dravi dadés a.
M.A. Dhaky
REFERENCES
“ ON :
hanta Caves, Bombay 1957.—_Eka Adhyayana (Gujarati), Svadhyaya,
Pramod Chandra, A Guide to Elep andiré-nan Adhistano
M.A. Dhaky, “Dakhkhani Layana-m
14.2 (1976), 163-171.
92
Kunkanadééa style, LE.
Krsnaraja
Sankaragana
(known date: A.D. 593/4)
Buddharaja
(a.p. 608/9, 609/10)
Historical Introduction
Vakata-
ntu al bene fici arie s of the vac uum created by the sudden end of
Among the eve a foreign immigrant tribe
initially,
e the Kalacuris (perhaps
wer
ka power in the Deccan in an ignifi important “office-bearer”). The
for “Kalacuri” is Turkish in orig h success in c. A.D. 484/5
aka s’ pla n to ove rth row the Vakatakas may have met wit the western
Asm
aka s as a con seq uen ce may for a while have held
(Spink) and the Asm including nos. 26
terr itor y of Vat sag ulm a (so me of the latest caves at Ajanta,
Vakataka n). The N alas consolidated
hav e bee n exc ava ted during Aémaka occupatio e thought to be
ha, and Maharaja Subandhu, onc
and 27, ma y
Vidarb
their position in southeastern dern Mahéésvara)
h of Anu pad ésa , settled at Mahismati (mo
an early Kalacu ri mon arc main line of Vakatakas.
along the Narmada, contro lling the heartland of the erstwhile dha-
the Tra iki tak a mon arc h Vik ram aséna had a grant issued from Anirud
In a.p. 533, y,” possibly indicating the los
s of his
bed “Kalacuri cit
pura, his capital, which he dub with this sur-
to the Kal acu ris (Ka rl Kha ndalavala, however, disagrees the Kalacuri
independence Walter Spink). It is not certai
n who
mise of Shobhana Gokhale and
power; he could br ing
Lata and Ap
(Nasikya) or Govard
hana territory to his burgeoning monarc
Whether in Satikaraga hy.
the southern Konkana to na’s ¢ ja’s
Victorious in the no
Calu kya Kirttivarma of Kuntal
a. Sa
BOTT
nkaragana apparently coi
rth as far a
_ After that, and be
fore a.p. 60 1 (probably
Sankaragana’s succesor,
taking advantage of the fresh incumbency
i of
Buddharaj
t
» though the site of the ba : is li l
ned. a Sake
hwestern portions ttle is not mentio
of the Kalacuri kingdom, as far gS eed
Calukyas. Buddha Se Anipa-
-valley Possessions, as ra ja , ho we ve r, was
well as of Lata and firmly in pele nis country,
uld issue a charte much of the aa
Cha-visaya (norther r in A.D. 608/9 fr Bivrilzas
n Lata) was still in his do om Vi di sa, and in ae
a ch ter from Saras-
vani near Baroda mains as attested by
, arte
Soon after A.D. 61
ably of Rastrakita orig0, the Ellora area apparently was gi; ven ov Art
in
grant of a.p. 630 pe , by Calukya Pulakééi II to win him ov
er to St ead aroeb-és
rtains t er to his si HE NC
n Nasik area, doub
ly confirming
oeTLs
© retren
ada, reconciling th ch within their ancestral land in the ace
€ reaches of the Narm
entering into matrim emselves to a much
onial relations reduced territory.
Manyakhéta, they wit h
survived long enou
Period. gh
Ellora
of Saivism and of Bu
ntinued to be a Bu ddhism.
also is discerni ddhist ce ntre of activity.
ble at Nasik.
Structural temp
les of the Kala
Placed on rock curj p eriod are un ,
-cut temples availa ble, and reli; ance
architectural co for deduc i has to be
here
inherited a
» at the same ti
me
nd sculptors sc
hool
KALACURIS OF MAHISMATI
A 1
AND EARLY RASTRAKUTAS OF ELAPURA 95 ;
Meardha-vrtta vajana
wo
}ksudra padmas
a F.
"pattika
kapota
ardhvapatti
kantha
~ adhahkampa
kumuda
padma
jagati
d
IG
Fig. 37. Adhisthanas, Ellora: ade;
Cave no. 29, west fag
a. Cave no. 26; b. 4. Cav e no. 5.
th facade;
c. Cave no. 29, nor diminished
of the pre ce ding century wit h
nta tio n uriated
style continued forms
and orname the Maurya style, it lux
ies of expression; unlike
variet major styles at Ellora
excellence and reduced The juxtaposition of these two
in rich and abun da nt orn ame nt. different levels of
int era cti on, to dif fer ing degrees and with of Bagh in
results in their inevitabl
e
iou s exa mpl es. Remnants of the style
orption in var api reg ion also
adjustments and abs and inf lue nce s fro m the Calukya art of the Vat
lower western Malava ory.
ed into Kalacuri territ and need deeper and
detailed
seem to have percolat thus are ve ry co mp le x
riod con-
Problems of “Kalacur
i styles”
de ve lo pe d at Ell ora during the Kalacuri pe etration
t
yle-complex thaKalacuri hegemony had ceased, with gradua l pen
study. Theflost
urish lon g aft er t figural sculp-
tinued to
in the do ma in of hieratic and attenden who
of Karnata influence,
particularly
n wa s fac ili tat ed by the Rastrakitas,
of southernizat io
ture. (This process
96
Late Vidarbha style, LF.
pattika
kapotapalika
| vajana
3
1
- vetra
b F.IL° c
Fig. 38. Adhisthanas, Ellora:
a. Caveno.2; b. Caveno.12; c. Caveno.14.
Caene
x
Oo)
xv? Jask©
IED)
w9I WAAe
G
\\
ON
Ise
DK
Cave no. 2
the pedyas (Plate 219).
ures an d pra tih ara s on
and ratnas akha (Fig
. 39). At
snes AN eae fig fl ow in g pa dm al at a) mala-,
ng gracefully b ut has bahya-,
atone one a (showi ha fr am e has no ud um ba ra
vative of
wae cave no. 6,a catuhsak (Both these instances are, in part, deri ern
eae Ae plain sa
kha (Plate 220).
tan ce at Ell ora wh ere sandwich patt
is the only ins
ma a types.) Cave no. 10
way (Plate 215). models (Fig.
urs on a subsidiary door 6 and 7 at Au ra ng abad carry shrine
s of cave nos . ra; those from
aie: doorway lintel temples, mu ch lik e tho se found in Surast
lar shrines
Pharnsana probably circu
then See at Elléra show round, cates a
dhist group, ? epli
cav e no. 7
(Plate eae cave and g, am on g the Bud
e no.
). The facade to cav amples C
ha ll. These few ex e.
all ail ; Fig. AOa ed Ph ar sa na -r oo fe d
ht-edg patronag
es 1 ti-tiered, straig ngs under K alacuri
ry structural buildi
ome idea of contempora
cade (Figs. 40c-d)
Elléra, cave no. 10 (Vigvakarma), fa mples may have
alacuri struc tural te of
e typ ted on the fagade
Some conception of th le models depic th e
had can be gained through t niches flanking
perstr uc -
pediments
the40c)
cave no. 10 at Ellora, particularly from(Fig. lower sec tion of a su
has the eo
to the left
great central gavaksa. That d below a Valabhi)
having skandha (eave, 0d) depicts the
ture above the figural panels over
sana. The pediment
pe a pyramidal Pham of an early Nagara temple,
ronton of a §ukanasa
Suraséna-front.
Ellora, cave no. 9, facade (Fig. 40e) f above the upper
full-fledged t hr ee -t iered Pharmsana roo
Much larger is the profile of a
98
Late Vidarbha style, LF.
[iene
Sata eeaeeee:
7 serine
{5 a?
Seas wl
if sf
Lee
rainy: :
:
yak
Oy ial
hl
‘Wii
“
E ii sare era a ierear
PRAGA siallaleleDlsialalale
sin ay fa
Ta rate Me HN
pry ; beta
Wyre Hil it Hie I
y te" y
“as
e
UT ulURUNNRR uaoseeaD
REFERENCES
Society of India, X
Inscriptions,” Journal of the Epigraphical
S.K. Bajpai, “Bagh Hoard of Copper Plate
(1983), 86-89. Svadhyaya,
Adhisthano — Eka Adhyayana” (Gujarati),
M.A. Dhaky, “Dakkhani Layana-mandir6-nan
14.2 (1976), 163-171.
Temples of India, London 1880.
James Fergusson and James Burgess, The Gave Indicarum, IV, 1), Ootaca-
of the Kalachuri-Chedi Era (Corp us Inscriptionum
V.V. Mirashi, Inscriptions
mund 1955. (1967), 1-67.
es of Things Unknown,” Marg, XX, 2
Walter Spink, “Ajanta to Ellora: Shap Orien talis , 10 (1975 ), 143-1 70.
Crucial Cave,” Ars
Walter Spink, “Ajanta’s Chronology: The the Amer ican Acad emy of Benar es, I (1967), 11-22.
,” Bulletin of
Walter Spink, “Ellora’s Earliest Phase India n Histo ry, XLVI (1968),
Early Kalchuri Period,” Journal of
Walter Spink, “Monuments of the
263-270.
100
A.1.
Magadha style, II.
Genealogical Table:
Later Guptas
Krsnagupta
Harsagupta
Jivitagupta I
|
Kumaragupta
Damédaragupta
Mahdsénagupta
(c. a.v. 600-630)
Madhavagupta
Kumaragupta
Historical Introduction
ed in Madhyadesa by the
The vacuum created by the fall of the Gupta emp ire was fill er
rted as petty feudatories und
Maukharis and in Magadha by the Later Guptas, w ho sta
A.D.
the Gupta emperors towards the close of the fifth cent ury
, Kumarag upta was the first to assume full
Pe leieas the Later Guptas of Magadha over Malava.
ence. His successo r, Damédaragupta, established control
Mee credited with a victory over
ia eatince the next chief, was a powerful ruler, had to cede
In his late years, Mahasénagupta
ee a e e Brahmaputra valley). I, and the Kalacuri
g its invasion by the Maitraka king, Siladitya
agupta was obliged (according to the
Sank a followin
a aragana. After the loss of Malava, Mahasén
and Madhavagupta to the Thanéévar court
4 sacarita) to send his sons Kumaragupta
© wait upon the princes Rajyavardhana and Harsavardhana.
y minor power confined to Magadha.
anes Later Guptas thus became a relativel rdinate ally of emperor Harsa, but his
subo
pta had to remain contented as a
a havagu r Harsa’s death, regained authority over
son Adityaséna, who came to his throne afte ions). Adityaséna
Magadha and the contiguous tract of Anga (attested to by inscript excellent
a pious and powerful king who is credited with the building of an
was a temple for
terraced brick temple at Aphsad and
temple of Visnu identified with the His quee n built two
Anga, now District Bhagalpur).
nee at Mandaragiri (ancient mother also construc ted a matha.
at Aphsad where his
Ad Ss at Mandaragiri and one tagupta I,
descendants, of whom the last, Jivi
dityaseéna was succeeded by three This confirms
at Dév Baranark, District Shahabad.
engraved an inscription on a pillar navasin, after whom K
priest of Siirya called Varu
land granted in favour of a hereditary
the village is now called Baranark. a rich
avardhana o f Kanauj, received
The Later Guptas, Maukharis, and then Hars dh a was kn own
During this perio d, Maga
cultural heritage from the imperial Guptas. Madh yade sa for
at Nalanda and Bédhgaya,
for important Buddhist establishments Nala nda was in-
, and Kasia (ancient Kusinagara).
establishments at Sarnath, Sravasti lear ning . Thes e esta blis hments were
of Buddhist
ternationally celebrated as a centre to maintain and
with land and reve nue and successive rulers took care
end owe d hmanical
. Like the Gupt as, thes e rule rs personally were devoted to Bra
augment them states that
tutions of all sects. Hstian Tsang
deities, but supported and respected insti enue to men of intel lect and
th of the crown’s land-rev
Harsa’s policy was to allot a four
a second to support a variety of sects. 575-650.
da, two are assignable to c. A.D.
Of the surviving monuments at Nalan
.A.1.
Magadha style, II
Ob
Of
OL
O1
OS
68
VHAVOVIN
v aJA9s ePsapeAupeyl
© ahys eypeseyp
102
LATER GUPTAS AND MINOR DYNASTIES in
Architectural Features
to the easy
as a popular building material due
In the Ganga basin, brick continued have had
settlements in the region must
availability of clay and firewood. Ancient ns of such brick
with terracotta tiles. Abundant remai
many shrines of-brick, adorned spread over the
been reported from excavated sites
temples and terracotta tiles have da, Rajgir,
Gange tic basin. Better known sites include Pataliputra, Vaisali, Nalan
entire in Uttar
Bihar) and Rajgha t, Sarnat h, Kasia, Bilsad, Sankisa, and Sravasti
Aphsad (in i
Pradesh. ;
temples at Nalan da, Bodhgaya, Rajgir, and Aphsad.
Magadha also preserves brick to provide formulas
templ es, while relati vely simple in the Gupta period, begin stupa-like corner
These its four
Site no. 3 at Nalanda, with
for later temple complexes. found also slight ly later at Bodhgaya.
ates a pafic ayata na structure as is itself begins to
early in the seventh century,
towers, simul
structed
(The Bodhgaya temple, as recon in stone.) At Nalanda, archit
ects also had
probably first developed
incorporate features the exper! -
broug ht from the neigh bouring Rajgir hills but
experimented with stone 2).
temple (no.
ment remained confined to a single
221-222) | ,
Rajgir, Maniyar Math (Fig. 41; Plates a brick-and-stucco
in Ma ga dh a is the Maniyar Math,
The earliest surviv ing tem ple indrical, with bhadra-
design. The temple is cyl
and
structure of unique plan ft. diameter). The
tio ns at the car din al poi nts and a circular interior (of c. 11, and plain pattika.
projec ed kalasa
ha of tall kumbha, well-form
temple stands on a védiband ed with at least 13 niches, framed by pilasters that show
The temple also was embellish sections. The
h square and octagonal
on lot us- ped estals and shafts with bot ma on some
gha ta- bas es
n was emb ell ish ed with a large ardhapad
upper part of the square
sec tio ated; vestiges
con tai ned stu cco images which have disintegr
onc e well as
pilasters. The niches
of Gan ésa on the sou th bhadra. Old photographs as
remain of a seated figure a Sivalinga, four-armed Vis
nu
ons atte st to the exi ste nce of nine other images:
descripti NatéSa.
ures of nagas, and six-armed
(east bhadra), nagini, five fig this tem ple und erwent restorations and
vious structures, ar wall of
Built on the ruins of pre are replaced by a plain circul
alterations. The upp er portions of the niches constric-
ws a neck-like
ed the firs t restoration. The wall sho
large bricks; this con sti tut al pattern, an
sim ple orn ame nts of compressed pilasters, flor
tion toward the top, wit h ing of the sixth
the se ind ica te a dat e not earlier than the beginn
stylised candrasalika; an entrance pierce
ple was blo cked on the north and
century. At a later point,
the tem indicate
ess to its wel l-l ike inte rior. Concrete pavements
acc struc-
through the wall to give ument was later surrou
nded by a large oblong
floo r leve ls. The mon rec ent res tor ation
successive The most
che d on the n ort h by an imposing stairway.
ture approa c with the original temple
.
was a circul ar construction concentri
104
Magadha style, II-A.1.
The stucco fj
formed by a war
delicate modelling, tend with classical quality (Plate 221). Their
mukuta worn by Visnu is uliar to the eastern
assignable to c. a. al so ch ay ats
p. 5 00. ar ac te ri st ic. The temple iis
ce of naga images ind
ica
hich di
The next addition was a sandstone védika around the Bédhighara built by donors,
among whom were Arya Kuramgi and Nagadévi, wives of kings Indragnimitra and
Brahmamitra. From the style of the bas-reliefs and the paleography of the inscriptions,
the railing seems assignable to c. 75-50 B.c.
n of
As Mahayana Buddhism ushered in worship of Buddhist icons and a pantheo
the modest
Buddhist divinities, with accompanying greater complexities in ritual,
no longer satisfy devotees . To this older struc-
Bodhighara or Vajrasana shrine could
the fourth century A.D.
ture, a large temple adorned with images was added by at least
that the foot of the Bodhi tree was
Fa-hsien, who visited Gaya in c. a.D. 410, reported
of Buddha’s birth, first
one of the four holiest spots of Buddhism (others being the sites
placed. A well-known
sermon, and nirvana) where towers had been raised and images
a and dated in the year
Buddha image made of Mathura sandstone found from Bédhgay to
on the grounds of style) is likely
64 (most often equated to Gupta era 64/a.p. 384
was in existence at the site of the
have adorned a local shrine. That a grand temple
ana anaaaaaaean4
GUAR ACS ORCA(antnaaaanaae
— =
SSeS anoaaaanar..22222—-—
iS SeSsee
dO) = =e SS
2 Sa 6 et Se =e |||
HF | 2 a
N; = | Sse FH FY ata wv E> ‘ } al
a? ed
eo ||
HI
naA y es er
Ni:
OOLSDOS SOSOstDEOSOSOH
5
2ZB st: s
tL =
sen) MS : lh en
aT
Pail sz
3} =
PIA t
2}
4 OW
;SS i b—)
ips
Hl pea YY
BI Tbe
KEY bie
KX ==
|
=a
ae
EP
FIG
9}
(a)
Vy\
VN a
ial
re ellie
or
&raat
IS
XS
>o
YB
ence
Irs
eS
mae
dah Pp PF.
Ka
aaa
Fig. 43. Bddhgaya.
oes SN na” A
“Carae
: 42. chri , dooriframe.
= aya.=“ “Ratnaghar » shrine ram
Fig. Bodhg
pillar.
106
Magadha style, II.A.1.
(aa /
Doss VS
) x7
Ul
Na (eosin
MY
~
SFP
™ A A)
TONS c3
( wi
Va Nyy
“N Pad)
iSIN
Nie
yh SETI
Sony ear
Nis
s)
a) |
v {AICS |
HOTT rte
COMTI rr trata
ad
= EET |ssse=e i
WITTeT Tr
z TIT]
J eM Too
» XY) Com |e
mar|ea
Ot 0Bal
ES y-98 [TTT
rie ee eT TL
COO
a it
TT a7
ss
Fig.44. Kumrahar. Inscribed ter
racotta plaque, relief
c. second-third cen tepresenting a Buddhi
tury a.p. st temple,
Vajrasana (Vajra
sana-
prasada received
gra
LATER GUPTAS AND MINOR DYNASTIES 107
manda by a Ceylonese monk Mahanaman, who belonged to the royal family. These
references prove that the Vajrasana temple by the fifth and sixth centuries was a much
larger structure than the original Asoka-period shrine and that it was surrounded by
other shrines embellished with images.
process, even
That addition and modification at this sacred site was a continuous
be inferre d from a terracot ta plaque from
during the second and third centuries, may
the second or third century a.D.
Kumrahar that bears a short Kharésthi inscription of
g an image and agrees
(Fig. 44). It shows a temple with a tall pyramidal sikhara housin
Hsiian Tsang. The
in many details with the account of the Mahabodhi temple given by
, pillars, and arched dor-
facade of this temple shows storeys with enclosing railings
reliefs and in Buddhist cave-
mers similar to forms of architecture seen in Safici
Ghats. The seventh-century shrine
temples of the first centuries A.D. in the Western
formula, but with some significant
modelled itself on this second-third century
and a centralised band of candra-
changes, particularly the addition of karnandakas
Salas.
three restorations, one of which was
The Vajrasana itself underwent at least
which the stucco figures of yaksas and lions
effected during the early Gupta period (to
;
seen in early photographs belong).
the orig inal sandstone védika was found
As the temple complex expanded, ured
ite pillars. The original enclosure meas
inadequate and was enlarged using gran t 64 posts; the extended védika mea-
rised abou
c. 250 ft. in circumference and comp s show
posts , of which c. 100 survive. The granite post
sured c. 520 ft. It had c. 108 tails , hum an head s wear-
a, hamsa with scrolled
typical early Gupta motifs: grasamukh g the stor y of the
and even a narrative panel depictin
ing Gupta coiffure, vidyadharas,
at Nalanda, temple no. 2).
loquacious tortoise (also found Cunning-
exis ting tem ple repr esen ts a restoration carried out by Alexander
The e brick-and-stucco
n of several restorations. This larg
ham in 1880, and the last of a chai ara, 160 ft. high, now
ight-edged, pyramidal sikh
edifice consists of a central, stra ers of an extensive rec-
t subsidiary shrines at the corn
restored, and three newly buil tree (Plates 224-225).
terr ace (88 x 76 ft.) buil t to the east of the present Bodhi
tang ular amalakas) embel-
ara is seve n-st orey ed (each storey indicated by bhimi-
The mai n gikh on a bold védiban-
niches framed by pilasters. Rising
lished with bold candrasalas and is deco rate d with a broad
kalaéa, and pattika, the jagati
dha composed of kumbha, a runnin band of bold
g
scu lpt ure d arcu ate niches framed by pilasters,
regi ster of ng Buddhist
chains, a regi ster of large candrasalas containi
grasamukhas spewing pearl med
angu lar and circ ular nich es, and a crowning band of pilaster-fra
images in rect
:
shallow niches (Plate 223).r and is connected
Internally, the garbhag ha is two-storeyed, wit h a vaulted roof,
an alinda and mukha-
thickness of the garbhabhitti to
by a narrow passage through the 47 ft. 3
The garbhagrha measures 48 ft. 8 in. X
mandapa, both also with vaulted roofs. Pala-period image of
external ly and 20 ft. 4 in. x 13 ft. internally and enshrines a
in.
. iy ‘i :
the Buddha placed on a basalt pedestal answers to the descript ion of Hstian Tsang not only in
The temple as it now exists deco ve features. The agreemereeme nt is
but als o in lay out , des ign , and decorati
height and extent o shows that in spite of
nti ty of the two is beyond question. It als
tha t the ide the temple has
le alterations the basic form of
so clo se
tor ati ons and som e una voi dab
faulty res :
A.D. 637. Hsiian Tsang wrote that
remained unchanged since ©. ara (temple) abo ut 160 or 170 feet high. Its
Bod hi- tre e ther e is a vyih tiles
To the east of the face. The building is of blue
more paces in its
lower foundation-wall is 20 or
108
Magadha style, II.A.1.
is DS i RA
Lied
OOFeesTI
best best Fees test esi
x G Sa
¥
CLAIR E
Bat eR TR Ty at eT
13%, Ww) 1 2
3 4 |
2 e
1 s
F. 9es
Fig. 46. Nalanda. Stone temple no. 2, moulded
od jagati with niche.
i 45.
Fig. Nalanda. Site no. 3, votive stipa near fifth-peri
temple, plan.
F. [LO
a ha and
a. first terrace, véediband
Fig. 47. Aphsad. Visnu temple: iba ndh a.
terrace, ved
ris, pilaster; b. second
110 A.1.
Magadha style, II.
at a later period.
to an uneven height. é Above this, a plain brick wall was reconstructed
kumbha,
r kharasila and comprises khura-
eer ee rae the Heer ove rven ing recess
ae tta, a pair of apotapali cornices with a brief inte
(Fie. 46 aining a large
). The broa d anta rapa tta 1s carved with plain sunk niches cont
8 (Plates 235-240). Both kapotapalis
are
ornaments
variety of figures and decorative tapali is
geese or suparnas. The upper kapo
ee ea with candrasalikas flanked by jaga ti wall s have
by incipient éiirasénakas. The
ecorated where the jagati projects The east
ecti ons, four on the karn as and pratikarnas, three on the bhadras. ana).
short proj ht of steps (sop
ons, three to either side of a flig
wall (Plate 234) has six projecti on a jagat After the stone struc-
l.
temple was set
Like other Nalanda temples, this rebu ilt, reconstructed partly with
old
ain s were subs eque ntly
ture fell down, its rem of the surviving
part ly with new bri ckw ork (Plate 233). An examination
pieces and ing 52 ft. square, 18 ft.
the ston e temp le had a garbhagrha measur
remains indi cate s that oblong passage to
gar bha grh a seem s to have been connected through an and
internally. The apa. The mukhamandapa
a mandapa (30 x 25 ft.) preceded by a small mukhamand of the jagati, which provides a
sopana together project about 17 ft. from the east wall
space c. 22 ft. wide for pradaksina. e tem-
not only of the original ston
The superstructure has completely collapsed, temple choked
found the
with an
also of the late r reconstruction. Excavators are now stacked
ple but
tura l mem bers, most of which
enormous mass of fall
en arch itec t the stone
. An exa min ati on of these leaves no doubt tha
around the temple precin
cts bold candrasalikas and
a, wit h a mad hyalata made up of loose at the site
A large amalasaraka lying
ha gik har
temple had a rék
bhami-amalakas.
with karnas marked by ng member.
he crowni c. 220
was embellished with
ti (Fig. 46; Plate 234) frame d by Ruca ka pilas-
(Plates 235-236) are l
d with a short octa na
go
on
rani. The ghatapallava pa dmalata. The pilas-
section below the bha a conical design of
mounted by an ardhapad flanked by floriate
ters carry a cruciform Sirsa
et is adorne
palmettes; sometimes the b rack th a usua
ngular in shape, wi
kumaras. The niches are rec ta mental border.
osed by an orna ds and goddesses, vidyadharas,
rectilinear top, and are mostly encl g°
th em es de pi ct ed in the niches comprise yana, miscellaneou
s secu-
The rnas, sc en es fr om th e Ra ma
etics,
a and supa acrobats, asc
gandharvas, a kinmar les , co ck -f ig ht , mu sicians and dancers, ds and god-
lar subjects like anim
al fab
an d ch il d, an d am at ory couples. Among go features)
mother mple iconographic
teacher and disciple, ms and showing si
nt ed wi th tw o- ar (Plate 239), and
desses (represe Ku be ra , Ba la ra ma , Karttikéya, Agni
mi (Plate 235),
are Siva, Gajalaks
Rama is marked by his
probably Hariti. om th e Ra mayana; in thr ee, a
Five panels represen t sc en es fr row. One portrays Ravana as
ornamentand by his bow and ar eateningly to-
distinctive channavira re ho ld in g va ri ous weapons, rushing thr
aded fi gu desses have
six-armed, three-he in fr ig ht an d gri ef. While all gods an d god
rning aw ay aded, perhaps
wards Sita who is tu ns , Ra va na is mu lti-armed and mult -he
i
rmal huma
been treated as if no rogance.
ou t hi s su pe rhuman prowess and ar ry of the loquacious
to br in g
les ca rv ed her e, one represents the sto lion. Semi-
Of two animal fab
ki nd -h ea rt ed rat helping the ungrateful
tortoise; the other represen ts t he ular themes of
ad ha ra s (P la te 24 0) and gandharvas an d sec
divine figures of flying vidy
A.1.
Magadha style, I1.
are
bhadrapitha does no t survive. There ck
Se The sanctum placed atop the highest som e fra gme nts of bla
aa remains of brick foundations and pavements and and their
representing Surya, Visnu,
asalt sculptures of c. the seventh century
attendants.
a kalaga and kapotapali with a vrttakarna beneath.
ae He védibandha shows only ed, concealing lower
appears to have been rais
erie level of this bhadrapitha or arcuate
h rectangular
s 245 -24 6). The jangha above has niches wit estal
e resting on a stylised lotus ped
ate Th e (Pl ate
sters have a simple ghata bas
the framing pila the ed in
, ps.
a arch itec ture . Abo ve are a square section embellish
ypical of early Mag adh n and partly
hap adm a, an oct agonal section partly plai
square section carved with
e ard
upper part with a larg hap adm as, a sho rt
smalle r ard bharana, a short
decorated with a row of wit h lot us petals that constitute the
patravalli, a gha ta emb ell ish ed rced by a pair of
orm bra cke t. The brackets, reinfo
pla in cru cif eze of tula-
square abacus, and a
nic he, sup por t a pla in beam surmounted by a fri
h
ardhapadmas above eac not been exposed.
me mb er s of the jangha have se of the Mundésvari
ends. Th e up pe r
mo ul di ng s of thi s temple compare with tho design with
us pedestals share a basic
The védiband ha
pil ast ers res tin g on lot
ornate stucco
temple (c. a.p. 636). The sit e no. 3 and even more sO with the
at Nala nd a na-panels are
the fifth-period temple ive stupa to its north. Figures in the Ramaya nances
pilasters of the large vot a den se gro upi ng (Pl ate 246). Their counte
seas of tall build, and
show Gobind Bhita, Mahasthan
ter rac ott a figures from Bhitarganv and
ear res emb lan ce to racotta tradition, stone
the stu cco fig ure s, which follow a ter nu from Aphsad
(Bangladesh). Unlike elo ped . Th e crowned image of Vis
em mo re dev ised by taut
images from the site se res ent ati ve of its time and is character
y) is rep abstraction.
(c. mid-seventh centur a dig nif ied exp res sion free from spiritual
face wit h ery” effect of
modelling and an oval be few and rigorously selective; the “wet-drap the lower
Ornaments continue to at Raj gir and Na la nd a has been eliminated and
rent
Sarnath that is still appa
ht and volume.
garment exerts its own weig of Adi tya sen
4 genealogy
a found at Aphsad givesa foundation
pti on
The undated stone ins
cri decessors. It is
tor y of the kin g and his dynastic pre Visnu by Adityaséna, for a
and a detailed his in honour of
cellent temple” built cavated by
inscription for the “ex de vi Sr im at i, an d for a large tan k ex
by his mother Ma ha but there should be
matha constructed e matha and tank,
ents the
his queen Konadévi
. It is dif
" nels repres
exp os te mp later part
no doubt that the partly
k
ed br ic
for Adi tya sen a, falling toward the
date, A.D. 672, is kn
own dicate a
Visnu temple. One ra l sty le of the te mple would also in
ulptural and architectu
of his reign. The sc rter of the seventh century.
date in the third qua
Krishna Deva
REFERENCES
1980.
Eastern India, 300-800, Minneapolis
Frederick M. Asher, Art of 1934. Brussels 1935.
Buddha Gaya, Calcutta a, XVIII), Paris and
B.M. Barua, Gaya and (Ars Asiatic 1892.
AK. Coomaraswamy, La Sculpture de Bodhgaya gaya, Lo nd on
or the Great Buddhist Temple at Bodh y of Ori ent al Art, New Series
A. Cunningham, Mahabodhi of the Indian Societ
No. 2 at Nalanda,” Journal
Krishna Deva, “Stone Temple
XI (1980), 80-84.
1971.
A. Ghosh, Nalanda, New Delhi
114 IL.A.1.
Magadha style,
Historical Introduction
ng with the Later
who rose to real prominence alo
aa pee nae an ancient clan sixth century.
hyadééa and Ma gadha late in the
p a in contiguous regions of Mad s at Barabar,
are kno wn from inscriptions in the cave
Siciict ees e chie fs , and
of images of Krs na, Siva-Parvati sixth
e reco rd the dedi cati on
ee We ya; thes half of the
ma some time during the later
yayani by the Maukhari Anantavar
century. The family had only local significance.
as The main Maukhari family, known from sea
ls and inscriptions, rose in Madhya-
adha and gained considerable
&éa almost simultaneous with the Later Guptas of Mag a was
akubja (present Kanauj ). Isanavarm
power and prestige; their capital was Kany against the
ruler to decla re his indep enden ce an d to lead victorious ar mies
ce first Poised in
and Gauda s as claim ed in his inscription of A.D _ 554. Gup-
Store Silikas, Maukharis an d the Later
ha and Madhyadésa, the
te ee territories of Magad war through several genera
tions.
ound to clash and they, in fact, remained at res ult ed in
ieee: Kumaragupta,
s strug gle agains t his Later Gupta contemporary, a not only
varm
pote ap
fitur e, a fact aveng ed by his son Sarvavarma. Sarva adv ers ary ’s
ae iscom but occupied a part 0 f his
pta 5 son Daméd aragu pta con fir med
omen e Kumaragu son Avantivarma re-
bad, where he and his
ory, now in District Shaha
a her edi tar y Saura priest cal led Varunavas! i. Sarvavarma
an old land gra nt in fav our of dhakari Siva in
er, Sury avar ma, who rec ons tructed a temple of An Avanti-
had an elder broth arma was succeed ed by
eased his father). Sarvav
A.D. 554 (he probably predec son Gra havarma accor ding to
the Harsacarita.
cee ded by his pta, a king
varma, who was suc sist er, and was later kille d by Dévagu
yas ri, Har sa’ s culminating
Grahavarma married Raj s m urd er led to a chain 0 f events
d Rajy asri . Thi j of Harsa-
of Malava, who imprisone Var dha nas and the transfer to Kanau
the
in the union of the Maukhari is and
sial
vardhana’s capital. one of the mos t r omantic and controver
. 600 -63 6),
Saéanka of Gauda (c. A.D a sig nificant role in a political
dram a enacted about
his tor y, pla yed vardhana a nd the
figures of Indian adv ant age of the dea th of Prabhakara
Ap. 606 in Kanauj . Tak ing er Guptas, joined
Gup tas and Mau kha ris , he side d with the Lat and then
enmity of the Later ava , and fou ght an d killed Grahavarma
kin g of Mal in Gauda, he
hands with Dévagupta, yav ard han a. Ris ing to power rapidly
ther, Raj
Harsa’s own elder bro
11.A.2.
116 Madhyadésa style.
A. Yajfiavarma
Sardilavarma
Naravardhana
Anantavarma
B. Harivarma
Rajyavardhana
Adityavarma
Isanavarma
(c. A.D. 550-576) Adityavardhana
Sarvavarma
(c. A.D. 576-580)
Avantivarma
(c. A.p, 580-600) Prabhakaravardhana
(c. A.D. 580-605)
Grahavarma
{c. A.D, 608)
Rajyavardhana Harsavardhana
(A.D. 606)
(A.D. 606-647)
MA UKHARIS AND U
PUSPABHUTIS OF KANYAKUBJA be
Architectural Features
parallel to Magadha in the development of brick
moved seems to have been
Madhyadééa in this period stone architecture, however,
architecture. The development of the Mundésvarl temple
hya dég a. Thi s becomes clear if we compare
fast er in Mad The former shows
h tem ple no. 2 at Nalanda (c. A.D. 650).
(dated c. a.p. 636 ) wit mouldings, tall
wit h bol d and crisply carved yédibandha
confident workmansh ip crowned by
s, and a jan gha ado rned with bold niches
pillars, expansive doorfr
ame le executed in stone,
nas. The Nalanda temple, whi
Pharmsana roofs with sirmhakar ldings and even shal-
cei ved in ter ms of brick. It shows shallow mou
actual ly was con of execution and its
car vin gs. Its arc hit ectural members lack boldness
lower dec ora tiv e jagati are halting
dep th and defi niti on. The projections of its
oid of e with
ornaments are dev
sug ges tin g that the Mag adh a architect was not yet at hom
and bereft of strength,
the medium of stone. of the Madhya-
g se venth-century stone temple
Mundéévari is the only survivin ment ©
p les in India to displa ya full comple
dééa style and is one of the earliest tema, kumbha, kalaga, and kapotapali. It substi-
ngs: khur
developed védibandha mouldi both of Magadha and
for kala Sa on bha dra projections. (Brick temples ta-
tutes tulapith a
jangha can provide a represen
tulapitha to kalaéa.) Its
Madhyadééa often preferred t earl y in the seventh century. Plain
masonry
and emb ell ish men orna-
tive picture of design -roo f ped ime nt fronted by a large udgama
d by a pent
walls have niches crowne Mundéésvari temple had
piec es lyin g at the site suggest that the
ment. The arch itec tura l a vertical row of candragalas
hya lat a of kapotas adorned by
a Nagara sikh ara with a mad flat, squarish bhimi-
half cand raéa las. The karnas were articulated by
flanked by
crowned by a large amalasaraka.
amalakas, while the sikhara was ive of a regional style, we
can conclude
tem ple is repr esen tat
If the Mundaévar i i onal; mithu-
form at com mon to Gup ta doo rframes had become opt
that the “T”-shaped
also h ave not been used.
nas, stambhasakha, and lalatabimba
1.A.2.
118 Madhyadééa style,
Bold védibandha mouldings (Fig. 49a) rise directly from a kharasil Zam
a and comprisise
khura, kumbha, kalaéga, and a kap Otapali with two minor karna mouldings below oe
upper decorated with amralumbi). These mouldings are interrupted by aes een
the cardinal faces (Plate 247) and are confined to the bhadra-projections on the
:
fa ces, where kalaéa is replaced by tulapitha bosses (Fig. ‘ 49b). To eithe : r ee i the
oie.
bhadra-projections, in place of these véedibandha mouldings, is a broad kum
demarcated from the plane of the jangha and ornamented with : a vandanamiali alika
suspended from a gor geous Sobhapattika in alignment with
the kalasa moulding (Plate
248).
The jangha is decorated on vikarna faces with three niches; the smaller meer
niches are crowned by bold udgamas terminating in sirnhakarnas. The
central bha 2
niche is larger and its crowning pediment must have extended into the superstructur :
The flanking niches rise from a short kapotapali that rests on
a tulapitha of four bosse
(Plate 250); these are sometimes left plain and sometimes
ornamented with ee
heads or grasamukhas. These niches are framed by two
sakhas, the first carved a
patravalli, the second a stambhagakha of Rucaka type, with
square kumbhika and a
cruciform sirsaka, both decorated with ardharatna
shaft is ornamented only on the
flanked by floriate palmettes. The
upper ha lf, showing ardharatnas on the madhya-
bandha, ardhapadma on the short octagonal
section, and
ana. The brackets support a single kapétapali ornamenteda ghatapallava on the bhar-
with two candraéalikas.
Above, on the face of the Phamsana pediment, isa
large udgama with simhakarna. The
ornament of the larger central niches is generally
similar to that of the flanking ones.
The pilasters show ghatapallava at the kumbhika and a
chain-and-bell suspended from
a manibandha or grasamukha. The niches are carved with
three sakhas. Their archi-
{rave is ornamented with a bevelled course of
lotus petals surmounted by a beam
ornamented with ardharatnas.
The doorways have three Sakhas, of which the middl
e one on the south is deco-
rated with ganas (Plate 249). The figure
at the top of the right jamb holds a
(Pingala); the bearded figure on the left carrie sword
s a staff (Dandi). The lintel shows eight
vidyadharas; the two central ones hold a short
kiritamukuta. The prominence of this
kiritamukuta suggests a Vaisnava or Saura
association. The bases of the jambs have
large two-a rmed pratiharas in tribhanga who carry a lotus flower and have
attendant. an
All four doorways show padmalata on the inner sakha and a flori
design on the outer (Plates 249, 251, ate palmette
253). The western doorway shows a
lotus vine issuing from luxurious
a purnaghata on the middle sakha. The
pratiharas of the west
MAUKHARIS AND PUSPABHUTIS OF KANYAKUBJA 119
doorway are two-armed. That on the left carries trigala (its upper part mutilated); that
on the right is attended by trisilapurusa. Trigilapurusa coupled with the depiction of
a naga rearing up from the shoulder of both pratiharas indicates a Saiva affiliation. (A
pillar bearing a figure of standing Surya flanked by Dandi and Pingala was used to
prop up this doorway at a later date.)
The north doorway is embellished with patralata on the middle sakha and is
exceptional in showing four-armed female pratiharis carrying swords. These pratiharis
are of Sakta affiliation, appropriate to a northern orientation.
The east doorway resembles the north one but shows Ganga and Yamuna at the
base. This doorway was blocked, perhaps at a later date, using an ancient jalavatayana
and two other architectural members, one of them fitted in upside down. The jala-
vatayana (Plate 253) is noteworthy for introducing a frieze of ratnas and also a grinning
grasamukha with ring in his mouth as if it were a door-handle. This door is the only
one with its architrave intact (Plate 252). It shows three ornate registers, the lowest
carved with lotus petals and a garland pattern, the middle with a course of tula-ends
ornamented with six simhavaktras, and the top with patralata.
The upper part of the jangha as well as the Sikhara are missing. The existing
ceiling and concrete roof are modern. The temple had some sort of rékha sikhara with
madhyalata made up of bold candragalas addorsed to kap6tas and with karnas marked
by bhimi-amalakas (Plates 257-258). This is indicated by the numerous architectural
pieces scattered at the site. The site has yielded half a dozen candraégalas inset with
figures of Saiva divinities which possibly adorned the base of the sikhara (Plate 254).
benign and
There are two figures of Karttikéya (Plate 256), one Siva Andhakantaka,
terrifying heads of Siva, and a mutilated image of Ganééa.
of pilasters.
The interior of the temple shows four central pillars and four pairs
shaft, short
The pillars are plain with a square kumbhika and bharana, an octagonal curved
sirgaka with a plain
46-sided section below the bharana, and a cruciform short octagonal section,
profile. The pilasters are Rucaka with a plain half medallion, s a catur-
pithika support
and a plain ghatapallava marking the bharana. A central
al worship today, however, appropriate to
mukha Sivalinga of c. 13th century. Princip
image of an eight-armed
the present name, “Mundéévari,” is offered to a medieval
oddess riding a bull (buffai lo?), thatRN.is kept in the east entry. a pillared mandapa in
8 Martin in 1838 shows ith
The sketch-plan publi shed by R. nt
doorway having 12 pillars. To the southwest of the prese
of
that contains a Sivalinga. The mouldings
Hi ie eo are a tiny later shrine asoe a
foundation for the southern ayer
Lpinlees TAREE the surviving
oe an Ee
Nearwith
the temple eycarved hae VER T
architectural members lying loose aroundRucak a pillar s
iit
11 ft. high; these are plain
octagonal section on the bharana. These need no
fas aes medallion and a shortsj iption.
be of the same date as eee or aah fragments at the site are a worn
s (one Oe
ere ce oe pillars with sarvatobhadrika pratimas in niche as, gnitap
OE a Meer) Ae d Ganééa, the other Surya, Harihara, Parvati in pafica
"flat ceiling carved with a large lotus, and a corner
Sirya, Visnu, Parvati, an and Kubér a (two of the
and Ganééa), two pieces ofconta a flat enefigures of Yama
ng niches ining
fragment showi
636, the
Lokapalas).
ite
ers o the Ha rs a era , yielding a date of a.p.
on ref ptiion record that
rdss Me
If the foundation inscripti t e periiod . The ini scriipt
be assigned to alésvarasvami,
temple stylistically can na (N ar D
ay a
an adeév akula), ca led Mand
Nar aya
there was a temple of
IL.A.2.
120 Madhyadésa style,
which was an old establishment with a management committee Car avanika telend
storeroom késthika), to which was appended a Siva temple and monastery (Vint
ramatha) in the year 30; whether Narayana here refers to Visnu is not
clear.
An analysis of the octagonal plan of this temple by Meister recently has demon-
strated that its architects used both the grid of the Vastu
mandala and the geometry of
the Sulba Satras in its construction, While the large bhadra
niches on the vikarna faces
must have enclosed images of major deities, the flanking
smaller niches may
contained an early set of the Dikpalas acting as guardians of the eight directwell have
ions. The
Patna Museum preserves images from this site that includ
e Surya, Harihara (bearing 3
short label reading “Vipascitah” in the same characters as the
foundation inscription),
seated Karttikéya, standing Karttikéya, standing Parvat
i, two seated Matrkas, seated
Agni, and seated Kubéra, all stylistically of the
early seventh century
Sculpture associated with this temple is not of uniform quality A.D.
and seems to
betray several idioms and levels of workmanship. Decorative orname
nt — scrolls and
arabesques, grasakinkinika, lion heads on the
architraves — reveals crisp and confi-
dent carving and fine workmanship, inspired in part by the Gupta idiom
of Sarnath.
Larger figures from the site are generally clumsy. The image
of Surya, on the prop fixed
to the western doorway, and the left pratihara
carved on the same doorframe are
| MAUKHARIS AND PUSPABHUTIS OF KANYAKUBJA 121
exceptions. Architecture seems to have been handled by a guild trained perhaps in the
;
trained,
Sarnath school while images were sculpted by local guilds, some of them
perhaps, in a wooden tradition.
two such
| The rocky ascent up the hill shows many later pilgrim-records and
in characters of
| records are also engraved on the védibandha of the main temple
“shell” script also is
the late seventh century. The number of inscriptions here in
remarkable.
the kumbhika and a plain shaft with square and octagonal ene
: mple se
Pe eet: is
essentially a square edifice, 68 ft. on a side, with prominent pa a Paes teats
three sides containing each a small shrine with doorway. The embelli
temple conforms to a pattern shared by almost all brick
. temples in
: thisi period
iod includ-
ing that at Aphsad and temple no. 12 at Nalanda.
Sarnath and Varanasi, architectural fragments (Plates e 6
259, 261-263, 266)
Numerous stone architectural fragments including doorframes, =
ara ee 7
e
Ss,
(»
MAUKHARIS AND PUSPABHUTIS OF KANYAKUBJA
123
Buxar, District Shahabad, Bihar, is an ancient site situated on the right bank of the
Ganga, about 60 miles east of Varanasi. The site has yielded a doorframe (Plate 265) of
Vindhya sandstone composed of four éakhas, of which the first is carved with a
kalpavalli that issues from the navels of two yaksas and entwines jambhakas; the
rosettes; the third is a
second sakha shows manibandha of diamonds alternating with at the
stambhasakha with square, octagonal, and 16-sided sections with ghatapallava
of floral pattern surmounted by
base, grasamukha on a clasp in the middle, and a band
is also embellished with a band
ardhapadma in the upper part. The octagonal section
the upper part of the stambhasakha is
of floral pattern capped by three ardhapadmas;
Srivrksa motif. Ganga and Yamuna
mutilated. The fourth sakha is carved with stylised
doorframe in exaggerated tribhanga with
(Plate 264) are depicted at the base of the
on one side by a malavidyadhara ensconced
usual attendants and vahanas and flanked Yamuna. The modelling and
fly toward
in clouds. A pair of harnsas, carrying a garland,
headdre ss, and the stylised srivrksa motif indicate
stance of the river-goddesses, their
a date of c. a.p. 675-700. Krishna Deva
REFERENCES
rr
124
aN Padhavali
adhavali ounp aa
Le,
=}
Batésara RAL_A
. gl ml
GWALIOR®
SHIVPURI
©
&
: Fe ®CHATARPUR wy,
GUNA TIKAMGARH (
® /
how
6
}
DEVGADH* ©
Chaparahy
Payhart a Ramgadh
Se SS
Badoh
A Phase I
Gyaraspur
® wz 4& Phase Il
VIDISA
JABALPUR
i aneat
Historical Introduction
“sakalot-
647) wie lde d imp eri al authority, and was called
Harsavardhana (A.D. 606- s of his
of the who le of Nor th India”) even in the record
tarapathanatha” (“emperor itical confusion. With
of Bada mi. His death was followed by pol g
enemies, the Calu kyas
apparent, Nort h India
relapsed into petty warrin
heir or succ esso r state . Pro min ent
no strong narrow dominions
not extend beyond their
kingdoms whose writ did of Mag adha under the Later Gup
tas, Kashmir
the kin gdo ms the Maitrakas,
among them remained er the Sai lod bhavas, Valabhi under
Ori ssa und , Mauryas,
under the Karkétakas,
ast han and Guj ara t und er the Gurjara-Pratiharas
Raj principal administrative
and Malava and parts of as. Madhyadésa, with its
Guhilaputras, Ca ha ma na s, and Cap had no stable ruling
and the spr awl ing reg ion of Central India both in their
centre at Kanauj, pped up in those region
s were very limited
powers. The minor
states that cro listing five gen-
isd ict ion . As exa mple, a local dynasty
political and administr
ative jur on on the Siva
Vat sar aja is men tioned in an inscripti
erations of chiefs end
ing wit h ned in the
vpu ri, Ma dh ya Pradesh. Kings mentio
a, District Shi and
temple no. 1 at Mahu Tajovardhana, Udita,
rahéla), Nagavardhana,
asa (Vyagh
inscription are Aryabh tral India during the
fam ily , so typ ica l of those ruling in Cen
Vatsaraja. This entire torical source.
are not kn own from any other his th of Harsa-
seventh cen tur y,
e co nt in ue d unchanged after the dea
tural cli mat fined to a
The religious and cul ent an d Bu dd hi sm was declining, con ic
a worshipped in anicon
was on the asc
vardhana. Hinduism wi de sp re ad , wit h Siv
Saivism was temples in this period
few centres like Safici; By far the largest number of
form more than in vig
rah a for ms. popular adoration
wo rs hi p; oth er div inities also to receive , and Kart-
va
was dedicated to Sai ra ma rd in i, Sa pt am atrkas, Sarasvati, GanéSa
hisa su Bhivaraha,
were Visnu, Surya, Ma as Va su dé va in cat urbhuja form but also as
not onl y of these di-
tikéya. Visnu appears yl. A roc k-c ut representation of most
a, and Sés asa alence of
Trivikrama, Narasimh ad h, Dis tri ct Vid ish a, attesting to the prev
pears at Ramg
vinities at one site ap
seventh-century India. of Ganééa, Mahisasura-
paficadévopasana in ref lec ted by the images
The same catholic
att itu de is
temple no. 1a t Mahua,
dedicated to
bh ad ra nic hes on
a in the image of
mardini, and Bhivarah h, wh ic h is de di ca te d to 5 iva, also preserves an
mgad
Siva. Shrine no. 1 at Ra
in i in its surviving bhadra niche.
Mahisasuramard
126 11.B.1.
Dagarnadééa style, phase 1,
Architectural Features
The artistic momentum created by Gupta patr , North Indiaia did
onage in di not fully fully wear
out until c. a.D. 700. The seven th cen ae een
tury a.p. marked a period of Pe e a edieca
what may be perceived as a lingering “class r
icism” and certain abit fealled
tendencies in Central Ind
ia. In architecture, sma
“sila-mandapika” in the ll flat-roofed ‘ ae and
Mahua prag-
gtiva, were erected in considerainscription) comprising a square eu f iti
ble numbers, as well as fully def tna
structures. Pillar-types, doo ine Be tnNag d,
ara
rframes, and kati all reflec
t designs
with a series of pillars witHew
Mandapika shrines show a kati it lahe-wet bes
tween, a form that seems h stone s ee ddecat
derived from timber originals
simple posts with planks (where ger bi Liasco
or mt
triratha plan, with niches cro lattices between). Often these shrines me
wned by simple sirnhakarna bhadras.
These shrines are modest pediments on way (with
thin slab walls), and seem to in dimensions, constructed in a distinctive
reflect a local tradition, separa formulas
and evolving side by side. This
mandapika tradition evolves ove
te from Geet as eae
interacting at times with r culate pee eae
Nagara
stream of Nagara architecture. Th formulas, ‘ but sur viving independent o
e Mahua inscriae ption, which records tha t a temple,
dedicated to Siva, was
Parents, suggests that the
set up “for the increa
se of the religious merit”sss ing’s
tradition may represent of the king
The mandapika at Chapar a memorial type.
a ha s ‘ yout
each side with three an ab so lu te ly ba re kat i
plain slabs between. sh owing sii ete Aa
arrangement of pilasters Mahua Siva temple a
and slab-recesses but is no. 1 eee ur shrine
no. 1 is a more ornate version highly ornamented. Gy
Projecting bhadras (actin
of the Ma hu a ma nd ap
aras
ika, which displays aesp icuously
g perhaps as open balc
onies)
nati
Ramgadh has only slab wall
s with no pilasters or rece.ss The mandapika temp hee with
crow ning simhakarnas, es but wi
th bhadra nic
The temple at Kuchdon
Nagara formula of karna, Pranear Devgadh compresses mandapika walls e
Tecess
tiratha, and bhadra, with
orname
to se
between kar na and pr nt ed slabs for
atiratha only; on the slab ro ;
Sarvat6bhadra Naga
ra shrine with Lati of ab ov e is set oo,enpa
tire
se
sites as Padhavali and Batésa na éi kh ara.
ra also sometimes shLaow ter mandapika shri
eresik
Latina ne
i ted above
mandapika walls. haras fit
emple is dvi-anga
bhadras. Its elevat; on plan, with
i
MINOR D YNASTIES: p MANDAPIKAA AND EARLY NAGARA TRADITIONS
127
that it
at ier cs # a en aea value Siva temple no. 2 by Meister show
Vastumanda!a grid of 64 squares, as prescr ibed in the sixth-
_a
form the sanct um; the Sait
ates, Brhat Samhita. The central 4 x 4 squares level of
is two squares; the first
sae ae measured on the exterior by the karnas,
athas, measures the width of the inner
a ‘3ee on the outer wall, forming the pratir or
tion, forming the bhadra, measures the interi
ctum; the final level of projec
Brahmasthana.
shrines (as at Chapara and Ramgadh) omit
ie véedibandhas of earlier mandapika at
(this feature is also shared by shrines
oF a, having instead a broad antarapatta mandapika
temples of Dasarnadésa, including
akanganj in Uparamala). Later mouldings, though often they Teplace
shrines, display fully developed vedibandha
kalaga with tulapitha on the bhadra. with
have suggested that all temples surviving
i Some scholars (Viennot, Tartakov) had either a cubical
as mandapika shrines)
at roofs (those of the Gupta period as well at Nacna, or had some form
of the Parvati temple
cell above, as seen in old photographs Kuraiya Bir
éikhara, as does the upper storey of the eighth-century of
of curvilinear
This does not properly take into account either the presence
temple at Kuchdon. of the flat roofs of Gupta temples
(Safici no. 17,
drain-chutes cut into the top surface e roo fs are taken to have had
must be explained if thes
Tigawa, Kunda, Madhia), which superstructures.
her sup ers tru ctu re, or the vedi-formula of many mandapika and Pataini
any furt h as those at Batésara, Chandpur,
med iev al tem ple s, suc
Viennot mixes erstructures
of the Gup ta per iod , con tending that all lost their sup
Dévi, with temples drains
, dec ay, or acc ide nt, and Tartakov suggests that
due to fragile construct ion suggestion) but uses South
oth er cop ing to trap water (a defensible
require a véd ika or within a superstructure,
whi ch use chutes to drain water from
ta shr ine s, less plausible
Indian anarpi
insi st on the pre sen ce of ikharas in the North (a
as an example to
tween
argument).
co mp le xi ty of arc hit ectural development be
These suggestion s ignore the adh “Gupta” temple
early nin th century A.D. The Devg
the Gupta period and the by early in the sixth
ant ici pat ed mos t com pon ents of the Nagara gi khara ina structures con-
already had , and Lat
that “mundamala,” mandapika
century, a fact suggesting separate for ms, not part of a single line
ent h cen tur y rep res ent
temporaneous in the sev
m timber
of development.
in construction, with walls derived fro
Mandapika shrines,
modest tructures (as Meis-
type, and with simp le “vedi” supers century, though
prototypes of a post-and-plank to be built in Central India
into the ninth
di-
.ter calls them), continued Padhavali), in imitation o f the Nagara tra
shrines (Batésara, bas es. Suc h
some later mandapika offset Latina gikharas to their square mandapi ka
tion, do uncomfortably fit
at Devr! Kalan, suggested that
period.
complexities are common in this temple
the Madhia
Pramod Chandra, in publishing
tiers that acted as a link
between “flat-roofed”
shrines
s
it had a pyramidal
roof of two of thi s superstructure carrie
s. Meister’s analysis
and those with full-fledged sikhara
a
re fle ct, not a transition from
t Madhia seems “to
suggests tha adapt to stone a
more conviction. He m, but rat her a rudimentary attempt to
tow ere d for can be seen
flat-roofed to a in woo d; a conception which
ped for shr ine s l
conception already develo ed) in the fla t-r oof ed’ mandapika shrines of Centra
nsform in a mo dified form to roo
f
better adapted (and tra ole , and which is utilized
y te mp le s at Aih ogn iti on tha t
India, the clerestor his argume nt is a rec
as for Ma ha -M aru temples.” Central to part of the wall,
the ma nd ap
, rat her tha n bei ng par t of the superstruc ture, is
the first level at Madhia
I1.B.1.
Dagarnadééa style, phase 1,
aah
and
representing an incipient varandika, the complex cornice that tops the jangha
Only the upper level at Madhia —
separates it from the sikhara on later Nagara shrines.
a vedi platform with corners slightly articulated — can be called a superstr ucture.
Nanavati and Dhaky, in their discussion of Maitraka-period temples in Surastra,
suggest further evidence for the evolution of Nagara architecture in a series of seventh-
century shrines in that area that show piled cornice-layers (kapotas or kapotapalis, as
on the late-Gupta lintel from Sarnath) over which gavaksas gradually are arranged and
karnandakas introduced to simulate Nagara patterning. These, as in the early seventh-
century Nagara structures in Karnataka, however, show no balapafijara recesses in the
superstructure, as had been present at Dévgadh in the previous century. Of the full-
fledged Nagara tradition in North India, as it had developed late in the sixth and into
the seventh century a.p., only the Siva temple no. 2 at Mahua survives.
acts
li i
is a plaii n, widi e rece ss cro wne d by a kapota-like chadya that
otapa li
Above th e kapotapa
as a flat slab-roof.
from under the crowning
| chadya of the man
Th e roof of the ageri
pragg riva exten ds
and res ts on a
a paipalir of octa gor onal pilpilllars that have ghat te aaa
ved with cate ti ta
dap ika
: la
(P t n
ha na of the pil lar s is car a hor
aan fe malast lan d-l oop s. The upp er ghatapallava rests on
ae ia a with gar with kirttimukha and
re
and is crowned by a cross-corbel decorated
palmette with fruit designs. sakhas (Plate 268).
-s ha ped format and three
is plain belotsw
corp?
“T
e garbhagrha door wa y has a
st am bh aé ak ha
of scrol’s The
Th
; ; acke
i
The first e a a a riagchgrde signpillars save that the br
on the upper
part,
dis-
t replpeaiants i n ec a iv a oses the overdoor,pport
bu td e pr
ou te r sakha, which also enclst ambhasakha s su
ha ve
Ne profile. The pta temples. The
playe aiipa mo ti f, as seen On late
r Gu
re of wh ic h an elegant simh
akar na
Sa i t as, at th e ce nt its, faced
t w i t h two candraégal nt el al so pr oj ect, forming un
Sith al ects; the ends
of the li laéa, that act almo
st as
wee proj amalaka and ka the right
sities a e n t an d s u rmounted by both ar a, of which that on
s E e c a n c di ng pr at ih
ar i e shows a stan eless ceiling.
o l d e n r sN e ya of each jamb garbhagtha is plain, with a featur to Surya,
h
. Th e in te ri or of the th e te mp le was dedicated
“ilo i Ja la tabimba, sugges
ts th at
Th e pratiharas migh
t then
ac ti ng as on an al ta r.
site aes ar, hipped in the form of a lotus
e wors e sun-god.
a, attendants of th
gn,
e ng al th srivrksa desi
present Da nd a an d Pi
gn , tr ig ak ha doorway wi
, simple plan
and de si ¢. A-D- 600.
Its modest size t th at th is te mp le is assignable to r plan, design, found-
llars su gges with a simi la
and developed pi rth of this shrine stood another st.
2 Hardly 20 ft.
no bandha is lo ury
nd ha . Th e st ru ct ur e ab ove the vedi
ra l pi ec es fr om seventh-cent
ation, and vé di ba archit ec tu d four-
th es e re ma ins lie a few ur es of st an ding Surya an
ae Not far fr
om ain ing sculpt
clude lo ose niches cont
rines; these in i.
ramard in
armed Mahisasu (Figs. 51, 52 b;
Plates 270,
272-273)
no . 1 -northeast
h, ma nd apika sh ri ne
oc k c. fo ur miles nD orth
Ramg ad w hi ll on the
at th e foot of a lo a ro ck facing south
age si tu at ed at ed in are two
Ramgadh is a vill known as the Sat-Marhiya, ex In front of the Sat-Marhiya 1.
¢ av
.
ves,
of Pathari; ca of the hillock, enshrin he so ut h slope is shrine nodibandha
upper slopes on a ve
ik a sh ri ne s (10S. 2 and 3); worship, faces east and stands a, and kapotapali
mandap dedicated to
Siva patt
kumbha, antara praggtiva with two
Shrine no. 1, é da
uare sane déva-
co ns is te d of a modest sq down (Fig. 51; Plate 270). Bold sthas
shrine w fallen ese dévaké
(Fig. 52b). The par
t, s of the kati. Th
pillars in fron plain, curve
ed on and
késthas are carv ounted by a bold
caka pilasters: § galas; this is surm The north dévakdés-
are framed by Ru
rated with tw
o levels).
isible at two of the
ka p6 ta pa li
rn
de
ha
co
ka rn a (w it h pa ck in g
rd in i tr am pl ing on the head
elegant si ed Mahisasurama tail in her left
pr es er ve s a re lief of four-arm om or ph ic fo rm ; she holds its
tha
who ig represen
ted in zo right hand.
buffalo demon, ca rr ie d in her upper slab that
ba ck wi th a tr ig tl a
re ce ss , an da plain roof
it s li , W id e
hand Than d pierces nted by kapotapa
e kati is sur mou first carved with
th e ka po ta pa li. d of fo ur gakhas, the the
extends beyond do or wa y wa s compose soms, the third with stambha, and
The “T”-shthapeedsecond with galmali blos
s,
frothy scroll
ee
Dasarnadééa style, ph ase 1, IL.B.1.
128
and
representing an incipient varandika, the complex cornice that tops the jangha
the upper level at Madhia —
separates it from the sikhara on later Nagara shrines. Only
a superstr ucture.
a vedi platform with corners slightly articulated — can be called
Nanavati and Dhaky, in their discussion of Maitraka-period temples in Surastra,
suggest further evidence for the evolution of Nagara architecture in a series of seventh-
century shrines in that area that show piled cornice-layers (kapotas or kapotapalis, as
on the late-Gupta lintel from Sarnath) over which gavaksas gradually are arranged and
karnandakas introduced to simulate Nagara patterning. These, as in the early seventh-
century Nagara structures in Karnataka, however, show no balapanjara recesses in the
superstructure, as had been present at Dévgadh in the previous century. Of the full-
fledged Nagara tradition in North India, as it had developed late in the sixth and into
the seventh century a.D., only the Siva temple no. 2 at Mahua survives.
2 woe as
a: Lkaayae :
F.
Fig.52. Védibandhas;:
a. Chapara. Mandapika shrine; b. Ramgadh. Mandapika shrine no. ty"
Mandapika shrine no, 2 (ey Rasagadh.
MINOR DYNASTIES: MANDAPIKA AND EARLY NAGARA TRADITIONS 131
fourth with a garland of date-palm pattern (Plates 272-273). The Rucaka stambhasakha
was plain on the lower half and ornate above, showing ghantamala and lotus designs
on the malasthana. It has an upper ghatapallava and brackets of plain, curved profile
which supported two kapotapali mouldings decorated with candrasalas. The central
candragala had a Sivalinga complete with pitha; others were left plain. The architrave
above the doorframe showed a design of plain tulasangraha. The pédyas are embel-
lished with figures of river-goddesses flanked by images of two-armed Saiva pratiharas
holding large trigtilas. The workmanship of these figures is crude compared to that of
the Mahisasuramardini image.
The praggriva had a pair of octagonal pillars with base and upper square ghata-
pallavas. The malasthana was decorated with ghantamala, grasamukha, and lotus
patterns; the brackets are cruciform embellished with talapatra.
The interior of the sanctum is plain and shows clearly that the portion below the
kati is made of four horizontally laid courses and the kati of three vertical slabs
surmounted by a thick lintel and two other courses, above which is the plain, mono-
lithic ceiling.
but is
The shrine is similar in construction to the mandapika shrine at Chapara,
slightly more ornate and may date to c. a.D. 625-650.
other Rucaka pilasters have the same design of lotus shoots and incised darpana motifs
as is found on the pillars of temple no. 18. The remaining pillars are mostly plain,
Rucaka type. Brackets and the entire superstructure are restored. Marshall proposed a
seventh-century date for the temple.
.
mple no. 2, plan
Fig. 54. Mahua. Siva te
th
octagonal section wi
e Ru ca ka pi llars h ave a short car ry a be am
as). Th ts, and
makaras, gajas, OT mithun above an d below, cruci form bracke
orn ame nt oa d kantha ca pped by a roof-slab.
incised darpana li . Ab ov e is a br are carved
a heavy kapotapa w hich the first and third
surmounted by mpo sed of thre
e ga kh as of with
The doorframe is co le is a hi gh ly or namen ted stambhasakha
patravallis. The midd o kapé tapalis
with varieties of ar an a. Th e st am bh asakha supports tw pair ot
and a fluted bh a; there are also a
upper ghatapallava the middle showing Ganééa as lalatabimb e of
with a gurasenaka
in
si kh ar ik as at the ends. Above the imag
small triratha Lati na r-
The base of the doo
candraéalas and two , is a gr ot es que grimacing face. los t.
Ganééa, in the surr
ounding ma la e right éakhas are
sh ow s Ya mu na wi th a chatradharini. Th
frame on the left
, Dagarnadééa style, phase 1, II.B.1.
ae
other Rucaka pilasters have the same design of lotus shoots and incised darpana motifs
as is found on the pillars of temple no. 18. The remaining pillars are mostly plain,
Rucaka type. Brackets and the entire superstructure are restored. Marshall proposed a
seventh-century date for the temple.
Mahu4a, mandapika temple (Siva temple no. 1) (Figs. 53, 55a; Plate 275)
This flat-roofed, east-facing, mandapika shrine has a square garbhagrha and a prag-
griva with two pillars (Fig. 53; Plate 275). The védibandha rests on two plain founda-
tion courses and is composed of khura, kumbha, kalaéa, and kapotapali, the last deco-
rated with hamsas and a pair of ganas as well as with candraéalas (Fig. 55a). The shrine
shows bhadra projections that extend through the védibandha, kati, and varandika. A
tulapitha of six bosses carved with floral designs, grasamukhas, harnsa, and makaras
replaces kalaéa on the bhadra. The mouldings of the praggriva replace kalaga with a
broad antarapatta.
The kati shows four pillars on each side resting on a flat course; the two central
pillars project slightly and frame a shallow niche carved with images of Ganééa (S),
Bhtvaraha (N), and Mahisésuramardini (W) surmounted by a sirnhakarna. The flank-
ing recesses on the kati are carved with kalpavalli (issuing from a yaksa’s navel, with
TRADITIONS
133
MINOR DYNASTIES: MANDAPIKA AND EARLY NAGARA
plan.
temple no. 2,
Fig. 54. Mahua. Siva
short octagonal
section with
ll ar s ha ve a
). The Ruca
ka pi
brackets, and ca
rry a beam
0 ; mi th un as cr uc if or m
makaras, gaja
s, and below, e d by a roof-slab.
incised darpana ornam
ent ab ove
ov e is a br oad kantha capp rd are carved
ed by a he av y kapotapali.
Ab
as of wh ic h the first an d thi
su rm ou nt e sa kh akha with
do or fr am e is co m posed of thre is 4 highly ornamente d stambhag palis
The s. The middle ha sup ports two kapota
et ie s of pa tr av al li e st am bh as ak
with vari ara na. Th also a pair of
at ap al la va and a fluted bh ing Ganésa as|lalatabimba; there are
upper gh
in the middle sh
ow
as at the ends. Ab
ove the image of
a su ra se na ka gi kh ar ik door-
with tw o sme 11 triratha La
ti na
aci ng face. The base of the
cand ra ga la s an d ot es qu e gr im
s14 is a gr has are lost.
né éa , in th e surroun
na wi th a ch at radharin i. The right sak
Ga
frame on the le ft shows Yamu
1.
Dasarnadééa style, phase 1, I1.B.
vif
The praggriva has a pair of plain Rucaka pillars with incised darpana ornament as
on the kati’s pilasters. Two ornate pilasters to either side of the doorway are carved
with ghatapallava at base and top, have a broad octagonal neck with earey
spewing pearl-chains, and show vertical strips of vine scrolls on the sides and front O
the square shaft. The malasthanas are embellished with vidyadhara-mithunas,
mayuras, and a yaksa amidst foliage.
The front beam of the praggriva carries a four-line inscription on its outer face
engraved in characters assignable to no later than the third quarter of the seventh
century. The inscription refers to the foundation of a “sila-mandapika” dedicated to
Dhiurjati (Siva) “for the increase of the religious merit of [his] parents” by a chief
called
Vatsaraja of a local dynasty that claims to have ruled in the region for five generation
s.
The inscription is a metrical praégasti composed by a poet called Bhatta Isana of
Kanyakubja.
The shrine is assignable to c. a.p. 650-675.
Mahua, Siva temple no. 2 (Figs. 54, 55b; Plates 276-279)
This temple, situated on a rock just outside the village of Mahua, is the earliest gre
surviving in Central India to have a fully developed Latina gikhara. Though
poorly
preserved, all of the significant architectural features survive. The praggriva, mukha-
mandapa, and Nandi-mandapa are lost. The garbhagrha is of a developed
tri-anga plan.
The cardinal bhadra-projections each contain a sunken niche
framed by a doorway,
with padma course, tulasangraha, kapotapali, and a dvi-pharhsana pediment with
simnhakarna fronton above, and extend through the sikhara as madhyalata;
these are
AWMHO
ee
|
1 |
N<-— Fig. 57. Gyaraspur- Mandapika
temple no.1 overlooking temple no. 1, véedibandha.
Fig. 56. Gyaraspur. Mandapika
Manasarovara tank, plan.
is not original. A broken
is preserved, though the existing linga
An old lingapitha
of Siva lies nearby. peculiar cross-
but contemporary image its use of pilasters, and the of
This temple is related
in ornament, n be assigned a date
the varandika to temp le no. 1, and ca
lintel in the masonry under
C. A.D. 650-675. 280-282)
sa ro va ra ta nk (Figs. 5 6-57; Plates
1 above th e Mana
Gyaraspur, shrine no. the west bankk ofot the
Manasarovara
ing
we st -f ac in g ma nd ap ika shrine, overlook , its foundation is s uppo
rted on the
This on a sor t of pre cip ice
lain foundation
tank, is much damaged; built vedibandha , standing on Pp
wall of boulders. Its otapali (Fig. 57).
As with
east by a retaining kumbha, kal aga , an d kap
courses, is composed of khura,
——
Daéarnadééa style, phase 1, II.B.1.
i
The praggriva has a pair of plain Rucaka pillars with incised darpan
a ornament as
on the kati’s pilasters. Two ornate pilasters to either side of the doorw
ay are carved
with ghatapallava at base and top, have a broad
octagonal neck with eee
spewing pearl-chains, and show vertical strips of vine scrolls
the square shaft. The malasthanas are embell on the sides and front o
ished with vidyadhara-mithunas,
mayuras, and a yaksa amidst foliage.
The front beam of the praggriva carries a four-line
inscription on its outer face
engraved in characters assignable to no
later than the third quarter of the seven
century. The inscription refers to the found th
ation of a “sila-mandapika” dedicated
Dhirjati (Siva) “for the increase of the religious merit of [his] parents” to
Vatsaraja of a local dynasty that claims to have ruled in the by a chief called
region for five generations.
The inscripti on is a metrical praéasti comp
osed by a poet called Bhatta Isana of
Kanyakubja.
The shrine is assignable to c. A.D.
650-675.
Mahué, Siva temple no. 2 (Figs. 54,
55b; Plates 276-279)
This temple, situated on a rock just outside the villa
ge of Mahu, is the earliest temple
surviving in Central India to have a fully deve
loped Latina gikhara. Though poorly
preserved, all of the significan t architectural featu
res survive. The praggriva, mukh
mandapa, and Nandi-mandapa are lost. The a-
garbhagrha is of a developed tri-anga plan.
The cardinal bhadra-projections each contain
a sunken niche framed by a doorway,
with padma course, tulasangraha, kapOt
apali, and a dvi-phamsana pediment
simhakarna fronton above , and extend through the sikhara as madh with
yalata; these are
_——S—— ee,
4
Yo
J
S|
,
__
Toe nt s_BE
(2/Ha
C a
— ,
0
Fig.55. Mahua, védibandhas: a. Siva temple no. 1; b. Sivatemple no. 2.
» aS an inner vénuk6éa, for the full height of
inner and outer venuk6éa-bands, a broad
recess shows well-
MINOR DYNASTIE S: MANDAPIKA AND EARLY NAGARA TRADITIONS 1 35
Mahua temple no. 1, kalasa is replaced on the bhadra by tulapitha. The kati feos
ornate Rucaka pilasters with elegantly carved slabs set between. Prominent déva =
thas project as bhadras between the central pairs of pilasters. The dévakosthas ne
fronted by pairs of small octagonal pillars with ghatapallava at base and top, ett
ing kapotapali, short védika, and an udgama pediment. Only the devakostha oD la-
east is preserved. Pilasters are profusely ornamented (Plates 281-282) with ghatapa *
va at base and top, malasthana carved with kirttimukha with pearl-chains, Ree’ :
karimakara surmounted by short octagonal sections of ghantamala and play a
and a plain crowning abacus with ornate brackets carved with miscellaneous jaa
such as peacock, geese, kirttimukha, and talapatra. Only two of the slabs ies ag
pilasters are preserved (Plate 282), one each on the east and north. These are Sad” AG
ly carved with padmalata and patravalli and are crowned by bold candrasalas a
lintel level. The kati is capped by kapdtapali, with courses below of tulasangraha ae
merlons; above is a kantha capped by a simple pattika representing a chadya. It
superstructure above the chadya corresponds in size to the four interior pillars.
consists of a védika, kapotapali, plain kantha, and a monolithic, flat roof-slab. ee
The interior of the garbhagrha has four, tall, Rucaka pillars at the corners, Pee
except for a pair of lotus flowers carved to either side of a brief octagonal section.
Cruciform brackets are plain or have a large kirttimukha with talapatra.
This is a highly ornate mandapika shrine, more developed than the Mahua temple
no. 1, and may be dated c. a.p. 675.
Gyaraspur, shrine no. 2 above the Manasarovara tank (Plates 283-285)
This ruined Saiva shrine preserves only a west-facing doorway, two interior pillars of
the garbhagrha, a portion of the sanctum ceiling, and a portion of the core fabric of the
Sukanasa.
The “T’-shaped doorway had five sakhas (Plate 284). The outer sakha is lost
Py:
except for the mala and band of lotus petals above. Surviving sakhas comprise patra
sakha, nagasakha, ratnagakha, and a highly ornate stambhaéakha. The stambhaéakha is
Rucaka, decorated with ghatapallavas near the base and at the top; a strip of scroll
connects the basal ghatapallava with a malasthana embellished with kirttimukha and
thin registers of patravalli and harnsas, surmounted by a short octagonal section carved
with lotus flowers. The brackets are carved with kirttimukha and support an overdoor
of three kapétapalis with a central udgama (containing a Sivalinga and its pitha), two
udgamas on the side, and two projected udgamas at the ends. Garuda appears as
lalatabimba on the patrasakha. The pédya bases of the jambs show standing river-
goddesses; a two-armed Saiva pratihara wearing jatajiita is preserved on the right.
The architrave above the overdoor is carved with patravalli and a luxurious band of
padmalata with a figure of jambhaka in the middle.
The garbhagrha had tall, plain pillars of the Rucaka type, similar to the interior
pillars of the mandapika shrine nearby.
Surviving courses of the core of the sikhara suggest that there was a Sukanasa over
the doorway. This is consistent with a Latina sikhara similar to
that seen on Mahua
temple no. 2. The decorative motifs on the shrine indicate stylisti
c affinity to the
adjacent mandapika shrine. The tem ple would appear to
be roughly coeval with
Mahua temple no. 2 and the neighbouring mandapika shrine,
and can be assigned to
C. A.D. 675.
Krishna Deva
2 137
MMINOR DYNASTIES: : MANDAPIKA> AND EARLY NAGARA TRADITIONS
REFERENCES
PSJHALAWAR
andrabhaga 2
CHOTT SADR x 3
|
(Jhalrapatan)
5
isos
MANDASOR _., |
(Sondani,
NT
~
MALAVA
w
MILES
minor chiefdoms
Historical Introduction
part of
nd Ujjayini (Ujjain), the western
Malava in ancient times was the region arou the earli est
at least the first century 8.c.;
present Malwa, ruled by the Malava tribe from by the Malav a
using the Vikr ama Era describe the era as “handed down the
inscriptions whom control of at least
to inv asion by various powers, to
tri be. ” Lon g sub jec t al and regional security, the
Mal wa pla teau was important for imperi
aa iph eri es of the ed provincial capitals
often was threatened, as it absorb
cultural integrity of the region
for a number of distant dynasties. Saka s by Can dragupta II in the
Gupta period,
f was seiz ed from the idasa wrote from
: Ujjayini itsel under Gupta hegemony (Kal
rtan t cent re of cult ure s. The Kuva-
ecoming an impo regi onal posi tion continued for many centurie
this region al cour t) and its avas from
erentiates the Mal
at Jalo r (Raj asthan) in A.D. 778, diff likely
layamala, writ ten various invasions, it is
Lata s, and Mar avas, and, in spite of eri al Prat ihara
ava s, of Imp
Gurjaras, Saindh ly independent until the spread
that the region remained relative (A reference in the Jaina
to the reg ion earl y in the ninth century 4 p. a re fe re nce
hegemony t to be
ég a- pu ra na of a.p . 78 3 to an “A vantiraja,” sometimes though
Harivarm ent ruler in the region.)
lik ely refers to an independ the
sent- day Chittaudgadh in
to a Pr at ih ar a ki ng , mo re
n of Nag ari (Ma dhy amika-nagari), near pre imp ort ant cen tre
The tow Rajasthan, also was an
(up per Mal ava) region of eastern y have been
Upa ram ala
sec ond cen tur y p.c. Many coins of the Sibi dynast struction
from at least the thi rd-
tury B.C. records the con
the re, and an ins cri pti on of the early first cen ava tribe, ruled as vassals from
found Aulikaras, a clan ofthe Mal
of a “Narayana-vataka.” The Pra desh) in the Gupta period. An
inscription
Man das or in Mad hya shrine by
Dagapura (modern h, rec ord s the building of a Matrka
ri, nea r Nee muc
of a.p. 491 from Choti Sad na of Dagapura named Gauri.
Adi tya var dha rule in Malava
Hinas had ousted Gupta Séndani near
a feudatory of
fift h cen tur y A.D the
By the end of the ikara chiefs. Inscriptions on
pillars set up at
and had subjugated the Aul Yasodharma Visnuvardhana,
record, however,
532 , by the Aul ika ra both inscrip-
Dagapura in a.p. fro m the Hina invader, Mihirakula;
fre ed the reg ion
that he had by then s of the Aulikara
to Yas odh arm a as “Ra aja dir aja-Paramesvara.” Remain an elegant stone
tions refer brick temple, with
are substantial, an d a tury, reflecting the
period around Mandasor r! ear ly in the sixth cen
ives , was buil t at Naga
torana that still surv Yaégodharma’s kingdom.
headquarters within arastra
town’s position as a district cen tur y A.D. , the Kalacuris of northern Mah
six th
Toward the close of the e of Aulikara power
the ir pow er int o wes ter n Malava; “whether the c ollaps
extended
e, jI.B.2-
140 Malava styl
and the rise of the Guhila houses in Rajasthan have both to be regarded as the sane
Kalacuri expansion in Malwa,” D.C. Sircar remarks, “cannot be determined wi
further evidence.”
,
Mirashi, however, has published an inscription from Mandasor of a Og eeeraapee
tuler named Kumaravarma whom he dates to c. a.p. 580-610. The inscription pea
“a son of Krsna” slayed in battle by Kumaravarma, which Mirashi suggests is a ee
ence to Sankaragana, son of Krsna of the early Kalacuri dynasty (c. A.D. 530- hs
(Sankaragana’s Abhona plates of a.v. 597 were issued following an earlier ceasehink
and victory in Malava.) The inscription provides a lineage for Kumaravarma consis
of:
[Ya]jnadéva
VirasOma
Bhaskaravarma
Kumaravarma
Architectural Features
Fragmentary remains from the sixth and seven
th centuries in Malava suggest a variety
of artistic residues, possible in
a period o f political fragmentation and in a region
,like
| AULIKARA S, MAURYAS, AND MINOR CHIEFTAINS
s of the
e of other regions. (Architectural remain
Maun BoM withoe wide a rang
. .
.
ter.) The
Ma
ae cenes on one
Mord The |aaa abe of this torana was carved with Kiratarjuniya-s
er cross-beam had makara heads at each
entieacaae panels on the other; the upp
chitectural representations on the cross-lintel that show dvibhima Pham-
Bee 2 tforms sup-
sana4 structures faced wit. h candrasalas and with small, square, stone pla
the upper bhumi (Plate 291).
1).
pei besten amalakas represented to either side of are suggested at Séndani and
Sarnath,
as 8 osa a been found at Bhamara and
in the seventh century, and
a sad, are still utilized on structures in Surastra
superstructure, where they
ute conceptually to the formulation of the Nagara
become incorporated as bhamikhandas.
Makanganj, temple no. 1 (Figs. 59, 60a; Plate 292) er in the
T . .
preserved of two shrines that stand within 2 0 ft. of each oth
his is the
fiields outsid
better f lage of Makanganj, about 2.5 miles northeast of Bichor in District
. e the vil
Mackintosh, who founded it
pe toreanE Rajasthan. (The village was named after Mr. bears an
col ony of Min as in c. A.D. 1844.) The shrine faces north and
fat ae . Made of ashlars, the temple has
a flat-roofed
on in a nich e on the sout h wall
ipti
praggriva with two pillars.
rectangular garbhagrha and a ta, primi-
shows kumbha, broad antarapat
lyoapad rtpalyttikexaspo, seand,tarapatta,
baam
eudvéadifr
tive aum ha, byonbr
nded and kapota. The kati has a bhadra
wall, a central sunk nic he
framed by Rucaka
On the east
File eae on the sou th. contains the
ea pat ter n, and crowned by a bold sirmhakarna,
insertaiio bgt drasalas and a
ped bya kap ota pal i decorated with large can
aan n. The kati is cap
-edged slabs of a flatroof, of which only remnants
recess crowned by the kapota
have survived. the square
of the praggriva stand on square simple kumbhakas;
Toa ae two pillars a square block
is plain, above which is a short octagonal necking, an
er shaft of each deeply fluted belly, and
ornamented with kirttimukhas, ghatapallava, a ghata with
corbels.
octagonal section with leaf-drops crowned by plain of
is c. 14 -lines long and refers to the construction
d,
| sy The inscription, much abrade his son Gopasimha. The temple, assig nable like the
by one Dattasimha and m and has lost its
| aby has a tree growing through its sanctu
ake ee Cc. A.D . 625 -65 0, ntation, how-
doo rwa y. Its rec tan gul ar plan and northern orie Mahisasura-
aN ne ivinity and Sakta affiliation. (Garde reports that an image of
ake icate a probable as well as a
tem ple in Bic hor is said to have come from this site,
é ini in the Mat a
village of Barduni.)
caturmukhalinga moved to the
Plates 293-294)
Makangajnij, shrine no. 2 (Figs. 58, 60b;
bhagrha and a mukha mand
apa of which only
ted of a gar
This east-facing shrine consis the shrine has bhadra
sout h walls survive. Built of ashlars, on
portio ns of the nort h and
two massiv e foundati
on thr ee sid es. The védibandha stands above me d by br oa d
projections kalasga fra
com pos ed of khu ra- kumbha, antarapatta, and pat tik a an d
courses and is is capped by a simple
ng kapota. The plain kati
pattikas, but with no crowni kan tha and
rest two
a thin slab o f stone on whichi courses
is a pro min ent
kapéta, above which er this takes the
form of two kapota pal
courses of a primitive sup structure: w hich that on the north
harbours a
bha dra s, of
énakas
faced by large guraserttimukha,
ove r the
of antelopes or vya
las, a lion’s head
de d ki fla nke d by a pai r
grotesque bear n; the south
(Pl ate 294 ); the wes t sh ow s tulapitha and chequer patter
in the level abov e king pent-roof
tern, with lio ns on the corners of the bac
shows stepped diamond pat units of the superstr ucture show paired kapotapali
Pharsana. Surviving corner
[1.B.2.
Malava style,
Sees.
LLL
et (ornamented
es, faced with a large ha lf- can dra sal a resting on a square pillar the
cornic the cornice-layers of
paired erns ), separated from
darpana-patt
with plain
madhyalata by a recess. , the exact form of th e supe
rstructure remains
poo r pre ser vat ion there are sufficient
nec tees ofits a squ at typ e of piled Pham sana,
kegs ee while it may
hav e ha d
tructure, as per haps
that at Akhédar in
ara sup ers
mit ive Nag Gujarat, not
eee suggest a pri
are of a typ e fou nd on early shrines in
candrasal as suggest
Geta - Ihe unincised ks are of Mal ava type, and these shrines
mukha-mas
ral India, but the kirtti her than an extension of Surastra norms.
local stylistic
. .
am al ga m rat
ates 295-300)
a
Sitalesvara
us . c. Candrabhaga.
Fig. 60. Védibandhas: an) tem ple Bo e
no. 4: b, Makang
a. Makangaiij, temple (Courtesy: contributor.
)
mulapraséda.
Mahadeva temple,
146
i — a_i
Saat
DS Ja =
Ss
Sa = aes =a
VOOMa, gfe Wiree Wow
taeian sti Wiaueuan (al
= | |
SS
EEE a ee
otL e a AS
HAN,
i 1.
K Ki l
Cl
TS
Ms R( =
DAA
IR SA
veil!
iterLa
“Qt
=
|
yi ly ISIE
=
i
= =H |p
<I] | SAI Ie
&
2))}}
ye
J
Sk
aS
Me
ae
ae
i34.
AS
we
SOS
"A
=< Ya)
BG
SS
EAS
)
=
3et
: SAG,
". i
WINS Ewa
TIAN
Ds
wear
G3
5=:
BE
FOES
é
Sk aOES
RAS!
=TRO
SSSR
Te <=
SN
tors
mDISS
Ss
x
SN:
Sawee)
Bot
SS
S to
OS
,
Wii
=
== ‘Ht
SYS
D RY
(
>4i}
S |
Zar,
oT,
—as
aa
ITs
7=
ab
tee
Can
ENExate
SEINE
oY
SEIT
aes 225
J)
OS:
Stas
C/E
~=hS>
3ON
46
( ,=)
=U
WON
kM,I/O
asxA ie
WenSY
; ti ‘i ReyZ3}WS
SANS
A)‘S
yyEy,
fbNFAAS=nse)
OSE :
SS
a>
Payday)
ifs
BOF
es12)aRS
yeAS SS
Wiener
eS
ee
Ne
ais
SS
RYrSss)
=>
-= Ps
Gs
onaa,
SS
PG
=FOS
AiEa
SN
N
N)
NN
N
N
NY
NNS
NN
Wu
WOON
in A
temple, plan.
bha ga (Jha lrap ata n). Sitalésvara Mahadéva
Fig. 62. Candra
)
(Courtesy: contributor.
148 Malava style, IJ.B.2.
ight-angles
r-pilasters, and are formed by two, broad, attached pillars set at right-ang es
Natcets
ate ac leeoeavtiaien unique in the stone tradition and eat BY ae arn
the support of large (wooden) beams, The ceiling of the garbhagrha in
of heavy beams, an early form of stone construction
i found also in i some of the Maitraka
shrines in Surastra.
The praggriva has plain, masonry, kapili walls, each
adorned Re rkae
. ® bh
a
. The stambhasakha
of tulapitha below;
Ove is a védika the k
with
e pillars
all ava wit h a dan gli ng pea rl- cha in loop enclosing a half lotus. Som namented
ghatap hitectural cornice represented abo
ve (or
show a ghatapallava base, an darcof open foliage with makara-torana above, a secon
with small candraéalas), a ban es
ern , a blo ck wit h kir tti muk ha patt ern, and a narrow puspa band. The bas t-
cornice-patt ations, and the prat
upp er flu ted bha ran i-b loc ks for these pillars are later restor e pillars is kept
and
ure s are in som e case s par tly recut. All ornament on thes dent for this
hara fig
ned as a sur fac e for the mon olithic square shaft. An antece parallel for
carefully contai at Mandasor and Nagari; some
nd in remains
style to an extent can be fou Dha mék h stupa at Sarnath and in
fragments of the
be fou nd on the
the open foliage can aras near Jodhpur.
h cen tur y fro m the cap ital of the Mandor Pratih
sevent
Michael W. Meister
REFERENCES
1904-1905, 31-32.
vey of Ind ia, Wes ter n Circle, Progress Report, Memoirs of the Archae
ologi-
Archaeological Sur al Rem ain s and Exc avations at Nagari,”
Archaeologic
e
D.R. Bhandarkar, “Th of Asian Art,
of Ind ia, 4, Calcutta 1920. , Chitorgarh,” Archives
cal Sur vey
“Th e Chr ono log y of Chandravati, Kusuma
Carol G. Lin-Bodien,
graphical Evidence, ” Indian
XXXII (1980), 49-64. ha de va Te mple at Candr avati: Epi 5, 115-119.
Carol G. Lin-Bodien, “The
Sital egv ara Ma . Gai, eds., New Delhi 198
of Art , F.M. Asher and G.S 65) , 267; XXI I (1883-84),
Reports, II (1862-
g on the His tor y
Epigraphy, Its Bearin al Sur vey of Ind ia
m, Archaeologic
Alexander Cunningha
125-130. Delhi 1969, 16, 28.
Deva, Temples of North India, New Gwalior State, 1929-30,
19-20, 58.
Krishna the Archaeological
Department,
rt of
MN. Garde, Annual Repo
180-183; 56 (1927), 213. of Oriental Art, nN. s.
XI
Indian Antiquary, 5 (1876),Pillar from Mandasor,” Journal of the Indian Society
Carved
Kirit Mankodi, “A Asian Art ,
(1980), 34-42. Kansuan,” Archives of
d Cav e: Te m ples at Candrabhaga and
Michael W. Meister, “Fo
rest an
ia graphy,
Reconsidered,” Indian Epi
34 (1981), 56-73. storiography of Temples on the Candrabhaga,
“Hi New Delhi 1985, 121-123.
Mic l W. Meister,
hae G.S. Gai, eds. , Institute,
Its Bearing on the History of Art,
F.M. Ashe r and Journal of the Oriental
ment ary Insc ript ion of Kumiaravarman, »
Frag
V.V. Mirashi, “Mandasor
Baroda XXXII (1982), 70-75.
Kishkindha, Calcutta 1965.
D.C. Sircar, The Guhilas of London 1832.
quit ies of Rajasthan, vol. 2, 3), 50-56.
James Tod, Annals and Anti Mand asor,” Archives of Asian
Art, 26 (1972-197
“The Scul ptur e of
Joanna G. Williams,
150
Kari Talai © 4
—~ Choti Dévri
ee,
II.B.3.
ee
CHAPTER 12
di an st yl e: St yl e of Da és arnadesa,
Varieties of North In th to ea rl y te nt h ce nt ury
phases 2 and 3, c. mid- ei gh
A.D.
Historical Introduction
g powers, in
er ri to ry bordered by feudin
Central India late in the eighth
cen tur y was at Palas in the
tra kut as in the Deccan, and the
the wes t, Ras uries, who
particular the Pratiharas in by loc al pri nce s, a s in previous cent
primarily ous pow-
east, yet a region still ruled affi liat e da s fe ud at ories to the vari
ified
were either independent or
only casually
Kan auj ha d he ld Gopadri as a fort
itories. Yagovarma of succes-
ers who crossed their terr cen tur y, an d his immediate
quarter of the eighth eighth century,
border region in the second al imp ort anc e. Late in the
sors used Gwalior as a
centre of reg ion confrontations
cro sse d Malava in their
tern Ind ia may hav e gion in the
Pratihara princes from Wes and may wel l hav e occ upi ed parts 0 f the re in
nces anded power
with Pala and Rastrakita pri ished, with a base for exp
ire was establ capital
half century before their emp b Pra tih ara for ces and becam e their
ch was seized y
North India at Kanauj, whi
early in the ninth cen tur y 4-D. ack on the forces
sse d par ts of Malava in his att
Vatsaraja Pratihara und oub ted ly cro
by the attac k of Rast
rakuta Dhruva
fort s in Raj ast han ated
of Gauda, but was driven bac k to gabhata II, defe e
and 793. Vatsaraja’s successor Na ll forts of th
some time between a.D. 786 Lor d of Vanga, and senmed the hi
van qui she d the e Gwalior
Cakrayudha of Kanauj,
Kira ta, Tur usk a, and Vatsa accor ding to th
kings of Anarta, Malava, Mat
sya , ssure from
I. The Ras tra kut a Gov inda III feeling pre y,
prasasti of his grandson
Bhoja the ninth centur
(c. A.D. 802) early in
in raided North India er his depar-
Pratihara conquests, aga e Sa fj n pla tes , but soon retired. Only aft
cording to th Aja
Kanauj and move to con
tain the
retaking Malava ac h his fir m hol d on
ed a high
a II establis
ture could Nagabhat l Ind ia, ho we ve r,
Security in Centra and the Jaina Pra
Palas in the east. esence to the south,
Ra st ra ku ta pr
priority, gi ve n alior.
of a sp le nd id Pr atihara court at Gw tra l India gave a stabil
ity and
a description in No rt h an d Cen eract
the ninth century ar chitecture could int
Pratihara rule in al st yl es of Na ga ra
ny under which re
gion mandapika shrines,
breadth of hegemo er ge . Lo ca l conceptions for style.
unl ified, st yl e em g with the central
and a new, more In di a in th is period, interactin
ued in Central
however, contin
Architectural Feat
ures to be built in
sl ab su pe rs tr uc tures continue d
es with simple
Mandap ika pavilion-shrin
ee four pillars in the c
pport directly the
mouldings and uppe mandovara
r superstructure (B
Barlyna deica shri adoh).
ends replacing kalaga in nes had often shown a slight bhadra e oe ith tuld-
the védibandha and a non ee ho-
€n a central pair of Pil niche placed either
asters (Mahua) or wi in Bese ein
this period, however, tila-e th a projecting balcon
nds disappear in the y ( VE iysarnall
mandapika shrine védibandha, and,
s are built on a increasingly,
imposed above strai got
ht manma asiitra, but with Nagara towers ee
- Kuchdon, 0 nea r Devgadh, the earliest r
the eighth century) such shrine (c. third
Pilasters pushed Clea rly sho Ws in the arra quar
ngement of its walls, p
clo se to bhadra
pil with pratiriratatha
f
Pects of these
ers of the Sa
tTmost Nagar nctum, Frag-
a temp le at Narésar
153
PRATIHARA PERIOD: MANDAPIKA SHRINES
e-eighth century
and the ambulatory wall to the Jaina temple no. 12 at Dévgadh (lat
form of enclo-
A.D.) suggest that perforated mandapika walls were not an uncom mon
sure, in fact, for Nagara shrines in this period and region.
the mandapika shrine there had been
Be i inscription at Mahua had suggested that
of the patron’s parents, and it seems likely
uilt for the “increase of the religious merit”
built in this region primarily as memorial
that such small shrines continued to be
in the tenth century — fully in Nagara form
shrines. Even small temples at Kadwaha the
n jala filling the recesses between
but with thin walls and with checker-patter a continu a-
y karnas and bhadras — suggest
pilasters on the pratirathas and the masonr
tion of this local tradition.
es 303-308)
Kuchdén, Kuraiya Bir (Figs. 63-64; Plat miles
is situated along a streamlet about two
This east-facing Siva temple (Plate 303) are tri-anga garbha-
gadh. The temple consists of a squ
east of the Gupta temple at Dev sho ws a mandapika
single bay (Fig. 63). The jangha
grha and a mukhamandapa of a (Plate 305); its roof,
str uct ion ma de of separate stones
t-a nd- pla nk con hara (Plate 308).
type of pos
por ts a sma ll sar vat obh adra structure with a Latina sik
however, sup ws khura, kumbha,
sta nds on a pla in foundation course and sho , and
with harnsa, kinnara-mithuna
The véediband ha
and vas ant apa tti ka car ved
kalasa, kapétapali, . 64).
grasamukhas emitting patravalli (Fig a deep niche on
-30 6) ris ing on the vasantapattika shows
The jan gha (Pl ate s 305 of similar but slightly
d by a pai r of Ruc aka pilasters. Another pair
each bhadra fla nke tirathas. The karnas
aga ins t tho se of the bhadra form the pra
broader pilast ers bui lt from the latter by a
tho se of the pratirathas, separa ted
show pilasters identical
wit h hua). The deep
all i (as on the ma ndapika shrine at Ma
|
salilantara relieved
by patrav 306); the other two bhadra
| the wes t har bou rs seated Karttikeya (Plate interior of
bhadra nic he on
sla bs hav e bee n removed, revealing the
the ima ge- by a
niches are empty (because to be win dow s). The se bhadra niches are capped
ear
the sanctum, these now app The Rucaka pilasters
of the jangha have
and a broad udgama. of patravalli, and
heavy dandacchadya upp er part s, linked by vertical panels
er and
ghatapallava on the low
are crowned by palmette brackets. and, on
ota pal i, a ra pa ka nt ha ¢ arved with padmalata
by kap the chadya
The jangha is topped and a slightly curved chadya (Plate 303). Above
one side, a pair of hams
as enting the interior
ha capped by another chadya, repres
occurs a broad, plain kant
dimensions of the sanctum below. triratha, tribhtima,
for a sm all shrine with a
as a b ase of which are
The upper chadya acts
jan gha has 0 pe ni ngs on four sides, all
Nagara éikhara (Plate 308)
. The
wit h a pair of circul
ar pillars that
A shor t prag griv a,
dows.
closed by latticed win
sh or t su ka na si ka , is attached on each sidee.gakhas (Plate 307): patra-, naga-
support a do or frame is composed
of fiv
s, apsarases, and
i Th e sa nc tu m’ s
pal m), rapa- (with gandharva
dat e
(resembling the bar k of the resented as lalatabimba
| and bev ell ed pat ravalli. Garuda is rep yas show river-
vidyadharas), stambha-, nagas, flanked by flying maladharas. The péd ls and with
of a, with its thin wal
holding the tail-ends erior of the garbhagrh the
ants. The int r link with
goddesses with attend t the sup ers tru ctu re, provides anothe
that suppor
four corner pillars
mandapika tradition. tw o pillars and on two
bay. its roof resting on
The mukhamandapa is a sing le hakala and Nandi,
figu res 0 f the Saiva pratiharas, Ma ell
ornate Rucaka pilasters that bear
s bear designs of ch ain-and-b
fluted, octagona | pillar
on their lower half. The
|
154
B.3-
Daéarnadééa style, phases 2 & 3, I1.
155
PRATIHARA PERIOD: MANDAPIKA SHRIN: ES
2 A @ a= = m4
ws ” e5 @ wn oe)s
86
(E), and
a is Carved, ikéya. On their simple trigaParvati (N); the
kha doorways,
mandapika Si
da of Batésa
ra and Padhaval
Village show slight i Contain a la
these, the diese ; vATOUS rge number of
4 ne stfratom es of Preservation
Se ve ra l to
small
antarapatta orname th os e at Batésara al th e ea st
nt i, wy Mea ready iscussed of Padhavali
sh ri ne built 1 a low jaga , Typical of
mouldings are On a ti
© kati is ma strat nis _ Perforat
ed ar hapadma, of kh ura-kumbha,
‘
and a recegs betweenln Mi Nk » Made from 4 Si an apotapali; védiba
ndha
Sha ih 8 two Ru ngle sla of ston
e for each wall
caekant
oe-bratch
TOll ck e sup por ted al li a central sl
pil ast er S with drop
-leaf brack
.
ShMi
~’ CO erce a with ets
, andya Projecti
Sir dgama Pne pad a-Dlat 1 to ei
recess Su ), and Gan diment form wi
pport} éégaq (S ¥ meee
a : Pee
'
ws perforated
157
PRATI HARA PERIOD: MANDAPI KA SHRINES
uldings.
d v edibandha mo
up, te mp le s nos . 11 -13, plans an
gro
Fig. 65. Batésara. Northern
158
Dasarnadééa style, phases 2&
ay I1.B.3
triangular ardhapadma-p
attern: above is a
Sikhara above, heavy, unmoulded i
slab as roof with nO
The interior shows
a saw- tooth awning-pa
plain lotus relief on ttern on the upper cro ‘
ss-lintel a nd has a
the ceiling.
Jala and other omam
ent: S Suggest a date
early in the ninth centur
Pathari, Satmadhi y A.D.
a group, s ven ma
ndapika shrines (Fig' s. 66
This cluster of seve -68; Plates 319 -320) :
n deserted mandap
mile east of Pathar ik a shrines is found :
—_LL
—
i. Each made of in a sh b forest bout on
pla a few flat slabs, these shrines ru a
stand on one or two
laga, and kapota and have th € usual
——
pali, On each védibandha of khura-kumbha
bhadra, th , narrow
i
_Temple no,
8, the most
Jagati co ™M elabor
level slab of khura-kumb ately ornamente
posed
or ha
W thease Consisti
ng of short khur
a, Saw-tooth a-
' Tesemble ¢ band, curved
a padma
tform, as well as
temple at Badoh da
table to
atin fol]
» the wal] ar g late riha ndapika
eatin
; the Pilast ti cu la formulas is this
ey oMame
h
ted ; ‘ong cent
ur
odd Pharnsana-
of pi y,
as a Seri
a8 been left es lars tswiwa ll s an
Unfinisheg Bh th hat d mouldings
adra ie 8
: €s
A 4
have in,
159
PRATIHA
‘TIHARA PERIOD: MANDAPIKA SHRINES
.
S2-=-=
= ts=
7, plan.
group, temple no.
Fig. 67. Pathari. Satmadhia
160 3, IL.B. 30
Dasarna dééa style, phase s2&
oo
init MN ea (faayan
g
xten Candragalikag
Clerestory. ds the tibbed khy,
The Vvédi a as awni © superstruc
bandha ab
ove sits ng
On a gj ™ple and th € first bhimi ture.
matica, as a sort of
Krishna
Deva i
Michael W.
Meiste
REFERENCES
Krishna
Deva, Te
Michae} mples O
W. Meis f Nort
hew Seri ter. “Con Stru India
ctij on 4 » New Delhi
D R. Pati es 26 { 976),
l, The
nd Conc
40 pti
Gwalior Descript 9-418,
1952, ive an
d
I1.B.4.
CHAPTER 13
ri s of Tr ip ur t: Ma nd ap ik a Shrines
Kalacu
Historical Introduction
the third century
ng s ru l ed fr om Mahismati in led
Th ree generati. ons of early Kalacuri
ki curi s, who ru
” bu t th e ma in line of Kala
er a “Kalacuri Er a, ury A.D-
A.D.
Ae ee the use of to po we r on ly in the eighth cent of the epic and
The Lae fae came associated with
the Haihayas Three
2 0 a g e to be
-M an dh at a re gion of Malava.
ns an ti issued
settled in the Av
io
pupatiia tradit
P a e ly — ru le d fr om Mahismati and
A.D.
Plicnee eae: oa aragana, and Buddhara ed the Kalacuri Era, beginning in n-
ja
laitdeerantts ts era nOW call rat, the Ko
Eb en a an unspecified ri sd ic ti on ov er parts of Guja aja are
adele
a s su ggest Kalacuri
ju
rb ha ). Th e coins of Krsnar two
da t
ion for at leas rict,
en t (including Vi
anaiand pres Ma ha ra sh tr a ue d in ci rc ul at
a d ay ‘n , Nasik Di st
found in these co nt ig uo us region dated A.p. 597, from Abhona -
e e e e of the land
centuries.aiAe ae of Sankaragana, torious camp” at Ujjayini. On idi sa
nea sen ne from th
e “vic
, wa s 1
e e a
, Nasik Di st ri ct
grants of e ai rom Vadnér
t de tea s e Kalacuris come
Pe
8 e o -g ra nts of the early in c. A-D- ana, and
ate. the last
ri ru le r, was defeatedannexed Maharastra, the Konk thin a
a y Kalacu Pulakési II, jarat, and wi
king, Maengafeae his successor,
at sm al l po rt io n of present Gu ti; Sankaragana
Cuna nk toa ted to Pasupa
ee power shra ioned as devo
fang ahaa a Krsnar aj a 1s me nt
ed away. part of Dahala.
One
Pa hae
ot ll ed ‘p ar am amahesvara.” ru li ng in
araja are ca ighth century, ott
io ns fo un d at Sagat and Ch
one inscript inscription,
is kn ow n fr om two un dated st g ht h ce nt ur y. The Sagat a-maPa-
ei
oo ee
pa la eo gr ap hi ca lly to the mid- agap@ as “paramabhattarak
HB ae yi rs to Sankar
on a sc ul pted slab, refe , risdiction
ee ee e
n e nk ar ag an a, his territor ial ju Tripur!
J hive pan o epigraphs of
Sa tal at
th e fi nd spots of the tw r pa rt of Da ha la with its capi
eo over 4 majo
ea o have extended we com e
to Laksmanaraja
ly of
odern Te wa r) . ubordinate al
heir
,
fo ll ow e d by Kokalla (t
i stone in sc rl raj@ was
key Karitala
ng s of th e De ccan. Laksmana lacur! family to jmperi
astrakita ki known) W ho raised the Ka th e Tu ru s kas in Rajast
han,
ee dieiee is not defeated Rastra
tihara, Mihira Bhoja, his reign, vanquished
oe ee with the Pra
in the latter part of
ed east Bengal, and,
. A.D. 750-775)
850-890)
163
KALACU, RIS OF
c TRIPURT: MANDAPIKA SHRINES
Karitalai, temple
remains (Plate 32
italai ielded 2)
samialat has yiel ac akalpa Maharaja
ded a o i per-pltasat e insc ption of th
, datedria.
4/5, a number o AKalaoun , ina
e Ucc
scrie
afeudator p. 49
i s men pti
thee titime o bsketen e I dated a.p. 84
2,
th er i n s c ription 0 f
sman iaaa (c. ap 945-970) that re a n d B
fers to the foun a of a Varaha
ones from Di sa
the karn.
f at-roo
wo interest a Bandhdg f a type; a fe
illustrated ing archit ad w had simp
her ©. One ec tu ra l fragments le Latina
Patravalli shows the of eighth-ce
on all the linte} of a tury shrines fr
€ ornate ka gq
ti of a Ma as and With a Winge akha q
trig om Tife
gaaa
wa a ane
Y udgamas ndapika d Saruda
, with ty
pic
Shrine (Pla
te 3 ; the other eee
orned with ¢
Tee niches cr
n between, owne
Krishna Deva
165
KALACURIS OF TRIPURI:T MANDAPIKAA SHRINES
REFERENCES
}
Kalacuris, Delhi 1980.
Rahman Ali, Art and Architecture of the Arch aeol ogic al Survey of
Their Monuments,” Memoirs of the
uri and
R.D. Banerji, “The Haihayas of Trip
India , no. 23, Calc utta 1931. XXI, Galette ee "
ingh am, Arch aeol ogic al Surv ey of India Reports, IX, Calcutta 1875; In ;
A. Cunn pus Inscriptionum
the Kalachuri-Chedi Era (Cor
V.V. Mirashi, Inscriptions of ; ead t f
(1953),
Ootacamund 1955.
Saug or Insc ript ion of Sank arag ana, Epigraphia Indica XXX
ar, “Epi grap hica l Note s:
D.C. Sirc
46-51. i : ; ao
1968.
P.N. Srivastav, Jabalpur District Gazetteer, Bhopal Styl e, Arti bus Asiae XLII (1981-8 )
Regi onal
Chand and a Central Indian
Donald M.Mae es
129-152.
jee
166
I. Maitrakas
Guhaséna
(a.D. 555-570)
Dharaséna II
(A.D. 570-595)
Cakravarti Dharasén
a IV
(A.D. 644-648)
d. Bhipa
Siladitya 1
Kharagraha Il al
ias
Dharmaditya Dhruvaséna
Il, Garulaka
s
Rajasthaniya
Stra |
Sénapati Va
rahadasa
I
Maharaja Stra
Ty
Varahadaga
vif
{A.p, 549)
Sithhaditya
{a.n, 574)
II.C.1.a.
cHAPTER 14
Varieties
I ndian style: Surastra styl
of North Indi
Caveat
pre-Nagara phase, c. late sixth to lie
century A.D.
of
Maitrakas of Valabhi and Garulakas
Western Surastra
Historical Introduction
e four disciples
. n “Maitraka” may derive from Mitra, one of th
TTa ; appell at io hird century
nd ce nt ur y a.p .). In the Manu-Smrti (c. second-t
en vate Me early se co ayantikosa
cas te, the Vra tya -Va isyas, and in the Vaij
ey to im pl y a e Buddhist
ener co mm un it y co nducting rit uals in th
.), a pri est ly Maitrakas
Galtyfas: ieee aah A.D the lat ter hal f of the fifth century 4.D. the
r their origin, by coast of
aa ec cit y 0 f Va la bh i, near the eastern
the
Sie ished themselves as rulers at
stra. have been a
“ % the fir st Ma it ra ka dynas t, seems to
Séna pa ti (Bhata rk a) , cedo m from a
Gcleeeeal Ee d in Surastra. He is said to have secure d his prin
atione governor at
Pana Pai rna dat ta (a. p. 453); the Gupta
ecture d to be date by
Gikinagara pean conj gu pt a. H.G . Sha str i has sugges ted that the
e Skanda the
arity Bape es: ee m was ©. 4-D - 468 , sO on after at
dependent princedo hand, argues that a copper- pl
e
da un de d an in
death of Skan ee : el ai ne Saka 380/a.D. 458, is early as
genuine
charter of Guilmassn a, % el sooccvere abig n tit les an d dat ed
and places Ki eh earing es a te s as suming that Bhatarka’s rul rther evidence.
e began as
a pr dee Se en ae a pi tion by fu
would still need confirma brothers,
Bhatarka’s eldest Pera pati Dharaséna I, was followed by his three the
Drénasithha, Dhruvasé
n : éna
a is sai d to have received
as it ih
d Dharapatta. Dron dhagupta o” Vainyagupta), sign y- if
fr om a Gi , an
title “mah ar aj
vat
a”
ion of th up ta em pe ro r mo(pnarorcbahiblcay lBustatus; the ear liest of Dronasimha’s
=ingclthe
epee
ele ‘8 e Maitrakas to g s continued to
an d is dat ed a.p. 502. The ‘Maitraka kin
uses the Gu pt a Era lves “mahasa-
the i me ti me , calling themse ent vassal
acknowledge so
onally held by promin
Saa r fo r
h a e ae ee aé ab da ,” co nv en ti
manta” | iaid, ah
chieftains in ancient Drénasiti ha, suffered a defeat at the
ja Dh ru va sé na I, who succeeded as that of
Mahara in nor thern India
po we r Sp ee d
, whos e . 5 34-536, how-
sae : the P e n [sAnavarma
| de cl in ed . Be tw een his campaigns of A.D
at e Rage to follow
bc
s the on ly Ma it raka mona rch
hi ition.
s fposPar He wa a. He gave dona tions to Brahmins
ha t = ili
g zed
him sel ama -Bh agavat
th e cultIt of of Visnu, callin
Surastra style, pre-Nagara, II.C.1.a.
saw
PAANpong
expen’ © (@ PEARS
(eaeSen-ead ) soydweg eyeaareN ©
sones ynd yoo" 8
Dyrervtr
2984
VOHWVIA
OF mndAvVHAVN
@
-— ©
wget
ga!
@
fo}
@
eueytled!
YIRUNV
S|
-vyudgisvuanas
y UENCE
168
MAIT! RAKAS OF VALABHI T AND A
GARULAKAS OF WESTERN SURASTRA
169
Garulakas
The Garulaka chieftains,
vassals of the Mai trakas, ruled
capital possibly was Phamka- in western Surastra;
5 ; their
Prasravana (which, if read as .
be Jhinjhuri-jhar near Dhank) _ eS aan ; could
. Alternatively, it might
of their rule survive. hav e been at Gop.
The Garulak a dynasty ap
parently began with St Oo
law?) of Sénapati Bhat ra, a oi“rs ajasthan
An]
iya” ? (brother-in-
arka. He was given the
Chieftains were called Bhatarka-vihara at Valabhi.i The arulaka
Garu
“Garudaka,” fro
m @
es arnatadésa quite
Must therefore “re, Weatherworn, and certain; most of
alvism was
the Predominent re ma in somewhat te th e ch ro no logical discus-
large number Te li gi on nt at iv e.
Ujarat in fact f the extant temples ofthe of the Populati
on in this
had ev en ea rl Ma it raka period pe
yi Prabhasa Prob ie r Sa iv ite °stablishments we re dedicated riod, a very
arma, a Saivite ab ly wa fo ; the celebrated to Siva, and
Pa tr ia rc h unded at th te mp le
8€cond cent who lourish, e beginni of Soma-
mai AD Wie bene ed be fo re
ng of the Christian
Er a
Kayavatara (Karvan, Ne Pa triarc La ky 16a. Lakuliga (c. fir by Soma
©. second-fou ar, Vadodara)ofj Pa“d
ieneee
g aa st half of the
iy h one rnStivis ™, was born at Kaya
vadtie ee M southe Gu vardhana or
is to have jarat. Some of the Ks
eae Re een Worshipper at rapa
ar P abhasa,
See 6 .ite, s of Rudr kings
a and
Plate chart, r ‘eaee reek
“phd cu t ca ve s a
“OPper-plate ere Called Pa ee
ranted to Ts issued } ra ma -M ah egvara” in
“m : fi gu re of th ei r copper-
emple found Y le; it was issued } rshi Nandi. Of the very large number
Idi “lerinatha in 4 il e rowever, of
Dhruvesa ca ll On ly
Dharms itya in A.onD,e was prety
-
Valabhy t iwhick : refers tong riety St@bad 609 to a Siva
| v4 ‘ch i ra in urastra. A copper
"SVara-tataka
* ancien plt
| 'stence of a
nd dis brSaiti
; -plate Ke 9
n gmpl ci g
e, N Ro as
ou ts
moder np h e
To
m the old Tu shr ine s in
ins of the ci
ty
171
MAITRAKA S OF VALABHI 1 AND A
GARULAKAS OF WESTERN SURASTRA
ft. From
corresponding Nandi measures 6 by 4
exist; one linga is 6 ft. 3 in. high; the s or even earlier
Saiva temples of Maitraka time
these, it can be inferred that several
existed in Valabhi. the begin-
in Gujarat in Maitraka times. At
Sakti worship was also fairly preva lent hi-
sixt h cent ury, Dro nas imh a gave gra nts to temples of Kottammahika (Ma
ning of the -Ksémank ari) in Trisangamaka
vil-
a or Ambika
samardini) and Pandurarya (Ksémary aladitya in
ated in Hast avap ura- ahar anl that were renewed by Dhruvaséna-B hradésa
lage situ s to Svab
A.D. 639 and the Padmapurana (c. seventh-eighth century A.D.) refer
urarya.
area betw een the Saba rmat i and Mahi rivers) as the tirtha of Pandthe early
(probably the inued until
(The worship of Ksémankari the and the building of her temples contA copp er-plate grant of
adjoining tracts of Rajastha n.)
11th century in Gujarat and the
“Dév i-ks étra ” in Vata pall ika- sthali in Surastra, implying
Dhruvaséna II refers to century; 4 charter by Dhru-
godd ess temp le there in the early seventh
existenc e of a in Surastra.
to a temp le of Samkarika at Siravatanaka-sthali
vasé na III refe rs ksétra” in Mada-
cha rte rs (.D . 675 ) mentions a “matrsthana-
One of Siladitya III’ s temples at Sri-
n set of Sap tam atrkas at Bilegvara, Matrka
sara-sthali, and a mu ch wor turies from
and mat rka fig ure s of the seventh and eighth cen
nagar, Borica, and Pata, the popularity of the Saptam
atrkas.
ara t att est als o to ble from the late
worship in Gujarat is availa
northe rn Guj
isnava)
Evidence for Bhagavata (Va A few early heads of Vasudéva |
.
fourth or early fifth century A.D the
ta (a.D. 455)
Gupta emperor Skandagup in the Giri-
dh ins cri pti on of
several sites; the Junaga ernor had built a temple to
Cakrabhrt (Visnu)
records that the local gov self “Parama-
Mai tra ka rul er, Dhruvasena I, called him !
nagara environs. Only
one No grant toa
chi eft ain s als o used the same epithet.
ulaka vas sal sudana in
Bhagavata,” but the Gar lig ht fro m thi s per iod, but images of Kégini
Bhagavata temple has yet
com e to nk, Vigvaripa from
xth century), Balarama and Visnu in Dha tem-
Valabhi, Visnu in Gop (si th cen tur y), and the survival of a Dagavatara
umli (seven at Ghumli and Pindara
Kathalal, Visnu from Gh s in the Sonkansari group
ple at Kadvar and Vai
sna va tem ple the Bhagavata cult.
to the flourishing state of
tur y A.D .) att est ple at Dvaraka
famous Dvarakadhiéa tem onged to the
cen
(both of the seventh par ts of the
sur viv ing ures may have bel
(Although the oldest one of the preceding struct
12t h cen tur y, ’
date from the
Maitraka period.) es en te d in the Ma itraka period. Only
the Sun god, also was repr " but temples
The cult of Aditya, hi ms el f “P ar ama-Aditya-bhakta,
Dharapatta, cal led mple to the
one Maitraka king, er of pl ac es in Maitraka times. A te
built in a nu mb grant
sacred to Surya were gra nt of Sil adi tya I in A.D. 611. Another
is recorded by a ra. Sun temples at
Sun in Bhadréniyaka te mp le at Vatapadra in Surast to the
l and other sites attest
ecte d to a Su n
refers to a vapi conn d images from Mangro
a, etc. an also existed at
Kindarkhéda, Pasnavadraka times. A temple of the Sun (“Bakuladitya”,) fo unded in the
Sun cult in early Mait as ent medieval temple ma
the name Bhagvadgra
pl ac e
Modhéra, pr obably at the same dhéra had earned
ly se venth century A-D- Mo mple.
cause of its famous te
lat e six th or ear
on wa rd be Maitraka—
from the seventh ce nt ur y
ce nt ur ie s pri or to the beginning of
t begins seve ra l d northern
Buddhism in Gujara d mo na st ic re mains in Surastra an
caves, stupas , an
t tot he importan
ce of Buddh-
rule. A number of l re fe re nc es , att es
ry and inscriptiona uent periods.
Gujarat, plus litera ug h th e Ksatrapa and subseq ala
ism from the first ce
ntur y B.C . th ro
a Ma ha vi ha ra ne ar Valabhi by Arhat Ac
to the founding of (founder of the
Hsiian Tsang refers sciple of
in which lived Acaéry
a Bh Bhadanta Gunamatt, di
of Ma hayan
Yogacara school
172
Zave q fant
toaB uddh
ist hunn,
Buddhi ery at Ku €ranag hava chieftain,
Student came st Ist viyiha n; ra Ahivarma II,
, as to the s near Valabhi became ara in C.
AD. 723,
“sttoyed great University Ce
Buddhism
this Breat Buddhi at Nalanda ntres of great learning alt
Start, decl University, in Magadha. to whic
inj along with On ly Arab invasion
Owever, Gujarat fr the city of s
RO grant to om the
later Part Va la bh i, in a.p.
a e ddhist Monast of 78 8
oth also Su 2° Both Br
ffered fro
e SUIVives from the seventh century,
o ee m ¢ anis m and Jainis
Vastating m gain any of the
ma —e
Aourich Arab inva ed Strength in this Peri last four
sions od, though
Tjayanta (Gi Tastra fro
a8 early as t
Century 4 5 rma ; “a Jain he third c
Tedaction f * C e n t u r y b e f S l F entury .c
th, , l
th ves wer e tea .;
as had4 e x C avated in Ju Be
na on
ved Valab e haeHe Maitraka dynagadh in thwe istecoe
m
hy s ty, a synod na
™ Valabhi f o r the
16 in under Tya
0 Wa s presided Over Na ga rj un a (c
ed a by
gion. dina c aiet aitraka monarch Dévarddhigani
e na ce eb
Ontiff rities an Dronasirnha I.
important
®t, did religious
no accept grants
from
173
ST
MAITRAKA: S OF VA LABHI I AND A
GARULAKAS OF WESTERN SURASTRA
tone at
a traka kingdom
——__[
ie: tees
o
Canari
————SS——
So a
an ==
aID@IG
iE aX —
)
= pe
A AA
= = —_ ty) WF)
Af) |
iat =|, —S
snadon
a inn ss
p =
od
wi fi=|
‘a
175
MAITRAKAS OF V. 'ALABHI T AND GAA RULAKAS OF WESTERN SURASTRA
b oF.
esy: Department
a.jagatt; b. pitha. (Court
uldings:
Fig. 70. Gép. Old temple, moarat State.)
gy: Guj
of Archaeolo
7
.1.a-
Surastra style, pre-Nagara, I1.C
reac
ae
‘ae
—_
ie
(-aze7g yere(n5 ‘AZoTOoeyIIV
re}
eIeNbS “IeseULIG ‘( feydure, eAmg redeuLg | fepdu
| jo queunredeq :Aseyinoy) ‘eydure } BAIS 3 fordure} (IgeAey) ‘epearus
ed cs
guiiyyy
PeuUeluy “repepO ‘y ‘g ‘ou e[duray, ‘ereas
| p-eyyUe, S$) etdure; PIO “BPEABSIA “P
‘e[dure} rurseAeAYpUtA ‘reseulig “8 ‘(unze A “IEAPEN e
eATIG “preAselig “4 seydure} NUST
‘[ ‘ou efduey, ‘preseueyg “9 ‘efdure, eYyyeu segird adura; eyenrey TZ ‘SLT
bo]i oO
ST il
MAT IRAKA: S OF VA LABHI A
AND GARULAKAS OF WESTERN SURASTRA
b Cc
F.|L0
i
Hike a Gham athedhas;
swe Sates“
na temple no. .
1, exerior wiall, ved
ibandha;
. a. Sun temple, garb
antag, Departme hagrha ell),
nt of Archaeology, ;
Gujarat State.)
temple was by
means of a large
had ag ir ma’ avarana-enclos low platfo rm on the
from whi way w u re wit h seats for
‘th
Sappeared , but Ch a second §tair opposed flights 0 f steps
devotees. The r ear
led to & top meeting at a com mon
7 wOuldings
8. 68). Smal] ™Mo that of € ja ,
ttava onstones lead s Urvive (Plate 329) are gati. This eeeeigs aas
rana- in g to he step similar to Sa
iscovered du s and tw ne is
ring ¢ ®aranc o larger ones
© Doses no pr e (Fig. 75),
© of Ganéga, ile gana fj,
itha, ag We U m a , a n d §
ll ag
Nee of a linga
© make now oe in
8€ in the horthwest the temple ae dto
ong w i corner as Rama
Visnu filled
€se 11 niches.)
179
MAITRAKAS OF VALABHI T AND GARULAKAS
A OF WESTERN SURASTRA
nea e Fa cs ew
examen NE
RACI
a;
Fig. 73. Pithas: imesvara. Temp le no. 1, Nandi-pithikGujarat
(Courtesy: Vora); b. Kh ment of Archaeology,
a. Dérvav. Old temple a. (Co urt esy : Dep art
no. 3, Nandi-pithik
c. Khiméévara. Temple
State.)
seventh century
ed from the fifth to the
Estimates of Gop’s
dat e ha ve ra ng rter of the sixth
an d Dh ak y ha d fir st suggested the last qua would suggest
navati ka caves by Spink
(Sankalia; Barrett). Na on the chronology of Vakata a, laguna, an
century, but rec ent wo rk
-K al ac ur i fea tur es at Gop (particularly gan 525-550. The
d Maurya ¢. A-D -
that the Vakataka an rrant a date for the Gop temple between temples (“‘anéka-
wo ul d wa lt ma ny
culika forms) 54 9 tha t he had bui
Varahadasa II in A.D . -a-vis many other
claim of Garulaka te mp le, in particular, vis
be overlook ed ; the Go p le and general
dévakula”) cannot od in Sur ast ra, im presses one in its sca
itraka peri
buildings of the Ma in ornamental
pretensions as a roy al foundation. as yet undeciphered letters
bea rs a fe w the temple is
’s cella but their bearing on
A slab in the temple 600 (Pl ate 333 ),
later than a.p.
Brahmi script not
not clear.
180 agara, I1.C.1.2-
Surastra style, pre-Nag
j peels ke
vimana, first
tala: b. Khiméévara. Templeno.1;
> d. Bilaesgy ara. Bilvanatha, c. Bilé
ilésvara.
Mple no. 1, first tala; f. vimana, thirdtala; : e. G humli
Bilas a. Bilvanatha, vimana, fourth
0.3, firsttala; h. ae
Pind
j. Biléévara, Bi ‘indara. Old tem ple, second tala; i. are
lv anatha, fifth tala; k,
ta
a. (Courtesy: Dep Bhanasara. Raye
artment of Archaeology,
Gujarat State.
—
with Square
giidh
e featureless
0 uter wall is amandapa and an unusual mukh a-
a
original dandacchadya are still int Sea val en ores ari ei
fe ima ge of a n a ae
335) ene hav e hel d ps have been
ow s fou r, pla in, Ru caka pillars; added pro
rie :ae ofee
hall sh At the centre of the
north and south (Plate 337). ana
reas as ee the pillars on the -n ic he s to pp ed by a three-level Pharns
at ta ka
ee sou walls are empty kh pil ast ers at the entrance show ku
mara-
(Plate 337 ). Th e
$araséna on the front the
both
capitals.
missing at Gop, is quite clear here, in place of
roofing, were used in
The method of interior dapa. Stone beams and joists
reas and gud ham an toward the outer wall
the aisles, these slope
e slabs; over
er, covered over by ston
(Plate 337). an inner ratnasakha
decorated doorframe showing with
has a partially a plain stambhasakha
ae dese garbhagrha of Ganga and Yamuna at the bottom, a co mp le te-
slender figures na ka to pp ed by pl ai n tatika and bharana, T he uttar-
rounded and strong ly curved lagu ed bahyasakha.
qua rte r ro un d pa dm asakha, and an uncarv Visnu, Sankara,
ly plain sakha, a (Surya), Viranci, the
hes sheltering Aditya m in the centre of
ae ee five katakara-nic th Ga ne sa ab ov e hi
s at the lalata, wi
andra; Visnu appear the northern
saubhagyapatta. eles s. In si de th e garbhagtha, near
framed by a
ga rb ha gt ha walls are featur wo rs hi p; it now is en
Di still un de r y Maitraka
at p e a image of Varaha, ments of an older parikara, of earl
arie en andapa
p i a e 11 th century A.D. Frag mb s, ar e ce me nt ed to the mukham
eae snu on its ja
ing avataras of Vi larger image than the surviving Varaha the decorative
.
pillar ed for a form of
s but were intend sanéa-tiers, the
size and cora-
rm of th e te mp le ’s Ph am
tt er ns , pi th a, and doorway de
The fo s, jala pa -600.
and the kumara figure than Gop, c. A.D. 575
eueee the Varaha date for this temple afew decades later
n would warrant a Plates 340-345)
a tem ple (Fi gs. 71b , 74a, c-d, f, j, 76;
Biléévara, Bilvan ath eau within
ast of Po rb andar on a plat
is located 16 miles nor the r, which
ont hamlet of Bileévara wes t ba nk of th e Bilvaganga rive
ple is placed near the
e Barada hills; the tem around the
lows through a deep gor ge. are , wit h a wide pradaksina
squ The ex-
: te mp le is sandhara, almost com pos ite shafts (Fig- 76).
ay hav ing which
, its wal ls rel ieved by pilasters lar s (Fi g. 76; Plates 342, 344)
—————
ee hagrha raka pil shows a
pu nc tu at ed by engaged Mié api tal s. The east fagade now
h or wall is of their roll-c
below the block 340).
ave amalakas set pr ov id ed in the 17th century (Plate i ortions one
om s
pair of balconied ro at Ka dv ar (Fi g. 71a-b),
is topped by a
resembles that
The pitha exactly the Varaha temple. The architrave © be ancient to the pattika
and a half times th
at of ll above might
d a ka po ta (Plate 344). The wa
row of dent il s an er renovators. aves
th e fi na l 2 ft. se ems the work of lat ha, pulled toward the west, le
course, but th e ga rb ha gr ns tr uc ti on.
r mandapa, but red by timber co
There is no regula at its front. The ambulatory is cove ted “svayambhu” linga
some room for as
sembly partly mutila
co nt ai ns a huge, amorphous, e now covered
over by tiles.
Th e ga rb ha gr ha do or wa ys ar of six talas
main
on th e living rock. The or ts 4 lo fty superstructure
supp or te d de; it su pp 1. Each tala is
is 92 ft. high insi 7, 5, 4, 3, 2, and
The garbhagrha eir faces in th e or de r of
rger variety ©
a-dormers on th d a mi nor kapota. A la
ca rr y ga va ks de nt il s, an talas reflect
that
te d by ka nt ha -p atti, @ course of Su ra st ra : th os e fo r the first three
replaces
suppor
is us ed he re than elsewhere in Pl at es 34 1- 34 2 ); the fourth tala
karnakit as (Fig. 74a, © d;
or “kata” form
a usual “vimana”
I1.C.1.a-
182 Surastra style, pre-Nagara,
Bee 5 Lc
Zé
cv
Lay
y
ed
ry
if
bé3
1
‘
ie
a
-
7 S
e
S
>|
uo
hy
17
ast?
-------?
ae Fae \. arg
€------
183
MAITRAKAS O F VALABHI iTAND GARULAKAS
A OF WESTERN SURASTRA
15 20
5 10
FE 0
. (After Cousens.)
atha temple, plan
Fig. 76. Bilésvara. Bilvan
Naagara , 1.C.1.4-
184 Surastra style, pre-
La}
"a. Temple no
. 5; —tN
b, Khimag
p artment of Archaeolo paki emple no, 2:
8Y, j
Gujarat State.) *- : Bale}.6). Pitha
Pi dmata
ata temp le.
185
A OF WESTERN SURASTRA
MAIT: RAKAS OF VALABHI I AND GARUL AKAS
In
re are
va rieties), and Valabhi. The
for ms: Vi ma na , Kuta (in at least two is muc h rui ned . A
akara
superstructural
d we st of the co mpound, but the pr iti ona l inte rest
pratolis to the east an
st tem ple-structures,
lends add
wi th the ear lie
matha, contemporaneo us
1, the Khimesvara
to the ensemble. the Kh im eé sv ar a group is templ e no.
The principal bui Idin g of
ce 0 f Porbandar of the
17th century). The
a Jé th va pr in
Mahadéva temple (name
d aft er (Fig. 78a), the
pl e is sa nd ha ra , with a rectangular plan dapa
west-facing Khiméésvara
tem
fr om the pra dak sin apatha. Even the mukhaman
entiated wall and doorway.
gidhamandapa un differ the gadhamandapa b y a
sep ara ted fr om plain walls have venti-
is coterminous, an d recently renova ted. The
The adhisthana is fea tur ele ss south of the gudha-
d jal as, tw o each on the north and
lating holes filled wit h per for ate sina (Fig. 78a). Among
o on th e east wa ll in the pradak
mandapa and garbhagrh
a an d tw pair of c rudely made
on e on the south wall has a w
the original jalas that those in the north wall sho
pattika. Abo ve
eight-pointed stars wi the wa the normal dentils and a
kunjaraksa pat ter n. At th e to p of
, and kapotapal ika wit h some of the
a pa tt ik a, kan tha
rmed by
this is a low parape t fo
sur viv ing .
ancient pranalas
Surastra st y le, pre = Nagara, ILC. 1.a.
én pach na at beehie
The pillars at the front of the mukhamandapa have a Siirasé vel
mee robe
above; karnakiitas (the roofs now lost) stand at the corners. (There
a Mee ae
similar karnakitas at the rear end of the temple.) The E
A ie a
Rucaka; those inside the gudhamandapa ae square bases
and octagona
i tunted, being only 7.5 ft. high.
Macc. doit isplain save for worn
figures at the top. The udumbara
shows a circular projecting mandaraka flanked by
vigorous grasamukhas. se
The garbhagrha’s antarabhitti is punctuated by engaged
a square-to-octagonal shaft, and an upper amalaka.
colu mns show ing a ,
The linga inside the sanctum may
be old.
The catustala vimanakara superstructure
of the garbhagrha has grooved gavaksas
in sequence on each storey (Plate 346). Full
-blown lotuses fill the gadha-cavities on
the south. Karnakitas with sikha-finials
(Fig. 74b) occur on three talas (Plate
usual, dentils, kantha, pattika, and kapé 346). As
ta also occur. The final tala is formed
shapely kapéta; a short griva then supp by a very
orts a handsome, bulbous, and stro
amalaka (Plate 346). ngly fluted
The temple stylistically sho
uld d
moulded Nandi-pithika in
front of the t
isitesite era I
grasapatti below. Thisis isi the earlies
iest known example of grasap
asapatti
ie St On the kapota below, a lavishly ornamented BONS ate in
Rei cuto:
ibly Kubéra (Plate 358). giraséna bears
The corners of the exterior walling , BeaniThe
were crowned by large meee
square garbhagrha inside, surrounded oe
by an ample pradaksina, has p
for vandanamalika and padma
below
paficatala superstructure is
dentil course, minor kapot
The sikhas of the
, Show Siraséna-pattern.
perstructure is a shallow the front of the su-
Sukanasa (Plate 355) with a lower
Siiraséna, panel crowned by a
The temple possesses more .
ornament than earlier structures
Ornament is more of the same class;
detail, ed, richer, an
building continues d of an advanced type.
to follow the older While typologically the
advances,
ure without a
but are new in Surast at Nacna and Bhumara in Central series of cornices. Such kitas
ra, Seemingly more India
imitation of ear
lier forms. a result of a proces in the late fifth century
s of condensation
he su Perstructure than of
Pilasters, howeve otherwise resemble
r, appe s Bhanasara no. 1
he temple Seem ar in the ntha, (Plate 349). Mini
s ab out a 8enerati ature
sed above on earlier than
the Sénkansari building dis
Pindara, old cus-
temple (Fig.
74h; Plate 36
The same 2)
form (Plate
- The temple’
gavaksas ab
2,
8avaks as in the order of 5, 4,
rch in front of the 3,
temple; the
;
P am uk ha ; the fou rth tal a has pil asters (Plate 366). Each
the e thithi rd tala at places has gras
s with amalakas.
tala has kita platform is twice as large as the garbhagrha; it has rectangular bha
dra-
ike eee large gavaksas.
ka pilasters and crowned by
n e au ed by Ru ca transitional toward
Dh ré va d in di ca te a condensation of forms quarter of
Hei al ngara an d to date before the third
Surastra. Neither seems
mulation of Latina in
the seventh century A.D.
)
Srinagar, Sirya tempihle? (Fig 71 ar, san dhara structure c. 50 ft.
long and 26 ft.
: rec tan gul
Thi
ato sree shrine is a lar ge, hall have disappeared.
is c. 15 ft. square . The ambulatory and tika are
Kasar the garbhagrha and a hea vy vrt ta cip pika below the upper pat early
da
nae eee above kumu there above the kandhara, as in all instances of thi
s
eatures. Den til s are
class. ed, ribbed amalakas.
sup ers tru ctu re h as ka rn ak it as wi th ball-shap mber is a
a The catustala very large. The crowning me
the final tier left plain ) are
f e gavaksas (3,2,1,
figures, an
lutted culika.
ed ha lf -d ia mon ds and standing
doorsill has in de nt old. The
ti The garbhagrha a (mo ons ton e) is se t before the thresh
andr
aD decoration. An ardhac 1947, when a porch was
a dded.
ren ova ted bef ore
ple was carefully
temple (Figs. 71e, 78b)
Srinagar, Vindhyavasini ly smaller than
aci ng Siv a temple. It is slight
aethe west of the village sta nds this wes t-f jadyakumbha
rep lac es a jaga ti-P lin th by a pri mitive
e preceding temple. The pit ha
and inverted cyma recta. a has four, plain,
a squ are garbhagrtha. The mandap
Ru bat temple is san
dha ra, wit h walls (Fig. 78b).
six pila ster s on the northern and southernthe case of Khimés-
Th a pillars and hamandapa as in
also to include a muk mandaraka. The
projecting grasamukha and
he late ral wal ls ext end
the udu mba ra wit h lowing the origin-
vara no. 1. New is hav e been reconstructed fol
ambulatory walls and the sup ers tru ctu re as those of the Sun
sup ers tru ctu re are almost the same
al pattern. The elemen
ts of the temple no. 1.
s were probab ly contemporary with Miyani
temple. Both Srinagar temple
8-369, 394)
ta te mp le (Fig. 77¢ Plates 36 utheast of
Bal éj, Pi th ad ma
of na th a, is about 26 miles so
its late Jaina te mp le Pa rg va
group of three old te
mples, of
Baléj, famous for mp le sta nd s a
rth of the Jaina te
Porbandar. To the no . aksina, gudha-
r ow prad
which this is the best preserved mi laprasada with nar ouldings
lls have no base-m th tier of
of a sa nd ha ra
The temple consists g. 77¢ ). Th e ou te r wa
khamandapa (Fipo ate 368). The four
mandapa, and mu th e ka ta pa lika at the top (Pl potapalikas,
but have large dent
ils be lo w
th re e lo we r tiers are steep ka
ged. Th e dly placed
the catustala supe
rstructure is dama
be tw ee n tie rs. Gavaksas are broa
es
, with tall recess
oo karnakitas is astylar
824) joined wi th the prasada,
r gi dh am an da pa, transversely 77 °) : The garbhagrha
also has
Th e re ct an gu la n wa ll (Fi g.
e easter
of pilasters on th
except for a pair y. with paired
s flanking its plain doorwa
pilaster (Plate s 369, 394), on e of them
mu kh am an da pa has Rucaka pillars in rude imitation 0 f the Vakataka pilas-
Th e een,
th a floral band betw
floral medallions wi
ters at Ajanta.
190
Surastra style, pre-Nagara,
——
ERea
se
Saar
Miyani, temple no
. 2 (Plate 367)
To the right of temp
—==—
—
le no,
building with dentils n Harsadmata temp
: at the top of the walls le, is a small cu
and tather sparsely and tritala superstruc
placed gavaksas. ture with kapota-tbiiecal
“Towni ng amalaka no The re cess rs
lon
»@ subu
Cal prasa
191
A ST RA
MAITRAKA;: S OF
A OF WESTERN SURAST
VALAB HI AND GARULAKAS
por
: € with kapotapali-tiersch, has a kap6ta at the top of the wall que3
‘0P Pair show c alternating with min
aksas. The crowning slab, or kap6tas; only t }
candrika, and kalasa
aie
with a semi-o
pen mukham
an-
ver an unmoulde
d
193
MAITRAKAS R
OF VALABHI I AND GARULAKAS O| F WESTERN SURAA a
is covered by slant-
da ma ge d and wit hou t a fini al. The ambulatory d grilles on no
aire now s; the exterior is pla in exce
pt for blin
four-
we joists supporting roof-slab thin beaded circles,
w lotuses, half an d full, wi
south (Plate 383). These sho
erstices. sana
ie flowers filling the int aka pillars. The mandap a has an oblong Pham nth
nside are four, plain, Ruc se ve
dates to the middle of
the
probably
pent-roofA.D.(Plate
381
). The temple
century
)
temple no. 8 (Plate 384 mple has an
Ghumli, Sénkansari, this nirandhara te its astylar
d tem ple s at Son kan sar i, an d
Imeine west-facing group of ed by the prasada
wal l are sha r
both pit ha and da, kantha,
ong bichambered plan; a bh it ta (ja ga ti) and has kumu
384). The pitha res ts on band, plain
goammendape (Plate is to pp ed by vandanamalika
The prasada wa ll perstruc-
apota mouldings. sa da ta la or pr ob ab ly once saptatala su
e
ntha, and starts th owning amalasaraka
is missing.
Pee kapota, ka e cr from
re, its tiers separate
d by ka nt ha s. Th
of , th e tie rs on ly vaguely separated
has a four-tiered ro the west front shows three gavaks
a-
egu dh am an da pa
Seat H e prasada’s spir
abut th
e;
q other. These
a mahanasi.
ormers, the upper one sh ow s beautiful corbelling
.
ri or of th e ha ll
The inte
temple (Plate 385)
Khapat, Camundamata at Kindarkheda,
san dha ra pla n is mu ch like that of the Sun templemandapa-windows
ae temple's tureless upapitha,
sli ght ly bro ade r. The temple has a fea im it
two free-
ive kaksasan as andwith blocks
ough with he av y, pr hall
a mukhamandapa b ulatory and
without grilles, and two-tiered roofing over the am
standing pillars, ksa- dormers. kapotas
intended to be carved with gava ka po ta pa li s with minor
ree st ee p llars with
su pe rs tr uc tu re alternates th e int eri or ar e four Rucaka pi
(Pl Th e rn. On th
late 385). The up per portion is mode ple is east-facing.
wes t. Th e tem
pilasters on the east and
temple (not illustrated) andapa. The
Chaya, Afjanimata
éd a an d Kh ap at but lacks a mukham al ignment. The
is pl an ne d li ke Kindarkh e pi ll ar s in si de are out of
This temple lls have collapse
d and th The plain
north and west wa es se nt ia ll y li ke that at Kindarkheda.
has a superstructure
socare garbhagrha orway has a dandacchadya.
giidhamandapa do
ate 386) into
Bhanvad, Indrésvara (Pl le has bha dra -pr oject ions
that extend
midd le of the
this temp date from the
dis tan ce out side Bhanvad, te mp le ma y al ak a is
Some gh the A small origin
al am
ica tal a sup ers tructure. Thou are mu ch lat er.
the paf niches
the bhadra
seventh century, o a later addition.
am al as ar ak a. The porch is als
er
crowned by a lat rated)
te mp le no. 5 (not illust e the doorway;
Odadar, Gorakh
ma th a
si x, la rg e, sq uare holes abov ses a tritala
a ga rb ha gr ha without a porch; the plain pattika and kapota ri
This is just had one. Abov
e
ve r, hi nt to its having ka po ta pa likas;
ho we
uc tu re co mp os ed of large p erstructure
is crowne
superstr rvat ur e. Th e su
a sense of cu
gives the temple
amalaka.
194
a a, I .C.1.4.
Surastra style, pre-Nagar
north-facing shrine ha
the prasada has a lar s
ge, bold Slraséna,
and kantha at the top
gavaksas at the ends » a skandha-védi (“Sabhakara sikhara’”) and a Valabhi ; roof w ith
(Plate 388).
The gudhamandapa
flanked by large Si has doors on the
rasén as (Plate 389), north and east. The garbhagrha-door is
Its northerly orientatio
Suggests that the
temple w
with Valabhi Sikh
ara in w
haarnk,
Dh Jhity lani-v
s
artesapi ee(Jh ilani-vav) (Plates 401, 403-404)
in Western India. The older is Jhilani-
gh perhaps the oldest
Jharnk possesses two vapis,
Dha
of the Jaina caves. The
well is formed
to the sou thw est
By two miles west of the to wn Tw ornamental
o
ps des cen din g to the well proper.
y a narrow channel,
wit h ste ar cavity with
sti ng. Th e fir st (Plate 404) has a rectangul
attakas on the wall are
int ere lasSuna above
tw o ml ini atu re pilasters with square a second
with half-lotuses, and
ikara consists of
ieee the par gha ta an d pa dm a, pat ti
uncarved pattika, ribbed a kit a-r oof showing, first, a ka
pota with half-lotuses
padma. The pediment
si mu la te s nsana-roof (Plate
si ve two-tiered Phar
eae medall ion s, the n an imp res
The second niche is
eae
str ong ly rem ind one of the Gop temple.
ae 5gavaksa-dormers
asena (Plate 403). be placed
ne by an early type of strthe same date as the Gop temple, and may
ost of
The vapi seems alm
between c. A.D. 550-575.
ates 402, 405-407)
Dhank, Mavjusri-vapi (Pl second vapi, “T-shaped, also W ith niches on its
walls.
village is a o khattakas (Plate
ate the Dhank
dd le sec tio n of the step-wall, tw lani-vapi;
p descent in the
mi like those in the Jhi
aa come a stee a-pilasters, plain but still somewhat n (c. A-D- 636).
ih } ave parikarm the Ku su ma temple in Rajastha ).
ronglywitfle xured, as on owning gavaksa (Plate 405khattaka. Its
eovelagis is st
unaa gur asé na h pilasters below the cr ly embellished
Ab vapi is another, ful
e sa me ted lasuna,
at the top are flu
in g of th
On the first land patta was car ve d; an d in sakhas
hya pla
eet oe have pithas; the mad The khattaka itself is framed by three
(Pla te 407 ).
ghata, and bharana ternating
(Plate 407). by a fou r-t ier ed kut a with al
ure is crowne d vel in
A plain kapota entab lat ms late r tha n the two at a lo wer le d
ota tale (Plate 406). This khattaka see 675; the earlier niches ma y be date
been added c. A.D. ted
e same vapi. It may have and sir asé na sha pes at Kusuma, da
with the laguna
c. A.D. 625 by comparison te rn
OV er southwes
C. A.D. 636.
bui ldi ngs of thi s per iod scattered rs ta nd in g of
There are at least 20 other rm at io n to our un de
none rther info
contributes fu
Surastra, but
Surastra style.
Dhaky
M.P. Vora & M.A.
REFERENCES
1876.
and Kacch, London
ities of Kathi awad ta 1931.
James Burgess, Repo rt on the Antiqu m ples of Kat hia wad , Gal cut
H. Cousens, Somanat ha and Other Medieval Te
‘
R.C. Majumdar, “Northern India During a.p. 650-750,” The Classical “ Oo The
Age (History and Culture i
Indian People Ill), Bombay 1962, 147-152.
J.M. Nanavati and M.A. Dhaky, The Maitraka and the Saindhava : i iae
Supplementum XXVI), Ascona 1969.
Temples of Gujarat (Artibus As
B,J. Sandesara, Jaina Agama Sahitya-maf Gujarat
(Gujarati), Ahmedabad 1952.
H.D. Sankalia, The Archaeology of Gujarat,
Bombay 1941.
H.G. Shastri, Maitraka-Kalin Gujarat (Gujarati),
Pts. 1-2, Ahmedabad 1955.
H. G. Shastri,
“MaitrakaRajya (Pts. 2-4)” “Gujarat-no Rajakiya ané Sarskrtika Itihasa, vol. 3: Maitrak
ané Anu-Maitraka Kala (Gujarati), Ahmedab a
ad 1974, 6-73.
Manibhai Vora, Narottam Pala n, and Gosvami Mohanpuri, “Barda
Mandira” (Gujarati), Svddhydya, Pradésa-man trana Visésa Prak-Sol
8 (1971), 462-463. anki
ILC...
CHAPTER 15
stra style,
Varieties of North Indian style: ntSuhrato mid-eighth
early Nagara phase, c. late seve
century A.D.
Maitrakas of Valabhi
Valabhi
Genealogical Table: Maitrakas of
Siladitya Il
Siladitya Il
(c. A.D. 662-684)
Siladitya IV
(c. A.D. 685-710)
Siladitya V
(c. A.D. 710-735)
gukaccha
mana princess of Bhr
Siladitya VI = Caha
(c. A.D. 735-760)
VII
Dharaséna alias Siladitya
(c. A.D. 760-788)
had
Historical Introduction
A.D . 65 5- 66 0) , Sil adi tya Il (who until then g
Kharagraha III (c. bhi throne, mergin
EE
cS
Following the reign of ndhya-Sahya territory) ascended the Vala From this point on,
the Vi line of Valabhi.
been looking after branch with the main to
the collatera l Vi nd hy a- Sa hy a
la di ty a. ” Do na ti on s by Siladitya HI
i adopted the name
«j a, and Simhapura
are
all rulers of Valabh i, Khetak
and lan d-g ran ts to Brahmins of Valabh but soon passed int
o the
Buddhist vihara s a ti me wa s re ga in ed
accha territory for seems
known. The Bhrguk Da dd a, of Na ndiputt. Siladitya mha, of Nagasarika (Nava-
ar a ki ng , ya si
hands of the Gu rj
ce, Dharaésraya Ja i‘e.Vajrabhatta). In
fe at at th e ha nd s of the Calukya prin ng Vajjada or Vajrata
de s Ma it ra ka ki
a port-town of th
e
cord calls thi 4 ttacked Ghogha,
sari) (the Calukya re il is sa id to ha ve
neral Isma
A.D. 677, the Arab ge
.1.b.
198 Surastra style, early Nagara, 11.C
@KHAMBHALIYA
@JUNAGADH
199
MAITRAKAS OF VALABHI
un
thi s poi nt on, the dec lin e of Maitraka power had beg
Hoan kingdom. From
to survive for over a century.
ough the dynasty did manage 685-710) and his successor
, Siladitya V (A.D.
Sil adi tya IV (c. A.D. charters. The
ashe rules of bot h mon archs issued copper-plate forces under
), were uneven tfu l, tho ugh
eat a.p. 725/6 by Arab
of som e imp ort ance was the attack in Calukya armies
ngle eve nt
bei ng def eat ed and chased by the
of Sindh. Aft er of Nandi-
Jvee the governor Pul aké si and the allied Garjara prince
ni-janasr aya joined the
) Vagasarika under Ava passed by Valabhi and Siladitya V apparently
see the Arab attackers Indian princes.
efending confederation of
arat
clear that northern Guj
(c. A.D.735-760), it is
of Sil adi tya VI 758, the Muslim
at that time. In a.p.
rs
pea From the charte the Mai tra kas
sion of Valabhi, but the
ill was in the posses sen t Ama ru and a naval fleet to attack
Sindh,
governor, Hasham of
attempt was unsuccessful. the narration
rs , ga ve la nd -g rants to Brahmins. If
predec es so ntury A.D.)
Siladitya VII, like his la (c. se co nd qua rter of the 11th ce
poet Soddha and defeated
in the Udayasundarikatha of me in conflict with Dharmapala of Bengal cceeded in
monarch ca Arabs under Abdul
Malik su
a betrusted, this na va l at ta ck fr om my, the Mus-
im. In A.D. 766, a se
cond
st il en ce , wh ic h ki lled many of their ar Arabs from
but due to pe a prabandhas, the
aaah Valabhi, to late medieval Jain akkuka) of
aoe an ae retrea
t. (A cc or di ng
i tr ad es ma n, th e millionaire Kaku (K royed
vited by a Marvad abs completely dest
i ae been in Si la di ty a. ) In va di ng Ar
en persecuted by
alabhi, who had be s as
Valabhi in a.p. 788. ni sm we re su pp or ted by Maitraka king d
In this period, Br ahmins and Brahmibrated temple of Somanatha at Prabhasa ha
The cele e
ey as in earlier phases. ho we ve r, ce as ed to find patronage after th
India. Buddhism, by Jainism). Two
re amous all over y (it s pl ac e pe rh aps partially taken
seventh centur ni mahattara,
ast quarter of the ri sh ed du ri ng thi s epoch: Jinadasa ga Svetambara Jaina aga-
fl ou th e
great Jaina pontiffs . 660-700 and wrote commentaries on d Gan-
acti ve be tw ee n c. A.D
ra su tr a an d th e Nisithasuira, an rs at
he Anuyégadva s headquarte
Nandisutra, t probably had hi
mas such as the na (active c. A.D. 725-760), who exhaustive and voluminous com-
dhahasti Siddha a in north Gujarat and wrote an ti (c. fourth-fifth century A.D.).
sé
Patala an d Mo dh ér a of Umasva one
y In Sa ns kr it on the Tattvarthasutr pa rt of th e 13 th century, associate
mentar
ers, from ate leJa ast the early tions on the hills of Satrunjaya.
Medieval Jaina writng s wi th th ina construc ina worship.
of the Siladitya ki co nt in ue d to be a place of Ja
né mi , i Ambika
sacred to Jina Arista nas © onstructed a temple to Yaks
Ujjayanta (Girnar), éikhara, the Digambara Jai i
On the Amba
750-755.
some time between A.D.
In
.all oth nand
akas as se
emple no, 1
(Plate 409),
Owever, is su
S a Ph ase I buil
its Superstruc bstan.
© spacing be ilable; the to
and absorb tween tiers p courses an
ed in is le gs than j d crow
i-shaped Plank) € ti er s (b ut
; 4
i
na x ur, strongly
Cube, The marked, well-artic
ch7 = fe karn an
as of ea h tie T are 10dakas are fy tther
ulated bhi-
© wi
cova
rnic
kees
of th ap pl i dr aw
es e n in
Her of gi,anSénas;
d the ned on the face of each to e ach storey
th aksas an hale are
ines ie ya carried through the andaka’s basal
a losely inte horizontal striation of
8rated to form a central
as€nas ends
with a single
201
MAITRAKAS OF VALABHI
: |
— fan
(
V
— — @
B , C |
WN
AN ORY
ay
: of Archaeology,
Gujarat State.)
Surastra style, early NagA ara, II .C.1.b.
has here emerged, its outer lat as by shadow recesses. True Latina form
only defici
accuracy and cogency
of its articulation, this
The upper amalaka Sikhar.
(
ve it original, odd,
c
alasa may not be orig
inal. Inside the garb
consort. hagrha ar
The hall in front an
with gavaksas and d the surrounding
ambulatory are ro Arnsana tie
e eTrs
half-gavaksas Orga ofed by eR
later temples in Guja nized to suggest
a separate a
rat, however, these
tiers are integrated aaa
Akhédar, Surya directly with the
temple (Figs. 79b-
c: Plates 411-412)
éi
This sandhara te
mple (Fig, 79b),
ment parapet ab a little larger th
ove its an the Sutrapada tem
plai s. These end ple, has a prom-
avaksa-dormers (on the longePar ape t is formed
r si
: Plan
Ne Sikhara (Pla 4D6ta re} } : The wall is te for the first time in Sura
te 44 gg rminated stra
988. The ma hyal by gav ““Sa-dor ttika, plain bu,
offset but with at a ig me rg fi y Pa tt
lled by full-b ik t
out a flanked by pvalata formed by
a,
lown plfl
a
ow er s.
da net an large, interpen
et
®pression d outer vénuk6éa, both rating, gavak-
between,
The Si progressively
khara seem
ingly was
MAITRAKAS OF VALABHI
e ee ee al
i! TE ae
Seo evar I sok
. (Courtesy: Department
rtha, old te mple, plan
Fig. 80. Dvarka. Suvarnati
of Archaeology, Gujarat State.)
204
Nagara, 11.C.1.b.
Surastra style, early >Na
~ Sete =
iene
1
nimaginative, this
. by beautiful, Maha-Girjara, late in the eighth century in Surastra
Gujarat, te then being developed in northern
:
Capotkatas of Bhillamala
Historical Introduction
ury A.D., referred
sone e fir st hal f of the seventh cent as
trict Jalor, Rajasthan)
Th pei Hsiian Tsang, in th
to dern Bhinmal, in Dis
mo -
obably Bhillamala, a, wrote his Brah
masphu
the canitalior y ‘(pr atic ia n, Br ah ma gu pt
” and
si dd ha nt an i p ee The mathem lin g hi ms el f a “Bhillamalakacarya,
id
illamala in A.D. 62
8, cal dynasty. An
Sain ie
hr am uk ha of th e Capotkata (Gavada) Rajilla and
aa of Vyag records that one
fascriptonl Ae aasantgadh, District Sirohi, of a.p. 625 rmalata, of
iia CHORE d as fe ud at or ie s of the Capétkata king, Va reported
s si had rule ntury (c. A.D. 680)
Hiauaale. ache his Si su pa la -v ad ha, later in the ce for Varmalata.
thane ed ae
in
va , ha d be en the chief minister patron-
meee = ml Su
pr ab ha de
of hi gh cu lt iv at io n can be seen in its and
Gt sc ll ne e te es ata kingdom was
one
th e li mi te d ex am ples of architecture ot
om cann
ade
mahakavya, and fr e dynasty, however,
sails ene an from its period. The later history of th . 738 from Navsari does
iving of a.p
He eee
y ce rt ai nt y, th ough an inscription their governor, Junaid,
with an
who conquered Sindh in a.p. 712 under kings and
rec ord that the Arabs, Maurya, and Gurjara i
(Kaccha), Sur ast ra, Cavotaka, jara t.
me eee Kacchélla la ké si , th e Ca lu kya governor of Gu d be gu n
lly only by Pu in Rajasthan, alre
ady ha
THe back fina ru le d fr om Ja lo r g a co nf ed -
me ee, urjara
-Pratiharas, who
is pe ri od , pa rt ly as a result of leadin r hand,
th ala, on the othe
imperial power in Mauryas in Uparam
eae ier oward t the Arabs. The
princes agains had become
h ad been dealt a severe blow by
Arab raids, and probably a
aras by this poin t. The Capotkatas
ee feudatories of the Pratih hb or in g Pratih ar a dy na sty,
th e ne ig r chroni-
e gr ow in g power of be re constructed. Late a,
n, District Mehsan746,
th ca nn ot
= uae ae rl y in the eighth cent
ury
(m od er n Pa ta
ea ta ka a, in A.D.
ales a intera that the city of Anahillapa
ct io n
o re co rd ng , Va na ra ja , son of Jayasékhar h century A.D.
Gu ; ata ki y te nt
ded by a Capétk
jarat) was foun so ruled in eastern Surast ra as late as th e earl
and a Capa family al
,
208
Maha-Gurjara style, Arbuda,
Current re
Novation nga on the hor
h, thwest co
e lovely Ma m u c h of the ol
rble py
© 10 V.S, 693/
a.p.
ee i
vasraya of aS suggested a po 636 by Satyabhata,
ce of an a th e Vasantga ssible associat
ion of
srama of dh inscri
Mulaic | as pt ion of v.
s. 682/a.D.
4 Masonr
ate 424); ® Western end of a
j large tect
YY half-roung Coping-sto angular com-
‘me when th, édibandh nes, faces east
® Compounad Mouldings of a small eighth-
already had Pa
rtly silted up
=
so
,
4
La*
_a
210
——EE
ributor.)
(Cou:rtesy: cont
pl e, pl an of compound.
Kusuméa. § ivatem
Fig. 83.
212 II.C.2.
Maha-Gurjara style, Arbuda,
bold, elegant,
Orna
Ellora; the lowe te udgama, in kind res
r level of this
large udga
Projecting rath
ika
ye au Ucak of
a Pillarets » haSensuous] y carv
Sukthaankar’ Tanas te 436) ving lasuna ed
-ghata-bbhuads and ee
Pratiharag tieae . ese images
Otographe), rani ie
w
; all seate ere of Brahma (lef
and Brah and Vis 2U aa
a and Vis in yOgasana t), Siva (
ny by Ce m i s
lestial 4p
Sarases (P ¢ va flanked sing
, Si
late 433). by Saiva
CAPE 213
‘APOTKATAS OF BHILLAMALA
fia y
.
Vedibandhas: ; c. Warman. Surya temple
Fig. 85.
le; b. Varman. Siva temple
a. Kusuma. Siva temp
cont ribu tor. )
(Courtesy:
214 , C.2.
Maha-Gurjara style, Arbuda I1.
Michael W. Meister
REFERENCES
Archaeological Survey
of India, West ern Cir
DR. Bhandarkar, cle, Pro gress Report
, 1916-17, Bo
‘ ‘Indian Studies No.
I, Slow Progress of Islami Po mb
Bhandarkar Oriental
Research Institute, Poo c wer in An ay an
cient India, Annals of the
DR. Bhandarkar, “Va na, X, 31 (Navsari ins
santgadh Inscripti cription).
(1907-08), 187-19 on of Varmalata (Vi : ica,
2, krama) Sarhvat 68 IX
G. Bithler, “A Gran 2,” Epigraphia In
t of Dharanivarah dica,
plates). a of Vadhvan,” Indian
Antiquary, XII (1883), 190-195 (Had¢ ddala
M. A, Dhaky, “The
Genesis and Deve
Temple Architect lo pment of Mar
‘C. Majumdar, “T
ure, ed. Pramod u- Gurjara Temple Arc
Chandra, New Delhi hitecture,” 3 Studieies s inin In Indian
he Chapas,’ ’ The 1975, 150-151.
. 1954, 161, Classical Age (History and Culture of the Indian People
Michael w, Mei
ster, “A Field III), Bom bay
23-46,
Rep ort on Tem ple s at Kusuma,” Archiv
es of Asi'an Art, XX
Michael w. Mei
ster, “A Prelimi IX (1 975-76),
(1973-74), 77.91, nar é
y Report on the Siva Tem
ple at Kusuma,” Archiv:
Richard Salomo es of Asian Ar t, XXVI
n, “Translation
On the History an d Int erp ret
Dasharatha Sh of Art ” Indian Epigraphy, Its
arma, Rajasthan
, “Three Inscripti Through t S, Bikaner 1966, - Gai, New Delhi 1985, 111-114.
ons from Raj
-66), 47-49.
cHapTer 17 1.D.1
style,
Varieties of North Indian style: Kamarupa
c. seventh century A.D.
Varmans of Kamarupa
Historical Introduction
S$upported by his
cop per -pl ate gra nts of Bhaskaravarma, dom of
of chiefs ruling the king
dhan pu r
From the Dubi and Ni
learns of 12 generations
n, one its traced
Nalanda seal-inscriptio ah ma pu tr a val ley of Assam. The dynasty
in the Br habharata
Pragjyétisa (Kamaripa) de mo n- ki ng Nar aka , his son Bhagadatta of Ma
descent from the mythic
al ve epi-
att a. The sam e dyn asty, according to the abo
fame, and the latter’s son
Vaj rad grant), produced the
rs, as sta ted in the Nidhanpur
of 3,0 00 yea scendants, is called
graphs (after a lapse , wh o, as well as his three de
onage, Pusy av ar ma nate frontier-
first historical pers Nal and a seal . Kam ari ipa is mentione das asubordi the dynasty
Maharajadhiraja in the (c. A.D. 350-370), and
ha ba d ins cri ption of Samudragupta of
state in the Al la cen tury A-D., to the patronage
ut the middle of the fourth tury, as
evidently owed its rise, abo to be a Gu pt a feu dat ory during the fifth cen
It con tin ued or seventh
Gupta imperial power. ue of the Gu pt a era in Kamarupa. The sixth
indicated by the prolonged vog the weakness of Gupta
advantage of
ma seems to have taken tury and is stated in the
descendant of Pusyavar beg inning of the sixth cen
ity tow ard s the king his independent
imperial author two ag vamédha sacrifices mar
e pe rf or me d
Nalanda seal to hav
status.
greatness was Bhitiv
The founder of the family’s (Kapili
over the contiguous Davaka
whose authority extended the D
the original donor of
valley further south; he was nscription i
n 200 Brahmanas. A rock-i rifice. The
granting land to more thathat Bhativarma also performe dan asvamédha sacfro m Bhiti-
(District Nowgong) states es an his tor ica l account of the family
a nar rat h
Harsacarita of Banabhatt o was contemporary wit
ka ra va rm a, the 13t h ruler of the dynasty, wh rul er in the lin e is
varma to Bhas ardhana. The tenth
friend and ally of Harsav eat at the hands of the
Hsiian Tsang and was sac rif ice s; the 11th suffered def
credited with two aé va mé dh a elder son, Supratisthita-
gu pt a, and was succeeded by his
Later-Gupta king, Ma ha sé na d by the Gaudas and
600 , Kamartipa was invade
varma. Shortly the rea fte r, inc . A.D . were taken captive
his you nge r brother, Bhaskaravarma,
both Supratisthitava rma and a short reign, and was
Supratisthitavarma had
to Gauda but released
aft er som e tim e. Harsacarita and in
arm a, who is eulogised in the
succeeded by his brothe
r, Bha ska rav of learning, and his
his sta tesmanship, patronage m
Hsiian Tsang’s travel
-ac cou nts for Nidhanpur grant fro
an a; Bh as ka ra varma renewed the the cap ita l of
w hich had been
av ar dh
friendship with Hars near Murshidabad,
na, situated
his camp at Karnasuvar
217
VARMANS OF KAMARUPA
Architectural Features
doorway to a
Bhaskaravarma save probably the
Little remains of architecture under of Madhyadééa.
h shows clos e links to the art
Siva temple at Dah Parbatiya, whic
va temple (Plate 438)
Dah Parbatiya, remains of Sai Parbatiya in
Tez pur , Dist rict Darr ang, Assam, is the village of Dah
Close to the town of ruins of an
bric k temp le of SSiva of the Ahom period overlays
which the remains of a (Plate 438).
ch onl y a hig hly orn ate doorframe has survived
earlier stone temple, of whi ed of
dst one , this has a «T” shaped format and is compos
Made of three pieces of san with patralata, the next wit
h padmalata, the third a
car ved
four sakhas ; the inn erm ost figures of Karttikéya and
wit h pramathas, apsarases, and
stambhaéakha emb ell ish ed tinctive design. Between
h a chain-like garland of dis
Ganééa, the fou rth ado rne d wit ending in human busts,
the ser pen tin e body of a pair of nagas
the first two éak has is tre of the lintel. The
ir tail s hel d by a garuda at the cen
their hands held in anja li, the a bharavahaka on
all ava cap ita ls and plain brackets with
stambhagakhas have gha tap The central one
kap ota dec ora ted with five simhakarnas.
the front; these support
a arnas contain
sa wit h two att end ant s; the flanking simhak
Lakuli g @ flute; the terminal
now harbours seated
eit her a naga Or 4 Siva-gana playin una are
horse-headed Tum bur u and
Siv a wit h att end ant s. Nimbate Ganga and Yam
sitnhakarnas show Surya
and d and is accompanied
of the dvarasakh as; each carries a garlan ing geese
carved on the lower part
ant s car ryi ng @ cam ara and offerings. A pair of flygoddesses.
by three female att end ve the heads ofthe riv er-
g gar lan ds in the ir beaks are represented abo of the Maniyar Math nagini, but
holdin scent
river-goddesses is remini Central India,
The modelling of the and som ewh at congealed stances. In
their attendants have trib al fea tur es
monuments no earlier
by a central gar uda becomes common on
the motif of nagas held
than the seventh century A.D.
Krishna Deva
ee
REFERENCES
Thomas, London 1897.
ta, Hars a-ca rita , trans . b y E.B. Cowell and F.W. 1951.
Banabhat Nowgong
of Assam, vol. I,
B.K. Barua, A Cultural History 1933. , 65-79.
vol. I, Shillong ia Indica, XII (1913-14)
K.L. Barua, History of Kamarupa, tes of Bh as ka ravarman, ” Epigraph rm an ,” Ep ig raphia
er- Pla ka ra va
P. Bhattacharya, “Nidhanpur Copp
the Ni dh an pu r Co pper-Plates of Bhas
P. Bhattacharya, “Two Lost Plates of
(1927-28), 115-125. skaravarman, ” Bpigraph
ia Indica, XIX
Indica, XIX
rd Los t Pla te of the Nidhanpur Plates of Bha
P. Bhattacharya, “A Thi
(1927-28), 245-250.
a :
ass cal Age (History and Culture of the Indian People II),
Historical Introduction
Durg, and
reg ion of Cha tti sga rh, com pri sing Raipur, Bilaspur, Raigarh, Maha-
The present des h, was known as Daksina Kosala or
s of Mad hya Pra
Rajnandgaon District cam e wit hin the sphere of Gupta imp
erial influence,
s area
késala in ancient tim es. Thi
which refers to Mahén-
fro m Sam udr agu pta ’s Allahabad pillar inscription, by
as we kno w sinapatha kings defeated
Vya ghr ara ja of Mahakantara among Dak on abo ut the se
and inform ati
as subordinate allies. No other
dra of Kos ala
Samudragupta and reinstated Era, however, was used as late as A.D. 601 in the Arang
ta
kings has survived. The Gup
mas éna of the Raj arsitulya family. with concurrent
plate of Bhi ies who ruled in Mahakosala
s of thr ee dyn ast apuriyas and
We have record ies. Princes of the Sarabh
sixth and eighth centur a-
jurisdiction between the ts fro m odern Sirpur) on the Mah
lan d-g ran den ce of
of Mahakésala. On the evi
iss ued
the Panduvarhsis both hav e ‘tal
nadi, which appears to of the Panduvamsis. The
the Sar abh apu riy as are regarded as predecessors ily into prominence, is
epigraphy, line, Indrabala, who brough
t the fam
second ruler of the latter ter)
Ind rab alaraja, the sar vad hikaradhikrta (prime-minis
wit h mah asa man ta it wou ld imp ly
identified raja. If this is accept
ed,
a ruler, Sudeva
of the penultimate Sarabhapurly own dynasty.
master and set u p his
that Indrabala ousted his
Rajarsitulyas are known from a
ast y kn ow n as the Rajarsitulyakula
Six rulers belonging to a dyn Bhimaséna II. This
ng, iss ued by the last ruler of the line, Imperial
copper plate found at Ara lingering influence of the
the
/a.D. 601 and attests to Gupta Era
grant is dated in G.E. 282 i rea ds the date as year 182 of the
| ala. V.V . Mir ash fifth century,
Guptas in Daksina Kos tha t thi s dyn ast y flourished during the
d imp ly
(a.p. 501), which woul and the Panduvamsis.
apurlyas
thus preceding the Sarabh
|
Sarabhapuriyas ef
dy na st y and of its cap ita l, $arabhapura, was a chi
apuriya emperor Bha-
The founder of the Sarabh the maternal uncle of
fied with Sarabharaja, ough
called Sarabha. He is
identi at Eran in a.p. 510 (th
ja, wh o die d fighting ina battle son, Maha-
a was succeeded by his
Gop ara
nugupta’s associate ept ed) . Sar abh
sl y acc ing the 24 years of
this is not unanimou sur viv ing copper-plate grants dur
raja Naréndra, who iss
ued thr ee akesvara. Naréndra
abhapura and one from his camp at Til
his reign, two from $ar
220
a e. uD.2.
Daksina Kosal styl s
I. Rajarsitulya dynasty
Il. Pandu dynasty ékal
ala
of Méek
Sara
Jayabala
Daya ital
Vatsaraja = Drénabhatt
arika
Vibhisana
Nagabala = Indrabhattérika
Bhimaséna |
Bharatabala
(Indrabala)
Dayitavarma [1
(Lokaprakaga) = Ma
hadavi
Bhimaséna I Amarakulaja
(c.z. 282/a.p,
602)
Strabala (Udirnnavair
a)
Il. Sarabhapuriya
dynasty
Sarabha
Naréndra
Prasanna or
Prasannama
tra
Jayaraja
Durgaraja-Manama
tra
Pravararaja
Vyaghraraja
Sudévaraja
Pravararaja
II
221
PANDUVAMSI Ti
NDUVAMSIS OF SRIPURA AND NALAS
Indrabala
Bhavadéva-Ranakésarl
[sanadéva
Nannaraja I
Candragupta
(c. A.D. 540-560)
Tivaradéva
(c. A.D. 515-535) Harsagupta = Vasata
(c. A.D. 560-595)
Nannaraja II
larjuna
Mahasivagupta-Ba
(c. A.D. 595-655)
Sivanandi
V. Nala dynasty
Bhavadattavarma
Skandavarma
Arthapati
Prthviraja
Virapaksa
Vilasatunga
I1.D.2.
Daksina Kosala style,
Net Mags
: Re
:
:ygy
meeps oy
4 a}
3
%
Gi z
ole
L
om“, , KAWARDHA, ILASPUR.
ARD) ©
; | rr
{BatKenn
po ~
S€orinarayan Se
=
e 7 Pujaripali
as I Turturia
:
i 1@
A OURS
fa
4
a
; GP
fp KANKER L if
MILEg 10 9
records as
king, to whom he refers in his
te a feudatory of a Gupta
a
appears
See a town called
Prasannamatra, who founded
epi
was
humane
tt apada. The next ruler
:
ep
Prasann.
itya and Kramaditya. His coin
; . ee aa eu
ain ‘
ing Ch an da in Maharashtra ne
ame npecn are a, inc lud four copper-plate
d by his son Jayaraja, who issued
Bakonltssae eae was
su cc ee de of Mahakosala and
nts co me from the eastern districts by all
d seals that is followed
ra. His gra
adjouingiod abhapu tt er n na ma tra-
set a pa his brother Ma
sukeegient eae and . Jay araja -
of Ma ha ké sa la aia issued nine copper
Durearaja ts ers son S men -
succeeded by his from Sripura
pistelee .Seeds0 was an d thr ee from Sripura. Those us
Sara bh ap ur a d with the homonymo
Honvanten Seahikrta Indrabalaraja, sometimes identifie évaraja seems to have
Pan erence ce ath er of Tivaradéva,
as dutaka. Sud
reign. Sudéva-
shifted hi rul er, gra ndf in the latter part of his
is capital from Sara bhapura to Sripura
ther Pravararaja.
raja ee followed by his bro lde
(Bilaspur District) has yie
Ae 4 .ba ea site of Malhar regnal year. Vyaghrardja Is
by Vyaghraraja in his fourth
ee agane Page of king Pravara-bhattaraka,
son of Jaya
brother
va eee Laer Vyaghraraja
a. Tho ugh some scholars consider , and also
Sasabh apu rh ' t of the charter, the seal
not convincing; the draf
ee amily, this is
eet
of the Sarabhapurtyas:
ae aselfrom other grants es of Visnu, invariably calling themselves para-
were devote omplete copper-plate
gute encati,: eee ksmi on their seals. An inc
Gajala
cnet at Meet : sein Rai pur Dist rict assigns an endowment
in favour ofa
oun at Rav a in
Ahem s probably
ons temple of Sridharasvami. this family waned, and the dynasty wa
: fter Sudévaraja, the fortunes 0 f
upplanted by the Panduvamésis.
vamsa) dynast y
Panduvamsis d avavamsa Or Soma istrict Banda,
e Pa nd uv ar ns a (P an
er of th ara (D
i ne known memb recorded in a rock inscrip tion at Kalanj a, often identified
UP) as ae d by In dr ab al
of th at re gi on . He was succee de Sa rabhapurlya ru
ler,
at wire
ki ng
aj a, sa rv ad hi ka ra dh iktt a of the er or of
samanta Indrabalar nar aja , is described as th
e “con qu
s to
had four sons; one , Nan késari), se em
Sudévaraja. Indrabala adurga and Rana
(also called Cint edited with restoring 4 Buddh-
erno r in Maharastra
. He is cr ara inscrip-
a bee n Nan nar aja ’s gov
is men tio ne d in the Laksmanésv succeeded
yaghosa. iganadéva
Sur with villages. Nannaraja W as
pe nes ere by owed the temple
pa ve end of the whole 0
eats pees pow erf ul rul er sty led “the overlord
éva, a vaisnava, an
adie nie ala.” He was a parama ink that the
Gass = fo e dal as lik e Utk
ate cha rte rs. Some sc holars th aradéva,
per-pl
ls of his three cop temporary of Tiv
= eee = sea havavarma (c. A.D. 520-560) was 3 con
Mes gee i king Mad Nanna-
on this point. paramavaisnava.
sat s no consensus ed by his son Nannaraja II, styled t no re cords.
fais Siac Ni follow
a an d Ha rs ag up ta, who have lef of Su rya-
ania bhp:
ed by Candragupt
Vi sn u; he ma rr ie d Vasata, daughter avarma
devotee of king [san
pees y a is Pee as a with Saryavarma, son of the Maukhari Balarjuna), the
, identi fi ed ow n as
rae oe 0 ha vagupta (also kn ed
ar sa gu pt a wa s fo llowed by Mahasi
ig ne d for 57 ye ar s. Though he styl
: o i wh o re
a r of Mahakosala,
st influential rule
224 e. D.2.
Daksina Kosala styl Il
Plates of Va
k
Prthvigéna
Piteon
exander Cunningham » architecturg
] remains (Fig, 94a;
who Visited Raiim Plates 439-443)
Raa macandra temple was : bui lt 250 and z ;
in: the védibandha 4 m in 188 1-82, record
aji
Wot Gly that, like other tor
suarantees that
teat the te
years ago. Th
*mple can b
ed a tradition that the
Fi‘888.
Tala.a Siva te
amp,le, plan.
PANDUVAMSIS OF SRIPURA AND NALAS ee
to c. A.D. 550-575.
Rajim, Rdjivaléca <a
na temple (Figs. 87, 91a-b, &
frontispiece; Plat 2-460)
es 45
a, and a
as triangular frills) are vis kapotapali with a row of pataesome
decorated with véd ible. Bhadras introduce
ika (Plate 456). an antarapalt
On each bhadra,
th e jangha shows a
a large, straight-e dee
dged chadya
457). The jangha
i
ndika comprises
two Prominent kapo
atnas on the corn tapalis with pi.laster
The 6j ers. s between th at
'
and yi
| of the éikh
|
a wih LD ip ed b ni
large sith ak che, the Kapotapali was
ge A tions fixed ar na, decorated
:a sAsatun to the inner
eee g a ™andapa wa
‘yf e ala Ne’ a seco ll of the
St ing Tiption is nd of he Kalacuri fe temple include one,
by ree Tu Paleographic udat
pn ction of a
Visnu temp ally assignab ory Jagapaladéva,
young. le y Vila le to c. a.p.
100 earlier The Rajivaléca satunga in 700-725
Style toc, th an the L, sMa na te mp le , however, commemora
ti
Rajivalocana
4 00. The Na na temp]
: t Si Du should be at on of
least
Pose 10n d g Telervaand is assignable on grounds a
i
hae
s no nc e of
1, Part of the faca 8 the present arbh to the earliest phas
de of the ataa agrha ; : e of es
grha, its entire su ture,
“79Pa, and a few of the rstruc
pe the
interior pillars.
231
PANDUVAMSIS OF SRIPURA AND NALAS
ym,
#iT
mm
+
temple, plan.
Fig. 87. Rajim. Rajivalécana
232
Daksina Kosala style, I1.D.2.
tyard is fringe
lery) that Provided d by pillars meant to
Osing vithika (gal
461). Each viha access to cells fo
ra is en: r the
k row of
and flanked by li
fe
z plan.
Fig. 88. Sirpur. Anandaprabha vihara,
-473)
(Figs. 89, 91d: Plates 464
Sirpur, Laksmana temple . Beglar reported that
the
. on a 7 ft. high stone jagati ine s
tem ple sta nds subsidiar y bri ck shr
This brick-built nda tio n surrounded by eight
. a cel lul ar fou no w lost .
temple was built on
y as mounds of bricks . All traces of these are
|
preserved in his day onl a mandapa with
} eas t and con sis ts of a garbhagrha, kapili, and stone
The temple faces ers (Fig. 89). Only the
s ten peripheral pilast
and perhap oached by lateral
three pairs of pillars jag ati (67 x 39 ft.) was appr
ain . Th e smoothly
ucted of finely jointed and
lars rem
kumbhakas of the pil gar bha grh a, con str
t. Th e The fagade
flights of steps on the eas bha dra , pra tiratha, and karna parts.
rubbed bricks, is tri-an
ga on pla n wit h
apa preserves only a
up to the jangha level only, and the mand
of the kapili is preserved .
small portion of the
jangha ed with conventional
sis ts of khu ra, kumbha, kalasa (adorn apallava
The védiband ha con
in g nic hes fr am ed by pilasters with ghat
rapatta show ettes (Fig. 91d). The
leaves and fruit), anta bel ow by a course of half ros
capitals, and kapota pal i ado rne d are seen on each
h lar ge can dra galikas, of which three
kapotapali is decora ted wit taller, and kalaga and
jec tions. The kumbha is
on the oth er pro is surmounted
bhadra and one each
ly sma lle r, on the pra tirathas. The kapdtapali
antarapatta proportional a that supports the
jangha.
ow
mafcik The bhadra-projections
sh
by védika and a short cantoned by pilasters. ns
are jec tio
All angles of the jangha -467). Pratiratha pro
| ht- ed
edg awning above (Plates 465 arn a.
ghanadvaras with straig and prominent simhak
canopied by kapotapali, védika, The
are clasped by niches framing a narrow slit.
with a pair of pilasters
Karnas show slight pro
jections avas, while the cantoning
bhadra and karna carry ghatapall
!
pilasters projecting from members with laguna and
pra tir ath as and elsewhere carry crowning
pilasters on the
234
.2.
Daksina Kosala style, II.D
Le
235
PANDUVAMSIs OF SRIPURA AND NALAS
2 (Sa
» about 39 Miles sou varinarayana), is situ-
theast of Bilaspur
and
pichaed st and was built near the
Mpl e
to the Laksmana tem
is ere y dilapidated, small brick
ple at @ Stone jaga
1
angled projections (Fig, 92) rpur, it ti, While stil] Close in date and
S pratirathas, li general style
ke those of the
Rama temple,
have
yr OT
|
}
238
aksina
Daksin Kosala style, Il
D.2.
besa ap fa)
plautanrCA
({
:
FLO
l
a
aI i |
a-b, Rajim.
Ra ji valécana temp
Sirpur, La le; ¢. Sirp
8. Kharod. Smana temp ur, Anandapr
le
Savarinarayana : e-f, Sirpur, Rama abha vihara;
temple, temple;
Posed
Mple stand
of khur ‘
Kalaga, antar dation. The védib
»
Toje a
th subdiv ndha mouldings
apatta wi
dr
kapa pali Moul a a armas use
g uch sh
isions a
nd — ee
dings, h
us creat orter kum kapotapali
bha
239
PAANDUVAMSIS
MSI OF SRIPURA AND NALAS
ter Meister.)
na temple, plan. (Af
Fig. 92. Kharad. Savarinaraya
all projections,
ers , fl an ki ng oblong slits on
nated by pil ast ers have bold
The jangha is domi a reg ula r nic he. These R ucaka pilast saka. The
except the bhadras,
which have
cl ud e a flu ted gha ta and a cruciform sir
r part whic h in ove rises a
mouldings on the uppe wi th st ep pe d bosses below. Ab
by a bold kapota pa li th mukulas
jangha is capped rm ou nt ed by a se cond kapotapali wi
unted pilasters su
varandika with st
marked by well-
below.
vil i near contour, with four storeys four small
cur
The éikhara has a slight (Plates 476-477). The
principal ratha shows
articulated bhami-ama
lakas quarter amalakas.
nke d on the pratirathas by
asters an d fla e (Plate 477). Hori-
sithhakarnas framed by pil am al ak as as a grace-not
rnamal ak as oc cu r ti ny
nds of kapo ta separa
ting the pilasters
Below the lowest ka ba
zontal lines in the sik
hara are em ph as iz e d by
stored but the cro wning
amalaka may
the sik har a has be en re
of each bhumi. The top of a mandapa, the
preceded by
be original.
is pr ec ed ed by a kapili wall; this was ers, as known from an old
The garbhagrha ts framed by pilast n. One of the
ig in al fe at ur es of which comprised sli ng ru ou s modern restoratio ns, carries
or a is an in co
esent mandap nal and 16-sided se
ctio
photograph. The pr of alternately octago fs (Fig.
de has a shaft and geometrical mo
ti
original pillars insi is ca rv ed with elegant floral
e, an d
a ghatapallava abov
94b; Plate 475).
240
2.
Daksina Késala style, ILD
RRNA
ceretoaene ‘ae
v iSiwiviwieTy)
LY YY
s
=2
N
Oxugs
241
PANDUVAMSIS OF SRIPURA
NDUVAMSIS OF SRi AND NALAS
ee EAST
XNDOOO (OXY;
See CER
RY SEN
ORS SE O AOE
(Seas y; y
a If:‘ 33 EG
;
ayana temple.
Fig. 94. Pillars:
ndra temple; b. Kharéd. Savarinar
a. Rajim. Ramaca
Ze
242 Daksina Késala style, 1.D
goddesses on the
pédyas of the ja
This temple js no mbs
t far removed fr
to c. A.D. 650, towa om the two Sirp
rds the close
of the reign of ur te mples in style and may dat e
Kharéd, Inda] Dé Mahasiva
ul (Figs. 95, gupta-Balarjuna.
97a; Plates 48
This west-faci ng 0- 484)
brick-with-
village. The te
Tenovated, ston
e jagati. Only
is damaged be hd 15 ft, 6 j the garbhagrha
northern face yond the thir ,
is lost. Like
Projections, the
ndha moulding
s, Testing on
sed of Khura- a stone kharag
kumbha, ka
laéa decorate
ila, are unif
or
d with foliage, an m antinarahepat
ight
ta
243
PANDUVAMSIS OF SRIPURA AND NALAS
utraka on the
ata with ghatapallavas (with a niche on the karnas and bharap
kapotapali is surmounted
: as), and kapétapali decorated with candraéalikas. The i
y poets antarapatta capped by a manicika. i
tall pilasters on the b
__ the jangha over the mancika shows plain
vee surmounted by simhavyala. Remai ning eae of the vee iat
a
slightly projected short niches capped by
aeasters, those on the karnas clasped by of a
nent sirmhakarna containing an image
A potapali with candragalikas and a promi
atha shows a smaller simmhakarna containing
eity (Plate 480). The pilaster on the pratir human
is flanked by rampant sitnhavyalas, with
a divine head or bust. This pilaster
hants.
riders, trampling on paired couchant elep padmasana, who
figu on the bhadra, seated in
re
The south wall shows a defaced éa in the simhakarna
a four-armed dancining g Gané
could have been Lakuliga or Bra hm, kar na. The east wall
med seated Narasiraha on the east
as the west karna, and two-ar the sou th karna, and
sta ndi ng Sur ya on the bhadra, Visnu sea ted on Garuda on
sho ws dam d north
age
:
a and Saci rid ing on an ele pha nt on the north karna. The muc h ed Kubéra on
ndr seat
divinity (Durga?) on the bhadra and
wall shows traces of a ten-armed ts of Siva (includ-
projections show heads o r bus
k a. The angled pratiratha
the east karn
th pratiratha of the east wall).
ing Mahééamirti on the sou le tho se on the Sabari temple an d the
simhakar-
jan gha res emb and its
The pilasters on the tem ple at Sirp ur. The height of the jangha
on the Ram a
nas on the karnas those The varandika with védika
low the Sabari temple’s mode.
staggered pat ter nin g als o fol (more clearly than before)
sk ed par tly by sim hak arn as, which make the varandika
is ma
of the sikhara.
seem to be the lowermost storey ee of its four bhumis
is cur vil ine ar (Pl ate 480 ), and has preserved thr l ratha of the
The éikhara
both karnas and ang led pratirathas. The centra
marked by amalakas on the south (Plate
kar nas con tai nin g fig ures on each bhami. On ), a four-
éikhara shows simmha j S ; (on the varandika
four simhakarnas contain rmed
e east are four-a
480), a progression of i
yaksa, south
armed seated deity, a seated a bust of Mahesamirti, and a hea d of Siva. The ple,
ple , cou
Narasimha, a divine cou of Kubera, the north
karna, a seated divine
a figu re an amalaka
karna of the east sho ws
mi on the pra tir ath as is marked by
Each bhi
probably Siva-Parvati. -
ama lak a and vijapuraka. ils of figural and decora
crowned by a tiny stuccoed surf aces . Fin er deta
incised
had
The entire temple once been picked out in this stucco and finished
by
to hav e
tive ornament seem
The first sakha is
lines. only three gakhas.
ate 4 82) preserves of manibandha,
The stone doorframe (Pl relief, the second with a complex form The lintel
in low f GangaA and Yamuna. of adoring
carved with patravalli an d lar ge fig ure s ©
y bold a pair
the third with unusuall at the centre flanked by Brahma, Visnu,
Siv a-P arv ati
shows seated lly, it
couples at the ends. apos?e O f Mahakésal a style; architectura and
nagis, and by naga temple marks th e temp! e at Kh ar od
Sculpturally, this an the Sirpur temples an d the Sabari a temp le at Palari. The
is more developed th atures of th e Siddhésvar
of the advanced fe
anticipates many c. A.D 650-675.
temple may be assigned to
es 485-493)
hé sv ar a te mp le (Figs. 96, 97b: Plat mple faces
Palari, Sidd of Ra ip ur . Th e Siddhésvara te
43 5 mi les northeast amund tank.
Palari is situated about ba nk of the large Bals with fine stu cco coating; only
sou th
west and stands on the t of brick
a sto ne jag ati , th e temple is buil
Raised on
e
Pig. 96. Palani. Siddhésvara
temple, plan. (After Meister.)
its garbhagrha is pr
angled projections.
ands on a plain bric :
a, kalaga, antarapatt k course resting on a kharasila;
Pen e mould-
maficika (Fig, 97
b).
a, an d kapdtapali topped e e and
The jangha rising by a
over the mancika
bhadra and karnas displays prominent \
and £T ones on the pr simhakarnas on the
at ir at h as. The pratirat ;
The upper half itmhakarnas (Pla
te 48 has in fact sho wa
6) ,
cruciform Sirsakas, of the jar angha isi demarcated by
a pattika; pilasters
The main sitnhakarnas terminate in
489); those on on the jangha harbour
images of deities 6,
(Plates 486, 488-
the Pratirathas
Shows dancing show human
Ganég aon the bhadra, hea
488-489), e
Skanda ridir S Or grasamukhas. The south w all
, Corresponding fj
PANDUVAMSIs OF SRIPURA AND NALAS 245
Fig.97. Védibandhas:
a. Kharod. Indal temple; _b. Palari. Siddhésvara temple.
as Gajantaka (left) and Andhakantaka (right). Above the heads of iver- desses
the river-godde
have survived six figures of the Dikpalas, three on
each side.
The crowded grouping of the figures on the doorframe is : cons .
istent w ith the
surfeit of architectural ornaments on the tem 2
ple’s facade creating aRet? hids
jumbled effect. The architect of the tem
ple seems to be obsessed Meoe ae
structure with oraments, without realising the val
architectural articulation. ue of plain surfac
That this temple is a close successor ee Pit
elaboration of plan and elevation, by of the Indal Déul is shown bya teat SiR
the use of stucco, and by ae am
graphic forms. The affinity othe
in
the design
images of Kubéra, Gajalaksmi, and Gan of védibandha, éikhara, door oie his two
é§a is so striking as to sugges Ta
temples could be separated by no mor
e than 25 years. The e Fire,
may be assigned to c. a.p. 675 Palari temple,
-700.
Adbhar, Siva temple (Fig, 98:
Plates 494-496)
The Siva temple at Adbhar
Bilaspur District, wa
-mandapa. "y
late 494), is supported on four p1
newhat Tesembling that ons, a constricted neck, and a large
in the much more ornate Rastrakuta
: igure of eight-armed Natésa showing 4
8. The loose image of Nandi is consis-
€ figures of the >;
modellin
‘ g rem 5
iniscent 9 he river
tion of the fj
at o
Between the fh
karna and bhadra "ge simhakarnas
Corner bast
) that mark
the corner projec appear on the
ions. The s of
architec
PANDUVAMSIS OF $RIPURA AND NALAS 249
Krishna Deva
REFERENCES
Archaeological Survey
of India, Wester n Circ
D ouglas Barrett and le Progress Report, 1903-04,
M.. Dikshit, Mukh 20-37.
alingam Temples; Sir ;
13-32, pur and Rajim Femples, 1960,
Alexander Cunningh
am, Archaeological Bombay
Krishna Deva, “ ak Surve y of India Reports,
shmana Temple at VII (1878), 148-156; ae eee , 6-31.
35-42, Sirpur,” Journal of the
Madhya Pradesh Itihasa Parishad,
MG. Dikshit, “Si
rpur Inscription
B.C. Jain, Utki
Epigraphia Indica, XXXI (1956), 197 -199.
Hira Lal, “Sirpur § 1961,
A.H. Longhurst, “ pta,” Epigraphia In :
Annual Report emples in the Central Provin dica, XI ake i4-201.
1909-10, 11-47. ces,” Archaeological india,
Surv y
Central India and
( ter, Philadelphi Their ‘Demoni c’ Plans,” Discourses on Siva,
V.V. Mirashi a 1984, 119-1492, ed.
“The Date of Tiv
(1979), 1. aradeva Journa
l] of the Epigra
VV. Mirashi, phical Society
Inscriptions of of India, IV (19 VI
V.V. Mirashi the Vakdtakas 77), 1-5;
“Rajim (Ra i (Cor , Pus Inscrj pti
Indica, XxVy onum Indicarum 5), Oot
(1941) , 49-58, ne Inscript ion acamund Poa
VV. Mirashi, of the Nala King Vilasatun
“Three Ancient ga,” Epigrap
Dy Rasties of Mahakosala,” Bullet
~47), 46-56. in of the Deccan College Res
‘The Date of th
e La
earch Ins ti-
of Art, ed, F
ple at Sirpur,” Indian Epi
» New Delhi 198 graphy: Its Bearin. g on the istor
5, 105-109, History
A.M, Shastri, :” Journa
“A, Note on th
e I
j | of
| i, “The Sarabha ©, Journal of sAndhra
Bia 1:
Visnukun odin Madhavava
rman,” Sri M.S. Sarma
| , “Ware Madh ” Prachyyaa pm e :
Pratib
tibhha
ical Researc
| j
Delhi 1984, 137-145. cient Kos la ‘,” Journal of the Epigraphica
)
ala and the Stellate Plan
i Kalédargana, ed. Joa
nna G. Williams, New
Sailodbhavas
Historical Introduction
from the land of the Mahéndra moun-
The Sailodbhavas claimed a mythical descent
from the Ganjam copper-plate charter
tain. The first important chief of the line, known
Maharaja Mahasamanta Sainyabhita
issued from Kongoda in G.£. 300/a.D. 619, was
of Districts Ganjam and Puri), who was
Madhavaraja II, ruler of Kongéda (now part
of Karnasuvarna and a sworn adversary of
feudatory of Maharajadhiraja Saéanka, king d
a devout worshipper of Mahéévara is prove
king Harsavardhana. That Sasanka was the Ekamr a-
later Sanskrit works, like
by inscriptional records as well as references in a linga at Tribhuvanésvara (present
of
purana, that credit him with the enshrinement at the site.
well represent the first stone temple
Bhubaneswar) in a temple that might of the Lakul iga-P asupata
in the establishment
Sasanka may have been instrumental the seven th centu ry A.D.,
is not certain; from early in
sect at Bhuvanéévara, though this es on which image s of
prolific centre for templ
however, Bhuvanéévara became a Madhava-
y all the Sailodbhava kings following
Lakuliéa figure prominently. Practicall Saiva templ es in
mably took interest in erecting
raja II professed Saivism, and presu
Orissa. e after reverses by Sasanka and extended
Madhavaraja II asserted his independenc Khurda copper-plates, issued from his
to his
the boundaries of his kingdom according described as “sakala Kalingadhipati.” That
in whi ch he is
victorious camp at Kongoda, er-plates dated 50,
long spa n is app are nt from the Orissa Museum copp
his rule had a to the Harsa era,
be his regn al year (so me scholars, however, have referred
which may copper-plate
a date of a.p. 656) . According to his Orissa Museum
which would yiel d had been
hav ara ja I per for med grea t sacrifices such as avamédha. He
inscription, Mad but again reasserted his
hana shortly before A.D. 643,
forced to submit to Harsavard
in a.D. 646.
power after Harsa’s death and mentions three coun-
ough Orissa in a bout a.p. 639,
Hsiian Tsang travelled thr ent that Kon0 géda (then
s, Odr a, Kon god a, and Kal inga. From his narr ative, it is evid “the country
trie ords tha t
ara ja II) was mos t powerful. Hstian Tsang rec ls to the edge
hav hil
under Mad
e ten s of tow ns whi ch stretched from the slopes of the ch kept the
ng, there was a gallant army whi perform-
contained som
the tow ns wer e nat ura lly stro
of the sea. As ul enemy. The
, and so there was no powerf
neighbouring countries in awe Mad hav araja Il in the last part of his reign would
dha sac rif ice by pos-
ance of the agvamé
ed his aut hor ity ove r nei ghbouring territories, including
indicate that he extend
sibly part of Odra.
leg
Ny m4)
ay,
r
Ranabhita
Sainyabhita Madhavaraja
I
Ayasobhita I
Sainyabhita Madhavara
ja II (Madhavavarma)
Ayasdbhita Madhyama
raja |
Manabhita Dharmaraja
(unnamed son)
Ranaksdbha Madhyama
raja 1]
Allavaraja
Madhyamaraja III
(son of Yuvaraja Taillapanibh
a)
SAILODBHAVAS 253
oMohangiri
:
70 90 0
i
255
SAILODBHAVAS
temples, built
as given in a later
“ParaSé$vara” (perhaps a
ame of Paraéara, one of the
in sandstone, the temple
1on-headg, scrolls, harn Variety of moat; mbha, Kalaga, and kapotapali, the
s Ae , motifs, suc last ele-
h 48 ornate candraésalika
nt and with lotus or
and fjfloral desiails, vidyadharas,
gns Within diam human figures including
ond-shaped, tr
iangular, or
SAILODBHAVAS
e bhadra’s
top and b
ee
2
259
SAILODBHAVAS
F. 0
The
rway on the east (Plate 532).
ngs , int err upt ed by bhadra-nich es and by a doo
mouldi tored.
damaged, has be en well res Gane-
temple, though much s tan din g Parvati (N; Plate 536), seated
in the thr ee bha dra -niches are
Images
(W). . mbha-
éa (S), and Karttikéya ed of a rupasakha, sta
me of the nor th nic he (Plate 536) is compos fri eze s rep res ent ing
The fra sion of
mal asa kha ; the lint el above shows a succes of a Siv ali nga , and
éakha, and the worship
converging vidyadharas, on
Uma-Mahéévara adored
by s that on the north; that
The fra me of the western niche replicate ws seated
Parvati-p ari nay a.
kha wit h lot us- pet als . The lintel on the south sho
the south replaces malasa rying a garland.
ith una amidst patravalli car h sithha-
and crowning udgamas, wit
Ganééa and a kin nar a-m
hes hav e orn ate fra mes
The empty karna nic fig ures.
bouring miscellaneous t kapota-
karnas and gavaksas har , san dwi che d between a pair of elegan
var and ika d below it),
The rapakantha of the ad, sli ght ly projecting, decorated ban
ing a bro eastern flank
palis (the lower one hav ive sce nes (Plates 534-535). The
variou s nar rat Sugriva,
is embellished with
ent s the con fer enc e of Rama and Laksmana with
of the north side repres
1, 1.D we
262
Kalinga style, phase
ng Harihara,
The eight karna niches in some cases retain original images includi
niches rest on a series of
Nataraja, and dancing Ardhanariévara (Plate 543). These and
, including animals
mouldings based by ornate tulapitha carved with designs
narrative scenes (Plate 544).
bhadra niches cut through the
As on the Paraguraméévara temple, the now-empty figures on the
Saiva pratiharas or other
védibandha; their jambs have four éakhas, with
Uma-Mahéévara and Ganesa at their
pédyas. The lintels on the east and south have
a slightly-projected broad ornate band
centres. The rupakantha of the varandika (with proces-
scenes, such as Siva’s marriage
underneath) was embellished with narrative
sion (Plate 543). -
e (Plate 542) has four §akhas: the inner
The garbhagrha’s “ ”-shaped doorfram next figu red with deco ra-
ng from a hamsa), the
most is carved with patravalli (emanati a prati-
lava (these two having pédyas showing Saiv
tive segments based by a ghatapal mult iple deco rative
based by ghatapallava with
haras), the third is a stambhaéakha gakh a fring ed by a
and finally there is a mala
segments and plain curved brackets,
beaded fillet. minor
a central relief divided into zones with
The lintel is unique in ha ving Parvati flan ked by
s. (The upper register shows Siva and
rectangular and square register ing a stan -
ed prat ihar as; abov e are garl and- bearing vidyadharas and a gana hold lion ,
seat Parvati’ s
lowe r regi ster disp lays knee ling devotees in front of Nandi, as
dard. The ng voluptuous kany
is flanked by two tilakas containi
and more devotees.) The lalata two shrines, one harbour-
or); at the end of the lintel are
(one admiring herself in a mirr
r the head of Siva.
ing a Sivalinga and the othe had gud hamandapas, as evidenced
by mason’s
this gro up
walls surviving on the stone
All three temple s in
tom course of the mandapa
lines for placement of the bot
slabs of the plinth. 8)
, 104d; Plates 546-54
, La ks ma né sv ara temple (Figs. 103
Bhuvanés va ra — has been
the earliest of the group
haps
iddle, smallest, and per gha (Plate 546).
i —
nes for all of the gik hara and much ofthe jan pali. Ne
ee sto ants below its kapota
pissActingi has no mukulika pend
(Fi g. 104 d) ntape ae sr2 e
Its vediba nd ha
pe d (Pl ate 547 ), with a plain sill; it so :a ha i a
-sha base, then a Ruca
The doorframe is «T va pratiharas at the
ras akh a wit h Sai e a, and a
innermost a pat ds, and ornate a
base, ornamental
ban ne seri ae
with ghatapallava ksa des ign . Th e lintel depicts e
ished with Ssr ivr circular ptt
bahyagakha embell
ned in the gar bha grha is fixed in a
The Sivalinga enshri
north.
channel towards the 10 4e; Plates 545, 54
9-553)
le (F ig s. 10 3;
nésvara temp
Bhuvaneésvara, Satru gh Imost all of its gikh
ara (Plate 550). Its
mple of th e gt a, with a wide
The northernmo st te re pl ic at es th at of the Laksmanésvar
» Plate 549)
its below the karna red niches (Plate 545).
variety of designs on yee! rec: ove p.
from thedesite
e ama rdi ni been
saat have bee
nas akh a.
Decora tiv aé ;sa sur rat
ant innermostrosettes. The
: duces a luxuri squ ari sh
ae : “cha okeved With
a The o frae me of the sout
an d ba hy a ga kh and bears the
e st am bh a- , griivrksa-,
sr
ar at ahas are
Others
th is fr am e ha s be en shifted to the St san temples, gr
lintel of t gr ah as (Plate 5 52). ( cording to Pa
nigrahi,
re s of ei
i gh Ac
labelled fii gu e garbhagrha’s
i t on ly on the lintel of th
s
ee -
11.D.3.
Kalinga style, phase 1,
|
|
c. Bharatégvara:
d. Laksmanéévara;
SAILODBHAVAS 265
a temple;
the characters of the graha-labels are earlier than those on the Parasuraméévar
améévara are slightly
ihe Sircar is of the opinion that the graha-labels on the Parasur
earlier.
lintel; its principal sakhas are
The garbhagrha’s doorway (Plate 553) has lost its
s in its meanders), stambhagakha,
patragakha, padmalata (on the right displaying yaksa two sakhas
pédyas below the first
and bahyasakha carved with érivrksa. The broad
on the right). The garbhagrha enshrines a
show Saiva pratiharas (Nandi, left; Mahakala
Sivalinga.
Bhuvanéégvara, the Yam @svara compound, small temp
le (Plates 554-555)
rine stood half-buried within the compound
Facing northeast, this small sandstone sh
showed it to be c. 4 ft. 11 in. square
of the Yaméévara temple until recent cle arance
externally and c. 8.5 ft. high. bhu-
rves two bhumis, for which the upper
The dvi-anga sikhara (Plate 554) prese all upper memb ers
se has bee n mutilated and
mi-amalaka is lost; the shoulder cour by a sith haka rna;
a series of gurasénakas crowned
lost. The central ratha is carved with adorned by half or full
of the vénukééa are also
the flanking uparathas and khandas
simhakarnas. the front face, shows a crude stan
d-
The éukanasa (Plate 555), well articulated on ;
ati in its low er sur asénaka.
ing figu re of Parv is a Sivalinga
garb hagr ha doo rwa y has two plain sakhas; inside the shrine
The west.
the projecting channel facing
fixed within a circular arghyapatta, the Par asu ram ésvara temple.
shri ne-m odel appe ars to be coeval with
The small
plan.
Fig. 105. Bhuvaneévara. Mohini temple,
temple, plan.
Fig. 106. Bhuvanéévara. Uttaresvara
-566)
ankara temple (Plates 563
Bhuvanésvara, Bhavani-S from the
exp ose d in a thi ckl y populated area not far
This temple has been par
tly pertains to
dus aro var a tan k. The part exposed (Plate 563)
Bin a. The temple seems
southwest corner of the part 0 ¢ the attached mandap
grha and
the east face of the garbha that bhadras are recessed
and karnas project out
unu sua l pla n in karna
to have had an Uma-Mahésvara while
The sou th bha dra harbours an image of its
(Plate 564). ;
re-
niches are empty. otapali mouldi ngs of the vedibandha are
the kal aga and kap two sak has ,
ma. The bhadra nichelalhas
On the bhadra ,
ku mu da and ard hva pad a
p in lalata and is sur -
placed by tripatta an d lot us-peta is. Its lintel has a pla r
+ ros ett es is fur the
embellished wit h padmalata. This niche
oa d pat tik a carved with luxuriant the base and
moun te d by a br
Ru ca ka pil ast ers ad or ned with ghatapallava ati embel-
enclosed by two broad designs, cap ped by a very broad pattika
amonds, and floral on the left).
capital, bands of di dh ap ad ma s (fl ank ed by a standing kanya
lished with large triang
ula r ar against two
) ris e ab ov e orn ate tulapitha. Udgamas set .
564
Karna niches (Plate he ad an d fig ures.
e 4 lio n’s windows,
levels of pent-roof fram ap a (Pl ate 563 ) sh ow s two unusually large
The east face of the ma
nd er stand-
d by a dis tin cti ve typ e of faceted plain pilast
with square perforati
ons, flanke tures of the
Mo ul di ng s an d other architectural fea
ting bas e. e been
ing on its owD projec gar bha grh a, and the whole seems to hav
the
mandapa do not matc
h those of enth century, as seems
poi nt. If the gar bha grha dates from the sev .
added at a later
y date from the mi d-eighth century A.D
likely, the mandapa ma
s 568-571)
Bhuvanésvara, Para
maguru temple (Plate
résvara temple. Decora-
nds just north o f the Sisi
stone te mple sta
This east-facing sand left uncarved. The
me nt s an d eve n par ts of mouldin gs have been
tive and figural orna
268 I1.D.3.
Kalinga style, phase 1,
5
valinga. Si
ipates the Sigiragvara te Bees thie
det mple in certain respec
and of luxuriant ts, the eighth
Century a.p, p atravalli, and is as signable to early in
Bhuvanésvara,
Pasciméévarg
All that has su
rvived of this
Bindusaré temple,
<
a. The cent pe
ral ratha of d by a alge
the gikha i
270 IL.D.3.
Kalinga style, phase 1,
RI
en
re
SS
a
‘a
SAILGDB HAVAS
adorned with a lata of candragalikas; the anurathas have discrete udgama pediments.
The shoulder course is broken and crowning members are missing.
The garbhagrha doorway has plain sakhas and leads to a Sivalinga inside.
)
Bhuvanéévara, Talésvara temple (Fig. 110d; Plates 577-579
has lost a major
This east-facing temple, ere cted on the bank of a now dried-up tank,
a high pitha, its védiba ndha (Fig.
part of its sikhara and jangha (Plate 579). Built above on the bhadras;
suppor ting the niches
110d) is interrupted by a lower set of mouldings suppor ting
and narrow patta
these consist of khura-kumbha, tulapitha, irdhvapadma, patrava lli that act
ghatapallava and
a pair of broad Rucaka pilasters embellished with with an image of
niche is intact,
as frame for the niche itself. The northeast karna an ornate tulapit ha; its
apadma above
Aja-Ekapada (Plate 579), and rests on an iirdhv
at the base and top, patravalli on the shaft, and
framing pilasters have ghatapallavas a
that contains a seated figure of Parvati and
support an eave and a crowning pediment
Images of Lakuliga and Ardhanarisvara
head of Siva in the gadhas of the gavaksas.
now in the State Museum, Bhubaneswar.
from karna niches of this temple are ern
figures alternating with chequer-patt
The varandika’s rapakantha contains ly surv ives ;
the first bhimi of the éikhara part
without a crowning kapotapalika. Only pres erve d toa
-dressed ashlar courses, however, is
the core of the gikhara, made of well Mane
greater height. with luxuriant
garb hagr ha door way (Plat e 578) has a broad sakha carved
The Saiva pratiharas and
mino r plain facets within. The pedyas had
patravalli with three s showed a
show s Gaja laks mi on the lalatabimba. Flanking stambhasakha a
the lintel by a chatra dharini, on the left, Ganga on
the right,
of Yam una ,; att end ed
graceful fig ure the shaft,
ed wit h gha tap all ava s at both base and top, patravalli on
s seated in niches and an ornate
and were embell ish
carved with Astagraha
and still support an architrave ming a base for a Sukanasa,
ota pal i; abo ve is a pla in kantha and ornate pattika for
kap
now lost. group represented by the
som ewh at advanced beyond the early l
This tem ple has complex in its architectura
eév ara , Sva rna jal ésv ara , and the Satrughnésvara the nex t pha se —
Paraguram anticipating
program, and decoration —
organization, iconographic A.D.
the early eighth century
and may be assigned to
7)
108, 111a; Plates 580-58
Kual6, Kanakés vara temple (Figs. inscriptions of
is the anc ien t Ko dalaka mentioned in the
Kualé, District Dhenka nal , ples. Three Sulki
of t Bh au ma -K ar a kings, as 4 city of tem
the Sulkis, feudatories he
stambha, and Ranastambha, of are pian wei eh pds
chie fs, Kaf ica nas tam bha , Kal aha Ranastambha describe
ple s to Sad agi va. An inscription .
tem
struction of numerous ms.
s lof ty te mples in glowing ter beac
i t
co mp le x (Fi g. 108 ; Plate 581), a hin
eat —
- gpa ans . con sis ts of the Ka nakesvara temp 4at t o h ne
valley m fee :
Kualo in the Brahmani the Lokanathesvara e
s at the corners: a (NE; oe ) me
beeen 8
four subsidiary temple 58 6) an d Ka pi lé sv ar p
W; Plate
Vaidyanathésvara (N va li ng as and were originally enc
losed by as
ca te d to Si
lite, all are dedi
Sieepaeevess pe a
bi ie g an old dil api dated temple called the 7rd ya
wepe cr i:
a ure cal led the Kanaka-Durga shrine, r a OF ins
modern improvised
str uct
ga (ac tua lly na g e spe
e of Ka naka-Dur y
thatched roof, The imag own as Kanakéévara (Plate 583), is now pra
The main temple, kn
seem more developed, aii styl-
ee.
arlier “T”-format. On ove
ings
still supporting anga, with vedibandha Senate
the bhadra’s cantoning Poet en
from a shallow
base comprising khura-k eae
patravalli, ornat
d by three gakhas embellis
ee
aSe
ES
Sakhas, embellished wn i atna,
omamented and 5 » Stambha, and érivrksa; ae
ments ornamented } a stambhaéakhas are ream ae
lintel divided into khanda-li
Ganga), another
karna niche s that have survived, one shows a river-goddess (possibly
only that of ten-armed
Ardhanarisv ara, and a third Siva or Harihara. Of bhadra-images,
on the south shows elephants.
Mahisasuramardini has s urvived (E). The rapakantha
of which three are extant on the
The éikhara appears to h ave had five bhimis, with ganas. inhab-
sakhas carved
southeast corner. The garbhagr ha doorway had three
on the lalatabimba, and a lintel relieved by
ited padmalata, and “Srivrksa,” Gajalaksmi sup-
ay is framed by ornate Rucaka pilasters
a scene of Sivalinga worship. The doorw a battle.
showing
porting a kapotapali and a recessed frieze
the south (Plate 586), a shallow Sukanasa
Above the varandika’s ripakantha on e.
the bust of Mahésvara in the gavaksa abov
shows Nataraja in its éarasénaka and only the vedi band ha has
the southwest corner,
Of the Pagciméévara shrine on
en ae
survived. the southeas t preserves its jangha,
shrine to
The north-facing Lokanathesvara
ya (W) in its bhadra niches. The
with Mahisasuramardini (E), Ganésa (S), and Karttiké
vara:
Vedi ¢. Bhavani-Sankara; d. Talesvara.
ig.
bak bandhas,b.Bane
Uttaresvara;
a. Mohini;
274 Kalinga style, phas e 1, I.D.3.
2
H
1
1
0
F.||.0
REFERENCES
Kirttivarma
(A.p. 566-597) Mangalésa
(a.p. 597-609/10)
Pulakééi II (a.p, 609/10-64
2)
Vikramaditya I (A.D,
oe
Vinayaditya {A.p,
681-696)
Vijayaditya (Av.
696-733/4)
Vikramaditya Il (4
.p, 733-744/5)
Kirttivarma 1
(av. 744/5-75
2)
aes
CHAPTER 20
Historical Introduction
Ghataprabha
f
@ Aihole oi :
Siddhanakolla
. Pattadakal
Mahakuta
KARNATA
30
2
9 5 10 20
MILES
10 20+ 30 40
i 0
Karnatadééa; Calukyas, Karnata-Nagara site
s.
279
CALUKYAS OF BADAMI: KARNATA
a grant
ription of Kirtti varma’s reign records
land to a brahman. An undated stone insc son was still a
tivarma died in a.D. 5 97/8 while his
to a Jaina temple by Kirttivarma. Kirt
minor. kesi II, was
(a.p. 597-610 ), who took rule as regent for his nephew, Pula
Mangaléga wanted
re his cor ona tio n by the nam e 0 f Ereya. It was soon obvious that he
known befo Kalacuri King Buddha-
his own son. After defeating the
to make the crown secure for 602 to record a sup-
d a dharmajayastambha in a.D.
ae in battle, Mangalésa inscribe god Makutésvaranatha. Now in
the Bijapur
a ed grant of ten villages to the pi. The exil Pulakesi Il
ed
at the sacred site of Makuta near Vata
te e it onc e sto od eld in Nadantru with
Man gal ééa in a.p. 609 /10 on the Elpattu-Simbhige battlefi ;
ed
sup por t of the feu dat ory Bana clan. kin gs. He greatly
the Calukya
éi II (a.p . 610 -64 2) is considered the greatest of l of the Kadam-
Pulaké avasl, cap ita
are a of Cal uky a dom ination, conquered Ban Gan gas in the
expanded the the
the m his feu dat ory , rul ed Révatidvipa, dominated and Mal ava
bas, and made a, Lat a,
, the Mau rya s of the Konkana, parts of Maharastr ied Seé ndr aka
southern Deccan the all
con que red the Nal as. He married a woman from ard han a
in the north, and ed an att ack by the North-Indian king
Har sav
he rep uls e to the
family. Before A.D. 612 éésvara.” Expansion of
his rul
-64 7), aft er wh ic h he was called “Param que red Pis tapura, near
(a.p. 606
low ed. By A.D . 616 he had con
ssa fol g Guntur
east and to parts of Ori und is. He als o def eated the Pallavas, winnin
Vis nuk ched both
Vengi, and defeated the (c. A.D . 580 -63 0). His rule by then had rea
and Nellore from Mahé
ndrava rm a a, in power
II pla ced his you nge r brother, Visnuvardhan
akesi
coasts. In A.D. 624, Pul ire. |
sta l section of his vast emp Visnuvardhana
a branch. By a.D. 631,
over the eas ter n coa
gov ern ed the Lat a”) that
Pulakaéi’s son Jayasimha
nt dyn ast y (no w oft en called “Eastern Caluky gi as |
independe hra Pradesh, with Ven
had become king of an e Dis tri cts of present-day And
and Nel lor
included Guntur Aihole was
capital. ow po pu la rly c alled Meguti) in
ndra temp l e (n who likened
In a.p. 634 the Jiné co mp os ed by the court poet, Ravikirtti,
g inscription ting the king’s
dedicated with a lon ri de gr oo m of vatapi” sugges
ké si Il “B lava clans
himself to Kalidasa.
He called Pula
tes tha t the Kés ala, Kalinga, and Pal
The inscription sta a, Kérala,
love for his capital. ate d the prosperity of the Col
he ha d cre akési in
were afraid of Pula
kesi II and that
ri m Hsi ian Ts an g re corded that he met Pul llary
e Chinese pilg raditya, ruled in
Be
and Pandya clans. Th si II’ s son s, Ad ityavarma and Cand
,
Pula ké
Nasik in a.p. 641. ceroys. tapi from a
of ea st er n Ka rnataka as his vi led in battle defending Va
District re nt ly kil an inscription
si II was appa The Pallavas left
In A.D. 642 Pulake ma Ma ha ma ll a.
snugopavarma
by Narasimhavar a inscription of Vi
Pallava attack led Ba da mi . A Pa ll av
yed Vatapi and
ory 0D a rock at Narasimha destro
recording their vict Sai nt Ag as ty a,
vas seem to have
event: “Like the the city.” The Pa lla
also records the by Pu la ké si in
glory, leaving the
ar of victory set up eded to restore its
captured the pill th e we al th ne t
and taken away
devastated Vatapi sc ur it y for c. 12 years. sc ur e. Ad ityavarma is
in ob records are ob
Calukya dynasty . 64 2 an d 65 4,
te to A.D. 643); he
m between A.D t (which may da
In this interregnu ist ric s wife, Vi-
in a grant from ¢ Adityavarma, hi
called Maharaja e Khaira
Abhinavaditya. Th
praises Varaha pa ramount
ems to mentions no
jayabhattarika, se ja r laimed ki ng . There is
issued by the Gu
grant of A.D. 643, 0
that this was a time n A.D.
ruler, suggesting twee
mple building be
no evidence of te
280 II.E.1.4-
Karnata-Nagara style, Karnatata,a,
e wall at
use in the Aihole Huccimalli temple in a.p. 708; in a.p. 713/4 the enclosur
temples his father, grand-
Alampur was built at his command — perhaps to protect the
g the act
father, and great grandfather had built there. (The large inscription recordin
tya also built temples
was written in Kannada and repeated in Telugu script.) Vijayadi
government to the west. He
at Aihole and Pattadakal, and he returned the centre of
into Karnata.
possibly brought architects and sculptors from Alampur
reque sted him to make grants to Jaina temples.
Vijayaditya’s sister, Kunkumadévi
are recorded, but which are not
The king made many grants to temples whose names son, Vikramaditya II.
requested by his
known to exist today, including some grants
r’s name, was crowned in a.p. 733/4. He
Vikramaditya II, assuming his grandfathe
the Pallava capital, three times (one raid
was famed for having defeated Kancipuram, the Rajasimhés-
II). During one raid, he saw
was actually led by his son, Kirttivarma iption.
red wealth, recording the act in an inscr
vara temple, to which he returned captu Aihole Durga temple and the
found on the
Inscriptions ascribed to his reign are at Aihole
templ e. An inscr ibed stone in the Jy6tirlinga group
Mahakita Mahakatésvara to the reign of
be ‘of his perio d. An inscr iptio n by a subordinate that refers
may ; enh
e at Bhadranayika Jalihal.
Vikramaditya II is found on a templ ly, Lok ama had evi and
of the Kalacuri fami
Vikramaditya married two sisters les buil t in his honor,
the two major Pattadakal temp
Trailokyamahadévi, and they had s emb ell ish ed with
The building of such vast temple
each called by the donor’s name. leaving it vuln erab le to
| the resources of the kingdom,
sculpture may have exhausted rule pass ed to the son of
amahadévi, bore no son, so
attack. The senior queen, Lok " ‘
ior queen.
Trailokyamahadévi, the jun not ie nave been
tti var ma Il too k rule in a.p. 744/5, he Sa er.
Alt hou gh Kir rose against him to claim pow
i ‘¢ Rastrakiita feudatories, who d taxes. His mos t e
rece nt
ed de e r, ee
mak e e
som e gra nts to temples an d collecte 753 Ras tra -
actépt
He did, how eve
757, although already in
a.D.
| ed February 6, A.D.
copper-plate grant is dat rds hip of the Deccan. No temples ee ey
had cla ime d ove rlo eve r, ene . e : ka
a Dan
kitins
by on ato the reign of Kirttivarma II. In a.D. 754, how
ptiurg
critid
es at : e site eo
tad aka l. Its ins cri pti on mentions three ne vyoH
kumbha pillar at Pat st fro m the north bank of
the oa
ved by an arti ie i : "4
states that it was car bui lt and ins cribed a gateway on
had ‘i
Dhruva , a Rastrakuta rul er, ple at Pattadakal may have een bui i
the aonineunidl at ‘Aleinpur, TB Jaina tem tes
| mer Calukya sites indica
h con str uct ion in Rastrakuta style at for
the same tim e. Suc the dynasty.
pa ti on of Ca lu ky a power and the end of
the total usur
|
\
Architectural Features Sandhara and niran-
le for the ir architectural diversity.
Calukya temples are re ma rk ab aisles. Many tem-h
on of pillars, creating :
borated through dispositiz
i ples at Aih ole, thoug
dhara plans are ela Lad Khan and Durga tem and
i correlation between5 plan
dee 1s to be littletempl
es 0: fat e e
d. There seems
superstructures, and es that otherw ise sugges t
sedapa
ae aog Ae as
-
654-660 and seems to have
) and Pinakapa Self (c. ap. 660- been the
of th e €xquis 2)
ite San,; (C. A.D. 690-709)
befor a
modest form temples seem to ilt
&xpansion, Sa me Sv ara. The Aiho have been e
Seems also to le Ca
kra temple, in e
4 :5.sssare e ave emulated its wae A
imitates Alampin,eqGeleth@2isnathearl
e Stoup belong th
the Sangaméé
c os A akula iste
vara m
a mp
templele’ ot
Agiiset wie ifMe
at SSiidd
d a yanarayana par
654.660), A > 68
(c. 9-
a.69
p. 6)690-
th at cl ea
e
rlfy
ha na ko ll a
dhra is
umara- 69 6) . T
Calu cons Brahmg temp
ave follion le at Alampu
o r (c. A.
eclipse of e e Nagar “UPers
a ‘Aa fe 4 tr uc tures in Andhra
Production ukya and Karnata se
V Kramadit € in a.p. 654. ems to
ya may h During the
eap 12-year
1 Motin ee red ;
vated to Bad n t a thhiatus in architectur a
eeop
e No rth Indian styl
e of
CALUKYAS OF BADAMI: KARNATA
NAT 283
coins se ee
——
ewes
ift to the Mahakitésvara
akitaé ing
temp le during ‘lt hishis reign.
reign. 18 temples o f
ee are built in Andhra, sugg esting
in Karnata, while only one
f the Calukya’s’ powe a ih agen e was, AE
r-base to the we stern Teg aod
tld to F Batronage bit. inc rease in privat .
iv
i
ate patro nage ma
i High, thriving, steady e eee * of temple patronage
The Tesult, however, is
, economy and an increa
sed popu Be Pera .
also a slight debasement tite. i
Vijayéévara and Jumbuling in the Pee eee ae
a temples, which had tions 0
the Vinayaditya te
mple-style and qu ;
roy al support,
architectural change. ality. After c. a.p th er e seems to be an
. 700
Temples in this peri :
od are of a fairly st
malli, Galaganatha, an andard size. i a ium-sized Hucci-
d Mallikarjuna temple by the absence :
exterior niches (per s at Aihole form *
haps Tepresenting an Th e Vijayéévara an
Durga temples are mult economic choice b
i-niched and both seem a bythe style oO
the Ki davélj Sangamégvara to have e ee = wo
though the Kudavéli temple (window an similar,
temple seems a prov d en ta b a see large,
temples follow the incial version). Su Pa ttadaka
style of Durga-temple oe aaa excell
Vijayaditya’s reign see images but with a ence.
s the last use of a gah Be with nine
Pratolis for the first ti Ph arhsana roof, tiers.
me appear, at Sulebh ae
The lotus meander is av i and beside the ur
used repetitiously on e itiat aicaraltovag
entablature of exterior temple beams; t he a
niches becomes flam dascadine to
either side; 8eomet boyant with long bu
ric pierced wi
w; ndows become re
shy tai
d Ows often have pi ct an gu
.
lar. (Whereas e arlier W -
in
erced d gril
geri les with lotus-
ral
» Sometimes
itects and
scu
i] ao iS: [o) f=] 3.
mn € know of Rév
ad
épanatha temple, an 4 ditva,
mple, d of Gunda, Baladé
va, and Adity
Ps
.°tvky der the final two
or it may be a ‘D. 733/4-757) mm Calukya ki' ngs, Viikrama-
ay be interpreted kra
i t the last ki as a sign of the . ess
t Dart of the > sma de ngs Preferred
to build
a ae
vo tion al| a few very
shriines.
ay date toa previous
ated in this period. ost
period, De tale
It also yee iA
8, Perhaps forYayéévara (Sangaméévara)
temple
fif; nanciaj l fe
asons, seems to been
have
CALUKYAS OF BADAMI: KARNATA 285
The
vimana walls have central bhadra niches
ages; these are flanked on the framed by pila; sters and w ith im-
karnas by shallow recessed ni :
which are eaves each suppor ches, coor aae: s er
ting a complex udgama. Over
gana-bearing garland frieze the bhadr
s.
The four-armed Varaha image
on the south bhadra (Plate
the early Cave-temples at 592) is‘ close to those of
Aihole and
The Ugra
and conch ab
Sangamésvara
ind iconography temple
that Was
( seems to have set a style both iin
Dedicated to imi
Sikhara. The Si
kh ara had a and a vimana with a aes
the Kittur Museum. gukanasa with an image
of Uma-Mahéévara now
The bhadra niche kept i
ph
8 Sik hara (Ple ate the Nagara sikhara.
with an © 595) ;
nasa at Maha ition of
a gy anasa.
amsana ro kiita. Ot It is the only
of and dupl her smal] Nagara sikh
icate the
three | ara
The Sahigama j i H e e
éya
Square shafts hay © an
and with Ma octagonal :
nibandha a ll pilaster S withith
dhanarigvara M s ne a
tarang
; a poot
tiikkaass.. Their
(W), and Siva fed H e e
Pag o e d wi
287
CALUKYAS OF BADAMI: KARNATA
ony a
S |
rae = Sso
= |
e
e Wa
B eh
PLEA NCCo ea
O
N
a=w semne
nae
ii
Fig.i12, Ai4h; ole, St
a
re
iryandray
ana temple 5M
& plan; b, Section
; ¢. elevati
on. (Courte : Micichhe ll
el .)
sy
289
CALUKYAS OF BADAMI: KARNATA
=
290 .E.1.a.
Karnata-Nagara style, Karnata a, Il
Pe,
Jambulinga and north ofoe
» oBinally both ates 604-606) y one in Karnata to be 7g
Pillared ‘ ¥
faulkhia- a ka design, as at Alampur.
Sikhara , tandapas, antar
amp
291
CAL UKYAS OF BADAMI:
A KARNATA
broad recesses.
niches on the karna faces, each with a
‘ .
Bh
adra niches are flanked
d .
by “blind”
: : ring nagas and purnaghatas.
api
tul ae oneply carved wit h ado the
of the outer wall of the mandapa has fallen; its base up to the level of
aren the presence of 22 nich es.
niche-tu elda is intact and indicates
A lapi (Plate 604). An
ico of the vima na reta ins an Andhakantaka image
south port um, Karnatak
of Nat ara j no w ke pt - the a
in Kalnnada Research Institut e Muse
ag
im : e : tar aja to be by the sa me
University, seems
= i b
3 w
in staiahidididedni
aes)
ds
SE
Pirie ws
i
Saat
e
SS ee
EE
ee
————
rin Se
Se
iz,
——P
C.
a eSce
en fo
“jae
eal econ
2 eel apes a es y: Michell.)
a, plan; b. elevation. (Court
ganatha temple:
Fig. 114. Pattadakal. Gala
292
a
Karnata-Nagara style, Karnata, IIE .1.a.
elated to this
a temple. One
ee : to the northeas
overhanging cli 1 8 Car an Ad iti shrine t is structural
ff. T ved in rel ief to th e so
if itself finite ; ut heast. a
the suivibse eae
iinion her back be
§ bud in either eene lotus-
hand; a cloth is
angles, ankletwo ven thro h her
s with tassug thighs and
are turned to el s, an d a channa-
Worshin show th
During an annual e soles. Her legs are drawn
a2
orshipped by festival held
ees ae (On women seekin on ipod
the path le g fe rtility. The
adin P the mountain ly ae
r to reach the
n the rock.) Ne oo
Th arby is a linget
the shrine ro va; the linga ig bathed by
otey subbr Spring water dripping ou
ine housing t of the
TS remai ig
o f he Main te
tania
—s=
i
Paégupati occupies iche;
the so uth nich
obscured east niche probably held
These images are a
that these are Poor rendition
of types :
Possibly unin
spired copies, Th common at co a ests
century.
e temple may re fuk eaouih
date to the
Aihole, Huccim
alli temple
(Fig. 116; Plat
The temple call es 608-610)
ed Huccimall; (t
large “T» emple of the craz est near a
The tank’s ri y lady) at Ai:ho w
temple; they
May be of th m is carved with figures le fa ce s
e Same date that seem later than the
of the mukha
m a n *Capa’s kaksas
d
as th © purna
k u m b
Sy
has and erotic figure a ded to
An inscriptio an a_ s d
to the temple n dated ap.
made by Elt 708/9 on the
provide West wa ll of the temple ‘ft of oil
records a ca
© quem for the ~ Sanction of Vijayaditya. The in
temp
» Small, squ
are windows (Plate naa in
8 topped by south. Th €
garbhagrha has no ia its
a kapotapali aga
me or namented with inhabited
ukanasa ig of the temp r, and kinnaras bet g a the
p le’s Nagar Ween, A kapétapali also
Perly atta a Sikhara eae (the
ched to th h ears an image of
e Sikhara)
.
jn eemgee
The style of this sculpture
295
CALUKYAS OF BADAMI: KARNATA
ae
falararara
(Courtesy: Michel
l.)
c. elevation.
section;
temple:
a. plan; »-
cc im al li
Fig. 116. Aihole. Hu
296 IL.E.1 a
Karnata-Nagara style, Karnatata,
P attadakal, Kadasi
ddhésvarg temple
(Fig. 118; Plates
612-613)
Mandapa has lo st temple at Pattadakal ig
lost its amalak
st its Toof; the
a nirandha
as been excavate
Southe d beneath t
is positioned on ga te mple are q deep stepwe
the axis to the ll anda large pratéli.
ale The
gate way
lateral
aisnava
, however, is an
(A.D. 733-744), inscrip
which has rec
ently been retransl
Aditya of the ated by K.V. pane to
temple of Komarasé es
ng
his Supporting argume ana by Réva
dedication to Si Taul tax.” In
le’
: nt for the ee thes
etached Surya images
from the area em
he round pitha,idapa door on the architrave, the Hae ts
designed to Tec
urya and Chay eive an image
a. rather
; Plates 616-61
8)
: 2d 1vided into th(Fig. 144 9; Plate 616)
taranga brackets Tee aisles by four has an open four-pillared pou
Preservin 8 Pillars and four
an origin al linga and pilasters ae
pitha. A large
a i-mandapa to Fie
the east. The walls e
e
eve @ varandikaa roo f (Plate 617) has sev
with two cornices en tie rs of vé ae
a amalaka an vijapt with plain
Ucaka porch Pil
lar raka finial. On pce aan
vara ya roan Maha the sukan
a svara,
holding mithunas, Ardhanari arié-
DI
|
TTT
l.)
i . (Courtesy : Michel
°¢. elevation
4 plan; b. section;
temple: Be
Figi . 119. i ole. Ma ]likarjuna
Aih
302
ata,
, e, Karnata, I.E.1.4-
Karnata-Nagara styl
aracteristic of g
Aihole,
303
eon a
SS———C—~—
5 M
0
Michell.)
b. section; °C: elevation, (Courtesy:
TarapPp@ temple: & plan;
F ig. 120. Aihole.
Aihole.
304 ata,
ata I.E.1.4-
Karnat a--Nagara style, Karnat ata,
iz Sr gS 9)ET
.2— a=| aoO Fe
— Eat]
SS SG
— SS
Ee es @|
Fig. 124.
ae nee
Aithole, Ca
laganatha 5 M
temp le:
&. plan;
p. Section;
€. elevation, (Cou
rtesy: : Mich
Michell.)
305
CALUKYAS OF BADAMI: KARNATA
P Be s 2.
attadakal, Papanatha temple (Fig. 122; Plates 624-627, 629)
t atha temple consists sofa
The Papan
Rep of mukhamandapa, large gudh
FN The pa: ne a
a ee Peeaee oyati pradaksinapatha (Fig. a ai
See is like that of the Pattadakal Jambulinga temple; the tall
surrounds the fop of the eT rs
ra aa : peieiner, A rae hara i
o have undergone majo hi ectur
jor archit
, pl
itt ea hi
twice, Then as probably consisted of a garbhagrha ae
of this early manda 2
ane ttadaka Jambulinga temple. A remnant e a
pradaksinapatha This sa
, partially blocking entry to the later
card €
. 4
dd
ndap wa s added. New walls were
been ore the present mandapa
ast removed bef of pradaksina difficult. oe aa
e to the sanctum walls, making performance images of Siva
th three exterior porticos holding
anes was modeled on Alampur, wi i ges of the Adi
i es held ima
i
a’ s wall-nich
ndapa’
mandap
etween window screens. : The -Brahma at Alampur). Sa n ae
n found on the Svarga and
found on the north (a patter of a larger eastern mandapa
second plan was also remodeled by the addition
porch. might place
stages of construction of the Papanatha temple
i These hypothetical stage two in nate
in c. A.D. 720-730 under king Vijayaditya, were carved on the
initial construction and windows
in c. A.D. 735-750. Niches
730-734, and the final stage older ones, each niche surmounted by a different
walls to match in sculptural styles, seams
added mandapa’s be discerned by differences
three stages can from hara to base.
udgama. These and south walls running
the north e misery
on the roof, and seams in
th wal l of the wes t mandapa records “th
An inscription on the
exterior nor has the face of
gifts, but not sufficien t ones, and who therefore to ing enough funds
of one who has received rstoo das the patron’s e
asakhog.” (It could be
unde there is a break wher
it is at a point in
located as
finish the temple, , Gajantaka, and
Bh ad ra images of Nataraja
work st op pe d. ) 734 the temple w
po rt ic os su gg est that by c. A.D. ence.
e from available evid mp le’s exterior is particularly
second-pha se
ca nn ot de te rm in
dedication we temples, this te also elaborately
co mp ar is on to other Calukya Vi gv a-Brahma temple,
By e Al am pu r sculpture
ulpture. Th d the pattern for
encrusted with sc mple by comparison, yet establishe howeve r, th e Papa-
ornamented, se
ems si
pa na th a. Ar ti st ically speaking, re scheme
nt
llowed on the Pa er e is a lack o f a cohe ure is also
and ornament fo rm er mo de ls ; th
generation from fo ality of the scul
pt
natha seems a de sc ul pt ur e on the walls. The qu
dance of
and an overabun Natésa,
rt ic os th at house images of
uneven.
plus th ree bhad
ra po seven north,
There are 34 nic hes east, two west,
istributed four lls of the
ak a, a th e no rth and south wa
An dh ak da nt
the e Iso are sculptures
th of
and sev en sou
six on pattern composed
west ma nd ap a; and ad va nc ed , ith intertwined
hes . Vat aya nas are par ticularly an d pa ir ed n
between nic ted vyal as ,
other of moun The simp
62 5) ca n exemplify.
ka (P la te temple.
pe d fo un d o n the Viruipaksa al frieze 0 f fighting
lions
mo st de ve lo an an im
resembles the t
icos includ e
p and ththee Pattadakal
The moulding s of | pe, the
lik e th os e found on th
e
pl an is Al am pur-like in ty
and elephants much e res of
ju na te mp es. Although th il la rs have relief figu
Viraipaksa and Mallik
ar amples
en ma de by Al ampur cr
a t like Alampur ex
temple has not be ikra ma ,
ruda a nd Triv
gods, such as Visnu 0 n Ga
306 Karnata-Nagara style, Karnata,
a Il .E.1.4.
a | a a
be area temple
the ae ba? t. This type of pil
ck, andaceon
he western mand block, and a cusped,
sant ee
ed shaft, square olu and at
he-pillar at Sa
tyav of th ee
those
62 uting,
the eas ter n ma ns da pa (Plate
k (he re un ca rv ed ), lotus facets, kirtti-
Pillars of se octagonal shaft, large bl bracket carved elaborately with
oc
with a square ba w a large cusp ed beamsaleare no longer
etl a round d cus jephant-lions below the Nle
ae).
, and e r Calu
hee e xye a temp
le ap in g VY kn ow n fr om nofote
mukhas. The i d anim. als vals ((a
feature
ly bu st s, bu t full-bodie is “devoid of
mere
ap a ha s
The eastern mand e Visnu P : g cu
Ga ja la ks m! . Th of Sa rp an a kha’s nose bein apala on the
raja, an d
sig ned t he scene ; is o kn ow n from the dvar
fear.” Baladéva also
the south porch: hi . Opposite,
and the dvarapala of b
ine at the Sa f the south wall |
math porach. has 4 Ganésa shr n seems to |
VirapaFT aac sou
ksa’s ndap m of the demo
aya I hi ;
ra ma rd in i is sim ilarly enshrined i ers. The entrance doorway
Mahisasu , the reign of Vikr @
tw o pi last
and
}
o pe po tt ed ay eedpillars
rapaksa garbhagrhe.
have became f hat of the Vi
and very like t
(Plate 629) is ornate
308
ata-Nagara style, arnasta
Karnata-
ta, , IL.E.1.2-
Karn.
TSS Re
Fig. 123.
Athole, Hu 5 M
ccapayya templ
8; a plan;
p. Section;
c. elevation. (Courtesy . Michell.)
: Mic
309
CALUKYAS OF BADAMI: KARNATA
REFERENCES
‘ f India, Indian
i Archaeology, A Review,
R. 961), 41-44, i 1967-68, 1968-69, 1 969-70.
Ee ie “The Date of the Lad Khan ihole,” ‘ Lalit: Kala,
la, 10
(Surya-Narayana) Temple at Ai
et cea Bolon, “The Mahakuta Pillar x aN a
Carol Radcliffe Bolon, “The Parvati and Its Temples,” Artibus Asiae XLI (1980), 253-3-326.
Temple, Sandur and Early Images of Agastya,” 23 Artibusi Asiaiae, XLII
Spee He
fey ane Report on the Anti
quities in the Bidar and Aurang istricts, London
James Burgess, Report on the abad Peay Bud 1878. Lon
e Diets!
First Season’s Operation in
the Belgaum a
don
1874,
Moti Chandra, Stone Sculpture anal
in the Prince of Wales Museum
Henry Cousens, “Ancient Temple , meee oe ‘Annual Rep
s of Aihole,” Archaeological Sur ort, 1907-08,
189-204. vey of ,
Henry Cousens, The Chalukyan Rey ee
Architecture of the Kanarese
D.P. Dikshit, Political Histor Brae Calcutta
y of the Chalukyas of Badami
Odile Divakaran, “The , Delhi 1980.
Beginnings of Earl
Odile Divakaran, “Le tem
ple de Jambulin
James Fait hful Fleet, “Dynasties
of the
ons at Badami,” Su
mmaries of Papers
Kirit Mankodi,
, ed. RN, Dandek
ar, Ne of the 26th Intern ional Congress
“Ganga Tripatha w Delhi 1964, 151 at iona
George Michell, ga” Artibus Asia .
“Dating an Impo e, XX XV (1973), 139-140.
Oriental Art, 19/2 ant Early Calukyan
(1 97 3) Monument: The Pa ta
George Michell,
“Datin g the Maha
, 1- 9 panatha Temple Pa dkal,”
George Michell, kitegvara Temple
Early Western Cé
Orge Michell, “T lukyan Temples, at Mahakita,”
he Gauda Temp London 1975,
Architecture,” le at Aihol
George Michell, i
George Michell,
«
1 (1972), 47-69 Bamesvara Temp » Architectural Review, 41 (1972)
le , 153-160.
Art and Archaeology Research Pap ers,
Genealogical Table: Ca
lukyas of Badami
Kirttivarma
(A.p. 566-597) Mangalééa
(a.D. 597-609/10)
Pulakééi IT (A.D.
609/10-642)
Vikramaditya I (A.D.
654/5-681)
Vinayaditya (a.p.
681-696)
Vijayaditya (A.D.
696-7 33/4)
Vikramaditya II
(4,p, 733-744/5)
Kirttivarma [y
(A.D, 744/5-752)
ist hoy,
CHAPTER 2 1
© MATA BUBNAGAR
Tungebhadra pr.
Alam pur 9 Kudavéli
KURN GL eY
@ Bandatandr apadu
eKadama rakalava
Panyam e © S atyavo dos
Mahanandi
315
CALUKYAS OF BADAMI: ANDHRADESA
aditya’s rei i
In the early years of Vi Serie teh
ie z aie eae
over Kurnool, Coadueanl Pevens gach
a Tene oe Haeetalt pine a:
dalapadu, Talamanchi, and Turimell
See ge aa eee ‘ee
ee came into conflict with Pallava , i Saat
Paramésvaravarma
and inflicted a defeat on Pallava eee cae ee
the Pallavas were ee
Pallava territory as Uraiyur, where i Guja rat ce
with ae
its capit al at
k s was set up in
sey rate branch of the Caluukya
forces. _AA sepa . ‘
od.
Navasari (Nagasarika), in this peri a peaceful and
who succ eede d Vikramaditya in A.D. 681, had
Vinayaditya, dition to the north durin
inscriptions refer to his expe
prosperous reign. Dynastic clear . Insc riptions se
“Vajrata,” whose identity is not
which the Calukyas vanquished the religious endowmen ts of Vina yaditya.
Andhra record
Alampur and other places in the throne in A.D.
son and succ essor of Vinayaditya, ascended
Vija yadi tya, the ration of his empire
asso ciat ed his son, Vikr amaditya Il, in the administ patronage than did
696. He reign receiv ed greater
ug ho ut his lo ng rule. Pattadakal in his the re by Vijayaditya. An inscri
ption at
th ro mp le wa s ere cte d
svara te
Badami and the Vijaye
718 records his stay- in A.D. 731, and
Calukyas invaded Kanci tained an Arab
Alampur dated a.D .
Vik ram adi tya , the
Under the yuvaraja, II succeeded his father
in a.D. 733. He con
ram adi tya d the Pallava king-
levied tri but e. Vik
In A.D . 741 /2, his son Kirttivarma II invade proclaims his hold
invasion on the north. the Rajasimhesvara temple at Kafcipuram inscription at
dom; his inscription
in
gif ts of gol d to the temple. From a Calukya.
tions quered Kanci thrice
over the city and men Kir tti var ma may have con 744, Rastrakita
——————————
Pattadakal, it see ms tha t
g, as ce nd ed the throne in A.D
final Ca lu ky a kin dermined Kirtti-
Kirttivarma II, the ra re gi on in A.D . 742 and slowly un
752, Dantidurga
y held the Ello ces. Around A.D.
Dantidurga alread no rt he rn pr ov in
rma continued to
over all the ign ruler. Kirttiva
varma’s authority hi ms el f so ve re ¢. 4.D- 756.
and proclaimed le had ended by
conquered Badami from his own territory, but Calukya ru the systematic orga
niza-
rule for a few years, ‘o d was due both to tude of the community.
in th atti
Temple-building ‘o d an d to a general theistic in which both
of re li gi ou s se ct s in i
el ig io us an d cultural activities
tion io -r
en
The temple became th play ge of the construc-
me rc ha nt s
royalty an d an
Vikramaditya I's a temples at
d Vi he support of the
co rd
Inscri pt io ns re ra hm udalapadu
e Ar ka -B ra hm a and Svarga-B ev id en ce d al so from the Am
tion of th in Andhra is
lt y fo r Pa su pata Saivism as the initiato
r of
roya () Suda rg an ac ar y@
l onee
ucti of t
coenstria
he d th ro ug h th eSe aditya’s queen e construc-
firmly establis to by th e tae a
ac te d as patron for th
te d ya di ty a ence of
ity i
v e s ‘ s successor, Vija s in 4. D- 713. The prroromin
temple.eVi e na y@
r grouP of
te mp le Kurnool
Br
l ahema e
ou nd th e Al am pu ti on fr om Bh airavakonda in Maha-
ar crip pur and
tion of a prakara rther indicat te mp le walls at Alam a on the San-
s is fu do n
the Pasupata caryas © South In di
mes of pagupata for t Colas, a feudat
ory of
District, by na iction of La ku li ga e Re na nd u
s of th va as
ak as am Di st ri cts, refer to Si o-
: papah, and Pr area and the icon
gamesvara temp
li ng in Kurnool}, udda s 1
. thig
akta,
the Calukyas
ru
of Sanmata deities
wa Saiva, Vaishnava,
wors .
Lakutapani. The D ,
graphic sche ty ima
@
a, and Ganapa
Kaumara, Saur
ll
316
A hra, IL.E.1.b.
Karnata-Nagara style, And
In nd
thap
e aearl
anyd phPradaksinapatha.
: Sait of Mu khacatuskis
®
the fyer ge Biolass
Svarga-Brahma, AN Millapracaa.'s
ine P9248 in the Bhadragavaksas are invariably placed on
later Phase, an arra a
other Notewort° hyre-entrant ang] ngement first seen
features of a e ber of aisles in the on a
’ )Sva-Bra 4 ©xterior of the Pillared mandapa, an
hma,and Pa Sarbhagr
ha and prasada, d 3
™a-Brahma.- h ampur temples such as
Panyam, Mahana ni also are of the on apaaat 4
ee a |‘arger scale
nal, and Sa Ya tha
volu algo intr n earlier temples.
oduce bhadrag
avaksas.
ANDHRADESA a
CALUKYAS OF BADAMI:
ra at
ahma at Alampur and the Sivanandiéva ta-
The adhisthanas of th e Kumara-Br tripatta kumuda, antarapatta, and
kapo
Kadamarakalava consist of khur
a, kumbha,
the Vira-Brahma
win g infl uenc e 0 f Mad hya dééa at Alampur is evident on
pali. The gro hern védi-
ch disc ar d trip atta kumuda in favour of kalaga (a nort
and Bala-Brah ma, whi the Bala-
on). The use © f tula pith a is noticed for the first time on
bandha conventi least the fifth
kala sa mou ldi ng is wi desp read in North India from at
Brahma. The use of ear ly form on the Parvati
temple at Nacna
ile en co un te re d in an and
century; tulapitha, wh and eighth-century tem
ples in Madhya Pradesh
nu mb er of sev ent h- or Karn ata. In Karn ata,
and on a
r in Dak sina Kosala, eastern India,
Rajasthan, was not popula ra recess.
en include a broad kandha at Alampur and Mahanandi
;
védibandha mouldings oft co me s a reg ula r fea tur e
tha be at Sat ya-
In the later phase, tulapi da can be noticed at Panyam and of kalasa found
pat ta ku mu at Ai ho le is
the persistence of tri An dh ra of the broad kandhara comm
on
ad orn the
ce in le s
volu. The only instan r te mp
te at Satyavolu. Late
da vyala,
ara, 4 temple of a later kirttimukha, makara,
on the Bhimalingésv d Kr sn a an d wi th
the Visva-
| ratives of Rama an ch carvings on
tulapitha with nar pat ter ns. Su
workmanship those
d vegeta l
s, and floral an quality and excel in
musicians, dancer pe rb in Ge
-Brahma are su and Pete. by
Brahma and Garuda le s at Ai hole, Mahakita, a ie bs om
Nagara-style te mp Va ale
that are found on
in the ear ly ph as e exhibits a gradual The earliest te ple,
The kati of temples Nagara as well as Dravida traditions. Cas
follow vatayana a
and decorationa, uses 4 simple pilastered wall with
Kumara-Brahm dard formati at “t s y
t Alampur intro-
| ti me of Pu la ke si I,
that, from the oer ge a seen on
| Be gi nn in g W?
yana, Cikkig udi , etc .). and the Sivanandisvara
ani l -
le ai e with bhadrava
duced khattakas, e rahma, t Ka daveli dispe nses er of khattakas
r gam' agvara
Saan
tem
Spek et : the numb
diBigabove the
j mp os ed
ew
@
irel by a Sura sé na OF sinbhakerss
:
nv
:
a P e in tl Ee
to nine. Khattakas are i 1s oa j
ra -B ra hm a, a" elaborate pesFa -, citra-,
@ the Vi ‘ :
= A
y Dravidian motif ee the carving
i plo is tirsta 1introd
uce:d
lege eae i y isa
f temples of the earl
At Kud ave lis s a sjav a and the San-
puspa-toranas. he top o :
flanking vicy@ s
of ananiale with isva ra tem ple a" ala, In contrast, on temple
T Si
ia tke ‘Arka-Brahma. Kudavéli use bhutamala an
at
neither ee aa
ple
Se
——
gaméévara tem
at Aih ole and Mah aku ta, ee
in And hra dés a present a new am
temples
is clearly 2 tifs he Svarg a-Br
ahma. The
Madhyadéésa tradition l-design
; oP t
decor ve aN
d this wal
ghantamalaala, and otherAlam pur pet neybak walls become @ standa
rd feature in the Ne
tayanas and by temitanhu
The architects at re as on mo st or na d
uce am ma }§ th e
bhadragavaksas introd a- Br ah mp le s
by tae and later ke 2
phase. The kati
1s
ta ma laa. 5 amodel by larger a” ordered thre
a ghan eate
ous effort to cr
| nas, salabhanjikas, ee ts. Y
at l el emen ee
evolved templeaéA an hitect omand
scu lpt
ei
uraan ar ch ai sm ref lec tin g @
Brrahm santios of its arc
(Garuda--B r in jek hag Alampur. The iva
l a g SJ am pu cake ”
¢ features eve.loThe Ramalingesvara temple
dimensiona l j
j
Other centres than nd ghantamala
m; th ey on ly slectivey ea a iia
vincial idio adra :
am ac ce pt s
temple at Pany
ee
319
CAL UKYAS OF BADAMI: ANDHRADESA
allava
pillar is seen on the bh
3 a adragavaksa of the m: 6 Of
in the standard
gh at
e r c e cotemp
tem le at tyavolu.
le at 4Saat a
eee ap al la va type are fo
E-
e_
etimes lack the cubi un d in the
cal po in troduce mi un
on the upper portion, rtion and others sage on thth a o
e Durga
re ca ll in g a as
cane ee
i i . Anew illar-ty
pe was introdu
se Visva-Brahma
Wan a at th
e base and an amal of the shait.
f the nave at Alam aka at ne ie ae
pur usually carry s panels.
ws padmaéila in lotu
s ts carved floral
the centre with and
ieee Mina
the vitana (a feature -basti and
le, which in turn recallingn the a
are reminiscent
he garbhagrha is of ane o
Alampur, the Sahgam Squa e
éévara at Kudavéli re and fairly high. a at Mahanandi,
at
however, the ling , and the Mahana
a has no pitha. n
To summarize,
early Caluk
centrated at A
uk nd Pilaster
s ar
tendrils an tagrasa and valljj,
g thamrgas The t
;
he top mem Curls. The
&w preserv lint
el j
Vintage, th
ou the wall, C e
omprising
Sali ut
ol Sikhara ig tgraha of the vajana itara, vajana, and kap6ta
= , are of Dr avida
Er ttasalas Wh ribhima an 8 Nagara type
d dvi-anga, T .
» The saic h p in unin
lilantarMa tegrated. The he madhyal
apex. The as di karnan ata is BOM d of
sk andha and isplay da
kas of the ve pse ch o
pid z bala anj ’ nukoga mark
anaphalaka Theemmadhyalata =
Pahjara n udgama ea
are not differ has a t its
entiated. A a iva and
circular griv
a a
CALUK YAS OF B ADAMI: ANDHRADESA
.
é temple, plan
r nara-Brahm
Alampur. Ku
Fig. 124.
322
Karnata-Nagara style, Andh
A ra, I.E mbs
of fie garbhagrha
y an aMala]ka) at the
Alampur, Arka
-Brahma Figs
. 125, 128b;
Jagati, this( te
ry he Plates 636, 63
9, 643
aa . Ni o mple measures
oyhatha wi
th ambulatory c, 59 x 35 ft. and cons
, jt has no mu is
ditya I (A.p . ae
‘D, khacatuski. ts of a aes
ee
81). Th e is a
e temple grisanin
t made by Anivar
Inscribed ie
Stha is ar ecen 4Tuinous Cond ita Vikramaditya, i.e.
ition; the si Vi
adly mutilated, t restoration,
the TOof of th khara is lost, kram
e nave is lost and the
and the nich
es are
hee ; ©ach
made of three Se
wall is . a are ctions showing
carved with lotu trellises framed
“mbellished with Shan ses, elephants, and ganas. The
Th tamala and is surmou
Saa khag7 e deSU dham d,
co.ratean
d . wi nted by 4
th do
sapa
Patralata,. al pa
tranePaed format an
or fr am
berry
d consists of fii ve
’
’ Ss
ambha, and palmette. The
CALUKYA S OF F BADAMI: ANDHRADESA
.
a-Brahma temple, plan
Fig. 125. Alampur. Ark
324
A hra, ILE.1.b.
Karnata-Nagara style, And
_|
t_|
_|
_|
|L a
.
mple, plan
vira-Brahma te
Fig. 126. Alamp ur.
326
A dhra, ILE.1.b.
Karnata-Nagara style, An
he southeast at the
Patta kumuda site (Plate 650). Th édiban-
kapétapali moulding e aN kati
ith a lave pilasters are of Ruca s are visible. kapota
-
decorated with a lar ka
type and
doorway to the shcarirry i s three
ge Candragala. The
napatti. The over ne ha ¢ gala,
door shows a hara
ara 4 h has B 0
shrines on the a gukanasa and crowning ‘ =
amal aka.
horth, all]
Th e yaste
is a fj e-storeye
a fiv q Pharhsana
crowned by amal fed
Present on the Side wal Ukanasa aka and kalaga.
ls. w h ;
Which ext Over i
€nds up to the third bhami,
Khattakas @ re
327
CAL UKYAS OF BADAMI:
ADA ANDHRADESA
ra temple, plan.
. Si vanandisva
Fig. 127. Kadamarakalava
328 A hr a, [I.E.1.b.
ata-Nagara style, And
ar ay
Karn
i)
ay
|
dlava.
¢. Vira-Brahma; : d. Kadamarakala
329
SA
CALUKYAS OF BADAMI: ANDHRADE
e has three
the fourth, five-storeyed. The fifth shrin
The third is four-store yed; e shrin es featu re tripatta
storeys and is crowned by a
double amalaka and kalasa. Thes ways are
triga kha door
a nd khattakas on the walls. Their
kumuda in the védibandha the over door . The Pham sana
w a ala, kiitas, and panjaras on
projected in front and sho
ed profile.
gikharas have straight-edg also survive.
, wit h Kuta an d Pharsana forms,
Another 22 models
ple (Plates 652-657)
Ktdavéli, Sangame évara tem
lage at the confluence of
was sit uated near the Kudaveli vil
The Sangam ésv ara tem ple ed that the temple
rive rs. Rec ent excavations have reveal
the Krsna and Tun gab had ra stands above remains of
orn ate prakara (Plate 652) and
was surrounde d by a hig hly nsplanted to Alampur since
Thi s temp le has now been tra ic
earlier brick str uct ure s. Srigailam hydro-electr
n be su bm er ge d un der the waters of the
Kadaveli will soo
project.
faces east and m
This sandstone temple and garbha
4 gudhamandapa, antarala, e kati on the east has
prasada comprising
ed of up an a, jagati, and pattika. Th ;
The adhisthana is co
mp os
e of the do or wa y. On the sou
buted to either sid kas. The absence
four khattakas distri (Pl ate 653 ); the wes t wall has five khatta as a vatayana
kati features nine kh
attakas
Ev er y alt ern ate khattaka is used
is worth not ing . The khattakas are
of bhadravalokana el, or chequer pattern.
ate 656 ), whe sthana fol-
in section with a mala ida order,
ika (Pl
incorporating eit squ are OF oct ago nal
broad; the pilasters
are either ments are of Drav
ku mb ha , an d potika. Niche-pedi rana, éala-, and
lowed by lasuna,
tat i,
an a (Plate 657), hamsa-to
y of toranas: ma ka ra -t or is carved under the
displaying 4 variet lot us stalks. Bhitamala
g kinnaras ho ld in g r intervals from
citra-torana showin Ma ka ra pra nal as project at regula
well as vidyadharas.the roof.
upper kapota as from consist of vénu-
the kapota to drain off water lacks Sukanasa. Angas sa
tu rb ha ma éi kh ar a is dvi-anga andara-recess es. Each bhami of the venuko
The ca it h sa li lant ya la ta , a
oad madhyalata,
w . In the madh
udgama on the upper cornices grat ed.
he bottom and an ntinues to be uninte
ion but the design co at ed by undif-
he sikhara is termin
‘ ie
by an amalaka.wa y, fe at ur in g Ganga
plain tr isakha door
ferentiated skan tered through a and Padmanidhi
The gidham an da pa is en
g fi gu re s of Sankhanidhi
ttak as be ar in The pillars are
a m u n a; at :
ll ar s ea ch su pport the large hall. d with muk-
d Y rows of four pi
e mo stly decora
te
fa doorway: Four a ty pe s: Th e malasthanas ar up pe r part of the
Z ka-b ha dr ne ls are carve d. Th e
feo Oa d Ruca nd da nc e- pa eferred.
ether
i iga-brackets are pr
and stylized
ra mo ul di ng ca rrying candragalas adorns
ndha
si m he ends. A padma
though plain, ha s row of
over the peripheral
A sloping roof rests
a, puspa,
sa kh as de co rated with patralat
s fo ur a mithuna.
mb s st an d Ga ng a and Yamuna with The
ja flank the doorway.
nidhi
a
and panijaras. , lingapit ha in the
d ara of Sala, kutas, has a short, square
hee
The garbhagrha,
centre.
E.1.b.
330
Karnata-Nagara style, Andhra, Il
an.
arga-Brahma temple, pl
Alamput Sv
Fig. 12 9,
A
Karnata-Nagara style, Andhra, Il E.1.b.
Sev
Jali (Plate 672), - Pillars in
and the elaborat the khattak
© embellishmen io
t of e tulapi n of udgama crowning the kh
tha of the kh attaka have no arallel.
arvas and Vi h figures and para t
dyadh of th e up
i i per par
a. No image is
mber of the gikhar
co-
garasenaka. way of four sakhas de
in th gukanasa’s «T-shaped door res of Ganga and
pe and patralata; figu gures
fi
Life-size pratihara ddle
da on the lalata. th e mi
on imhakarna in
Yamuna appear ve is ds.
y. The architra wned by amalak
a a
flank the doorwa i wi th gh at apallava at base
flanked by = panjaras d a h
The giadhamangap? hapada at the base and an ama
some pi
amayana on
es
display them st others. and naga medal-
ee as 00 mo th e un der side. Padma
and mala-vidya
dh ar
ted with patral at The side aisles have a sloping roof.
a on
ar nav e. overdoor
The beams e decoreceilings of the
he at of th e gi id hamandapa. The
lions are carved vee
0 ‘jar to th er end with
a ng at ed amalakas) at eith Ganésa.
Siva-Nataraja and d on
°
The doorway ha s fi gu re s of
na shr > te
presents Lati dharinis moun
in th e ce ntre: t ca rr y fi gu res of camara
an udgama 0 yerdoor
pi la st er s flanking the
Tall
ll
334
------5
ten= pe 229-9909
pier R er joes
aoa t=
elephant-hea
ds.
The védiba
ndha of the
ence that it sh garbhagrha r
o WS amore Prom sembles
udgama Ped inent kal that on the exterior :
iments, asa. The Sanctuary’s with the diiffer-
Inside the khattakas are
is preserved at
garbhagrha are
four Pil topp ed by
the centre. lars that s
A lampur, P Upport the ceiling. A square lingap
Bs itha
adma-Brah
This last of ma temple
the A ampu
(Fj
Catures wh r temples
ich bear ag is muc
isc usseq in ain On t damaged,
he Tis
n Architect a l aganatha Sing its sikhara, but introdu
| ces
ural Feat t em Ple at Pattadakal,
ures” Section It has b een
B.R. Prasad
335
6 anh wm
ALUKYAS OF BADAMI: ANDHRADESA
.
Supplementum 8)
a temple (Plates 677-67
Bandatandrapadu, Siv a Pradesh, has a sma
ll
d c. 12 mil es fro m Kurnool in A ndhr h ant ara la an d
a locate a wit
Bandstand
all y con sis ted of a nirandhara gar bhagrh ma nd ap a.
gin a Rastr akuta pillared
iva temple which ori is now replaced by ).
po rc h wh ic h d kapota (Plate 677
perhaps a sma ll
ed of khu ra, kumbha, kalaéa, an har a; thi s has
is comp os ug h the sik
The vedibandha at continues up thro i hes contain
ll sh ow s a ce nt ra l ng an ea ve . Th es e bhadra nic
the wa s suppor ti
framed by pilaster mardini (N).
projected niches ya (W ), and Mahisasura showing a reces-
images of Ganésa
(S ), Ka rt ti ke
ro of of seven tiers, eac h
idal Ph am sa na a sq uare Dravi-
of culminates in
Plate 677). The ro gukanasa projects
over
al te rn at
sed vedika l ama arly Calukya
ned by a smal
dian sikhara crow temple repr
The ian éikhara.
the antarala. am sa na ro of, and Dravid a. The gakhas and
péedya
gu ka na sa , Ph la la ta bi mb
architecture of has d as
da gaq--busts. There
are four
doorway human na ao
The garbhagrha h, but include
scure pina. b ut sculpture an
d
figures are ob gr ha an d a li ng feature,
rbha Rastrakuta the sikhara, li ke
pillars in the ga wa is t 0
The co ns tr ic te d
© f the Taraka-
ral de ta il s be ar
other architectu placement.
May. be a re be dated c. A.
the mandapa, at Alampur, this temple may (Figs. 132, 136b
-c; Plate
Br ah ma te mp le a te mp le s
Bhimalingesvar
Ra ma li ng és vara and plan.
Satyavolu, mp le s of nirandhara the
ga ra te
676) to show Na , the smaller,
on ly sit e in Andhradésa rg er is the Ramalingesvara
Satyavolu is the e la s. Th
ha s tw pr in cip al temple and garbhagrha
. Védi-
The site pa, antaraa la, of the
a.
Bhimalingésvar esvara consists 0 an d ka po ta pali. The walls ksa
The Ramali ed of khura, kumbha
ng , kalaga, s ea ch ha v e a bhadragava
wa ll fo an
r
a n d h a is c ompos ; th e g i idhamandapa d with no space a bove
b ingle khatta
ka
ntaras are
f
r o m a vedika. Salila
ng
Siva-Nataraja an
cea
si
a 1S tall, ri
:
c a t u r b h ar bo ur s
nudg e dvi-anga
es and a ‘
Th aras- T va as
h pa la pa nj
doorwa y wi th a gandhar ed
adorned wit n d b h u m . q tr ig ak ha w, s u p p o rt
to the seco 3 ; d roof is lo dha-
is €
dhamandanpe4 P raattiiharas 0? the ja
mbs. to that of gu
a d e an ta ra Ja is similar a li ng ap itha
Thee d horne he d o o r w a y of th te ri or p i ll ar s and has
th four in
aller in
ara but is sm
osed
re. ei isthana is comp
in the cent e" * p e e fi gu re s of
e Bh im al in gesv rb ha gr n4 a is a
Th ote of ga kandha ra ides
: : : s sta. The d wi th
® It consi adorne
dimension
th vyalamala. th Garudasan a Visnu
wi the
d ar dh ap ad ma in boxe s on
T a0
la is &” lled flowers
The antara s f four-peta
rnba
as Jalatabi
jambs.
337
CA LUKYAS OF BADAMI:
ADA ANDHRADESA
ngésvara. The
a is dvi bht ma but othe rwis e resembles th at of the Ramali
The éikhar of Nataraja.
;
cov ers th e enti re leng th of the antarala, carries an image
gukanasa, which and featureless.
la and garbhagrha are asty lar
The interior of the antara idi ary shrines of which one with
a capakara
ple s are six s ubs
Around these two tem eworthy.
plan and gajaprsth akara eleva tio n is not
plan
v ara temple,
Bhimalingées
Sat yavolu.
Fig. 132.
5b) rbha-
te mp le (Figs: 13 3, 13 sts of gudha
mandapa and ga
Panyam, éi va consi dibandha is
dilapidated.
now of th e pr asa da. The ve The
hara temple, : on eac h side ik a, and kapotapali.
This old sand a dragavaksa da , na tt
prominent bh ipatta kumu ntamala, here an
grha, with a andhara, tr
er s, te rm inates in a8 ha
hes nor pilast ks. amala-
nd peacoc of il e, an d is crowned by
has a ta I
pr is absent.
d gama. Sukanasa s
y Rucaka pillar
nd carr y
saraka. The
The gu hort
0
show a pair evol d of niches but
ck
heavy roll-bra f the garbha-
alli
ly with patrav re 0 the
yéedibandha
comp
nd h va s and a figu and preset Vv es a square
ja with ga four pillars
has g hantama tana supp? ted on
vi
grha has a flat
centre.
00 0060802 :’~S ee —————— —————— eee = —————— Ty
338
|
q
CALUKY AS OF BADAMI:
A ANDHRADESA
an.
ra temple, pl
Mahanandisva
Fig. 134. Mahanandi.
340
ar eM
Karnata-Nagara y
style, A
Andhr a, ILE.1. b.
aa La
~ sedi cc,
anandi, Ma a; b, Panyam
hanandigy, . Siva;
Ta,
341
CALUKYAS OF BADAMI: ANDHRADESA
F.LL9
c
b
©. Satyavolu.
Fig. 136. Vedibandhas: b. Satyavolu. Ramalingesvara;
a. Alampur. Garuda-Brahma,
Bhimalingésvara.
h is
dhanaphalaka, whic
ata outstrips the pi
second bhimi.
pafijara in the salila e su ka nasa reaches the dapa of a
rc at ed fr om the skan dh a. Th
the nor th, th rough a mukhaman ur pillars.
de ma fr om fo
dapa is entered dditional row, of
;
nave has two rowsan d more ornat
single bay. The ll ars are la rg er arpanas are separa
ted by a short
ur ce nt ra l pi pa ir ed ar dh ad
The fo where
only at the top and kapota-
with carvings kumbha, kalaéa,
octagonal sectio
n. ts of khura, e mouldings
of th e ga rb hagrha consis tulapitha in th
nd ha ed by with
sakhas, adorned aras
The ve di ba is re pl ac
ha s 4 kh attaka; kalaga wa y wi th fo ur
pali. Each bh
ad ra haped door and prat ih
w. Th e ga rb ha grha has a «p-s d padmalata. River-goddesses ies a Sala in the
belo ambha, an architrave carr
nibandha, st the lalata. The octagonal pillar
s with
patralata, ma s an d a ga nd ha rv a on
gr ha ha s fo ur
jamb ha
appear on the en d. The garb
an d ph am sa kutas at each as several
middle d th e no rth east, as well
ast an and
hich stylistically
.
talapatra brackets sh ri ne s on the southe te mp le , W
iary th e e close
The two subsid els, seem coeval with mp le ) ca n be as signed to th
od te
miniature sh
rine-m graffiti on the
y (t he re are several by
palaeograp hi ca ll
D. Supplementum
h ce nt ur y A. li ff e Bo lo n
of the sevent Carol Radc
8.
REFERENCES Hyderabad 196 bad 1929.
on Ep ig ra phy for 1965, Do mi ni on s 1926-27, Hydera
Rep ort Ni za m’ s
overnmen t nt ©. H. H.
Andhra Pradesh G
rchaeo logi
cal Departme
Re po rt of the A
Annual
——
342
Karnata-Nagara style, Andh
A ra, I.E .1.b.
on
Historical Introducti st y has already been
given in Vol. I
Ra st ra ku ta dy na nce of the
history of the g to the early existe
A full survey of the ev id en ce per tai nin been pro-
opaedia. New ital at Elapura), has
Pt. 2 of this Encycl bl y wi th the ir cap of Danti-
however (proba karaja, grandfather
Rastrakuta dynasty, la te cha rte r of Kar
from an
discovered copper-p may also be surmised
vided by a recently sm in thi s per iod im-
patronage by Buddhi which, among other
durga. The loss of Ak al an ka -c ar it ra ,
a medieval work, the Jaina pontiff Akalan
ka-
event mentioned in to the lif e of the famous Digambara
had ch al le ng ed the
taining J), mentions that he
ist er of Kr sn a t of eso ter ic
ttama, min nti dur ga). A Buddhist
sec
ha sa tu ng a (Da had wo n im pe -
mbly of king Sa a) before Dantidurga
vadis at the asse itself at El ap ur a (El l6r and 13 an d by
disposition ha
i ed by caves nos. 42 i
sty, as can be inferr
rial status for t s converte
ata ra” ’ cave) before it wa
cave no. 15 (th e “Da gav ted late in
Bu dd hi st ca ves were excava
Dantidurga. (The
se urga’s gran
D- du ri ng th e reigns of Dantid
4-
eighth century
their
Architectural Feat
ures a formula for
erred the Dravid follow
th e Ra st ra kut e ea rl y ph as e of the dynasty
While most of th all that
les built during su rv iv in g is sufficiently sm
architecture, f such edifices ures as
f Nagara struct
Karnata-Nagara sty It is even some
what
s no def ini te g nat to th e Ra stra-
it permit Ras tr
g
ped dur ing se Nag ara §
they develo two of the in the Calukya
h certainty that
difficult to say wit few f application of
kata and not Caluky a period. A -. and a difference in th
s agara foundation, the
period, a relative
ts @ Ne m’ e 4
known motifs suppor in front of the Dagavatara cav ntidurga.. re
!
his
rec ept ion -ha ll as t i t ur a ar ea be fo
rock-cut ficence © n in the flap
n, to the muni style was know tions
some reservatio
ca ti on that th e Na ga ra
te mp ther representa ga rbha-
A sm al l in di pictin g La ti na of th e ma in
gi ve n by re li e fs de th e ga kh as e
time, however, is the bottom of 679-680). Th
be Phamsa na temples at cave no. 12 (Plates
of what seem to pe r st or ey © f the Buddhist
of the up
grha doorframe
Genealogical Table:
Rastrakatas of Elapura and
Manyakhétaka
Prechakaraja Indra I
Govindaraja I
Karkaraja
Indrall = Bhavagan
a
(“Lata” Calukya princess?)
a
a rékha and a heavy amalaka. It shelters
Latina temple (Plate 679) shows trikhand figures
a shrines shelter a naga attendant and
figure of a dvarapala. The three Pharnsan relie fs coul d prob ably be
a and Yamu na (Plat es 679-6 80). The date of these
of Gang the Rastra-
prior to actual structural examples of
c. A.D. 700 or about two generations
kita phase.
(Plates 681-685)
Ellora, Dasavatara cave (no. 15), dsthana-mandapa
the so-called Dasavatara
asthana-mandapa in front of
The rectangular, monolithic, is different in style from the
whi ch bear s an inscription of Dantidurga,
cave (Pla te 681) , esses features of the
see ms to bel ong to the Rastrakuta period. It poss
main cave and liarities of its own.
of the Kar nat a-Nagara style, plus some pecu
eastern Cal uky a sch ool t details. Its pitha
ut str uct ure sim ulates a constructed form in mos
This roc k-c a temple, Alampur
for m of jag ati met on the Kumara-Brahm
(Plate 684) fol low s the h of which follow
aga nat ha tem ple , Pattadakal (c. a.D. 725), bot
(c. A.D. 625), and the Gal , the kati is
gi. The hal l is lai d out on a straight manasutra
the Nagara style of Ven h the central
ns by pla in Ruc aka pilasters (Plate 681), wit
divided into three sec tio makara-torana
rec tan gul ar, jal ava tay ana, with a beautiful
section showing a large, from known
683 ), dif fer ing in details but derived
l (Pl ate a are a
above on the south wal
th is an unf ini she d may ura-torana; below the jal
the nor ions
Calukya examples. (On and ratikrida scenes.)
The flanking wall-sect
g mithunas ediment (touching the
soffit
series of panels showin he with tall lambana-p
, a tall cen tra l nic nic hes har bour
have three niches sma ller niches (Plate 681).
The tall
fla nke d by two er res tin g on the kati
of the bharapatta) rai sed in abhayamudra, the oth
ure s, one arm the se we re
two-armed male fig flo wer , or some such object.
(Some of
in
(Pl ate 685 ), is sho wn
or carrying a flask s Lok apa las , and in one case the
figure
r
s, per hap The sma lle
intended to be divinitie on his left suggestive
of Ardhanari.}
female breast etc. Most
samabhanga, with a
fem ale att end ing fig ures, apsarases, mithunas, mewhat
niches bear both male
and their lower sections, so
o sh ow att endant female figures on Mallikarjuna
wall-pila ste rs als
the gi dh am an da pa s of the Virapaksa and amorous
inside toning pilasters show
like the feature found eas t and sou th, can
(On the
temples at Pattadakal. es
Above the
ithunas. the mou ldi ngs bene ath are unfinished.
oe vat Hae kapotapa
lika, and seated lion figures at the
of in th e fo rm of a low Platform with side. The
kapotapalika is a
pl ai n ro between on each nt
ed nidhi figures (gananayakas?) as are ab se .
senate and three seat ts a roof suggesting a clerestory. Dandik
ppor moonstone, leads
centre of the hall su way, with sejant elephan ts on the sides and a
A hastihasta-s tair the sakhas have
orway (Plate 681);cent
ug h a ca tu hg ak ha do re ones with
east thro e end and
to the interior on the nga shows fiv e pa ne ls , th
Three
e uttara g ones having sala-sikh
aras.
no decoration. Th e two intervenin
me nt s an d th
a couple of ero tic scenes
Phamsana pedi e cen tra l one Lakuliéa?) and
fig ure s (th rwa y is fla nked on
seated Buddha-like the panels. The doo
amo ng the worn-out figures in
can be discerned Yamuna.
‘mages of Ganga and perfectly plain,
four ih Ruc aka pill ars in the centre. Tho. ugh .
eo caer has Wi
cha ste and handsome. pair of lions left
the interior loo ks
(Pla te 682 ) has a pro jecting catuski with a
The porch on the west there is no entrance, but
step s. The pillars are plain, and urga
i ption of Dantid
flan ks of the
uncarved at the
ed jala . The lintel aboy ve bears the well-know seern inscri
rather a restor Kirttivarma Il.
over his Calukya overlord,
that mentions his victory
346
Pattadakal, Kasivisvés
vara temple (
This temple (
heartland; it seems from other Nagara temple . a
to combine forms, feat ures, and de s in ae cml
corative ideas from ae
ories as well as elemen evaren
ts an
d details peculiar eee
ue to its being founded aft
er Rastrakata occup
temples (Galaganat S as is
ha, Papanatha, Jamb evident by a comparison on
;
agara
dakal). ulinga, Kadasiddhé pees
évara) in .
The Kasvisvégvar
(now missing),
a te mple consiste
and a N
otha above,
at the base of
ee
ier €ae the Sikhara,
ill,
illus silhouette of these shows védika 87,
illareq Mandapa
small pillarets pattern Cheat
(Plate 687).isA echoed behind,
© Sikhara thin
i kapdta and Sad by
é iin js Paficabhima 0 abov epee
’ more advanc j
atl 1 .iThat ed i
in
UU Jala (Pa, latePa form and de
s rticularly in its hej taili than
;
ap e,
tter somew and the intricate in pe i
© madhyalata at re mi te rl ac in g s
of that Bo e a
nds one
775, Above of
the gj ar the Harihara temple eck
Ti *Mpur and a is a skan no. 2 a
wale dh a- vadi ch
Kapili Walls ins of the Galaga aracterist! ic of
f llow kalaga are Missing natha temp
mandabaa e d le at Pattadakal the
gin ( he Prasada ;
Plate 688) walls, wit
has a 800
d pro ile, h a niche applied
ing bal OWe with lam on the kat
es: r P bana (tal }
art an“4. d onton is l h e p
a b o t a
ouring Na ndsome Shti"rnausésual and arrest
tégq with in
es abogv: (an
andapa naka com
has its l Um
ong & side a. e
laid along the north-south
axi is
RA a sae 347
ASTRAKUTAS OF ELAPURA AND MANYAKHETAKA
asttra, it shows
res emb les the pra sada; laid on a straight man
(Fig. 138). In elevat io n, it flanking the
th, two on the west, and two larger ones
five niches on the nor th and sou flanked by
central gala-sikhara
t (Pl ate s 686 , 688). These two have a vimana
doorway on the eas 688). The grasapattt of the
ted by paired pillars (Plate carrying an endless mala. Above the
yadharas
wall is replaced on the man l platform above the nave.
The
sta rts a slo ing roof ; with a raised centra
pin ra’ ?) an d Ar dh a-
kapotapalika ee n niches — Bhiksatana
(Gangadha
eas t
o fig ure s be tw om the eas t. Th e
north wall has tw n the se co nd and the third niches fr
a be tw ee rig ht.
nari — and a small jal of a damaged Trivikra
ma image on the
the re mn an t ) has a thin
wall pr es er ve s
of the gu dh am andapa (Plates 688, 692
The paricasakha doo rfr ame asakha with
ved rat nas akh a, vallisakha, rounded mal
crispl y car of pearls).
nagasakha, elegant and akh a of pa dm a var iet y (with an inner border
y a pahirs uda, on the lalata, is
valli design, and finall the river-goddesses. Gar
thuna and one of
At the pédya are a mi
having a
damaged. dhamandapa are Misra (Plate 699)
The four central pillars of the gi columns at Maha-
ft (re miniscent of Mangalééa’s
kumbhika that suppor ts a flu ted sha above the kumbhika
me pil lar s at Al am pur). A small female s narrative
kita and Aihole and te 699). The cu be above the 12-fluted section carrie
so
(P la by a neck-
faces the interior ra na s (P la te s 69 8-699). This is followed
scenes from Saiva and Va
is na va Pu hata or amalaka
th 16 - an d 32 -s id ed fluting. The purnag
ing in two narrow st
rata wi e of the brackets are
tar ang a-p oti ka fro m whi ch a vyala leaps (on the sid
above supports
elephant-busts): tas at the bottom
s on the northe rn wall show pirnagha ich
The engaged column ow s a ve rt ic al ba nd fo ll owed by a horizontal belt wh
- the shaft sh rmal affinity to that
(Plates 693-694); lpavalli pattern that has a fo
shows a ka
in one instance (Plate 693),
348
Karnata-Nagara style, I1E.2.
349
AKHETAKA
RASTRAKUTAS OF ELAPURA AND MANY ;
known in earl
frat es at Réda.
on the doorfram da. In other cases , thi this rather echoes a pattern s :
The undifferentiated lasuna above show
canes buildings at Aihole (Plate 694). ment ed by a
taranga-potika (Plate 693) is orna
inely formed nasi on each face. The
beautiful medial ratna band. simple. The most
orna ment atio n of the corn er pilasters is somewhat more above the
The
featu re is the pres ence of a vyala trampling an elephant
notable new
kumbhika (Plate 696).
the
ere catem ; with blocked-out belts meant for
The superstruc ture of thelain Ru betrays the same
The mukhacatus
i ed $a khas. The shrine
orframe has U
na do rn the same period.
carving. The trisakha
e doe
a te mp le , and was built in
ge Kasivisvesvar
finesse as does the lar M.A. Dhaky
York
New York University, New
REFERENCES
ul pt ur e, ” Ph.D. dissertation,
ya Sc
“Barly Chaluk 1880.
Carol Radcliffe Bolon, ,
of Indi a, London
, The Cave Temples (Arc haeological Survey of Indi
a,
1981.
James Fer
and gus son
of the Kana rese Districts
James Burgess e Ch alukyan Architecture
Henry Cou sen s, Th .
Calcutta 1926
Series, 42),
New Imperial
350
BANDIPUR
ie
WANGATH
ay
cme. : JHarwan)
URI Bandi Parihasapur®
arihasapur ' ;
© Sankaracarya
SRINAGAR, x Resastane
‘@ Pandréthan
@
arg
Kakpur/”
\a
e
K
ashmirr
: aKarkota ana Ut
pala sites,
ILF.
CHAPTER 223
le: S
Varieties of North Indian sty ae oe
Bt
the Panjab, c. A.D. 500-1100
s a n d Ut pa la s of K a s m i r a
Karkota
Historical Introduction
Kashmir (Kasmira)
es qu e and fe rtile valley of phic-
ntains, th e pi ct ur
co ns id er ab le an tiquity. Its geogra
ty from Iranian,
culture, and poli many races and cultures including
ound of
de it a meeting gr
al position has ma epigraphical, num-
Central ed from literary,
Tibetan, Chinese, and references in
The early history mented by stray
al sou is the Rajataran-
ismatic, and monumentin source for the history © a, a court poet and
histo-
Chinese annals. Th
e ma by Kalhan
ns kr it wr it te n in a.D. 1148-1150 y of Kashmir
gin, a work in Sais generally reliable for the histor myths
rian. This work rl ie r pe ri od s, it was based psmaesinly© on
tworthy for ea \ luable glim
onwards but is untrus lier epochs, Srinagar! (Pandrée than or Pura-
of of
th e re fe re nc es to AsO
r
(si c), an d Ju sk a (sic), d to a host .)
an
episodes, as in
e Ku sana ki Kaniska, Huska avaraséna II (c. sixth century A.D
an a) , to th na. Pr
nadhisth in g Mi hi ra ku la and Torama ar
alled Prava-
ie fs in cl ud de d Sr in ag
Huna ch ng foun
example, as havi e in-
is metioned, for a. li ab le an d comprehensiv
apur re Kalhana’s
rasénapura or Pravar
of
ra ng in ! ha s ou s, an d ec on omic matters of ministers,
The Raja ta religi f rulers and
cal, a i
formation on politi e n (including even
th
ded aristocracy),
dw el ls on
own period. It s an d in cidents
tr ig ue of taxation,
narrates court in rds and measures
gua tion of
the roles played by palaceefactions, P er ha ps with the founda
ben tory
and details religious into sober his century.
ve s from ™ ly in the seventh also
extortions, etc . It mo
Du rl ab ha va rd ha na ear
e pil gri m, Hstan Tsang,
nasty by at Ch in es and
the Karkota dy na ’s ru le , to 633 , “st udy ing the sutras
rdha ‘ 1 shmir
During‘ Durlab hava th re e ye ar s pe op le , |re cording that Ka
ng d
visited Kashmir, spe? di t of th e country an oka n stupas contai
ning
He lef t a de tai led accoun br et hr en , and four As
éastra s.” 5,00 0
mona steries, Urasa (Hazara)
,
had 100 Buddhist y o n d Kashmir to Du r-
b e a.
relics of the Buddha
. extended , and Taksasil
s territories Pa rn otsa (Poonch) t king 0
Durlabha va rd ha na ’
Ra ja pull (Raj au ri ),
na Is an d was th e firs
); inese an edited
tya I, who is er
t Ran ge
Simhapura (the Sal o mentio‘one ne d in the Ch m, pr at ap a di
labhavardhana
is als
was suc ceed
ed by his so
ue coi ns. He
Kashmir to iss
352
Kashmir and Panjab style, II-F.
I. Karkota dynasty
1. Durlabhavardhana
2. Durlabhaka Pratapaditya
3. Vajraditya-
4. Udayaditya-
Candrapida 5. Lalitaditya-
Tarapida
(c. a.p. 711-719) Muktapida
(A.D. 719-729)
(A.D. 724-761)
6. Kuvalayapida
7. Vajraditya Bappiyaka
Tribhuvanapida
8. Prthivyapida
9. Sangramapida 10. Vanayaditya-
Jayapida
(a.p. 751-778)
14, Ajitap;
pePida
11. Lalitapida 12. Sanid gramapSeid P|
16. Utpalapida
13. Cippata-Jayapida 15. Anangapida
353
KOTAS AND UTPALAS OF KASMIRA
KARKO
Sukhavarma
Siravarma
1. Avantivarma
(A.D. 855-883)
Sukhavarma
= 5. Sugandha
2. Sankaravarma (a.p. 904-906)
(a.p. 883-902)
gu
7, Nirjitavarma Pan
4, Sankata
3. Gopalavarma (a.p. 921-923)
(a.p. 904)
» (a.p. 902-904)
9, Saravarmal
8 & 11. Cakravarma (A.D. 933-934)
6 & 10. Partha (A.D. 923-933;
(A.D. 906-921; 936-937)
934-935)
ti
NP. Unmattavan
(A. D. 93 7- 93 9)
13. Saravarma Il
(A.D. 939)
dynasty
IV. Parvagupt@
dynasty
III. Yagaskara
Abhinava
Prabhakaradéva
sangramaguPta
-949)
1. YaSaskara (A.D. 948 (A.D. 949-950)
ils parvagupta
D. 949-950)
2. Sangramadéva (A.
Didda 03)
upt@ =
2. Ksemag 958) (4 980/1-10
(AD 0-
. 95
2)
an yu (AD: 958-97
3. Abhim
upta
vana 6. Bhimag
980/1)
5. Tribhu 97 ) (A.D. 975-
@ 973-
4 Nandigupt {a.D-
2-973
(ap. 97
354
: Kashmir and Panjab style, II.F.
; : i
8 and other int
ernal enemies, and:
O great templeseral Patron of arts
to
authors such
as Bhatta Kallata, of ee it and letters, he founded Avantip jpura
na adorned his court, raehied en ora)
ts an
; Na, Sivasya and ppantisvara
mi, Rat there.
nakara, and Ananda
Poe
vardha-
in the history of
.
5
Kashmir Particul
fabio «9a, who, by arly because e
ili Co of
r irrigation i log amount o nt ro ll in g th e waters of the. Vita ie
“on Visited freq Cultivatable land ee
ods and fate — and by ye
qWered DaryVva Was sy
;
rops to a land that
had until t
ae ee oe
Y his son Sankarav
‘on falling betweenarth ma (c. a.p. 883- L
e Vitasta and 90
Ch2)andr
whab
o haco n:
g?@
355
KOTAS AND UTPALAS OF KASMIRA
KARKO'
ae the adj
ofuge
oin
S
ing
h e )
hil ly tra ct t Blast Alan
the Sahi pt
ous Pra tih ara kin g of Kanauj), and Lalliya er t pe mer er se
e fam s
tio ns dra ine d San kar avarma’s ane aa ei e e Nata a
a expedi ly ie
s fel l hea vil y on tem ple endowments, priest San kar apu-
ar extortion He founde d
wer e fur the r opp res sed by forced labour. To wa rd s the
ivators, who d it by three large Saiva
temples.
eve r, and ad or ne Sind hu (In dus )
rapattana (Patan), how car rie d his arm s westward towards the la,
arav ar ma Viranaka, below Bar amu
end of his reign, Sank nti er officer (dvaradhipa) at
dea th of his fro
to avenge the k.
d during his march bac ed at the
and was fatally wounde by ten de sp ot s wi thin 34 ye ars, who rul
kravarma
followed Praetorian guards). Ca
Sankaravarma was mb le d the Ro ma n s, who
(who re se the aid of the Damara
mercy of the Tantrins ns in A.D . 93 6 wi th
s in ne
of the Tantri d rapine; all prince
destroyed the power ns in bl ac km ai l an
known for
rpassed the Tantri (A.D. 939-948) was
however, soon su Only the rei gn of Ya sa sk ar a
was a
its stability and justice. rul er Kse mag upt a (A.D. 950-958),
nd depraved the political scene
ability, who dominated , and finally as
licentious and colour sort, then regent
cen tur y, fi rs t as queen-con d under a succes
sion of
in Kash mi r for hal f a country st oa ne
death in a.p. 1003, ththe 101), who, while
sovereign. After her g in e ru le of Harsa [A.D. 1089-1 soldier and
lings, culminatin uits and music, was wor thless as a
characterless weak y pu rs d me ing down
lt
ow in g ta le nt for both scholarl r ro bb in g te mp le -t reasures an
sh fo
gain ed notoriety
administrator. He der to replenish his exchequer. the first Lohara dynasty. Two
in or d ©f
ancient images
n 0 f Ha rs a marked the en ssala (A.D. 4111-1126), ruled co5)n-,
The assassinat
io d Su (A.D. 4128-115
Uc ca la (A .D . 4101-1111) an n,
rsa, er’s so
nephews of Ha met violent deaths. The latt success ful king who ruled through a
ly bu t mine lynt
secutive and proved ane
a
lhana, author
d to th e th ro ne g. He was the pa tron of Karuled for about
succeede an d cu nn in to be
ation of strength mir continued
judicious combin Ja ya si mh a’ s death, Kash
un ti l a.p . 13 37 when Hindu rule
ng in i. Af te r
k Hind u pr in ce s
of the Rajatara i
two centuries b y a succes S hip, as attested by
by Su lt an y A.D. The oldest
was terminated da st ro n 3) and
Kashmir has h ad a
a work from
devote
mir valley was
cult in the Kash esent lakes
Aégoka’s mi
ga , An an ta na ga, etc.). When
na
sm i
preach Buddhi
ch ed Naga cu
well entren port that Kani s engrav
dd hist itaka treatise sm con-
able success. Bu
had the Trip dii ng to the aij “sini,4 Buddhi
d at the e nd w h o stayed
in Kashmir an i tian Tsang,
iipa in
deposited in a st ed by the s
on is
tinued to be patr
tw years (A.D.
o 2
in Kashmir for Ou-kong,
ra s.
W!
vi site:d
0 vi ha state. ong
and about 10 in 4 flourishing Hs ui! an Ts anngg and Ou-k te nd e
Buddhi sm e bo th they ex
also found ng ma ni ca l religion but of the
ki ah
The Karkota se
f the Br
de ve lo pe d as a strong
hold
re th em fa ct ,
Kashmir, we Buddhism. Ka
sh
tr on ag e to
liberal pa
356
Kashmir and Panjab style, IF.
traordinari y
Architectural
Features
f Kashmir derive
d its basic hypo
$ pent-roof form style plan from hist
and many of it the Budd
» an d pilaster-foy s or n
India itself, Th
e Kashmir arch
itect, ho
Prominent en
trance
gateway matc
h
columns in fr the Central shrine in scal
ont of
have four. The walls articulate recessed bhadras using two ae ilaster ers, aeelarger
outer pair on the face of the wall and a smaller inner pair that flan Mees ec
eaiment
inner pilasters support a pedimented trefoil arch; the eas ae
Seaaabiainto
forming the principal ornamental design of the jangha an a
a ioilasters that sup-
the superstructure. The karnas of the temple are marked by
bro pee 7 heeenplos
port the entablature and a two-storeyed pyramidal roof, the latte
r ie
but fully intact at Pandréthan and Payar. These shrines also pee ee
eee arcseting
ceilings: at Pandréthan a “lantern” roof made of a cont
racting se
squares, at Payar a domical ceiling carved from a singl
;
e slab. In larger temp les such as
the Jyésthésa and Bhiutééa at Narannag,
a domical ceiling pepe‘ a hmaerentric aa
circles of kanjur held together by adhesive lime
ah At apap the
shows the corbelled inner face of the outer
pyramidal roof. laced in an
These temples stand on a jagati of one or two
tiers; the larger Bai oeae Bi impoE:
open rectangular court surrounded by a
cellular enclosure generally Bete fits maint
ing colonnade. Each cell of the enclosure suggests a miniature
shrine, employing the same ornamental Mes F
design of a pedimented tre fe) 7 that
Some of the very large temples like Martanda, at Tapar
the Senne an Be ee GE ANE
are conceived as paficayatana and
have subsidiary shrines in the four
courtyard.
The jagati and védibandha both use the same set of .
prising kalaéa (resting bold, plain moulding
in s com-
on a pair of upana-like da
crowning kalaga with a projecting pattikas), broad kandhara,
madhyabandha. an
The architectural style
of Kashmi
plan from the B uddhis
t monastery,
Gandhara, and base mo
uldings and
3 e
, and Payar,
mo
tvative, however, numents at Avantipur and Patan.
with
wie at
that only limited ey even
Ties. ch ange is perceptibl
e,
ec ofHead
ness pl bie ure of Kashmir depends iOus~
; Plates 704-707)
359
| ‘ ;
20
10
F. 0
aracarya temple, plan.
Fig. 139. Srinagar. Sank
The
Srinagar.
ra wling city of
look s th e sp gh octagon@
nt Go pa dr i), that over hl ar s an d stands on a hi
ll (anc ie e as niches with
Sulaiman hi d of limeston ally b y sunk
s" . i d in te rn three steep
temple fa ce s ea
2 pa ra pe t and deco ra te
ks in
in a an is reached by above the
terrace protec
ted by ons as P rada ‘ng; and
70 6) . Th e terrace functi lowest s i loses the
tops (P la te ’ ve th e
eps throug
flights of st 2D ar ch ed entrance
es is i
middle seri gonal tert
ep s d ab ove an octa
ig ht of st Co n planes of
top fl
ta of fs et s at the base. al ly with two
plain bh it t is $4
sanctum bu
a circular
—
—‘
—+n
PO0a) 1s 12 a
16 20
le
i
rn
i
se
sis
na
a
361
IRA
KARKOTAS AND UTPALAS OF KASM
plan.
lan; ©. Siva temple no. 1,
Fig. 140.
b. Siva temple no. 2,p
362
Kashmir and Panjab style, ILF.
eee a» e
| EEE
7-St —e Ls)
(ae S e es
~a
@6
—<—<——————
@ Ss
ga nts of
tt ak a the largest monume
.
in g
.
lai g an d si ng on e of
in
u
da nc ar s, is LalitaA -
liefs of imestone ashl mic personalit yoof
y
vr
Hee aa
i
ec ts th e dy na
dly refl t king of Kashmir.
This: temple. ception undoubte ou s and powerful
ty of plan as seen in
the mo st am bi ti
an d iio ae by far and im maturi
r. Ils gr si ta nc y nd jagati. In
Kashmi
we ve r
rs a he
d a p a an d th e ad dition of a seco
t, ho
wings of the ma n
fee al
e Ul
366
Kashmir and Panjab style, ILF.
show Pilasters
in
725-726), The ith ganas seemin
nked by plain rails; the side walls
site g to support th
images of Buddha (
of fr e weight (Plate
and of Bodhis agments of trefoil ar s
attyas ches containing
(not illustra
ted)
gall
! on the east
36
KARKO' TAS AND P.
UTPALAS O F KASMI RA
we ll-preserv ed
Siva temple
h as a
Narastan, Siva te
m
a st of Av ant
ipur,
d structure lo
cated in the
s n o r t h e h a m b e r e
si 20 mile i »ale- c
d wall
em
Narastan, le in many ah T:he t 65 vex di
remaa
:
rkab
tyard (70
t. squqdare a ial saaved
middle of a cour stands on 4 jase gati does nO
o.
Th e te mp le Sur
peristyle). 2 de ep trefoiled recess sually shallow trefoil
ha s 4
pe hadra d by an unu s spring
eee ane an wh ic h the pedimentanda and
ga on le pl an W it al s fr om
pediment da as at Ma rt
pitched doub o- st or ey ®
a tw e ape
crowned by nn aras; and th side walls
are ador ne d by ki
th e co ur t by a stair with iva
ched from rland. A praggt
d by swag s taining an
in ne r
di e he
is‘c s on its gures © f atlantid
trefol
decorated with ._ wit‘ with two eed :i hes beneath harbour fi
projects ab
out 4 ft Smaller d niche
a s i x - a r m e d
a d o u b l e -pedimente
image of st wall is
4 éj va li ng a; oO the ea
shrines
e sanctum en
a,Th
368
Kashmir and Panjab style, II
Tapar, Visnu te
mple (Fi 8S. 142,
143f, 147b, 153c; Pla
Ancient Pratap tes 731-733, 739)
apura has the
Kashmir (measu Te mains of on
ring about 300
fla remains sh ft. from east t
temple
sheds the
© Central ashmiri temp] ee
edificg Ce € an Consolid
i
; as i
is ates the layo
ae
Chiamber ut and a
eg stru
cture of
dvi-anga
pee wa
tag oP
©
ae Sra 369
KARKOTAS AND UTPALAS OF KASMIRA
Y
ees
—<—
| ;
=
on) |
|
| =a oe)|
ie
A par. Visnu te
mple, plan.
. 142 »
Figig. Ta
370
ie‘al
Pie
SS 8
a
Reed)
a
4M
F {0
Fig. 143,
Védibandha F.
s.
a. Srinagar
° Mattan. ankaracary
a
Mart atempl temple; p, Laduy. ,
Martanda, e, Southwes Siva templ no. 1;
f. Tap horthwe t co rn er , e
‘$nu temple m er, shrine shrine;
, Southwes ; ¢. Calta:
t Corner, Parihasapura.
shrine,
KARKOT UTPALAS OF KASMIRA 371
TAS AND
ith ani
Ows a large ornate niche, carved sjeaet
aka with attendants, aac
oil. The pilasters that =
is ‘abellished like those of the vanes ee
it Sele
y human-headed pene a
(the right pilaster
of the we
SNmir), ;
sign unknown
from any other on
m u-
375
KARKOTAS AND UTPALAS OF KASMIRA s
ple, plan.
Fig. 146. Pat an. Sankaragaurisa tem
survives in Patan
with four doors,
A miniature shr
in an old steppe
of only three stone lower
the shrine was made ing (Plate 758). The
mi
the cap of the pyra trefoil base of
ti an d shrine up to the
es the jaga rises the upper
po
upper stone comp
projections, the |
the superstructure. a-C, 155a-b;
phamsana le vel of (Fi gs. 148-149, 153g, 154
-g ro up s
ésa temple
Narannag , Jyésthé éa and Bhut
ra tirtha),
Plates 763-766) s spring (ancient Soda
kn ow n af te r the homonymou ng ath. Bounded
by high
of Na ra nn ag , s fr o m Wa een pine
The hamlet ad i hill-torren tc.
2.5 mi le
cl ot hed by deep gr
e K an ka -n ak s an d made of
is a site on th ra ng e (ca pped by sn ow
pe
mo nu me n ts, All are
va ra e
hills of the Bhutes
th re
tting for its
offers a pictures que se
forests), the site
376
©. Avantipur. ankuna’s st
Avantisvamj iipa; b, Tapar. Visnu te
temple; d. mple;
Patan, Sugandhééa
temple.
377
KARKOTAS AND UTPALAS OF KASMIRA
an.
tésa group, pl
Fig. 149. Narannag. Bhii
380
The adhisthana
Main shrine. of the peristyle
The Colonnad (Plate 768) shows the same ‘
Capital above e uses f]uted mouldings as oe ae
th © usual amalak columns with a mou
Seems more a- like member (Fig. lde d bas e and a vo
ster eotyped
than that at th 158b). The volute
Occurrence
can be no e Sy gandhé d capita
ital l here
ted, sa temple at Pa a
Only vestiges tan, where its fimat
of the Garud firs
1
ted to Siva, Like northwest
Buniar this templequadrant of the courtyard. he
is assignable
to c. early in
Ce
th, Siva temple
ae ae of Fa (Figs, 151-152 ; Plat
thgadh, ¢. Seve es 77
rine n miles from B 2-774)
aramula has
nga. This a Siva temple
ig the larg ; that once
est Surviv
ing templ
: 9 in. externa e in Kashmir, i
at lly (Plate 774
et SOMponen uch above ). oe
Moderntk Vill t s of the templ the jagati
e ageioe ee aoe e e, inclu and. i le
about e modern hab ding its g
@ the level itation, The gr ht
of the shri ound level
lide i ne floor. of
oFwith i ee Pilaster, ed temples, : asada
a eee and those fl th is isa o
measures 16 fy A d h yabandha an ki ng th
e on
e bhadras
Dial Moulding,
ea
show ;
neath). The b r
hadra receass by ee aa,
“ep. It shows
h @ prominent alcove, (Plate
ith a
with
381
KARKOTATAS AND UTPALAS OF KASMIRA
pe"
<i
plan. (After Kak.)
r. Visnu temple,
Fig, 150. Bunia
382
Kashmir and Panjab style, IF.
| i
fo)
|
if
is)
és
G)
hanas: r face: antipur.
yle adhist nde, oute ce; @& Av
Fig. 15 3. Perist » 1b Marta i i
am
a, Martanda,
inner face;
Avantisvara,
ner ace;
Bhutéga, in
Fig. 154, Védibandha
s;
a. Naranna
no. 4; sh
pur, Avanti rine no. 23 by shrine no.3; c.
Avanti
svami temple shrine
;_ 1. Patan, Mi , SEs hrine; e.
éthamandir, ni ature Siva shrine; Ava nti pur .
NW shrine. g, Bandi.
» but
aving more have a much taller capital, n
urmounte
d moulded ornaments
by a Splayed-out i aier
a architrave fhanvde embel-
asamukhas and
mented trefoil,alternating with recessed
Peau
eatin
The broad
the *rowning Rucaka pilasters
oil, forming mi of the
ornament
of the
eleva-
385
KARKO TAS AND UTPALAS OF KASMIRA
: alinga
al Siv
eri or of the gar
ssbha grh aa was flagged and enshrii ned a coloss r
Theon/intater
olacad ae
ey 0 Ab e o a preserved to a height of ove
is e ing
TF fate Lae An in the four corners (Plate
774). The actual ceil
eee eee
feat
ead ed ima ge of sta ndi n Si , having unique iconographic t ofAee
g Siva
A four-h . The fierce back head
es tted tha
excavated near this tem
ple nt and back heads
pa the two fig ure s in the crest of the fro t
re fisnu. Also unus ua l are the eighth century bu
is att rib uta ble to a date not later than in th e te nt h
5 e image stylisticall
y attributable to early
to be lo ng to the temple, which seems
oes not se em
its huge size
century.
ug e as hl ar s an d in deed is remarkable for rcular top
of h mici
The monument is built the sanctum. The b hadra niche with its se anticipates
ui nc he s in l ab ov e
and the unusual sq Gupta-period “keyhole” nic hes, but the yar, of a slightly later
tre foi
to Pa
aes a throwback the Siva temples at
Pandréthan and
co mp on en t of
e central
date.
(not illustrated) d uplands, is si
tuated c. 20
Manasbal, Siva temple by hi ll s an s sub-
nded jor P art remain
lake of Ma nasbal, surrou wh os e ma
The picturesque Here stands a smalllI]
shri ne quare internally;
miles north of Srinagar.the year. The shrine is single- nt divided into
two
of
merged during most by a tre
its doorway is surmounted of the pedi
sections. The upper portion
arch is flanked by
a garland; the trefoil ; store
of Lakuliga. The pyramidal The recess below the lower of the tenth century A.D.
amalaka. quarter
crowned by an to the first
The temple is assignable
metopes. es 775-778)
le (Fis: 155e; Plat on the upland real the
between
Si va te mp al ”) , mits of
Pandréthan, men oldies itlies within the present
li
2 a u na pn ay : ing
+)
e ie E a éoka: ac rd
co
uran anic n f o u n aras aen
ebanwa hill
as
of th e Z i n j , Srinagar! w as a d o r ned by Prav mple ©
slopes j i @ Saiva te
s, including mothers).
y A.D. “
(c. mid-sixth centur
a Matrcakra (a
cir a of Meruvar hana-
ra an d ‘pe ahg hni
e oat)Dayaram Sa y
Pravareg va
an ci en t te mp le now standl v e be a
The only ift w unifor ml
erroneously i ar : as Saiva, no
that Cunningham jagati to the
co ns tr uc te d by Meruvard
h
in ea iD . «ntact from thehave come to
svam i ate pi No traces
holar to demonstr ynatural springs:
was the first sc e of the best pre4pit ea b
on ; has usual
accepted. It is er ged in 4 tan the jagat
ja ga ti is su bm w a r d g; and
gikhara. Its ati
e a g dhara,
omp r i s
as an c
Jain bhitt sa gati prov
!
y e 0” the nor
th,
) e t rs yd “
o o ra w an
mouldings whic i o jbas e mna
s a c
e c o e modateThie y, providing ‘
great
a p r o
W j e tion
ce mo re pr omp inr ene tls
na.a Bhad r e “e ec e t a
rradae
oroppr ksim oD the lateraltheaha oc, e itne
ff
similar do or wa ys
K a s h mir, s h o r t , n ovel, upap
p! Ka e &
previous tem es in ‘sing abov
and shade, W!
contrast of light late 7 75) lack a
The temple (P
386 yi :
Kashmir an: d Panjab sty. le, LF.
Fig. 155.
Jagatis an
d vady
a. aranna
arann:
387
KARKOOTAS AND UTPALAS OF KASMIRA
388 jab, ILF.
Varieties of North Indian style: Styles of Kashmiri and the Panjab,
8 Test on er Beha :
y harhsas wi:th flo iate
bold ghata bases, the riate
tails (their‘7 82gha
:
ta-
ir Capitals on ‘la ste rs Wi
ee sow cantoning
easing patravalli. Rucaka pilas
389
KOTAS AND UTPALAS OF KASMIRA
KARKO
.
Siva shrine
Miniature
b, Patan.
390 : jab, IL-F.
Varieties of North Indian style: Styles of Kashmir and the Panja
(fel
6) ge) eS
Sauepat
w—iil
Fig, 158, Peristyl
e columns:
a. Martanda; . Buniar. Visn
u temple.
391
KOTAS AND UTPALAS OF KASMIRA \
KARKO
t (oFww
atas (or
pil-stes of Am a
rae.
ury aD. U
c. tenth cent niyar 12 Swat.
at Gu 1 at
is located il lu st ra te d) bl es th e temple no.
(not em
wat), temple
Guniyar (S
This m a ake ‘ches and
a win
it s $ ae ; type
Laduv in rtially pres r at Guniyar shows
fo u l as a proto
ni ya r pa i y a r ™ onument
size and Gu ‘terio
have seen
the Gun
b a r s Laduv, s c h o l a r s
hared ome
o n e a l
392 jab, ILF.
Varieties of North Indian style: Styles of Kashmiri and the Panjab,
ndrethan
t on the jan gha of the Siva temple at Pa
not unlike tha dyadharas
pedimented trefoil, A.D . Th e ske tch sh ows a pair of flying vi at
d-tenth century the door to the shrine
ened: to the mi the arc hit rav e of
e inner trefoil as on The shrines at Kéetas
Nene above th coe val wi th the Pandrethan temple.
most
anasbal, which is al th e lat ter half of the tenth
century.
earlier ruined
da te d in larger and probably
may therefore be gr ou p st an ds a
ted pilasters of
of the Satghara nels framed by stun
About 170 ft. east wi th a ro w of pa Gandhara.
nt embellished ddhi of stupas in count of
temple, its baseme at fo un d on th e me
s ac
what resembling th stupa mentioned 1in Hstan Tsang’
a deuessign some
en t the Buddhist
ItA is likely to repres
Simhapura. Krishna Deva
, XXVI
REFERENCES Society of Bengal
Jou rna l of the Asiatic
in Potowal,”
eek Sculpture ddhist Monume
nts,
“Remains of Cr rv ey , Hindu and Bu
i ca l Su
, Archaeolog
peti ntendent
eport of the Su he 154-161.
4920-1921.
Northern Circle, mzai, of Kashmir, De
lhi 1962.
ri od s) , 4t h ed it io n, Bombay 1959,
Pe
Kaul Ba dhist and Hindu Kashmir, Lonon Aa6y:
Prithvi Nath
dianArchitecture (Bud s in Societ y of Bengal
, XXXV
Percy Brown, In , Illustrations of Ancient Buildi
ng f the Asiatic
Ha rd y Co le s » Journal o
Henry of the Temple XIV, 33-35.
otes on Some ; V, 86-92; mir,”
W.G. Cowie, “N In d Oe Ex92hibited in th e Temples of Kash
88 -1
i l Surv ey of re ,
eologica Architectu
ham, Arc ha say 00 the Arian Order of ee
A. Cunning An Es j a
y of ee rs, ail
gham, “ 3. a, es a
A. Cunnin l of the Asiatic Societ au andhara,
Pat
e In di an Himalay 4
ur na i q u e t h Art an
Jo
Ar t gr ec o- ouddnhd Art of ashmir an ty a- Mu kt ap! a,”
ucher, L’ History a litadi
Alfred Fo udies in the e Art of La eres
H. Goetz, St of M a r t and and th . t ,
Temple | Singh
et z, “The Sun sh m' r, London 19°. ns of th e Sri Pratap
H. Go ents of Ka tic Sect io
11. ‘ent Monum d Numisma
(1953), 1- ologica! an 5 seid
Ar ch ae ;
R b O B E of th 2 3 . 69 ; 12
f i a 1 9 i 19
istan, Karach
l
er ae ; Calcutta and Sim of
Ram Sae Srinaga! sures in ak ical Survey
Museum, and Art Trea ” Archaeolog
Architecture er ie s at Jaulian,
F.A. Khan, stupas and
Mo na st
at Taxila:: The f
arshall, Oe
“Ex
eae emoirs, No. 7, Calc bridge _ ¥ me
utta 1 21. ne
d 1935.
India, M vo ls ., C am f Ka sh mi r, Allahaba Ba
, 3 gs ;
n Ma rs ha ll, Taxila c e S a of th i 1 9 7 0. rt , 1913-2*
Jo h h nginil,n w De lh
Annual Re
po
a a
aj e of Ka sh mi r, & In di a,
ram Fr i
on d C Itur ologic@ ] Surv
ey
al
a Sie
ejit
Ran tae tHis: toreyne an sept i Archae dia, A nnu
Ch an dr a P o,
Ray n Ear
d T
ly
ic al Su rvey of In
Sunil “pxcavations
at
ir,” Archae
olog :
Sahni, 1900.
Daya Ram i
Westminste
r
Monu of Ka shmir, 2 vols.,
40-62.
hni, wp re-Muhammadan ‘cle of th Ki ng s
Daya Ram Sa 8. i, aC ronic di Be
London 1
Report, 19 15-16, 49 -7 aa
ja ta re
n jin
fiTr av el s in in a,
; lhan e § Ra
M.A. Stein, ed., Ka
s,
Thomas Watter
Paige
e r e n c e G l o s s ary
Ref
in this
@? as a se pa rate volume
rms will appe
ar ch itectural te -
An annotated
gloss ar y of
nd ed on ly for reference.
sting is inte
f li
series; this brie ection
a s s u r a nce OF prot ll-frieze)
hand gestu
re o f
m o u l d i n gs below wa
h India.
dra nt (in Sout
Abhayamu moulded b
aseme
c r o w ning amal
aka
P
ab o v e
adhisthan
a ga placed
“sky” lin
a
akasaling rosary ion
re usedas decorat
akgamala divine figu
-dévata motif)
alarnkara aisle n d o w ( d ecorative
rmer-wi r@
t h India); do o f L atina-Naga
alinda nasi ( S o u
ning mem
b e r
l a n f r uit”; crow
alpanas! “«myro b o
ian spire
temples o w n i n g North Ind
amalaka stone cr
“ c o g g e d heel”
large laka)
than ama if)
aka (broader rative mot
amalasar
a n g o f ruits (deco x i t of immortal
ity
pu n c h o f m
cont a i n e l i
i n g v a s ? believed
amralumb crown i India)
ta e d h a ra (South
amrta-gha a c h
with det
re
anarpita “egg”: spi cture,
b u l a t ory f t e mple stru
daka sed a m ‘vis i o n o
anda, an i
a
andharik
ani ga
ankana
ankura
i
antarabhitt
antarala
a
antarapatt
ha
antarasak
396
Reference Glossary
caitya-gavaksa
hall o
caityagrha cus
nu's dis
m of Vis ta)
cakra d on kapo
tif place
Cakrapurusa
cakravaka ive motif)
per
jlion on up
camaradharini
campaka
candrasala
398
Reference Glossary
candraéalika
diminutive of candragala
candrasilq lowest step shaped like a “half moon”
candravalokana
ornate window, window for viewing the moo
n
candrika a
architectural member between am alaka and crowniin
ng
kalaga
capa
“bow”; apse
capdkara : apsidal
capétamudra
posture of administering a slap
cdrana
mythical flying ascetic
catuhsakha ~
having four s4khas
caturbhima
four storeyed
caturmukha
four-faced, four-doored
~
caturmukhalinga
four-faced linga
catuski
bay of four pillars
Catustala
four-storeyed
cauri
fly-whisk
cétiya
Prakrit form of caitya
cétiyaghara
Prakrit form of Caityagr
chadya ha
eave -~
channavira
ornamental jewelry re
chatra sembling a cross-brace
umbrella, a symbol of
chatradharini royalty
umbrella-bearing fe
Cippika male
minor cyma moul
citra ding
ornament, image,
citra-torana picture
ornamental tora
cla, cilika na-arch
“hair on crown”
; finial, crest
Danda
“staff”. pillar-s
dandacchadya haft
Straight eave
dandika as Opposed to
Pillaret
khuracchadya (curved eave)
darpana
“mirror” ; Circ
dévagrha ular decorative
motif
dévakéstha “house of a di
vinity”
dévakula niche for a
divinity
shrine
4%,
399
REFERENCE GLOSSARY
l shrine
dévakulika minor shrine, periphera
of the sikhara (Orissa)
demigod placed on top
dévalacarani
temple; shrine
dévalaya
ment committee
temple of manage
dévanikaya and demons”
of ° ‘fight between gods
mythical episode Nidhiputra
dévdsurasangrama “my thical treasure”;
form of
anthropomorphic
Dhanaputra
facetted
dharanvita
piece
facetted coping
dharanvita usnisa
facetted
dharavrta el of law”
Buddhist “whe
dharmacakra izance
banner, cogn
dhvaja
as standard
banner used arters”
dhvajastambha “e le ph ants 0 f the qu
four myth ical
diggajas ions
of the dire ct
eight guardians
Dikpdlas
kettle drum rius’’)
dimdima ed from «“qena
gold coin (adopt
dinara -bearer
female lamp
dipadharini temple-type
South Indian
Dravida Dravida type
spirelet of
od
Dravidakata s of Sun-g
42 varietie
dvadasadityas
door e
dvara r; doorway nich
gate chambe
dvarakésthaka an
door-guardi ment; doorjamb
dvarapala d o f do orframe ora
ba n orey
dvarasakha witha ta ll upP er st
gateway riratha)
dvarattalaka p l a n e s of offset (t
with two
dvi-anga yed
two-store
dvibhiama gakhas
having tw
d in
dvisakha (discusse
a t e r r a ced stupa
ling
e resemb
a temple-tyP ottara purana)
Edaka visnudharm face
jpuman
Givaliniga with on®
a
ékamukhaling single spize¢ a single pearl-strand
ékandaka pec
klace having
ékavali
400 Reference Glossary
ype)
va vase-and-foliage (pillar-t
ghatapalla form of Parvati
having “iguana” mount;
godhdsana
ve motif)
wave design (decorati
gomutrika sign)
“bull’s eye” (jali de
Gonétra ular roof-covering
circular purlin; circ
gopanasi tall upper storey
as city gateway with
gopurattalak
torque
graivéyaka head
gorgon or gorgon (decorative
grasa
s su sp en de d from grasamu khas
jingling bell
grasakinkinika motif)
chain of grasa mot ifs
grasamdla kha
he ad; kirttimu
a gorgon face or
grdsamukh a motifs
band of gras
grasapattaka
grasapatti, band of gras
a motifs
a)
grasapatt
ika (South Indi
of an u p pe storey
wall
grhapindi stupa
containing owning ama
laka
temple hall ar a an d c r
grha-stipa betw een th
e éjkh
neck; recess
griva l
closed hal
apa
gadhamand
otif)
der (dec orative m
goose, gan hamsas
Hamsa - a r c h a d o rne d with
torana
na
hamsa-tora amsas
band of h
hamsamala ndia)
s? e t (South I
air of gee cloistere d p a r a p
una of
hamsa-mith alustra de
g;arland; p torey
hara on the sky s hant trunk
pavilion ling @ Jep
harmya
hastihasta
rP
Thamrga v o l u t i o n of cate
“con otif)
illikavala
na ecorat i
galika (d
indusdlika
ha
Jadyakumb
jagati
Reference Glossary
Jahnavi Ganga
jakkhayatana (Prakrit) yaksa shrine
jala, jalaka
mesh design
jalamala garland of mesh design
jdlavatayana
window carved with mesh design
jali mesh, lattice, screen; perforated window
jambhaka
goblin
jangha
wall, wall frieze; elevatioh betwee
n véms
dibandha and §gikhara
jatajita
arranged mass of matted locks
jatamukuta
crown of matted locks
Kacchapa
tortoise
kadalikakarana
corbelling (construction tec
kaksdsana hnique)
seat-back
kalaga
“pitcher”; torus moulding
kalika
bud (conical decorative
kalpavalli mot if)
wish-fulfilling vine
kampa
rectangular fillet (Sou
kandabhitt; th India)
garbhabhitti, sanctum
kandhara wall
broad recess between
kankanapatra mouldings
“serrated leaf” (decor
kahkanapatra-pat ative motif)
ti register of kankanap
kantha atra design
neck; recess betw
kantha-patti een mouldings
frieze in the kant
kapili ha
kapigirsa, kapisi wall Projecting in front of the sanctum framing
P
rsaka a vesti ibule
Parapet
kapéta
roll-cornice; ov
kapétapaili, ka erhanging corn
potéli ice
Cyma-eave
kapétapalika cornice
Cyma-eave
karimakara cornice
fanciful form
karna of Crocodile
karnaka angle, corner: ©o
rner wall-divisio
arris Mould n
karnakundala ing on Pill
ar ¢ apital
karnakata earring
Miniature Square
structure On Corn
er of superstruc
ture
SARY
REFERENCE GLOS
venukosa
comer band of sikhara;
karnalata
corner amalaka
karnamalaka
corner spirelet
karnandaka
corner frieze
karnapattika c oming at the corn
er
miniature temple kosa
karnaprasada
of th e sp ir e (Or issa); karnalata, venu
corner band
karnaratha
corner bastion
karnattalaka s moulding
knife-edged arri
r jangha)
karnika arly synonym fo
“waist”; wall (e
kati
fanciful figure
kautuka
plain recess
khalva Sakha
plain recessed
khalvasakha curve d spire)
gm en t (o f outer band of
se
form
khanda
ston e of fo
undation plat
cap-
kharasila
ornate niche
ban dha
khattaka ing of vedi
basal mould bha mouldings
khura
e x of kh ur a and kum
comp l
khura-kumbha , awning
curved eave
khuracchadya
pell-garland
kinkinimala usician
celestial m l
le minstre
kinnara
ce of a d ivine fema
fa
kinnarivaktra rown
conical c
mukha
kiritamukuta e of g l o r y” gra:ga
“fac g course
kirttimukha ve ceilin
“boat m decorati
kéla
storeroom pet al pattern
th lot us-
késthika ma moulding wi
minor cy
h course
ksu drapadma minor g
ub-p lint
ksudropana pilaster
kudyastambha aputraka
atlas; bh ar g
diband ha mou Jdin
kumara “pot” ye
kumbha pillar bas
e
stomach
kumbhaka w i t h fa ce in the
gana
kumbhanda illaret
pase of p
kumbhika ulding
torus mo
kumuda
sary
404 Reference Glos
kunda tank
kunda a type of flower
kunjardksa a perforated decorative design
Kata superstructure-type
kita square aedicula; spirelet; kutagara
kitagdara a square chamber on the upper storey; p square mi iniature
shrine
kutdgarasala rectangular miniature shrine
katakara resembling square aedicula
Madhyabandha
middle band
madhyalata
central band of Latina
Sikhara
madhyasakha
central sakha of the
door
madhyaéala
central hall
mahddvara
principal gate
Mahdékéla
Saiva dvarapala
mah4éndsi
large gavaksa do
mah4patta, rmer (South In
dia)
mah4apatti,
mahGpattika broad band
Mahardjalilasang
“royal”? sittin
mahavihdraq g Posture
eminent Budd
makarg hist monast
ery
“rocodile-mons
makara-prandlq ter: dolphin
Makara-shape
d Bargoyle
REFERENCE GLOSSARY
m makaras
torana-arch emanating fro
makara-t6rana
ara; Ganga
goddess riding on a mak
makara-vahini
d
garland; decorative ban
mala
carrying garland
a flying celestial figure
mala-vidyadhar
garland-bearing
maladhara
garland-frieze
malapattika of a mala
gakha in the form ral festoons
malasakha
-p ar t be lo w ca pi ta l decorated with flo
pillar
malasthana g cord
ig ht li ne ma rk ed by a measurin
st ra
manasutra
dais
res
manca
ik e mo ul di ng supporting figu
dais -l
mancika
diagram
mandala with c olumns
hall, generally e with pillared
walls
mandapa a; te mp le -t yp
mandap
diminuti ve of
Mu ndamala
mandapika and usual ly
threshold
ce nt ra l part ofo rnate
proj ec ti ng kati; wall
an d below chadya;
mandaraka ure abov e ja ga ti
tem ple struct
s vase
mandovara age: auspici ou
vase and foli wi th rosettes (d
e corative
a at in g
mangalakalas monds al te rn
ban dof dia
manibandha motif)
ndant
jewelled pe
manipadaka e motif)
ls (decorativ
manipattl, band of jewe
manipattika
spirelet oulding
manjari c u s h i o n -shaped m
“Jentil”’;
masuraka
ee
y
monaster
tern and
matha mother-go
ddess
e d w i t h vedika pat
n t
ck ora’ me base
matrka , seat-ba ign at the
kaksasana h a n t - h e a d d e s
el1e p
mattavaran
@ often with
peacock
stupa
mayura a s e m e nt terrace of
b of aram
the head square
médhi t e ; w i t h ri o u s f o rms from
mons ning va
ar -t yPe c ombi
mésavyala “mixed ” ; pi ll
Miésraka to circular
s couple
auspiciou
mithuna
sary
406 Reference Glos
N abhicchanda
type of ornate ceiling with deep concentric band
s
ndga
cobra; snake
nadgapdséa
design of intertwined serpents
Ndgara
generic name for North Indian tem
Nagardja ple-type
anthropomorphic cobra-kin
g
ndgasakha
sakha with naga pattern
ndgi, ndgini
female serpent
nakula, nakulaka
a type of purse
Nandi (Nandin, Na
ndi) Siva’s bull
Nandi
name of Saiva dvar
Nandi-mandapa apala
Pavilion for Siva’s bull
ndsi ;
gable-end of a wagon-vault;
(South India) ga va ks a or “‘caitya-arch” mol
De ti
navabhima i
nine-storeyed
Navagrahas
nine planets
navandaka
having nine Spir
navanidhis es
nine mythical
treasures
407
REFERENCE GLOSSARY
mythical treasure
nidhi
treasure-vase
nidhighata
treasure-vase
nidhikalasa of “mythical treasure”
anthropomorphic form
nidhiputra
without ambulatory
nirandhara
lotus
Padma
lotus-capital
padmabharana
lotus petal
padmadala
lotus vine
padmalata tus leaf
lotus foliage, lo
padmapatra
lotus frieze
padmapattika ceiling
lotus-pendant of
padmasila
lotus umbrella
padmatapatra as padmalata
lotus vine, same
a)
padmavalli ana (South Indi
lotus-formed up
padmopana
five-storeyed Si va , Surya, Ganapa
ti, and
: Vi sn u,
pancabhuma v e divinities
worship of fi
sana
paficadevopa Sakti
five-spired
paficandaka ets (tri-anga)
with five offs
pancaratha hav ing five
gakhas
paricasakha
five-storeyed
parcatala five-shrined f);
ive moti
a ri ne (decorat later texts)
pancayatan s i d a l sh
front of ap of Latina gikhara (in
d
panjara central ban
register
pankti axe
parasu female attendant rame
e t i n u e 02 image-f
paricarika jmage-fra
me : r
parnapatti
408
Reference Glossary
REFERENCE GLOSSARY
REFERENCE GLOSSARY
openings
dra temple-type with four
sarvatobha
four-faced image
sarvatobhadrika
segments
a curvature of six
satkhanda rékh e
free feeding-hous
sattra
ksmi
a frieze depicting La
saubhagyapatt celestial ascetic
siddha
t
pinnacle, cres (South India)
sikha
(N or th In di a) ; crowning dome
towe r, spire
sikhara
minor spire
sikharika pediment
single candrasala
simhakarna
lion’s head per storey
simhamukha o w pr oj ec ti ng from an up
bay-win d
simhapanjara
lion’s head
simhavaktra r
lion monste
simhavyala t
pillar bracke r platform ©
f sikhara
pe
Sirsa, éirsaka oulding;
fl at up
shoulder m
bhi roof
skandha
o w e r p r o f ile ofa Vala
l band
skandha-védi carved
ed frieze;
ornament
éobhapattika
steps
decorative
steps e pattern (
series of ic al fo li ag
d vert
ly detaile
distinctive
grivrksa motif) attern
e d w i t h srivrksa p
v
gakha car
érivrksasakha spirelet
srmga pillar
larets
stambha uP of pil
gril Je made pillar
a of a
stambhajalak the for m
gakha in
stambhasakha
sthana
stupa
subhadra
kanasika
gukanasa, $U
ndrasalas)
suparna
huna
suparna-mit
gu rasen
aka
éarasend,
Reference Glossary
Tala storey
talapatra
palm-leaf
tamala, tamalapatra
leaf of xanthochymus pictorius (decorative motif)
tankitamarica
carved dais
tantraka
frame, line
taranga
wave (bracket-type)
taranga-potika
pillar-bracket adorned with “wave”
design
tati, tatika minor dish-moulding over laguna
thakara
minor caitya-dormer; candrasal
ika
tilaka
minor niche with samvarana roo
tirtha
f
sacred spot (near water)
torana
gateway; archiform gateway-p
torana-prasada attern
mansion pattern on ga
teway
tri-anga
with three planes of off
tribhanga sets
triple bend of human
tribhima figure
three-storeyed
trigunasitra
three-fold cord (delineation of
trikhanda rékha sikhara’s curvature)
Curvature of three seg
tripatta ments
with three facets
tripatta kumuda
kumuda moulding
Tripurusa with three facets
a type of prasada ha
triratha ving three sanctu
ms
with three Projec
trigakha tions
.
with three Sakhas
trisila
trident
Tristilapuru
sa
tritala anthropomorphic form
of Siva’s trisala
three- storeyeq
trivali-Sirase
ng
foliate Pedi
tula ment of thre
e parts
tulapitha joist, jOist-
end
frieze of JO
tuldsangrahq ist-endgs
Series of j
Oist-ends
413
REFERENCE GLOSSARY
attic pillar
Uccalaka
to Varuna
a minor divinity allied
Udadhikumar cted caitya-dormers (ca
ndrasalas)
pediment of interconne
udgama
threshold set
udumbara
a nking but forming
part of the central off
mi no r of fs et fl
upabhadra ng
sub-plinth mouldi
upana pitha
substructure of
upapitha storey
sky storey, UPP&
uparitala India)
ulding (South
upper fillet mo
|
ardhvakamp
a -petal pattern
rt ed cy ma -r ecta with lot us
| a inve
urdhvapadm
coping
ches
usnisa tting 00 haun
posture of si
utkutikasana ter lily
blue lotus; wa outh India)
utpala of th e en tablature (S
architrave lintel, beam
uttara th ee ntablature;
architra ve of wning slab of
pe rs tr uctures cro
uttaranga pe! part 0 f su
vedi on up andha
éikhara; sk
uttaravédi curvilinear
mount
Vahana (South Ind
ia)
p e r b a n d
vajana, vajana
pattl, g up
projectin )
vajanapa tt ik a
lt (as weapon
thunderbo
vajra e seat
ada mantin ara
gala-sikh
Vajrasana - type with
temple -tyPe
hi temple
Valabhi t° Valab
belonging
ja
Valabhicchanda curved rafter motif)
valika c r o l l ( d ecorative
s
creepel: per d esig
n
valli (valli) r v e d w ith cree
gakha ca y Visnu
valligakha g a r l a n d worn b
long
motif)
vanamala
n d s ( d e corative aps
a, o n o f garla
yandanamal fest o
jangha
yvandana li
ma a
l l ; t a n k m e n t s e parating
-w e ion#! e
l e
p
e a r a p e t s elevat i
vapi mfoeuldi edh
kha al sero
varandika from gi w ith flor
r v e d
and ca
proad p
ka
vasantapatti
sary
414 Reference Glos
REFERENCE GLOSSARY
female yaksa
yaksi, yaksini
staff
yasti the practice of yoga
ar f ti ed ro un d th e knees to assist in
sc
yogapatta
a n d T e m p l e I n d e x
Site
ows:
g li st is ar ranged as foll
followin
Informatio n in the re nce. Plate refere
nce.
. Ma p re fe fe re nc e;
Site name ference; Fi
gure re
page re
Temple name: apsidal: 11; B1.ede
bas-reliefs:
loam 222. ; 494-496.
Bodhigharas:
Wo
iva: 246; 98 katagara:
6; 1.
Ahicchatra.
20.
terraced ick:
br 26. eiremains: 392.
AihoCalekr.a:27288:9-290;
1 13; 600-601. Aphsad. 102. 3; 473 244-246.
Visnu: 412-11
0; 615. coin
Durga: 298-30 302; 121; 622-623 Audumbara ls: 10; 10
Galaganatha: 9; 123; 628, 630-634. avilion de
mo
30 60, 86
Huccapayy4: 4-296: 116; 08-610
. Aurangabad. ; 159. 220.
Hucc im al li : 29
2; 119 ; 61 6- 61 8. cave no. 1:7696-99; 40b; 162, 193-194,
30 0- 30 59 599
8- r caves:
Mallikarjuna: 37-2893 112:
othe
0: 7.
Suryanaray30an a: 9-621. Avantipur. 35 153e; 754-75
373; 144, 153d;
2; 120; 61 Avantisvara:
37 1-
7¢,
Tarappa: 8-371; 14
36
. Avantisvam!:
Ajanta. 4, 60-77; 31, 32a, 344; 430-
158,
0-753-
74 734-738, 74
caves:
160-161. i
198.
Akhédar. eee so Mahaknre
Badam see al 159;318
411-412. ee
20 2; 79 b-c;
Peaet: 124,
ampur. 31
4 125, 128b; 636» Badoh. 4
322-324 a: 18959
‘Arka-Brahmd: mandapik.
639, 643. 326. 1360; 669-67
2.
Baigra™-
Bala-Brahma: 332-333; Re 24- as
126% 5,
63
Garuda-Brahm a:
320-322; 124
Kuméra-Bra64hm0-4:642- stup er
637-638, 3343 3 pe e190;3398:ga; 770; 368-37
9%
Padma-Brahma: 330-332; 129; 13 samdah
nandatan srap
adu. 314
Svarga-Brahm
662-668. 4-645, .678:
658-660, 126, 128¢;
64 A
98 1550 77
ae
32 4; si
Vira-Brahm a: mos a 380 gah, 15
669-672 pethamand
647, 66
33 3- 335; 1364;
Vigva-Brahma parabat 4
i. 26 107, 411b; event
Amangaim ésvara
268-270;
424.
Pagc patesara-
572-576.
4,
Amaravati.
l a t for™ 6.
altar-p
Index
418 Site and Temple
bhaga.
Jhalrapatan. See Gandra
189; 72b; 363-366.
Kalikamata: 188- Jhamra. 168.
.
Rajal-véjal mata: 190 Sun: 191; 72c.
Dvarka. 168, 198. Jhinjhurijhar (Dhani).
; 80; 419, 421.
Suvarnatirtha: 205 caves: 16.
Jogésvari. 86.
3-181.
cave: 88-89; 17
198.
Janagadh. 4, 168,
Elephanta. 86. caves: 16.
1: 90- 91; 35b;
189-192.
Dhrevad.
Jani Dhrévad. See
cave no.
cave no. 2:90.
cave no. 3: 89; 185.
4: 89; 36; 186. . 314.
Kadamarakalava : 324; 127, 128d; 648-651.
cave no.
33; 187-188.
__ cave no. 6:90; §ivanandisvara 9; 650-651.
Ellora. 86. subsidiary shrines: 326-32
97-99; 40e.
cave no. 9, facade: de: 99; Kadvar. 168.
k arm4), faca 480-181; 71a;
334-339,
cave no. 10 (Visva Dasavatara:
.
40c-d; 213, 217 396-397.
Daégavatdra cave,
8-160; 321.
124.
345; 681-685. Kadwaha.
asthana-mandapa:
37-40a, 40c-e;
3,
495-20 Gandal matha: 45
other caves: -219,
216, 218
Kalavad. 198. 204; 81.
206-211, 214- Kotéesvara:
Eran. 20.
: 40; 63-64.
Kalsar. 168.
351-352.
Garuda stan dard old: 187;
5s 35-37. 86.
Narasimha: 33-3 Kanhéri. 4, 3ab.
oO. 1; 81-82;
;
Vardaha: 40; 62.
40.
Visnu and other:
Fathgadh. 350.
451-152; 772-774-
Siva: 380-385;
.
Gadhwa. 2032 ; 32-33.
remains:
Garur.
Siva: 38 8.
ulwada). 60.
Gh otkaca (G
at
cave: 73-77.
198.
Ghumili. 168,
sa ri , 0.
Sonkan 748; 353-36
: 48 7- 18 8; 72a,
nowt
384.
no. 8: 193;
Gokarna. 86.
; 467-168.
apsidal: 87
Gokul. 20.
Siva: 26.
Gap. 168. ; 328-333-
17 9; 69-70, 75
ald 47 7-
Guniyar.
392.
temple: 391-
124. fan
Gyaraspur. nasarovard
Ath e ma
pote
420 dex
Site and Temple In
Odadar.
Atijanimata: 194-195; 71
Gorakhmatha no. h; 399, ie
1, See Anjanimata.
421
| Mis
u n n a m e d : 349; 70
2-703. 261-263.
Paunar. 60.
| remains: 62
Pawaya. 20.
.
| terraced V
0.
isnu: 24.
e a si
177-778
Payar. 35
iva; 388-3915
Pindara. 168. 362.
old: 188; 74
h;
Pipariya. 20.
73.
Visnu: 44;
2-
Rajgir. 4, 20, 10
422
Site and Temple In
Sirpur. 222.
Buddhist viharas: 232; 88, Tigawa. 20, 150.
91¢c; Kankali Dévi: 35; 16; 38-44.
461-463.
Laksmana: 233-236; 89, 91d remains: 164; 324, 326.
; 464-473, Tumain. 20.
Rama: 236; 90, 91e-f;
478-479,
Sohgaura. doorframe: 32; 34.
bronze plaque, model:
10; 9.
Sondani (Mandasor).
138,
fragments: 142; 286-28
7, 290.
Sonkh (Mathura). Udayagiri (M.P.). 20.
apsidal naga: 12. caves: 28-30; 11-26.
Srinagar (Gujarat). 168, structural: 30.
Surya: 189; 71;. Udayagiri (Orissa). 4.
Vindhyavasini: 189 apsidal] Jaina: 12.
; 71e, 78b.
Tin agar (Kashmir). 350
, Uskar. 350.
ankardcarya: 358-360;
139, 143a; stupa: 367; 730.
704-707,
Sutrapada, 198,
Sun: 200-202;
79a; 410,
Varanasi: 20.
Taksagila (Taxil architectural fragments: 122; 266.
a). 4,
apsidal: 11, Varman.
Tala. 222.
Siva: 85b.
Siva: 227-230; 86;
Tapar, 444.454. Surya: 85c.
Vidisa. 124.
Visnu: 368; 142 Garuda-dhvajas: 10-11.
731-733, 739 » 143f, 147b, 153¢; Visavada. 168.
old (Sankha-dérun): 190; 71d; 370.
hy
Be
ty We
PEA
it7 Wn i! the
Mtge
mis : ty) t
v4
Vig Vr
La
| ‘MICHAEL W. MEISTER, editor of the
Encyclopaedia of Indian Temple Architecture, is Professor
and Chair, Graduate Group in the History of Art,
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. He
received his Ph.D. from Harvard University. His
work has been particularly on form and significance
in the Indian temple. His edited volumes include
Discourses on Siva and Making Things in South Asia: The
Role ofArtist and Craftsman.
“AH
~
; ee:
ae~
— ao
,oR
.
4
’tet.
<—
58
am if
~
7
=
=