Nugraha 2022 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2243 012039
Nugraha 2022 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2243 012039
Nugraha 2022 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2243 012039
E-mail: heri.nugraha@lipi.go.id
1. Introduction
During measurement, the thermoelectric properties of thermocouples may decrease, especially when
measured at higher temperatures or as a result of mechanical stress [1]. When thermocouple wires are
exposed to heat, this degradation might affect their performance. For accurate measurements using
thermocouples, it is necessary to determine possible inhomogeneities in the thermocouple wires [2].
Inhomogeneity detection has two main objectives, namely to detect the distribution of any
inhomogeneities in the thermocouple wire, and to determine the minimum uncertainty when the
thermocouple was used [3][4].
As the temperature varies, the alloy's structure gradually changes, sometimes permanently, to the
lowest energy state at that temperature. Because the Seebeck coefficients of the different phases are
usually different, hysteresis effects occur when the phases change (where the reading depends on
previous temperature exposure) [5][6].
A heat gun was used for a source of temperature and to perform scanning of a thermocouple sensor
it takes approximately 1 hour and to facilitate monitoring of changes in temperature and distance for
each movement of the scan on the sensor. The thermocouple inhomogeneity test equipment was
developed with a real monitoring system to monitor temperature and distance changes at each movement
of the heating system.
In previous research, We have built a thermocouple inhomogeneity measurement system. This
equipment was used for scanning thermocouple wire in a long-distance scanning of about one meter.
Hot air was used for the heating source that can reach up to temperatures to 600 oC. In previous studies,
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
9th Asian Physics Symposium 2021 (APS 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2243 (2022) 012039 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2243/1/012039
thermocouple wire measurements were made at temperatures of 120 oC and 300 oC with a temperature
and distance parameter monitoring system in the laboratory and could not be accessed or monitored
remotely. In this study, we have been measured type T thermocouple sensor and validated the data with
liquid bath and we developed an internet of things for easily monitoring temperature and distance using
the ESP 32 wifi module as a control for sending data from the sensor thermocouple and ultrasonic to an
open-source Thingspeak then control for switch off the heat gun if there was abnormal condition if the
temperature reaches higher than setting temperature.
Ice bath
Sensor 1
Sensor 2 Hot air
Sensor 3
Thermocouple
Sensor
Stepper Motor
Microcontroller
Control
Ice bath
2
9th Asian Physics Symposium 2021 (APS 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2243 (2022) 012039 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2243/1/012039
button on the heat gun, the heat gun used can produce an output temperature ranging from 50 oC to 630
o
C. Meanwhile, to ensure the output temperature between the heat gun and the heat received by the
thermocouple is the same, a monitoring sensor is used to read the temperature, including reading the
temperature of both sides of the thermocouple with two LM35 temperature sensors. To maintain a stable
temperature on both sides of the heating part of the thermocouple wire, an air pump is used to cool the
temperature on both sides of the thermocouple during heating. Meanwhile, to maintain the reference
temperature and the hot junction at 0 oC, ice baths are used at both ends of the thermocouple.
(a) (b)
Figure 2. (a). Set up thermocouple inhomogeneity measurement system, (b). Control panel with ESP 32
Figure 2 shows the set-up thermocouple inhomogeneity and control panel. The voltage and
temperature parameters generated during the measurement are sent data via the wifi module ESP 32
then can be accessed via thingspeak and android application. Both the reference and measurement
junctions are preserved at 0 oC. To provide quick heating over a system testing is a step to ensure the
system can function properly in thermocouple testing with the local heating method. As a result, include
a position indicator, x, which can be readily expressed as the distance from the hot junction, as follows:
𝑇2
𝑉 = ∫ 𝑆(𝑥, 𝑇)𝑑𝑇 (1)
𝑇1
where the integration of S(x, T) is performed for T, with S varying as a function of both x and T. The
output of a thermocouple is the sum of increments of emf, dV, generated as a result of temperature
increments, dT, integrated around the complete circuit. The resultant can be written as integration from
T1, the cold junction temperature, to T2, the hot junction temperature.
3
9th Asian Physics Symposium 2021 (APS 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2243 (2022) 012039 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2243/1/012039
Using a double gradient method, the results of this investigation for real-time monitoring
inhomogeneity showed that thermocouple types T thermocouple with diameters of 0.35 mm do present
typical trends of repeatability. To make sure the real temperature was used for the sensor test, here was
the result of the scanning result temperature heat gun, the data collected from thingspeak.
4
9th Asian Physics Symposium 2021 (APS 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2243 (2022) 012039 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2243/1/012039
(a) (b)
Figure 6. (a) Display from android application. (b) Display data of microcontroller
Figure 6 (a) shows for free android application thingspeak viewer to display the data. While input
for the same ID with thingspeak, the android application thingspeak viewer display real-time data, and
figure 6 (b) display data from the terminal of the microcontroller. One of the measurements of the T-
type sample in a liquid bath at a temperature of 120 oC along a length of 30 cm to determine the
correction value for the thermocouple.
We have measured type T thermocouples using the local heating method and liquid bath. Based on
previous research from Webster, it was stated that the use of thermocouples or scanning at temperatures
below 200 oC would not affect the inhomogeneity of the thermocouple. Thus, in the procedure for this
research step, a thermocouple sample was scanned at a temperature of 120 oC in a liquid bath and local
heating. The following are the results of measurements on a sample of type T.
(a) (b)
Figure 7. (a). Measurement at liquid bath, (b). Seebeck Inhomogeneity of thermocouples
The graphic profiles as shown in Figures 7. a and 7. b regarding the results of the measurement of
the voltage in the liquid bath (mV) before and after scanning by local heating method and the S
inhomogeneity (Sinh) resulting from the results of calculations on the local heating method show a
relatively similar profile from the same distance of wire. The graph of voltage and S inhomogeneity
tends to decrease due to the response of the thermocouple wire to the temperature measurement received
from the heat source in the liquid bath and heat gun. The Seebeck voltage is proportional to the difference
in temperature at the time of measurement. To get a better accuracy value in the liquid bath, more
measurement data is needed by representing the measurements at each temperature in the liquid bath,
then interpolation calculations are carried out to get the Seebeck value. The results showed the
percentage of inhomogeneity in the liquid bath before exposure to heat during local heating scanning
was 0.05781% and after scanning at local heating was 0.0596%. From these results, the relative
inhomogeneity did not change significantly. The same thermocouple was scanned on the local heating
method with a temperature of 120 oC and calculated for the entire length of the thermocouple and a
length of 20 cm on the part of the thermocouple immersed in a liquid bath to compare the results of the
inhomogeneity.
5
9th Asian Physics Symposium 2021 (APS 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2243 (2022) 012039 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2243/1/012039
4. Conclusion
The system created can retrieve temperature and distance data on the thermocouple inhomogeneity
equipment and the data that has been taken can be displayed on the website in graphical form both
temperature and distance with thingspeak and android application connected from the internet via ESP
32 wifi module. The development of a remote monitoring system makes it easier for users to be able to
monitor every process in a measurement system to reduce errors or errors in the running process of the
plant that has been built. The data temperature from this measurement was used for calculation Seebeck
inhomogeneity. The resulting testing of thermocouple type T with temperature 120 oC then validate with
liquid bath relatively have a similar profile in the liquid bath before exposure to heat during local heating
scanning was 0.05781% and after scanning at local heating was 0.0596%.
References
[1] E. S. Webster, “Low-Temperature Drift in MIMS Base-Metal,” pp. 574–595, 2014.
[2] M. Holmsten, J. Ivarsson, R. Falk, and M. L. L. Josefson, “Inhomogeneity Measurements of
Long Thermocouples using a Short Movable Heating Zone,” pp. 915–925, 2008.
[3] E. Webster and D. R. White, “Thermocouple homogeneity scanning,” Metrologia, vol. 130, p.
130.
[4] E. S. Webster, “Seebeck Changes Due to Residual Cold-Work and Reversible Effects in Type
K Bare-Wire Thermocouples,” Int. J. Thermophys., pp. 1–18, 2017.
[5] M. Science and K. S. Gam, “Change in inhomogeneity with temperature between 180 ° C and
950 ° C in base-metal thermocouples Change in inhomogeneity with temperature between 180
° C and 950 ° C in base-metal,” no. May 2009, 2016.
[6] L. F. Ramírez-garcía and O. L. Arnache-olmos, “Design of a Scanning Seebeck Coefficient
Apparatus : A Tool for Testing Inhomogeneities in Thermoelectric Materials,” vol. 66, no. 11,
pp. 3007–3011, 2017.
[7] C. Series, “An investigation of the base metal thermocouples uncertainty components in ILC
comparison An investigation of the base metal thermocouples uncertainty components in ILC
comparison,” 2018.
[8] E. S. Webster, “Thermal Preconditioning of MIMS Type K Thermocouples to Reduce Drift,”
Int. J. Thermophys., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2017.
[9] N. Ismail et al., “Smart irrigation system based on internet of things (IOT),” J. Phys. Conf.
Ser., vol. 1339, no. 1, 2019.
[10] M. Alvan Prastoyo Utomo, A. Aziz, Winarno, and B. Harjito, “Server Room Temperature &
Humidity Monitoring Based on Internet of Thing (IoT),” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1306, no. 1,
2019.
[11] D. Parida, A. Behera, J. K. Naik, S. Pattanaik, and R. S. Nanda, “Real-time environment
monitoring system using ESP8266 and thingspeak on internet of things platform,” 2019 Int.
Conf. Intell. Comput. Control Syst. ICCS 2019, no. Iciccs, pp. 225–229, 2019.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by collaboration program with Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia-LIPI
and Badan Standardisasi Nasional-BSN