Prasad
Prasad
Prasad
Communications Systems
Ramjee Prasad
In a classical parallel-data system, the total signal frequency band is divided into
N nonoverlapping frequency subchannels. Each subchannel is modulated with a
separate symbol, and then the N subchannels are frequency multiplexed. It seems
good to avoid spectral overlap of channels to eliminate interchannel interference.
However, this leads to inefficient use of the available spectrum. To cope with the
inefficiency, the ideas proposed in the mid-1960s were to use parallel data and FDM
with overlapping subchannels, in which each, carrying a signaling rate b, is spaced b
apart in frequency to avoid the use of high-speed equalization and to combat impul-
sive noise and multipath distortion, as well as to use the available bandwidth fully.
Figure 1.10 illustrates the difference between the conventional nonoverlapping
multicarrier technique and the overlapping multicarrier modulation technique. By
using the overlapping multicarrier modulation technique, we save almost 50% of
bandwidth. To realize this technique, however, we need to reduce cross talk between
SCs, which means that we want orthogonality between the different modulated
carriers.
The word “orthogonal” indicates that there is a precise mathematical relation-
ship between the frequencies of the carriers in the system. In a normal FDM system,
many carriers are spaced apart in such a way that the signals can be received using
conventional filters and demodulators. In such receivers, guard bands are intro-
duced between the different carriers and in the frequency domain, which results in a
lowering of spectrum efficiency.
It is possible, however, to arrange the carriers in an OFDM signal so that the
sidebands of the individual carriers overlap and the signals are still received without
adjacent carrier interference. To do this the carriers must be mathematically
orthogonal. The receiver acts as a bank of demodulators, translating each carrier
down to dc, with the resulting signal integrated over a symbol period to recover the
raw data. If the other carriers all beat down the frequencies that, in the time domain,
have a whole number of cycles in the symbol period T, then the integration process
results in zero contribution from all of these other carriers. Thus, the carriers are
Ch.1 Ch.2 Ch.3 Ch.4 Ch.5 Ch.6 Ch.7 Ch.8 Ch.9 Ch.10
(a) Frequency
Savings in bandwidth
Frequency
(b)
Figure 1.10 Concept of the OFDM signal: (a) conventional multicarrier technique, and (b)
orthogonal multicarrier modulation technique.
1.2 Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiplexing 13
Frequency Frequency
(a) (b)
Figure 1.11 Spectra of (a) an OFDM subchannel, and (b) an OFDM signal.
14 Introduction
• OFDM is an efficient way to deal with multipath; for a given delay spread, the
implementation complexity is significantly lower than that of a single-carrier
system with an equalizer.
• In relatively slow time-varying channels, it is possible to enhance capacity sig-
nificantly by adapting the data rate per SC according to the signal-to-noise
ratio (SNR) of that particular SC.
• OFDM is robust against narrowband interference because such interference
affects only a small percentage of the SCs.
• OFDM makes single-frequency networks possible, which is especially attrac-
tive for broadcasting applications.
On the other hand, OFDM also has some drawbacks compared with single-
carrier modulation:
Multicarrier techniques:
Robustness against frequency selective fading
A lot of know-how obtained through research and
development of wireless LANs and digital broadcasting
Synergistic effects when combined with CDMA
Radio
communications and
access techniques in
4G systems
E ∝ m.c 4 (1.1)
tio
n ns
a atio
u nic unic
o mm mm
ac o
i
es sc
Goal ed
lt im i rel (c) Contents
Mu fw
(m
)
io no d )
lut ase
Ev
o -b
(IP (c) Communication
(E)
technology
(c) Consumer
electronics
(c) Computer
technology
Time