0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views6 pages

ISID InfectionGuide Chapter24

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 6

GUIDE TO INFECTION

CONTROL IN THE HOSPITAL


CHAPTER 24:

Emergency Department and


Receiving Areas
Author
P. Suri, MD
R. Gopaul, MD

Chapter Editor
Gonzalo Bearman MD, MPH, FACP, FSHEA, FIDSA

Topic Outline
Key Issues
Known Facts
Controversial Issues
Suggested Practice
Suggested Practice in Under-Resourced Settings
Summary
References

Chapter last updated: February, 2018


KEY ISSUES
• Healthcare workers in the emergency department and receiving areas
need to be aware of the risks posed by blood and airborne infections,
and take measures to limit exposure through early identification and
isolation of high risk patients.
• It is mandatory to identify and isolate patients with highly contagious
infections (e.g., tuberculosis) or when exposure to a bioterror agent is
known or suspected.

KNOWN FACTS
• Universal precautions are promoted by the US Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention because when patients initially present seeking
medical care, it is often not known if their blood may contain hepatitis B
or C viruses, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or other pathogens.
All blood should be considered potentially contaminated, and efforts
should be made to avoid direct contact, mucous membrane exposure,
and sharp injuries.
• In addition, respiratory protection is prudent when caring for patients
with suspected or confirmed tuberculosis or other highly contagious
airborne infections (e.g., SARS)

Controversial Issues

• With respect to isolation, there are limited data comparing the cost and
efficacy of different methods (provider face masks, negative pressure
rooms, etc.). The type of isolation used is based on the mode of disease
transmission. Overall, the costs associated with initiating basic isolation
precautions are usually low and the benefits far outweigh the expense.

1
• The benefit of ventilation measures in the hospital on tuberculin
conversion in healthcare providers is still under investigation. Higher
tuberculin conversion rates have been reported among personnel who
work in non-isolation patient rooms or rooms with fewer than 2 air
exchanges per hour. Guidelines for the prevention of nosocomial
transmission of tuberculosis recommend minimum air change rates of 2
to 15 per hour.
• There are scarce data on the ability of healthcare workers to identify
patients at risk for transmitting infections. Patients with active
pulmonary tuberculosis are often missed at emergency triage. In
retrospect, some of these patients may have presented with typical
symptoms and risk factors that are easily overlooked in a busy triage
environment. Each emergency department should evaluate its process
to see if opportunities for earlier diagnosis of tuberculosis exist.

SUGGESTED PRACTICE
• Provide patient educational materials about hand and respiratory
hygiene/cough etiquette in emergency receiving and waiting areas.
• Mandatory careful hand hygiene, preferably with alcohol based hand
sanitizer, before and after each patient encounter.
• Gloves and isolation gowns should be worn when contact with blood
and body fluids is likely.
• Goggles or face masks should be worn when splashing of blood or body
fluids is anticipated.
• Appropriately sized face masks should be worn in cases of suspected
airborne infection (e.g., tuberculosis, SARS)
• Triage personnel should be trained to identify high-risk patients with
potential communicable infections.

2
• Patients who appear unusually ill, especially with cough, should be
isolated (>3 feet (1 m) distance) or provided a mask to limit risk to
healthcare personnel and other patients.
• Patients who may have had a chemical exposure from a bioterror attack
should be isolated and decontaminated as soon as possible.
• Efforts should be made to minimize staff flow between isolated and
non-isolated patients.

SUGGESTED PRACTICE IN UNDER-RESOURCED SETTINGS:


• A preventive strategy to infection control should be the priority and is the
most cost-effective approach.
• Adherence to national guidelines with respect to occupational health
and immunization of healthcare workers.
• Offer provider education and training in standard infection control
measures (hand hygiene, PPE (personal protective equipment), aseptic
technique, disposal of sharps).
• Mandatory careful hand hygiene before and after each patient encounter
is a priority. Alcohol-based sanitizers are preferred and a cost-effective
alternative in areas without running water or a functioning sewage
system.
• Healthcare workers should wear PPE (gloves, isolation gowns) when
contact with blood or body fluids is suspected. Goggles or face masks
should be worn when splashing of blood or body fluids is anticipated.
• Triage personnel should be trained to identify high-risk patients with
potential communicable infections and efforts should be made to
isolate such individuals.
• Efforts should be made to minimize staff flow between isolated and
non-isolated patients.
• Adequate decontamination of equipment between patients.

3
• Surveillance mechanisms should be implemented for evaluation of
infection control measures

SUMMARY
• The adoption of reasonable healthcare safety precautions, as listed
above, can minimize transmission of most contact-related infections in
the emergency department. All personnel handling blood, body fluids, or
sharps should be vaccinated against hepatitis B. Providing and using
sharp containers reduces the risk of bloodborne infections.
• Risk of airborne infections can be minimized through use of rooms with
exhaust fans or adequate ventilation.
• Occupational exposure to blood or droplets should be reported. Post-
exposure counselling and therapy, if necessary, should be offered to all
clinical personnel.

REFERENCES
1. CDC. Updated U.S. Public Health Service Guidelines for the
Management of Occupational Exposures to HBV, HCV, and HIV and
Recommendations for Postexposure Prophylaxis. MMWR 2001;
50(RR-ll): 1–52; available at
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5011a1.htm.

2. CDC. Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Healthcare


Facilities. MMWR 2003; 52(RR-10): 1–42; available at
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5210a1.htm.

4
3. Menzies D, Fanning A, Yuan L, et al. Hospital Ventilation and Risk for
Tuberculous Infection in Canadian Healthcare Workers. Canadian
Collaborative Group in Nosocomial Transmission of TB. Ann Intern
Med 2000; 133(10): 779–89.

4. Damani N. Simple Measures Save Lives: an Approach to Infection


Control in Countries with Limited Resources. J Hosp Infect. 2007;
65:Suppl 2:151-4.

5. Sokolove PE, Rossman L, Cohen SH. The Emergency Department


Presentation of Patients with Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Acad
Emerg Med 2000; 7(9): 1056–60

6. Siegel, JD, Rhinehart E, Jackson M, Chiarello L, and Healthcare


Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. 2007 Guideline for
Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents
in Healthcare Settings. Am J Infect Control. 2007; 35(10 Suppl
2):S65-164; available at http://www.ajicjournal.org/article/S0196-
6553(07)00740-7/pdf.

You might also like