Sem - 1 - Revision - HL MS
Sem - 1 - Revision - HL MS
Sem - 1 - Revision - HL MS
1. [1 mark]
Markscheme
C
2. [1 mark]
Markscheme
B
3. [4 marks]
Markscheme
C
4. [1 mark]
Markscheme
A
5. [1 mark]
Markscheme
B
6. [1 mark]
Markscheme
D
7. [1 mark]
Markscheme
C
8. [1 mark]
Markscheme
D
9. [1 mark]
Markscheme
D
10. [1 mark]
Markscheme
B
11. [2 marks]
Markscheme
«energy dissipated in friction =» 0.03 × 55 × 9.8 × 2.0 «= 32.3»
hence use result to show that block cannot reach C
FOR EXAMPLE
total energy at C is 670 − 32.3 − 646.8 = −9.1 J
negative value of energy means cannot reach C
Allow ECF from (a)(ii).
Allow calculation of deceleration (a = –0.29 m s–2) using coefficient of dynamic
friction. Hence KE available at B = 628 J.
12a. [3 marks]
Markscheme
ALTERNATIVE 1
«deceleration» = 3.41
14.0
«= 0.243 m s−2 »
F = 0.243 × m
0.243×m
μ= m×9.81
= 0.025
ALTERNATIVE 2
distance travelled after release = 23.85 «m»
KE lost = 5.81m «J»
KE lost 5.81m
μd = mg×distance
= 23.85mg
= 0.025
Award [3] for a bald correct answer.
Ignore sign in acceleration.
Allow ECF from (a) (note that μ = 0.0073 x candidate answer to (a) ).
Ignore any units in answer.
Condone omission of m in solution.
Allow g = 10 N kg–1 (gives 0.024).
12b. [3 marks]
Markscheme
normal force, upwards, ignore point of application
Force must be labeled for its mark to be awarded. Blob at poa not required.
Allow OWTTE for normal force. Allow N, R, reaction.
The vertical forces must lie within the middle third of the stone
weight/weight force/force of gravity, downwards, ignore point of application
Allow mg, W but not “gravity”.
Penalise gross deviations from vertical/horizontal once only
friction/resistive force, to left, at bottom of stone, point of application must be
on the interface between ice and stone
Allow F, μR. Only allow arrows/lines that lie on the interface. Take the tail of
the arrow as the definitive point of application and expect line to be drawn
horizontal.
Award [2 max] if any force arrow does not touch the stone
Do not award MP3 if a “driving force” is shown acting to the right. This need
not be labelled to disqualify the mark. Treat arrows labelled “air resistance” as
neutral.
N.B: Diagram in MS is drawn with the vertical forces not direction of travel
collinear for clarity
13a. [2 marks]
Markscheme
F= Δ mv /m Δ v / 0.058×64.0 ✔
Δt Δt 25×10−3
F = 148 «N»≈150«N» ✔
13b. [2 marks]
Markscheme
ALTERNATIVE 1
1 2 1 2
2 mv 2 ×0.058×64.0
P= t
/ −3 ✔
25×10
P = 4700/4800«W» ✔
ALTERNATIVE 2
64.0
P = averageF v/ 148 × 2 ✔
P = 4700/4800«W»✔
13c. [2 marks]
Markscheme
horizontal component of velocity is 64.0 × cos 7∘ = 63.52«ms−1 » ✔
t =« 63.52
11.9
»0.187/0.19 «s» ✔
13d. [3 marks]
Markscheme
ALTERNATIVE 1
uy=64sin7/7.80«ms –1» ✔
decrease in height = 7.80 × 0.187 + 12 × 9.81 × 0.1872 / 1.63«m» ✔
ALTERNATIVE 2
vertical distance to fall to net «=2.80 – 0.91» = 1.89«m» ✔
1
time to fall this distance found using «1.89 = 7.8 t + 2 × 9.81 × t 2»
t = 0.21«s» ✔
«reaches the net before it has fallen far enough so goes over»
13e. [2 marks]
Markscheme
ALTERNATIVE 1
Initial KE + PE = final KE /
1
2 × 0.058 × 642 + 0.058 × 9.81 × 2.80 = 1
2 × 0.058 × v2 ✔
v = 64.4«ms−1 » ✔
ALTERNATIVE 2
vv =«√7.82 + 2 × 9.81 × 2.8» = 10.8«ms−1» ✔
«v = √63.52 + 10.82»
v = 64.4«ms−1» ✔
13f. [3 marks]
Markscheme
so horizontal velocity component at lift off for clay is smaller ✔
normal force is the same so vertical component of velocity is the same ✔
so bounce angle on clay is greater ✔