Characteristics of Drainage Morphologica
Characteristics of Drainage Morphologica
Characteristics of Drainage Morphologica
www.ijrsg.com
butaries that flow nearly parallel to one another and all the
tributaries join the main channel at approximately the same
angle. Parallel drainage suggest that the area has a gentle,
uniform slopes and with less resistant bed rock. A radial
drainage pattern forms when water flows downward or out-
ward from a hill or dome. The radial drainage pattern of
channels produced can be linked to a wheel consisting of a
circular network of parallel channels flowing away from a
central high point (Jensen, 2006). The properties of the
stream networks are very important to study the landform
making process (Strahler and Strahler, 2002).
IV Order
V Order
I Order
Basin
Total
Length Ratio
Length (km)
Area (km2)
Bifurcation
(km/km2)
racteristics streams of relatively smaller lengths are characte-
Drainage
Density
Basin
Ratio
ristics of areas with larger slopes and finer textures. Longer
lengths of streams are generally indicative of flatter gra-
dients. Generally, the total length of stream segments is
maximum first order streams and decreases as the stream
1 19.75 55.55 3.37 2.81 5.80
order increases. The numbers of streams of various orders in
the hilly terrain are counted and their lengths from mouth to 30.6
2 5.58 6.97 1.25 20.00
drainage divide are measured with the help of ArcGIS ver- 8
sion 9.3.1 software. The length of the first order stream is 3 41.46 89.04 2.79 2.15 2.43
maximum in all the 14 micro watersheds (Table 2). 4 17.97 52.40 3.69 2.92 2.96
5 31.77 95.15 2.67 2.99 2.69
Table 2. Stream length (in kilometers) for the different
orders for Kolli Hills 6 41.70 109.19 2.54 2.62 2.12
I Or- II III IV V 7 43.55 107.85 3.70 2.48 2.83
Basin Total
der Order Order Order Order 8 39.59 110.62 2.85 2.79 3.03
1 37.13 14.91 3.51 - - 55.55 9 49.09 143.65 2.08 2.93 1.73
2 6.75 0.22 - - - 6.97 10 18.44 59.27 2.66 3.21 1.68
3 60.7 17.72 6.98 1.58 2.06 89.04 11 29.89 88.97 2.88 2.98 2.31
4 34.88 14.59 2.93 - - 52.40 12 51.27 142.22 2.25 2.77 2.01
5 63.1 21.95 6.11 3.99 - 95.15 13 47.79 160.51 3.57 3.36 3.45
6 72.42 20.6 11.24 4.93 - 109.19 14 43.39 151.87 2.58 3.50 2.19
7 72.83 19.51 13.26 2.25 - 107.85 To- 481.2 1373.2 68.3
38.76 55.23
8 77.44 22.68 5.94 4.56 - 110.62 tal 5 6 0
9 86.83 27.25 17.94 11.63 - 143.65
10 41.1 11.72 6.45 - - 59.27 Bifurcation Ratio (Rb)
11 63.95 15.72 9.3 - - 88.97
Bifurcation Ratio is defined as the ratio of the number of
12 89.77 28.68 14.98 8.79 - 142.22
streams of any given order to the number of streams in the
13 106.02 36.94 3.68 3.61 10.26 160.51 next lower order. The average of all these ratios gives the
14 102.65 33.1 16.12 - - 151.87 bifurcation ratio. The term was introduced by Horton in
1932. Bifurcation ratios characteristically range between 3
Drainage Density and 5 for watershed in which the geologic structures do not
distort the drainage pattern (Strahler, 1964). However, the
Drainage Density is defined as the total stream length in 2ed micro watershed shows an average bifurcation ratio of
a given basin to the total area of the basin, (Strahler. 1932, 20. This is mainly due to the fact that the basin area is very
1945). It is related to various features of landscape dissec- small and consists only of 1st and 2nd order streams and
tion such as valley density, (Montgomery and Dietrrich, there is a big difference in the frequencies between the suc-
1994; Tucker and Bras, 1998), channel head source area, cessive orders.
(Montgomery and Dietrich, 1989), climate and vegetation,
(Moglen et al. 1998), soil and rock properties, (Smith, 1958;
Kelson and Wells, 1989), relief (Montgomery and Dietrich,
ISSN No: 2319-3484 Volume 3, Issue 2, March 2014 54
International Journal of Remote Sensing & Geoscience (IJRSG)
www.ijrsg.com
youth mature and old stages of the life cycle of the tributary Mexico, USA. Earth Surf. Processes Landforms, v.14,
basins. Kolli hills shows a circulatory ratio of 3.63 (Table 5), pp.671-690.
whereas 1st and 2ed micro watersheds was appears to be the [8] KRISHNAMURTHY, J., and SRINIVAS,G. (1995)
most mature micro watershed with a circulatory ratio of 1.31 “Role of geological and geo-morphological factors in
and this watersheds is in the youth stage of its development groundwater exploration: a study using IRS LISS da-
with a circulatory ratio of 1.88. This anomaly is mainly due ta”, Int. Jour. Remote Sensing, v.16, pp.2595-2618.
to the diversity of slope and relief present in the watershed. [9] MOGLEN, G.E., Eltahir, E.A. and BRas, R.L. (1998)
On the sensitivity of drainage density to climate
Conclusions change. Water Rsour. Res., v.34, pp.855-862.
[10] MONTGOMERY D.R. and DIETRICH, W.E. (1988)
The quantitative analysis of morphometric parameters is Where do channels begin? Nature, v.336, pp.232-234.
found to be of immense utility in kolli hills area are evalua- [11] MONTGOMERY, D.R. and Dietrich, W.E. (1989)
tion, watershed prioritization for soil and water conservation, Source areas, drainage density and channel initiation.
and natural resources management at micro level. The mor- Water Resour. Res., v.25, pp.1907-1918.
phometric analysis carried out in the Kolli hills area shows [12] NARENDRA, K., and NAGESWARA Rao, K.
that the micro watersheds are having high relief of the ter- (2006) “Morphometry of the Mehadrigedda wa-
rain and elongated in shape. Drainage network of the study tershed, Visakhapatnam district, Andhra Pradesh us-
area exhibits as mainly sub-dendritic and radial type which ing GIS and Resourcesat data”, Jour. Indian Soc. Re-
indicates the dipping and jointing of the topographical land mote Sensing, v.34, pp.101-110.
form. The morphometric parameters evaluated using GIS [13] SCHUMM, S.A. (1963) Sinuosity of alluvial rivers on
helped us to understand various terrain parameters such as the great plains. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. v.74,
nature of the bedrock, infiltration capacity, runoff, etc. pp.1089- 1100.
[14] SMITH K.G (1950) Standards for grading texture of
erosional topography. Amer. Jour. Sci., v.248,
Acknowledgments pp.655-668.
The author expresses a heartfelt thanks to the CSIR, Gov- [15] SMITH K.G. (1958) Erosional processes and landforms in
ernment of India for providing financial assistance to ex- Badlanda National Monument, South Dakota. Grol, Soc.
ecute this work. The author also expresses sincere thanks to Arner. Bull., v.69, pp.975-l008.
Geological survey of India. [16] SRIVASTAVA, V.K., and MITRA,D. (1995) “Study
of drainage pattern of Raniganj Coalfield (Burdwan
District) as observed on Landsat-TM/IRS LISS II im-
References agery, Jour. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, v.23,
[1] AGARWAL, C.S., (1998) “Study of drainage pattern pp.225-235.
through aerial data in Naugarh area of Varanasi dis- [17] STRAHLER, A.N. (1964) Quantitative geomorphology of
trict, U.P.”, Jour. Indian Soc. Remote Sensing, v.26, drainage basins and channel networks. In: VT. Chow (Ed.),
pp.169-175. Handbook of Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York,
pp.439-476.
[2] BISWAS, S., SUDHAKAR, S., and DESAI, V.R.
[18] STRAHLER, A.N., and STRAHLER, A.H. (2002) A Text
(1999) “Prioritisation of sub-watersheds based on Book of Physical Geography, John Wiley & Sons, New
morphometric analysis of drainage basin - a remote York.
sensing and GIS approach”, Jour. Indian Soc. Remote [19] TUCKER, G.E. and BRAS, R.L. (1998) Hillslope processes
Sensing, v.27, pp.155-166. drainage density and landscape morphology. water Resour.
[3] GREGORY, K.J. and WALLING, D.E. (1973) Drai- Res., v.34, pp.275l-2764.
nage Basin Form and Process. A Geomorphological
Approch, Edward Arnold, London.
[4] HONRON, R.E. (1932) Drainage basin characteris-
tics. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, v.13, pp.350-361.
[5] HORTON, R.E. (1945) Erosional development of
streams and their drainage density: hydrophysical ap-
proach to quantitative geomorphology. Geol. Soc.
Amer. Bull., v.56, pp.275-370.
[6] JENSEN, J.R. (2006) Remote Sensing of the Envi-
ronment, Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd., New
Delhi, 1st edition.
[7] KELSON, K.I. and WELLS, S.G. (1989) Geologic
influences on fluvial hydrology and bedload transport
in small rnountainous watersheds, northern New
ISSN No: 2319-3484 Volume 3, Issue 2, March 2014 56
International Journal of Remote Sensing & Geoscience (IJRSG)
www.ijrsg.com
Biographies
VINOTH. M received the M.Sc., Degree in Geoinformat-
ics from Annamalai University of Tamilnadu, in 2011 and
now he is doing Senior Research Fellow (SRF) in centre for
Applied Geology from Gandhigram Institute – Deemed Uni-
versity. Email: vingis4u@gmail.com