1 s2.0 S0924013622002497 Main
1 s2.0 S0924013622002497 Main
1 s2.0 S0924013622002497 Main
Pore formation and melt pool analysis of laser welded Al-Cu joints using
synchrotron radiation
S. Hollatz a, *, M. Hummel b, A. Olowinsky a, A. Gillner a, b, F. Beckmann c, J. Moosmann c
a
Fraunhofer Institute for Laser Technology ILT, Steinbachstr. 15, 52074 Aachen, Germany
b
Chair for Laser Technology LLT, RWTH Aachen University, Steinbachstr. 15, 52074 Aachen, Germany
c
Institute of Materials Physics, Helmholtz-Zentrum HEREON, Max-Planck-Str. 1, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Associate Editor: Hui-Ping Wang Known as challenging material combination, the welding of aluminium and copper, both with strongly different
thermophysical properties, causes joining failures such as pores, cracks or intermetallic phases in the solidified
Keywords: welding area. To investigate the mixing of the materials and the occurrence of pores, the laser welding process is
Laser welding observed with synchrotron radiation which visualizes the phase boundaries between solid, liquid and gaseous
Synchrotron
material phases. This allows the visualization of pore formation and density differences of the materials inside
Aluminium
the melt pool. In this investigation, pore formation in front and bottom of the keyhole is observed. The movement
Copper
Melt pool dynamics of the bubbles in the melt pool can be tracked until solidification at the material transition. Regarding the
Pore formation intermixing of the materials, the high-speed images show a fluctuating copper flow towards the keyhole and a
material mixing over the entire aluminium melt pool depth. By understanding the mechanisms, compensatory
measures for an improved process can be developed to enable the usability of aluminium and copper connec
tions, for example in electromobility applications.
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: soeren.hollatz@ilt.fraunhofer.de (S. Hollatz).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117738
Received 7 April 2022; Received in revised form 20 July 2022; Accepted 27 July 2022
Available online 29 July 2022
0924-0136/© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-
nc-nd/4.0/).
S. Hollatz et al. Journal of Materials Processing Tech. 309 (2022) 117738
different welding arrangements, for example Cu on top of Al or vice the high energy beamline P07 (EH4) of Petra 3 at Deutsches Elektronen
versa. The weld seam geometry in cross section has been analysed, Synchrotron DESY in Hamburg, Germany (Schell et al., 2013). To
resulting in a wider weld seam on aluminium side due to the lower observe the welding process, the x-ray radiation is transmitting the
thermal conductivity and melting point. Hardness measurements sug metal probe and is detected by a CdWO4 (Cadmiumwolframat) scintil
gest the occurrence of intermetallic phases (Balu et al., 2011). Further lator. Using a Photron Fastcam SA5, the intrinsic glow of the scintillator
research is dealing with the influence of the laser parameters and the screen stimulated by the X-rays is recorded. The pictures were taken
usage of beam oscillation on mechanical and electrical properties of the with 1024 × 768 pixels with a frame rate of 1 kHz and 1 ms exposure
dissimilar joint. Kraetzsch et al. (2011) could achieve crack free welds time. The synchrotron setup and parameters are shown in Table 1.
by using a high frequency beam oscillation. Dimatteo et al. (2019) have The setup for the laser welding includes a high-speed axis to apply
discovered increase mechanical properties by decreasing the penetra the feed rate, a scanning system with optics and the laser beam sources.
tion depth in lap joints. An investigation of the intermetallic phases For the investigations two laser beam sources with different spot di
relative to the percentage of aluminium in the melt pool has been con ameters are used. A schematic of the setup is shown in Fig. 1.
ducted by Bantel (2018). The EDX analysis leads to the conclusion, that a More information about the set up can be found in Wagner et al.
higher percentage of aluminium in the melt pool reduces the occurrence (2021).
of critical intermetallic phases and improves the mechanical properties
of the lap joint. Measurements of the electrical resistance of each 2.1. Laser beam characteristics for experimental investigation
intermetallic phase were performed by Rabkin et al. (1970). Compared
to the base material, the resistance increases for all intermetallic phases. To compare the influence of different spot diameters on the shape of
For the theta phase, there is an increase by a factor of almost six. the keyhole, a single-mode fibre laser and a multi-mode disk laser are
A major influence on intermetallic phase and crack formation is the used. The characteristics of the laser beam sources are shown in Table 2.
mixing of the materials. This in turn is dependent on the melt pool dy The used laser beams sources differ by a factor of about three in the
namics, caused by the vapor capillary and the weld depth as a measure resulting focal diameter. The laser beams are guided through a scanner
for the material ratio in the melt (considering a lap joint). Using an x-ray system and f-theta optics to the workpiece surface. The beam position is
phase contrast method, the keyhole and solid-liquid interface can be fixed, while the workpiece is moving with the feed rate. The stationary
observed during laser welding. Miyagi et al. (2017) have identified in laser beam is necessary to have a fixed position for the x-ray beam. The
stabilities at the keyhole bottom as a reason for porosity formation in scanner system is used to initially arrange the laser beam and to apply a
aluminium using x-ray analysis. They have observed pores, formed at circular spatial power modulation. Thus, the following results differ in
the keyhole bottom, moving towards the surface, and being trapped at focal diameter, laser power, feed rate as well as amplitude (radius) and
the solid-liquid interface in the back of the melt pool. Keyhole in frequency of the spatial power modulation.
stabilities are also identified by Fetzer et al. (2018) as a main driving
force for the formation of pores in aluminium welding with x-ray anal 2.2. Material preparation for X-ray analysis
ysis. As a different method to identify pore formation during the welding
process, a butt joint configuration with glass and stainless steel can be The workpieces for the investigation are based on 3 mm thick metal
used. The laser beam is focused on the steel close to the edge. With this sheets which are irradiated by the x-rays. The material samples are
setup, Xu et al. (2018) have observed a keyhole fluctuation and collapse, 30 mm in height and 100 mm in length. For the investigation of the
resulting in bubble formation. dissimilar lap joints, sheets with 0.5 mm in height are welded to the top
Cunningham et al. (2019) suggest a relationship between the of the base metal sheets. As top layers Al99.5 and Cu-ETP are used with
appearance of pores and the aspect ratio of the keyhole depending on the CuSn6 and Al99.5 as base materials. The properties of the used materials
ratio of laser power and feed rate. By using x-ray synchrotron radiation, are shown in Table 3.
they could observe keyhole instabilities and bubble formation while
welding titanium alloys for application in laser powder bed fusion. A 2.3. Process observation with synchrotron radiation
detailed visualisation of a keyhole collapse, bubble formation and an
analysis of the bubble size including a pore splitting are published by The captured grey scale images are post processed using shading
Zhao et al. (2020). They assume that acoustic waves as well as a fluc technology and Kalman filtering (Kalman, 1960) to improve the visi
tuating keyhole can drag away the bubbles from the keyhole to the so bility of the phase boundaries and contrasts. Images are recorded with a
lidification area resulting in pore trapping. The acoustic waves occur frame rate of 1000 images per second. In Fig. 2 individual frames of
after the bubble has detached from the keyhole, as it contracts into a three different welding processes are compared as an example. On the
sphere. left, a bead on plate welding of aluminium is shown as a reference. The
Welding aluminium and copper, x-ray analysis additionally enables phase boundary of the melt pool and the keyhole are visible, while the
the visibility of the material mixing due to different density. Leitz (2016) position of the laser beam is indicated. Using aluminium and copper
derives melt pool flows from x-ray videography and metallographic connections, the higher optical density of the copper material prevents
analysis for an aluminium and copper welding process. The results of an visibility inside the copper.
x-ray analysis for aluminium and copper welds are also addressed in this However, in the aluminium material of the dissimilar joints the
paper. In contrast to the existing investigations, synchrotron radiation is keyhole, partially the phase boundary of the melt pool, pores and darker
used in this work with the goal of improving the quality and contrast of veils in the melt pool can be identified. These darker areas aren’t visible
the images. The pore formation and movement as well as the melt pool
dynamics are in the focus of the discussions. To analyse in detail the Table 1
formation mechanisms in dissimilar material welding configurations, Characteristics and parameters of the synchrotron (Hummel et al., 2021).
aluminium and copper are welded in overlap configuration with two
Parameter Unit P07 Petra 3
different infrared laser beam sources of different laser focus diameters
(see Table 2). Operation Mode [-] Low Beta
Photon energy [keV] 37,7
Beam area [mm2] 2×2
2. Experimental setup for laser welding of aluminium and Scintillator material [-] CdWO4
copper with synchrotron radiation Scintillator size [mm2] 11 × 11
Scintillator thickness [µm] 300
Distance scintillator – material sample [mm] 800
The experimental setup for this investigation is based on the usage of
2
S. Hollatz et al. Journal of Materials Processing Tech. 309 (2022) 117738
Fig. 2. Synchrotron images of the configurations (left: Al99.5 bead on plate, centre: Al99.5 to CuSn6, right: Cu-ETP to Al99.5).
3
S. Hollatz et al. Journal of Materials Processing Tech. 309 (2022) 117738
Fig. 3. Bubble formation in front of the keyhole - aluminium on copper (PL = 750 W, vf = 50 mm/s, df = 34 µm, Δt = 1 ms, related video sequence online available:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6411749).
Fig. 4. Floating bubbles in the aluminium melt pool – aluminium on copper (df = 117 µm; left: PL =1000 W, vf = 50 mm/s; right: PL = 1500 W, vf = 100 mm/s).
3.1.2. Copper on aluminium welds movement. The movement direction is changed, and the upward
When changing the top material from aluminium to copper, the pore movement prevented.
formation and movement in the melt pool ground becomes visible, see Additionally, it can be assumed that there is a movement in the
Fig. 5. The bubbles occur in the keyhole ground and are moving along image plane, vertically to the feed direction in frame 4–6. Due to the
the melt pool ground (B). Due to the lower thermal conductivity, the narrower copper melt pool, the copper shades are penetrating centrally
copper melt pool on top is smaller than the aluminium melt pool below. into the aluminium. The forward copper flow pushes the bubble to the
The bubbles, moving along the solidification line, are trapped in the melt pool sidewall where it solidifies as a pore. This hypothesis is sup
material transition and solidify as pores (A). Some of them detach from ported by the metallographic analysis in Fig. 8 which shows pore for
the keyhole ground and directly rise to the material transition (C). Both mation at the upper part of the lower joining partner at the outside of the
motion paths show two distinct flow fields within the melt pool (metal weld seam.
vapour induced flow and capillary flow) (Beck, 1996). The presented experimental results require a further investigation to
The cross-section of the weld seam confirms the effect, see Fig. 6. The outline the influence of the laser spot diameter and process parameters
number of pores in the lower aluminium material is significantly higher on the pore formation as well as a visibility with the given observation
than in copper. In the transverse cross-section one of the pores is trapped method inside the copper material.
directly under the unmolten copper material. The longitudinal cross-
section indicates pores along the whole depth of the weld seam.
The intermixing of the materials can also have an influence of the 3.2. Analysis of melt pool dynamics
bubble movement and prevents their rising to the surface. In Fig. 7, the
movement of a pore is marked in an image sequence. The last image The intermixing of the materials is a major concern during the
summarizes the movement path on one specific bubble indicated with welding of aluminium and copper due to the formation of intermetallic
the number of the images and the resulting path geometry. In the images phases. In the following, the movement and mixing of the copper in the
4–6 dark shades (e.g. copper melt) are influencing the bubble aluminium melt pool is analysed. Using synchrotron radiation, new
opportunities in the analysis are available compared to conventional
Fig. 5. Pore formation and movement in the melt pool ground – copper on aluminium (PL = 1000 W, vf = 50 mm/s, df = 117 µm, Δt = 2 ms, related video sequence
online available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6411749).
4
S. Hollatz et al. Journal of Materials Processing Tech. 309 (2022) 117738
Fig. 6. Transverse and longitudinal cross-section of the weld seam – copper on aluminium.
Fig. 7. Bubble movement influenced by material intermixing – copper on aluminium (PL = 1500 W, vf = 100 mm/s, df = 117 µm, Δt = 2 ms, related video sequence
online available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6411749).
1 is mixed along the whole depth, the copper flow with increased feed
rate is much smaller and closer to the material transition. It is to be
mentioned, that the increase of the feed rate leads to a reduction of the
weld depth. The marked weld depth is determined by analysing the full
video due to the challenging visibility in a single frame.
Images 3 and 4 are welded using a circular spatial power modulation.
Again, the mixing appearance is different compared to frames 1 and 2.
The higher frequency of the oscillation leads to a more homogeneous
mixing of the materials in frame 4. Both comparisons allow the
assumption that due to the higher movement speed of the laser beam on
the material surface and thus of the keyhole in the melt, the flow vectors
Fig. 8. Transverse cross-section to confirm the appearance of pores at the are more strongly aligned in the horizontal direction and thus less
outside of the weld seam – copper on aluminium. mixing of the materials can take place in the vertical direction. On the
other hand, more bubbles along the material transition are visible as
metallographic analysis. The image sequences analysed in this investi well. Especially for the high dynamic spatial power modulation a higher
gation are showing a batchwise flow of copper from the backside of the frame rate needs to be achieved for the synchrotron analysis to capture
melt pool, see Fig. 9. The material is flowing towards the keyhole, where every position of the keyhole inside the melt pool. Typical oscillation
it is entrained by the capillary flow and swirled into the aluminium. The frequencies up to 1000 Hz are not covered with the actual set up but are
copper is mixed along the whole depth of the weld seam. subject to further investigations.
The same phenomenon is visible in the experiments with the smaller
spot diameter. Using the parameters mentioned in Fig. 10, the copper
shades are moving towards the keyhole and are pushed to the melt pool 3.3. Discussion of the melt pool movement in aluminium and copper
ground while intermixing with the aluminium. welding
Depending on the laser beam diameter, the images are showing a
significant difference in the appearance of bubbles. While the welding Based on the results, a schematic illustration of the melt flow for
process with df = 117 µm, shown in Fig. 5, Fig. 7 and Fig. 9, lead to aluminium and copper welds can be created, see Fig. 12.
bubbles, the welding process with df = 34 µm has no visible bubble in During evaporation in the keyhole, the metal vapor rises and causes
the presented sequence in Fig. 10. an upward melt flow along the capillary wall. A backward flow of ma
The welding parameters have a strong influence on the intermixing terial occurs due to the movement of the keyhole through the metal. It
of the materials. In Fig. 11, single frames of four different parameter sets can be assumed that the combination of flow mechanisms creates a
are presented. Frames 1 and 2 differ in the feed rate. While the copper in backward vortex in the copper. The copper is entering the aluminium at
the end of the copper melt pool. Due to the wavy melt pool surface
5
S. Hollatz et al. Journal of Materials Processing Tech. 309 (2022) 117738
Fig. 9. Copper flow towards the keyhole – copper on aluminium (PL = 1000 W, vf = 50 mm/s, df = 117 µm, Δt = 1 ms, related video sequence online available:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6411749).
Fig. 10. Copper flow with smaller laser spot diameter – copper on aluminium (PL = 750 W, vf = 50 mm/s, df = 34 µm, Δt = 1 ms, related video sequence online
available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6411749).
Fig. 11. Parameter-dependent copper flow (1 (Basic parameters): PL = 750 W, vf = 50 mm/s, df = 34 µm, 2: vf = 100 mm/s, 3: As = 0,2 mm, fs = 250 Hz, 3: As
= 0,2 mm, fs = 500 Hz).
characteristic the batchwise copper flow is induced. The higher density Especially the influence of different parameters, as indicated by
of copper supports the penetration of the copper melt into the doubling the feed rate in Fig. 11, has a major influence on the melt flow.
aluminium. (Leitz, 2016) explained the vertical backward flow with the With regard to a comparison of the two beam diameters, it can be stated
evaporation pressure that accelerates the melt in front of the keyhole. By that the batchwise penetration of the copper melt in the direction of the
reaching the keyhole, the copper shade is accelerated to the melt pool keyhole occurs in both cases but differs in terms of the intensity and size
ground and moves along the solidification border to the back of the melt of the copper stream. To gain further information about the melt flow,
pool. Comparable to the bubble movement the copper flow is deflected the visibility of the copper melt pool in the x-ray analysis should also be
at the material transition due to the smaller copper melt pool. A mixing achieved in further investigations.
along the whole depth is visible.
The illustrated melt flows are approaches for an explanation of the 4. Conclusion
material mixing. The high dynamics of the flows in the melt pool lead to
complex flow situations, which are shown in simplified form in Fig. 12. In conclusion, it was shown that high energy synchrotron radiation is
For the confirmation of the hypotheses, further investigations with able to give an insight into the welding process of aluminium and cop
higher temporal resolution of the imaging method are necessary. per. The approach can help to understand the melting and mixing
6
S. Hollatz et al. Journal of Materials Processing Tech. 309 (2022) 117738
Data Availability
Melt pool boundary Links to high speed videos are included in the paper.
7
S. Hollatz et al. Journal of Materials Processing Tech. 309 (2022) 117738
with brilliant fiber lasers. Phys. Procedia 12, 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. Schmidt, Philipp A.; Schweier, Markus; Zaeh, Micheal F. (2012): Joining of lithium-ion
phpro.2011.03.018. batteries using laser beam welding: Electrical losses of welded aluminum and copper
Lee, S.Shawn; Kim, Tae H.; Hu, S.Jack; Cai, Wayne W.; Abell, Jeffrey A. (2010): Joining joints. In ICALEO 2012, pp. 915–923. doi: 10.2351/1.5062563.
Technologies for Automotive Lithium-Ion Battery Manufacturing: A Review. In Schmitt, F., 2012. Laserstrahl-Mikroschweißen mit Strahlquellen hoher Brillanz und
Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering örtlicher Leistungsmodulation. Dissertation. RWTH Aachen University. Aachen:
Conference, pp. 541–549. doi: 10.1115/MSEC2010–34168. Shaker.
Leitz, Andreas (2016): Laserstrahlschweißen von Kupfer- und Aluminiumwerkstoffen in Sicius, Hermann, 2021. Handbuch der chemischen Elemente. Springer Berlin Heidelberg,
Mischverbindung. Dissertation, Universität Stuttgart. München: Herbert Utz Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg.
(Laser in der Materialbearbeitung - Forschungsberichte des IFSW). Wagner, Jonas, Hagenlocher, Christian, Hummel, Marc, Olowinsky, Alexander,
Miyagi, Masanori, Kawahito, Yousuke, Kawakami, Hiroshi, Shoubu, Takahisa, 2017. Weber, Rudolf, Graf, Thomas, 2021. Synchrotron X-ray analysis of the influence of
Dynamics of solid-liquid interface and porosity formation determined through x-ray the magnesium content on the absorptance during full-penetration laser welding of
phase-contrast in laser welding of pure Al. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 250, 9–15. aluminum. Metals 11 (5), 797. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11050797.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.06.033. Wieland SMH (2018): Werkstoff-Datenblatt: EN AW-1050A. Available online at 〈htt
Rabkin, D.M., Ryabov, V.R., Lozovskaya, A.V., Dovzhenko, V.A., 1970. Preparation and ps://www.wieland-smh.de/files/smh/wieland_smh/dat%20sheets/EN-AW-1050A
properties of copper-aluminum intermetallic compounds. Powder Met. Met. Ceram. _DE.pdf〉, checked on 7/23/2021.
9, 695–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00803820. Xu, J., Rong, Y., Huang, Y., Wang, P., Wang, C., 2018. Keyhole-induced porosity
Schell, Norbert; King, Andrew; Beckmann, Felix; Fischer, Torben; Müller, Martin; formation during laser welding. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 252, 720–727.
Schreyer, Andreas (2013): The High Energy Materials Science Beamline (HEMS) at Zhao, C., Parab, N.D., Li, X., Fezzaa, K., Tan, W., Rollett, A.D., Sun, T., 2020. Critical
PETRA III. In Mechanical Stress Evaluation by Neutrons and Synchrotron Radiation instability at moving keyhole tip generates porosity in laser melting. Science 370
VI 772, pp. 57–61. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.772.57. (6520), 1080–1086. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd1587.