Brahmanic & Shramanic
Brahmanic & Shramanic
Brahmanic & Shramanic
Introduction
Pre-colonial Indian thought has multiple traditions. 3 most prominent traditions are
Brahminic, Shramanic, and Islamic. 4th tradition is Syncretic tradition. It is the synthesis of
these traditions.
Ancient Indian political thought, before Islam came into India, has two main traditions
Brahminic and Shramanic.
Shramanic traditions (originating from Sanskrit word ‘Shram’- labour) include heterodox
(unorthodox) traditions such as Nath Panth, Yoga, Siddha, Tantric, Bhakti,Jainism,
Buddhism, Ajawika, Lokayata of Charvaka etc.
religious supremacy
classic or orthodox
memory tradition
caste system
Brahman - head
Kshatriya - arms
Vaishya - thighs
Shudras - foot
anyone doesn’t belong to any of this caste they are not considered as a human
Sacrifice
killings of animals for to get blessing from god and connect with divine power.
women
heterodox in nature
Danda & Dharma : this was the common point between two traditions, both believed in this.
Danda means punishment by force to maintain harmony, peace and social order
Caste system :
● shramanic tradition rejected caste system and questioned supremacy of brahmins.
● they did not believed in the universality of caste and critisized the inequality shrudras
faced
● caste system was a clear cut division of labour were brahmanis and kshatriya hold high
positions .
● they believed that one does not become brahmin by birth , it is by purity of heart , act ,
moral and wise
Authority of vedas :
Brahmanical tradition considers Veda as ultimate truth, knowledge and the most sacred gift of
the God Brahma. Vedas hold the supreme authority in Brahmanism and brahmans hold the
responsibility to spread its teachings among the society.
On the other hand Shramanic rejects the authority of Vedas as ultimate truth and knowledge.
Shramanic criticize Brahmans on the ground that they are unable to trace the author of Vedas.
Brahmans believe that the author of Vedas is God. But the shramanic tradition argues that the
brahmans are the author of Vedas and they have written it to establish their monopoly and
deviate the masses from the real question. They rejected Vedas as authoritative and eternal on
the grounds that as it is written by humans, not God it neither can be eternal nor divine.
belief in god :
Brahmanic tradition considered the world as the creation of God. They regarded God as the
savior of humankind. On the other hand Shramanic tradition rejected this idea, they didn’t
believe in the existence of God and argued that the world is created by natural powers and law of
nature and not by god. Shramans also believed the powerful human teacher is the savior of the
world. Such as Buddha, Mahavira, etc. Brahamans also believed that Pain and suffering is given
by God, Shramans rejected this idea as well and put forward the doctrine of Karma. Shramanic
tradition believed in Karma rather than God and rituals and argued that pain and suffering is due
their failure or karma and God has no role to play in it.
conclusion
One can conclude that Brahmanical and Shramanic traditions are key to understanding entire
political thinking in India as far as the ancient period is concerned. We can also find its impact
and influence on contemporary political thought. Brahmanic tradition has a rigid and exclusive
approach whereas Shramanic tradition has more of an egalitarian and inclusive approach.