Self As Unity

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 13

PHILOSOPHY

Unit #4 Human person


as unity
Unit #4 Human person as unity

At the heart of
philosophizing about the
human person is the desire
and the attempt to answer
the question “Who am I?”.
Philosophy in our world

There’s an old saying that


goes: Tell me who
your friends are, and I’ll tell
you who you are.
Lesson 1: “I think, therefore, I am”

One can hardly answer the question


“Who am I?” without going through
some sort of introspection. The very
act of thinking is in itself the beginning
of knowing oneself.
As lovers of wisdom,
philosophers value nothing
more than knowing the truth. It
is this premium placed not just
on any sort of knowledge, but
on true knowledge that makes
philosophy so rigorous—for
there are many things that we
can know, but not everything is
true.
However, is not the time to dive into politics or in
any sort of pressing issues. Rather, our goal here
is to know more about ourselves, and that alone is
difficult enough. It is hard to pinpoint any single
characteristic or quality that could fully describe
who you are. But before you even attempt to do
so, it is important to consider if these things are
actually true, if they’re really reflective of who you
are. Can I really call myself pretty? Handsome?
Am I really as smart and clever as I think I am?
Are the things I believe in actually true?
René Descartes

The seventeenth century


French philosopher.

Known as the Father of


Modern Philosophy.
Like many of us, Descartes, as he grew up, realized that
many of the things he held to be true in the past were, in
fact, false.
Descartes was disturbed by similar revelations and, he
wondered, if there were other things he believed in that
actually turned out to be wrong or faulty. And so, he began
this process of skepticism or doubt, known philosophically
as Cartesian doubt, whereby he systematically and
methodically disbelieved everything until he could get at a
point of which there was absolutely no doubt. In effect,
Descartes set out to examine his beliefs carefully. He did so
one by one, only accepting the beliefs that he couldn’t doubt
to be true.
If our senses failed us in the past, then, for
Descartes, it becomes much harder to trust
them. This is what he coined as the Causal
Theory. How are we to know that they are telling
us the truth? He goes one step further in his
process of methodic doubt and proposes the
idea that everything we know, everything we
perceive with our senses, could all really be just
an illusion created by some sort of evil genius.
Descartes suggested that everything we know about
the world and about ourselves is really just the creation
of this evil genius, whose purpose is to deceive us, as if
we were in a dream.

Despite the situation, Descartes doesn’t despair. He arrives at his aha!


or eureka moment: He could be deceived by his senses and by an evil
genius, but he could not doubt the fact that he was doubting. It was
with this realization that he gave philosophy one of its most famous
lines: Cogito, ergo sum or I think, therefore, I am. He could doubt and
deny the existence of everything, but he couldn’t doubt that he was
doubting, and with this thought, he started to build his beliefs from the
ground up, with this realization of himself as a thinking being as the
starting point.
When philosophizing about the
self, it would do us well to exert
the same effort and desire that
Descartes did. What are the things
about yourself which you can
really be sure are true?
In our desire to know more about
ourselves and how we relate to the
world, it is important to keep in mind
that our search for answers should be
grounded in truth. We would do not
only ourselves, but everyone else a PHILOSOPHY
disservice if we based who we are on
qualities or characteristics that are not
APPLIED
really true. Just like Descartes, we
owe it to ourselves to be as honest as
possible in our journey of self-
discovery.

You might also like