At the heart of philosophizing about the human person is the desire and the attempt to answer the question “Who am I?”. Philosophy in our world
There’s an old saying that
goes: Tell me who your friends are, and I’ll tell you who you are. Lesson 1: “I think, therefore, I am”
One can hardly answer the question
“Who am I?” without going through some sort of introspection. The very act of thinking is in itself the beginning of knowing oneself. As lovers of wisdom, philosophers value nothing more than knowing the truth. It is this premium placed not just on any sort of knowledge, but on true knowledge that makes philosophy so rigorous—for there are many things that we can know, but not everything is true. However, is not the time to dive into politics or in any sort of pressing issues. Rather, our goal here is to know more about ourselves, and that alone is difficult enough. It is hard to pinpoint any single characteristic or quality that could fully describe who you are. But before you even attempt to do so, it is important to consider if these things are actually true, if they’re really reflective of who you are. Can I really call myself pretty? Handsome? Am I really as smart and clever as I think I am? Are the things I believe in actually true? René Descartes
The seventeenth century
French philosopher.
Known as the Father of
Modern Philosophy. Like many of us, Descartes, as he grew up, realized that many of the things he held to be true in the past were, in fact, false. Descartes was disturbed by similar revelations and, he wondered, if there were other things he believed in that actually turned out to be wrong or faulty. And so, he began this process of skepticism or doubt, known philosophically as Cartesian doubt, whereby he systematically and methodically disbelieved everything until he could get at a point of which there was absolutely no doubt. In effect, Descartes set out to examine his beliefs carefully. He did so one by one, only accepting the beliefs that he couldn’t doubt to be true. If our senses failed us in the past, then, for Descartes, it becomes much harder to trust them. This is what he coined as the Causal Theory. How are we to know that they are telling us the truth? He goes one step further in his process of methodic doubt and proposes the idea that everything we know, everything we perceive with our senses, could all really be just an illusion created by some sort of evil genius. Descartes suggested that everything we know about the world and about ourselves is really just the creation of this evil genius, whose purpose is to deceive us, as if we were in a dream.
Despite the situation, Descartes doesn’t despair. He arrives at his aha!
or eureka moment: He could be deceived by his senses and by an evil genius, but he could not doubt the fact that he was doubting. It was with this realization that he gave philosophy one of its most famous lines: Cogito, ergo sum or I think, therefore, I am. He could doubt and deny the existence of everything, but he couldn’t doubt that he was doubting, and with this thought, he started to build his beliefs from the ground up, with this realization of himself as a thinking being as the starting point. When philosophizing about the self, it would do us well to exert the same effort and desire that Descartes did. What are the things about yourself which you can really be sure are true? In our desire to know more about ourselves and how we relate to the world, it is important to keep in mind that our search for answers should be grounded in truth. We would do not only ourselves, but everyone else a PHILOSOPHY disservice if we based who we are on qualities or characteristics that are not APPLIED really true. Just like Descartes, we owe it to ourselves to be as honest as possible in our journey of self- discovery.