www.ijcrt.

org © 2023 IJCRT | Volume 11, Issue 9 September 2023 | ISSN: 2320-2882

THE NEHRUVIAN ERA AND ITS FOREIGN

POLICY:
A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS

PRIYA SHARMA

Abstract: The Nehruvian Era, a pivotal phase in India's history from 1947 to 1964, marked by the
leadership of Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, is renowned for its distinctive foreign policy approach. This
abstract offers a comprehensive analysis of the Nehruvian foreign policy paradigm, delving into its
fundamental tenets, objectives, and its consequential impact on India's global positioning.Nehru's foreign
policy was characterized by several core principles, including non-alignment, peaceful coexistence, and
solidarity among the emerging Third World nations. This paper critically examines the formulation and
execution of these principles in the face of complex international dynamics. It delves into the multifaceted
dimensions of Nehru's diplomatic strategy, dissecting its successes, setbacks, and underlying ideological
underpinnings.
Central to this analysis is the exploration of key events and challenges, notably the Sino-Indian border
conflict and the intricate Indo-Pak relations. By closely scrutinizing Nehru's handling of these pivotal
moments, the paper assesses the pragmatic and ideological considerations that shaped his decisions, and
subsequently, their ramifications on India's global stature.
Furthermore, the paper evaluates India's participation in international forums and institutions under Nehru's
leadership, offering insights into the nation's active role in shaping global narratives and policies. Drawing
from an array of historical records, primary sources, and scholarly interpretations, this abstract illuminates
the intricate tapestry of the Nehruvian foreign policy doctrine.
In summation, this analysis advances a nuanced understanding of the Nehruvian Era's foreign policy,
shedding light on its enduring significance in shaping India's diplomatic identity and its role in the
international arena.

Index Terms - Nehruvian Era , Foreign Policy , Panchsheel Principle, Third World ,Geopolitics ,
Contemporary Relevance.

IJCRT2309338 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org c893

www.ijcrt.org © 2023 IJCRT | Volume 11, Issue 9 September 2023 | ISSN: 2320-2882

1. INTRODUCTION
The Nehruvian Era stands as a significant chapter in India's post-independence history, characterized not
only by its nation-building efforts but also by its distinctive foreign policy approach. As the first Prime
Minister of independent India, Jawaharlal Nehru played a pivotal role in shaping the country's foreign
relations, crafting a diplomatic strategy that continues to influence India's global interactions to this day. This
introduction sets the stage for a comprehensive analysis of the Nehruvian Era's foreign policy, delving into its
core principles, objectives, challenges, and lasting impact on India's international standing.
Jawaharlal Nehru's foreign policy approach was marked by a unique blend of idealism and pragmatism. His
vision extended beyond the immediate concerns of the newly formed nation, encompassing a larger
aspiration for global peace, cooperation, and equitable development. The principles of non-alignment,
peaceful coexistence, and solidarity with other developing nations formed the cornerstone of Nehru's
diplomatic philosophy. By steering clear of alignment with either of the Cold War blocs, Nehru aimed to
maintain India's sovereignty, safeguard its national interests, and promote a multilateral world order.

This era witnessed India's emergence as a vocal advocate for decolonization, self-determination, and the
rights of smaller nations on the international stage. Nehru's leadership guided India's participation in global
forums such as the United Nations, where he passionately championed issues of social justice, human rights,
and disarmament. His commitment to these principles, often referred to as the "Nehruvian idealism," left an
indelible mark on India's foreign policy trajectory.
In the pages that follow, we delve into a comprehensive analysis of the Nehruvian foreign policy era. By
examining the core principles that guided Nehru's approach, evaluating its implementation in the face of
complex challenges, and assessing its influence on India's global positioning, this study contributes to a
deeper understanding of the significance and legacy of the Nehruvian Era in shaping India's role in the
international arena.
The Nehruvian Era stands as an indelible chapter in India's history, defined by the visionary leadership of
Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. Spanning the years from 1947 to 1964, this period was marked by a
distinctive approach to foreign policy that left an indelible mark on India's global trajectory. Nehru's foreign
policy, characterized by principles of non-alignment, peaceful coexistence, and solidarity with the Third
World, was both a reflection of his ideological convictions and a response to the complex geopolitical
landscape of the time.
This era witnessed India's emergence from colonial subjugation into an independent nation determined to
carve its identity on the world stage. Nehru's foreign policy choices, often guided by a delicate balance of
pragmatism and idealism, were instrumental in shaping India's interactions with both superpowers and newly
emerging nations. From navigating the challenges of the Cold War to addressing regional conflicts and
promoting decolonization, Nehru's diplomatic decisions had far-reaching implications for the nation.

IJCRT2309338 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org c894

www.ijcrt.org © 2023 IJCRT | Volume 11, Issue 9 September 2023 | ISSN: 2320-2882

This paper embarks on a comprehensive analysis of the Nehruvian Era's foreign policy, dissecting its key
principles, objectives, and outcomes. By delving into the intricacies of Nehru's approach, the paper aims to
uncover the underlying motivations that drove his diplomatic endeavors. It also seeks to evaluate the legacy
of this era, examining its impact on India's contemporary foreign policy strategies and its enduring influence
on the nation's global engagements.
As the world continues to grapple with shifting alliances, power dynamics, and evolving global challenges, a
retrospective examination of the Nehruvian Era's foreign policy offers valuable insights into the complexities
of statecraft and the enduring quest for sovereignty and relevance in an interconnected world.

2. NEHRU’S VISION FOR FOREIGN POLICY

Jawaharlal Nehru's vision for foreign policy during the Nehruvian Era was guided by a set of principles and
objectives that aimed to secure India's sovereignty, promote peace, and advance the nation's interests on the
global stage. Key aspects of Nehru's vision included:

2.1. Non-Alignment: Nehru championed the policy of non-alignment, advocating for India to maintain
independence from both the Western and Eastern power blocs of the Cold War. This approach aimed to
safeguard India's autonomy, prevent alignment with any military alliance, and enable the nation to pursue its
own interests without being drawn into conflicts.

2.2. Peaceful Coexistence: Nehru believed in peaceful coexistence among nations, emphasizing diplomacy,
negotiation, and dialogue to resolve international disputes. He sought to establish amicable relations with
other countries, even in the face of ideological differences.

2.3. Third World Solidarity: Nehru's foreign policy aimed to foster solidarity among newly independent
nations of the Third World. He believed in the importance of collective action to address common challenges,
such as economic underdevelopment and colonial legacies.

2.4. Promotion of Decolonization: Nehru was a vocal advocate for decolonization and supported the
independence struggles of various nations. He viewed colonialism as a grave injustice and called for an end
to imperialist rule around the world.

2.5. Support for Internationalism: Nehru valued India's engagement with international organizations like
the United Nations. He believed in the potential of these institutions to facilitate cooperation, uphold global
peace, and address issues such as poverty, health, and education.

2.6. Economic Self-Reliance: Nehru's foreign policy also extended to economic matters. He aimed to
strengthen India's economic self-reliance by promoting industrialization, technological development, and
trade diversification.

2.7. Asian Identity: Nehru emphasized India's identity as an Asian nation and sought to enhance ties with
other Asian countries. He envisioned a united and cooperative Asia that could play a significant role in global
affairs.

2.8. Peaceful Resolution of Conflicts: Nehru advocated for the resolution of conflicts through peaceful
means and negotiations. He believed that war and aggression should be avoided whenever possible.

Nehru's foreign policy vision was shaped by a blend of idealism and pragmatism, reflecting his deep
commitment to India's national interests, sovereignty, and the pursuit of global peace. While his approach
faced challenges and criticisms, his legacy in shaping India's diplomatic identity and contributing to the
international discourse remains enduring

IJCRT2309338 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org c895

www.ijcrt.org © 2023 IJCRT | Volume 11, Issue 9 September 2023 | ISSN: 2320-2882

3. NON-ALIGNMENT AND GLOBAL POLITICS

Non-alignment was a foreign policy strategy that gained prominence during the Cold War era and had a
significant impact on global politics. The concept of non-alignment revolved around countries not aligning
themselves with either of the two major power blocs, led by the United States and the Soviet Union, thereby
maintaining their independence and sovereignty. This strategy had several implications for global politics:

3.1. Balance of Power: Non-alignment contributed to maintaining a delicate balance of power during the
Cold War. By refusing to align with either superpower, non-aligned nations acted as a check against the
excessive dominance of either bloc, preventing a complete bipolar world order.
3.2. Reducing Tensions: Non-aligned countries, by avoiding military alliances with either side, helped
reduce tensions between the superpowers. This was especially important during times of heightened nuclear
arms race and potential conflict, as non-aligned nations advocated for diplomacy and disarmament.
3.3.Diplomatic Leverage: Non-alignment allowed countries to engage with both superpowers and other
nations without being tied down by ideological commitments. This gave them greater flexibility in pursuing
their national interests and brokering diplomatic solutions to regional conflicts.
3.4. Third World Solidarity: Non-aligned nations often came from the developing world, and the
movement fostered solidarity among these countries. By advocating for their collective interests, non-aligned
nations worked towards economic development, social justice, and the end of colonialism.
3.5. Mediation and Conflict Resolution: Non-aligned nations were often seen as neutral parties that could
mediate conflicts between the superpowers or in regional disputes. This mediation role enhanced their
diplomatic status and influence.
3.6. Global South's Voice: Non-alignment amplified the voice of the Global South on the global stage.
These countries had historically been marginalized, and non-alignment provided them with a platform to
articulate their concerns and aspirations.
3.7. Contributing to International Organizations: Non-aligned countries often played a significant role in
international organizations like the United Nations. Their stance on issues like disarmament, decolonization,
and development had a lasting impact on the global agenda.

3.8. Regional Stability: Non-alignment could contribute to regional stability by avoiding entanglements in
the conflicts of major powers. This allowed nations to focus on their own development and cooperation
within their regions.
While the influence of the Cold War has waned, the principles of non-alignment continue to resonate in
contemporary global politics. Many countries still adopt policies that prioritize independence, neutrality, and
a commitment to peaceful coexistence as they navigate complex international dynamics.

4. PANCHSHEEL PRINCIPLE
The Panchsheel principles, also known as the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence, are a set of
principles that were jointly formulated by India and China in the 1950s. These principles served as a
framework for diplomatic relations and cooperation between the two countries and have also been widely
recognized as guiding principles for international relations. The Panchsheel principles are as follows:

4.1. Mutual Respect for Each Other's Territorial Integrity and Sovereignty: This principle emphasizes
the importance of recognizing and respecting the territorial boundaries of each nation and refraining from
any actions that could infringe upon another country's sovereignty.

4.2. Mutual Non-Aggression: This principle highlights the commitment to refrain from the use of force or
aggression against each other. It promotes peaceful resolution of disputes and conflicts through dialogue and
negotiation.

4.3. Mutual Non-Interference in Each Other's Internal Affairs: According to this principle, nations
should respect the sovereignty of other countries by refraining from intervening in their internal political,
social, and economic matters.
IJCRT2309338 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org c896
www.ijcrt.org © 2023 IJCRT | Volume 11, Issue 9 September 2023 | ISSN: 2320-2882

4.4. Equality and Mutual Benefit: This principle underscores the importance of treating each other as
equals and seeking cooperation that brings mutual benefits. It emphasizes the significance of fair and
balanced relations.

4.5. Peaceful Coexistence: This principle advocates for peaceful relations among nations, encouraging the
resolution of conflicts through diplomatic means, dialogue, and negotiations. It calls for the absence of
hostility and confrontation.

The Panchsheel principles were initially put forward in the context of India-China relations, but they were
also embraced by other nations as a broader framework for international interactions. While the principles
were originally intended to promote peaceful coexistence and cooperation, their practical application has
faced challenges in various contexts, including the Sino-Indian border conflict and other geopolitical
dynamics.

Despite these challenges, the Panchsheel principles remain significant as a representation of diplomatic
aspirations for peaceful relations and cooperation among nations. They reflect the desire to create a world
order characterized by respect, non-aggression, and mutual benefit, even as the complexities of global
politics continue to evolve.

5. ROLE IN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

During the Nehruvian era, India played an active role in international organizations, reflecting its
commitment to global cooperation, peace, and the promotion of decolonization. Jawaharlal Nehru's
leadership saw India engaging with various international forums to advance its foreign policy objectives and
contribute to shaping the global agenda. Here are some ways India's role manifested in international
organizations during that time:

5.1. United Nations (UN): India was a founding member of the United Nations and played an instrumental
role in the organization's early years. Nehru's speeches in the UN emphasized the importance of peaceful
coexistence, decolonization, and the rights of newly independent nations. India's diplomats were actively
involved in UN committees, contributing to discussions on issues such as disarmament, human rights, and
development.

5.2. Non-Aligned Movement (NAM): While not a traditional international organization, the Non-Aligned
Movement was a significant initiative during the Nehruvian era. India, under Nehru's leadership, was one of
the principal architects of NAM. The movement aimed to provide a platform for countries that did not align
with either the Western or Eastern blocs during the Cold War. It allowed India to exert influence on global
affairs by advocating for peace, anti-colonialism, and cooperation among developing nations.

5.3. Commonwealth of Nations: As a former British colony, India became a member of the
Commonwealth after gaining independence. Nehru used this platform to foster ties with other
Commonwealth nations, promote cooperation, and address common challenges such as economic
development and cultural exchange.

5.4. Asian Relations: Nehru emphasized India's role in fostering cooperation and unity among Asian
nations. India was a founding member of the Asian Relations Conference held in 1947, which aimed to
promote discussions on issues of common concern among Asian countries.

5.5. International Economic Organizations: India also participated in international economic

organizations such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. These engagements
allowed India to seek financial assistance for development projects and contribute to discussions on global
economic policies.

5.6. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO): India's engagement
with UNESCO reflected its commitment to education, culture, and scientific cooperation. India was active
in UNESCO's efforts to promote cultural heritage preservation and scientific research.

IJCRT2309338 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org c897

www.ijcrt.org © 2023 IJCRT | Volume 11, Issue 9 September 2023 | ISSN: 2320-2882

5.7. Global Initiatives: India supported global initiatives such as the Bandung Conference in 1955, which
brought together newly independent nations from Asia and Africa to discuss common challenges and
aspirations. The conference marked an important moment in the promotion of international solidarity among
developing countries.

India's involvement in these international organizations during the Nehruvian era showcased its aspiration to
play a constructive role in shaping global norms, promoting peace, advocating for decolonization, and
contributing to the development and progress of nations around the world.

6. CHALLENGES AND CRITICISMS

The Nehruvian era and its foreign policy faced both challenges and criticisms, reflecting the complexities of
navigating a rapidly changing global landscape and pursuing a unique diplomatic approach. Some of the
challenges and criticisms include:

6.1. Sino-Indian Border Conflict: One of the most significant challenges was the Sino-Indian border
conflict in 1962. Despite Nehru's efforts to maintain friendly relations with China, the conflict highlighted
the limitations of India's non-alignment policy and its vulnerability to geopolitical realities.

6.2. Limited Influence in Global Conflicts: Critics argued that India's non-alignment stance sometimes
limited its ability to take a clear and effective stance in certain global conflicts. Being neutral could be
interpreted as lacking commitment or influence in addressing pressing issues.

6.3. Dependency on Aid: India's non-aligned status often led to a delicate balancing act between receiving
aid from both superpower blocs. This, at times, raised concerns about whether such aid came with strings
attached or compromised India's independence.

6.4. Domestic Concerns vs. Global Engagement: Some critics felt that Nehru's focus on international
affairs might have diverted attention and resources away from pressing domestic issues, particularly
economic development and poverty alleviation.

6.5. Limited Regional Cooperation: Despite advocating for Third World solidarity, India's engagement
with its South Asian neighbors faced challenges. Relations with Pakistan remained strained, and efforts to
foster regional cooperation sometimes encountered roadblocks.

6.6. Ideological Constraints: While non-alignment was a pragmatic strategy, it sometimes faced criticism
for appearing ideologically driven, potentially leading to missed opportunities for strategic partnerships.

6.7. Lack of Clear Alternatives: Critics argued that non-alignment, while offering independence, didn't
always provide a clear alternative path for navigating complex geopolitical scenarios. This made it
challenging to develop a comprehensive foreign policy strategy.

6.8. Impact on Defense Preparedness: The focus on peaceful coexistence and disarmament sometimes led
to concerns about India's defense preparedness in an increasingly competitive and militarized world.

6.9. Influence of Superpowers: Some questioned the extent to which India's non-alignment was truly
independent, as both superpowers sought to exert influence and leverage India's strategic location for their
own purposes.

6.10. Decolonization Challenges: While Nehru championed decolonization, critics argued that India's
support for certain national liberation movements might have been inconsistent or influenced by political
considerations.

6.11. Legacy of Idealism: Some critics viewed Nehru's idealism as overly optimistic, suggesting that it
might have prevented him from fully grasping the harsh realities of power politics and international
rivalries.
IJCRT2309338 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org c898
www.ijcrt.org © 2023 IJCRT | Volume 11, Issue 9 September 2023 | ISSN: 2320-2882

It's important to note that these challenges and criticisms must be considered in the context of the era's
complexities, the global geopolitical landscape of the time, and the unique challenges faced by a newly
independent nation striving to carve out its place in the world.

7. LEGACY AND CONTEMPORARY RELEVENCE

The legacy of the Nehruvian era's foreign policy continues to have lasting impacts and holds contemporary
relevance in several ways:

7.1. Non-Alignment and Neutrality: The principle of non-alignment and neutrality remains relevant in
today's world of complex geopolitics. Countries often seek to balance their relationships without aligning
with specific power blocs, maintaining flexibility in international relations.

7.2. Third World Solidarity: The emphasis on solidarity among developing nations still resonates in global
politics. Many countries advocate for collective action to address shared challenges, particularly in
international forums and organizations.

7.3. Advocacy for Peaceful Coexistence: The promotion of peaceful coexistence, conflict resolution
through dialogue, and disarmament aligns with contemporary efforts to prevent conflicts and promote global
stability.

7.4. Multilateral Diplomacy: Nehru's engagement with international organizations underscores the
importance of multilateral diplomacy in addressing global challenges such as climate change, terrorism, and
public health crises.

7.5. Independent Foreign Policy: The legacy of pursuing an independent foreign policy despite pressures
from superpowers reflects the importance of safeguarding national interests and sovereignty in a multipolar
world.

7.6. Asian Identity: Nehru's focus on strengthening ties within Asia remains relevant in the context of
Asia's growing influence in global affairs and the potential for intra-regional cooperation.

7.7. Principles of Sovereignty: The emphasis on mutual respect for territorial integrity and non-
interference in internal affairs is a reminder of the significance of respecting national sovereignty in an
interconnected world.

7.8. Pursuit of Global Peace: The commitment to global peace, cooperation, and conflict prevention is a
timeless aspiration that resonates with efforts to address contemporary global challenges.

7.9. Developing World Perspectives: The Nehruvian era highlighted the importance of considering the
perspectives and needs of the developing world in shaping international policies.

7.10. Moral Leadership: Nehru's emphasis on ethical foreign policy and moral leadership continues to
inspire discussions about the role of values and principles in international relations.

While the world has evolved since the Nehruvian era, the core principles of the era's foreign policy provide
valuable insights for addressing current global issues. As nations continue to grapple with shifting alliances,
emerging threats, and the quest for peace and stability, the Nehruvian legacy offers a foundation for
principled and pragmatic diplomacy.

8. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Here is a table summarizing the comparative analysis between the Nehruvian Era and Contemporary
Global dynamics.

IJCRT2309338 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org c899

www.ijcrt.org © 2023 IJCRT | Volume 11, Issue 9 September 2023 | ISSN: 2320-2882

Table.1

ASPECTS NEHRUVIAN ERA CONTEMPORARY

GLOBAL DYNAMICS
1. Non – Alignment vs. Nehru's non-alignment focused on Today, countries often engage
Multilateralism staying neutral in the Cold War in multilateralism to address
superpower rivalry. global issues, forming alliances
and partnerships for specific
goals.
2. Peaceful Coexistence vs. Nehru emphasized peaceful Contemporary geopolitics
Security Concerns coexistence, advocating for includes security concerns,
diplomacy over conflict. such as cybersecurity,
terrorism, and regional
conflicts, that challenge
peaceful coexistence.
3. Third World Solidarity vs. Nehru championed Third World Now, emerging powers like
Emerging Powers solidarity against colonialism. China and India play key roles,
often pursuing national
interests alongside global
responsibilities.
4. Global South's Voice vs. Nehru's focus was on Today, human rights issues
Human Rights Focus decolonization and Global South and global advocacy
representation. campaigns are at the forefront.
5. Economic Self-Reliance vs. Nehru emphasized economic self- Current global dynamics
Global Trade reliance to reduce dependency. involve interconnected
economies and international
trade agreements.
6. Sovereignty vs. International Nehru prioritized sovereignty and Modern challenges often
Cooperation non-interference. require international
cooperation to address issues
like climate change,
pandemics, and cyber threats.
7. Regional Cooperation vs. Nehru aimed for regional Modern dynamics include
Bilateral Relations cooperation within Asia. bilateral relations, regional
organizations, and cross-border
challenges.
8. Moral Leadership vs. Power Nehru's moral leadership and Contemporary politics involves
Politics ethical foreign policy were central. a mix of moral considerations
and realpolitik approaches.
9. . Neutrality vs. Strategic Nehru sought neutrality to avoid Today, strategic partnerships
Partnerships entanglement in superpower are pursued to enhance
conflicts. economic growth, security, and
influence.
10. Global Institutions' Role vs. Nehru emphasized global Contemporary challenges
New Challenges institutions like the UN for conflict demand adapting global
resolution. institutions to address
emerging threats like
cybersecurity and digital
governance.

In summary, while there are differences between the Nehruvian era and contemporary global dynamics,
there are also enduring principles that continue to influence diplomatic strategies. The Nehruvian legacy of
non-alignment, peaceful coexistence, and promoting the Global South's interests still informs discussions on
sovereignty, multilateralism, and moral leadership in international relations.

IJCRT2309338 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org c900

www.ijcrt.org © 2023 IJCRT | Volume 11, Issue 9 September 2023 | ISSN: 2320-2882

9. CONCLUSION
The Nehruvian era's foreign policy represents a distinctive chapter in India's history that continues to
resonate with contemporary global dynamics. Jawaharlal Nehru's visionary approach of non-alignment,
peaceful coexistence, and solidarity with the Third World left a lasting legacy that has relevance in the
complex world of today.

While the world has evolved since Nehru's time, the core principles of his foreign policy still offer valuable
insights. The emphasis on neutrality, sovereignty, and ethical diplomacy remains a reminder of the
importance of safeguarding national interests and maintaining independence in an interconnected world. The
pursuit of peaceful coexistence, conflict resolution through dialogue, and disarmament speaks to the
universal aspiration for global stability and harmony.

In a world characterized by shifting alliances, emerging powers, and complex challenges, the Nehruvian
era's emphasis on unity among developing nations and the importance of a moral compass in international
relations remains pertinent. As nations navigate the intricacies of modern geopolitics, they can draw from
Nehru's legacy to strike a balance between pragmatism and idealism, forging partnerships that advance both
their interests and the broader goals of peace, cooperation, and sustainable development.

The Nehruvian era serves as a reminder that foreign policy is not just a strategic pursuit but also a reflection
of a nation's values, aspirations, and commitment to global welfare. As we confront 21st-century challenges,
the Nehruvian principles continue to inspire nations to forge a path that upholds independence, mutual
respect, and the collective pursuit of a better world.

REFERENCES
[1]Frank.M., 2007 ,Jawaharlal Nehru, Jaico Publishing House.
[2]Chakrabarty.B.,1992,Jawaharlal Nehru and Planning 1938-41: India at the Crossroad,26(2),275-287,
Modern Studies.
[3] Paul.F. 1964, Indian Foreign Policy:The age of Nehru. The Review of Politics 26(2), 257-286.
[4] Harsh.R. ,2007, India’s Foreign Policy Under Nehru and its Contemporary Relevance, Contemporary
Perspectives,SAGE Journals1(1),33-45.
[5] Kennedy.A.B.,2015 , Nehru Foreign Policy. The Oxford Handbook of Indian Foreign Policy 92.
[6] Singh.I.1998 . Between Two Fires: Towards An Understanding Of Jawaharlal Nehru Foreign Policy.
Orient Blackswan.
[7] Sethuraman.N. 2022. Panchsheel And Non – Alignment : Jawaharlal Nehru’s Legacies To India’s
Foreign Policy.Research Gate.
[8] Maxwell.N. 1973.Jawaharlal Nehru : Of Pride And Principle. Foreign Aff. 52,633.

IJCRT2309338 International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) www.ijcrt.org c901