Barut-Girardello coherent states for morse potential with

position-dependent mass
Daniel Sabi Takou1,2∗, Yarou Mora Assimiou2†and
Gabriel Y. H. Avossevou1‡
1
Unité de Recherche en Physique Théorique (URPT),
Institut de Mathématiques et de Sciences Physiques (IMSP),
01 B.P. 613 Porto-Novo, Rep. du Bénin
2
Ecole Polytechnique d’Abomey Calavi(EPAC-UAC),
Université d’Abomey-Calavi (UAC)

Abstract

Key words : supersymmetry(SUSY), Quantization, Hamiltonian coherent states, Pauli model.

Pacs numbers: 03.65.-w; 45.20.-d; 78.47.jh; 11.30.Pb.

1 Introduction
2 Hamiltonian CS and enhanced quantization
2.1 Construction of the Hamiltonian CS
We consider the quantum-mechanical description of position dependent effective mass (PDEM)
Hamiltonianjunker,bagchi,Gangopadhyayamallow
P2
Ĥ = + V (x, α), (1)
2m(x)
such as the ground state of the system which it describes, energy E0 is zero. In this notation
m −γ|x|


m(x) = 2 1 + e represents the variable mass of the system while P and x are the oper-
ators associated with the degree of freedom of phase space. This Hamiltonian may be written
in the form   2  
1 d 1 d
Ĥ = − − + V (x, α). (2)
2m(x) dx2 2m(x) dx
∗
Email: sabitakoud@yahoo.fr, sabitakoudaniel11@gmail.com
†
Email: sabitakoud@yahoo.fr, sabitakoudaniel11@gmail.com
‡
Email: gabriel.avossevou@imsp-uac.org, gabavossevou@gmail.com

1
with the ladders operators
!′
1 d 1 1 d
Â(α) = W (x, α) + p , and † (α) = W (x, α) − p −p , (3)
2m(x) dx 2m(x) 2m(x) dx

3 Non-relativistic charge particle in the magnetic field

1 d2 1 −γ|x| d 1
Ĥ = − −γ|x| 2
− γe + mω 2 x2 (1+) (4)
m(1 + e ) dx m dx 4

The intertwining operators introduced in (11), are given as

1 d
Â(α) = p + γ sinh(γx), (5)
m(1 + e−γ|x| ) dx

1 d 1
† (α) = p − p γe−γ|x| + γ sinh(γx) (6)
m(1 + e−γ|x| ) dx 2 m(1 + e −γ|x| )

with the super-potential is given by

W (x, γ) = γ sinh(γx) (7)

ou bien utiliser encore ceci

W (x, γ) = A + Be−γx (8)

ou bien utiliser encore ceci

1
W (x, γ) = (1 + e−γx ) (9)
2

3.1 Construction of the Hamiltonian CS for Pauli model

4 Conclusion
In this paper, we have ..........

5 Acknowledgements
Ousmane Samary Dine is warmly thanked for his fruitful discussions.

2
References
[1] John Klauder. Enhanced Quantization:The Right way to Quantize Everything, Arxiv
1702.04713v2[quant-ph] 24 May 2017.

[2] John Klauder. Enhanced Quantum Procedures that Resolve Difficult Problems, Arxiv
1206.4017 v6[Hep-th] 10 Jun 2015.

[3] Gazeau J P and Klauder J R 1999 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.32123.

[4] J. R. Klauder and B. S. Skagerstam. Coherent states, applications in physics and mathe-
matical physics. World scientific, Singapore, 1985.

[5] J.-P. Gazeau. Coherent States in Quantum Physics. Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 2009.

[6] J. R. Klauder, K. A. Penson and J.-M. Sixderniers, Constructing coherent states through
solutions of Stieljes and Hausdorff momentumum problems, Phys. Rev. A 64 (2001).

[7] Marcin Molski J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 165301 (2009).

[8] M. N. Hounkonnou, S. Arjika and E. Baloı̈tcha, Pöschl-Teller Hamiltonian: Gazeau-

Klauder type coherent states, related statistics, and geometry,J. Math. Phys.55, 123502
(2014).

[9] Hussin, V, Morales-Salgado, V S Coherent States for Supersymmetric Partners of the

Infinite Well, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 839 (2017)

[10] H. Matsueda, Solid state coherent quantum dot system for quantum computing and quan-
tum transmission, Int. J. Circ. Theor. Appl. 31 (2003)

[11] Syed Hamad Bukhari, Samia Aslam, Faiza Mustafa, Ayesha Jamil, Salman Naeem Khan,
Muhammad Ashfaq Ahmad, Entangled coherent states for quantum information process-
ing, Optik 125 (2014) 3788-3790.

[12] Eugenio E. Vogel, Manuel A. de Orúe, Juan Rivera-Iratchet, Mirta L. Flores, Application
of the method of coherent states to the optical properties of F e2+ in ZnSe, Journal of
Crystal Growth 117 (1992) 710-714.

[13] M. Joveneau and J. Govaerts, Dynamique classique en mécanique quantique : Etats

cohérents Hamiltoniens, UCL, Belgique (2012).

[14] Bergeron H and Valance A, Overcomplete basis for onedimensional Hamiltonian, 1995 J.
Math. Phys. 36 1572.

[15] J.-P. Antoine, J.-P. Gazeau, P. Monceau, J. R. Klauder, and K. A. Penson, Temporally sta-
ble coherent states for infinite well and Pöschl–Teller potentials. Journal of Mathematical
Physics, 42:2349–2387, 2001.

[16] H. Bergeron, P. Siegl, and A. Youssef, New SUSYQM coherent states for Pöschl- Teller
potentials : a detailed mathematical analysis, J. Phys. A : Math. Theor. 45 244028 (2012).

3
[17] H. Bergeron, Jean-Pierre Gazeau, Petr Siegl, Ahmed Youssef, Semi-classical behavior of
Pöschl-Teller coherent states. EPL, 92, 60003 (2010).

[18] I. Aremua, M. N. Hounkonnou and E. Baloı̈tcha, Coherent states for Landau levels: alge-
braic and thermodynamical properties, arXiv: 1301.6280.

[19] M. N. Hounkonnou and K. Sodoga, Generalized coherent states for associated hypergeo-
metric type functions, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38, 7851-7857 (2005).

[20] Bijan Bagchi, Rupamanjari Ghosh and Avinash Khare, A pedestrian introduction to co-
herent and squeezed states, International Journal of Modern Physics. 35, No. 19, 2030011
(2020).

[21] Musongela Lubo , Kikunga Kasenda Ivan , Likwolo Katamba Stanislas, Factorization,
SUSY Coherent States and Classical Trajectories,arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.01819, 2017.

[22] J. R. Klauder, Phase Space Geometry in Classical and Quantum Mechanics, arxiv
0112.011v1/[quant-ph] 02 Dec 2001.

[23] Jan Govaerts, Calvin Matondo Bwayi and Olivier Mattelaer, The Klauder–Daubechies
Construction of the Phase Space Path Integral and the Harmonic Oscillator, arxiv 0908.
0805v1 [hep-ph] 6 Aug 2009.

[24] Witten E, Dynamical breaking of supersymmetry, 1981 Nucl. Phys. B 185 513.

[25] Witten E,Constraints on supersymmetry breaking, 1982 Nucl. Phys. B 202 253.

[26] Mielnik B 1984 J. Math. Phys. 25 3387.

[27] Andrianov A A, Ioffe M V and Spiridonov V P, Factorization method and new potentials
with the oscillator spectrum, 1993 Phys. Lett. A 174 273.

[28] Andrianov A A, Ioffe M V, Cannata F and Dedonder J P, Second order derivative su-
persymmetry, q deformations and the scattering problem, 1995 Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 10
2683.

[29] Cooper F, Khare A and Sukhatme U, Supersymmetry and quantum mechanics, 1995 Phys.
Rep. 251 267.

[30] Bagrov V G and Samsonov B F,Darboux transformation of the Schrödinger equation, 1997
Phys. Part. Nucl. 28 374.

[31] Fernández D J, Glasser M L and Nieto L M, New isospectral oscillator potentials, 1998
Phys. Lett. A 240 15.

[32] Fernández D J, Hussin V and Mielnik B, A simple generation of exactly solvable anhar-
monic oscillators, 1998 Phys. Lett. A 244 309.

[33] Junker G and Roy P, Conditionally Exactly Solvable Potentials: A Supersymmetric Con-
struction Method, Ann. Phys. 270 155.

4
[34] ] Quesne C and Vansteenkiste N, Algebraic Realization of Supersymmetric Quantum Me-
chanics for Cyclic Shape Invariant Potentials, 1999 Helv. Phys. Acta 72 71.

[35] Samsonov B F, New possibilities for supersymmetry breakdown in quantum mechanics

and second-order irreducible Darboux transformations, 1999 Phys.Lett. A 263 274.

[36] Mielnik B, Nieto L M and Rosas-Ortiz O, The finite difference algorithm for higher order
supersymmetry, 2000 Phys. Lett. A 269 70.

[37] Cariñena J F, Ramos A and Fernández D J, Group Theoretical Approach to the Intertwined
Hamiltonian, 2001 Ann. Phys. 292 42.

[38] Aoyama H, Sato M and Tanaka T, N-fold supersymmetry in quantum mechanics: general
formalism, 2001 Nucl. Phys. B 619 105.

[39] Mielnik B and Rosas-Ortiz O, Factorization: little or great algorithm?, J. Phys. A: Math.
Gen. 37 10007.

[40] Carballo J M, Fernández D J, Negro J and Nieto L M, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical

and General Polynomial Heisenberg algebras, 2004 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37 10349.

[41] Fernández D J and Fernández-Garcı́a N,Higher-order supersymmetric quantum mechanics,

2005 AIP Conference Proceedings 744 236.

[42] Contreras-Astorga A and Fernández D J,Supersymmetric partners of the trigonometric

Pöschl–Teller potentials, 2008 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41 475303.

[43] Marquette I ,Superintegrability with third order integrals of motion, cubic algebras, and
supersymmetric quantum mechanics. II. Painlevé transcendent potentials, 2009 J. Math.
Phys. 50 095202.

[44] Fernández D J, Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics, 2010 AIP Conf. Proc. 1287 3.

[45] Quesne C, Higher-order susy, exactly solvable potentials, and exceptional orthogonals,
2011 Mod. Phys. Lett. A 26 1843.

[46] Bermúdez D and Fernández D J, Supersymmetric Quantum Mechanics and Painlevé IV

Equation, 2011 SIGMA 7 025.

[47] Marquette I 2012 J. Math. Phys. 53 012901.

[48] Andrianov A A and Ioffe M V, Nonlinear supersymmetric quantum mechanics: concepts

and realizations, 2012 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45 503001.

[49] Gómez-Ullate D, Grandati Y and Milson R, Rational extensions of the quantum harmonic
oscillator and exceptional Hermite polynomials, 2014 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47 015203.

[50] G. Junker, Supersymmetric methods in quantum and statistical physics, Springer (1996).

[51] A. Gangopadhyaya, J. Mallow and C. Rasinario, Supersymmetric quantum Mechanics: An

introduction, World Scientific (2017).

5
[52] L. D. Landau and I. M. Khalatnikov, “The gauge transformation of the Green function
for charged particles,” Sov. Phys. JETP 2, 69 (1956) [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 29, 89 (1955)].

[53] L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifschits, “The Classical Theory of Fields,”

[54] Daniel Sabi Takou , Gabriel Y.H. Avossevou and Basile B. Kounouhewa “SUSY partners
for spin-1/2 systems in nonrelativistic limits,” Open Phys. 13 (2015) 1, 157-169

[55] J. R. Klauder, “Coherent State Langevin Equations for Canonical Quantum Systems
With Applications to the Quantized Hall Effect,” Phys. Rev. A 29, 2036 (1984).
doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.29.2036

[56] Y. N. Srivastava and A. Widom, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 39, 285 (1984). doi:10.1007/BF02813659

[57] Y. Kluger, J. M. Eisenberg, B. Svetitsky, F. Cooper and E. Mottola, “Fermion

pair production in a strong electric field,” Phys. Rev. D 45, 4659 (1992),
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.45.4659.

[58] Q. g. Lin, “Electron - positron pair creation in vacuum by an electromagnetic field in

(3+1)-dimensions and lower dimensions,” J. Phys. G 25, 17 (1999), doi:10.1088/0954-
3899/25/1/003, [hep-th/9810037].

[59] David J Fernández, Véronique Hussin and Oscar Rosas-Ortiz,”Coherent states for Hamil-
tonians generated by supersymmetry”J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 (2007) 6491-6511,
doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/40/24/015.

[60] David J. Fernández C. and Nicolás Fernández-Garcı́a, ”Higher-order super-

symmetric quantum mechanics”, AIP Conference Proceedings 744, 236 (2004);
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1853203.

   
1 2 d αx † 1 2 d (α − λ)x
Â(α) = √ (1 + λx ) + √ , and  (α) = √ −(1 + λx ) + √
2 dx 1 + λx2 2 dx 1 + λx2
(10)

" #
1 d 1 p
Â(α) = p + √ αx m0 (1 + e−γx ) , (11)
m0 (1 + e−γx ) dx 2
" #
† 1 d 1 p γe−γx
 (α) = −p + √ αx m0 (1 + e−γx ) − p
m0 (1 + e−γx ) dx 2 2(1 + e−γx ) m0 (1 + e−γx )

Veuillez calculer Â(α)† et † Â(α)Ψ(x) puis déduire Â(α)† Ψ(x) et † Â(α)