BL Arrear Paper QP-2024 june

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

PONDICHERRY UNIVERSITY KARAIKAL CAMPUS

DEPARTEMENT OF MANAGEMENT KARAIKAL CAMPUS


M.B.A (BA)-FIRST YEAR -1ST SEMESTER – END EXAMINATION, JUNE- 2024 (ARREAR)
SUBJECT: MBAH015- BUSINESS LAW

TIME: 3.00 HOURS MAX.MARKS:60

Read the following Instructions:


1. Read the Sections Instructions and Questions Carefully and Answer
2. Answer the questions at one place

SECTION-A
(Maximum of 50 words)
Answer all the questions given below 5x3=15 Marks

1. Define contract and Quasi- contract.


2. Discuss the rights and duties of a partner.
3. Define the term goods and distinguish between condition and warranty.
4. Discuss the kinds of companies.
5. What are the objectives of COPA 1986?
SECTION-B
(Maximum of 200 words)
Answer the following questions given below 5X7=35Marks

6. (a). “All contracts are agreements but all agreements are not contracts.” Explain
OR
(b). Discuss fully the essentials of a valid contract?

7. (a).Explain about the Limited liability partnership Act ,2000?


OR
(b). Explain about the Insolvency and winding up of a company under Indian
Partnership act?

8. (a). Explain fully the principles on which the court would award damages for a breach
of contract?
OR
(b). Explain the Negotiable Instrument Act 1881 and its characteristics?
P.T.O…2

9. (a). Memorandum of Association is a charter of the company”? comment upon the


statement and explain the clauses which are included in a memorandum of
association of a company?
OR
(b).What are the various kinds of meetings that can be held by a company and of
the nature of business that can be transacted in each meeting?

10. (a). Define COPA and explain the redresal machinery under the COPA 1986?
OR
(b). Explain about the GST Act 2017 and Competition Act 2002?
SECTION-C (10 Marks)
(Maximum of 300 words)
Case Study Compulsory

11. The buyer was a proprietary concerned and registered as small scale industry
with the Director of Industries, Maharashtra. It placed an order with the PSG
Industrial Institute for the supply of a machine. A defective machine was supplied.
The buyer brought these defects to the notice of its supplier, but the machine was
not repaired satisfactorily.
The buyer lodged a complaint before the Maharashtra Consumer Dispute
Redressal commission claiming Rs 4 lakhs as a compensation for
financial losses. The supplier immediately raid an objection that since the
appellant has purchased the machine for commercial purpose he was not a
consumer covered by section 2(1)(d) of COPA . As the defective machinery
valued at Rs 21 Lakhs was purchased for a commercial purpose, the buyer was
denied benefits under COPA.
Aggrieved by this order, the buyer approached the Supreme Court.
Analysis the case as per the consumer protection act the Grievance redresal
mechanism and say whether the buyer got the justice

-0-

You might also like