tingari
tingari
tingari
BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY
In
by
CERTIFICATE
I humbly express my thanks to our Principal Dr. K. Appa Rao for extending
his support and for providing us with an environment to complete our project
successfully.
I would also like to thank our Vice Principal, Dr. B. Ramesh Reddy for
encouraging us which certainly helped to complete the project in time.
I would like to express my heart full thanks to our parents for their unflinching
support and constant encouragement throughout the period of our project work for
making it a successful one.
I would like to thank all the teaching and non-teaching staff members of
Electronics and Communication Engineering who have extended their full co-
operation during the course of our project.
i
4.20 Representing the frequency sweep 30
4.21 Representing the validation check 31
4.22 Representing the message manager 31
4.23 Representing the S11 plot 32
4.24 Representing the VSWR plot 32
5.1 Representing the iteration-1 structure 33
5.2 Representing the properties of substrate with
Material FR4 EPOXY 34
5.3 Representing the S11 and VSWR
plots of iteration-1 FR4 EPOXY 34
5.4 Representing the properties of substrate with
Material Gallium Arsenide 35
5.5 Representing S11 and VSWR plots for
Gallium Arsenide Substrate 36
5.6 Representing the S11 and VSWR plots for
Rogers RT/Duriod 5880(tm) Substrate 36
5.7 Representing the S11 plots for three substrate 37
5.8 Representing the VSWR plots for three
Different substrate 37
5.9 Representing the Substrate with material
Rogers RT/Duroid 5880(tm) 38
5.10 Representing the S11 and VSWR plots for
Rogers RT/Duroid 5880(tm) 39
5.11 Representing the structure along 40
with the properties of substrate with
material FR-4 Epoxy
5.12 Representing the S11 and VSWR 41
plots for FR-4 Epoxy substrate
5.13 Representing the structure along 42
with the properties of substrate with
Gallium arsenide material
5.14 Representing the S11 and VSWR 43
Waveforms for Gallium arsenide substrate
5.15 Representing the S11 plots for three Substrate 43
5.16 Representing the VSWR plots for three 43
Different Substrate
ii
List of Tables
Table No Table Name Page No
1.1 Representing various substrates 2
1.2 Representing the characteristics of 5
different Feeding techniques
3.1 Representing the dimensions of the 15
Antenna
5.1 Representing the parametric variations 44
iii
Abstract
A sharply rejected dual notch band UWB monopole antenna is presented in this paper. The
proposed antenna consists of maple leaf shaped radiating element, a 50 Ω microstrip feed
line and truncated ground plane. The proposed antenna shows the UWB operation in the
frequency range (1.7 GHz–11.1 GHz) with VSWR < 2 except the notch bands and two band
notches centered at 4.3 GHz and 7.7 GHz. The band notches are achieved by introducing a
meandered slot in the radiating element and U-shaped slot in feed line. The substrate used
for designing of UWB antenna is low loss Rogers 5880 having relative permittivity of 2.2.
The novelty of the proposed antenna is its shape and ability to support UWB bandwidth
requirements, and it also rejects two bands to avoid possible interference with existing
communication system. Good agreement between the simulated and measured results is
observed. The proposed antenna has good gain and efficiency at pass bands.
iv
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Page 1 of 53
metal layer attached to the opposite site of the substrate which creates a ground
plane. Microstrip patch antenna is made of three materials as shown in figure.1.1.
They are 1) ground 2) patch 3) substrate
1.3 SUBSTRATES
The usage of substrate is principally needed in microstrip antennas for the
mechanical support of the antenna. In order to support stability substrate should
consist of a dielectric material which effects the electrical performance of the
antenna and transmission line [29] .
Page 2 of 53
Dielectric Substrate: FR-4 (high loss, low gain antenna, cheap, easy availability); low
loss and low permittivity (RT Duroid 6002, PTFE, high gain antennas); portable n
mobile (RO4730, high performance, low weight, low permittivity, low loss, low
distortion); ceramic (Rogers RO 3200, low cost, GPS patch antenna) etc. Dielectrics
are used for improved mechanical and electrical stability. They are utilized to
decrease the size of the antenna (higher permittivity, lower size) and can assist with
creating displacement current which produces time changing Magnetic Field (by
Ampere's Law). This can thus deliver time differing Electric Field (by Faraday's law)
and a propagating EM field is created. Thus, a substrate can improve antenna's
radiation capacity.
Page 3 of 53
1.4.1 Microstrip line feed
In this feeding technique, a conducting strip is directly connected to the edge
of the patch as shown in figure 1.3(A). This type of feed also called Offset
Microstrip line feed (contacting scheme). The advantage is that the feed can be
etched on the same substrate to provide a planar structure. It provides ease of
fabrication, impedance matching.
1.4.2 Co-axial feed
The most common feeding technique used for microstrip antennas is Coaxial
feed (or probe feed). An inner conductor of co-axial connector extends
through the dielectric substrate and is soldered or attached to the radiating
patch and the outer conductor is connected to the ground plane as shown in
figure 1.3(B). The advantage of probe feed is that the feed can be placed at
any desired position to provide impedance matching.
1.4.3 Aperture coupling
Aperture coupled feed is an indirect method of feeding the patch (non-
contacting scheme) shown in figure 1.3(C). It couples the patch antenna with
microstrip line through an aperture and creates an electric filed in the aperture
which induces surface currents on the patch. The disadvantage of this
technique is that difficult to fabricate because of having multiple layers, also
increases the thickness of the antenna.
1.4.4 Proximity coupling
This feeding technique also called as electro-magnetic coupling scheme. In
this feeding, two substrate materials are used so that the feed line is given in
between those two substrates and the patch is on top of the upper substrate
material shown in figure 1.3(D). Here, also the thickness of antenna increases.
Page 4 of 53
Table 1.2 Representing characteristics of different feeding techniques
Page 5 of 53
Radiating mechanism is of two types
1. single wire 2.two wire
1. Single-wire: radiation in an antenna occurs if the wire is curved,
discontinuous, bent and terminated and when the charge is oscillating in time-
domain, it radiates even the wire is straight. Different wire configurations for
single wired antenna radiation are
(i) Curved wire: helical antenna and loop antennas comes under this category
these type of antennas are used for high frequency portable transceivers which are
used in ultra-wide band communications.
(ii) Bent wire: The radiation takes place more efficiently when the wire is bent,
either it may be single end or at both the ends of the wire because the flow of
transmitted energy tries to escape from the transmission line.
(iii) Discontinuous wire: The flow of transmission of energy is very high when
the wave is transmitting from one boundary to another, this discontinuity in the
medium is called as discontinuous wire.
Page 6 of 53
(iv) Terminated wire: the perfect termination in an antenna occurs when the
wire is properly terminated, this type of wired antennas can work even in noisy-
environment without any tuners.
Page 7 of 53
Typical uses include:
• Package Displaying – Flip-Chip, QFP, BGA
• PCB Load up Displaying – Power or Ground planes, Work Network
Grounds, Back planes. Silicon/GaAs-Winding Inductors, Transformers.
• Connectors – Cajole, XFP/SFP, Back plane, Advances.
• Waveguide – Channels, Resonators, Changes, Couplers.
• Filters – Pit Channels, Miniaturized scale strip, Dielectric.
• HFSS is an intelligent reproduction framework whose essential work
component is a tetrahedron. This enables you to unravel any subjective 3D
geometry, particularly those with complex bends and shapes, in a small amount
of the time it would take utilizing different methods.
• The name HFSS represents High Recurrence Structure Test system. Ansys
spearheaded the utilization of the Limited Component Strategy (FEM) for EM
recreation by creating/executing advances, for example, digressive vector limited
components, versatile cross section, and Versatile Lancozos - pade Breadth
(ALPS). Today, HFSS keeps on coming out on top with advancements, for
example, Modes to Hubs and Full-wave Zest.
• Ansys HFSS has advanced over a time of years with contribution from
numerous clients and businesses. In industry, Ansys HFSS is the apparatus of
decision for High profitability research, advancement, and virtual prototyping.
HFSS is utilized in different field to mimic and get required examples. Some of
them are
• Antennas
• Microwave advances
• Waveguide segments
• RF channels
• Three-dimensional discontinuities
• Passive circuit components
Page 8 of 53
figuring limit while conveyed at item estimating. A multicore 64-bit processor
framework can address a lot of Smash and permit huge document sizes. A
recommended examination framework might be something like: - Double Six Center
or Eight Center Processors - Windows 7 64bit - 1 GB (or higher) illustrations card
(DRD has had great involvement with NVIDIA cards). - 12-48 GB of Smash - DVD
R/W Drive.
Chapter 3: Theoretical analysis of the proposed antenna is discussed and also design
specifications are mentioned. The design flow of the proposed antenna is discussed.
Chapter 5: Gives a detailed analysis of the proposed antenna performance and final
results are shown. The characteristics of the proposed antenna are observed and
plotted.
Chapter 6: Concludes the highlights of our work in the project and future scope of
the antenna are discussed.
Page 9 of 53
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE SURVEY
In this literature survey, how a microstrip antenna is designed is observed through
different research papers. The following survey describes the step-by-step
analysis of design of a microstrip patch antenna. The limitations of microstrip
antenna are less data transmission capacity and low gain. These limitations are
improved by using various shapes of patch antenna, defected ground structure etc.
Page 10 of 53
2.3 DUALBAND ANTENNAS
Nada alaa et.al proposed a dual band millimeter wave circularly polarized
antenna for mobile communications [1]. This antenna is designed to operate at
38 GHz. The dimensions of the patch are 2.9mm x 2.9mm with the thickness
of 0.25mm. the achieved gain is 6.6dBi and radiation efficiency of 92%
respectively.
Wen duan et.al proposed a multiport patch antenna for flexible power
combining and feeding choice. It is designed to operate at 1.5 GHz [8]. The
substrate used is Rogers 4003C with relative permittivity of 3.38 and thickness
of 1.524mm. it produces a gain of -10dB.they are compared to further prove
the proposed power combining method in multiport antennas.
Peter Njogu et.al proposed 3D printed finger nail antennas for 5G applications.
They operate at 15 GHz frequency [16]. The dimensions are given as 19mm
x 15mm. and it perfectly matches at -10dB gain. The proposed on-body
antennas can find application in the Internet of Things (IoT) where large
amount of sensing data can be shared at the microwave and millimeter
Page 11 of 53
wave spectrum of future 5G communications. The removable finger nails
could include other electronic devices such as on-body sensors, computational,
storage and communication systems.
Julien Hautcoeur et.al proposed a 60 GHz frequency sensor antenna for short-
range millimeter wave detection application [4]. The design is based on the
following dimensions, they are: 47mm x 35mm with the thickness of 0254mm
resulting in high range radiation efficiency for image detecting systems. It
produces a gain of 22dBand fractional bandwidth of 2.5%. it acts as a
suitable solution for the low-cost realization of short range networks in 60
GHz band.
Demayana A Saleeb et.al proposed a technique for early detection of brain
cancer using circularly polarized reconfigurable antenna array. The antenna is
meant to operate at 2.4 GHz [5]. It is designed with FR-4 substrate with the
thickness of 0.035 mm and the dimensions are 200mm x 78mm. the measured
s11 and radiation pattern are in excellent argument with simulated ones.
Ka Ming Mak et.al proposed a circularly polarized patch antenna for future
fifth-generation mobile phones is presented in this paper [11].The impedance
bandwidth of the antenna is over 10%, and the 3-dB axial ratio bandwidth is
3.05%. The proposed antenna covers a wide elevation angle and complete
azimuth range. A parametric study of the effect of the metallic block and the
surrounding dielectric substrate on the gain at a low elevation angle and the
axial ratio of the proposed antenna are presented.
Mauricio Sanchez Barbetty et.al proposed a very simple surface-mount dual-
polarized active antenna module consists of up/down converter ICs mounted
directly on top of a patch antenna radiator. Measurements of both single- and
dual-polarized 10-GHz prototypes show a normal co-polarized radiation
pattern and less than 12 dB of cross polarization [12].
Le zou , et.al proposed a novel Ka-band compact monopulse radar antenna
design with a highly directional 2D series-fed microstrip array antenna [7].
The measured reflection coefficients of each port are lower than
−10 dB across 34.5 GHz to 35.5 GHz working band meanwhile isolation
between these ports is better than 25 dB. Furthermore, the first side lobe level
(FSLL) in the sum beam, which is remarkably suppressed by Taylor synthesis
Page 12 of 53
design method, achieves about −24 dB both in E and H planes. The measured
gain of the sum pattern achieves 25.3 dBi at 35 GHz center frequency, while
the nulling depth of the difference patterns in both planes are lower than −30
dB.
Qianwen Liu et.al proposed a differentially fed dual-band hybrid antenna with
broadside radiation, enhanced bandwidth, and high selectivity. For
demonstration, a prototype antenna with the dual bands at 3.5 and 5.8 GHz is
fabricated and tested [9]. The measured results show that the antenna has
achieved an improved bandwidth (|Sdd11| < −10 dB) from 3.26 to 3.58 GHz
and 5.60 to 5.90 GHz, respectively, with stable broadside gains of around 8.5
dBi. In addition, in the stop band, three radiation nulls are created at 3.71,
5.32, and 6.12 GHz for effective enhancement of dual-band frequency
selectivity.
Jia-Yi Szeet.al proposed the loading of a pair of right-angle slots and a
modified U-shaped slot in a rectangular microstrip patch, novel bandwidth
enhancement of microstrip antennas is demonstrated [14]. Required
dimensions of the right-angle slots and modified U-shaped slot for bandwidth
enhancement with good radiating characteristics have been determined
experimentally in this study and the obtained antenna bandwidth can be as
large as about 2.4 times that of a corresponding unslotted rectangular
microstrip antenna. Details of the antenna design and experimental results are
presented and discussed.
Rajesh Nema et.al designed an antenna to work for X-band applications[29].
The resonant frequency is taken 10 GHz and height of the dielectric substrate
is kept constant i.e., 1.5mm for all the five antennas. The antenna is showing
good results on 8 GHz frequency. This shift in the frequency is due to the
fringing fields along the edges. This study will help for authors and
researchers to get a fair idea of which substrate should be given preference and
why to fabricate microstrip patch antenna.
Page 13 of 53
CHAPTER 3
THEORETICAL
ANALYSIS
3. 1 PROPOSED DESIGN
Page 14 of 53
Figure 3.1 Proposed structure of antenna
Page 15 of 53
3.2 DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED ANTENNA
The three essential parameters for the design of a rectangular Microstrip Patch
Antenna is:
The resonant frequency of the antenna must be chosen properly. The Personal
Communication system (PCS) utilizes the frequency range from 1850-1990 MHz’s.
Page 16 of 53
Hence the antenna structured must be able to operate in this frequency range. For our
design 3 GHz resonant frequency is selected.
For our design FR4 EPOXY dielectric material is selected which is having dielectric
constant of 4.4. To reduce the dimensions of the antenna substrate with a high
dielectric constant is selected. Here, FR indicates Fire Retardant and number 4
indicates glass epoxy resin.
For the micro strip patch antenna to be used in cellular mobiles, it is important that the
antenna should not bulky in size. Hence, the height of the dielectric substrate is
selected as 1.6 mm.
3)Calculation of length
𝜀 (𝜀
𝑤
0 𝑒𝑓𝑓 + 0.8)
�
0.258) (
ℎ
Page 17 of 53
4) Return Loss
Return loss is a figure that means the proportion of radio waves appearing at the input
of the antenna that are eliminated as a ratio against those signals that are taken. For
example, a reception apparatus. In the system that the power given to the antenna
under-test (AUT) is P (in) and the power returned back to the input port is P(ref), the
level of difference between the occurrence and returned power in the travelling waves
is given by the proportion Pin/Pref. If this level results higher then, the better the
impedance matching is obtained.
𝑃𝑖
𝑅𝐿 = 10 𝑙𝑜𝑔 𝑑𝐵
𝑛
�𝑟𝑒
�𝑓
Expressed in dB, return loss is Which is a positive quantity if ref in P < Pi. Also
defined in another way, RL is the difference in decibels between the power transferred
towards the AUT and the power reflected. It is a positive non-dissipative term
representing the decrease in strength of the reflected wave in comparison with the
incident one. This is the situation for a passive AUT. A negative return loss is
possible with active devices. Expressing the power in terms of voltage (similar to field
strength) in a transmission line (assuming a passive AUT), then above equation
becomes
1
𝑅𝐿 = 10 𝑙𝑜𝑔 𝑑𝐵
𝜌2
Where ρ is the reflection coefficient at the input of the antenna under test AUT. That
is, return loss is the negative of the reflection coefficient expressed in terms of
decibels.
𝑅𝐿 = −20 log 𝜌 𝑑𝐵
Page 18 of 53
CHAPTER 4
Antennas are defined as a means for radiating or receiving radio waves. There are
various types of antennas: Wire Antennas, Aperture antennas, Microstrip antennas,
Reflector antennas, Lens antennas etc. Among all of them, microstrip antennas
became very much popular for space bourne applications. Microstrip patch antennas
consist of a dielectric substrate with a ground conducting plane on the other side. It
consist of a metallic patch on the grounded substrate. The configuration of patch may
differ upon the applications and operating frequencies. The proposed antenna consists
of the rectangular patch.
The dimension of the patch is defined by the patch length(L) and width(W). The
choice of substrate is also important. The essential factors like temperature, humanity
and environmental ranges of operation should be considered. The thickness of the
substrate(h) plays a significant role on the resonant frequency(fr) and bandwidth of
the antenna. The desirable advantages of microstrip patch antenna makes them
useful in many wireless communication applications. They have low profile,
lightweight, low volume, easy fabrication with low cost and supports both linear and
circular polarization, easily integrated with microwave integrated circuits, capable of
dual and triple frequency operations, mechanically robust.
They are well suited for applications like wireless communication systems, cellular
phones, pagers, radar systems and satellite communication system. The most
important advantage is the design of microstrip patch antenna using mictrostrip
transmission line feeding technique is so much easy to fabricate and easy to match
them by inset position control and to model.
However narrow bandwidth, low efficiency, large ohmic loss, capability to handle
low RF power and low gain in microstrip patch antenna are considered as the main
disadvantages. The bandwidth of microstrip patch antenna can be increased by
increasing the thickness of the substrate but within permissible limit. In this paper and
8 shaped slot microstrip patch antenna is designed.
Page 19 of 53
4.2 OVERALL VIEW OF DESIGN
Page 20 of 53
4.3 CREATION OF GROUND
The design begins with creation of ground. To create ground first open Ansys
electronic desktop version 18.
After opening the software on top you will find HFSS. Go to HFSS and click on insert
new HFSS. The coordinate system along with grid lines will be displayed on the
screen. Now from top select rectangle shape to draw ground. Because ground is a
two-dimensional structure. Now draw a rectangle randomly. To the left rectangle gets
displayed. Double click on rectangle and give the name as ground. And select the
transparency as 0. For vision refer the below figure.
Page 21 of 53
After this select create rectangle and enter the dimensions and positions and then
enter. For proper display select CTRL+D. Hence the ground is selected.
Page 22 of 53
4.4 CREATION OF STRIP
Create another rectangle on the ground for desired shape by using the dimensions which
are shown in figure
Page 23 of 53
4.5 CREATION OF SUBSTRATE
Page 24 of 53
The substrate will be created at required position.
Hence substrate is created on top of the ground with the substrate height as 1.575mm.
Now select the substrate material as Rogers RT/duroid 5880 which has relative
permittivity of 2.2. which is shown in above figure.
Page 25 of 53
Now double click on create rectangle, and enter the required dimension to create
patch. Then click ok. Hence patch will be created
Page 26 of 53
Line 14 19.24, -31.2 ,0 18.515, -22.7 ,0
Page 27 of 53
4.7 CREATION OF FEED
Feed is also a two-dimensional structure. For that adjust the axis into ZX Plane. Then
zoom in, draw a rectangle in the dimension of the strip. Hence the feed is created
Page 28 of 53
4.8 EXCITATION AND BOUNDARIES
4.8.1 EXCITATION
To assign excitation right click on feed --> excitation --> lumped port -->then
we will get a cursor of triangle shaped drag it from bottom to top on the feed. Verify the
excitation in project manager.
4.8.2 BOUNDARIES
Set back to XY mode after assigning excitation. Then right click on ground > assign
boundaries>select perfect E. Verify the assigned boundary in project manager.
Repeat the same for patch also. Hence boundaries are assigned.
Page 29 of 53
,
Figure 4.18 Representing the leaf shaped patch with strip and feed
Page 30 of 53
4.10 ANALYSIS SET UP AND ANALYSIS
After design is completed, it is ready to run. Now, we have to give analysis setup. To create an
analysis setup, select the menu item HFSS > Analysis-Setup > Add.
To add a frequency sweep, select the menu item as HFSS > Analysis Setup > Add
Sweep. Select Solution Setup: Setup-1. Click OK button. Then Edit Sweep Window.
Sweep Type: Fast, Frequency Setup Type: Linear Count, start: 2 GHz, Stop: 15 GHz,
Click OK button.
Page 31 of 53
4.10.3 MODEL VALIDATION
To validate the designed model, select the menu HFSS > Validation Check. Click the
Close button. If any errors or warnings messages occurred go to the Message Manager
4.10.4 ANALYZE
To run the simulation, click the green exclamation point in the toolbar (located next to
the green validation check mark). This will run all simulation setups associated with
the current design. Alternatively, you may right-click on an individual solution setup
(such as in the Project Manager and select 'Analyze').
Page 32 of 53
4.11 RESULTS
Page 33 of 53
CHAPTER 5
EXPRIMENTAL RESULTS
Iteration -1 is the same as original structure with the same dimensions but different
substrate.
Page 34 of 53
Figure 5.2 Representing the structure along with properties of substrate with
material FR4 EPOXY
Figure 5.3 Representing the S11 and VSWR plots of iteration-1 FR4 Epoxy
Page 35 of 53
Changing the substrate in the iteration-1
Structure from iteration-1 was finalized. In the same structure analysis of antenna
with different substrate material is observed.
Figure 5.4 Representing the structure along with properties of substrate with
material Gallium_Arsenide
Page 36 of 53
Figure 5.5 Representing the S11 and VSWR plots for Gallium Arsenide
Substrate
Figure 5.6 Representing the S11 and VSWR plots for Rogers RT/Duroid 5880(tm)
Substrate
Page 37 of 53
5.1.4 COMPARISON OF ITERATIONS
Here all the three iterations are compared together and found that the iteration-3
seems to give better performance compared to iteration 1 and iteration 2.
According to the analysis it is found that the antennas give better performance only
with the Rogers RT/Duroid 5880(tm) substrate. Hence it is finalized for the design.
Figure 5.8 Representing the VSWR plots for three different substrates
Page 38 of 53
5.2 MODIFICATIONS ON PATCH
Here the patch is lightly modified. A small circle of radius 2.82mm is placed at
the center of the patch. This turned into iteration 2
Structure from iteration-3 was finalized. In the same structure analysis of antenna
with different substrate material is observed.
Figure 5.9 Representing the structure along with properties of substrate with
material Rogers RT/duroid 5880 (tm)
Page 39 of 53
Wave forms are as follows
Figure 5.10 Representing the S11 and VSWR plots for Rogers RT/duroid 5880
(tm) substrate
Page 40 of 53
5.2.2 FR4 EPOXY SUBSTRATE
Changing of substrate is very simple, just click on substrate and edit the material as
“FR4 EPOXY”
Figure 5.11 Representing the structure along with the properties of substrate
with material FR4 EPOXY.
Wave forms are as follows:
Page 41 of 53
Figure 5.12 Representing the S11 and VSWR plots for FR4 EPOXY material
substrate
Page 42 of 53
5.2.3 Gallium Arsenide SUBSTRATE
similarly change the substrate as Rogers RO3006 and observe the result.
Page 43 of 53
Figure 5.14 Representing the S11 and VSWR wave forms for Gallium Arsenide’s
substrate
Figure 5.16 Representing the VSWR plots for three different substrates
Page 44 of 53
5.3 PARAMETERIC ANALYSIS
Page 45 of 53
3.1 Feed 6.2-6.4 6.23 3.17 -24
width(4mm)
8.0-8.15 8.12 1.87 -34.7
10.63-12.6 12.1 16.9 -28.56
5.4 CONCLUSION
Figure 5.26 Representing the overall S11 and VSWR plots for the proposed
structure
Page 48 of 53
CHAPTER 6
6.1 CONCLUSION
It is an maple leaf shape patch antenna, with patch dimensions 20mm x 30mm, with
the thickness of 1.6mm, using FR-4 epoxy substrate with relative permittivity ε r=4.4.
The Eight-shaped patch is modified using a circular slot in the middle and two small
rectangular slots at the opposite of the patch, which turned into a better result by
providing the frequencies at 6.5GHz (Wi-Fi), 8.12GHz (C and X bands), 12.1GHz
(WIMAX). It is used for wireless communications as mentioned above. The simulated
and measured results are in good agreement. a maple leaf shape UWB antenna with
dual band notch functionality. The antenna is simulated and fabricated on the low loss
material of a Rogers 5880 substrate. The antenna system has compact dimensions of
33 ×34 ×1.575 mm. Notches in the proposed antenna are created by optimally placing
notching structures in the radiation element and feeding line. The antenna system is
analyzed in term of return loss, VSWR, surface current density and radiation
characteristics and gain. A good agreement is observed between the simulated and
measured results.
The future scope for the designed antenna is, the antennas can be designed with low
and a smaller number of dimensions to work at high number of frequencies. It also
can be achieved by further modifications on the patch like using different shapes of
patches.
Page 49 of 53
REFERENCES
[2] Xiaocheng Wang (Graduate Student Member, IEEE), Gaobiao Xiao (Senior
Member, IEEE), “Broadband D-Band Patch Antenna Array In Wafer-Level Package
Based On BCB Process” IEEE Open Journal Of Antennas And Propagation , October
2022.
[3] Falih M. Alnahwi, Yasir I. A. Al-Yasir, (Member, Ieee), Nazar T. Ali 2,3, (Senior
Member, IEEE), “A Compact Wideband Circularly Polarized Planar Monopole
Antenna with Axial Ratio Bandwidth Entirely Encompassing the Antenna
Bandwidth”
[4] Julien Hautcoeur, Alireza Ghayekhloo “60 GHz Frequency Sensor Antenna for
Short-Range Millimeter-Wave Detection Application” IEEE sensor letters VOL. 6,
NO. 10, OCTOBER 2022.
[6] Wei Nie,Huai-Zhi Wen, Kai-Da Xu (Senior Member, IEEE), Yu-Quan Luo, Xiao-
Long Yang (Member, IEEE), And Mu Zhou (Senior Member, IEEE) “A Compact
4×4 Filtering Microstrip Patch Antenna Array with Dolph-Chebyshev Power
Distribution” IEEE open journal of antennas and propagation, September 2022.
[7] Le Zou, Xuetian Wang, And Jiawei Zang , (Member, IEEE) 1“Series-Fed
monopulse Microstrip Array Antenna With Stripline Quadrature Hybrid Comparator
Network” IEEE open access journal, December 2021.
[8] Wen Duan, Shaowei Liao, (Senior Member, IEEE), Xiu Yin Zhang , (Senior
Member, IEEE), Yuan Chun Li, (Member, IEEE), And Quan Xue , (Fellow, IEEE)
Page 50 of 53
“Multi-Port Patch Antennas For Flexible Power Combining And Feeding Choice”
IEEE open access journal, November 2018.
[9] Qianwen Liu And Lei Zhu (Fellow, IEEE) “A Low-Profile Dual-Band Filtering
Hybrid Antenna with Broadside Radiation Based on Patch and SIW Resonators”
IEEE open journal of antennas and propagation, November 2021.
[10 ]Jun Hu , (Student Member, IEEE), And Zhang-Cheng Hao , (Senior Member,
IEEE) “Design of a Frequency and Polarization Reconfigurable Patch Antenna With a
Stable Gain” IEEE open access journal, November 2018.
[11] Ka Ming Mak , Hau Wah Lai , (Senior Member, IEEE), Kwai Man Luk ,
(Fellow, IEEE), AND CHI HOU CHAN2 , (Fellow, IEEE) “Circularly Polarized
Patch Antenna for Future 5G Mobile Phones” IEEE open journal access, December
2014.
[14] Jia-Yi Sze, Member, IEEE, and Kin-Lu Wong, Senior Member, IEEE “Slotted
Rectangular Microstrip Antenna for Bandwidth Enhancement” Ieee Transactions On
Antennas And Propagation, Vol. 48, No. 8, August 2000
[15] S. H. Sun, K. F. Man, B.-Z. Wang, and T. P. Won “An Optimized Wideband
Quarter-Wave Patch Antenna Design” IEEE antennas and wireless propagation
letters, vol. 4, 2005.
[16] Peter Njogu, Benito Sanz-Izquierdo , (Member, IEEE), Ahmed Elibiary 2 , Sung
Yun Jun 3 , (Member, IEEE), Zhijiao Chen 4 , (Member, IEEE), And David Bird
“3D Printed Fingernail Antennas For 5G Applications”IEEE open access journal ,
December 2020.
Page 51 of 53
[17] Asmita Mhamane and Meenakshi Pawar, “Designing of wideband Microstrip
patch antenna for wireless applications”, International Journal of Computer
Applications (IJCA), 2013.
[18] Bhanu Priya Kumawat, Santosh Meena and Sanjeev Yadav, “Square Shape
Slotted Multiband Microstrip Patch Antenna Using Defect Ground Structure”, IEEE,
International Conference on Information, Communication, Instrumentation and
Control (ICICIC), 2017.
[19] Bharatendra Singh Niboriya, Chetan Choudhary and Gyan Prabhakar, “S-shape
Wideband Microstrip Patch Antenna with Enhanced Gain and Bandwidth for Wireless
Communication”, International Journal of Computer Applications Volume 73– No.7,
2013.
[20] Sohag Kumar Saha, Md. Amirul Islam and Md. Masudur Rahman “Design and
Simulation of 8 shape slotted Microstrip Patch Antenna” ,2014
[21] Balanis .C.A.,2012 Antenna Theory:Analysis and Design. John Willey & Sons
[23] Stutzman, W.L. and W.A. Davis, 1998. Antenna theory. John Wiley and
Sons, Inc.
[24] Ahuja, N., J. Kaur and R. Khanna, 2012. Study and Investigations on Various
Microstrip Patch Antennas for Wireless Applications
[25] Garg, R., (Ed.). 2001. Microstrip antennas design handbook. Artech House
[26] Gaurav Mahambre, Uttam Prabhu Dessai, Anirudh Kakule, Yeshudas Muttu
“DESIGN & SIMULATION OF 8-SHAPE SLOTTED MICROSTRIP PATCH
ANTENNA”
[27] Houda Werfelli, Khaoula Tayari, Mondher Chaoui, Mongi Lahiani and Hamadi
Ghariani, “Design of Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna”, 2nd International
Conference on Advanced Technologies for Signal and Image Processing –2016.
Page 52 of 53
[28] Gazala Pravin and A. K. Rastogi, “Low cost microstrip patch antenna array for
wireless communications”, JETIR 2018.
[30] Jiaqian Cui , Anxue Zhang , and Xiaoming Chen , Senior Member, IEEE “An
Omnidirectional Multiband Antenna for Railway Application” Antennas And
Wireless Propagation Letters, Vol. 19, No. 1, January 2020
Page 53 of 53