jzus.A2200403
jzus.A2200403
jzus.A2200403
www.jzus.zju.edu.cn; www.springer.com/journal/11582
E-mail: jzus_a@zju.edu.cn
Review
https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2200403
Abstract: Biomaterial research has been going on for several years, and many companies are heavily investing in new product
development. However, it is a contentious field of science. Biomaterial science is a field that combines materials science and
medicine. The replacement or restoration of damaged tissues or organs enhances the patient’s quality of life. The deciding
aspect is whether or not the body will accept a biomaterial. A biomaterial used for an implant must possess certain qualities to
survive a long time. When a biomaterial is used for an implant, it must have specific properties to be long-lasting. A variety of
materials are used in biomedical applications. They are widely used today and can be used individually or in combination. This
review will aid researchers in the selection and assessment of biomaterials. Before using a biomaterial, its mechanical and
physical properties should be considered. Recent biomaterials have a structure that closely resembles that of tissue. Anti-
infective biomaterials and surfaces are being developed using advanced antifouling, bactericidal, and antibiofilm technologies.
This review tries to cover critical features of biomaterials needed for tissue engineering, such as bioactivity, self-assembly,
structural hierarchy, applications, heart valves, skin repair, bio-design, essential ideas in biomaterials, bioactive biomaterials,
bioresorbable biomaterials, biomaterials in medical practice, biomedical function for design, biomaterial properties such as
biocompatibility, heat response, non-toxicity, mechanical properties, physical properties, wear, and corrosion, as well as biomaterial
properties such surfaces that are antibacterial, nanostructured materials, and biofilm disrupting compounds, are all being
investigated. It is technically possible to stop the spread of implant infection.
Key words: Surface severe plastic deformation (SSPD); Hyaluronan (HA); Extracellular matrix (ECM); Polyvinylchloride
(PVC); Tissue engineering (TE)
first employed biomaterials, which used sutures made (Yilmaz et al., 2019; Motameni et al., 2021; Alshem‐
of animal sinew to repair wounds. Among other medi‐ ary et al., 2022b). Everything that can be used instead
cal, biological, physical, and chemical domains, tissue of living things is called biomaterial. There are many
engineering and materials science have had a more different biomaterials, which are natural and artificial
significant recent impact on the contemporary field of materials. The biological material is made by a living
biomaterials than any of these disciplines combined thing, like skin or an artery. Fig. 2 shows biomaterials
until recently (Mohammed et al., 2020; Mahmood required for tissue engineering of salient features.
et al., 2022; Noori et al., 2022). The use of non-living
materials and living cells in biomaterials can be com‐
bined. Engineers can create molded or machined parts,
coatings, and fabrics for biomedical devices and other
consumer goods and industrial applications using these
materials. Depending on the category, many medical
devices may be included. They typically decay fast in
the body after completing their intended function;
some are even bioabsorbable (Ahmed and Moham‐
med, 2020; Ahmed et al., 2020; Govindan et al., 2022).
Biomaterials can be divided into two categories: thera‐
peutic materials and diagnostic materials. Fig. 1 shows
different types of biomaterials.
1.1 Bioactivity
Bioactivity is the ability of a biomaterial to make
a person’s body do something good for the material’s
job and efficiency (Alshemary et al., 2022a, 2022c).
When materials are implanted in the body, the term
osseoconductive conductor refers to materials that
work as osseoconductive conductors. It can be found
in bioactive glasses and ceramics. Most importantly,
the materials used in implanted bone stimulate bone
growth while also breaking down the body’s fluids.
When hydroxyapatite forms on the surface of bioma‐
terials, it is common to find out how good they are for
humans (Qin et al., 2021). Fig. 3 shows the different
Fig. 1 Types of biomaterials impacts of biomaterials.
1.2 Self assembly
Therapeutic biomaterials are used in medical de‐
vices to treat or improve the function of tissues in the In the scientific community, the phrase “self-
body. Biomaterials used in tissue repair or replace‐ assembly” is frequently used to describe the phenome‐
ment replace lost or damaged tissue because of injury non in which particles spontaneously assemble with‐
or disease. Biomaterials can be looked at with terms out the assistance of an external force (Jin M et al.,
that are both biological and engineering. Trauma, dis‐ 2021). Massive clusters of these particles can com‐
ease, and degeneration can lead to surgery to fix bine to create one of seven crystal systems that are
things, which can happen if needed. People with thermodynamically stable and structurally well-defined
broken bones usually need to have them replaced in metallurgy and mineralogy. A well-known fact is
J Zhejiang Univ-Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng) 2023 24(11):1027-1042 | 1029
stimuli-responsive polymeric materials in recent years. external magnetic field, their rheological and me‐
Cartilage, bone, heart, and neurological tissue are all chanical properties alter. MRFs are well-known for
part of this category, as are the expensive biomedical their severe stress amplification in a magnetic field,
equipment used to administer drugs. When external while MREs well-known for their modulus altera‐
magnetic or electric fields are applied, a particular class tions (Bastola et al., 2020). However, MREs have a
of stimuli-responsive materials known as magneto/ relatively short history as a counterpoint to MRFs.
electro-responsive polymers (MERPs) is activated. After initial studies on MREs were conducted, a novel
Regulation of MERPs (multifunctional, dynamic, and class of MR materials called MR plastomers (MRPs)
fast reversible characteristics) is achieved at various has the potential to create intelligent materials and
length scales (Wu et al., 2020). structures distinct from MREs and MRFs. The highly
mobile magnetic particles give MRPs plastic proper‐
1.4 Bio-design
ties even at room temperature and have more sub‐
Unmet clinical requirements can only be ad‐ stantial MR effects than MREs. MRPs are unsuit‐
dressed via innovation. Worldwide, medical devices able for vibration isolators and absorbers due to their
and implants are in great demand, with India being meager beginning moduli. But MRPs have the po‐
the most prominent market. Medical technology inno‐ tential as a package for elastic, flexible, and conduc‐
vation is needed today, more than ever, to address tive sensors and actuators like on/off switches. MREs
local problems and bring about lasting solutions (Yu experience dynamic changes in stiffness, natural fre‐
et al., 2021). The recognition of the need to encourage quency, and damping capacity in response to an ap‐
and promote indigenous affordable medical innova‐ plied magnetic field. Supplies classified as multi-role
tions has taken steps to establish med-tech innovation equipment (ME) can be used in various situations and
bio-design initiatives and capacity for creative medi‐ are highly versatile. Changes in behavior, such as a
cal technology research prototyping, validation, and shift in modulus or stiffness, are less prevalent (Dargahi
testing. The main goal is to develop innovative, low- et al., 2019).
cost medical implants and technology for the benefit Consequently, there has been an explosion of re‐
of the whole nation. The bio-design goals are shown search investigating MRE behavior concerning attri‐
in Fig. 5. bute changes in the past few years. MEs alter their be‐
havior by changing stiffness, natural frequency, damp‐
ing capacity, storage/loss modulus, and complicated
viscosity. Sandwich beams and vibration absorbers/
isolators are only two examples of technical applica‐
tions that benefit from ME’s malleable stiffness and
modulus.
regeneration due to their superior physicochemical by new tissue, a process known as resorption (such
and biocompatibility. Biodegradable polymers’ in‐ as bone). Other bioresorbable compounds include
teractions with in-vivo and in-vitro testing methodolo‐ polylactic–polyglycolic acid copolymers, tricalcium
gies for future evaluation of degradation and biologi‐ phosphate [Ca3(PO4)2], and polylactic–polyglycolic
cal properties are also highlighted (Mondal et al., acid copolymers. Other typical materials employed in
2016). Biomedical engineers will be of greater use to recent decades include calcium oxide, calcium carbon‐
the clinical community if they bear the above in mind. ate, and gypsum.
2.2 Biomaterials in medical practice
2 Biomaterial classifications, biomaterials in Several applications for biomaterials in medicine,
medical practice, and biomaterials designed research, and bioengineering, including the following,
for function are shown in Fig. 6. It is one of the main reasons bio‐
materials are used. They replace hard or soft tissues
Artificial implants can produce a range of reac‐ damaged or destroyed by the disease. Most people’s
tions in the tissue once implanted. Tissue reacts to the tissues and structures last for a long time, but they can
implant’s surface and determines how the implant in‐ be damaged by fractures, infections, and cancer (Jin S
teracts with the surrounding tissues. The majority of et al., 2021).
the time, a biomaterial can be defined or classed in Orthopedics: Biomaterials are used in many ways,
three ways based on the tissues’ responses (Bhattacha‐ but orthopedic implant devices are the most common.
ryya et al., 2021; Momin et al., 2021; Saydé et al., Osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis change the
2021; Wang F et al., 2021; Hayajneh and Al-Oqla, structure of joints that can move freely, like the hip,
2022).
knee, shoulder, ankle, and elbow.
2.1 Biomaterial classifications Cardiovascular applications: Heart valves and ar‐
teries can have cardiovascular circulatory problems.
2.1.1 Bioinert biomaterials Implants can be used to fix these problems.
The materials that are not harmful to the body Ophthalmics: The tissues in the eye can get sick
after they are put inside the body are stainless steel, from many different things, making it hard to see and
titanium, alumina, zirconia, and ultra-high molecular eventually leading to blindness. Cataracts, for exam‐
weight polyethylene, among other things. Bioinert ma‐ ple, cause the lens to become cloudy. If users do not
terials have minimal contact with the body’s surround‐ want this, users can get a synthetic (polymer) intraoc‐
ing tissue after being transplanted into the body. A ular lens instead.
bioinert implant’s biological usefulness depends on Dental applications: People with bacteria in their
how well it can work with its tissue. A fibrous capsule mouths can quickly kill their teeth and the gums that
can form around non-bioinert implants. hold them in place. People with dental caries, which
are holes in their teeth caused by plaque’s metabolic
2.1.2 Bioactive biomaterials activity, can lose a lot of teeth.
Bioactive implants and the body fluids surround‐ Wound healing: There were first sutures, and they
ing them undergo an ion-exchange process, which cre‐ were used to close wounds. Implantable biomaterials
ates an implant-surface layer composed of carbonate can be traced back to this time. It is common for syn‐
apatite (CHAp), which is physiologically active and thetic sutures to make polymers, but some metals can
has a mineral-equivalent carbonate composition. In also make stitches.
terms of chemical composition and crystallographic
2.3 Biomaterials designed for function
structure, this layer is analogous to the mineral phase
of bone in the human body. Bioengineers evaluate the performance of a bio‐
material’s properties, depending on how well it per‐
2.1.3 Bioresorbable biomaterials
forms a particular activity and how it will be used
As soon as they enter the body, bioresorbable ma‐ (Bonferoni et al., 2021; Janarthanan and Noh, 2021;
terials dissolve (resorb) and are eventually replaced Liu et al., 2021; Yeung and Kelly, 2021). New skin
1032 | J Zhejiang Univ-Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng) 2023 24(11):1027-1042
Fig. 7 SEM images, TEM images, and modes of four nanocrystals (Li et al., 2018): (a) SEM images; (b) TEM images;
(c) selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns for the four micro/nanocrystal structures product models derived
from SAED and crystal parameters. Reprinted from (Li et al., 2018), Copyright 2018, with permission from American
Chemical Society
Numerous bacteria produce enzymes released a polymer chain on its surface. The material disinte‐
outside their cell walls, such as extracellular polyhy‐ grates layer by layer (surface erosion, not inside the
droxybutyrate (PHB) depolymerase. The enzymes polymer matrix). SEM pictures of PLA and its compos‐
initially adhere to the surface of polymer materials via ites after 14 d in compost and mud are shown in Fig. 9.
their C-terminal substrate-binding domains. They then Polylactic acid (PLA) and its composites’ surface
use their N-terminal catalytic regions to degrade poly‐ morphology changed. All of the polymer materials
mer chains (Adorinni et al., 2021; Sivasankarapillai examined exhibited biodegradation. Composites of
et al., 2021). Enzymes can cleave specific segments of PLA and starch (50: 50) exhibited more alterations
1034 | J Zhejiang Univ-Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng) 2023 24(11):1027-1042
Fig. 9 PLA and PLA/starch samples before they were broken down (a and b), after they were broken down in compost
(c and d), and in soil for 14 d (e and f). Reprinted from (Wilfred et al., 2018), Copyright 2018, with permission from
Innovation Info
Different kinds of artificial implants made of tests to ensure that materials are safe for people. In
metals, ceramics, polymers, and composites are safe the long run, if a biomaterial that has not been ade‐
for people to have in other body parts, depending on quately tested is implanted, it may cause a long-term
where they are put. Ceramics are the most common biological reaction (Ma et al., 2022). The biomaterials
material used to repair hard tissue that has been dam‐ used in an implant must be checked for risks to last a
aged (Kumari and Chatterjee, 2021; Sadowska et al., long time in the body. Table 1 describes the classifica‐
2021). Because different tests must be done depend‐ tion of biocompatible polymer optical fiber.
ing on how long the material is in contact with the
5.1.1 Cytotoxicity
body to ensure it is biocompatible. Fig. 12 shows how
bioceramic materials are tested in vitro and how they Plant a cell or put the cell in a solution from ex‐
can be harmful. tracting the material to determine how a specific cell
Biocompatibility is very important for any mate‐ type reacts to a particular material. Choosing the right
rial used in the body, so regulatory bodies have set up cell lines, controls, biochemical assay type, and culture
1036 | J Zhejiang Univ-Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng) 2023 24(11):1027-1042
Table 1 Classification of biocompatible polymer optical fiber for people to have in their bodies for a long time.
Category Material They can get into the cytoplasm of a eukaryotic cell
Multifunctional PC, COC, CPE because they are tiny (Park KM et al., 2022). In one
Natural materials Silk, cellulose case, zirconium oxide particles that came out of bone
cement when worn down are an exception to this rule.
Elastomers PDMS, POC-POMC
It has been said that when these nanoparticles get in‐
Hydrogel PEG, PEGDA, PAAm
side the body, they can make reactive oxygen species
Synthetic PLA, PGA, PLGA, PLLA
(ROS) and make the body more oxidatively stressed,
PC: polycarbonate; COC: cyclic olefin copolymer; CPE: conductive but this is not true. It can also cause other signaling
polyethylene; PDMS: polydimethylsiloxane; POC-POMC: poly (oc‐
tamethylene citrate)-poly (octamethylene maleate citrate); PEG: poly pathways to be activated, leading to the aberration
(ethylene glycol); PEGDA: poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate; PAAm: or double-strand breaks of chromosomes in the nu‐
polyacrylamide; PGA: poly (glycolic acid); PLGA: poly (lactic-co-
glycolic acid); PLLA: poly (L-lactic acid)
cleus, affecting cell division and growth. Different
gene regulatory proteins are turned on in other cells
time all play a significant role in whether a material when a virus damages a cell. It can happen when on‐
can be used with other things. On cell lines from mice, cogenes are turned on or tumor suppressor genes
humans (and other animals), the toxic residues from do not work (Abreu et al., 2022). A tumor can start
three polymeric biomaterials did not make any differ‐ when these things happen. If biomaterials can cause
ence in how sensitive the cells were to them. More cancer, relevant in vitro methods should be used to
evaluation methods and specific cell lines should be see if this is the case. Tiny particles of cadmium, co‐
used (Park SY et al., 2022; Suvindran et al., 2022; balt, cobalt-chromium alloy, and nickel have been
Szczuka et al., 2022). Tissue osteoblast and keratino‐ found to cause cancer in people who use orthopedic
cyte cell lines can also be used to check the cell com‐ implants. These metals are used in many types of
patibility of orthopedic implant materials. Wound dress‐ orthopedic implants. Biomaterial implants’ toxicity
ing materials can also be tested for their cytotoxicity, and long-term stability can be tested more effectively
which can be done with different types of cells. For a and in biologically relevant ways. Even though com‐
new biomaterial to move from the lab to the clinic, it paring the biocompatibility results of new mate‐
must undergo rigorous tests, as shown in Fig. 13. rial in vitro and in vivo can show its safety, its true
fate will only be known when used in people (Liu
et al., 2022). Fig. 14 shows possible ways that nano‑
particles and micron particles enter the body and cause
genotoxicity.
5.1.2 Genotoxicity
Fig. 14 Genotoxicity representation. Reprinted from (do
Implant materials and particles that come with Nascimento et al., 2017), Copyright 2017, with permission
them are a big part of figuring out how safe they are from Springer Nature
J Zhejiang Univ-Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng) 2023 24(11):1027-1042 | 1037
6 Conclusions and future directions drugs. The chemical and biological characteristics re‐
stricting medicine delivery are still a mystery, so kineti‐
Biotechnology could improve people’s health and cally controlling the release of medicines remains a
quality of life if used correctly. This procedure could challenging problem (Xu et al., 2021). Over 50 years
provide compounds of extensive utility. Utilization pos‐ of encapsulation and release materials have been de‐
sibilities are vast due to the molecular and atomic com‐ veloped to release bioactive pharmaceuticals over a
binations. Biomaterials with this technique may be used long period and (in the best case scenario) begin inter‐
in various fields, including medicine, dentistry, veteri‐ actions with the host to control how much medication
nary care, and even mechanical engineering. Fabricat‐ is taken from the capsule. While conventional chemi‐
ing biosensors, drug delivery systems, and scaffolds cals like silver nanoparticles or silver nitrate have
are a few of this technique’s possible uses. The ability demonstrated biocidal activity against human patho‐
to accurately adjust stoichiometry and particle size gens (both gram-negative and positive) and bacteria
during production is possible. From their early days, resistant to quaternary amine, lignin-derived nanopar‐
when they were used by surgeons performing amaz‐ ticles have shown biocidal activity at significantly
ing surgeries with the aid of engineers, the areas of bi‐ lower silver concentrations, resulting in an inactive bio‐
ology and bioengineering have come a long way. Just degradable particle after release, which has less of an
as a wide range of materials can be utilized to make effect on the environment (Kalirajan et al., 2021). An
biomaterials, so can their medical applications. Bio‐ immobilized (or “spatially restricted”) catalyst is con‐
materials can be used to create replacement heart tained in lignin colloidal particles. The research will
valves and other organs for patients needing repair. Use emphasize the design, characterization, and potential
it on items that can move, like the hydroxyapatite- uses of nanostructured lignin hydrogels. No investiga‐
coated hip implant from 20 years ago. The medical tions into drug release or biocompatibility have been
device industry heavily uses biomaterials because of carried out despite the idea that carriers play a role in
their pivotal role in the healthcare system. Products medication delivery. During the precipitation step, the
for hard and soft tissues, biomedical devices, pharma‐ researchers added the hydrophobic insecticide Aver‐
ceuticals, test kits, and more can all be found in the mectine to the particles and examined the microparti‐
medical sector. However, there is still a long way to cles for drug release and ultraviolet (UV) protection,
go. Biomaterials used in modern medical therapies, among other properties (Wan et al., 2021).
such as those for preventing and treating major heredi‐
6.2 Tissue engineering scaffolds
tary diseases, may vary in response to new medical
needs. We can expect a surge in the popularity of metal, An interdisciplinary approach is taken while
ceramic, and polymer implants for medical use. Re‐ looking into the various biomaterials utilized in tissue
searchers in molecular biology, biochemistry, genet‐ engineering and regenerative medicine. Scaffolds can
ics, and physics are merging their efforts to develop be used for multiple purposes, some of which are at
more effective biomaterials for specific applications. odds with one another (Rashid et al., 2021). If harm‐
Biocompatibility, bioactivity or surface reactivity, ful degradation products are to be avoided, scaffolds
biodegradability, stabilizability, good mechanical and for bone regeneration must be disintegrated and re‐
physical features, manufacturability, low weight, af‐ placed with natural bone. Allogeneic bone transplants
fordability, and accessibility are all traits to look for in are the second most common source of replacement
a material. Molecular and genetic approaches to dis‐ bones, behind the chin, retro-molar area, iliac crest,
ease research have led to exciting new developments and trabecular bone (available from bone banks). In
in diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. A biomaterial addition to allogeneic and xenogeneic transplants, there
is any synthetic material that could be used in medi‐ are also xenogeneic and alloplastic transplants (which
cine. For instance, a biomaterial heart valve replace‐ use materials like hydroxyapatite or tricalcium phos‐
ment could be passive or active. phate). Patients can now receive treatments specifically
suited to their needs because of advancements in stem
6.1 Drug encapsulation and release gels and hydrogels
cell technology. A variety of factors influence biocom‐
Much interdisciplinary research has been con‐ patibility (Khalid et al., 2021). These include long-
ducted on biomaterials used in the administration of term stability against physiological media, mechanical
1038 | J Zhejiang Univ-Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng) 2023 24(11):1027-1042
strength depending on the application’s mechanical therapy of the future. Cells, 11(1):43.
strength, corrosion resistance, residual-free metabo‐ https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11010043
Ackun-Farmmer MA, Overby CT, Haws BE, et al., 2021. Bio‐
lism, and adequate technical capability for a given ap‐
materials for orthopedic diagnostics and theranostics.
plication. Comprehending the adhesion mechanisms Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering, 19:100308.
on cell–biomaterial surfaces and interfaces is the first https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobme.2021.100308
step in understanding cell–biomaterial interactions. Dif‐ Adorinni S, Cringoli MC, Perathoner S, et al., 2021. Green
ferent surface polarities, surface roughness, and topog‐ approaches to carbon nanostructure-based biomaterials.
Applied Sciences, 11(6):2490.
raphy influence how hydrophilic and hydrophobic sur‐
https://doi.org/10.3390/APP11062490
faces interact. In this method, polymers are made with Ahmed DS, Mohammed MKA, 2020. Studying the bactericidal
well-defined porosity structures, allowing cells to grow ability and biocompatibility of gold and gold oxide nano‑
into them as they are built (Bello et al., 2020). It is particles decorating on multi-wall carbon nanotubes.
essential to tailor the properties of polymers for each Chemical Papers, 74(11):4033-4046.
specific application. Surface polarity and topography https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-020-01223-0
Ahmed DS, Mohammed MKA, Mohammad MR, 2020. Sol–
must be adapted to the shape of cells to promote cell
gel synthesis of Ag-doped titania-coated carbon nanotubes
adhesion, proliferation, and growth. Polyurethane (PU) and study their biomedical applications. Chemical Papers,
has also been the topic of numerous studies regarding 74(1):197-208.
its applications in tissue engineering (Hussain et al., https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-019-00869-9
2021). Because of the extensive range of polyol and Al Rugaie O, Jabir MS, Mohammed MKA, et al., 2022.
Modification of SWCNTs with hybrid materials ZnO–
isocyanate components for PU synthesis available, it
Ag and ZnO–Au for enhancing bactericidal activity of
is feasible to modify the internal structure and mor‐ phagocytic cells against Escherichia coli through NOX2
phology of PU materials to appear and feel like actual pathway. Scientific Reports, 12(1):17203.
bone while also encouraging tissue ingrowth stiff or https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-022-22193-1
flexible osteogenic differentiation in bone tissue stim‐ Alhujaily M, Albukhaty S, Yusuf M, et al., 2022. Recent ad‐
ulated by the addition of iron oxide nanoparticles vances in plant-mediated zinc oxide nanoparticles with
their significant biomedical properties. Bioengineering,
having super magnetic characteristics (Chao et al., 9(10):541.
2021). They implant human bone marrow stem cells https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9100541
(hBMSCs) into PU scaffolds with better osteogenesis Alshemary AZ, Hussain R, Dalgic AD, et al., 2022a. Bacteri‐
than the control PU scaffolds. Lignin-based polyure‐ cidal and in vitro osteogenic activity of nano sized cobalt-
thanes (lignin-PU) are projected to rise in importance doped silicate hydroxyapatite. Ceramics International,
48(19):28231-28239.
as preferred study materials because of their poten‐
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.06.128
tial as biodegradable tissue engineering scaffolds and Alshemary AZ, Motameni A, Evis Z, 2022b. Biomedical ap‐
drug encapsulation materials. The mechanical stabil‐ plications of metal oxide–carbon composites. In: Chaudhry
ity of agarose/lignin composites has been improved by MA, Hussain R, Butt FK (Eds.), Metal Oxide-Carbon
partially using lignin to replace polysaccharide com‐ Hybrid Materials. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands,
p.371-405.
ponents (Rahmati et al., 2020).
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822694-0.00004-1
Alshemary AZ, Muhammed Y, Salman NA, et al., 2022c. In
Author contributions vitro degradation and bioactivity of antibacterial chromium
Reeya AGRAWAL: conceptualization, methodology, data doped β-tricalcium phosphate bioceramics. Ceramics–
curation, writing-original draft; Anjan KUMAR: conceptual‐ Silikáty, 66(3):347-353.
ization, review, and editing; Sangeeta SINGH: supervision and Arif MM, Khan SM, Gull N, et al., 2021. Polymer-based bio‐
validation; Mustafa K. A. MOHAMMED: supervision. materials for chronic wound management: promises and
challenges. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 598:
Conflict of interest 120270.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120270
Reeya AGRAWAL, Anjan KUMAR, Mustafa K. A.
Arif ZU, Khalid MY, Zolfagharian A, et al., 2022. 4D bio‐
MOHAMMED, and Sangeeta SINGH declare that they have
printing of smart polymers for biomedical applications:
no conflict of interest.
recent progress, challenges, and future perspectives. Reac‐
tive and Functional Polymers, 179:105374.
References https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2022.105374
Abreu H, Canciani E, Raineri D, et al., 2022. Extracellular Bastola AK, Paudel M, Li L, et al., 2020. Recent progress of
vesicles in musculoskeletal regeneration: modulating the magnetorheological elastomers: a review. Smart Materials
J Zhejiang Univ-Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng) 2023 24(11):1027-1042 | 1039
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.128 https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2021.1989407
Książek M, 2021. Retracted: application of sulfur waste in Mondal D, Griffith M, Venkatraman SS, 2016. Polycaprolactone-
biomaterials. Composites Part B: Engineering, 217:108848. based biomaterials for tissue engineering and drug deliv‐
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108848 ery: current scenario and challenges. International Jour‐
Kumar A, Collini L, Ursini C, et al., 2022. Energy absorption nal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials,
and stiffness of thin and thick-walled closed-cell 3D- 65(5):255-265.
printed structures fabricated from a hyperelastic soft poly‐ https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2015.1103241
mer. Materials, 15(7):2441. Moreno MA, Gonzalez-Rico J, Lopez-Donaire ML, et al.,
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15072441 2021. New experimental insights into magneto-mechanical
Kumari S, Chatterjee K, 2021. Biomaterials-based formula‐ rate dependences of magnetorheological elastomers. Com‐
tions and surfaces to combat viral infectious diseases. APL posites Part B: Engineering, 224:109148.
Bioengineering, 5(1):011503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109148
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0029486 Morita J, Ando Y, Komatsu S, et al., 2021. Mechanical prop‐
Li YX, Wang SS, Jin LZ, et al., 2018. Self-assembly rules of erties and reliability of parametrically designed architected
dumbbell-shaped molecules and their effect on morphol‐ materials using urethane elastomers. Polymers, 13(5):842.
ogy and photophysical behaviors of micro/nanocrystals. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13050842
Crystal Growth & Design, 18(9):4822-4828. Motameni A, Alshemary AZ, Evis Z, 2021. A review of syn‐
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.8b00652 thesis methods, properties and use of monetite cements
Liu YY, Jiang HM, Zhang LT, et al., 2022. Diluted acetic acid as filler for bone defects. Ceramics International, 47(10):
softened intermuscular bones from silver carp (Hypoph‐ 13245-13256.
thalmichthys molitrix) by dissolving hydroxyapatite and https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.01.240
collagen. Foods, 11(1):1. Musioł M, Sikorska W, Janeczek H, et al., 2018. (Bio)degrad‐
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11010001 able polymeric materials for a sustainable future–part 1.
Liu ZQ, Liu XL, Ramakrishna S, 2021. Surface engineering Organic recycling of PLA/PBAT blends in the form of
of biomaterials in orthopedic and dental implants: strate‐ prototype packages with long shelf-life. Waste Manage‐
gies to improve osteointegration, bacteriostatic and bac‐ ment, 77:447-454.
tericidal activities. Biotechnology Journal, 16(7):2000116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.030
https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.202000116 Nace SE, Tiernan J, Holland D, et al., 2021. A comparative
Ma CL, Nikiforov A, de Geyter N, et al., 2022. Plasma for analysis of the compression characteristics of a thermo‐
biomedical decontamination: from plasma-engineered to plastic polyurethane 3D printed in four infill patterns for
plasma-active antimicrobial surfaces. Current Opinion in comfort applications. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 27(11):
Chemical Engineering, 36:100764. 24-36.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2021.100764 https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-07-2020-0155
Ma YM, Gao L, Tian YQ, et al., 2021. Advanced biomaterials Nickkholgh B, Hickerson DHM, Wilkins C, et al., 2022. Re‐
in cell preservation: hypothermic preservation and cryo‐ generative medicine: the newest cellular therapy. In: Gee
preservation. Acta Biomaterialia, 131:97-116. AP (Ed.), Cell Therapy. Springer, Cham, Germany, p.517-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.07.001 537.
Mahmood RI, Kadhim AA, Ibraheem S, et al., 2022. Biosyn‐ https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75537-9_33
thesis of copper oxide nanoparticles mediated Annona mu‐ Noori AS, Mageed NF, Abdalameer NK, et al., 2022. The his‐
ricata as cytotoxic and apoptosis inducer factor in breast tological effect of activated Aloe Vera extract by micro‐
cancer cell lines. Scientific Reports, 12(1):16165. wave plasma on wound healing. Chemical Physics Letters,
https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-022-20360-Y 807:140112.
Mohammed MKA, Ahmed DS, Mohammad MR, 2019. Study‐ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2022.140112
ing antimicrobial activity of carbon nanotubes decorated Nouri A, Shirvan AR, Li YC, et al., 2021. Additive manufac‐
with metal-doped ZnO hybrid materials. Materials Re‐ turing of metallic and polymeric load-bearing biomateri‐
search Express, 6(5):055404. als using laser powder bed fusion: a review. Journal of
https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab0687 Materials Science & Technology, 94:196-215.
Mohammed MKA, Mohammad MR, Jabir MS, et al., 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2021.03.058
Functionalization, characterization, and antibacterial ac‐ Park KM, Min KS, Roh YS, 2022. Design optimization of lat‐
tivity of single wall and multi wall carbon nanotubes. IOP tice structures under compression: study of unit cell types
Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, and cell arrangements. Materials, 15(1):97.
757:012028. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010097
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/757/1/012028 Park SY, Yun YH, Park BJ, et al., 2022. Fabrication and biologi‐
Momin M, Mishra V, Gharat S, et al., 2021. Recent advance‐ cal activities of plasmid DNA gene carrier nanoparticles
ments in cellulose-based biomaterials for management of based on biodegradable L-tyrosine polyurethane. Phar‐
infected wounds. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 18(11): maceuticals, 15(1):17.
1741-1760. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15010017
J Zhejiang Univ-Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng) 2023 24(11):1027-1042 | 1041
Qin LD, Yao S, Zhao JX, et al., 2021. Review on development reinforced with 3D-printed polylactic acid lattice struc‐
and dental applications of polyetheretherketone-based tures. Composite Structures, 279:114866.
biomaterials and restorations. Materials, 14(2):408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114866
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14020408 Thrivikraman G, Madras G, Basu B, 2014. In vitro/in vivo as‐
Rahmati M, Silva EA, Reseland JE, et al., 2020. Biological sessment and mechanisms of toxicity of bioceramic ma‐
responses to physicochemical properties of biomaterial terials and its wear particulates. RSC Advances, 4(25):
surface. Chemical Society Reviews, 49(15):5178-5224. 12763-12781.
https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CS00103A https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA44483J
Rashid T, Sher F, Khan AS, et al., 2021. Effect of protic ionic Vakil MK, Mansoori Y, Al-Awsi GRL, et al., 2022. Individual
liquid treatment on the pyrolysis products of lignin ex‐ genetic variability mainly of proinflammatory cytokines,
tracted from oil palm biomass. Fuel, 291:120133. cytokine receptors, and toll-like receptors dictates patho‐
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120133 physiology of COVID-19 disease. Journal of Medical Vi‐
Roach DJ, Rohskopf A, Hamel CM, et al., 2021. Utilizing rology, 94(9):4088-4096.
computer vision and artificial intelligence algorithms to https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27849
predict and design the mechanical compression response Wan MC, Qin W, Lei C, et al., 2021. Biomaterials from the
of direct ink write 3D printed foam replacement struc‐ sea: future building blocks for biomedical applications.
tures. Additive Manufacturing, 41:101950. Bioactive Materials, 6(12):4255-4285.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2021.101950 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.04.028
Saadatmand M, Al-Awsi GRL, Alanazi AD, et al., 2021. Wang F, Guo CC, Yang QQ, et al., 2021. Protein composites
Green synthesis of zinc nanoparticles using Lavandula from silkworm cocoons as versatile biomaterials. Acta Bio‐
angustifolia Vera. Extract by microwave method and its materialia, 121:180-192.
prophylactic effects on Toxoplasma gondii infection. Saudi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.037
Journal of Biological Sciences, 28(11):6454-6460. Wang Y, Huang Y, Bai HY, et al., 2021. Biocompatible and
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.07.007 biodegradable polymer optical fiber for biomedical ap‐
Sadowska JM, Genoud KJ, Kelly DJ, et al., 2021. Bone bio‐ plication: a review. Biosensors, 11(12):472.
materials for overcoming antimicrobial resistance: ad‐ https://doi.org/10.3390/bios11120472
vances in non-antibiotic antimicrobial approaches for re‐ Wang YM, Liu P, Zhang GF, et al., 2021. Cascading of engi‐
generation of infected osseous tissue. Materials Today, 46: neered bioenergy plants and fungi sustainable for low-
136-154. cost bioethanol and high-value biomaterials under green-
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATTOD.2020.12.018 like biomass processing. Renewable and Sustainable En‐
Salihu R, Abd Razak SI, Zawawi NA, et al., 2021. Citric acid: ergy Reviews, 137:110586.
a green cross-linker of biomaterials for biomedical appli‐ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110586
cations. European Polymer Journal, 146:110271. Wilfred O, Tai HY, Marriott R, et al., 2018. Biodegradation of
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2021.110271 polyactic acid and starch composites in compost and soil.
Saydé T, El Hamoui O, Alies B, et al., 2021. Biomaterials for International Journal of Nano Research, 1(2):1-11.
three-dimensional cell culture: from applications in on‐ Wu S, Hu WQ, Ze QJ, et al., 2020. Multifunctional magnetic
cology to nanotechnology. Nanomaterials, 11(2):481. soft composites: a review. Multifunctional Materials, 3(4):
https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11020481 042003.
Sivasankarapillai VS, Das SS, Sabir F, et al., 2021. Progress https://doi.org/10.1088/2399-7532/abcb0c
in natural polymer engineered biomaterials for transder‐ Xiang Y, Jin RR, Zhang Y, et al., 2021. Foldable glistening-
mal drug delivery systems. Materials Today Chemistry, free acrylic intraocular lens biomaterials with dual-side
19:100382. heterogeneous surface modification for postoperative en‐
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100382 dophthalmitis and posterior capsule opacification pro‐
Suvindran N, Servati A, Servati P, 2022. Emerging biomedi‐ phylaxis. Biomacromolecules, 22(8):3510-3521.
cal and industrial applications of nanoporous materials. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.1c00582
In: Uthaman A, Thomas S, Li TD (Eds.), Advanced Func‐ Xu C, Wang DY, Zhang SW, et al., 2021. Effect of lignin
tional Porous Materials. Springer, Cham, Germany, p.353- modifier on engineering performance of bituminous binder
390. and mixture. Polymers, 13(7):1083.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85397-6_11 https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM13071083
Szczuka J, Sandomierski M, Buchwald T, 2022. Formation of Yeung DA, Kelly NH, 2021. The role of collagen-based bio‐
the octadecylphosphonic acid layer on the surface of materials in chronic wound healing and sports medicine
Ti6Al4V ELI titanium alloy and analysis using Raman applications. Bioengineering, 8(1):8.
spectroscopy. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8010008
Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 265:120368. Yilmaz B, Alshemary AZ, Evis Z, 2019. Co-doped hydroxy‐
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2021.120368 apatites as potential materials for biomedical applications.
Tao YB, Li P, Zhang HW, et al., 2022. Compression and Microchemical Journal, 144:443-453.
flexural properties of rigid polyurethane foam composites https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2018.10.007
1042 | J Zhejiang Univ-Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng) 2023 24(11):1027-1042