Wir

North - South Commuter Railway Extension
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
CP N-02 Request For Information Summary
As of 17 Sep 2024
No. Discipline & Code Subtotal
1 Architectural (A) 91
2 Civil Engineering (CE) 14
3 Construction (CN) 1
4 Geotechnical Engineering (GT) 1
5 Structural (ST) 802
6 Electrical (E.) 28
7 Mechanical (M) 14
8 Fire Protection (FP) 9
9 Sanitary (SN) 15
10 Drainage (RD) 22
11 Plumbing (PL) 2
Grand Total: 999
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
91 = Architectural (A) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List
Item Discipline Pier Location/Structure Document No. (RFI) Doc. Title Description Relevant Drawing (IFC)
(Civil/MEP/Archi)
1 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000001 Confirmation of New ROW at San Fernando Station Confirmation of New ROW at San Fernando Station and along Viaduct (P593- MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3021 Rev.31
and along Viaduct (P593-P600) P600)
Kindly refer to the attached drawings

1. MCRP-DWG-STA-GE-0013 Rev 30
1.MPFS and Electrical IFC Drawings for the General Station Garbage Building. 2. MCRP-DWG-STA-ME-0003 Rev 30
2 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000002 General Station Garbage Building- Unavailability of As per MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3705, The Architectural IFC drawing for the General 3. MCRP-DWG-STA-ME-6021 Rev 30
MPFS and Electrical Systems IFC Drawing Station Garbage Building was shown and detailed, but for the MPFS and 4. MCRP-DWG-STA-PL-6611 Rev 30
Electrical System, no available IFC drawings are provided. 5. MCRP-DWG-STA-SN-8021 Rev 30
6. MCRP-DWG-STA-FS-9021 Rev 30
7. MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5008 Rev 30
It was observed that there are no Floor Drains allocated on the Fire Exits 1-4
3 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000003 Missing Floor Drains on Fire Exits 1-4 Concourse Level Concourse Level at San Fernando Station. Since our External Wall is Perforated MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3406, MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6106
at San Fernando Station GFRC Panels, chance of Rainwater penetrations is high and will cause possible
water ponding.
4 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000004 Discrepancies of Architectural Details of Pedestals at It was observed that there are discrepancies of details for Pedestal at GF San MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3401, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3531,
GF San Fernando Station Fernando Station. MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3533
5 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000005 Support Details of Gutter Trench on Station Plaza 1 Please provide support details of Gutter Trench on Station Plaza 1 and Concourse MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3402, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404,
and Concourse Levels Levels at San Fernando Station. MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3411, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501
6 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000006 Confirmation of Floor Hatch Allocations on Station Please confirm Floor Hatch allocations on Station Plaza Level. Thus, below grade MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3402, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3411,
Plaza Level at San Fernando Station will be backfilled materials and any floor access will be not functional. MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3572, MCRP-SFD-ST-4121, 4212 and 4213
1. Please confirm allocation of Trench Drain on Ramp – TD shows on

7 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000007 Confirmation of Trench Drains on Ramp and Public Architectural Drawing before the Ramp-Up but not on the Sanitary Drawing. MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3402 to 3403, MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6104
Toilets at GF San Fernando Station 2. Please confirm allocation of Trench Drain on Public Toilets – TD shows on
Architectural Drawing before the Public Toilets but not on the Sanitary Drawing
It was observed that there are discrepancies of the Insulation Material along the
8 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000008 Confirmation of Insulation Material along the Precast Precast Concrete Panels. MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3503, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3412
Concrete Panels at San Fernando Station As per MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3503: “NON-COMBUSTIBLE POLYURETHANE FOAM
INSULATION”
In reference to MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3431_Rev.D San Fernando Station Reflected

ceiling plan Sheet 1; We would like to inquire on assigned catwalk for domestic
9 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000009 Details of Catwalk at San Fernando Station fire and water tank room. Based on our sections, blow up details and NSCR- MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3431_[D]; MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3453_[B];
ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000021 cat walk was not shown which did not aligned MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3422_[B]
with our reflected ceiling plan layout.
10 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000010 Confirmation of Floor Finishes on AFC UPS and AFC As seen on the MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501, AFC UPS and AFC Room marked as MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3405
Room at San Fernando Station F04-A (300 mm High Raised Access Floor System with 600 x 600 mm Panels)
11 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000011 TMRS Specification in SFD Station – Alternative Coating Proposal Approval for the Alternative TiO2 Coating of Fabric Material No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Proposal
12 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000012 Details of Door Type – D8, Louver with Fire Damper at As per MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3561, it was observed that a Fire Damper was MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3561, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5511~14
San Fernando Station incorporated within the Louver of Door Type-D8. Upon verifying to Mechanical
Drawings and Specifications, there was no details for this provision.
As per MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3701, MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3501, MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-

3501, MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3501, showing ROOF DECK DRAIN DETAIL, Typical for
all Ancillary Buildings.
13 Architectural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000013 Confirmation of Waterproofing Membrane Material 1. Floor Finishing with Waterproofing Membrane + 50 mm thick Rigid Insulation MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3701, MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3501,
and Details on Roof Slab at Ancillary Buildings + Cement Mortar Topping with Wire Mesh MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3501, MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3501
2. Parapet Wall Finishing, at internal wall face with waterproofing membrane
extended on top and external wall face with Elastomeric Waterproofing Paint on
Plaster
2 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
(Civil/MEP/Archi)
14 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000014 Detail of Wall Type (W0-B-2) for Blower Room 103 at Upon reviewing SFD-AR-3403 it was noticed that there is a Wall Type W0-B-2 at MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3403,
San Fernando Station the Ground level particularly the Blower Room 103. Thus, when checking for MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3503~3504
details at STA-AR-3503~3504 there was no information regarding the wall type.
We refer to the Wall Type on Fire & Domestic Water Tank, Blower Rooms, and
15 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000015 Detail of Wall Finishes on Fire and Domestic Water Public Toilets. As per MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3403, perimeter wall type code of MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3403, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3503
Tank and Blower Rooms at San Fernando Station W01-A (see Figure 1) and having a detail of Precast Concrete Wall Panels Paint
Finish as per MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3503 (see Figure 2).
Upon reviewing the Reflected Ceiling Plans on the Architectural Drawings of each MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3707 rev.30, MCRP-DWG-STA-EL-5400 rev.30
of the Ancillary Buildings, we have noticed a difference on the Lighting Layout MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3702 rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5920 rev.30
16 Architectural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000016 Confirmation of Lighting Layout on Ground Floor at compared from its respective Electrical Drawings. Please see below typical MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3101 & 3104 rev.30, MCRP-DWG-BP-EL-5252 rev.30
Ancillary Buildings lighting layout on Architectural Drawings (Figure 1) against Electrical Drawings MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3101 rev.30, MCRP-DWG-PSS-EL-5252 & 5253 rev.30
(Figure 2) MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3101 rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SIG-EL-5252 rev.30
Confirmation of Trench Drain and Oil Separator on Upon comparing the Architectural Plans and Sanitary Plans of Garbage Building,
17 Architectural Garbage Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000017 it was observed that there are Trench Drain and Oil Separator shown on Sanitary MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3705, MCRP-DWG-STA-SN-8021
Garbage Building at San Fernando Station
(see Figure 1) but not reflected on the Architectural (see Figure 2)
Upon reviewing the Roof Plans on the Architectural Drawings of each of the
Ancillary Building, we have noticed a difference on the Quantity and layout of MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3702, MCRP-DWG-STA-SN-6111
18 Architectural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000018 Confirmation of Layout of Roof Drains at Ancillary Roof Drains compared from its respective Sanitary Drawings. Please see below MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3101, MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3104
Buildings typical Roof layout on Architectural Drawings (Figure 1) against Sanitary MCRP-DWG-BP-SN-6111, MCRP-DWG-BP-SN-6112
Drawings (Figure 2) MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3101, MCRP-DWG-PSS-SN-6111
Upon reviewing the Architectural Drawings of the Battery Post Building IFC Cad
Files, we have noticed that the SIZE of Columns is 600 x 600mm. Hence, as per MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3101 Rev.30,
19 Architectural Battery Post NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000019 Confirmation of Column Size at Battery Post Buildings latest Structural IFC Drawings issued thru NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000166 MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3104 Rev.30,
Type A and B – Battery Post, it was stated on the COLUMN Reinforcement Schedules MCRP-RFI-BP2-ST-4311
700x700mm (C1 for BP2-1 to BP2-3) and 750x750mm (C2 for BP2-4) respectively.
Upon reviewing the IFC Architectural Drawings of Battery Post Building BP2-4, we
have noticed that there are 12 Nos. structural columns along gridlines
X01-X06/Y01 and X01-X06/Y02. While as per latest IFC Structural Drawings
issued thru NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000166 – Battery Post Type B, there
20 Architectural Battery Post NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000020 Confirmation of Structural Columns Layout at Battery are 18 Nos. structural columns along gridlines X01-X06/Y01, X01-X06/Y02 and MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3104 rev.30,
Post Building BP2-4 (Type B) X01-X06/Y03. MCRP-RFI-BP2-ST-4102 rev.01
In addition, looking on the Architectural Drawing – Ground Floor Plan, the 1-pc
window (W/2) along Gridline X01/Y01-Y02 will be obstructed by a structural
column in case the latest IFC structural drawings will govern.
Upon reviewing the Ceiling Finish Type C05-A and Clear Height of Distribution
Board Room, Blower Room, Fire and Domestic Water Tank Room at San MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3431 Rev.32,
Fernando Station, we have noticed some discrepancies, as follows: MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3505 Rev.30,
21 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000021 Confirmation of Ceiling Finish Type C05-A and Height As per MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3431 Rev. 32 “Reflected Ceiling Plan”, Distribution MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3413 Rev.31,
Clearance at San Fernando Station Board Room, Blower Room and Fire/Domestic Water Tank Room having Ceiling MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3421 Rev.30,
Finish Type C05-A and clear height of 4000mm, 3000mm and 5200mm MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3422 Rev. 30
accordingly (see Figure 1) and as shown on the tabulation, Hatch Type is Code 05
– Exposed Structure with 100 mm Insulation (see Figure 2)
Upon reviewing the Ceiling Finish Type C07-A and Clear Height of Station Plaza 1,
we have noticed discrepancies on height clearance and details, as follows: MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3431 Rev.32,
22 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000022 Confirmation of C07-A and Height Clearance of Station As per MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3431 Rev. 32 “Reflected Ceiling Plan”, Station Plaza 1 MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3421 Rev.30,
Plaza 1 at SFD having Ceiling Finish Type C07-A and clear height of 2800mm (see Figure 1) and MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3411 Rev.30,
as shown detail per MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3505 Rev. 30, C07-A having Aluminum MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3505 Rev.30
Louvers with Hot Dip Galvanized Steel Support (see Figure 2)
3 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
(Civil/MEP/Archi)
In reference to material finish Insitu Terazzo; We would like to request further

details and type of finshed. Since the above materials will be used for station
23 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000023 Detail of Insitu Terrazzo Floor Finish (F07) at San floor and interior/exterior ID items. MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501_[C]; MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3533_[30]
Fernando Station Figure 1: Showing IFC drawing MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501_[C] General station
typical details-floor; Insitu terrazzo floor assignment at San Fernando station.
As per IFC Architectural Drawings MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3403 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG- MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501 Rev.30,

SFD-AR-3404 Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3405 Rev.31 and MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR- MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3403 Rev.30,
24 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000024 Detail of Ceramic Tile Floor Finish (F03) at San 3406 Rev.31, Floor Finish at Male/Female/Public/Multi-Purpose/Staff Toilets, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404 Rev.31,
Fernando Station Hallway 1 & 2, BFR Ante Room 1 & 2, Training Room, Maintenance Office, Janitor MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3405 Rev.31,
Storage, Staff Room, Station Office, First Aid Room, Safety Room, Security Room, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3406 Rev.31,
Station Manager’s Room is F03-A Ceramic Tiles, 9.5 mm Thk. (See Figure 1) MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3641 Rev.30
Upon reviewing the IFC Architectural Drawing MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3453 Rev.30

San Fernando Station Domestic and Fire Water Tank Room Blow-up Details, we
have noticed that the Fire Water Tank Dimensions and Volume are not
consistent. As per Floor Plan having 6.0m x 6.0m x 3.0m with 90 cum capacity
25 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000025 Confirmation of Fire Water Tank Dimensions and (see Figure 1), while Section-A having 7.0m x 6.0m x 3.0m and no specified MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3453 Rev.30,
Volume Capacity at San Fernando Station capacity (see Figure 2) and Section-B having 6.0m x 6.0m x 3.0m with 90cum MCRP-DWG-SFD-FS-6621 Rev.30
capacity (see Figure 3). Comparing to MCRP-DWG-SFD-FS-6621 Rev.30 San
Fernando Station Fire Systems – Pump Room Layout and Fire Reserved Details,
indicating Fire Water Tank Dimensions 7.0m x 6.0m x 3.0m with 120 cum
capacity (see Figure 4).
As we review the replied RFI with reference number NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-

RFI-M-000002 – Locations of Exhaust Air Grille, Exhaust Air Louver, and Intake Air
Confirmation of Ceiling Finish at Station Electrical, High Louver at Station Electrical Room, responded as: “Please remove the false MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3431 Rev.32,
26 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000026 Voltage Receiving Room & Distribution Board Room, ceiling, there are no C02-B for Electrical Room and Distribution Board Room”. MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3505 Rev.30,
San Fernando Station (See Figure 5) We have verified the latest IFC Architectural Drawings and as well MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5407~5408 Rev.30,
for the other trades – Electrical/Mechanical, this caused us the needs to further MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5002 Rev.30,
clarify the Ceiling Finishes of Station Electrical Room, High Voltage Receiving
Room and Distribution Board Room.
Upon reviewing the IFC Architectural Drawings (Figure 1) MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-

3408 rev.30, we have noticed that the Floor Finished is F06-Aw is identified as
27 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000027 Confirmation of Floor Finishing at Platform Level Room Granite (Juparana Colombo) Floor Tiles Burner finish (900x1200mm). Hence, also MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501 Rev.30,
301 & 302 San Fernando Station as per the same drawing number SFD-AR-3408, it was stated IN SITU TERRAZZO MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3408 Rev.30
Floor finish and identified at (Figure 2) MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501 rev.30.
As we have noticed on the provided Illustration of Track-to-Track Bond, there

28 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000028 Detail of Track-to-Track Bond at San Fernando Station were no provision of pipe sleeve/s along the GFRC and 2-lane Segment. And no No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
detailed elevation given. To the fact that the 150mm PVC conduit is placed
below the lowest point of structural steel I-Beam at Platform Level. (See Figure 1)
29 Architectural Battery Post NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000029 Detail of Wall Openings for Outdoor Equipments at We would like to clarify the response on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000029 No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Battery Posts BP2-1 to BP2-4 Rev.A,
As we review the Architectural Plans of Garbage Building, we have noticed that
30 Architectural Garbage Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000030 Detail of Fire Detection and Alarm System at Garbage there were series of FDAS equipments on the given Legend & Symbols but not MCRP-DWG-STA-FS-9021 Rev.30,
Building reflected on its Ceiling Plan (see Figure 1). While considering on its Fire MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3705 Rev.30
Protection Layout, only 2pcs Fire Extinguisher are shown (see Figure 2)
Upon reviewing the IFC Architectural Drawings MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3405 rev.31,

31 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000031 Confirmation of TVM Room 231 & 232 at Concourse we have noticed that the TVM 1 & TVM 2 is identify as Room 231 & 232. Hence, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3405 Rev.31,
Level San Fernando Station as per MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3031 Rev.30, it was not stated in the Schedule of MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3031 Rev.30
Area Estimation, or we may call it Room Schedule.
According to drawing reference MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404_[E] San Fernando

32 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000032 Confirmation of GFRC Details at San Fernando Station detailed Plan Sheet 4; along gridline X05-X06 portion of wall type W09-A is MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404_[E]
“GFRC removable hatch W2500mm x H3000mm (verify with E&M contractor)”.
We would like to clarify if our interpretation as shown in Figure 2 is correct.
4 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
(Civil/MEP/Archi)
Upon reviewing the IFC Architectural Drawings (Figure 1) MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-

3201 Rev.31, we have noticed in the “Symbol and Type of Materials” the PLANT
POT is mentioned Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) and have a dimension
33 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000033 Clarification details of Plant Pot GFRC at San Fernando of Ǿ2000, H=3000 and planted with AGAVE shrubs. Thus, on the same IFC MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-302 1 Rev.31
Station drawings there is no drawing detail provided for the subject. On the other hand,
for comparison in the ARCHITECTURAL SPECS 501.5 it was not stated/ mentioned
on the category of the (GFRC) Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete item.
As commented on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000034 Rev.A (See Figure 1), to

Deletion of Suspended Metal Ceiling at San Fernando maintain the Suspended Metal Roofing and detailed on MCRP-DWG-STA-AR- MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3505 Rev.30,
34 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000034 MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3421 to 3423 Rev.30,
Station 3505 Rev.30 (See Figure 2), consist of main frame – St 75x45x15x2.3 @900,
supported on a 24mm dia rod to slab soffit and Glass Fiber Sheet t=5 MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3642 Rev.31
We would like to clarify the difference of Fencing Detail provided between the MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3703 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3501 Rev.B,
35 Architectural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000035 Fencing Detail at Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000035 Rev.A and NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A- MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3501 Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3501 Rev.C
000068 Rev.A. See below tabulation.
We would like to clarify the Detail of W02 – Wall Finishes

As per TS500 Section 541, W02 Wall is composed of Double Moisture Resistant MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3033 Rev.30,
Gypsum Board T=12.5 + T=9.5mm with Synthetic Resin Emulsion Paint with MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3503 Rev.30,
36 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000036 Clarification of W02 Wall Details at San Fernando Rockwool in-fill (See Figure 1). While on the IFC Drawings MCRP-DWG-STA-AR- MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404 Rev.31,
Station 3503 Rev.30, it is specified as Moisture Resistant Gypsum Boards 9.5mm + MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3405 Rev.31,
12.5mm but illustrated as 2-15.9mm + 9.5mm Gypsum Board for the 2-Hours MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3406 Rev.31
Fire Rating and 4-12.7mm + 9.5mm Gypsum Board for the 4-Hours Fire Rating
(See Figure 2).
We would like to clarify the Detail of W03 – Wall Finishes, for BFR Ante Room, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3033 Rev.30,
Staff’s Male & Female Toilets and Station Manager’s Room. MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3503 Rev.30,
37 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000037 Clarification of W03 Wall Details at San Fernando As shown on Figure 1 and Figure 2 snapshots on Detailed Plans, ideally the MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404 Rev.31,
Station thickness of wall with W03 is 108mm, but upon comparing from the Details MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3405 Rev.31,
provided on MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3503 Rev.30 (See Figure 3), the plan thickness MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3406 Rev.31
is not achievable.
Upon reviewing the IFC Architectural Drawings (Figure 1.a) MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-

3402 Rev.30, (Figure 1.b) MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR- 3403 Rev.30, (Figure 1.c) MCRP-
DWG-STA-AR- 3501 Rev.31. we have noticed in the Floor plan that Grating is MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3402~3403 Rev.30,
38 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000038 Clarification of Trench Grating at Stairs on Station called out W=75mm. Thus, on the other hand, for comparison in the (Figure 2.a) MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3501 Rev.30,
Plaza 1 MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6011 Rev.30 it was seen that on the Typical details of MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6011~6104 Rev.30
Sanitary the Grating has a W=300mm. Also shown (Figure 2.b) MCRP-DWG-SFD-
SN-6104 Rev.30 Ǿ100mm drainpipe.
In reference to RFI, NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000039 Confirmation of GFRC

39 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000039 Confirmation of GFRC Paint Type and Colour Finish Paint Type and Colour Finish Rev. A response, we would like to seek confirmation No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
on items 1 and 2.
MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3503 Rev.30,
We would like to request further Detail of W10 – Wall Finishes, W10 as detailed MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3510 Rev.30,
40 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000040 Clarification of W10 Wall Details at San Fernando on MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3503 Rev.30, Aluminum Expanded Metal with Steel MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3535 Rev.30,
Station Framing and Fluororesin Paint Finish (See Figure 1). And corresponds on TS 500 MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3401 Rev.30,
Section 506 (See Figure 2). MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3403 Rev.30
We would like to clarify the response on the NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-

000041 Rev.A and Rev.B.
1. As confirmed on the Rev.A, W01 (Precast Concrete Wall Panels) will be used as
indicated on IFC Drawings and not as Composite Precast Concrete Wall Panels. MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3503 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3504 Rev.31,
41 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000041 Clarification of Composite Precast Concrete Wall Hence, on the Rev.B, it was replied to use referring to TS501 which is a MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3412 Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3201-3202 Rev.31,
Panels Details at San Fernando Station Composite Building System/Composite Precast Concrete. The 2 definitions differ MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3401-3409 Rev.30
in terms of material composition.
2. As replied on Rev.B, mock-up sample is not needed and this is noted. Hence,
the query regarding the Warranty was not answered.
As commented on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000042 Paint Finishes at MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3103 Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3601 Rev.31,

42 Architectural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000042 Paint Finishes at Ancillary Buildings Ancillary Buildings Rev. B. ADJV would like to recommend equivalent colour MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3103 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3601 Rev.30,
according to our supplier (BOYSEN) colour palette; Also sending with this RFI is MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3103 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3601 Rev.30,
our supplier’s colour palette for engineer’s final selection. MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3106 Rev.30
5 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
(Civil/MEP/Archi)
Upon reviewing the IFC Drawings (Figure 1) MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404 Rev.31

and (Figure 2) MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4202 Rev.30., having the Layout Services (See
Female Toilet (Room 219) Waste Pipeline Clashes at Figure 3). We have noticed the following discrepancies: MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3642 Rev.30,
43 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000043 Structural Element and Toilet Accessories Mounting 1. The waste pipeline for the water closet along gridline X04 is clashing into the MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404 Rev.31;
Details on Stainless Steel Wall Partition at San structural steel (as highlighted on respective Figures 1 & 2). MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4202 Rev.30
Fernando Station 2. There is no mounting details for the Toilet Accessories (Toilet Paper Holder,
Grab Bar, Toddler Dressing Table, Baby Seat) to the Stainless-Steel Toilet
Partition.
We would like to clarify the Detail of W07 – Wall Finishes: As per TS500 Section MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3033 Rev.30,
541 Drywall Board System, W07 Wall Type describes as T=4mm Fiber Reinforced MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3503 Rev.30,
44 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000044 Clarification of W07 Wall Details at San Fernando Resin Mortar Fluororesin Paint Finish on 12mm + 12mm Calcium Silicate Panels MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404 Rev.31,
Station including 100x50x2.3mm Steel Channel Stud and furring with insulation in-fill MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3405 Rev.31,
(See Figure 1) MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3406 Rev.31
As commented on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000045 Rev.B, outdoor

perimeter floor finished of all Substations and Battery Posts Buildings is Gravel MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3701 Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-S/A2-AR-3031 Rev.33,
45 Architectural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000045 Confirmation of Floor Finish along Site Development at Wash-out + Concrete Paver; for SIG/COM, Genset, ISER2 & ISER3 to be retained MCRP-DWG-S/A3-AR-3031 Rev.32, MCRP-DWG-A/S1-AR-3031 Rev.32,
Ancillary Buildings as Concrete Pavement and demarcation of respective buildings was provided MCRP-DWG-A/S2-AR-3031 Rev.32, MCRP-DWG-S/A-AR-3041 Rev.32,
(See Figures 1 and 2). MCRP-DWG-A/S-AR-3041 Rev.31
In reference to the given Concourse Level Ceiling Faming Plan on MCRP-DWG-

Ceiling Framing along below Viaduct Segment on SFD-AR-3432 Rev.30 (See Figure 1), and as per our interpretation, the vertical MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3421 Rev.30,
46 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000046
Concourse at San Fernando Station supports as reflected on MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3421 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR- MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3422 Rev.30,
3422 Rev.30 (See Figure 2 and 3) MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3432 Rev.30
We would like to clarify the classification of Pay Items for Wall Finishes W03,
47 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000047 Clarification of Wall Finishes with Tiles at San W04, W05 and W12. MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3503 - 3504 Rev.30
Fernando Station As below tabulated, showing the Wall Finish Types with their corresponding Pay
Item Nos.
Upon superimposing the above ceiling utilities on Concourse, we have identified MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3421 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3422 Rev.30,
48 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000048 Combined Services on Concourse at San Fernando some clashing to the below portion of Viaduct Segment. As shown on detailed MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3423 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3431 Rev.32,
Station elevation, we are having a 400mm gap from the Ceiling Finishes upto the below MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5203 Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5611 Rev.30,
Viaduct Segment (See Figure 1). MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5641 Rev.30,
As the Engineer provided details of the Emergency Stop Switch (ESS) at Platform
and SCR Room emailed last August 26, 2022 (See Figure 1), we have observed
49 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000049 Confirmation of Latest IFC Architectural Drawings of that the attached drawing used does not corresponds to the IFC Drawing MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3102 Rev. 31,
San Fernando Station currently on hand. Attached on mail notes MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3102 as Revision MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404 to 3406 Rev. 31
C dated May 2022 while the latest IFC Drawing available is Revision 31 dated
March 2021.
We would like to clarify the Parapet Wall Details on roof deck at Ancillary
Buildings. As commented on the DRCs of Substations SS15 and SS17 with MCRP-DWG-SS15-ST-4201 Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-SS17-ST-4201 Rev.B,
reference DRC-A-000004 Rev.A and DRC-A-000003 Rev.B respectively, new MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3102 Rev.C, MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3108 Rev.A,
50 Architectural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000050 Clarification of Parapet Wall Details on Roof Deck at Parapet Wall detail will have a minimum height of 555 mm from Roof Deck MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4201 Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3102 Rev.B,
Ancillary Buildings Structural Slab and maximum height of 630mm considering the 1.5% slope of the MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3105 Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-ISER2-ST-4201 Rev.B,
mortar topping and as noted to be adopted for all Ancillary Buildings. (See Figure MCRP-DWG-ISER3-ST-4201 Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3102 Rev.B,
1). MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3105 Rev.A, MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3501 Rev.B
51 Architectural Battery Post NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000051 Building Coordinates at Battery Post BP2-1 to BP2-3 As commented on the NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000051 Rev.B, Staircases MCRP-DWG-S/A-AR-3051 Rev.D,
should have 1.4-meter width (See Figure 1). MCRP-RFI-BP2-ST-4311 Rev.01
Upon reviewing the co-relation of Building and Maintenance Road Alignment, we
have noticed that the Access Steel Gate at Substation SS16, once opened, will
52 Architectural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000052 Substation SS16 Access Steel Gate obstruct access along the Maintenance Road. In addition, the ramp down MCRP-DWG-VIA02-RD-2036 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-A/S1-AR/3031 Rev.D
requirement from the SS16 perimeter to the road will be insufficient, exposed
and making road’s clear width to be reduced.
Upon reviewing the co-relation of Building and Maintenance Road Alignment, we

have noticed that the Access Steel Gate at Signaling House ISER3 will not be
passable to vehicles. Considering the required ramp span due to difference of
53 Architectural Signaling House ISER3 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000053 Signaling House ISER3 Access Steel Gate elevation, ramp down will make it exposed to maintenance road and if ramp up, MCRP-DWG-VIA02-RD-2036 Rev.30,
transition will consume a bigger space inside the area. With this regard, we MCRP-DWG-A/S-AR-3041 Rev.C
would like to recommend relocating the access steel gate perpendicular to the
maintenance road along P-792 (See Figure 1).
6 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
(Civil/MEP/Archi)
Upon reviewing the co-relation of Building and Maintenance Road, we have

noticed some discrepancies at Battery Post BP2-2 and BP2-3. As follows: (See
Figure 1).
54 Architectural Battery Post NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000054 Battery Post BP2-2 and BP2-3 Fence Layout 1. BP2-2 and BP2-3 perimeter fence encroached the Barangay Road/Balut Street. MCRP-DWG-VIA02-RD-2036 Rev.30,
2. Maintenance Road Access Steel Gate clashed with BP2-2 and BP2-3 Perimeter MCRP-DWG-S/A-AR-3051 Rev.D
fence.
3. ROW Fence Line encroached the BP2-2 and BP2-3 Perimeter and will block the
access going to respective buildings.
We have noticed a discrepancy between the Battery Post BP2-4 IFC Structural
and Architectural Drawings, as follows: MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3104 Rev.B,
55 Architectural Battery Post NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000055 Building Coordinates at Battery Post BP2-4 1. Columns Orientation differs from Structural to Architectural (See Figure 1 and MCRP-DWG-S/A-AR-3051 Rev.D,
2 respectively). Figure 1 Columns Orientation as per IFC Structural Drawings – MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4102 Rev.A
center of columns are located on the intersection of X and Y axis/gridlines.
As commented on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000056 Rev.A, item IV (See

Figure 1). Figure 1; IV. For Dry Wall Partition Framing Supports. Please confirm: a. MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3503_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3401-3403_Rev.30,
56 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000056 Dry Wall Partition Details at San Fernando Station StC 100x50x2.3, 0.5mm thick - for vertical and horizontal supports is applicable MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404_Rev.C, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3405_Rev.32,
with W02, W03 and W04. if not, please provide Details. - please confirm the MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3406_Rev.C, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3407-3409_Rev.30,
Vertical and horizontal support system from the supplier / specialist, check their
recommendations.
Upon reviewing the IFC Architectural Drawings MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3104 Rev.B,

(Figure 1.a) Floor finishing on the Equipment room is Epoxy Coating and on the MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3104 Rev.B,
57 Architectural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000057 Floor Finish Termination at Ancillary Buildings stair platform is only Cast- In broom finish and identify as a (2) element finishing. MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3106 Rev.B,
MCRP-DWG-BP-AR- 3106 Rev.B, (Figure 1.b). As per IFC threshold is not indicated MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3106 Rev.C,
in the design of D5 Door type. MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3601 Rev.B
As responded on the NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000058 Rev.A (See Figure 1)

and discussed during the ADJV-GCR Technical Coordination Meeting held last
58 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000058 Galvanized Steel Grating along Perimeter with GFRC + March 3, 2023, please provide support details for the Galvanized Steel Grating MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404 to 3406 Rev.C,
Secondary Walls (W01&W06) along Perimeters of Concourse (Gridlines Y02/X02-X18 & Y01/X02-X18) and MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3411 Rev.31
Ground Floor (Gridlines Y02/X07-X15) Levels.
We would like to request the confirmation of the recent discussion during the
ADJV-GCR Architectural Coordination Meeting held last February 15, 2024,
regarding the Paint Application on Starter Column. As discussed, Starter Column
embedded in concrete will be Primer painted and the exposed portion with 3-
59 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000059 Paint System on Structural Steel Members at San Coat Paint System will be extended into the initial 300mm depth of concrete MCRP-DWG-STA-ST-4003_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-STA-ST-4031_Rev.30,
Fernando Station encasement (See Figure 1). Thus as of the moment, we are considering the MCRP-DWG-STA-ST-4032_Rev.30
works as per the response in NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000059 Rev.C (See
Figure 2). So that we can properly inform our subcontractor on how to proceed
the works.
As commented on the following DRC Nos. A-000012 and A-000011 for BP2-3 and MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3702_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3101_Rev.B,
BP2-4 respectively, windows will be omitted to consider safety and security as it MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3104_Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3601_Rev.B,
60 Architectural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000060 Omission of Windows at Ancillary Buildings also noting this will be applicable to SIG/COM/ELECTRIC HSE Building, Signaling MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3101_Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3104_Rev.A,
House ISER2 & ISER3, Substations SS14-SS17 and the remaining BP2-1 and BP2-2 MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3601_Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3101_Rev.C,
(See Figure 1). MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3107_Rev.A, MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3601_Rev.C
61 Architectural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000061 Trench Layout at Ancillary Buildings As commented on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000061 Rev.A, request as per NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000061 Rev.A, B and C
priority.
As indicated on Detailed Plan, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3405_Rev.32, AFC Room, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3405_Rev.32, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501_Rev.31,

62 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000062 Details of F04 Floor Finish at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501-3031_Rev.31,
Customer Service 1 and 2 will have F04 Floor Finish Type (See Figure 1 and 2).
MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3411_Rev.31
We would like to request for clarification on the water repellent application

63 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000063 Semi-Transparent Water Repellent Application coverage; Based on our IFC drawing and detail, viaduct columns and segments MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3505 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3411 Rev.31
Coverage on Viaduct at San Fernando Station has applied semi repellent finish. However, for viaduct columns and segments MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3402 Rev.30; MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3406 Rev.C
outside the station we are unable to find data on type of applied finish.
7 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
(Civil/MEP/Archi)
We would like to request for further clarification in reference to NSCR-ADJV-

Clarification on Station Material and Finishes Report N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000064 response against IFC Rev Set 18. NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000064
64 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000064 MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3033_[30], MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501_[C]
VS IFC Rev. Set 17 at San Fernando Station Figure 1: Extracted from NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000064 GCR response
for stainless steel column skirting (in yellow). MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3445 [30], MCRP-DWG-STA-3531 rev. B
We would like to clarify the layering sequence of Honed Granite Floor Tile Floor
Finish (F06). As per the IFC-STA Architectural Drawing detailed on MCRP-DWG-
STA-AR-3501 Rev.31 (See Figure 1), this consists of 3 layers – Levelling Mortar
65 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000065 Detail of Honed Granite Floor Tile Floor Finish (F06) at Bed 14mm, Adhesive 6mm, Honed Granite Floor Tile 30mm. However, on MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3407 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3408 Rev.30
San Fernando Station standard actual installation of Granite Floor Tiles, it only has 2 layers – Mortar MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3409 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501 Rev.31
Bed 20mm, Granite Floor Tile 30mm (See Figure 2). If following the specified on
IFC-STA Architectural detail, ADJV’s concern is that the 14mm Levelling Mortar
Bed has higher possibility of failing/having cracks/having hollow sound.
According to MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3052_Rev.D San Fernando Station Fire

Compartmentation Plan Sheet 2; Station Electrical Room and High Voltage
Receiving Room on Concourse Level is under 4-hours fire resistance rating
Clarification on 4-Hour Fire Rating Coverage at San (wall/column), See Figure 1. We would like to clarify if this 4-hours fire rating
66 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000066 also applies to the Girders & Beams/steel structure and slab soffit of Platform MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3052_[D]; MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3431_[D]
Fernando Station
Level which will pass through this area. Since the above-mentioned rooms will be
having no false ceiling as confirmed thru NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000026,
Confirmation of Ceiling Finish at Station Electrical, High Voltage Receiving Room
& Distribution Board Room at San Fernando Station (See Figure 2).
In reference to MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3641_Rev.30 and MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-

3642_Rev.C Station Schedule of waterproofing; We have noticed that areas
67 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000067 Clarification on Architectural Waterproofing marked with waterproofing apllication on wall may be redundant with assigned MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3641_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3642_Rev.C,
Application at San Fernando Station wall type since W01 and W09 has already applied water repellent. While some MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3503_Rev.30
areas with waterproofing application is unclear for specific element.
We would like to clarify the comments stated on NSCR-GCR-N02-CSFSTN-DRC-ST-

000084 of Shop Drawings for STRUCTURAL OF ISER2 BUILDING AND SUBSTATION
SS14 GATE & FENCE LAYOUT, as follows:
1. On Item No. 2, comment as ”There is a clashing between the gate entry and
the ISER2 Building. Kindly fix this issue” (See Figure 1).
68 Architectural Signaling House ISER2 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000068 Gate and Fence Details at Signaling House ISER2 - As shown on the IFC Drawing, Site Development of ISER2 (See Figure 2), the MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3502_Rev.A, MCRP-DWG-S/A-AR-3041_Rev.D,
gate swings outward and the ISER2 Building is within the Gate Opening Width
Limit approx 300mm.
-If you wish to swing the gate outward/inward and to prevent the clashing on
ISER2 building, the Gate Opening width must be atleast 4500mm instead of
5000mm (See Figure 3).
In reference to MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3021_Rev.D versus MCRP-DWG-SFD-DR-

69 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000069 Clarification on Site Development Plan at San 2003_Rev.30 and MCRP-DWG-SFD-CW-1011_Rev.30 Station site development MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3021_Rev.D; MCRP-DWG-SFD-DR-2003_[30];
Fernando Station plan; We have noticed that IFC drawing for architectural, mechanical and road MCRP-DWG-SFD-CW-1011_Rev.30
network lay out is not the same.
We would like to clarify the Steel Door Details as specified on the IFC Drawings. MCRP-DWG-PSS-BP-3601_Rev.C, MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3601_Rev.C,
70 Architectural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000070 Steel Door Details at Ancillary Buildings MCRP-DWG-PSS-BP-3601_Rev.C, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3702_Rev.B,
1. Fire Rating and Door Type – see tabulation.
MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3708_Rev.30
We would like clarify on Architectural IFC Sigcom building floor finished is Cinder
concrete ;However According to MEP IFC drawing MCRP-DWG-STA-ME-
71 Architectural Sig/Com NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000071 Floor Finish at Sig/Com/Railway Electrical House 5609_[30] airconditioning is under floor.Kindly see below figure 1 and 2 as MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3702_[B]; MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3703_[B];
reference. Figure 1. Showing drawing from MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3702 Rev.B and MCRP-DWG-STA-ME-5609_[30]
MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3703Rev.B San Fernando-Sig/Com/Railway Elec House Plan
and Section.
According to architectural MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3571_[B] and DRC comments

72 Architectural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000072 Stair Handrail Details at Ancillary Buildings hand rail outside diameter is 42.2mm. However according to our subcontractor MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3571_[B]
suppliers (See Figure 2 and figure 3) is the only available on market.
8 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
(Civil/MEP/Archi)
In reference to Architectural IFC MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3571_[B] General Station

73 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000073 MT-4 Gate and Fence Detail at San Fernando Station Metal Fabrication typical details sheet 2 (access ladder) Material finish is MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3405_[D]; MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3572_[30] ;
stainless steel; However based on Station Material & Finishes Report material MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3407_[C]
finish is fluroresin paint:grey-black colour code (RAL 9010) satin finish.
As commented on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000074 Clarification on

Location for STP and Adjacent Road Access at San Fernando Station Rev. A;
Please refer to proposed STP tank arrangement aligned with existing road access
74 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000074 Clarification on Location for STP and Adjacent Road lane as shown on Figure 2 in line with RFI response. Also we would like to MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3403_[B]; MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5608_[30];
Access at San Fernando Station propose for stp machine room to be located inside Station blower room as MCRP-DWG-STA-ME-6021_[30]
shown on figure 3 where waste water pump (PPC6-2) power provision is also
located as shown on Figure 4.
In reference to MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3501_[D] General Substation Details and

TS534 Finish hardware; Specified material for ancillary building stair nosing is 2”
cast iron abrasive. How ever during our Jan 18,2024 Inspection for Proposed
75 Architectural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000075 Stair Nosing at Ancillary Buildings ancillary final colour at ADJV Visaya meeting room; It was discussed with our GCR MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3501_[D], MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3501_[C],
representative the issue of cast iron abrasive availability on local market. As MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3501_[C]
mention we can follow N01 material for nosing which is termed as “pundido”
and sample photo was send through MS team for reference under Figure 2.
According to architectural IFC drawing MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3531_[B] and MCRP-

DWG-SFD-AR-3411_[B]; We have 200Ø x 2 stainless steel down spout inside the
ID-1 column but then upon checking with sanitary IFC drawing MCRP-DWG-SFD-
SN-6102_[30] only 1 no of 150mmØ downspout for each column. Also seperate
76 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000077 Downspout Provision Inside ID-1 Steel Column at San RFI was issued under sanitary related to this item NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI- MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3531_[B]; MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3411_[B];
Fernando Station SN-000012 -Downspout Orientations between Architectural IFC and Sanitary IFC MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3554_[30]; MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6102_[30]
Drawings on RoofPlatfrom Level at San Fernando Station (under review as of to-
date). We would like to request for guidance if this will be adequate for
stormwater on both sides of column base on our roof design as shown on figure
3.
Referring to IFC drawing MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404_[F] San Fernado Station

77 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000078 Storage 1 & 2 Door Provision Clashing with ESC Nos. 4 Detailed Plan Sheet 4 and its corresponding 3D model, Storage Room 1 door will MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404_[F]; MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3052_[E]
& 5 at San Fernando Station clash on ESC 4 and Storage Room 2 door will clash on ESC 5, as shown on Figures
3 and 4.
We would like to request for clarification regarding Station plaza Cable trench
Stainless steel cover; If the scope is under NS01 or ADJV additional works.
According to NSCR-GCR-NS01-N02-MTG-IM-000020 interface meeting and
78 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000079 Cable Trench Stainless Steel Cover at San Fernando NS01/CPn02 workshop meeting; Trench cover for Ancillary building and San MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501Rev.05; MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501_[D]
Station fernando station is under NS01 (please refer to figure 1&2). Also refering to
contract drawing MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501 trench detail was not shown;
however on latest IFC drawing trench detail was already included(please refer to
figure 3)
As discussed during the NS-01-ADJV Interface Meeting last March 12, 2024. NS-
01 have informed ADJV that the Trench and Wall Opening Layouts at the
Substations (SS14-SS17) and Signaling House (ISER2/ISER3) have been updated.
79 Architectural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000080 Confirmation of E&M Trench and Wall Opening As agreed, NS-01 will provide the updates for Substations SS14 & SS17 and No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Layouts at SS15, SS16 and ISER3 Signaling House ISER2 thru ADJV’s RFI - NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000076
Rev.A issued last February 12, 2024.
Hence, this RFI is issued to ask the Trench and Wall Opening Layouts Updates for
Substations SS15 & SS16 and Signaling House ISER3.
We would like to request for clarification on fire house cabinet on type ID-1
column at San Fernando Station; According to Architectural and Fire protection
80 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000081 Clarification on surface mounted Firehose cabinet IFC drawing as shown on figure 2 & 3. Installation height from finish floor line to MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501Rev.05; MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501_[D]
design at San Fernando Station bottom of fire hose cabinet is 900mm. However upon checking with our Station
Material & Finishes Report (as shown in figure 1) fire hose cabinet has been
modified and is flushed from finish floor line.
9 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
(Civil/MEP/Archi)
We would like to request for clarification on ISER 2 and 3 wall surface

81 Architectural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000082 Clarification on Unfilled Portion Underneath Stair at underneath the stair. According to architectural ifc drawing wall surface is MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3101_D; MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3103_D
ISER 2-3 Ancillary Building sealed; However upon checking with structural shop drawing portion
underneath stair is unfilled as shown on figure 2 and figure 3.
We would like to request for confirmation on wall details along type D1 door
82 Architectural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000083 Clarification on Blockworks Detail at Substation inside substation meeting room. As shown on figure 1 as reference for figure 2 No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Ancillary Building wall detail. Latest submission for blockworks is status NONO already however
site is requesting for additional detail for site reference during inspection.
As we have commenced the inter-coordination and Design Analysis with the San
Fernando Station’s subcontractor for the Tensile Membrane Roof Structure
(TMRS), some items were discussed for the enhancement of the PTFE Structure. MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3411_Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3412_Rev.31,
83 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000084 PTFE Roofing Details at San Fernando Station One of these is to remove the valley cables as shown on the IFC Architectural MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3413_Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3421_Rev.B,
Drawings (See Figures 1 and 2). This will improve significantly the aesthetics, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3422_Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3423_Rev.B,
function, serviceability and lifespan of the inverted conical PTFE membrane MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3501 to 3503_Rev.30
design.
MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3561_C; MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3562_[C];
We would like to request for clarification on steel doors at San fernando Station. MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3563_[C]; MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3564_[C];
84 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000085 Clarification on Schedule of Steel Door at San Based on below references; We have observed that finishes and details on these MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3565_[C]; MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3566_[30];
Fernando Station doors did not match with Station material & finshes report vs IFC door sched vs MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3567_A; MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3051_30;
IFC fire compartmentation plan and IFC section/blow up detail drawing. MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3052_E
In reference to architectural coordiantion meeting no.14 dated last april 19;

Under item no. 7 subject gender and developnment request for details on assign
85 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000086 Confirmation on Gender and Development Room at rooms. According to GCR representative gender and development rooms are MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404_[F]; MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3406_[F]
San Fernando Station multi-purpose toilet 1,2,3,4 and breast feeding room 1 (BFR 1) as shown on
figure 1. In this regard we would like to request for confirmation in line with our
architectural coordination meeting mom no.14
As coordinated the issue on the Precast Concrete Wall Panels along the Fire Exit
86 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000087 Precast Concrete Wall Details on Fire Exit Stair Nos. 1-4 Stair Nos. 1-4 during the previous ADJV-GCR Architectural Coordination Meeting. MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404 Rev.F, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3406 Rev.F,
at San Fernando Station We have highlighted the clashing of the PC Wall against the Steel Structure of MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3517 to 3518 Rev.30
the Fire Exit Stair Nos. 1-4 (See Figure 1/Plan and Figure 2/Typical Section).
As we are progressing the Combined Services Layout, we have noticed some

possible clash and mis-alignment between the riser-cable trays (from Concourse
87 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000088 Proposed Re-Alignment of 1-Side Wall Partition on Fire to Platform Level) against the slab opening provisions within the 1-Side Wall MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3407 Rev.D, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3409 Rev.D,
Exit / EPS Room 1 to 4 at San Fernando Station Partition of EPS Room 1 and typical to EPS Rooms 2, 3 & 4. See Figure 1 showing MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5204 Rev.30
the specific 1-Side Drywall Partition locations.
In reference to GCR/ADJV/EEI Platform check meeting dated last May 10,2024; It MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3002_[B]; MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3201_[31;
88 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000089 Clarification on Exposed Structural Steel at San was coordinated the we have observe protruding structural steel on the MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3202_[C]; MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3102_[F];
Fernando Station Facade southeast and northwest elevation as shown on figure 1 as per structural IFC but MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131_[B]; MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4141_[30]
upon checking with architectural IFC these protruding steel was not shown.
89 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000090 W01 Precast Concrete Wall Details at San Fernando We would like to clarify the required Surface Finish of the Precast Concrete Wall MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3503_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3403_[D];
Station Panels at San Fernando Station. Referring to TS406.2.5 Fabrication Item 3.C, it MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3503_[30]; MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3412_[31];
was categorized into 3 (See Figure 1). MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3413_[31]; MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3641_[30]
We would like to clarify regarding the application coverage of the Semi-

Transparent Water Repellent on the W01 Precast Concrete Wall at San Fernando
Station. As initial understanding, this will be applied only at the Exterior Face of MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3403_[D]; MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3503_[30];
90 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000091 Semi-Transparent Water Repellent Application on W01 the Panel, since the Interior Face will be having a Non-Combustible Polyurethane MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3412_[31]; MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3413_[31];
Precast Concrete Wall at San Fernando Station Foam Insulation and for the Panel Four Sides will be protected as the adjacent MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3641_[30]
panels in-between 25mm gap will be sealed (See Figure 1). This query was also
discussed during ADJV-GCR Architectural Coordination Meeting held last May
31/Friday.
91 Architectural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000092 Noise Reduction Coefficient Details at San Fernando NS01 have issued an RFI with reference number NSCR-MACC-NS01-IMN02-RFI-T- No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Station 000001 Rev.B, requesting the Noise Reduction Coeffiecient of the listed below
finishing materials. See Figure 1.
10 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
14 = Civil Engineering (CE) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List
(Civil/MEP/Archi)
1) In the attached drawing cross section does not specify the materials to be use MCRP-DWG-VIA02-RD-2003, MCRP-DWG-VIA02-RD-2004,
1 Civil All At-Grade Works NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-CE-000001 Details In The Edge of the Maintenance Road in the red box as shown. MCRP-DWG-VIA02-RD-2005, MCRP-DWG-VIA02-RD-2006,
Figure 1. Section views in MCRP-DWG-VIA02-RD-2003 to 2007A (IFC Drawing) MCRP-DWG-VIA02-RD-2007 and MCRP-DWG-VIA02-RD-2007A
2 Civil All At-Grade Works NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-CE-000002 Substructure Drainage Connection Detail The Contractor would like to ask for connection detail between vertical PVC dia. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0401, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0402
200mm drainage pipe and drainage channel concrete cover. MCRP-SK-VIA00-DR-0503, MCRP-SK-VIA00-DR-0504
3 Civil All Pier Heads NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-CE-000003 Pier Types for Bird Wire As per our understanding, Bird Wire shall be applying only in Pier Type 1 and MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0402
Type 2. For this matter, may we clarify if our understanding is correct.
As per our Drawing reference no. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1651, for the Concrete
Block Masonry in the staircase. Only Height of 3000mm is shown in the Figure 1.
4 Civil All Emergency Staircase NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-CE-000004 Concrete Block Masonry But the length is not shown in the said figure. Also, exact coordinates are not MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1651
given. In this case may we request the length of concrete block masonry and the
exact coordinates.
1) As per our BOQ only Aggregate Subbase Course in Station and Substation will
be used.
5 Civil San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-CE-000005 Hard Core Materials in San Fernando Station at Bottom 2) But in the drawing reference no. MCRP-SFD-ST-4306 as shown in the red box, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4306
of Pile Cap there is a 200mm thick hard core materials. In this matter may we clarify what
materials to be used.
1) As per Drawing 1, only the Finished Road Level are given, see red box below.
And as per Drawing 2, the finished ground levels are instructed at drainage
locations. However, there is no instruction at piers and other locations. For this
6 Civil All At-Grade Works NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-CE-000006 Finish Ground Elevation and Level of 30m width Right matter may we request the elevation of the finished ground level for whole MCRP-DWG-VIA02-RD-2015 to 2038, 2003 to 2007A,
of Way Limit MCRP CP N-02 project area. MCRP-DWG-VIA02-DR-0059 to 0104 and MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0080 to 0090
2) And may we ask for clarification in our understanding as shown in the Drawing
3 and Drawing 4 if the finished ground level is same level for the limit of our
project Right of Way except the area with maintenance road and drainage.
As per drawing reference MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0303 our drainage details for

Manhole connection, there are Manhole connection type 1A and type 1B see
7 Civil All Underground Works NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-CE-000007 Invert Elevation of Manhole for Type 1A and 1B below Drawing 1. If we are computing the invert elevation using given data of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0303 and MCRP-DWG-VIA02-DR-0059 to 0104
Connection FGE-t1-H and FGE-t1-D-0.3 there are two different invert elevations will come up
for the two-method using the data from table 1 below. For this matter may we
clarify which data will use for computing the Manhole Invert elevation.
1) As per drawing reference MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0303 and 0304 our drainage

details for Manhole connection, there are Manhole connection type 1A, type 1B,
type 1C, type 2A and type 2B. And for the drawing reference MCRP-DWG-VIA02-
8 Civil All Underground Works NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-CE-000008 Manhole Type Connection and Details of Manhole DR-0059 to 0104, for the Plan and Schedule of drainage for Manhole Connection MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0303, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0304,
Type 1C and Type 2A Connection type, the manhole details type are not match as per schedule. Please see table 1 MCRP-DWG-VIA02-DR-0059 to 0104
below for the connection type. For this matter, may we ask what type of
manhole connection to be use since the manhole connection details and
schedule are not match.
As per Technical Specification 206.7.6 Tests for Modulus of Elasticity, and Creep
9 Civil Creep and Shrinkage Tests NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-CE-000009 An Inquiry on Creep and Shrinkage Tests and Shrinkage Coefficients, Creep and Shrinkage Tests is required for use in No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
adjusting the design values and the related calculations of structural deflection
and geometry control.
Based on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-CE-000002 Engineer’s Response, the
drainage outlet channel (originally connected onto the pile cap) is now
disconnected to pile cap and should be of separate structure. In this regards, the
Request for Additional Information about Drainage Contractor kindly request the Engineer an additional information for the
10 Civil All Underground Works NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-CE-000010 following: MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1355 & 1356 (Rev.30)
Outlet Channel
1. Plan view showing pile cap, column, PVC pipe and concrete drainage channel.
2. Sections showing column, PVC pipe and new concrete drainage channel.
3. Elevation of concrete drainage channel.
4. Clarify the distance of the PVC pipe from the pier on the below figure.
As extracted from TS500 up to Add5 – Architectural, Section 523.2.3 Fabrication.

11 Civil San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-CE-000011 Details of Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Membrane May we request the Employer accept to relax the requirements for the No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Supplier at San Fernando Station manufacturer/supplier of PTFE? It is a bit difficult to find a
manufacturer/supplier of PTFE with a Twenty (20) years of solid background.
11 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
14 = Civil Engineering (CE) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List
(Civil/MEP/Archi)
Details on initial coating of all steel structural members:

1.1. Please verify “All steel structural members are applied hot dip galvanizing”
12 Civil San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-CE-000012 Details of Coatings for Steel Structural Members at San and provide further directions. MCRP-DWG-STA-ST-4003 , MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131, 4141 and 4151
Fernando Station - It is difficult to apply hot dip galvanizing to all steel structural members due to
massive sizes/dimensions.
There are some items in the Specifications that requires the Contractor to
provide detailed design of secondary elements. (e.g., PTFE, Escalators and
13 Civil San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-CE-000013 Request for Analysis Modelling and Design Report of Elevators, etc.). No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
San Fernando Station With regards to this, may we request the Analysis Model and Design
Report/Calculations to serve as guidance and leverage.
As observed in the MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3421, there are steel pipes for OCS

14 Civil San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-CE-000014 Details of Bolt Holes for Steel Pipes for OCS at San (Work by Others) that will be attached on the Station’s Steel Structure Elements MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3421
Fernando Station on the Roof Level. Please provide Setout Plan of the Bolt Holes needed so that
we can incorporate in our Steel Structure Shop Drawings.
12 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
1 = Construction (CN) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List
(Civil/MEP/Archi)
1. It is understood that a steel box girder will be installed above the Old San
Fernando Station (as shown below). In this regard, the Contractor would like to
1 Civil San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-CN-000001 Protection Plan of Old San Fernando Station ask if the protection plan should consider the case in which the steel box girder No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
will unfortunately fall to the old station during lifting operation.
2. If the mentioned case above will not be considered, the Contractor would like
to ask for the maximum weight/load the Protection Plan should carry.
13 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
1 = Geotechnical Engineering (GT) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List
(Civil/MEP/Archi)
According to the results of Crosshole Sonic Logging Test and the High Strain
Integrity Test carried out at P510-01, it’s clear that the said pile has some
1 Civil P510 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-GT-000001 Request for Information on Pile Design defects. With respect to this issue, the Contractor wants to refer the pile design MCRP-CAL-VIA-ST-012_R3, MCRP-CAL-VIA-ST-014_R3
to come up with a remedial plan as soon as possible. Thus, the Contractor would
like to ask if the Engineer can send pile design report to the Contractor.
14 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
802 = Structural (ST) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List
Discipline
Item (Civil/MEP/Archi) Pier Location/Structure Document No. (RFI) Doc. Title Description Relevant Drawing (IFC)
The drawings MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0032, MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0042 show

information in notes that steel grade 75 shall be used for bars dia. 32mm and
greater size in the BR105 supports.
MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0032, MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0042,
1 Structural Bridge 105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000001 BR105 (Extradosed Bridge Supports RC Steel Grade) NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000001. The drawing MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0341 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0341
and TS200 Chapter 207.2.1 inform about reinforcement steel grade 60 only.
Please clarify which reinforcement steel grade requirement the Contractor
should follow for BR105 (Extradosed bridge) supports.
On the IFC drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0324, there is a discrepancy in the

size of spiral rebar (P01) as below figure.
2 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000002 Size of Spiral Rebar Figure: A discrepancy in the size of spiral rebar (P01) MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0324
Thus, the Contractor would like to request to clarify what is a correct size of
spiral rebar (P01) between above sizes.
On the IFC drawing No. MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4531, MCRP-DWG-SS14-ST-4301,

MCRP-DWG-SS14-ST-4301, MCRP-DWG-SS15-ST-4301, MCRP-DWG-SS16-ST- MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4531, MCRP-DWG-SS14-ST-4301,
San Fernando Station 4301, MCRP-DWG-SS17-ST-4301, MCRP-DWG-ISER2-ST-4301, MCRP-DWG-ISER3- MCRP-DWG-SS14-ST-4301, MCRP-DWG-SS15-ST-4301,
3 Structural Substation NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000003 A Discrepancy in Bundle of Spiral Rebar ST-4301 and MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4301, there is a same discrepancy in Section 2 MCRP-DWG-SS16-ST-4301, MCRP-DWG-SS17-ST-4301,
ISER-2, ISER-3 regarding spiral rebar in common as shown in the below figure. MCRP-DWG-ISER2-ST-4301, MCRP-DWG-ISER3-ST-4301
Figure: A discrepancy in section 2 and MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4301
Please let us know whether the bundle is included in Section 2.
It is written in your response that “The design report or the modelling file of the
balanced cantilever and extradosed bridge may be able to provide to Contractor
for reference purpose only. The Contractor is solely responsible for the camber
calculation based on his method to construct the superstructure as specified and
required under the Contract.” It is understood and confirmed that the Contractor
Request for Modelling and design report of Balanced is solely responsible for the camber calculation based on our method to
4 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000004 Cantilever and Extradosed Bridge No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
construct the superstructure as specified and required under the Contract and
the information provided by the Engineer are surely for the reference purpose
only.
Please be noted that your assistance regarding this issue will greatly help the
Contractor to minimise the preparation time and expedite the documentations
to satisfy the Engineer fully. It is kindly requested to provide the above
The drawinginformation
mentioned No. MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0021
to the Contractor. notes that steel grade 75 shall be
used for bars dia. 32mm or greater size for the BR105 Piles.
Figure 1 : Reinforcing steel grade (MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0021) However,
Technical Specification (TS) 200 Chapter 207.2.1 defines the Contractor shall use
grade 60 for bars dia. 16 and above.
5 Structural Bridge 105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000005 RC Steel Grade for BR105 (Extradosed Bridge) Piles Figure 2 : Reinforcing steel grade (TS 207.2.1) There is a discrepancy between the MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0021
drawing and technical specification with reference to bar grade. Please clarify
which reinforcement steel grade requirement the Contractor should follow for
BR105 (Extradosed bridge) Bored Piles.
The Pier Schedule in drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST shows the Pier Type and
Pier Reinforcement Type. However, Rebar details of Pile for Pier type and MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0105, MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0109,
6 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000006 Request for Rebar Details of Pile reinforcement type of the Pier Numbers shown in the below table have been MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0110
omitted in the IFC Drawings.
Straight Extension in tension shall be at least 12𝑑𝑏 (Diameter of Bar) as shown

Referring to “ACI 318-19 Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete”,
MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0321~0324, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1653,
in the below table. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0341, MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2012,
7 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000007 Constraint on Construction of Pile However, when above criteria is applied to top of pile rebar according to pile MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4012, MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0033
detail in IFC drawings as below Figure 1, there seems to be a problem with
concrete work because there is no space for tremie pipe as shown in Figure 2.
1. Please let us know the size of the bearing plinth and it is kindly requested to
provide the reinforcement details for the bearing plinth. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0781 [Bearing Type1 Details]
8 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000008 Bearing Detail 2. It is understood that there are six types of bearings shown in BOQ for MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0101 and 105
Extradosed Bridge (from S1to S6), please provide us the type information for the MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0501 and 502
Extradosed Bridge Bearings.
The Contractor has received the Engineer’s Response to the RFI of the OCS pole
provision location (NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFRFI-QA-000008).
Geometry and Rebar for OCS Pole in Precast 1) There is a discrepancy between IFC drawings and ‘Pole and Guy Foundation
9 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000009 Segmental Bridge Diagram at Viaduct in the Engineer’s Response’ about thickness and shape of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1301, 1302, 0901
slab at the location of OCS pole. Please let us know which drawing should be
followed.
Details of Block Outs or Sleeve Passing Through the The Contractor has received the Engineer's Response to the RFI of the OCS pole
10 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000010 Segement provision location (NSCR-ADJV-N0S-CSFRFI-QA-000008). No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
15 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
Vertical height of the top blister is state as 540mm. But as shown in Figure 1, if
the angle of 17 degrees and distance from the CJ (100+175) are applied, ADJV
obtains 571.8 mm.
11 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000011 Blister Dimension Please clarify the dimensions of the top blister in T2, and provide the dimensions MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0992 rev30.
from the external edge of the segment (A in Figure 1) so that ADJV don’t have
mistakes on them.
Figure 1. Top blister dimension in MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0992 rev30.
1. Dimensons of internal wall In the connection geometry of the internal part

between segments T1M and A1, the limits of the dimensions are not clear in the
drawing MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0901 rev30. Please clarify dimensions of internal
12 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000012 Geometry Clarification of Precast Segment wall or, provide dwg or other file in order to assure dimensions of internal walls. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0901, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0062,
NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000012 Figure 1. Type A1 Segment Section 1 in MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0952 rev30
MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0901 rev30.
2. Proposal of inner geometry The below dimensions from drawings MCRP-DWG-
VIA00-ST-0952 rev 30, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0901 rev 30 (section 1) and MCRP-
DWG-VIA00-ST-0062 rev 30, are different on top inner corner.
The position of the bottom blister trumpet is marked as variable in the drawing
MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0991. However, the variable portions are not clearly
stated in this drawing. NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000013
Geometry Clarification of Bottom Blister and Web in Figure 1. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0991 As per ADJV’s understanding based on
13 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000013 Precast Segment drawing MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1132, the variable blister anchorage position shall MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0991, 1132
be on the web of 350mm (T1 segment, blisters & T2E, T1E, T3E) and on T1M it
shall be fixed at 620mm (blister T4E). Please let us know the variable portions in
the drawing.
In the drawing MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1136 there are 2 mismatchings of location

of the manhole (soffit access) between section and plan view.
1) Please clarify whether the manhole is on 1 or both sides of the span, and exact
14 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000014 Location of Manhole in Segment location of manhole. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1136, 0996
2) Please clarify whether the Contractor shall follow the detail below on drawing
MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0996, which is following same criteria as dual track.
1. Dual track span For the temporary bottom blister on dual track segments, the
position shown on drawing MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0821 rev30 is centered in most
of the segments, and the segments that have the manhole has the block
deviated. There is no dimension for the blister position on the segments with the
15 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000015 Location of Temporary Blister blister centered (no manhole). ADJV want to place the blister centered always in MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0821
the segment length for the segments without manhole. Please clarify whether
the Contractor can consider the blister centered always in the segment length
for the segements without manhole, and exact position of the blister for the
segements with the manhole.
The shear keys are defined with different spacing in drawings MCRP-DWG-VIA00-
ST-0802 rev30 and in drawing MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0804 rev30. Also the
bottome shearkey is drawn without demolding angle.
16 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000016 Shear Key Spacing and Demoulding Angle 1) Please let us know which of them the Contractor shall be followed. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0802, 0804
2) ADJV proposes to provide such angle or enlarge the shear key to avoid
breakages during demolding operations like Figure 3. Please let us know whether
this proposal is applicable.
The web thickness in T1 and T1M is different (350mm and 500mm), so a step on
the inner face of the segment will happen.
For the process of the matchcasting, the formwork needs to have some cm of
overlap with the already casted segment and this overlap needs to be in an area
long enough for the proper work of the mould (have
17 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000017 Transition between T1 and T1M Segments solid support) In order to make the inner formwork workable and the matchcast MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0062
process between T1 and T1M solid, the Contractor may need to make the
transition(500-350) towards the T1M by 80mm, allowing the inner
formwork to overlap and stand on a correct surface on the T1. Please refer to
the below sketches and attached drawing for the better understanding.
1. There are discrepancies between the Top of rail level of STA 60+857.5 shown
in DWG-BR105-ST-0011 and DWG-VIA02-ST-0108, which are 25.15m and
25.194mm respectively. It is kindly requested to clarify which one is correct
18 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000018 Top of Rail Level at Sta. 60+857.5 information. MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0108; MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0011
2. It is kindly requested to clarify which information has the priority, if there are
discrepancies between pier schedule and general arrangement drawings as
mentioned above.
16 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
1. It is kindly requested to clarify that the Contractor is able to choose the

plywood as the material for the outer form of the Form Traveller for Balanced
Cantilever and Extradosed Brdige with the confirmation that the concrete
surface must be compiled with the requirments under the contract.
19 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000019 FT Outer form Material 2. Please be noted that the self-weight of plywood outer form for form traveller No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
is lighter than the steel outer form, consequently it is surely have advantages in
using the lighter form traveller to assure the exact camber control, increased
stability and constructibility.
Further to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSF-RFI-ST-000026, the Contractor has a concern on

the reaction beam. According to ADTM D1143, the clear distance of at least five
times the maximum of the diameter of the test pile or anchor pile is required.
20 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000020 Request for a Reduction of Clear Distance However, Drilled Shafts, published by U.S Department of Transportation Federal No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Highway Administration, shows requirement of 5 times clear distance can be
In TYPICAL PLAN
impractical and Table
to achieve 2 : SEGMENT
for large diameter SCHEDULE
bore pile asoffollowing.
MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-
0821, SEGMENT TYPE OF SEGMENT NUMBER 3 AND 14 do not match to each
NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000020
other.
Figure Please clarify
1: Drilled which
Shafts segment type shall
(FHWA-NHI-18-024) beisapplied.
That becauseInthis
addition, webto
is related
thickness
fabricationofand
T1 type is 350mm and
transportation web thickness
of reaction beam. Ifofwe
permanent
apply to 5bottom
times blister
BB2 is 500mm.
diameters But,
of pile, thein length
Table 2of: SEGMENT SCHEDULE
beam will be around 20mof MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-
as below figure.
0821, there are some segment that SEGMENT TYPE is T1 and permanent bottom
Type of Segment and Permanent Blister for 10.3m blister is BB2. Therefore, ADJV want to clarify Blister Type for SEGMENT NUMBER
21 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000021 Wide Box 3, 5, 6, 11, 12 and 14. Lastly, for span lengths of 27500 and 25000, SEGMENT 5 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0821, 0951, 0952, 0991
and SEGMENT 12 as shown in TABLE 1 of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0821 are marked
as N/A. But in TABLE 2 in the same sheet, blister type on top layout 2, TB1 is
placed on the SEGMENT 5 and SEGMENT 12. Please clarify where do TB1 shall be
placed. NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000021.
In PLAN1.and
Figure SECTION
TYPICAL PLAN1 andof IFC Drawing
Table MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1081,
2: SEGMENT PB01 shape
SCHEDULE of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-
code LZ in PLAN does not match to SECTION 1 or Bar shape in SECTION 1 does
ST-0821.
22 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000022 Bar Shape Code of PB01 in Permanent Blister not match to shape code in MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1101. Please clarify which Bar MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1081, 1101
shape shall be applied for PB01. NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000022; Figure
1. PLAN and SECTION 1 in MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1081
1) In the attached drawing, if we follow minimum space of 400mm of starter bar

in the MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0601. The starter bar of Pier Column will be hanged
400mm Minimum Space Starter Bar of Pier Column and not meet the bottom bar of Pile cap. For this matter we have two option.
23 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000023 From Bottom Slab of Pile Cap Option 1, we can apply spacer block to avoid the starter bar for sliding. Option 2 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0601
is to let the starter bar to be meet the bottom bar of Pile cap but the minimum
400mm space will not met. May we request if we can apply that said option.
1) As per our drainage schedule in the drawing no. MCRP-DWG-SFD-DR-2004

and MCRP-DWG-SFD-DR-2004, our drainage channel with dimension W 500 x D
Bar Size and Spacing of Bar Mark 6 at Table 3 Type B 500 will fall on the table 3 drainage type B channel.As per attached drawing in MCRP-DWG-SFD-DR-2004, MCRP-DWG-SFD-DR-2004
24 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000024 Channel and MCRP-DWG-SFD-DR-2031
table 3 there is no available bar size and spacing of bar mark 6. in this matter
may we request details for the said bar mark.
According to Draft Design Criteria Report May 2019 in as shown in Table 7.13,
the Site Factor, Fpga at Zero-Period on Acceleration Spectrum for Level 1 Seismic
Peak Ground Acceleration and Response Spectral Event is 1.64. Upon checking DPWH Guide Specification LRFD BSDS as shown on No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
25 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000025 Acceleration Coefficients Table 3.5.3-1 and by using interpolation, Site Factor Fpga should be 1.56. Please
clarify the correct value.
In the drawings showing the construction sequences of the Balanced Cantilever

and Extradosed Bridge, the side span is constructed without the closure
segment. However, the Contractor would like to suggest to use closure segment
26 Structural Bridge 105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000026 Construction Methodology of BC and ED Bridge for the side span for Extradosed brdige and Balanced Cantilever Brdige as shown DWG-BR105-ST-0012, DWG-BC01-ST-2006, DWG-BC01-ST-4006
in following figure. It is surely confirmed that details for the closure segment,
such as the length and location and construction sequences will be provided with
geometry control data accordingly.
According to ASTM D1143/D1143M, Minimum clear distance should 5 times

NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSF-RFI-ST-000026 Minimum Clear Distance Between Test Pile and diameter of largest pile, but not less than 2.5m as below figure. However, Clause
27 Structural _LEGACY Reaction Piles 6.3.1 in ASTM D1143/D1143M mentions “The Engineer may increase or decrease No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
this minimum clear distance based on factors…... “.
1. It is written in AASHTO M251 8.5 that "one full size bearing per every ten per
28 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000027 Bearing Test lot, a minimum of two bearings." No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
17 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
The Contractor is now preparing for the camber calculation based on the
requirement written in the Specification and Drawings. Please be noted that it is
P458 TO P462 kindly requested to provide the design report or the modelling file of the MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0005 [Camber and Prestressing]
P467 TO P470 Assumption to Calculate the Camber for Balanced balanced cantilever and extradosed bridge, in order for us to minimise the MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2005 [General Notes for Construction Sequence]
29 Structural P431 TO P434 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSF-RFI-ST-000027 Cantilever and Extradosed Brdige clarification and review period. If the Engineer mind providing such information, MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4005 [General Notes for Construction Sequence]
P660 TO P663 it is kindly requested to provide further details as shown in followings, but not
In reference
limited to, to Technical Specifications Clause 207.2.3, Tie Wire shall be No. 16
gauged annealed wire. However it was realized that gauged 16 is quiet hard to
use, workers needs to exert further effort and gives discomfort and ultimately
less productivity. It was then we introduced the use of gauged 18 as trial.
Stability in the reinforcement had been analyzed and proven no difference. Work
productivity has improved. Consultant/Engineer of the project was satisfied and
30 Structural Tie Wires NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000028 Tie Wires Comparison and Usage got an approval for its usage. Therefore in MCP2 project, we intend the usage of No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
gauged 18 galvanized tie wire. As referred to ASSHTO M32/ASTM A-82 General
requirements Clause 3.1 Note 1 (These sizes represent the most commonly used
item in both welded wire fabric abnd wire usage. Othere sizes can be used.) In
any case,
In Pile CapWe the contractor
Reinforcement are willing
Drawings, to demonstrate
there to the Engineer
are some ambiguous lengthsthe
for
effectiveness
development of or this process.
lap as shown in the below figures. Please provide each length
Development Length or Lap Length in Pile Cap for the marked parts in the below figures. (Length of lap between B4-N40 and
31 Structural Pile Cap Reinforcement NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSF-RFI-ST-000028 Reinforcement MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0341, 0342, 0343, 0344, 0345
B1-N40, length of development for B4-N40 and B1-N40, length of lap or
development between side face bars)
1. P-595 This pier is used to connect 10.3 precast segment brdige and CIS50-9
and there should be four elastomeric bearings for CIS50-9 as shown in DWG-
CIS50-ST-0080. However P595 is shown to be type 1 shown in DWG-VIA00-ST-
32 Structural P595 & P597 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000029 Bearing Arrangements at P595 and P597 0423, which means one more bearing is required to be there. In addition to this, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0422, 0423,0447,0448
L10 dimension is shown to be in P595, but not shown in the bearing
arrangement.
Information on water flow like volume of water flow, water level and flow
2. P-597at
velocity This pier is used
waterways areto connect for
necessary twothe
6.3Contractor
precast segment spans
to select and and BR110
design
which
properisriver
steelcrossing
box with P598, consequently
methods like temporary6 bearings at increasing
bridge, temporary chainage
pipe culvert,side
P437 & P438 4 bearing
etc. Pleasetoletconnect
us know CIS50-3 between
information on P597
waterand
flowP596. Please
including theconfirm
maximumthatwater
it is
P468 &P469 correct
level, understanding
maximum volumethat the arragement
of water should beflow
flow and maximum reversed namely
velocity 6 bearing
for the below
33 Structural P583 & P584 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSF-RFI-ST-000029 Flow Information of Waterways waterways. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
P705 & P706 - Masaluso River (between Pier P-437 and P-438)
P765 & P766 - Pambaling River (between Pier P-468 and P-469)
- Sand Fernando River (between Pier P-583 and P-584)
As shown
- Creek on NSCR-GCR-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-CN-000014_N-02,
between Pier P-705 and P-706 Engineer’s response
on the OCS pole location,
- Sarion-Malpitic we realized
Creek (between Pier that
P-765there
and will be 3 segments of type T1M
P-766)
to have the provision of the OCS pole/backstay. This may result in the
preparation of a special provision of the mould for these 3 segments. In addition,
34 Structural P518, P591 & P597 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000030 Relocation of OCS Pole the presence of top blister on T1M segment may create a technical difficulty to NSCR-GCR-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-CN-000014_N-02
the formwork design and operation, especially for the inner formwork due to the
inclusion of the rib. To avoid these, we
proposed to shift the following OCS pole location to fall either on T1 or A1 type
segment.
1. The Contractor understands the Engineer’s intention to omit the cable troughs
on Viaduct. Please kindly carify that the cable troughs on the single track box
girder in front of San Fernando station, extradosed bridge, balanced cantilever MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1500; MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1501;
NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000030 bridge, cast in-situ box girders and steel box are also removed, namely there will MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1502; MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1521;
35 Structural Viaduct Segments _LEGACY Omission of Cable Troughs on Viaduct
not be cable troughs anymore in CP N-02. If not, please kindly provide the MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1551; MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1552
drawings showing the location of cable troughs on the plan view.
2. It is kindly requested to clarify that the deck widening shown in MCRP-DWG-
VIA00-ST-1500 is still valid, since there will be enough space for electronic point
machine, shunting signal and impedance
As shown on NSCR-GCR-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-CN-000013_N-02, there are some cases
where only one side of the segment is required for an OCS pole. This can be
found in 6.1m and 10.3m wide segments, as shown below.
Rib Location When OCS Backstay is Required on One NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000031, In such case, the contractor would like
36 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000031 Side of Segment Only No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
to ask for clarification if the rib is needed only on where the OCS pole is located
including the inner part of the segment or both sides including the inner part of
the segment.
1. Please provide the specification for the 38.5 THK. rubber strip
2. Please provide the specification for the glue to be used between the rubber
NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000031 trip and steel pin.
37 Structural Viaduct Segments _LEGACY Seismic Restrainer Installation 3. Please let the Contractor know that the hole located in the bottom slab for the MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1401
seismic restrainer can be made larger than D4 length, so that the void will be
grouted up after installation of seismic restrainer pin and rubber strip.
As shown in IFC drawings MCRP-DWG-VIA000-ST-0952 and 0971 rev30, the

38 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000032 Number of Ferrules to be Inserted per Segment specified number of ferrule inserts are not matching with the actual count MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0952 and 0971 rev30
showing on the section and plan view. Please see below for the summary.
18 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
With respect to termination depth of bores, In TS 204.2.7.3 Depth of Bores, it is
specified “the bores shall be taken below the proposed founding level to a depth
of at least 3 times the diameter of the pile. In case the soil at that level is found
to be unsuitable or of doubtful bearing capacity, the depth of investigation
NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000032 below the proposed founding level, shall be extended till firm and stable soil or
39 Structural Bored Pile _LEGACY Termination Depth of Bores rock is met with.” No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
However, termination depth of bore is not clear in case unsuitable soil at the
level is found. Thus, the Contractor would like to ask the Engineer to clarify
where the termination depth is. Please give the Contractor an instruction how
Design of Typical Type P-7 Pier Steel Inspection The
longContractor would
the bore shall like to askfrom
be extended the Engineer
(1) to (2).to provide Type P-7 Pier steel
40 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000033 Platform inspection platform calculations (including applied loads and design of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0502 to MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0506
anchoring). This is for the analysis of possible anchoring options.
NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000033 MCRP-VIA00-ST-0822~0826, which are referred to in Item 9 in NOTES of Drawing

41 Structural Viaduct Segments _LEGACY Request for Drawing VIA00-ST-0822-0826 VIA00-ST-0951 and 0952 are not found in IFC Drawings. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0822~0826
Please provide us with the Drawings MCRP-VIA00-ST-0822~0826.
The Contractor received the “Draft Design Criteria Report (May 2019)” last
January 2021 and the “Chapter 9 Hydrology and Hydraulics in Draft Final Report”
last March 2021.
42 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000034 Latest Design Criteria Upon comparing the two documents, the Contractor noticed inconsistencies. As No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
the Contractor is preparing and performing engineering works and designing
special equipment, the Contractor would like to ask, if any, a copy of the latest
design criteria report.
It is written in the specification sub clause 231.3.2 [Genera] that “Tensioning

operations shall be accomplished at a time, using multi-strand jacks during the
NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000034 phases of construction with full consideration for geometric control of stay
43 Structural Viaduct Segments _LEGACY Stressing Method No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
cables.”. It is kindly requested to clarify whether or not the Contractor is able to
use mono-strand jacks with ISO-tensioning method.
As shown in MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0105 and 0106 (see below table) Pier Nos. P-

570, P-571, P-572, P-573, P-596, P-597, P-598 and P-609 are having a Pier MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0646 to 0649, MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0105 to 0106
P570, P571, P572, P573, P596, Reinforcement Type of P5D. DWG No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0471
44 Structural P597, P598 & P609 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000035 Specific P5D Type of Pier Reinforcement However, in MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0646 to 0649 shows P5D with Type 1 to Type
5. As regards to this, the Contractor would like to ask for the specific P5D type of
pier reinforcement on the said pier locations.
1. It is written in the specification sub clause 216.2.5 [Testing] that Elastomeric
Bearings shall be subjected to the test described in AASHTO M251. Please clarify
that the Elastomeric Bearings do not follow the tests requirements shown in
NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000035 TS216.1.5.2 [Tests], since there are some discrepancies between them.
45 Structural Viaduct Segments _LEGACY Bearing Test No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
2. Based on AASHTO M251 8.2, the Lot size is 100 bearings, please confirm it.
3. Please let us know that it is correct understanding that Elastomeric Bearings
will be tested by AASHTO M251 and Pot and Disc Bearings will be tested by
TS216.3.4.
The Contractor has received the Engineer’s response regarding the details of
block outs or sleeves passing through the segment. However, the Contractor
More Specific Details of Block Outs or Sleeves Passing would like to ask for more specific details such as materials of ducts and exact
46 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000036 Through the Segment No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
locations/dimensions of every block outs in a segment and of which type of
segment.
NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000036 VIA00-ST-1251 referred to in SECTION 1 in MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1041, is not

47 Structural Viaduct Segments _LEGACY Request for Drawing VIA00-ST-1251 found in IFC Drawings. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1041
Please provide us with the Drawing VIA00-ST-1251
According to Technical Specification 204.3.8, the Access Tubes (Sonic Tubes) shall
be at least 38.1mm inside diameter. On the other hand, the Drawing No. MCRP-
DWG-VIA-ST-0320 mentions the Sonic Tubes shall be 50mm ID. In respect with
48 Structural Viaduct Bored Piles NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000037 Sonic Tube Inside Diameter Sonic Pipe internal diameter, ASTM D6760 specifies the tubes typically have an MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0320
internal diameter from 38 to 50mm. As for the Contractor’s and Subcontractors
experience, the 38.1mm is enough to perform Sonic Logging Crosshole Test
because the probes has 28mm diameter.
It is noticed that in the viaduct pier type P7 inspection steel platform, the
dia.20mm and 500mm deep adhesive anchors are proposed as fixing method.
NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000037 There are 8 main anchor plates EP1 per support and 10 number of dia.20mm
49 Structural Pier Head _LEGACY P7 Steel Platform Fixing Method MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0501 to MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0506
adhesive anchors in each end plate EP1 thus giving total 80pcs of drill anchors
per support.
19 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
As per MCRP-DWG-VIA02-DR-0059 to 0104, locations of Maintenance Access

Cover are not shown. Also, in MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0302, details of
Location of Maintenance Access Cover and Details of Maintenance Access opening are missing. For this matter, the Contractor would MCRP-DWG-VIA02-DR-0059 to 0104 and MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0302;
50 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000038 Opening for Maintenance Access Cover like to request for the location of these Maintenance Access Cover and detailed MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0301; MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0305
drawings for the opening.
It is noticed that in note 5 on the IFC drawing MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0402 it is

mentioned to apply anti-graffiti coating on all exposed surfaces.
NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000038 Dept. Responsible Sungho Chun NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000038. The
51 Structural All Piers _LEGACY Anti - Graffiti Quantity provisional sum PS-9 includes limitation of anti-graffiti application up to 3m MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0402
height above the ground level. Please clarify which requirement the Contractor
should follow.
In order to standarize and avoid modifications on the bulkhead, the Contractor

52 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000039 Type C Shear Key Positions would like to propose to maintain the position of the shearkey of segment 5.1m MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0802
for the 6.3m.
The pile caps, piers and pier heads concrete strength stated in MCRP-DWG-
VIA00-ST-0402 and TS200 Table 206.4-1 is 40MPa.
NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000039 On the MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4033 and 4022 drawings it is stated that 50MPa MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0402, MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4033,
53 Structural Bridge 104 _LEGACY Concrete Strength for BR104 Main Piers MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4022
concrete shall be used for BR104 main piers. Please clarify which concrete
requirement the Contractor should follow.
It is kindly requested to clarify followings regarding your response No.2

1. As you mentioned in your responses, the deveolpment length is 1,700mm.
The Contractor would like to understand the reason why the Engineer put the MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0321~0324, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1653,
54 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000040 Pile Rebar Details additional standard hook there, even the development length already assured. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0341, MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2012,
2. It is not understandable that AASHTO 5.11.2.1 is applicable to the MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4012, MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0033
reinforcement of minimium yield strength greater than 75ksi. Please let us know
the reason why AASHTO 5.11.2.1 can not be applied to pile rebar for the viaduct.
Contractor would like to ask for the details of opening of maintenance access
55 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000041 Maintenance Access Opening Reinforcement Details cover of Type A and Type B. MCRPDWG-VIA00-DR-0302
As shown in “Draft Design Criteria Report (May 2019)”, Chapter 5 is “Hydrology

and Drainage Design” and Chapter 9 is “Track Work”. But based on the
56 Structural All Underground Works NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000042 Complete Chapters of Design Criteria Report Engineer’s response (NSCR-GCR-N02-CSFSTN-000011), Chapter 9 is “Hydrology No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
and Hydraulics”. Also, the header shows “Draft Final Report”.
Contractor would like to request for these connection bolt details.

1. As shown in Plan of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-0502 (see below), SB2 channels are
57 Structural All Piers NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000043 Inspection Platform Details interconnected to each other. But there are no clear details showing this MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0501 to 0506
connection (if bolted or welded). Hence, the Contractor would like to as for more
details of this connection.
58 Structural All Emergency Staircase NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000044 Pier Location for Staircase request the exact coordinates of Pier in the staircase. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1651-1653
Difference is mainly the height we add and slope for unmoulding. The changes
59 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000045 Change in Top Blister Dimensions on the section of the blister will not structurally affecting the segment MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0991 and 0992 rev30.
performance.
As shown on section 2 of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1132, distance of T8 from the
Distance of T8 from the Centre on Box Girder Typical center is 790. But, upon checking of the Plan in AutoCAD file, it shows that the
60 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000046 Plan (10.3m wide) distance is 792. Regarding this discrepancy, the Contractor would like to clarify MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1132
for the correct dimension.
In accordance with Technical Specification 207.2.1, the Contractor shall comply

with ASTM A706M Deformed Carbon-Steel bars for rebar use. The contractor
An Inquiry on Welding of Stopper at Main Rebar for submitted the MAR shown in Figure 2 according to the PNS 49 and obtained
61 Structural Bored Pile NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000047 Safe Rebar Cage Lifting No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
approval from the Engineer. ASTM A706M is the same as PNS 49 as shown in
Figure 1.
Anti-Bursting Rebar Details for the Permanent Please kindly provide further details for anti-bursting rebars for the permanent
62 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000048 Concrete Blister blister. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1081
All Piers with seismic retrainer Please let us know which value is correct. It seems that the value shown in L1
63 Structural pin NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000049 Seismic Restrainer Length column is 300mm longer than the summed value MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1401
Based on the drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1901, still not clear in which MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1901 Rev.31; MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0400;
64 Structural All Piers NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000050 Lightning Arrester Detail pier lightning arrester is required to be installed. The contractor needs a list of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0401; MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001;
piers in order to coordinate with CP NS-01 E&M Contractor. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1021
20 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
65 Structural P660 to P663 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000051 Saddle System for Extradosed Bridge Saddle test and type MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1081
1) As per drawing below there is a gap between GL and Slab on grade, But the
Materials to be use between GL and Slab on grade for gap does not specify what material to be use. MCRP-DWG-BP2-4201, MCRP-DWG-SS14-ST-4201,
66 Structural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000052 SFD Station, SIGCOM, ELECTRIC HOUSE, Battery Post 2) For this matter may we request the details and materials to be used in the said MCRP-DWG-SS15-ST-4201, MCRP-DWG-SS16-ST-4201,
and Substation gap. MCRP-DWG-SS17-ST-4201 and MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4506
As per our previous response to RFI-ST-000030, the concrete cable troughs are
67 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000053 Omission of Cable Troughs on Viaduct removed in all sections, including the sections shown in DWG No. MCRP-DWG- DWG No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0065 [31]
VIA00-ST-0065 [31].
Change of Splice Method for Piles of Station and An Inquiry on Change of Splice Method for Piles of San-Fernando Station and MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4301, MCR-DWG-SS15-ST-4301, MCRP-DWG-ISER2-ST-4301,
68 Structural Ancillary Building Bored Pile NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000054 Buildings Buildings MCRP-DWGCP2-ST-4301
An Inquiry on Use of Concrete Spacer for Pile of Station and Buildings instead of MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4301, MCR-DWG-SS15-ST-4301,
69 Structural Station and Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000055 Use of Concrete Spacer for Pile of Station and Buildings the Flat Bar. MCRP-DWG-ISER2-ST-4301, MCRP-DWG-CP2-ST-4301
70 Structural Viaduct Pile caps NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000056 Modification of Rebar B7 in Pile Caps Modification of rebar B7 in pile caps MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0341 to MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0345
P458 TO P462
P467 TO P470 Response to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000018, MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-
71 Structural P431 TO P434 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000057 Bearing Heights of BC and ED Bearing Heights of BC and ED 0101,0102, 0107,0108 MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2001, 2021, 2031 MCRP-DWG-
P660 TO P663 BC03-ST-4001, 4021, 4033 MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0401, 0101, 0151
P458 TO P462
P467 TO P470 Design Criteria for Extradosed Bridge and Balanced
72 Structural P431 TO P434 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000058 Cantilever Bridge Design Criteria for Extradosed Bridge and Balanced Cantilever bridge MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0005
P660 TO P663
It is noticed that length 31744mm of the MT02 approach structure shown on the
73 Structural MT02 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000059 MT02 Approach Ramp Length Clarification MCRP-DWG-CIS70-ST-0004 vary to the length 46647mm shown on the MCRP- MCRP-DWG-CIS70-ST-0004, MCRP-DWG-CIS70-ST-0092
DWG-CIS70-ST-0092.
In TS200 chapter 207.2.3 it is stated that 1.6mm diameter (gauge 16) tie wire
should be used. The Contractor would like to ask if tie wire diameters 1.4mm
74 Structural All Structures NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000060 Tie Wire Diameter (gauge 17) and 1.2mm (gauge 18) could be used in substructure works (pile caps, No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
piers, pier heads, portal frame, staircases, MT02 abutment and MT02 approach
ramp).
P458 TO P462
P467 TO P470
75 Structural P431 TO P434 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000061 Conflict in Concrete Cover of Pile Cap (BC01) Conflict in Concrete Cover of Pile Cap (BC01) MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2012, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0341
P660 TO P663
Conflict in Concrete Cover of Pile Cap, Pier and Pier
76 Structural P467 to P469 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000062 Head (BC03, BR104) Concrete Cover of Pile Cap, Pier and Pier Head (BC03, BR104) MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4012, 4049, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0341
Concrete Cover of Pile Cap, Pier and Pier Head for

77 Structural P660 to P663 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000063 BR105 Concrete Cover of Pile Cap, Pier and Pier Head for BR105 MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0005, 0032, 0042
Concrete Cover in Abutment and Ramp Structure

78 Structural MT02-1 & ABUT NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000064 (CIS70) Concrete Cover on Pile Cap (Viaduct) MCRP-DWG-CIS70-0101, 0102, 0112, 0113
79 Structural All Viaduct Pile Caps NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000065 Conflict in Concrete Cover in Pile Cap (Viaduct) Conflict in Concrete Cover in Pile Cap (Viaduct) MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0321~0324, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0341
80 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000066 Segment Widening Clarification Segment Widening Clarification No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4101, MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4201, MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4301,
81 Structural Battery Post NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000067 Structural Drawing for Battery Post Type B For the Battery Post type B there is no details shown on the Structural drawing MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-43 and MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4311
Coordinates for the Substation, Signaling House and
82 Structural Ancillary Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000068 Battery Post Structures Coordinates for the Substation Structures MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0011 to MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0056
Detailed Hydraulic Analysis Information for Pambaling Detailed Hydraulic Analysis Information for Pambaling River and Melgido
83 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000069 River and Melgido (Masaluso) River (Masaluso) River MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0012 and 0016, MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-0014
Lap Length and Development Length of Pile Cap

84 Structural Viaduct Pile Caps NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000070 Reinforcement Lap Length and Development Length of Pile Cap Reinforcement MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0341 to 0345
85 Structural Viaduct Pile Caps NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000071 Side Bars of Pile Cap Contractor would like to propose to use an L-shape for the side bars Lap Length and Development Length of Pile Cap Reinforcement
In the IFC drawings there is a dimension of 15x15mm chamfer for the segments,
please refer to (a) Notes. The Contractor received recommendation from the
86 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000072 Chamfer Dimension for Precast Segmental mould supplier to use rubber chamfers, which we agreed as per our experience MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0901
also to avoid unnecessary leaks of concrete slurry which may happen in case of
usage of steel chamfers.
87 Structural CIS Bridge NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000073 Details Between CIS and Precast Segmental Details between CIS and Precast Segmental MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0151, MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0032
As per the Engineer’s instruction to Test Piles, two test piles (Test Pile No. 5 and
No. 7, hereinafter TP05 and TP07) are planned for Soil Class 4. The test results of
TP05, which is basically planned for Station, can be used to verify length of all MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0030, MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0031,
88 Structural Bored Piles NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000074 Exemption of TP07 Pile Testing
working piles within the San Fernando Station including piles for San Fernando MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0032, MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0106
Station, Genset and Station SIG/COM piles.
21 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
1) Provision of the widening dimension (width) for spans 594-595 and 611-612.
89 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000075 Widening Clarification 2) Confirmation that the OCS bottom rib under the flange is not affecting the MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0150-151
widening.
The Contractor would like to update the attached documents in RFI “NSCR-ADJV-
N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000076” since, there are typographical error in Y-
90 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000076 Tendon Profile Location / Precast Segmental Bridge coordinates of the T5 in segment 4-8 (refer to figure 1 and 2). Please see No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
attached sample drawing for more information about the tendon profile.
The Contractor would like to update the attached documents in RFI “NSCR-ADJV-
N02-
CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000076” since, there are typographical error in Y-coordinates of
91 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000076 Tendon Profile Location / Precast Segmental Bridge the T5 in No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
segment 4-8 (refer to figure 1 and 2). Please see attached sample drawing for
more information
about the tendon profile.
Confirmation on the possibility of rearrangement of the OCS Pole location in Pier

92 Structural P-597 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000077 OCS Pole Relocation in Pier P-597 P-597 No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
93 Structural P629 & P630 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000078 P629 and P630 Pile Caps Size Pile cap size MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0034
It is kindly requested to provide the required concrete strength to carryout
94 Structural Extradosed Bridge NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000079 Required Concrete Strength for Extradosed Bridge following activities like the tables shown in the drawings ref. MCRP-DWG-BC03- MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4060 and MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2061
ST-4060 and BC01-ST-2061.
P458 TO P462
P467 TO P470
95 Structural P431 TO P434 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000080 Transversal Movement of the Pot Bearings Please provide us the transversal translation values for these bearings MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0501,0502, BC01-ST-2050 and BC03-ST-4055
P660 TO P663
The Contractor would like to propose a light modification on the blister
96 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000081 Change in Bottom Blister Dimensions for T2 and T3 geometry to allow stripping by increasing the height in slope shape by 80mm MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0991 and 0992 rev30
(see Figure 2).
Proposal to use Steel Galvanized Recess for Seismic Possibility to use steel galvanized sleeve for the recess of the seismic restrainer
97 Structural Viaduct Pier Heads NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000082 Restrainer in Segment on the free end of the span MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1401 rev30.
MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002, 1021, 1022, 1041, 1051, 1061 MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-

Details for Track Slab Reinforcement and Shear 2081 MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4081 MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0451, 0452 MCRP-DWG-
98 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000083 Connector Details for Track Slab Reinforcement and Shear Connector BR110-ST-0083, 0084 MCRP-DWG-CIS40-ST-0032 MCRP-DWG-CIS50-ST-0032
MCRP-DWG-CIS70-ST-0031, 0032, 0033, 0113
The Contractor would like to ask the Engineer to verify if the movement of the
99 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000084 6.3m Wide Box Girder Tendon Layout tangency point will still be acceptable MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1137
The Contractor would like to propose some changes in the shape of the MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1041, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1051, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-
100 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000085 Modification of Rebar Shape in T1, T1M, T2 and T3 reinforcement in some positions. 1061 rev30.
Proposal to Change the Geometry of Bottom The Contractor would like to propose to adjust the geometry of Bottom
101 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000086 Permanent Blister for T2 & T3 Permanent Blister of segments T2 and T3 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0992
Stripping Slope of Recess to Bottom Tendons for A1, The Contractor would like to propose adding a slope on the concrete recess to MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0901, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0921, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-
102 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000087 A2 and A3 Segments bottom tendon 0941
103 Structural Viaduct Elastomeric Bearing NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000088 Elastomeric Bearing Translation Translation of the elastomeric bearings. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-781 & 782 Rev30 and 31
An Inquiry on Rebar Array & Alignment for 1500mm & 1200mm Dia. for Station
104 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000089 Station Pile Rebar Arrangement Bored Piles MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4301
Modification of the Geometry of Bottom Permanent The Contractor would like to modify the geometry of the bottom blister on
105 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000090 Blister for T1 segment T1 (Segment number 4 and 13) MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0991 rev 30
106 Structural P660 to P663 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000091 Prestressing Tendon for Extradosed Bridge (BR105) Change of prestressing tendon for BR105 MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0005
The Contactor’s understanding pile cap levels are determined on site and agreed MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0011~0020;
107 Structural Bridge BR116 (BC01) NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000092 Request for Design Report of Substructure of Bridges with the Engineer. In addition, estimated ground level is below top of pile cap at MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0089~0091;
some locations as shown in Figure 1. MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0101~0103;
In reference to The Engineer’s response to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-
Proposal for Inspection Platform to Consider Pre- 000037. The Contractor take note of The Engineer’s comments. So, The
108 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000093 Installed Anchor Bolt Contractor shall follow the original design without our modification as this is not No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
a Contractor design element of the works.
In the TS200 section 207.2.3 it is stated that finely annealed mild steel wire
should be used for tie wire. The Contractor would like to ask if galvanized iron
109 Structural All Structures NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000094 Tie Wire Type wire (GI wire) could be used as tie wire in substructure structural works (pile cap, No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
pier column and pier cap) and staircases works?
110 Structural Viaduct parapet Wall NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000095 Detailed Design of Parapet Wall Detailed Design of Parapet Wall MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1271
22 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
Re-arrangement of Track Slab Rebars for Type A1

111 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000096 Segment slightly re-arrange the rebar distance to avoid the interferences MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002
Coordinates of Substation (SS14) and Signaling House

112 Structural Ancillary Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000097 (ISER 2) Coordinates of Substation (SS14) and Signaling House (ISER 2) MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0103
Please let us know tests shown in TS231.4.3, namely [Fixing Capacity Test] and
113 Structural Extradosed Bridge NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000098 Fatigue Test Cost for Saddle [Fretting Fatigue Test] are included in Provisional Sum Item PS-5 [Fatigue Test for No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Stay Cable Saddle System for Extradosed Bridge] as described in following.
114 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000099 Request for Drawing Number VIA00-ST-1003 Request for missing drawing number VIA00-ST-1003. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Proposed Reinforcement Detail in Transition Between
115 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000100 T1 and T1M Segments Proposed Reinforcement Detail in Transition Between T1 and T1M segments MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1051 rev 30, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1041 rev 30
The Contractor notice that in joint T1 and T1M segment, Shear key on T1M is not
in contact with T1 segment because of the thickness differences. Please refer to
figure 1 and 2. In this case, T1M has a bigger shear key than T1 and this may
116 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000101 Proposed Shearkey Size in T1M Segment create loses of concrete though shearkey T1M while casting the T1. For this MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0802 rev 30
reason The Contractor would like to ask The Engineer if it is acceptable to
replace the T1M dimension(shear key) to T1 dimension (shear key).
117 Structural Viaduct Pier Column NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000102 Pier Column Reinforcement Pier Column Reinforcement NSCR-DWG-VIA00-ST-0603
Due to this The Contractor’s understanding is if the length should be 95 mm, the
type of Ferrule should be FE12095GH. Please clarify whether the Contractor’s
118 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000103 Request for Clarification in Type of Ferrule in Drainage understanding is correct. If not, please let us know the correct part number and MRCP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1351
dimension of the ferrule as per the Reid construction system product catalogue.
Emergency Staircase
119 Structural and Battery Post NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000104 Coordinates of Emergency Staircase and Battery Post Coordinates of Emergency Staircase and Battery Post MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1651
As per the drawing MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1500 rev 31, The Contractor notice

that the width of the segment plus the width of the widening do not match with
120 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000105 Clarification on the Width of the Widening Slab (T3) the total width of the segment (refer to figure 1). Table 1 is the Contractor’s MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1500 rev 31
understanding. The Contractor would like to ask the Engineer if our
understanding is correct. If not, please provide us revised detailed drawing.
As per the Engineer’s response on the RFI NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-

000050, the Contractor will incorporate the HDUPVC on the segmental, pier
Request for Exact Location and Details of Lightning head and pier column that is mentioned on the RFI response. However, the exact
121 Structural All Piers NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000106 Arrester location of the PVC is not indicated on the Engineer’s response (please refer to MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1901 (Rev 31)
figure 1,2,3,4 and 5). For example, how far is the location of the lightning
arrester from the top of pile cap (please refer to figure 4). The Contractor would
like to ask The Engineer to provide complete details for the exact location of this
Modification of Geometry in of A1, A2, and A3 The Contractor found an issue during the design of mould on the unmoulding
122 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000107 Segment operation of the manhole in diaphragm of the A2 and A3 segment. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0921, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0941
MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0601, 0621, 0625, 645, 0651, 0660, 661, 0671, 0680,

123 Structural Viaduct Pier Column NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000108 Location of Construction Joint in Pier Column Location of Construction Joint in Pier Column 0690, MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0153 MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2041, 2045 MCRP-DWG-
BC03-ST-4041, 4045, 4048, 4050
124 Structural Viaduct Pile Caps NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000109 Clarifications about Chamfers on Pile Clarifications about Chamfers on Pile MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0402
Confirmation on the possibility of rearrangement of the OCS Pole location in Pier
125 Structural P-823 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000110 OCS Pole Relocation in Pier P-823 P-823. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Please be noted that the Contractor already finalized the procurement process
of the seismic restrainer based on the Engineer’s drawing. The early responses
126 Structural BR104 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000111 Permanent Structure Check (BR104) will be much helpful for the Contractor to finalize the seismic restrainer MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4043 (Rev30)
procurement process.
The contractor would like to use the same mould of bulkhead for T1, T1M and
A1. However, T1 (refer to figure 1) and T1M/A1(refer to figure 2) has a difference
Proposed Top and Bottom Web Shear Key Geometry of 150mm web thickness. Hence, the Contractor will provide supplement mould
127 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000112 at Joint T1M/A1 and T1M/T1M MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0802 rev30
with thickness of 150mm together with T1(350mm) bulkhead mould to meet the
web thickness of T1M/A1.
Clarifications about Engineer’s Response (#2) for RFI Clarifications about Engineer’s Response (#2) for RFI Re: Pier Column MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0601, 0621, 0625, 645, 0651, 0660, 661, 0671, 0680, 0690
128 Structural Viaduct Pier Column NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000113 Re: Pier Column Reinforcement Reinforcement MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0153 MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2041, 2045 MCRP-DWG-BC03-
ST-4041, 4045, 4048, 4050
Proposal to move Segment Widening in Pier no. P592- The Contractor would like to porpose to move the small portion of widening that
129 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000114 P593 covers the segment 4,so the widening will start on sgement 5 MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0150 TO 151
23 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
Due to possible difficulty in installation and fixing of tie reinforcement bar with
shape code IZ and HH as shown in Figure 1, the Contractor would like to propose
modification of these shape codes to make an angle of 90 degree hook at one
130 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000115 Modification of Shape Code IZ and HH end instead of 135 degree and 180 degree hook, respectively. See Figure 2. The MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1101
rebar arrangement will be alternately installed. May we ask from your good
office your approval for this modification.
The Contractor would like to clarify the dimension of the temporary hole on top
of the segment. In Drawings MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0902, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-
Clarification of Temporary Hole Diameter on top of 922, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-942 are reflected that the hole should be 380 mm MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0902, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-922,
131 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000116 Segment A1, A2 and A3 diameter (refer to figure 1) whereas in Drawing MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1401 is MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-942, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1401
reflected that the hole diameter (top and bottom) depends on the seismic
restrainer type “D4” (refer to figure2).
Please clarify which one the Contractor shall follow of technical specification or
A Discrepancy of Quantity of High Strain Integrity Test bill of quantity. Further to an above query, the Contractor cannot find any pile
132 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000117 for San-Fernando Station tests for SIG/COM and Genset Buildings in the Bill of Quantity. Please clarify it No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
together.
The Contractor notice some discrepancy regarding the total height of the flap
133 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000118 Clarification for Total Height of Flap Gate 1 and 2 gate 1 and 2. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0451, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0452
Geotextile Fabric Clarification in Drainage Detail for

134 Structural Viaduct Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000119 Type 5 The Contractor would like to ask the Engineer to provide revised drawings. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0406
Request for Revised Detailed Drawing of Open

135 Structural Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000120 Channel Drainage Request for Revised Detailed Drawing of Open Channel Drainage MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0502
Request for Revised Detailed Drawing of Outfall (Single

136 Structural Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000121 Barrel) Request for Revised Detailed Drawing of Outfall (Single Barrel) MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0407, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0421
Request for Revised Detailed Drawing of Outfall The Contractor notice some discrepancy regarding the height of the headwall in
137 Structural Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000122 (Double Barrel) RCBC outfall MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0408, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0421
Request for Revised Detailed Drawing of Outfall (Triple The Contractor notice some discrepancy regarding the height of the headwall in
138 Structural Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000123 Barrel) RCBC outfall MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0409, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0421
1) As per the IFC DRAWING “MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0404”. In the outfall detail

for Type 3B the Contractor noticed that non-shrink cement grout is applied,
Verification of the Cement Grout and Grouted Boulder however dimensions for the area where the Engineer applied the non-shrink
139 Structural Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000124 in Drainage for Type 3B MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0404
grout is not specified. The Contractor would like to ask the Engineer for
dimensions where non-shrink cement grout will apply.
As per the IFC DRAWING “MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0401 to 0403”. In the outfall

Verification of the Non-Shrink Cement Grout in detail for Type 1, 2, and 3A the Contractor noticed that non-shrink cement grout MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0401, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0402,
140 Structural Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000125 Drainage for Type 1,2, and 3A is applied, however dimensions for the area where the Engineer applied the non- MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0403,
shrink grout is not specified.
In order to improve the assembly of reinforcing bars in pile cap, the Contractor
would like to include additional 28mm.Ø rebar chair support device spaced at
every 1.5 meter in both directions. These supporting devices will secure the top MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0341 to 0345
141 Structural Pile Cap NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000126 Rebar Chair Support for Top Bars in Pile Cap rebars’ position as to maintain the necessary concrete covering. Also, these are MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0032, -0042
meant to be a part of the permanent structure and got embedded in the MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4013
concrete. See Figure 1. May we ask from your good office your approval for this
additional support.
142 Structural Ancillary Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000127 Coordinates of Emergency Staircase and Battery Post Coordinates of Emergency Staircase and Battery Post MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1651
Clarification on Clashes Between Rebars and Tendon Contractor noticed that Top slab reinforcement bar detail of the segment is
143 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000128 at BR105 missing where the Contractor cannot confirm the clashes between bars and MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0451 to 0452
tendons
Clarification in Rebar Diameter to be Inserted on The Contractor’s understanding is that the diameter of rebar suitable to cross
144 Structural Viaduct Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000129 Drainage should be 10 mm or less. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1351
MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0321, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0322, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-

Contractor would like to ask the Engineer if the spiral can be extended from top 0323, MCRP-DWGVIA00-ST-0324, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0341, MCRP-DWG-
145 Structural Viaduct Bored Piles NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000130 A Constraint on Splices of Spiral Rebar in Pile Cap of B2-40 of pile VIA00-ST-0342, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST0343, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0344, MCRP-
DWG-VIA00-ST-0345
146 Structural Genset Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000131 GenSet Building’s Bored Pile Cut-off Level GenSet Building’s Bored Pile Cut-off Level MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4631
24 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
As per IFC drawing “MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0902,0922,0942 rev 30”, on segment

A1, A2, A3 the position of the hole for temporary prestress bar anchors are
located on the slope with 178Hx875W chamfer which caused difficulties in the
Modification of Recess for Temporary Prestress Bar formworks on this area, please refer to figure 1. The Contractor would like to MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0902, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0922,
147 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000132 Anchor Duct in A1, A2, and A3 Segment MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0942 rev 30
propose to place mortise/recess in the following geometry (A1, A2, A3) to
facilitate this panel configuration, please refer to figure 2. The Contractor would
like to ask the Engineer if the changes is acceptable.
Contractor would like to ask the Engineer if the spiral bar can be change into
hoop ring and be assembled from the top of the bottom bar up to the height of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0321, 0322, 0323, 0324;
Proposal for Changing Bored Pile’s Spiral Bar into Hoop 750 mm. The 20mmØ hoop ring will be installed staggered and spaced at 75mm MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0341, 0342, 0343, 0344, 0345;
148 Structural Viaduct Bored Piles NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000133 Ring in Pile Cap and shall be spliced by laps. The minimum length of lap splice shall be 40- bar MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2012 MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4012, 401
diameter
However, upon checking the IFC Drawings for bored pile reinforcement details,
pile detail for Pier Type P6 is missing. In this regard, the Contractor would like to
149 Structural Bored Pile NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000134 Request for Bored Pile Reinforcement Details request to the Engineer the bored pile reinforcement detail drawing for Pier MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0106, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0321
Type P6 and kindly clarify the pier reinforcement type of each pier mentioned
above.
With regards to the Engineer’s responses to the Contractor’s RFI of the

permanent verification result of BR104, please be noted followings. The
150 Structural BR104 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000135 Permanent Structure Check (BR104) Contractor hereby attached the modelling file and full report in order for both No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
parties to see the same pages regarding this issue.
Clarification on the Different Holes in the PrecastAs per IFC drawings in segmental, there are several holes with different purpose
151 Structural Viaduct Segment NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000136 Segmental like drainage, lifting holes, and temporary bottom blister in segmental. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0996,0971,0961,0952,0942,0922,0902 rev 30
As per the Engineer’s response to the RFI “NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-
000106”, the Contractor understand that the pipe inserted on the segment is HD
uPVC 63/53 (outside/inside diameter). However, the Contractor could not find a
Modification of HD uPVC Pipe used in Lightning supplier that has the 63/53 pipe here in the Philippines. So, the Contractor
152 Structural Lightning Arrester NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000137 Arrester would like to propose to use the equivalent pipe in external diameter but with No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
smaller wall thickness (the biggest available in market). The proposed pipe is
63/56 mm (outside/inside diameter), refer to figure 1. The Contractor would like
to ask the Engineer if the size of the HD uPVC pipe is acceptable and proceed
153 Structural P457 to P460 and P631 to P634 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000138 BR111 and BR116 Transition Pier Concrete Upstand BR111
with theand BR116 Transition Pier Concrete Upstand
procurement. MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2021
Confirmation of Wall Footing Tag at SIG COM ELECTRIC 1. Please confirm F1A2 or F1A Wall Footing Tag to be use as per MCRP-DWG-
154 Structural SIGCOM NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000139 HSE SFD-ST-4501. MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4501, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4541
Genset Building Confirmation of NO Parapet Wall on Roof Level at Confirmation of NO Parapet Wall on Roof Level at GENSET BUILDING and ISER
155 Structural and ISER Nos. 2 and 3 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000140 GENSET BUILDING and ISER Nos. 2 and 3 Nos. 2 and 3 MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4611, MCRP-DWG-SIG-3501
As per the IFC drawing “MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0801 rev 30”, the initial segment
in a span to be casted is the second. The Contractor would like to propose two
156 Structural Viaduct Segment NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000141 Initial Segment (First Casting Segment) options of span configuration on starting segment (please see figure 1 and 2) MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0801 Rev 30
using short line method.
Details of Cantilever Slab on Roof Level at BATTERY Please provide Details of Cantilever Slab on Roof Level at BATTERY POST No. 2
157 Structural Battery Post NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000142 POST No. 2 (BP2-1 to BP2-4) (BP2-1 to BP2-4). MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4101, MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4201
Details of Cantilever Slab on Roof Level at GARBAGE

158 Structural Garbage Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000143 BUILDING Please provide Details of Cantilever Slab on Roof Level at GARBAGE BUILDING. MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4661
As commented on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000144 Rev.C, Item No. 4,

regarding the actual installation of 5 Nos. Columns on Substation SS14. Proposed
arrangement is acceptable, nevertheless, the Engineer required to meet the
Detail of Pile Cap Footing – F1 at SUBSTATION Nos. 14- following criteria – “maximum angle of the rebar should be 9.4 degrees (or slope MCRP-DWG-SS14-ST-4306, MCRP-DWG-SS15-ST-4306,
159 Structural SS14 & SS17 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000144 17 MCRP-DWG-SS16-ST-4306, MCRP-DWG-SS17-ST-4306
of 1/6)” (See Figure 1). With this consideration, please see Figures 2 to 4,
illustrating the main steel column and column ties modification along pile cap
level (delivered rebar to be re-used) and key plan showing the affected columns.
Confirmation of Girder and Beam Dimensions at San

160 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000145 Fernando Station Confirmation of Girder and Beam Dimensions at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4111, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4312, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4321
Please provide detailed locations of Preformed Compressible Material. As per

Detailed Locations of Preformed Compressible our interpretation, this material will be used only below Station Plaza’s concrete
161 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000146 Material at San Fernando Station slab, around the concrete encased columns base. This will serve as a barrier MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4201 to 4202, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4211 to 4215
between the concrete encased columns base and backfilled materials.
162 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000147 Details of Construction, SAWN and Expansion Joints Details of Construction, SAWN and Expansion Joints MCRP-DWG-STA-ST-4002, MCRP-DWG-STA-ST-4026
25 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
Details of Treatment for Steel Columns at San

163 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000148 Fernando Station Details of Treatment for Steel Columns at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4121, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4401
Contractor propose to provide 250mm diameter of PVC pipe for the 3 cases
Geometry of the Recess for the Seismic Restrainer mentioned. This is the same case as the approved RFI “NSCRADJV-N02-CSFSTN-
164 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000149 Installation (Top Slab of Segment) RFI-ST-000031” for the bottom recess, the opening could be bigger and grouted MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1401 rev 30,
later. The Contractor would like to ask the Engineer if the proposal is acceptable
165 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000150 Confirmation of FGL and FFL at Garbage Building Confirmation of FGL and FFL at Garbage Building MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4661, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4201
The Contractor would like to clarify the position of the lightning arrester inside
Request for Clarification of Lightning Arrester Position the segment. There is a mismatching between the Drawing MCRP-DWG-VIA00-
166 Structural Viaduct Segment NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000151 in Segment ST-1901 and RFI response “NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000106”. In said RFI, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1901 Rev.32
it is mentioned that position of the lightning arrester is placed in EAST SIDE.
Gap between the Deck and Pier Head and Seismic

167 Structural Viaduct Pier Heads NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000152 Restrainer Length Gap between the deck and pier head, Seismic restrainer length MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0801, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1401
Followings are our understanding for the construction tolerance for the Precast
segmental bridges, Balanced Cantilever Bridge and Extradosed bridge based on
168 Structural All Bridges NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000153 Construction Tolerance for the Superstructure Works TS 206.18.1. Please advise us whether or not it is correct and clear No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
understanding.
The Contractor would like to ask the Engineer if tie rods embedded in the
169 Structural Formworks NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000154 Use of Tie Rod for Formworks System concrete is acceptable. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Anchor Bolt Details for Ladder Connection (Inspection

170 Structural Inspection Platform NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000155 Platform) Anchor Bolt Details for Ladder Connection (Inspection Platform) MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0506
171 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000156 Cable System Test ECF Strand Fatigue Test No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Contractor would like to ask clarification to the Engineer the details for column MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0421, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0627,
172 Structural P595 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000157 P-595 Column Dimension and Reinforcement Details dimension and reinforcement for pier P-595 MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0105
Concrete Pouring Sequence of Pile Cap Footings and As per MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4306 - Construction Joint is indicated and noting a
173 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000158 Girders at San Fernando Station concrete pouring at 2-stages. Can we have a monolithic concrete pouring MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4306
instead? This will eliminate lateral construction joints.
As shown on Section 1 of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0342 Rev. 31 (refer below

figure), B1 and B3 are both longitudinal bars while B2 and B4 are both transverse
174 Structural Viaduct Pile Caps NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000159 Pile Cap Reinforcement Discrepancy bars. But based on Table 2 (refer below table) on the same drawing sheet, B1 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0342 Rev.31
and B3 are transverse bars while B2 and B4 are longitudinal bars. The contractor
would like to request for clarification in this matter and/or revised drawing.
As per the RFI response “NSCR-GCR-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000003_N-02;

Engineer’s Response to RFI-000030” cable troughs have been removed.
However, on the parapet wall (refer to figure 1) the seat for the cable trough
Clarification on Cable Trough Cover Seat in Parapet covers still reflected. The Contractor would like to confirm to the Engineer
175 Structural Viaduct Segment NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000160 Wall MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002
whether this seat for the cable trough cover in parapet wall geometry is change
or not. And if so, there will be 2 options for the new geometry of the parapet
wall (refer to figure 2).
Contractor would like to modify the rebar shape in the Shear Connector, please
refer to figure 2. Only the shape of the rebar will change the diameter will still be
176 Structural Viaduct Pile Caps NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000161 Modification of Rebar Shape in Shear Connector N16. The Contractor would like to ask the Engineer if the modification of rebar is MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002, 1021, 1022, 1041, 1051, 1061
acceptable
As shown on Section B of MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0101 Rev. 31 (Figure 1) and Plan

A -Seismic Restrainer of MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0102 Rev. 31 (Figure 2) distance
from centerline of pier head to centerline of bearing is 1050mm. But upon
177 Structural P660 to P663 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000162 BR105 Transition Pier Head checking Section D of MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0102 Rev. 31 (Figure 3), the above MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0101 Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0102 Rev.31,
distance is 750mm only. The Contractor would like to ask for clarification for
these two different values.
As per drawing reference no. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1271 and NSCR-GCR-N02-

CSFSTN-LTR-Z000017 for the Noise barrier details we notice that there are no
178 Structural Viaduct Barriers NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000163 Noise Barrier (Parapet Wall) Reinforcement Details reinforcement details, for this matter may we request your good office for the MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1271
reinforcement details of Noise Barrier.
Contractor would like to propose to modify the shape of the stirrup T23-HT
Request for Change Shape of Stirrup T23-HT in OCS intended for the OCS pole as shown in figure 1. Only the shape of the rebar will
179 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000164 Pole change the diameter will still be N16 (refer to figure 2). The Contractor would MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1302
like to ask the Engineer if the modification of rebar is acceptable.
26 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
Relocation of Steel Columns on top of Foundation Relocation of Steel Columns on top of Foundation Girders at San Fernando
180 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000165 Girders at San Fernando Station Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4306, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4401
181 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000166 Battery Post Type of Battery Post, Structural Drawing Details and Correct Coordinates. MCRP-DWG-SA-AR-3051
Details of SB30M and SB50 Structural Steel Members Details of SB30M and SB50 Structural Steel Members at Roof Level San Fernando
182 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000167 at Roof Level San Fernando Station Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4151
183 Structural P457 to P460 and P631 to P634 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000168 Location of Inspection Platform in BC03 and BC01 Location of Inspection platform in BC03 and BC01 MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2105
As per RFI response “NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000106” the Contractor

adopt the location of the HDuPVC pipe for lightning arrester in precast
Request for Change Location of Lightning Arrester in segmental type A1, A2 and A3 (see figure 1). However, the Contractor notice that
184 Structural Viaduct Segment NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000169 Precast Segmental the location of the pipe will clash on the location of the OCS pole beam as shown No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
in figure 2 and 3. Hence, the Contractor would like to propose the following
change in location for the HDuPVC pipe for lightning arrester (refer to figure 4).
185 Structural Viaduct Pier Column NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000170 Seismic Restrainer Length Embedded Length into the Deck of the Seismic Restrainer. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1401
As per RFI response “NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000118” the height of flap

gate 2 will be 2300mm. However, the wedge stud anchor spacing is not provided
Clarification of the Wedge Stud Anchor Spacing in Flap (refer to figure 1). The spacing of the stud anchor in the “MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-
186 Structural Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000171 Gate 2 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0452
0452” do not match with revised height of the gate which is 2300mm. The
Contractor would like to ask the Engineer to provide revised IFC drawing
Based on the approved Design of Pot Bearing by Vinh Hung Trading Consulting
and Construction JSC with reference number NSCR-GCR-N02-CSFSTN-DRC-CN-
000060, pot bearing heights are different from each other depending on its type
(fix, free, guided), location (transition pier, main pier), place (inner, outer) and
187 Structural Bearing Plinth NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000172 Different Heights of Pot Bearings on the same Pier loads it carried as shown below. In this matter, the Contractor would like to ask if No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
where the adjustment will be made, on the grout pad above or the bearing
plinth considering the criteria given on the RFI response on NSCR-ADJV-N02-
CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000008 Bearing Details.
Request for Revised Detailed Drawing for Lintel Beam The Contractor would like to ask the Engineer to provide revised IFC Drawing.
188 Structural Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000173 Connection to Open Channel Drainage Wall Figure 1: MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0502. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0502
Segmental Reinforcement Modification and Request for Change of Shape Code VV. Clarification of T03 Position. Clashing of
189 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000174 Clarification Clashing of Rebar and Tendons T03 with Tendon Location. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002, 1022, 1041, 1051, 1061
This is in reference with the recess (Holes) for Seismic Restrainer in the Pier Head
Proposal to use PVC Pipe or Equivalent for the RECESS as shown on the IFC drawing (MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1401. And based on the
190 Structural Pier Column NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000175 (Hole) for Seismic Restrainer (Pier Column) TS216.10.4 (Boring Seismic Restrainer Holes and Installation) indicates the recess MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1401, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0672
(Holes) for Seismic Restrainer shall be “bored” true to the specified diameter.
Clarification for Splices between Spiral Bars in Pier Contractor would like to ask clarification from your good office about the
191 Structural P631 to P634 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000176 Column allowed lap splicing method that shall be adapted during construction – whether MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0690 MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4048
tied by tie wire or can be welded.
Request for Information in Bar Mark T24 OCS Pole Slab The Contractor would like to clarify the Engineer the location of the Bar Mark
192 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000177 Reinforcement Detail T24. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1302
193 Structural Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000178 Request for Missing Drawing in Drainage The Contractor would like to ask for the missing drawing of this realigned canal. MCRP-DWG-VIA02-DR-0072
The Contractor would like to change the following dowels, the reason for this
194 Structural Viaduct parapet Wall NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000179 Request for Change Shape in Dowels for Parapet Wall changes is later on we need to meet the proper elevation for the parapet wall as MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002, 1022, 1041, 1051, 1061
per actual situation
The Contractor would like to clarify two things regarding seismic restrainer holes.
1. The seismic restrainer holes detail (cloud in red) shown on Plan-P1 Pier of
195 Structural Viaduct Pier Column NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000180 Seismic Restrainer Holes MCRP-DWG-VIA00- 0401 Rev. 31 (Pier head concrete details) is different from MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0401 rev.31, MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-1401
the Section 2 shown on MCRP-DWGVIA00-1401. In this matter, the Contractor
would like to ask for clarification.
Information about Seismic Restrainer Upstand on Contractor would like to ask clarification to the Engineer about the dimension MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0400, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0471 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-
196 Structural CIS Bridge NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000181 CIS50 Bridge Pier Type P5D details of the seismic restrainer upstand for pier type P5D and its quantity as we 0645, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0801, MCRP-DWG-CIS50-ST-0012
need to install several seismic restrainers for this CIS50 bridge pier type
Information about Seismic Restrainer Upstand on Pier Contractor would like to ask clarification to the Engineer about the dimension MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0400, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0421 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-
197 Structural Viaduct Pier Column NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000182 Type P3 details of the seismic restrainer upstand for pier type P3 0801, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0621
Note 2 on the drawing MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0402 states that the minimum
198 Structural Formworks NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000183 Substructure Formwork Removal Requirement required concrete compressive strength for inclined surfaces of the pier shall be MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0402
15MPa at the time of stripping.
27 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
It is written in the specification that “Bridge Monitoring and Geometric Control

Procedures and Requirements as noted under Specifications Sections 2203 and
199 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000184 Field Monitoring System 2207 should be reviewed in conjunction with the provisions of this Specifications No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
section.
Reinforcement detail for Blockout (600Ømm Soffit The Contrcator would like to ask the Engineer to please provide revised IFC Reference Documents MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1051 and 1061, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-
200 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000185 Access Opening) in Segmental drawing for the blockouts of 600Ømm soffit access opening in T1M,T2 and T3 ST-0952,0961,0971
Reinforcement Detail of Rib when OCS Backstay is The Contractor would like to ask the Engineer to provide connection detail of the
201 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000186 required on one side of Segment reinforcement of the rib to the web in segment. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1302
The Contractor’s understanding the Ø50 mm drainage hole are located only in
Request for Clarification in Drainage Hole Ø50 mm in A1,A2,A3,T2, and T3 as per IFC drawing. However, drawing number “MCRP-
202 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000187 Segments DWG-VIA00-ST-0996” in figure 2 the Ø50 mm drainage hole is reflected in T1M MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-099
segment.
203 Structural Viaduct Pier Column NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000188 Seismic Restrainer Seismic Restrainer MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0014, 0011, 0012, , MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0061
Clarification on Track Slab Width and Location of the
204 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000189 Shear Connector Clarification on Track Slab Width and Location of the Shear Connector MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0061
In reference to the IFC drawing “MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2302 and MCRP-DWG-
BC01-ST2302“the bolt has an angle direction for BC01 and BC03 inspection
platform (refer to figure 1). The Contractor would like to propose to install the
205 Structural P457 to P460 and P631 to P634 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000190 Proposed Position of Anchor Bolt in BC01 and BC03 bolt in horizontal direction with additional plate please refer to figure 2. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0061 to 0062,
Dimensions of the plate will be specified on the shop drawing when Engineer
approved the proposal. The Contractor would like to ask the Engineer if the
proposed direction is acceptable. 2. The Contractor would like to ask the
Confirmation of FG11 Dimension on Support at San As per MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4111 and 4312, Foundation Girder Schedule, FG11 is
206 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000191 Fernando Station 2600 on Left and Right Support (see Figure-1) but upon measuring on CAD file, it MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4111, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4312
shows 2200 (see Figure-2).
The Contractor would like ask confirmation and approval to waive the testing
207 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000192 Post Tensioning System Testing Requirements from Engineer based on the above detailed explanation. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Request for Confirmation Anti Bursting Reinforcement Request for Confirmation Anti Bursting Reinforcement in Permanent Blister and
208 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000193 in Permanent Blister Segment Type A. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
The Contractor would like to propose the following location of drainage down
pipe in different span length for precast segment. Please refer to figure 1,2,3,4,
Proposed Drainage Location of Precast Segments in and 5. For negative longitudinal grade, the arrangement is mirrored as per IFC
209 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000194 Different Span Length MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1351
drawing. The Contractor would like to ask the Engineer if the proposal is
acceptable
The Contractor would like to use double stacking method for storage purpose in
pre casting yard. Please refer to the attached calculation for the checking of the
210 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000195 Double Stacking Method for Storage Purposes support on top and bottom of the precast segment to avoid cracking and No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
bending of the top slab in layer 1. The Contractor would like to ask the Engineer
if this storage with stacking method is acceptable.
MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0602, 0652, 0662, 0672, 0691 MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2042,

211 Structural Viaduct Pier Heads NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000196 Seismic Restrainer Concrete Upstand Seismic Restrainer Concrete Upstand 2046 MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4042, 4046 MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0102, 0152
Clarification for Pier Type P1 Pile Reinforcement Type

212 Structural Viaduct Bored Piles NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000197 P29 Clarification for Pier Type P1 Pile Reinforcement Type P29 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0322_Rev.31
The Contractor would like to clarify the orientation of N10 bar going thru the
213 Structural Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000198 Change of Orientation of N10 Bar in Drainage Ferrule drainage ferrules. As per IFC Drawings, the bar should go thru the 200 PVC pipe MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1351
as shown in Figure 1 below.
214 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000199 Clarification of Quantity for T01 and T02 Rebars Clarification of quantity for T01 and T02 rebars MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1041, 1051
As per response in NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000014, the access manhole
is located only on one side of the span, where there are no obstacles on the
215 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000200 Location of Accelerator ground that interfere with the accelerator. The Contractor would like to ask for No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
the specific locations of the accelerator in order to know in which segment the
access manhole should be place.
Contractor would like to clarify in which specific segments (chainage to chainage)
216 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000201 Location of Soffit Ferrules within the Station it is needed to install. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0951, 0952, 0971
Proposal to change Bar Shape TB01, TB02 and TB03 in Proposal to change Bar Shape TB01, TB02 and TB03 in Temporary Blister
217 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000202 Temporary Blister Reinforcement Detail Reinforcement Detail MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1091, 1101
As per IFC drawing “MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1081” the position for PB04 and PB05
Request for change Location of Rebar PB04 & PB05 is shown in figure 1. The Contractor would like to change the location of the legs
218 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000203 (Permanent Blister) in bar Marks PB04 and PB05, as shown in figure 2. The Contractor would like to MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1081
ask the Engineer if the proposal is acceptable.
28 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
As per drawing reference no. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1656 and MCRP-DWG-

219 Structural Emergency Staircase-3 & 4 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000204 Coordinates of Emergency Staircase VIA00-ST-1657 if we follow the given coordinates and the given dimension of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1656, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1657
Emergency Staircase in Plan view the two the data will not be match.
the Contractor want to propose a fixed values depending
on the slope. Consequently, based on these fixed values of “D” the pier height
220 Structural Viaduct Pier Heads NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000205 Pier Heights will be lowered up to 20mm. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0801
Querries on Shear Connector Arrangement for Tangent Track and Curved Track
221 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000206 Shear Connector Arrangement Drawing No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Finish Ground Elevation and Invert Elevation of

222 Structural Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000207 Drainage Channel Querries on Finish Ground Elevation and Invert Elevation of Drainage Channel MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0302 and MCRP-DWG-VIA02-DR-0059 to 0104
As per NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000203 the Contractor proposed to

Request for Change Location of Rebar PB08 & PB10 change the location of rebars PB04 and PB05 from bottom permanent blister. As
223 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000208 (Top Permanent Blister) per Contractor understanding, this change can be also applicable to Bar Marks MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1082
PB08 and PB10 in top permanent blister. Please, confirm.
Discrepancy in Size of Spiral Rebar Between RFI and The Contractor would like to insist that using 16mm spiral rebar diameter with
224 Structural Portal Pier NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000209 IFC Drawing 75mm pitch is more reasonable than using 20mm spiral rebar MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0324
Propose Bar Mark Shape of T02 in Top and Bottom Contractor would like to propose the following arrangement of the T02 rebar
225 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000210 Permanent Blister for T1,T1M,T2,T3 Segments that will only clash on the PT duct MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1081,1082,1041,1051,1061
Pier Head and Pier Column The Contractor would like to clarify if these general notes also apply to the Pier MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0032, MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0042,MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-
226 Structural (BR105) NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000211 Clarification on Steel Grade to be used in Pier Head Column and Pier Head of BR105 (Extradosed Bridge). 0103, MCRP DWG-BR105-ST-0153
and Pier Column (BR105)
227 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000212 Clarification of A31 Bar Diameter in A1 Segment The Contractor would like to ask the Engineer what bar diameter governs. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-1001,1002
Proposed to move Ferrules Location in T1 and T3
228 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000213 Segments Proposed to move Ferrules Location in T1 and T3 Segments MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0952,0971 Rev30
P-695, P-695A and P-697 Bored Pile Diameter and Pile MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0323 Rev. 30, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0341 (Rev.31) and
229 Structural P-695, P-695A and P-697 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000214 Cap Dimension P-695, P-695A and P-697 Bored Pile Diameter and Pile Cap Dimension MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0421 Rev. 31
Regarding the Engineer’s response/queries to the RFI with ref. NSCR-ADJV-N02-
230 Structural BR104 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000215 Permanent Structure Check (BR104) CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000135, please refer below for the Contractor’s answers. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
231 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000216 Request to Change Shape Bar Mark T02 The Contractor would like to propose straight bar (S) for T02. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1041, 1051, 1061
Request to Remove Bar Mark T03 in Bottom
232 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000217 Permanent Blister Request to Remove Bar Mark T03 in Bottom Permanent Blister MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1041, 1051, 1061
Request to Extend Legs Outer Shear Connector in

233 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000218 Track Slab Request to Extend Legs Outer Shear Connector in Track Slab No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Request to Extend Legs Outer Shear Connector in

234 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000219 Track Slab Longitudinal Bars for Diaphragm MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002, 1022
Re-arrangement of Track Slab Rebar in A1, T1M, and

235 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000220 T1 Segment Re-arrangement of Track Slab Rebar in A1, T1M, and T1 Segment MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0061 to 0062
Viaduct Pile cap, Pier and BR105 Pile cap, Pier and Pierhead Grade of Steel
236 Structural Pierhead NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000221 Reinforcement BR105 Pile cap, Pier and Pierhead Grade of Steel Reinforcement MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0032 & 0042
Proposed Reinforcement Detail for Block Out Proposed Reinforcement Detail for Block Out (600Ømm Soffit Access Opening) in
237 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000222 (600Ømm Soffit Access Opening) in Segmental Segmental MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0952
238 Structural P-612 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000223 Request to Relocate OCS Pole for P-612 Request to Relocate OCS Pole for P-612 No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Request to Change Shape of Bar Mark PB03 & PB09 in
239 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000224 Permanent Blister Request to Change Shape of Bar Mark PB03 & PB09 in Permanent Blister MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1081, 1082
Adjustment of Construction Joint (CJ) between Pile

240 Structural Viaduct Pile cap, Pier Column NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000225 Cap & Pier Columns Adjustment of Construction Joint (CJ) between Pile Cap & Pier Columns MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0401, 0421, 0471, 0491, 0501
241 Structural BR111 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000226 Permanent Structure Check (BR111) Permanent Structure Check (BR111) No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
242 Structural Genset Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000227 Confirmation of FGL and FFL at Genset Building Confirmation of FGL and FFL at Genset Building MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4611, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4506
Verification of Unidentified Rebar on Bottom Slab on Verification of Unidentified Rebar on Bottom Slab on PC Segmental
243 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000228 PC Segmental Reinforcement IFC Drawing Reinforcement IFC Drawing. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1021
Confirmation of F1 PILECAP Dimension at Genset

244 Structural Genset Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000229 Building Confirmation of F1 PILECAP Dimension at Genset Building MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4611, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4636
Clarification on Diameter Size of Bar Mark A32 and Bar

245 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000230 Mark A99 Clarification on Diameter Size of Bar Mark A32 and Bar Mark A99 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002
Design Strength of Concrete for Extradosed Bridge

246 Structural BR105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000231 (BR105) Design Strength of Concrete for Extradosed Bridge (BR105) MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0005 Rev31
Gabion Basket and Permanent Fence Details in MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0089~0091 MCRP-DWG-VIA02-RD-2009 MCRP-DWG-

247 Structural Permanent Fence NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000232 Swampy Area Gabion Basket and Permanent Fence Details in Swampy Area VIA02-RD-2015~2049
29 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
Confirmation of Ground Floor Structural and Finish Confirmation of Ground Floor Structural and Finish Floor Level (SFL and FFL) at
248 Structural Battery Post/ Ancillary Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000233 Floor Level (SFL and FFL) at Battery Post BP BP2-1 to Battery Post BP BP2-1 to BP2-4 MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3102, 3103, 3105, 3106, 3501
BP2-4
Confirmation of Ground Floor Structural and Finish Confirmation of Ground Floor Structural and Finish Floor Level (SFL and FFL) at MCRP-DWG-SS14-ST-4201, MCRP-DWG-SS15-ST-4201, MCRP-DWG-SS16-ST-
249 Structural Ancillary Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000234 Floor Level (SFL and FFL) at Substations SS14 to SS17 Substations SS14 to SS17 4201, MCRP-DWG-SS17-ST-4201, MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3102, 3103, 3501
Use of Tie Rod for Formworks System with 25mm

250 Structural Formworks NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000235 Diameter Tie Rod Use of Tie Rod for Formworks System with 25mm Diameter Tie Rod No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Clarification in Parapet Wall Dimensions – 30mm Drop

251 Structural Viaduct parapet Wall NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000236 Wall from the Top Slab Clarification in Parapet Wall Dimensions – 30mm Drop Wall from the Top Slab No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Request for Clarification IFC Drawing 1302 (OCS Pole

252 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000237 Reinforcement Detail) Request for Clarification IFC Drawing 1302 (OCS Pole Reinforcement Detail) MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1302
Clarification for the Exact Location of Drainage Hole

253 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000238 300Ø mm in A1 Segment The Contractor would like to propose location of 300Ø mm drainage hole MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1351,0902,0922,0942
Verification of Unidentified Rebar on Bottom Slab on Verification of Unidentified Rebar on Bottom Slab on Balance Cantilever Bridge
254 Structural Balance Cantilever NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000239 Balance Cantilever Bridge Reinforcement IFC Drawing Reinforcement IFC Drawing MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4085
255 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000240 Clarification on Quantity of Bar Mark T04 The contractor would like to clarify the quantity of Bar Mark T04. MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4081
MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0025, MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0042, MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-
256 Structural Viaduct Pier Heads NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000241 Seismic Restrainer Type Seismic Restrainer Type 4055 MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0015 Rev.31
The Contractor would like to propose to adapt bundled bars in order to prevent MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0321, -0322, -0323, -0324 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0341, -
257 Structural Viaduct Pile Cap NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000242 Bundled Bars at Soffit of Pile Cap in Bored Pile Section clashing and to meet the required quantity. 0342, -0343, -0344, -0345
258 Structural Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000243 Drainage Downpipe(200mm) Location in Piers Drainage Downpipe(200mm) Location in Piers MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0401,0421,0471,0491,0501,1351
Minimum Distance between Top Slab Drainage The Contractor would like to ask the Engineer if the minimum spacing can be less
259 Structural Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000244 (200mmØ) than 5000mm. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1351
Request to Clarify OCS Pole and Block out Location in Contrator wants to clarify several mismatching found between table and
260 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000245 Precast Segments drawings, both included in the document. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
261 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000246 P-596 to P-597 Deck Discrepancy P-596 to P-597 Deck Discrepancy MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0030, MCRP-DWG-CIS50-ST-0011, 0012
The Contractor would like to confirm if lightning arrester would still be required
262 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000247 Lightning Arrester in San Fernando Station in the piers and viaducts within the San Fernando Station (P-661 to P-605). MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0030, 0031, 0032 MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3202
Clarification about the Hook Orientation of Pier Starter MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0341, 0342, 0343, 0344, 0345 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0601,
263 Structural Viaduct Pier Column NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000248 Bar inside the Pile Cap Clarification about the Hook Orientation of Pier Starter Bar inside the Pile Cap. 0621, 0625, 0645, 0651, 0660, 0671, 0680, 0690 MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2041,
2045 MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4041, 4045, 4050
MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0030, MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0032, NSCR-ADJV-N02-
264 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000249 Lightning Arrester for P-597 and P-609 Lightning Arrester for P-597 and P-609 CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000106
Clarifications for B37 on Bottom Slab and Longitudinal MCRP-DWG-CIS40-ST-0031, MCRP-DWG-CIS40-ST-0032 MCRP-DWG-CIS50-ST-
265 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000250 Rebar Clarifications for B37 on Bottom Slab and Longitudinal Rebar 0031, MCRP-DWG-CIS50-ST-0032 MCRP-DWG-CIS70-ST-0031, MCRP-DWG-
CIS70-ST-0032
Confirmation of Clear Width of Stair/Hallway at ISER2 As per MCRP-DWG-ISER2-ST-4101, MCRP-DWG-ISER3-ST-4101 – clear width of MCRP-DWG-ISER2-ST-4101, MCRP-DWG-ISER3-ST-4101, MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-
266 Structural ISER-2 & ISER-3 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000251 and ISER3 Stair/Hallway is 2100mm. 3101,
MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3501
In reference to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000148, the suggested
Details of Preformed Compressible Material at San compressible material (polystyrene), will not confer a compressive characteristic
267 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000252 Fernando Station between the backfill soil layers (2-meters depth) and the steel columns No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
elements.
On the IFC Drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001, there is discrepancy on
268 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000253 Clarification on Quantity of Bar Mark A46 quantities of Bar Mark A46 for Type A1 between each side which has same MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001
length of area.
The Contractor wants to clarify some details in BR110 (P-597 to P-599SB)
superstructure and substructure as discussed in the following items below.
1. As mentioned in RFI response in NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000134 and
Clarifications for BR110 (P-597 to P-599SB) NSCR-GCR-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-CE-000001, P-599SB has a Pier Type of P6. Upon MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0491, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0922,
269 Structural P597 to P599SB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000254 Superstructure and Substructure checking concrete details of Pier Type P6 on MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0491 (refer to MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0022, MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0041
Figure 1), Table 1 shows “P-599” and not “P-595SB”. Please confirm the correct
dimensions.
2. As per Section 2 of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0922 (refer to Figure 2), the distance
between bearings of 6.3m wide box girder is 2.4m (1200mm +1200mm). On the
other hand, Plan of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0491 (refer
30 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
As per IFC Drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001, bar mark A99 for Type A1 is
hereby reflected on the top slab. However, referring to IFC Drawing No. MCRP-
270 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000255 Clarification on Bar Mark A99 DWG-VIA00-ST-1002, the said bar mark is not shown. Also, for Type A2 and A3, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002,
Bar Mark A99 shown on Top Slab of IFC Drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1021 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1021, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1022
but not reflected on IFC Drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1022.
On the IFC Drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1021, there is discrepancy with

271 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000256 Clarification on the Bar Shape of Bar Mark A09 the bar shape of Bar Mark A09 between one area and the others. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1021
Reason for RFI: On the IFC Drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1021, Bar Marks
272 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000257 Identification of Duplicated Bar Marks A28 and A29 A28 and A29 are duplicated. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1021
As per IFC drawing “MCRP-DWG-ALT02-PL-0012,00013,0019” the Contractor

notice that there are multiple tracks in one span and tracks that will cross with
273 Structural P591 to P594 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000258 Exact Location of Shear Connector with Multiple Tracks each other. Please refer to figure 1,2 and 3. In this case, the Contractor would MCRP-DWG-ALT02-PL-0012,00013,0019
like to ask the Engineer for the exact shear connector location when one track
will merge to another track.
The Contractor would like to propose to slightly change the orientation of edge
P-598NB Bearing Layout and Box Girder Edge of girders at Pier P-598NB. To be similar with the general procedure of the
274 Structural P598 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000259 Orientation Precast Segmental box girder, the edge of girders in P-598NB are proposed to be MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0030
perpendicular to the alignment.
1. In reference to the RFI no. NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000109 the
Engineer’s response ”20mm x 20mm chamfers are applicable only to all exposed
sharp corners of concrete structures above ground”.
Clarification on Chamfer Details in Pier Column and The Contractor would like to confirm the following chamfer for typical piers:
275 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000260 Pier Head a) 20mm x 20 mm chamfer will apply on all the sides of top pier head except the MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0501
vertical corner of the seismic upstand (refer to highlighted RED color in figure 1).
b) 150mm x 150 mm chamfer on vertical corner of the pier head (refer to
highlighted ORANGE color in figure 1).
c) 500mm x 500 mm chamfer on pier column.
In the IFC Drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002, there is a discrepancy on the

area where the Bar Mark A27 will be installed as shown in figure 1.
“a)” distance is from inner diaphragm until the outer face of the web while “b)”
276 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000261 Clarification on the Arrangement of Bar Mark A27 distance is from inner diaphragm to inside of the web. Thus, the Contractor MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002
would like to confirm to the Engineer which of these two distances will govern
and please provide exact distance where the bar mark A27 will be arranged.
The Contractor would like to clarify with regards to the orientation of the hooks
Clarification on the Orientation of Hooks Upon upon installing the Bar Mark T05 in the segment as follows:
277 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000262 Staggering of Bar Mark T05 -For segment T1M: Since BM T05 is in bundle, the hooks of the said BM will be MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1041, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1051
staggered.
On the IFC Drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001, there is discrepancy on
278 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000263 Clarification on Quantity of Bar Mark A02 quantities of Bar Mark A02 for Type A1 between each side which has same MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001
length of area.
279 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000264 Modification of Bar Marks A04 and A09 Contractor would like to request to modify on Bar Marks A04 and A09 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001
The length of exposed main rebars of Emergency Staircase haven’t been seen in
280 Structural Emergency Staircase NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000265 Length of Exposed Main Rebars of Emergency MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1653 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1653
Staircase Bored Piles
The Contractor would like to propose to slightly change the orientation of edge
P-597 and P-609 Bearing Layout and Box Girder Edge of girders at Pier P-597. To be similar with the general procedure of the Precast
281 Structural P597 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000266 Orientation Segmental box girder, the edge of girders (CIS50-3 and 6.3m wide PSM) at MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0030
northbound side of P-597 are proposed to be perpendicular to the alignment.
The Contractor would like to modify the shape of Bar Mark A50 and A47 for Type
282 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000267 Modification of Bar Marks A50 and A47 A1 segment. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001
In Technical Specification the texture of the deck slab and finishes for formed
concrete for exposed surfaces will be specified in the contract documents.
Texture of Deck Slab and Finishes for Formed Concrete However, the Contractor does not have clear information of the concrete
283 Structural CIS40, CIS50 & CIS70 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000268 of CIS No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
finishes and texturing for exposed surface from Drawing series CP N-02
ST_CIS40, CP N-02 ST_CIS50, CP N-02 ST_CIS70.
As per MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0031 (refer to Figure 1), Pier P-596 has CIS50-9 on MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0031, MCRP-DWG-CIS50-ST-0013,
284 Structural P596 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000269 P-596 Pierhead Concrete and Reinforcement Details decreasing side and CIS50-3 on increasing side. CIS50-9 and CIS50-3 have depths MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0471, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0648
of 2400mm and 3000mm respectively.
31 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
The Contractor propose to modify the spacing of rebars on segments with block
Modification on Spacing of Rebars in Segments’ Top outs such as drainage, access manholes, etc. This is to avoid excessive cutting of
285 Structural Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000270 and Bottom Slab rebars and to expedite the rebar installation works. Spacing of rebars will varies No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
between 110 mm to 200 mm.
Referring to RFI 000202, the proposal to change the bar shape of Bar Mark TB03
286 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000271 Modification of the Height of Bar Mark TB03 from shape FZ to shape T was accepted. In line with this, the Contractor would No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
like to modify the height of these rebars.
Referring to the response of RFI No. NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000261, the

distance of the area where the said Bar Mark will be installed is from the inner
287 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000272 Clarification on the Quantity of Bar Mark A27 face of diaphragm to the outer face of the web. In line with this, the quantity of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002
Bar Mark A27 will be 48 by using 150mm spacing. This will conflict the quantity
of the said Bar Mark on IFC Drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002.
As agreed in the interface meeting, E&M Contractor CP NS-01 shall supply and
carry out electrical conductor system works, while the Contractor shall supply
and install PVC ducts for the lightning arrester. As per RFI no. NSCR-ADJV-N02-
CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000106, the Engineer’s response in Note 2, “all conduits and
288 Structural Lightning Arrester NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000273 Draw String for the Lightning Arrester ducts to be provided with suitable draw strings”. The Contractor wants to clarify No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
if we are the one who will supply the draw strings to be installed together with
the PVC ducts. If yes, please provide detailed specifications and drawings for
procurement process
and installation.
In reference to the RFI response “NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000194”, the
Contractor understand that drainage hole in top slab will only be needed where
there is a Ø200mm downpipe drainage. However, to pour concrete to the
bottom slab of the segment the concrete hose should go thru the top slab
Considering Drainage Hole for all T Segments (T1, T2, (please refer to figure 1). So, the Contractor would like to propose to consider
289 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000274 T3 & T1M) MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1041,1051,1061
this hole in all T segments (T1, T2, T3 & T1M). The additional reinforcement will
also be considered (refer to figure 2). If the bottom slab is casted, the segments
that is not required to have top drainage hole will be casted together with the
top slab.
The
In TSContractor
206.18-1 iswould like tothat
mentioned ask the
the Engineer
maximumif tolerance
this proposal is acceptable.
for the position of a
Shear Key is ±6mm. However, it has been encountered that, in one of the mould,
there is one shear key that the outer face is moved 10mm (Figure 2). Contractor
would like to ask the Engineer if this tolerance for position shear key could be
acceptable based on the following reasons.
290 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000275 Request for Position of Shear Key Tolerance 1. The main function of the shear keys is to facilitate fitting of the segment MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0802, 0804
during erection. Since short-line casting method is applied for fabrication,
perfect match-cast face can be achieved even 10mm of shifting of shear key.
2. The second function of the shear keys is to transfer shear load. Except 10mm
of shifting of shear key, total number, dimension and angle of shear key will be
maintained so that the shear capacity of web can be achievable.
On the IFC Drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001, there is a discrepancy on
the details of Bar Mark A07 which denotes on Plan – Bottom Slab that its Bar
291 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000276 Clarification on Bar Shape of Bar Mark A07 Shape is VV while on the IFC Drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002, Section 2 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST- 1001, 1002
shows that the said Bar Mark is a straight bar.
Furthermore, on the Engineer’s response on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-
000273, the Contractor would like to ask for more details regarding draw strings
Details of Draw Strings (G.I. Tie Wire #12) for Lightning (G.I. Tie wires #12) for lightning arrester cables.
292 Structural Lightning Arrester NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000277 Arrester Cables 1. Length of extension of draw string (G.I. Tie wires #12) from the end of PVC No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
pipe (on top of pier head and on top of pile cap).
2. Details of accessory to connect the draw string (G.I. Tie wires #12) to the
lightning arrester cable.
As per MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0036, two spans (P-646 to P-648) have both fixed
restrainer type (clouded with blue in Figure 1). On the other hand, the
Contractor understands that each span should have one movable and one fixed
restrainer type. Hence, one of the restrainers in each span mentioned should be
293 Structural P647 to P649 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000278 Seismic Restrainer Type of Piers P-647 to P-649 change to Movable type. If the assumption above is correct, the Contractor MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0036
would like to propose to change the seismic restrainer types on Piers P-647 to P-
649 as marked with red in Figure 1. The reason for this is to minimize the
translation by moving the M-M type of seismic restrainer to Pier P-649 which has
shorter span of 35m on both sides. Please advise us if the proposal is acceptable.
If yes, please specify the girder nominal gap.
An Inquiry on Using Hydraulic Hammer for Carrying As per ASTM D4945 “Standard Test Method for High-Strain Dynamic Test of
294 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000279 Out PDA Test Deep Foundations”, single acting Hydraulic Hammer (Pile Driving Hammer) can No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
be used for High-Strain Dynamic Test
In addition to Engineer’s response on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000241,

Girder Nominal Gap between CIS40-8 and the Contractor would like to ask for the length of girder nominal gap (cloud with
295 Structural P698 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000280 Maintenance Ramp blue in Figure 1) on P-698 between the CIS40-8 and the maintenance MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0042
ramp which both have movable seismic restrainer.
32 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
The Contractor submitted the BR105 Erection Engineering Analysis (with

Camber Application for Concrete Towers of Extradosed reference NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-TDC-D-000012) to the Engineer. On the said
296 Structural Bridge 105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000281 Bridge document, longitudinal displacements of pylons are shown (refer to Figure 1). No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
The maximum displacement is 88mm.
In reference to the Engineer’s responses on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-

000008 (Bearing Detail), NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000152 (Gap Between
the Deck and Pier Head) and NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000205 (Pier
Heights) the Contractor would like to have a fixed values for heights of lower
297 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000282 Bearing Details of Precast Segments grout pad and bearing plinth (refer to yellow cells on Figure 2 to Figure 4) MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0801
depending on the type of elastomeric bearing pad and length of span. On the
other hand, upper grout pad will be variable (refer to letters A to D in Figure 1 to
Figure 4) depending on the longitudinal slope.
On the IFC Drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001, there is a discrepancy on

the sequence of rebar assembly between the bars shown in Section 3 and 4, and
the same bars shown in the Section 1 of IFC Drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-
Clarification on Assembling Order of Rebars on PC 1002. Referring to Figures 1 and 2 (highlighted in Red), the Bar Mark A21 is the
298 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000283 Segment Type A1 Top Slab outmost bar in the Top Layer while in the Figure 3, the said Bar Mark is below MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001, 1002
Bar Marks A33 and A12. As well as the bars at the bottom layer of the Top Slab,
in Figure 1 (highlighted in Blue), the Bar Mark A20 is above of the transverse bar
while in the Figure 3, this Bar Mark is the outmost bar.
Referring to RFI No. ST-000262, the hooks of Bar Mark T05 should be all in the
upper part which would make an congestion in the Top Slab. Due to this, the
Contractor proposed to modify the shape of Bar Mark T05 as follows, NSCR-
299 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000284 Modification of Bar Mark T05 ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000284 Instead of having hooks at the corner, we will No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
have splicing as the figure shown. Splicing of hooks inside the bundle should be
staggered.
In the IFC Drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001, there is discrepancy on the

300 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000285 Clarification on Quantity of Bar Marks A14 and A15 quantity of Bar Marks A14 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001
and A15 between the two Sections.
In order to improve the steel rebar assembly, the Contractor would like to
propose some changes in the shape of the reinforcements in Segment Type A1,
same as proposed in RFI No. ST-00085.
301 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000286 Modification of Rebars in Segment Type A1 1. The Bar Marks A01 and A05 on the bottom slab of Segment Type A1 are MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001, 1002
proposed to change by combining into a single stirrup with staggered
arrangement.
Specification for fasteners According to steelwork notes of MCRP-DWG-BR110-

ST-0061, fabrication, erection and corrosion protection of steelwork shall be in
302 Structural Bridge 110 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000287 Galvanizing of Fasteners accordance with the project specification. Moreover, the following grades of MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0061
steelwork shall be used for steel box girder over San Fernando station.
The Contractor request to clarify followings:

1. We would like to propose dimension change of the PVC gutter as follows for
the precast segments, deck of Cast in-situ bridge, Balanced cantilever bridge and
303 Structural Drainage System NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000288 Clarification on Drainage Pipe Detail steel box girder bridges due to the manufacturing process. It is sure that the MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1351
purpose of the double layer to prevent the leakage between gutter and the
connected pipe is still achievable regardless of the change.
With reference NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000288, the Contractor proposed

304 Structural Drainage System NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000288 Clarification on Drainage Pipe Detail the details of a PVC gutter as follows: MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1351
As per MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0152 Rev. 32, diameter of seismic restrainer pin for

BR105 Main Piers is 865mm (refer to Figure 1 boxed with red). However, on MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0152 Rev.32,
305 Structural Bridge 105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000289 BR105 Main Piers Seismic Restrainer Pin Diameter Section C of MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0412 Rev. 32, the hole diameter for seismic MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0412 Rev.32,
restrainer pin for Main Piers is 740mm (refer to Figure 2 boxed with blue) only MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0414 Rev.31,
which is smaller than the 865mm pin diameter mentioned above.
In the segment A1 in IFC drawings MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001 and 1002, the bar

mark A08 appears in the bottom slab plan and in section 1 (refer to figure 1 and
306 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000290 Clarification on Location and Quantity of Bar Mark A08 2) of the mentioned segment. The Contractor would like to ask the Engineer if MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001, 1002
our understanding about the location and number of rebars is correct or not.
33 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
The Contractor notice that for A1 segment the reinforcement for the chamfer is
missing (refer to figure 1 below). In this matter, the Contractor would like to ask
Reinforcement for Chamfer in Diaphragm Segment if this understanding is correct. Consequently, the Contractor would like to
307 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000291 Type A1 propose reinforcement for the chamfer (refer to figure 2 below). The Contractor MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002
would like to ask the Engineer if the proposal is acceptable before implementing
in the shop drawing.
On the IFC Drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001, there are discrepancies on

the shapes of Bar Marks A22 and A23 which denotes on the description as shape
308 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000292 Clarification on Bar Shapes of Bar Marks A22 and A23 LL and S, respectively. While on the IFC Drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001, 1002
in Segment Type A1 it shows that their shapes were swapped.
In the IFC Drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001 Plan – Top Slab, Bar Mark A17
Modification on Shape of Bar Marks A17 and A12 in is to be placed along the red arrow shown on below figure 1. Referring to the
309 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000293 Flat Portion of Slab for Type A1 Segment same figure, the contractor proposed to modify shape of the Bar Marks A17 and MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001, 1002
A12 on the area.
Clarification for Emergency Staircase ES-6 Bored Pile Based on IFC Drawing MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1659, Emergency Staircase ES-6
310 Structural ES-6 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000294 Quantity composed of 6 units of 1000mm dia. bored piles. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1659
Based on IFC Drawing MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1653 bored pile section details as

shown below, Emergency Staircase ES, bar mark P02 has 14pcs of diameter
Clarification for Emergency Staircase Bored Pile Rebar 40mm rebar but the particular drawing sections have 20pcs shaded dots
311 Structural Emergency Staircase NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000295 Details MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1653
representing its vertical main bar. Also, referring to its bored pile elevation, 14
pcs of 40mm dia. rebar with bar mark P02 are equally spaced.
In the Segment Type A1, the contractor would like to modify the shape of Bar
312 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000296 Modification of Bar Marks A11 and A27 Marks A11 and A27. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001, 1002
1. HDPE with Helical (or Spiral) Rib The Contractor would like to clarify whether
the outer HDPE pipe should be provided with helical rib as shown in following
figure or the smooth surface HDPE or any other surface type of HDPE the
313 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000297 Stay Cable Sheathing Details Engineer want the Contractor to follow. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
2. Sheath Colouring It is written that “The colour of HDPE shall be as instructed
by the Engineer”. Please instruct the Contractor that which colour of HDPE
should be applied to BR105.
It is written in the specification that Field Monitroing System is used by the

Contractor for geometric control and monitoring during construction, which is
thought that the field monitoring system shall be removed after the
construction.
314 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000298 Field Monitoring System Clarification No.1; However, it is well known that the bridge health monitoring No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
system is ncessary for the cable supported bridge during the operation stage.
Therefore, it is kindly requested to clarify whether or not the Employer has the
intention to utilize the field monitoring system as the bridge health monitoring
system.
In reference to the RFI no. NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000109 the Engineer’s
response ”20mm x 20mm chamfers are applicable only to all exposed sharp
corners of concrete structures above ground”.
315 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000299 Clarification on Chamfer Details for P3 and P5D The Contractor wants to clarify further intended chamfer details for pier type P3: No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
a) 20mm x 20 mm chamfer will apply on all the sides of top pier head (refer to
highlighted RED color in figure 1)
b) 150mm x 150mm chamfer on vertical corner of the pier head (refer to
Specification for Painting
highlighted ORANGE colorColour; According
in figure 1) to steelwork notes of MCRP-DWG-
BR110-ST-0061, paint colour for all exterior surfaces of the bridge steel box is to
316 Structural Bridge 110 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000300 Steel Box Painting Colour be confirmed and paint colour for all interior surfaces of the bridge steel box is MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0061
light grey.
Referring to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000267, the proposal of longitudinal

bars to hold the said Bar Mark is not mentioned in the response. Hence, the
contractor would like to propose longitudinal bars to hold Bar Mark A47 as
Modification on Spacing of Bar Mark A47 and working bars, refer to the clouded red on the figure below. In line with this, the MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001
317 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000301 Additional Working Bars contractor would like to propose arrangement of Bar Mark A47, spacing
between 110mm to 200mm, as shown in the figure below to avoid clashing with
the PT ducts.
34 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
As mentioned by the Engineer, it is correct that the changes in the design

strength of the concrete is for the Contractor’s convenience and not required in
the original design. Therefore it is confirmed that NO additional Time and Cost
Design Strength of Concrete for Extradosed Bridge incurred to the Contract due to this change. Regarding the verification of the
318 Structural Bridge 105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000302 (BR105) MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0005 Rev31
rigidity ratio of the entire bridge due to the changes in the concrete strength, the
Contractor will re-do the stage by stage analysis with 50 MPa and provide the
comparison table for the Engineer’s references.
Contractor would like to clarify to the Engineer the following points regarding
Clarification for Final Location Lightning Arrester in location of lightning arrester in segments:
319 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000303 Segments 1. Ligtning arrester should be placed in last segment of the Span (, as reflected in DWG-VIA00-ST-1901 Rev. 32
Drawing MRCP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1901 Rev. 32 included in RFI - 151
The Contractor received MCRP-RFI-BR105-ST-0021 Rev.A through NSCR-ADJV-

N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000304 Rev.B.
320 Structural Bridge 105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000304 Bored Pile Details – BR-105 We found that there is still discrepancy regarding longitudinal rebar mark MCRP-RFI-BR105-ST-0021 Rev.A
between BORED PILE DETAILS (V4) and SECTION B-B (V2) in MCRP-RFI-BR105-ST-
0021 Rev.A.
With reference to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000237, response number 2 is

for fixing details, T19 and T22 shall be extended to the front of the manhole, and
Modification on Shape of Bar Mark T23 on OCS Pole of T23 shall be extended to the inside of the web.
321 Structural OCS Pole NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000305 Segment Type A1 No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000305 In line with this, the contractor would
like to confirm if the understanding is correct.
As shown on the MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3101 Rev. 32 - General Substation Floor
Plan, Reflected Ceiling Plan andRoof Plan, recently issued, we have observed the
re-orientation of columns along Gridlines -Y01-Y02/X01 and -Y01-Y02/X08, and
Confirmation of Structural Layout at Substations SS14 the Entrance Lobby (see Figure 1). Hence, we have not received any updated MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3101 Rev. 32, MCRP-DWG-SS14-ST-4101 Rev. 30,
322 Structural SS14 to SS17 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000306 to SS17 plans for Structural. Latest structural drawings on hand are: MCRP-DWG-SS15-ST-4101 Rev. 30, MCRP-DWG-SS16-ST-4101 Rev. 30,
1. MCRP-DWG-SS14-ST-4101 Rev. 30, MCRP-DWG-SS14-ST-4201 Rev. 30 MCRP-DWG-SS16-ST-4101 Rev. 30
2. MCRP-DWG-SS15-ST-4101 Rev. 30, MCRP-DWG-SS15-ST-4201 Rev. 30
We would like to request the re-confirmation of the final layout of the
Compressible Material on the Column Concrete Encasement areas. As per MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4121_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4201 to 4202_Rev.30,
Confirmation of Detail of Compressible Material along coordination thru a separate platform, the Engineer provided a sketch showing MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4401_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3101 Rev.D,
323 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000307 Steel Column at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3401 to 3403 Rev.D, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3531 Rev.B,
the arrangement of the 2 x 2 meter concrete encasement and a 100mm thick
Compressible Material along its perimeter. MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3533 Rev.30
With regards to the drawings with ref. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1201 Rev. 31

provided to the Contractor in advace, the Contractor would like to clarify
followings.
Clarfication No.1:
324 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000308 Temporary Stressing Bars for Precast Segmental Bridge 1. It is normally recommended by the PT bar suppliers that the maximum stress MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1201 Rev. 31
of the PT bars should be less than 50% of characteristic failing load (Nomial
Tensile Strength)
2. The Nomial Tensile Strength of D29mm VSL CT Stress bar is 715kN and the
required stressing force 500kN, which is higher than 50%.
Clarification of Reinforcement Details for Pier Head As per drawing reference no. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0491, isometric view shows MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0491, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0651,
325 Structural Pier Head NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000309 Type P6 two different elevations for the top of pier head. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0652
With regards to the drawings with ref. MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-405 and 406, the
Contractor would like to get the approval regarding following issues from the
Engineer. The Contractor understands that the web thickness of BR105 is
changed from 400mm to 350mm between segment F and E as shown in figure 1.
326 Structural Bridge 105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000310 BR105 Web Thickness In this case, it is not possible to operate the inner form, since some portion of MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-405 and 406
inner forms are required to be anchored in the previous segment. As shown in
the figure, there should be empty space.
Figure 1; In order to resolve this, the Contractor would like to propose that the
joint where the web thickness is changed from 400mm to 350mm could be
moved
Pier to just
P-698 before
is used the construction
to connect joint between
10.3m precast segment F&and G (green
CIS70 line),side)
(increasing so that
the inner
and CIS40form can be fit
(decreasing to the
side). previous
As per segment.
IFC “MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0422 to 0423
Rev.31” you can find bearing arrangement for P-698 refer to figure 1.
1. For the decreasing chainage the Contractor followed the IFC “MCRP-DWG-
CIS40-ST-0012 Rev.30” and for the increasing chainage since it has 2 types of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0422 to 0423 Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-CIS40-ST-0012 Rev.30,
327 Structural P698 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000311 Bearing Arrangement at P698 bridge, we followed MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0423 Rev.31 and MCRP-DWG-ALT02- MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0081, MCRP-DWG-ALT02-SK-0005 Rev.30
SK-0005 Rev.30 as shown in figure 2 & 3. However, bearing for CIS70 fall off on
the pier head (refer to figure 3).
2. Another situation is done using information IFC “MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0081”
CIS70 and 10.3m wide box has 7650mm distance (refer to figure 4), the bearing
for CIS70 fall off on the pier head (refer to figure 5). Considering the 2 situations
as per IFC, the bearing arrangement on the mentioned pier is not correct. The
35 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
In the IFC Drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001, the Contractor understands

328 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000312 Modification of the Shape of Bar Mark A02 that Bar Mark A02 on the top layer of bottom slab would possibly clashed with MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001
the PT ducts.
As per IFC dwg “MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2081” laps in longitudinal reinforcement

should be staggered. The Contractor would like to propose longitudinal
Longitudinal Reinforcement Lap Spliced in reinforcement for superstructure only to increase by factor 1.3 the laps shown in MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2081, MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-4081
329 Structural BC01 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000313 Superstructure (BC01 & BC03) table 1(refer to figure 2) instead of arranging it staggered. The Contractor would
like to ask the Engineer if the proposal is acceptable.
As per Engineer’s response on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000106, lightning

arrester will be located on the centerline of pier at 230mm from the side of the
column and pier head (refer to Figure 1). However, the said location will most
330 Structural Lightning Arrester NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000314 Lightning Arrester Location on Pier likely cannot be achieved since there are vertical bars in the centerline of pier No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
(refer to Figure 2). Due to this clashing, the Contractor would like to ask if a
tolerance of ±100mm (refer to blue dimensions on Figure 1) from the centerline
of pier is acceptable.
1. The Contractor notice that table for development length is not provided in the
IFC drawing for BR105-Extradosed bridge. The Contractor would like to ask the
Engineer to provide table for development length.
2. As per IFC dwg “MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0452” in note 1, laps not shown should
Longitudinal Reinforcement Lap Spliced in be staggered (refer to figure 2). The Contractor would like to propose
331 Structural Bridge 105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000315 Superstructure (Extradosed Bridge - BR105) MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0451 and 0452
longitudinal reinforcement for superstructure only to increase by factor 1.3 the
laps length that will be provided by the Engineer instead of arranging it
staggered. The Contractor would like to ask the Engineer if the proposal is
acceptable.
The contractor would like to propose the change of shape in Bar Mark A08 from
shape QZ to shape S, refer to figures below. (NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-
332 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000316 Modification on Shape of Bar Mark A08 000316). This would help to install easily the other bars which will not be No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
obstructed by the hook of Bar Mark A08 as shown below.
The contractor wants to clarify reponse on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-

000290 which shows that quantity of Bar Mark A27 is 24 pieces on each side. See
333 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000317 Clarification on Quantity of Bar Mark A27 figure 1 below. While in our previous RFI regarding the quantity of the said Bar No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Mark, NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000272, it was responded that this should
be 48 numbers on each side instead of 40.
1. Based on IFC Drawing MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0342, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-

0343, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0344, and MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0345, bar mark B7
will be distributed in both ways with spacing ’X1’ center-to-center. The
Contractor’s understanding is that tie bar B7 will be installed in both directions MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0342, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0343
334 Structural Pile Cap NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000318 Clarification for Bar Mark B7 in Pile Cap with required spacing ’X1’ except inside the bored pile location since the pile MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0344, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0345
starter bar and hoop ring (as per RFI-ST-000133) reinforcement bar were present
that will complement the steel area. In this regard, the Contractor woulid like to
ask the Engineer if the understanding is correct.
The Contractor’s understanding is that Bar Mark T19 would possibly clashed with
the trumplate as shown below, NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000319.
335 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000319 Modification of the shape of Bar Mark T19 in OCS Pole Figure 1. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1302: To avoid this clashing, the Contractor MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1302
proposes to modify shape of Bar Marks T19-02 and T19-03, as reflected on
Figure 3 below, from staight bars (shape S) to shape J.
As shown on MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1091 Rev. 30 (refer to Figure 1), TB03 has 6

nos. On the other hand, from the latest MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1091 Rev. 31,
MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1092 Rev. 30, and MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1093 Rev. 30,
(refer to Figure 2 to Figure 4), TB03 is reduced to 3 nos. However, as per the MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1091 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1091 Rev.31,
336 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000320 Temporary Blister Reinforcement MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1092 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1093 Rev.30
recommendation of PT-Bar supplier (Freyssinet), 3 nos. of TB03 are not enough
for anti-bursting, thus, 2 additional reinforcements are needed.
The Contractor hereby propose to implement 2 additional reinforcements (refer
to color red reinforcements on Figure 5) as per the recommendation of
Freyssinet. Please confirm. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0601, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0621,
As per IFC Drawing MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0601, the top level of column main bar
337 Structural Pier Head NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000321 Proposal of Column Main Bar Arrangement hook shows a clear distance of 300mm from the top of pier head. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0625, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0645,
MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0651, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0671
Based on IFC Drawing MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0471 as shown below figure, pier
338 Structural P572 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000322 Clarification of P-572 Portal Pier Head Dimension no. P-572 portal pier head dimension is 18659mm x 4000mm. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0471, MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0028
36 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
As per response on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000260, the Engineer

confirm that vertical edges of seismic restrainer upstand on “Item 1.a)” do not
Chamfer of Vertical Edges of Seismic Restrainer have chamfer and for “Item 2.a)”, which is for Pier Type P7 should have a
339 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000323 Upstand No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
chamfer of 20mm x 20mm (refer to Figure 1). Additionally, as per response on
NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000299, the Engineer do not have objection on
the Contractors understanding that the vertical edges of seismic restrainer
In segments type T2/T3, from segment 4 to 13, there is clashing between PT
340 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000324 Clashing of PT Ducts with Temporary Blister in ducts and rebars intended for temporary blister. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1136, 1137
Segments T2 &T3
Same as stated on RFI No. ST-000286, the hooks of Bar Mark A29 make an
congestion in the Top Slab. Due to this, the Contractor proposed to modify the
341 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000325 Modification of Bar Mark A29 shape of the said Bar Mark as follows, Instead of having hooks at the corner, we No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
will have splicing as the figure shown. Splicing of hooks inside the bundle should
be staggered.
Information Requested:
1. FGL (Finished Ground Level), Pile Cap Level (Pile cut-off Level) and Earthwork
Drawings (Cross Section and Longitudinal Section Drawings) for Pile Caps with MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0080 ~ 0091, 0101 ~ 0112,
Finished Ground Level, Earthwork Drawings and consideration of actual (surveyed) Ground Elevation. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0061, 0401, 0421, 0424, 0460,
342 Structural P506 to P825 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000326 Revised Drawings of Pile Cap, Drainage and 2. FGL (FGE), Earthwork Drawings (Cross Section and Longitudinal Section 0471, 0472, 0491, 0501 & 0510,
Maintenance Road between P-506 to P-825 Drawings) for Drainage and all revised Drainage Drawings with consideration of MCRP-DWG-VIA02-RD-2003 ~ 2007A, 2015 ~ 2049,
actual (surveyed) Ground Elevation and existing Road Elevation. MCRP-DWG-VIA02-DR-0059 ~ 3013
3. Finished Road Level, Earthwork Drawings (Cross section and Longitudinal
Section Drawings) for maintenance road and all revised maintenance drawings
with consideration
Contractor of actual
would like (surveyed)
to clarify differentGround
queriesElevation and existing
in permanent blister: Road
Elevation.
1. After checking the response in RFI-000021, our understanding is that in point 1
there is a typo error and should be: The segment type of segment number 4 and
13 is Type BB2M, as it is clarify in point 4. Please confirm.
343 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000327 Request for Clarification in Type of Permanent Blister 2. In drawing MRCP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0991, as reflected in picture below, it seems MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-821 Rev.30, 991
that: - When the thickness of the wall is 500 mm, the permanent blister type
should be BB2
- When the thickness of the wall is 350 mm, the permanent blister type should
be BB2M, therefore segments T1(5) and T1(6) should be also BB2M. Please
confirm if the Contractor’s understanding is correct or not.
The Contractor would like to weld a temporary attachment on the vertical
reinforcement of the pier to hold the reinforcements firmly while the pile cap
concrete pouring is on-going (refer to Figure 1 and Figure 2).
344 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000328 Welding of Vertical Reinforcements of Piers To ensure that it will have no adverse effect, weldable reinforcement will be No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
used, and the temporary attachment will be removed after the pile cap
hardened. Please let us know if this is acceptable.
The contractor is requesting confirmation on the following matters:
1) In MCRP-DWG-CIS50-ST-0012 table 2, the bottom width of the bottom flange
is not matching with the sum of the openings and diaphragm wall thickness as
seen in MCRP-DWG-CIS50-ST-0015 table 4, creating a discrepancy of 60mm. To
345 Structural CIS50 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000329 Orientation of the Openings in Diaphragm of CIS50 avoid this discrepancy, it is assumed that the Owt as seen in table 4 will be taken MCRP-DWG-CIS50-ST-0011, 0012, 0014, 0015
as a skewed dimension, and from this point the walls will be perpendicular to the
centerline of the pier head. The Iwt, will also be taken perpendicular to the
centerline of the pier head. Kindly confirm non objection with the orientation of
the wall openings in the diaphragms which are perpendicular to the center line
As per response on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000108,” No restriction of a

construction joint in the Hinge Zone of the piers, but no splicing or couplers in
the reinforcement. No objection to a normal” kicker” type construction joint (say
346 Structural Pile Cap and Pier Column NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000330 Construction Joint Between Pile Cap and Pier Column 100mm high), properly prepared i.e., needle gunned etc.” The Contractor would No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
like to ask if it is acceptable to avoid construction of kicker between the pile cap
and pier column due to the construction purposes.
The contractor is requesting clarifications on the following matters:

1) The positions of the bearings shown in the IFC drawings for the steel box
girder (MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0041, 0061, see figure 2) differs from the ones
Clarification in Pier Head Geometry and Bearing shown in the pier type P5D details (MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0447, 0448, see figure MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0041, 0061
347 Structural P597 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000331 Locations of P597 1). Kindly clarify the correct reference for the location of the bearings in P597 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0447, 0448,0473
and confirm if the pier column centerline should be matching with the steel box
girder centerline.
• Following the IFC drawings BR110, the distance acquired from the set-out point
1 to the first bearing of the steel box bridge (measured perpendicularly from
centerline of pier head, L2, see figure 1) is 8.334m, while the distance from pier
Upon
column comparing
CL to steelthe Floor
box Plan
girder CLinisMCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3101
50mm, see figure 2 Rev.30 against
Setting Out Points provided
Detail of Structural Column Layout at Signaling House in the MCRP-DWG-S/A-AR-3041 Rev.32 (see Figure 1), the building seems MCRP-DWG-S/A-AR-3041 Rev.32, MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3101 Rev.30,
348 Structural ISER-2 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000332 ISER2 MCRP-DWG-ISER2-ST-4101 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-ISER2-ST-4311 Rev.30
reduced from its original size,
using the provided coordinates.
37 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
Refernce is made to RFI dated 21st July 2021 with Ref. NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-
RFI-ST-000092.
It is kindly requested that the Engineer could provide following information in
Design Report of Precast Segmental Construction order for the Contractor to expedite the submission of the proposal that the pile
349 Structural Swampy Area NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000333 Section in Swampy Area cap level in swampy area is proposed to be changed. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
1. Design Report for the Pile
✓ The Contractor would like to understand the design concept of the piles.
✓ The Contractor would like to understand the boundary condition of the piles.
✓ The Contractor would like to understand how the Designer establishe the
modeling of these section.
The Contractor would like to ask for 4 matters regarding the deck widening.
1. As per response in “NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSF-RFI-QA-000004 Locations of Deck
Widening”, the table below are the locations of the deck widening. Please
confirm if this is still the latest version. If not, please provide. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1500 Rev. 31
350 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000334 Deck Widening 2. As shown on MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1500 Rev. 31, the outline of the deck MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1501 Rev. 31
widening in plan view is trapezoidal in shape (refer to blue line on Figure 2).
However, on MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1501 Rev. 31, the outline of deck widening is
in rectangular shape (refer to blue lines on Figure 3), which is not matching with
the previous drawing. Please clarify what outline should be used.
During the demoulding of segment the Contractor notice the spalling of the
Modification of Top Permanent Blister Geometry TB1 concrete in top blister. Due to this the Contractor would like to add a chamfer of
351 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000335 in 10.3m width 80x10mm as shown in figure 2 and 3. The Contractor would like to ask the MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0991
Engineer if the proposal is acceptable.
Contractor would like to clarify the quantity of Bar Mark A28 which is only 2
352 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000336 Clarification on the Quantity of Bar Mark A28 numbers per side but in our understanding, it should be 7 numbers on each side MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST- 1001, 1002
to avoid possible spalls on the time of demolding the segment.
Referring to IFC Drawing MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4012, bored pile section 1 shows

20 pairs (bundled) of bar marks P02 and P03 rebars and 20 pcs each on section
Clarifications for P02 and P03 Main Rebar 2. See below figure 1.
353 Structural BC03 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000337 Arrangement Figure 1. Section 1 and Section 2 However, in the below table pier nos. P-468 MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4012_Rev.31
and P-469 consists of 28 numbers of bar mark P02 and P03, respectively on
Section 1 while 28 numbers for bar mark P03 only on Section 2.
Based on IFC Drawing MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0602 (View 1), 4 sets of 2 pcs each

of bar mark P20-N20-KZ are positioned in both corners in short direction, as
Clarification of Reinforcement Details in Pier Head shown in below figure A but on Section 2 in figure B, P20 is reflected throughout MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0601_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0602_Rev.30
354 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000338 Type P1 and P2 the long direction based on the arrow provided (red). Thus, the Contractor
would like to ask for clarification regarding this matter.
According to the RFI response of NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000322, “The

length of the portal beam shall be 18659, with reference to the dimension
confirmation below in the bearing layout shown in DWG No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-
ST-0447 (Rev.30) and -0448 (Rev.31).” In this regard, the general arrangement
(span layout) found in IFC Drawing MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0028 will be amended,
355 Structural P572 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000339 Request for Coordinates of P-572 Bored Piles that is, the position of the below structures (columns, pile cap and bored piles) No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
shall be adjusted to meet the 750mm extended horizontal distance (both sides)
from the edge of the column to the edge of pier head (bottom level). See below
marks in the figure. May I ask if the Contractor’s understanding is correct. Lastly,
the Contractor is kindly requesting the Engineer to provide coordinates for the
six (6) corresponding bored piles to be applied in the general arrangement
layout.
1. In reference to RFI-NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000340_REV.A, the
contractor will use groove-type construction joint for the top and bottom slab. In
addition to this, the contractor will follow the IFC MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0302
location of the construction joint for the bottom slab. For the top slab, the
356 Structural Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000340 Construction Joint in Permanent Drainage contractor proposes to move the construction joint at the corner of the top slab MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0302
soffit as shown in the figure below. The contractor would like to ask for approval
to this proposal.
2. In reference to the IFC-MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0302, the contractor would like
to replace 150mm thick compacted sand with 200mm subbase embankment for
better material below water level.
38 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
In reference to the Engineer’s responses on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-

000008 (Bearing Detail), NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000152 (Gap Between
the Deck and Pier Head) and NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000205 (Pier IFC Drawing:
Heights) the Contractor would like to have a fixed values for heights of lower a. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0801
357 Structural CIS40 and CIS50 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000341 Bearing Details of CIS40 and CIS50 Bridges grout pad and bearing plinth (refer to yellow cells on Figure 2) depending on the b. MCRP-DWG-CIS40-ST-0080
type of elastomeric bearing pad. On the other hand, upper grout pad will be c. MCRP-DWG-CIS50-ST-0080
variable (refer to letters A to D on Figure 1 and Figure 2) depending on the
longitudinal slope. These proposals are for CIS40 and CIS50 bridges.
The Contractor would like to clarify of the following in drainage details IFC
Rev.12 provided by the Engineer:
Clarification on Drainage Detail in IFC Rev.12 1. The Contractor notice that as per figure 1 the drainage still on top of the pile MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2021, MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4021,
358 Structural BC01&BC03 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000342 (BC01&BC03) cap while in figure 2 drainage and pile cap has a gap in between depending on MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1355
the soil cover of the pile cap. Please confirm if our understanding is correct and
provide revised IFC drawing.
The Contractor would like to clarify of the following in drainage details IFC
Rev.12 provided by the Engineer:
1. As per IFC “MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0402 rev. 31” the dimension of the drainage
359 Structural Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000343 Clarification on Drainage Detail in IFC Rev.12 (VIA00) provided in 650x500mm (refer to figure 1) while on IFC “MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST- MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0402,0421,0460,0471,0473,0491, 1355,1356
1355 rev. 30” the dimension is 800x650mm & 800x600mm depending on the soil
cover of pile cap (refer to figure 2). The Contractor would like to cask the
Engineer which dimension will govern and provide revised IFC drawing.
As per Engineer’s response on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000289, seismic

restrainer pin diameter for BR105 Main Piers should be 865mm (refer to Figure
1). On the other hand, as shown on MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0152 Rev.32 (refer to
Figure 2), the eyebolt to be used for the mentioned seismic restrainer pin is Type
M64 which has a working load of 88.3kN. Upon checking, the calculated seismic
360 Structural Bridge 105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000344 Eyebolt for BR105 Main Piers Seismic Restrainer restrainer pin weight is 173kN that exceeds the working load of the Type M64 MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0152 Rev.32
eyebolt.
In accordance with JIS-B-1168-1994, the Contractor is asking for confirmation if
the eyebolt could be changed to M100 with a safe working load of 196kN. Please
confirm.
In order for the Contractor to carry out the detailed design of the cable system
especially the length of the guide pipe, it is kindly requested to provide the
361 Structural Bridge 105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000345 Length Information to Design the Guide Pipe information or the Employer’s intention regarding the “horizontal length (H1)” MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0420
and “the height from the deck to the tip of the guide pipe (V1)”.
Reference is made to the specification clause TS231.3.3 (2) [Stay Cable

Sheathing] and the responses to ADJV’s RFI with ref. NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-
RFI-ST-000297. It is surely agreeable that “the color of HDPE pipe from light color
362 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000346 HDPE Pipe Color Recommendation in white series reduce the absorption of sunlight” and the long-term UV-stability No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
also should be assured. With consider above, ADJV would like to suggest RAL
9003.
In the latest revision, rev. 31, the recess detail is not included, however it was
shown in the previous revision, rev. 30. Kindly confirm that the recess of 6mm on MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-781 REV 30
363 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000347 Clarification on Bearing Plinth Recess Requirement top of the pier head is not required but chipping will be done on top of the pier MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-781 REV 31
head to ensure the concrete bond.
After hacking of the excess concrete in Pier no. 782, an unintended bent of
364 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000348 Bored Pile Main Rebar Orientation above Cut-off Level bored
The Contractor
pile mainwould
rebarslike to suggest
above the “Guidelines
cut-off level for theinextent
can be observed of 02.
Pile No. the No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
damage permissible to the shear keys on PSM” to the Engineer based on the
following reasons.
1. Generally, the margin of safety allows a small percentage of the keys to be
broken referring the “Construction Practice Handbook for concrete segmental
and cable-supported bridges 3rd edition, cl.17.11-4” which was issued by
Guidelines for the Extent of the Damage Permissible to “American Segmental Bridge Institute” in June 2019. Note that the shear keys
365 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000349 the Shear Keys on PSM are just for the construction stage, and the minimum proposed below is very MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0802, 0804
conservative.
2. Furthermore, it is not recommended that shear keys are repaired prior to
erection, since any repair of the match-casted surface can lead to fitting
problems and usually to severe spalling upon erection work.
3. Therefore, the Contractor suggest establishing the guidelines for acceptable
key breakage and make the repair after erection.
39 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
A. As per NSCR-GCR-N02-ZWD-LTR-EM-000002-N-02; OCS MAST POSITIONS

(Revised) Rev. 11, the Contractor would like to ask for clarifications for the
following items below.
1. OCS location for the CIS40-5 (P-695/1) is not shown on the table (refer to
366 Structural CIS40 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000350 OCS Pole Locations for CIS Figure 1) but there is a mast reflected on the general arrangement drawing (refer No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
to Figure 2). Please clarify if OCS is needed, if yes, please give the specific
location.
2. For OCS location of CIS40-6 (P-695a/1), the said location on the table (refer to
Figure 1) is not matching with the approximate location on the general
arrangement drawing (refer to green line on Figure 2). Please confirm the
367 Structural Viaduct Pile Cap NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000351 Clarifications for Hooks on 2nd Layer of Bottom Main location.
Clarifications for Hooks on 2nd Layer of Bottom Main Bar of Type A and Type A1 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0341_Rev.32
Bar of Type A and Type A1 Pile Cap Pile Cap
Clarification on Location of Bearings and Geometry of
368 Structural Viaduct Pier Heads NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000352 Pier Head at P698 Clarification on Location of Bearings and Geometry of Pier Head at P698 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0423 (Rev.32)
Signaling House (ISER2) and Substation (SS14)

369 Structural ancillary Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000353 Buildings’ Bored Pile Cut-off Level Signaling House (ISER2) and Substation (SS14) Buildings’ Bored Pile Cut-off Level No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
370 Structural Viaduct Pier Heads NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000354 GZ Modified Bar Shape Detail GZ Modified Bar Shape Detail - Hoop Proposal MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1101, 0601
The contractor would like to modify the said shape of Bar Mark A50 which will
371 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000355 Modification of the Shape of Bar Mark A50 help to install bars easily MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001
Clarification and Proposals for the Deck Widening of

372 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000356 Precast Segments Clarification and Proposals for the Deck Widening of Precast Segments MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1500 Rev. 31 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1501 Rev. 31
373 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000357 Modification of Bar Mark A47 & A41 Modification of Bar Mark A47 & A41 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001
Modification on the Orientation of Bar Mark A11 in A1 The Contractor would like to propose orientation of bar mark A11 facing bottom
374 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000358 Segment slab MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002
Detail of Preformed Pre-Cast Compressible Material at

375 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000359 Station Plaza 1 San Fernando Station Detail of Preformed Pre- Cast Compressible Material at Station Plaza 1 San FernanMCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4201 to 4202, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4211 to 4215
Guide Specification for Grouted Post-Tensioning PTI/ASBI and Post-Tensioning

376 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000360 Grouting Cap Tendon Installation and Grouting Manual No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Proposed Reinforcement Details for Bar Mark A27 in

377 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000361 Segment Type A1 Proposed Reinforcement Details for Bar Mark A27 in Segment Type A1 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002
Anchors Embedded in Pier P-526 and P-712 Pile Cap The Contractor would like to ask non-objection for embedments on pile cap for
378 Structural P-526 and P-712 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000362 for Launching Gantry Shoring the shoring support system in P526 and P572 No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Modification Bar Mark T19 in OCS Pole on Segment

379 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000363 Type A1 Modification Bar Mark T19 in OCS Pole on Segment Type A1 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1302
MCRP-DWG-SS14-ST-4301 Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-SS15-ST-4301 Rev.31, MCRP-

DWG-SS16-ST 4301 Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-SS17-ST-4301 Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-BP2-
380 Structural Ancillary Building Bored Pile NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000364 Detail of Bored Pile Heads at Ancillary Buildings Detail of Bored Pile Heads at Ancillary Buildings ST-4301 Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-ISER2-ST-4301 Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-ISER3-ST-4301
Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4531 Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4631 Rev.31
Bar Mark A38 Conflicts with OCS Pole in Segment Type

381 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000365 A1 Bar Mark A38 Conflicts with OCS Pole in Segment Type A1 No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Clarification on the RFI-ST-000237 Response regarding The contractor would like to confirm if Bar Marks T20 and T21 are additional
382 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000366 OCS Pole Reinforcement Details on Segment Type A1 bars or belong to deck reinforcements. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1302
Request for Confirmation Dimension Shear Key in The Contractor will add shear key as per the Engineer’s response to ensure
383 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000367 Segment Type T2 alignment of the slab. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0802
The contractor would like to ask for utilization of 25mmx25mm angle bar for
384 Structural Viaduct Pier Head NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000368 Use of 25mmx25mm Angle Bar Chamfer on Pier Heads chamfer on pier heads. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0501
385 Structural Viaduct Pier Head NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000369 P5d Pier Head Reinforcements The Contractor wants to clarify the reinforcement detail of P24 and P50 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0447, 0645 Rev. 1
Variation Proposal for Reinforcing Mesh on Bearing
386 Structural Viaduct Pier Head NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000370 Plinths Variation Proposal for Reinforcing Mesh on Bearing Plinths MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0672
387 Structural Viaduct Pier Head NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000371 Spacing of Top Bars of Pier Head Type P2 The Contractor to clarify the spacing of the top bars of pier head type P2 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0821, 0951, 0952, 0991
388 Structural Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000372 Detailed Drainage Design and Calculation Detailed Drainage Design and Calculation No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Bar Details in between Bar Mark B1 for Pile Cap Type
389 Structural Viaduct Pile Cap NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000373 P5D Bar Details in between Bar Mark B1 for Pile Cap Type P5D MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0345_Rev.31
Request for the Design Reports of San Fernando Request for the Design Reports of San Fernando Station, Sig/Com/Electric HSE
390 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000374 Station, Sig/Com/Electric HSE and Substructure Design and Substructure Design of Pier Types P3, P6, and P5D MCRP-CAL-VIA-ST-0012_R3
of Pier Types P3, P6, and P5D
40 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
MCRP-DWG-SS14-ST-4201 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SS15-ST-4201 Rev.30, MCRP-

DWG-SS16-ST 4201 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SS17-ST-4201 Rev.30; MCRP-DWG-PSS-
Clarification of Ground Floor Structural and Finish Clarification of Ground Floor Structural and Finish Floor Levels (SFL and FFL) at AR-3102, MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3501; MCRP DWG-SS14-ST-4301 Rev.31, MCRP-
391 Structural Ancillary Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000375 Floor Levels (SFL and FFL) at Substations SS14 to SS17 Substations SS14 to SS17 DWG-SS15-ST-4301 Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-SS16-ST-4301 Rev.31, MCRP DWG-SS17-
ST-4301 Rev.31
Clarification on Bearing Plinth Detail and
392 Structural Viaduct Pier Head NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000376 Reinforcements Clarification on Bearing Plinth Detail and Reinforcements MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0602, -0781
393 Structural Viaduct Pier Column NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000377 Arrangement of Inner Tie Bars in Column Arrangement of Inner Tie Bars in Column MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0603_Rev.30
Viaduct Pile Cap, Pier Head and
394 Structural Pier Column NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000378 Patching of Tie Rod Hole Patching of Tie Rod Hole No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
395 Structural Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000379 Drainage Locations for CIS50 and CIS40 Drainage Locations for CIS50 and CIS40 MCRP-DWG-CIS50-ST-0012, MCRP-DWG-CIS40-ST-0012
Request for Change BM A03 and BM T03 in Segments
396 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000380 A2/A3/T2 & T3 Request for Change BM A03 and BM T03 in Segments A2/A3/T2 & T3 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1022, 1091
Modification on the Shape of Bar Mark A48 in Due to the different dimensions of seismic restrainers, the Contractor would like
397 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000381 Segment Type A1 to modify the shape of Bar Mark A48 from HT to 2 nos of LH. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002
398 Structural Viaduct Pier Heads NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000382 GZ Proposed Bar Shape Detail with Coupler GZ Proposed Bar Shape Detail with Coupler Connection MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1101, 0601
Connection
GZ Proposed Bar Shape Detail with Coupler
399 Structural Viaduct Pier Heads NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000382 Connection GZ Proposed Bar Shape Detail with Coupler Connection MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1101, 0601
Clarification of Ground Floor Structural and Finish Clarification of Ground Floor Structural and Finish Floor Levels (SFL and FFL) at MCRP-RFI-BP2-ST-4201 Rev.01, MCRP-RFI-BP2-ST-4202 Rev.01, MCRP-DWG-BP-
400 Structural Ancillary Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000383 Floor Levels (SFL and FFL) at Battery Post BP2-1 to BP2- Battery Post BP2-1 to BP2-4 AR 3102, 3103, 3105, 3106, 3501, MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4301
4
Distance Between Piles of P5D on Piers P-596, P-597
401 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000384 and P-598 Distance Between Piles of P5D on Piers P-596, P-597 and P-598 MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0030
MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0107_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0301_Rev.30 MCRP-

402 Structural Bored Pile P-629 and P-630 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000385 Clarification of Bored Pile Details for P-629 and P-630 Clarification of Bored Pile Details for P-629 and P-630 DWG-VIA02-ST-0034_Rev.30
The Contractor would like to request additional reinforcements due to the
403 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000386 Additional Reinforcements in the Web in Segment change in the geometry in the portion of stripping slope to obtain adequate MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0921, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0941
Type A1, A2, & A3 concrete cover and avoid possible spalls on the time of demolding.
Request for Change Geometry in Cast-in-situ Recess Request for change geometry in cast in situ recess for tendon anchorage in
404 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000387 for Tendon Anchorage segments A1, A2 & A3 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0902,0922,0942
Contractor wants to confirm non-objection on the proposed increase in the

405 Structural Viaduct Pier Head NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000388 Bearing Plinth Adjusted Dimension on P526 dimension of the bearing plinth MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0401- Rev 31 and 0803-Rev 31
Request Details on Block Out Reinforcement (Opening

406 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000389 for Cables) Request Details on Block Out Reinforcement (Opening for Cables) MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ERO 0010
Pile Rebar Extension to Prepare Pile Cap Level Change

407 Structural Viaduct Pile Cap NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000390 in Swampy Area Pile Rebar Extension to Prepare Pile Cap Level Change in Swampy Area No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0405 Rev.30 MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0406 Rev.30 MCRP-

408 Structural BR105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000391 BR105 Bottom Tendon Layout BR105 Bottom Tendon Layout DWG-BR105-ST-0435 Rev.30
409 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000392 Modification of Bar Marks A21 and A22 Modification of Bar Marks A21 and A22 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1021
The contractor would like to propose using Al-Mg Thermal Spraying Method
410 Structural Main Pier BR104 and BR105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000393 Seismic Restrainer Coating Protection instead of hot-dip galvanized for the corrosion protection of seismic restrainer MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4033, MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0152
pins with a weight of more than 5 tons.
Proposed Removal of Bar Mark B7 in Pile Cap Located
411 Structural Viaduct Pile Cap NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000394 in Pier Column Region Proposed Removal of Bar Mark B7 in Pile Cap Located in Pier Column Region MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0343_Rev.33, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0345_Rev.31
Exposed Bored Piles of Substation 17 after Pile Cap

412 Structural Ancillary Building Bored Pile NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000395 Excavation at P-804 Exposed Bored Piles of Substation 17 after Pile Cap Excavation at P-804 No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Clarification in 6.3m and 5.1 m Wide Tendon Layout The Contractor would like the Engineer to clarify the correct location of the
413 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000396 (PSM) tendon's curve MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1137 Rev. 31
MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0322, 0323, 0324 and 1653

Referring to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000397 Rev. A, the Engineer has MCRP-DWG-BC-01-ST-2012 and 4012,
Welded Splice of Spiral Rebar in Bored Pile approved the welded splice shown in Figure 1 and is applicable to bored piles for MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0012, MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-3401
414 Structural Viaduct Bored Piles NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000397 Reinforcement viaduct including balanced cantilever bridges and extra dosed bridge (BR105), MCRP-DWG-SS14-ST-4301, MCRP-DWG-SS15-ST-4301,
battery posts, substations and signaling houses. MCRP-DWG-SS16-ST-4301, MCRP-DWG-SS17-ST-4301,
MCRP-DWG-ISER2-ST-4301, MCRP-DWG-ISER3-ST-4301
MCRP-DWG-CIS50-ST-0011 Rev 30, -0012 Rev 30; MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0821

415 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000398 Proposed adjustment of CIS50-4 and CIS50-3 Proposed adjustment of CIS50-4 and CIS50-3 Rev 31, -0851 Rev 30 MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0030 Rev 30, -0032 Rev 30
Exposed Bored Piles of Substation 17 after Pile Cap
416 Structural Ancillary Building Bored Pile NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000399 Excavation at P-805 Exposed Bored Piles of Substation 17 after Pile Cap Excavation at P-805 No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
41 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
Clarification of Signaling House (ISER 2) Bored Pile

417 Structural Ancillary Building Bored Pile NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000400 Coordinates Clarification of Signaling House (ISER 2) Bored Pile Coordinates No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Signaling House (ISER2) and Substation (SS14) Signaling House (ISER2) and Substation (SS14) Buildings’ Bored Pile Founding
418 Structural Ancillary Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000401 Buildings’ Bored Pile Founding Level, Service Load Level, Service Load Design Capacity and GRD Levels MCRP-DWG-SS14-ST-4301_Rev.30 MCRP-DWG-ISER2-ST-4301_Rev.30
Design Capacity and GRD Levels
Clarification of Distance Between Piles of P5D Portal MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0303_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0027_Rev.30,
419 Structural Viaduct Bored Piles NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000402 Piers P-570, P-571, P-573 and P-609 Distance Between Piles of P5D Portal Piers P-570, P-571, P-573 and P-609 MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0028_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0032_Rev.30
According to NSCR-GCR-N02-ZWD-LTR-EM-000002-N-02; OCS MAST POSITIONS
420 Structural OCS Pole NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000403 OCS Location at Span S610 (Revised) Rev. 15, there is an OCS mast located at 58+919.075, see location No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
boxed in below figure.
MCRP-DWG-CIS50-ST-0031, MCRP-DWG-CIS50-ST-0032,
421 Structural Viaduct CIS NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000404 Clarifications on Rebar Details for CIS50 and CIS40 Clarifications on rebar details for CIS50 and CIS40 MCRP-DWG-CIS40-ST-0031, MCRP-DWG-CIS40-ST-0032
422 Structural Viaduct CIS NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000405 Modification on Rebar Details for CIS50 and CIS40 Modification on rebar details for CIS50 and CIS40 MCRP-DWG-CIS50-ST-0031, -0032
According to the "NSCR-GCR-N02-ZWD-LTR-EM-000002 OCS MAST POSITIONS
(Revised) Rev. 15", the internal diameter of pipe sleeves should be 200mm (refer
Modification of HDPE Pipe Size used in Blockout for figure 1). However, the Contractor could not find a supplier that has internal
423 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000406 Cables diameter of 200mm, so we would like to propose PVC pipe with an outside No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
diameter of 200mm and an inside diameter of 184mm. The Contractor would
like to know if the proposal is acceptable in this case.
In accordance with the RFI-ST-000345 response, the Contractor would like to use
a height of 500 mm from the deck to the tip of the guideline pipe (V1) as
424 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000407 Proposed Vertical Height of the Guide Pipe recommended by the supplier. The Contractor would like to ask the Engineer if MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0420
the proposed vertical length is acceptable.
Clarification on Discrepancies of Rebars in Segment Contractor would like to clarify the quantities of Bar Marks A30, A08, A05, A07,
425 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000408 Type A2 and A3 A11 and A26, and Shape of Bar Mark A20. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1021, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1022
Confirmation of Bar Marks and Missing Rebars in

426 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000409 Segment Type A2 and A3 Correct Bar Marks and Missing Rebars MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1021, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1022
Contractor wants to propose modifications of Rebars similar to the modifications

427 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000410 Modification of Rebars in Segment Type A2 and A3 accepted in Segment Type A1 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1021, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1022
Clarification of Verified Pile Length Information Clarification of Verified Pile Length Information Provided in NSCR-GCR-N02- MCRP-CAL-VIA-ST-0012 Rev 3, MCRP-CAL-VIA-ST-0189-Rev1,
428 Structural Viaduct Bored Piles NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000411 Provided in NSCR-GCR-N02-CSFSTN-LTR-CN-000046 CSFSTN-LTR-CN-000046 MCRP-DWG-VIA02-DR-0005
Changes in the Dimensions of the Seismic Restrainer MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1022,
429 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000412 Holes in the Top and Bottom Slabs Dimensions of the Seismic Restrainer Holes in the Top and Bottom Slabs MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1201,
430 Structural Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000413 Clarification of Steel Reinforcement at All Buildings Clarification of Steel Reinforcement at All Buildings MCRP-DWG-STA-ST-4002 Rev.30
Contractor would like to ask the Engineer if this actual arrangement will be
431 Structural Viaduct Pier Column NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000414 Arrangement of Bar Marks P9 and P10 in Pier Column acceptable MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0604_30
MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0151 Rev.32, MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0152 Rev.32,

432 Structural P467 to P470 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000415 BR105 Main Pier Seismic Restrainer Pin Location BR105 Main Pier Seismic Restrainer Pin Location MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0412 Rev.32
Substation (SS15 & SS16), Battery Post (BP2-1, BP2-2,
BP2-3 & BP2-4) Buildings and Emergency Staircase (ES- Substation (SS15 & SS16), Battery Post (BP2-1, BP2-2, BP2-3 & BP2-4) Buildings
3, ES-4, ES-5 & ES-6) Bored Pile Cut-off Level and and Emergency Staircase (ES-3, ES-4, ES-5 & ES-6) Bored Pile Cut-off Level and MCRP-DWG-SS15-ST-4301, MCRP-DWG-SS16-ST-4301 MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4301
433 Structural Ancillary Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000416 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1653
Founding Level, Service Load Design Capacity and GRD Founding Level, Service Load Design Capacity and GRD Levels
Levels
Details for Realigned Canal between P-541 to P-558 The Contactor requires additional information to produce realigned canal MCRP-DWG-VIA02-DR-0072 to 0074, MCRP-DWG-VIA02-DR-0005,
434 Structural Drainage System NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000417 (Sta. 56+215 to Sta. 56+878) drawings based on MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0414 and MCRP-DWG-VIA02-DR-0072 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0414, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0407
to 0074.
Through NSCR-GCR-N02-CSFSTN-LTR-CN-000046-N-02, Final GL (m) at each pier

for viaduct has been given to the Contractor as shown in the below. In the case
Longitudinal and Cross-sectional Earthwork Drawings of some piers, the Final GL is greater than the Actual GL, implying that the
435 Structural P561 to P563 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000418 for Viaduct Contractor must construct an embankment to meet the Final GL (Figure 1 and MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0080 to 0091
Figure 2). When the Contractor checked IFC Drawings, there’s no drawings with
embankment or fill.
The RFI is raised to request the Engineer to provide with alignment drawing for
436 Structural Drainage System NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000419 Revised Alignment Drawing for Drainage drainage, in which clashes between drainage and pile cap are resolved. MCRP-DWG-VIA02-DR-0059 to 0104
Request Updated MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0101 to The Contractor would like to request the Engineer to provide an updated MCRP-
437 Structural Viaduct Pier NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000420 MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0112 Pier Schedule DWG-VIA02-ST-0101 to MCRP-DWGVIA02-ST-0112 pier schedule that includes MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0101 to MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0112
information not described in NSCR-GCR-N02-CSFSTN-LTR-CN-000046.
42 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
Since the storage area of precast segment in precast yard is limited, the
Contractor would like to propose transporting the casted segment with a
concrete strength of 26 MPa to the designated pier area for erection.
438 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000421 Storage and Transport for Casted Precast Segment The said segment will only be stored and will not be erected until it reaches a MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0901
compressive strength of 50 MPa. Please confirm whether the proposal is
acceptable or not.
The Contractor would like to use approved curing compound for horizontal side
of structures (pile cap, column and pier head) and use water curing for the
439 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000422 Use of Curing Compound vertical side after removal of steel forms until seven days after concrete pouring. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Please confirm if the proposal is acceptable.
Contractor would like to propose construction method and/or construction

Request for Pile Bearing Capacity and Pile Length sequence of foundations near ancillary buildings and emergency staircases
Calculation Report for Ancillary Buildings and including bored pile, pile cap excavation and pile caps with consideration of
440 Structural Ancillary Building Bored Pile NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000423 these condition. To develop the construction method and/or construction NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000399
Emergency Staircases
sequence, the Contractor needs to know how the Designer calculated pile
bearing capacity and pile length for Ancillary Buildings and Emergency Staircases.
The Contractor updated the proposal of Design Basis and Pile Layout with
Replacement Piles taking into consideration the RFI Response in NSCR-ADJV-
N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000424 Rev. A. For clarity, the Contractor will not utilize the
Proposed Design Basis and Pile Layout with bored piles that yielded failed results after conducting further investigation like
441 Structural P-510 to P-521 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000424 Supplementary Piles from P-510 to P-521 tomography and PDA tests. These failed piles shall be replaced accordingly. In No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
this regard, the Contractor would like to ask the Engineer to review the amended
Design Basis and Pile Layout with Replacement Piles. (Please refer to the
attached document.)
The Contractor is now working on the remediation for the pile cap and defected
piles with supplementary pile(s) within piers P-510 to P-521. In line with the
Remediation Analysis Model using Software Equivalent preparation of the design calculation and analysis of the remediation design,
442 Structural P-510 to P-521 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000425 to Midas Civil model analysis is needed. The Contractor would like to prepare remediation No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
model analysis using software equivalent to Midas Civil. Please let us know if the
proposal is acceptable.
In the block out reinforcement detail, the Contractor’s understanding is the

reinforcing bars equal to or greater than the reinforcing bars to be cut shall be
Clarifications on Reinforcements Affected by the added accordingly. However, T12(20mmØ) and T10(16mmØ) was cut in upper
443 Structural Viaduct Segment NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000426 Blockouts (Opening for Cables) No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
layer but replaced only by T12-1 with diameter of 20mm. Thus, we want to ask
the Engineer if replacement for cutted T10(16mmØ) is necessary or not.
In line with the above findings, the Contractor would like to ask the Engineer to
Clarification of Bearing Capacity and Length of Piles in review the Contractor’s bearing capacity calculations and so, to prevent any
444 Structural Bored Pile NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000427 Swampy Area possible unfavorable scenario regarding pile bearing capacity (pile length). (For No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
detailed calculation done by the Contractor, please refer to the attachment).
Concrete Compressive Strength for Drainage In this case, may we ask your good office for clarification on which Concrete
445 Structural Drainage System NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000428 Structures (Viaduct and Station) Compressive Strength will govern. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
In order to resolve this issue, the Contractor must glue and stress each segment
446 Structural Viaduct Segment NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000429 Temporary Stressing Method within 42minutes, which is thought to be impossible with considering the site No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
condition and will be one of the big risks. Please advise us.
Further Clarifications on Reinforcements Affected by

447 Structural Viaduct Segment NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000430 the Blockouts (Opening for Cables) More Information for Details of Blockouts (Opening for Cables) No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Change of Diameter Size of Shear Connectors in Track As per IFC Drawings, the diameter size of the shear connector is 16mm. Refer to
448 Structural Viaduct Segment NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000431 Slab on All Segment Types figures below. The contractor would like to use for the said connector, either No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
diameter 16mm per IFC or 20mm depending on actual site condition.
MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4201 Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4202 Rev.A, MCRP-

DWGISER2-ST-4201 Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-ISER3-ST-4201 Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-SS14-
449 Structural Ancillary Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000432 Clarification of Pile Cap Elevation at Ancillary Buildings We would like to clarify the final depth of PILE CAP on all ancillary buildings. ST-4201 Rev.B, MCRPDWG-SS15-ST-4201 Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-SS16-ST-4201
Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-SS17-ST-4201 Rev.B
Location of Plastic Hinge and Confinement Region for The spacing of 100mm is applicable to the whole height of confinement region
450 Structural Pier Type P5D NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000433 Clarification of Shear Bars Spacing of Pier Type P5D (HC) plus the depth of 200mm below from the top of pile cap, as shown in the MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0645_Rev.31
drawing numbers mentioned in this RFI.
43 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
Details to prevent water ponding in girders. In the case of bridge approaches and
ramps where the girders are sloping/ inclined. It is anticipated that water will
pond in the low area on top of the girder. This is due to the 150 mm x 160 mm
451 Structural Viaduct Segment NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000434 Clarification on Water Ponding on Inclined Deck Slab stepup concrete block that run across the end of the girder. This water when it MCRP-DWG-VIA0-ST-0063
dries will accumulate mud and other debris that may cause hazard during
construction and operation period.
In IFC drawing, protective concrete layer is required to apply at top slab of the
bridge (refer to figure 1). Considering situation where block-out is present,
452 Structural Viaduct Segment NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000435 HDPE Pipe Length used in Blockout for Cables length of pipe will increase. Contractor’s understanding is the pipe should extend MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0064
in full depth diagonally and vertically as shown in figure 2 and 3 respectively.
Please confirm if the Contractor’s understanding is correct or not.
ADJV’s Proposal Regarding Pile Cap Levels at P-457, P-

453 Structural P457,P458, P469, P460 and P467 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000436 458, P-469, P-460 and P-467 ADJV’s proposal regarding pile cap levels at P-457, P-458, P-469, P-460 and P-467 MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0101_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0102_Rev.30
Clarifications on Geometry of Pier Head P599SB Type MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0491 REV 31, MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0022 REV 30;
454 Structural P599SB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000437 P6 Clarifications on Geometry of pier head P599SB type P6 MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0106 REV 30
455 Structural P599SB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000438 Plinth for Pot Bearings of BR110 (P597 and P599SB) Plinth for Pot bearings of BR110 MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0043 Rev 30
During the stressing works, to achieve the jacking force shown in the Employer’s
drawing with ref. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1133 and 1138, the applied force by the
stressing jack can be slightly greater than the required jacking force (75% of
Nominal Ultimate Tensile Strength). However, the applied force must not be
456 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000439 Maximum Applicable Stressing Force higher than the yielding stress shown in the mill certificate of the strands and MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1133 and 1138
controlled. Please let us know whether it is acceptable by the Engineer, if the
maximum applied stressing force is controlled less than 85% of Nominal Ultimate
Tensile Strength or Yielding stress of the strand, which is smaller.
To increase the bonding stress between the grout pad and the deck soffit, it is
understood that the contact surface shall be roughened as shown in following
457 Structural Bearing Pad NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000440 Roughened Surface for Upper Grout Pad figure 1. To do this, it is kindly requested to accept the Contractor’s proposal that No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
the check plate will be installed in the mould, consequently the roughened
surface will be formed after casting.
MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0491 REV 31, -0651 REV 30 and -0652 REV 30;
458 Structural Viaduct Pier Heads NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000441 Clarifications on Reinforcements of Pier Head Type P6 Clarifications on Reinforcements of Pier head Type P6 MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0022 REV 30; MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0106 REV 30;
459 Structural P468 & P469 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000442 Reinforcement Details for P-468 and P-469 Column Reinforcement Details for P-468 and P-469 Column MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4048, 4049
As commented on NSCR-GCR-N02-CSFSTN-DRC-ST-00038 of Structural Shop

Clarification of Staircase Steps at Battery Post BP2-1 to Drawings Revision A of Battery Post BP2-1, as quoted “ADJV to clarify and/or
460 Structural Battery Post BP2-1 to BP2-4 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000443 BP2-4 provide references (RFI, IFC, etc.) for the change in design steps for Staircase. In No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
IFC structural and architectural drawings, 4 steps only” (See Figure 1).
Detail of Beam Rigid Joint Connections on Structural Detail of Beam Rigid Joint Connections on Structural Steel at San Fernando
461 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000444 Steel at San Fernando Station Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4411
Detail of Bolted Moment on Structural Steel at San

462 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000445 Fernando Station Detail of Bolted Moment on Structural Steel at San Fernando MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4402
Detail of Girder connection to Girder Joint Location on Detail of Girder connection to Girder Joint Location on Structural Steel at San
463 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000446 Structural Steel at San Fernando Station Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131, 4141, 4151
Detail of Splice Connection for BH1200x500x25x40 on Detail of Splice Connection for BH1200x500x25x40 on Structural Steel at San
464 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000447 Structural Steel at San Fernando Station Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4151, 4402
Detail of Cross Brace RSG21 on Structural Steel at San 1. Please provide the thickness of stiffener plate.
465 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000448 Fernando Station 2. The Diaphragm and the connector plate of cross brace RSG21 will collide. To MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4151
remove the diaphragm, Please confirm or provide further details
Clarifications on Quantities of Bar Marks A36, A37 and
466 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000449 A31 on Segment Type A1 Quantities of Bar Marks A36, A37 and A31 on Segment Type A1 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002
The Engineer specified the location of the cable openings Type A to I in segments
(refer to figure 1). As per the notes the pipe sleeve group location can be
Tolerance of Location of HDPE Pipe used in Blockout adjusted by up to 100mm while keeping the intervals unchanged. However,
467 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000450 for Cables there is a chance that individually the pipes will move slightly during casting and No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
the intervals between pipes will change. Due to this, the contractor would like to
ask the Engineer if a tolerance (individual pipe) of ± 25mm is acceptable.
44 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
Clarification of Expansion Joint Clearance at Concourse Clarification of Expansion Joint Clearance at Concourse on Structural Steel at San MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4422 Rev.30,
468 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000451 on Structural Steel at San Fernando Station Fernando Station MCRP-DWGSFD-ST-4421 Rev.30
Detail of Unmarked Material at Concourse on As shown on MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4422, Expansion Joint Details, it shows a
469 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000452 Structural Steel at San Fernando Station material on top of CSG25 which is unmarked/no indicated material profile (See MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4422
Figure 1)
Confirmation of SB60M Orientation on Concourse With reference to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000453 Rev.A, please provide
470 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000453 Structural Steel at San Fernando Station thickness of the following: MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131
1. ACP9, 2. ACP27, 3. ACP29
Detail of Connection of Beam to Tapered Girder on Detail of Connection of Beam to Tapered Girder on Platform Structural Steel at MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4141 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4211 to 4215 Rev.30,
471 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000454 Platform Structural Steel at San Fernando Station San Fernando Station MCRPDWG-SFD-ST-4411 Rev.30
Detail of SC11 Column on Concourse Structural Steel at
472 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000455 San Fernando Station Detail of SC11 Column on Concourse Structural Steel at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131
Modification of Bar Mark A26 in Segment Type A2 and

473 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000456 A3 Shape of Bar Mark A26 in Segment Type A2 and A3 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1021, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1022
Clarification of Floor Finish Slope on Platform at San

474 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000457 Fernando Station Clarification of Floor Finish Slope on Platform at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501 Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3421 Rev.30
It is understood that the grout can be injected from any point if the profile
475 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000458 Grouting Inlet Location change in the tendon is not significant, which should be less than 0.5m (It is not No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
necessary to install injection tube if the height variation is less than 0.5m).
The losses of prestress force had been estimated considering the loss due to
Approximate Elongation of Tendons in Precast friction (due to curvature and wobble of tendon) in post-tensioned tendon only.
476 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000459 Segment The losses due to elastic deformation of concrete is negligible (less than 0.5mm MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1121, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1133
in each tendon).
Detail of Girder Splice Connections on Concourse
477 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000460 Structural Steel at San Fernando Station Detail of Girder Splice Connections on Structural Steel at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4402 Rev.30
Please confirm if the Platform Edge Detail shown in MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4411

Detail of Platform Edge on Platform Structural Steel at Rev. 30 is applicable to Gridline X01 as the framing plan shows otherwise. Please
478 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000461 San Fernando Station provide the connection of tapered girder to beam at Gridlines X01 & X02. (See MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4402 Rev.30
below 3D Snapshot)
Detail of SB60 and SB60M on Platform Structural Steel MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4141 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4411 Rev.30,
479 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000462 at San Fernando Station Detail of SB60 and SB60M on Platform Structural Steel at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWGSFD-ST-4216 Rev.3
Detail of SB100A Rigid Joint Connection on Platform Please provide connection detail of SB100A (Rigid Joint Connection) when the
480 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000463 Structural Steel at San Fernando Station girder connected to is tapered. (See below 3D Snapshot) MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4141 Rev. 30
Modification on Upper Grout Pad of Bearings for CIS Confirmation for Modification on Upper Grout Pad of Bearings for CIS and BC MCRP-DWG-CIS40-ST-0080, MCRP-DWG-CIS50-ST-0080,
481 Structural Viaduct Pier Heads NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000464 and BC Bridges Bridges MCRP-DWG-CIS70-ST-0080 MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2050,
MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4055,
Detail of Beam SB50 on Platform Structural Steel at
482 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000465 San Fernando Station Detail of Beam SB50 on Platform Structural Steel at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4141 Rev.30
Detail of Connection for Beams SB60 and SB40 on Detail of Connection for Beams SB60 and SB40 on Platform Structural Steel at MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4141 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4411 Rev.30,
483 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000466 Platform Structural Steel at San Fernando San Fernando MCRP-DWGSFD-ST-4422 Rev.30
Detail Elevation of Ancillary Buildings against Viaduct We have observed clashes between the Battery Post BP2-1 to BP2-4 and ISER3 to
484 Structural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000467 Structures the Viaduct Structure/s. The Parapet Wall/Roof Slab of the building structures No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
will collide on the bottom part of the Precast Segments.
As per the Engineer’s response in NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000396, the

Contractor applied the correct location of the tangency point for T6. The
Tendon Profile for 6.3m and 5.1m Precast Segmental Contractor would like to ask the Engineer to verify if the location of each tendon
485 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000468 Bridge MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1137 Rev.31
is acceptable. This is only for 40m span, while for 30m span 4 segments in the
middle will be omitted.
RFI is raised by the Contractor to the engineer to confirm non-objection on the

Proposed Tendon Stressing Method on CIS50 and proposed change of stressing methodology of the highlighted. The intention of
486 Structural Bridge CIS50 and CIS40 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000469 CIS40 the Contractor is to switch from stressing both ends to only one end. The MCRP-DWG-CIS50-ST-0042 REV 30; MCRP-DWG-CIS40-ST-0042 REV 30
proposal shall also be applicable to CIS 40.
Detail of Connection of SB100A to SB100A & PSG2A on Detail of Connection of SB100A to SB100A & PSG2A on Platform Structural Steel
487 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000470 Platform Structural Steel at San Fernando Station at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4141 Rev.30
Detail of Connection of SB100A to SB100A & PSG2A on In reference to the responded RFI – NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-00470 Rev.A,
488 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000470 Platform Structural Steel at San Fernando Station SB100A and PSG2A are one block at shop. TO be welded and assembled at shop. MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4141 Rev.30
However, delivery will be difficult due to its fabricated size (See Figure 1).
45 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
According to pile notes specified in MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0320, tubes for

489 Structural Sonic Pipe NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000471 Grouting of Sonic Pipe integrity test using sonic logging method shall be installed in all bored piles. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0320
Detail of Connection for CSG3 BH-1300x400x25x40 Detail of Connection for CSG3 BH-1300x400x25x40 SN490B on Concourse
490 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000472 SN490B on Concourse Structural Steel at San Fernando Structural Steel at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4402 Rev.30
In our specification, the tolerance for the seismic restrainer installation is not
491 Structural Seismic Restrainer NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000473 Tolerance for Seismic Restrainer Installation clearly mentioned. The Contractor would like to suggest the tolerance as follows No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
to get the approval from the Engineer.
In line with the response on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000449, the

Contractor would like to further clarify on the following:
Further Clarifications on Top Slab Reinforcements on (1) Area of Arrangement of Bar Mark A31
492 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000474 Segment Type A1 (2) Lengths of Bar Marks A20 and A32 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002
(3) Quantity of A36
(4) Spacing and Arrangement of Bar Marks A31 and A36
493 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000475 Proposed Drainage Slope in Superstructure Clarification of Floor Finish Slope on Platform at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501 Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3421 Rev.30
Proposed Hoop Ring on Column Inside Pile Cap of MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4013, MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4048,
494 Structural P467 to P470 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000476 BR104 Main Pier Proposed Hoop Ring on Column Inside Pile cap of BR104 Main Pier MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4049
Detail of Connection for SB100 to SB70M on Detail of Connection for SB100 to SB70M on Concourse Structural Steel at San
495 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000477 Concourse Structural Steel at San Fernando Station Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4411 Rev.30
1. The actual condition wherein the Upper Structure is wider than the Bearing
Device is acceptable. (against the IFC MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4481 to 4483, bearing
MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4421 Rev.30,
Detail of Expansion Joint Device on Platform Structural device is wider). Please confirm. MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4422 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4481 Rev.30,
496 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000478 Steel at San Fernando Station 2. Welding position is on the bottom part. (against the IFC MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-
4481 to 4483, upper part). Please confirm. MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4482 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4483 Rev.30
3. It was also noted the beam widths, ”beam width 1050, not 600” and ”beam
width 950, not 400”. The beam widths 1050 & 950 and for 600 & 400 were
referred from
According IFCIFC
to the DWG-SFD-ST and NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000466
drawing "MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0402," BIRD WIRE is
Rev.C (See
required toFigure 2) respectively.
be installed along the Please confirm
perimeter beam
of the pierwidth to befigure
head (see used.1).
Initially, it will be installed part by part and will consist of a bolt connection with
497 Structural Viaduct Pier Heads NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000479 Proposed Bird Wire Design a 40mm embedment length, galvanized plate, and wire. The Contractor would MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0402
like to propose an initial design of bird wire as shown in the attached PDF for
approval by the Engineer before proceeding with the design calculation and
design drawings.
However, the Contractor is considering the scenario that the plate of the PT bars
Column Main Bar Arrangement for P-468 and P-469 at might clash with P2 bundled bars in both sides (shaded in blue) as indicated in
498 Structural P468 - P469 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000480 PT Bar Locations Figure 3 below. Thus, this RFI is raised to ask non-objection to lower these bars MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4048, 4049
to the same the level as P2b in figure 1 at each PT bar location.
Detail of Material Specification for SPL-3 on Structural Detail of Material Specification for SPL-3 on Structural Steel at San Fernando
499 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000481 Steel at San Fernando Station Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4402 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4411 Rev.30
A. Reference to MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4411 Rev.30, Intended for the connection
detail of the steel beam A36. NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000481 Rev.B
Please confirm if SN400B material specification as stated above is to apply to the
Detail of Material Specification for SPL-3 on Structural following plates:
500 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000481 Steel at San Fernando Station 1. Gusset Plate (GPL) – SN 400B MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4402 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4411 Rev.30
2. Splice Plate (SPL) – SN400B
3. Stiffener – SN400B
B. However, please consider the response to RFI No. NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-
RFI-ST-000481 Rev.A and follow the higher grade when A36 beam is connected
to
TheSN490B girder.
Contractor would like to propose a two stage casting method for pier head
501 Structural Viaduct Pier Heads NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000482 Proposal for Two Stage Casting in Pier Head as stated below. (Please refer to Figure 1). No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
The Contractor informed the Engineer that in his checking of the project have
Request for a New Design Approach for the Seismic detected an inconsistency on the definition of the seismic restrainer pin between
502 Structural Seismic Restrainer NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000483 Restrainer the original design report and the original IFC drawings as those revised on 19th No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
May 2022 through the Letter NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-LTR-CO-00104.
Maintenance Ramp (CIS70, P698, MT02-1, MT0-Abut) MCRP-DWG-CIS70-ST-0004~0130 REV30,

503 Structural Viaduct Pier Heads NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000484 Geometry and Elevations Maintenance Ramp (CIS70, P698, MT02-1, MT0-Abut) Geometry and Elevations MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0109, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0803 REV30;
46 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
As per IFC drawing reference no. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0305, shown in Figure 1

below, the ladder rung details indicate 20mm Dia. Stainless steel and Lifting
Handle 20mm, Dia. U-Bolt. As per Figure 2, the notes said the lifting handles,
Properties of Drainage Lifting Handle, Ladder Rung, ladder rung, and bar grade shall be painted with one coat of Zinc Chromate. In MCRP-DWG-VIA00-DR-0305
504 Structural Drainage Lifting Handle NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000485 and MS Plate addition, regarding 10mm THK MS PLATE, there’s no information on yield
strength and meaning of MS, with which the Contractor understands MS as mild
steel.
It is understood that there are discrepancies among the concrete strength shown
505 Structural Bridges NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000486 Concrete Strength for the Deck in specification and BOQ. Please refer to following table showing the value of the No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
minimum concrete strength.
Connection Detail of Stair Railings on Structural Steel
506 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000487 at San Fernando Station Connection Detail of Stair Railings on Structural Steel at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3512 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3571 Rev.30
Connection Detail of Stringers on Structural Steel at

507 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000488 San Fernando Station Rev. A Connection Detail of Stringers on Structural Steel at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4442 Rev.30
Clarification on Geometry of BR104 Transition Piers

508 Structural P467 to P470 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000489 (P467 P470) Clarification on geometry of BR104 Transition Piers (P467 P470) MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4021, -4022, -4041, -4042, -4055
Detail of Stairs Fire Exit 5 and 6 on Structural Steel at MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3521 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3522 Rev.30,
509 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000490 San Fernando Station Detail of Stairs Fire Exit 5 and 6 on Structural Steel at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWGSFD-ST-4444 Rev.30
The Contractor is aware that a 14mm deep drip groove must be provided on
Clarification on Drip Grove in Precast Segmental Box both sides of the segment. The Contractors noticed that when the segment has
510 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000491 Girder an OCS pole, the drip groove along the rib is not shown in the drawing (refer to MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0062
figure 1).
Clarification on Pier Head Reinforcements of BR104
511 Structural P467 to P470 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000492 Transition Piers Clarification on Pier head reinforcements of BR104 Transition Piers MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4041, -4042; MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0651;
Clarification of Stair Widths for Fire Exit 5 and 6 on Clarification of Stair Width for Fire Exit 5 and 6 on Structural Steel at San MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4444 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3521 Rev.30,
512 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000493 Structural Steel at San Fernando Station Fernando Station MCRP-DWGSTA-AR-3552 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3401/3403 Rev.30,
MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3051 Rev.30
Inconsistency in the width of the stairs. Please confirm which will govern 1.
Clarification of Stair Widths on Structural Steel at San MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4442 Rev.30 shows 2380 mm 2. MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3512 MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3512 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4442 Rev.30,
513 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000494 Fernando Station Rev.30 shows 80+2131+80 = 2291 mm 3. MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3052 Rev.30 MCRP-DWGSFD-AR-3052 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3406 Rev.31
shows 2000 mm 4. MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3406 Rev.31 shows 2000 mm
Connection Detail of SB60M to SC11 on Structural
514 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000495 Steel at San Fernando Station Connection Detail of SB60M to SC11 on Structural Steel at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4216 Rev.30,
In line with this, there is a confusion regarding when the segment has OCS Pole.
Clarification on Quantity of Bar Mark A37 on Segment If we refer to IFC Drawing No. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1302, there is no MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1002,
515 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000496 Type A1 reinforcements for parapet wall illustrated on mid section of OCS Pole. Refer to MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1302
Figure 3 below.
516 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000497 FAT for ECF Strand Factory Acceptance Details. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
The Contractor would like to request approval from the Engineers for the
517 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000498 Temporary Bottom Prestress Bar Jacking Force adjusted jacking force shown in figure 2. For detailed calculation, see attached " No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Attachment 1.pdf"
With reference to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000296, modification of Bar
Mark A27 was accepted as hooks clashes wth PT ducts. But apparently, hooks
518 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000499 Re-Modification of Bar Mark A27 for Segment Type A1 congested at the bottom part of the segment which makes the reinforcement No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
takes time to be installed. Refer to Figure 1 below.
Clarifications on Bar Marks A11, A12, and A29 in Quantity and Arrangement of Bar Marks A11, A12, and A29 in Segment Type A2
519 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000500 Segment Type A2 and A3 and A3 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1022
Clarification on Seismic Restrainer Dimension and RFI is raised by the Contractor to confirm non-objection on the proposed MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4021, 4035, -4055;
520 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000501 Upstand Height of Balanced Cantilever Bridges adjustment in the height of the seismic MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2021, -2031, -2050;
upstand and seismic restrainer dimensions. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1401
1. Reference to MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131 Rev.30, Note No. 9 and MCRP-DWG-
Beam Splice and Joint Connection Details on Structural SFD-ST-4151 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4151 Rev.30,
521 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000502 Steel at San Fernando Note No. 7 (See Figure 1a and 1b), please confirm that this also applies to Beams MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4216 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4402 Rev.30
on Concourse and Roof Levels
Please provide the following:

1. Elevation of W6x20
Connection Detail of Stair Esc 1 & 2 on Structural Steel 2. Connection detail of W6x20 to the column
522 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000503 at San Fernando MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131
3. Connection detail of W6x20 to the floor slab
4. Distance of two (2) W6x20
47 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
Details of Fire Exit Stair 1 & 2, 3 & 4 on Structural Steel As specified on IFC – MC 13x50 stair stringer at Fire Exit Stair 1 to 4, the material MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4443 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3571 Rev.30,
523 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000504 at San Fernando is not readily available and we would like to propose having Built-Up Channel. MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3517 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3518 Rev.30,
Please refer to below tabulation. MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131 Rev.30
According to the RFI response “NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000083” item 2,
shear connector for all bridges type should be N16 with 450mm spacing. N16- MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2077, MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2081,
524 Structural BC01,BC03, and BR105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000505 Shear Connector for BC01,BC03, and BR105 450 will be used by the Contractor for BC01,BC03, and BR105 (Extradosed MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4077, MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4081
bridge).
The Contractor is requested to prepare and submit IFC Drawings affected by the
Format of IFC Drawings of the Realignment in San realignment in San Fernando Station through NSCR-GCR-N02-CSFSTN-DRC-CN-
525 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000506 Fernando Station 000160 (especially in Item 11), which are DRC to ‘NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-PPT- No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
CN-000002 Proposal to Rectify the Piles Deviations at San Fernando Station’.
According to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000057 (Bearing Heights of BC and

Clarification on RL ‘A’ Top of Column for BC and ED ED) Response, the Contractor is required to adjust the elevations of top of
526 Structural Bridges NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000508 Bridge columns in line with the bearing proposed by the Contractor and the rail levels in No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
accordance with the response to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000018.
RFI is raised by the Contractor to confirm non objection on the proposed

modification of seismic pin reinforcements (P24 and P50) placed in the higher
steps (D2’) as shown in the figure below. The step is due to a difference in the
Modification on Seismic Pin Reinforcement of Pier depths of the girders placed on either side of the pier head. This case can be MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0421, -0471, -0473, -0491;
527 Structural Viaduct Pier Heads NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000509 Head with Step, D2' seen on types P5d, P6 and P3 pier heads where PSM is installed on one side and MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4021; MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2021
CIS or Steel bridge is installed on the other. The same case also happens in the
transition piers of balanced cantilever bridges.
Confirmation on Bearing Locations of BR104 Main Pier RFI is raised by the Contractor to confirm the correct location of the bearings in
528 Structural BR104 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000510 Segment the Main pier segment. MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4062, 4034, 4055
Regarding indications of C01 and C02 in MCRP-DWG-SS14-ST-4101 Rev.B and MCRP-DWG-SS14-ST-4101 Rev.B,
529 Structural Substation-14 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000511 Clarification of Coordinates at Substation SS14 MCRP-DWG-S/A2-AR-3031 Rev.E, there is a discrepancy. MCRP-DWG-S/A2-AR-3031 Rev.E
1. The Engineer provided IFC drawings in Rev.16, the Contractor notice that in
Clarification on Drip Groove Removal in Precast some of the revised IFC drawings had the DRIP GROOVE deleted (figure 1) while MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0062 Rev.B
530 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000512 Segmental other revised IFC, such as under the Notes, still did refer to the drip groove MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0062 Rev.30
(figure 2). MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0921 Rev.B
As per RFI "NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000360 Rev. A," the Contractor

proposed omitting the cast in situ concrete of the tendon recess for A1
531 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000513 End Wall Details in A1 Segment segments, as shown in figure 1, and the Engineer has no objection. However, the MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0901 Rev. B
top tendon recess must have an end wall with a rectangular section of 150mm
wide x 160mm height (refer to highlighted in figure 2).
1. In reponse with RFI “NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000501”, Gap “D” (Gap

between viaduct soffit and top of pier head) will be determined as shown in the
table below. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1401, MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4033,
532 Structural Balance Cantilever NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000514 Seismic Restrainer Length for Balance Cantilever - Height of bearing is as per approved Shop Drawings for Bridge BR104, BR105, MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2031
BR110 & BR111 Pot Bearing [NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-DWG-CE-003000 - NSCR-
ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-DWG-CE-003023 & 007121]
Comparing the latest Railing Details - MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3571_Rev.B from the

previouse Revision 30, changes as follows:
Stair Handrails Material Specifications of Stairs, Handrails and The railing diameter changed from 34mm to 42.2mm but the required thickness
533 Structural at San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000515 Elevator Shaft on Structural Steel at San Fernando remains, 2.3mm and 3.2mm. Hence, upon checking with the supplier, there are MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3571_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3571_Rev.B
no available 2.3mm and 3.2mm thick for the 42.2mm diameter railing; The
closest available are 2.77 and 3.56 respectively (See Figure 1).
1. As part of launching gantry (LG) preparation in pier P-503, it’s necessary to

Anchors Embedded in Pile Cap and Bearing Plinth embed supporting anchors in the pile cap. The main purpose of the anchoring
534 Structural P503 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000516 Adjusted Dimension on P-503 for Launching Gantry bars is to temporarily keep the waler in place during the erection work of the No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Shoring shoring system. See figure 1.
Proposed Location of Ø50mm Drainage Hole in Precast In RFI "NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000238" the Contractor proposed
535 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000517 Segmental location of 200mmØ pvc pipe when the width of the pier head (BD) is 4000mm MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0901 Rev. B
and 3500mm as shown in figure 1.
48 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
We would like to clarify the C01 and C02 coordinates indicated on the latest MCRP-DWG-SS15-ST-4101 Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-SS16-ST-4101 Rev.B,
Clarification of Coordinates at Substations SS15 to Structural IFC Drawing of Substations SS15 to SS17. As shown, C01 and C02 are MCRP-DWG-SS17-ST-4101 Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-S/A3-AR-3031 Rev.D,
536 Structural Substation-15 to 17 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000518 SS17 pointing on at the center of Bored Pile X01/Y02 and X08/Y01 respectively with MCRP-DWG-A/S1-AR-3031 Rev.D, MCRP-DWG-A/S2-AR-3031 Rev.D
given coordinates accordingly (See Figure 1 – Typical to SS15, SS16 and SS17)
Establishing the Substation SS17 with regards to its Finished Grade Level (FGL)
537 Structural Substation-17 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000519 Finished Grade Level (FGL) at Substation SS17 against the Viaduct Structure and Main Drainage Line elevations (See Figure 1) MCRP-DWG-SS17-ST-4201 Rev.B
With reference to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000296 and NSCR-ADJV-N02-

CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000358, modification of Bar Mark A11 was accepted. But
538 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000520 Re-Modification of Bar Mark A11 for Segment Type A1 apparently, hooks congested at the outer part of the diaphragm which makes No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
the reinforcement takes time to be installed. Refer to Figure 1 below.
RFI is raised by the Contractor following instructions from the Engineer, to solve
Modification on Seismic Upstand Heights for Pier the problem of the maximum gap between the seismic upstand and the precaset
539 Structural Viaduct Pier Heads NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000521 Heads with 1.1% Slope segment (PSM) soffit. It is proposed to modify the seismic upstand heights for MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1401
the pier heads having a slope of 1.1% and above.
RFI is raised by the Contractor to get the approval for the procedure of the
elstomeric bearing installation. It is our understanding that our elastomeric
540 Structural Elastomeric Bearing NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000522 Elastomeric Bearing Installation Procedure bearing does not have any anchorbolts, consequently the Contractor hereby MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0782
propose the procedure of the bearing installation as follows.
Conflict with the locations of the bearings in decreasing chainage is detected

upon plotting according to the table from MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0423 (figure 1
541 Structural P695 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000523 Bearing Locations on P695 below, red box) and the alignment of the PSM (dimensions in yellow from figure MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0423
2). Kindly confirm that the correct location of bearings to be followed are those
shown in figure 2.
Clarifications on Reinforcements of BR104 Pier Table RFI is raised by the Contractor to clarify the following information from the IFC
542 Structural BR104 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000524 and Segments drawings: MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4076 to -4086
Clarifications on Quantities of Bar Marks A24, and A99 With reference to IFC Drawing nos. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1021 and MCRP-DWG-
543 Structural Viaduct Pier Heads NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000525 in Segment Type A2 and A3 VIA00-ST-1022, Bar Mark A24 has no indicated number of bars or spacing given. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1021, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1022
Please clarify number of A24 to be use. Refer to Figures below.
RFI is raised by the Contractor to the Engineer to confirm non-objection on the

proposed change of stressing methodology for BR111,BR116 and BR104. The
MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2091, MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2096,
544 Structural BC01 and BC03 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000526 Proposed Tendon Stressing Method on BC01 and BC03 tendon shall be stressed from both ends for balance cantilever shown in figure 1, MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4091, MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4096,
the Contractor proposes to switch from stressing both ends to stressing only one
end for the top and bottom tendons shown in figures 2 and 3.
1. Please provide Substations SS15 and SS16 Indoor and Outdoor Concrete
Plinths layout and dimensions. MCRP-DWG-S/A-AR-3051 Rev.D, MCRP-DWG-S/A2-AR-3031 Rev.E,
545 Structural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000527 Concrete Plinth Details at Ancillary Buildings 2. For Elevation, thickness, and Steel Reinforcements, to adopt the typical MCRP-DWG-S/A3-AR-3031 Rev.D, MCRP-DWG-A/S1-AR-3031 Rev.D,
structural detail for SS14 and SS17 (See below Figure 1). Please confirm. MCRP-DWG-A/S2-AR-3031 Rev.D, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3707 Rev.30
The RFI is raised to ask further clarification to the response provided by the
Engineer in NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000528 Rev.A.
The Contractor found out there is a discrepancy on the verified pile cut-off level MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4201_Rev.B
Clarification of Battery Post (BP2-1, BP2-2, BP2-3 & and pile founding level for battery post buildings in NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI- MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4202_Rev.A
546 Structural Battery Post NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000528 BP2-4) Buildings' Bored Pile and Pile Cap Elevation ST-000416 (see Table 1) and latest issued revised IFC drawings with reference to MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4301_Rev.C
letter NSCR-GCR-N02-ZWD-DWG-CE-000006 rev A, N-02; Issuance of Drawings
Issued for Construction, Revision 16 “IFC Drawings Rev 16” (see Table 2).
1. The noise barrier at the inner side of the precast segmental box girder in San
Fernando station has been removed, per IFC drawing "MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-
0085 Rev. 30" section 6. (refer to red box in figure 1). However, the noise barrier
547 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000529 Clarification for Noise Barrier within Station at the inner side are reflected in section 5 of MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0084 Rev. 30. MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0031 Rev. 30, MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0032 Rev. 30
(refer to figure 2). The Contractor would like to request from the Engineer the MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0084 Rev. 30, MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0085 Rev. 30
exact location where the noise barrier will be removed within the Span P-597 to
P-609.
The Contractor received information from the Engineer regarding the location of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0951 Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0952 Rev.B,
548 Structural PSM, BCM and CIS Viaducts NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000530 Clarification of the Ferrule Location in the Soffit the ferrule in the soffit as shown in figure 1. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0961 Rev.B
49 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
RFI is raised to the Engineer to confirm non objection to the following proposed
solutions:
1. With reference to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-DWG-CE-007175 (revised drawings
to be submitted separately, see attachment for advance reference), changes
Column Rebars Affected by the Increase of Seismic Pin were made in the design of the steel pin resulting to bigger pin diameter and
549 Structural Pier Columns NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000531 Dimension in Swampy Area No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
deeper seismic pin recess, however these changes were not yet considered
when the column reinforcements for pier P473 was installed. Due to this change,
8pcs of the column reinforcements will be protruding the seismic pin area as
shown in figure 1.
1. In RFI NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000398, the Contractor proposed

550 Structural BR110 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000532 Clarification on Steel Box Bridge (BR110) adjustment for CIS 50-3 where it causes the adjustment of the length of steel box MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0061, MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0081 Rev.30
girder(BR110).
The Contractor received an extension to the IFC drawing revision 16 this Jan. 9,
2023 where several seismic restrainer types were changed. In summary, 57 piers
with seismic pin type 2 were changed into type 1, and 1 seismic pin type 3 was
551 Structural Pier Heads & Segment NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000533 Clarification on IFC Rev. 16 Extension changed to type 1. It is to be noted that 13 of the affected pier heads have been No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
cast following the previous seismic pin dimensions, while 24 A1 segments are
affected by this change.
In line with the Contractors proposal to raise the elevation of the the pile caps at
the swampy area (Piers P429 to P499, except BR104 and BR116), the dimensions
of the seismic restrainer was recalculated, with reference to NSCR-ADJV-N02-
CSFSTN-RPT-D-000028 design calculation with workflow number WF-007741,
Proposal for the Modification of Seismic Restrainer at thus obtaining new dimensions for types 1s, 2s and 3s. This proposal was
552 Structural Seismic Restrainer NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000534 Swampy Area No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
submitted through shop drawing NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-DWG-CE-007157 to
007175 with workflow number WF-007730. Currently, the said shop drawing is in
Rev B has a NONOC C status while the design calculation is in Rev C and has a
NONOC C status.
RFI is raised by the Contractor to clarify the following information from the IFC
drawings:
1) Similar with pier heads type P5d, the transverse reinforcements P15, P18, P20
and P22, are the outermost bars of the rebar cage for P3; these bars will then
553 Structural Viaduct Pier Head NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000535 Clarifications on Reinforcements of Pier Head Type P3 enclose side bars P11, P12, P25 and P26. As per section 2 of IFC drawings, these MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0621REV B to -0626 REV C
side bars P11 and P25 have an HZ shape while P12 and P26 have an IZ shape,
however all are not hooked in any vertical bar.
a. Kindly confirm this is the correct arrangement of the reinforcements and
correct shape of side bars P11, P12, P25 and P26.
RFI is raised by the Contractor to the Engineer to confirm the geometry of the
seismic upstands of pier head type P3 as well as the quantity and arrangement of
its seismic pin reinforcements as follows:
Seismic Upstand Geometry and Reinforcement for Pier 1. For Pier head P595, the superstructure is precast segment (PSM) on the
554 Structural P595 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000536 Head P3 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0421~ 0423, -0621~0622, -0625~0626
decreasing chainage and cast-in-situ (CIS) deck.
a) Kindly confirm that the seismic upstand for the increasing chainage can
terminate at the pier head centerline as shown in figure 1.
In addition to the proposed modified reinforcement from NSCR-ADJV-N02-

CSFSTN-RFI-ST-509, the Contractor would like to propose another modification
on the P24 and P50 reinforcement on the steps ‘D2’, such that these will be
Seismic Pin Reinforcement of Pier Head with Step, D2' fabricated as 2-J bars connected by couplers. However, due to the limitations on
555 Structural Pier Head P467 and P470 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000537 P467 and P470 the former and since the dimensions of these reinforcements are significantly MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4021; MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2021
short, the distance between the couplers will be 430mm, which is 170mm
shorter than the 600mm required, as shown below. A total of 8pcs of rebar will
be affected per pier head. Kindly confirm non-objection.
The RFI "NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000538 Rev. A" received no objections

Seismic Restrainer Holes for Precast Segmental Box in from the Contractor, as shown in figure 1. The Contractor would like to correct
556 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000538 Swampy Area the seismic hole size for the bottom slab from 355mm to 375mm, as shown in No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
table 1. Please confirm that the proposal is acceptable.
Through NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-PPT-CN-000002, the Contractor submitted the
proposal to rectify the piles deviation at the San Fernando Station and the
revision C was approved. The GENSET building is situated near P-606 and P-
557 Structural Genset NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000539 Genset Building’s Bored Pile Location 606SB and adjacent to San Fernando Station SIG/COM building, as shown in the No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
key plan below. In the above-mentioned proposal, GENSET building in which
bored piles are not yet casted will kept its original location as it is not affected by
the alignment issue and the casted piles on the station.
50 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
We have noticed discrepancies for the concrete compressive strength between MCRP-DWG-STA-ST-4001_Rev.30;
Concrete Compressive Strength at San Fernando the Technical Specifications, IFC Drawings and in BOQ. As described in Technical MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4111, 4121, 4131,4141_Rev.30;
558 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000540 Station Specifications TS200 Section 206, concrete is differentiated in five (5) classes (See MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4541_Rev.30; MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4641_Rev.30;
Figure 1 and 2). MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4661_Rev.30
MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4306_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4532_Rev.30,
MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4636_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4661_Rev.30,
San Fernando Station and Confirmation of Hard Core as Crushed Gravel at San Based on IFC Drawings, all Pile Caps and Foundation Girders are situated on MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4306_Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-ISER2-ST-4306_Rev.30,
559 Structural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000541 Fernando Station and Ancillary Buildings 100mm Lean Concrete + 200mm Hard Core (See Figure 1) MCRP-DWG-ISER3-ST-4306_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SS14-ST-4306_Rev.30,
MCRP-DWG-SS15-ST-4306_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SS16-ST-4306_Rev.30,
MCRP-DWG-SS17-ST-4306_Rev.30
As we prepare the shop drawings for Structural Steel Columns, we would like to MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4111, 4121, 4131, 4141, 4151_Rev.30;
560 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000542 Steel Columns Profile at San Fernando Station verify if possible, to have additional column splice above the Ground Floor Level MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4401_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4431_Rev.30,
of Station Plaza 1 and 2 (See Figure 1 and 2 respectively). MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4432_Rev.30; MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3401-3403_Rev.30
We would like to clarify the response on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000543

Rev.B, as the Engineer have no
San Fernando Station Waterproofing on Concrete Substructures at San objection and confirming the usage of 6 MILS Polythene Sheet on Internal Slab- MCRP-DWG-STA-ST-4002 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-STA-ST-4026 Rev.30,
561 Structural and Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000543 Fernando Station and Ancillary Buildings MSCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3021 Rev.30
on-Grade for the San Fernando Station
and to all Ancillary Buildings.
We have conducted an actual survey of the bored pile rebars against the Steel
Starter Column along Gridlines X17-X19/Y02-Y01 after concrete casting of the 1st
Lift. The actual numbers of bored pile rebars that will clash on the Beam Shear MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4111_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4301_Rev.31,
Steel Reinforcements Clashing on Structural Steel Connector of the Steel Starter Column have been established. (See Figure 1). MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4306_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4311-4313, _Rev.30,
562 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000544 Columns at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4321_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4401_Rev.30,
Though the remedy was discussed on the Revision B & C of this RFI, we would
like to highlight the actual site condition, as follows: MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4431_Rev.30
1. Some Bored Piles are having 4 pcs affected rebars. (As initial assessment only
3 pcs).
With reference to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000534, the Engineer
Additional Column Main Bars Affected by Seismic responded no objection to the Contractor’s proposal to the revised dimensions
563 Structural Column Main Bars NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000545 Restrainer Dimensions in Swampy Area of the seismic restrainer reflected in NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-DWG-CE- No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
007175_Rev.C Table 2, and as shown below.
RFI is raised to ask for reconsideration on the Contractor’s proposal to cut the
Repair of P-477 Column Concrete Surface Due to hooks in order to push the reinforcements to its correct position stick together
564 Structural P477 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000546 Honeycomb with Exposed Rebar with the vertical reinforcement. The items #3 and #4 are hereby discussed No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
further in this RFI.
Clarification for Seismic Restrainer Pin Reinforcement RFI is raised to compile and summarize all the concerns for seismic restrainer pin
565 Structural Pier Heads NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000547 for Pier Heads with Step, D2' (for Pier Heads Type P5d reinforcements on pier heads with a step, D2’. The types of pier head affected MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0645 RevC, MCRP-DWG--VIA00-ST-0652 Rev B
and P6) are P5d, P6 and transition piers of the balanced cantilever bridges.
RFI is raised by the Contractor to the Engineer to confirm if the Seismic Pin and
Clarification on Seismic Pin and Upstand Upstand Reinforcement for Balanced Cantilever transition pier heads for BR111
566 Structural BR111 and BR116 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000548 Reinforcement for Balanced Cantilever Transition Pier and BR116 whould be similar to the attached IFC drawing on the NSCR-ADJV- No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Heads (BR111 and BR116) N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000537 response. The following figures are as per the RFI
response attachment.
Spacing of the Vertical Reinforcement of Pier P-480 & Confirmation on the solution applied on site for the spacing of the vertical
567 Structural P480 - P481 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000549 P-481 reinforcement of the column on pier P-480 and P-481. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
1. Tendon no T05~T08
It has been noted that the location of the dead/stressing end of the tendon has
Proposal for the Stressing Sequence of Precast been indicated in the relevant shop drawings (ex, Figure 1) and approved based MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1131_rev30
568 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000550 Segmental Construction on IFC drawings (referred to as drawing number MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-
1131_rev30).
Fire Exit Staircase 1-6 Foundation Detail at San As seen on MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4443_Rev.30 and MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-
569 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000551 Fernando Station 4444_Rev.30, showing the Fire Exit Staircase 1-6 steel structure. It is noticeable MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4443_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4444_Rev.30
that the staircase is having a foundation (See Figure 1).
Prior to the issuance of NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000552 Rev.C confirming MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3411/3412/3413_Rev.31,

570 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000552 Platform Level Width at San Fernando Station the distance/width at the platform level, the Hyperbeam HY1000x250x16x28 MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR3421/3422_Rev.30
was already procured. The allocated material is 10900mm cut size length.
Please confirm the connection as follows:

1. SB40A to SB100A – welded?
Connection Details of Steel Beams SB40A and SB100A 2. SB100A to PSG22 – bolted?
571 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000553 on Platform Steel Structure at San Fernando Station Affected items are at X01, X06, X11 and X19. MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4141_Rev.30
Refer to Figure 1 and 2
51 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
We would like to clarify our interpretation for the connection of Customer

Service 1 and 2 structural slabs on the steel Girders/Beams. As seen on IFC
Support Details of Drop Slab on Customer Service 1 Architertural Plans and Elevations, the mentioned areas are depressed by MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4451,
572 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000554 and 2 at San Fernando Station 300mm from the Concourse FFL and Steel Girder/Beam exposed approx. 100mm MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3411_Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3441-3442_Rev.31
above the slab (See Figure 1).
The RFI is raised to ask clarification on the following:

1. According to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000416 response, battery post
Clarification of Battery Post BP2 Spiral Detail and BP2-4 BP2-4 building is composed of 16nos of 800mm dia. bored pile (see Table 1), MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4102_Rev.A, MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4301_Rev.31,
573 Structural Battery Post NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000555 Bored Pile Quantity while IFC Drawing reference MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4102_Rev.A reflected 18nos MCRP-DWG-BP2-ST-4301_Rev.C
(see Figure 1). Thus, may we request which reference shall govern for the
quantity of bored piles for BP2-4.
RFI is raised to ask for clarification on the tolerance to apply to the 1.5m
diameter constructed piles on San Fernando Station affected by the Alignment
Clarification on the Tolerance to Apply to the Adjustment. After checking what is written in the project’s specifications for the No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
574 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000556 Constructed Piles on San Fernando Station tolerance of the bored pile, there are two possible values of maximum deviation
of the center of the pile to consider:
The contractor checked segment 11 (refer to figure 1) and compared the size of
the pot bearing to the approved shop drawing NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-DWG-CE-
Modification of Pot bearing and Stiffener in P599SB of 003016 Rev.02 (refer to figure 2). While conducting the checking, the contractor
575 Structural P599SB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000557 BR110(Steel Box Girder) MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0022 and 0062 Rev.30
identified
The a clash
Contractor between
would therequest
like to verticalanstiffener
approvallocated
on loadat condition
support P599SB
during and
the
the top stressing.
tendon plate boltsTo foravoid
the bearing.
a clash between the stressing jack and the front
support and expedite the erection schedule, the Contractor submitted a
stressing sequence for the precast segments which was approved by The
Engineer(NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-TDC-D-000009 – Deck Analysis with Different
Load Condition on the Erected Span during the Stressing Sequence).
576 Structural Stressing of Tendon NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000558 Stressing of Tendon In case of 2 and 3, T5, T1~T3 and T5 will be stressed after the launching of LG No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
respectively. At this point, the rear and front supports are active, while the rear
leg and launching support are inactive. It means that LG will not carry any
segments load and the load due to LG will be transferred through the activated
front and rear support. The load applied on the erected segments is only the
self-weight
In referenceoftosegments.Since
the responded the curvature of erected segments due to the self-
NCSR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000559_Rev.A,
weight see
please is small,
below it detailed
will not affect
lengththe
of elongation
Anchor Boltvalue of tendon
for your to be stressed.
confirmation.
1. Intended for Steel Column.
Length of Anchor Bolts for Column and Elevator Shaft 2. Intended for Elevator Shaft. MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4473_Rev.30,
577 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000559 on Structural Steel at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4401_Rev.30
3. Further, please also confirm the thread length (See above illustrations):
a. 146 mm (Column)
b. 191 mm (Elevator Shaft)
Propose Construction Method in Closing Segments for

578 Structural P467 to P470 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000560 Balance Cantilever (BR104) The approved erection engineering report (NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-TDC-D-000010)
MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4006
su
Modification of Hook Bend for Bar Mark P9 in Column

579 Structural P596 to P598 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000561 Inside Pile Cap of P-596 and P-598 Modification of Hook Bend for Bar Mark P9 in Column Inside Pile Cap of P-596 andMCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0646
Deviation in the Positioning of Bored Pile No. 3 of the

580 Structural P-599SB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000562 Pile Cap P-599SB was affected by the Alignment Confirmation of the Proposal to Increase Pile Length of P599SB-01. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Adjustment
RFI is raised by the Contractor to the Engineer to confirm non objection on the
proposed arrangement of rebars of the OCS in order to avoid clashes with the
Modification on OCS Reinforcements Arrangement on tendon ducts of the top slab of pier segment.
581 Structural Balanced Cantilever Bridges NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000563 Balanced Cantilever Bridges No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
The following clashes between tendon ducts and OCS bars (T22, T19 and T27)
are detected:
The Contractor shall decide how to complete the construction works (i.e.
handover conditions to the owner and/or other contractor(s)) after thorough
consultation and coordination with the parties involved in "Third River Upstream
flood control project (by DPWH)", with due compliance with GS126 to carry out
582 Structural P468 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000564 Scabbard Levee Protection at BC03 Main Pier P468 necessary interface with the relevant parties, and submit such records to the MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4201 to 4202
Engineer. The CNOs (dated September 15, 2021 & August 09, 2022, both issued
by the DPWH to the Contractor) state, as a condition, "4. These structures shall
be removed as soon as the project is finished. bottom and all salvageable
materials shall be disposed off.” These structures are most commonly
52 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
According to TS 2316.10.4, it is written that “Holes for Seismic restrainer shall be

bored true to the specified diameter, smooth and straight, at right angles with
the axis of the member and parallel with each other unless otherwise required.
The final surface shall be produced by a finishing cut.”
The contractor would like to ask for confirmation that the treatment for the
583 Structural Seismic Restrainer Holes NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000566 Finishing Cut for Seismic Restrainer Holes surface inside the hole will involve scarifying and removing any loose materials MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-140
or debris using a scraper or other mechanical means. This means that the
internal surface does not necessarily need to be chipped, as there will be no
tensile force acting on the seismic restrainer. Therefore, it is not necessary to
increase the bonding stress between the grout and pier head.
Detail of Stairs 1 to 10 on Structural Steel at San MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4441 – 4442 Rev.30,

584 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000568 Fernando Detail of Stairs 1 to 10 on Structural Steel at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3511 – 3512 Rev.30
Location of Lightning Arresters for Balanced Cantilever RFI is raised by the Contractor to the Engineer to confirm non objection on the
585 Structural Balanced Cantilever Bridges NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000569 Bridges proposed location of the lightning arresters at BC01 bridges (BR111 and BR116). No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
RFI is raised to ask for confirmation of the proposed conclusions of the analysis
report to solve the deviation detected after chipping on the as-cast pile No. 3 of
Deviation Positioning Bored Pile No 3 Pile Cap P-594 pile cap P-594. After checking the as-built coordinates of the indicated piles on
586 Structural P-594 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000570 affected by Alignment Adjustment No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
pier P-594, a maximum deviation of 13 cm has been detected on pile No. 3 of
the total 6 of this pier.
With reference to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000534, the Engineer

P-499 Column Main Bars Affected by Seismic responded no objection to the Contractor’s proposal to the revised dimensions
587 Structural P-499 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000572 Restrainer Dimensions in Swampy Area of the seismic restrainer reflected in NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-DWG-CE- No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
007175_Rev.C Table 2, and as shown below.
RFI is raised to ask for confirmation on the attained conclusions of the analysis
report to evaluate the deviation detected after chipping on the casted pile No. 2
Deviation in the Location of Bored Pile No. 2 of the Pile of pile cap P-606NB. After checking the as-built coordinates of the indicated piles
588 Structural P-606NB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000573 Cap P-606NB affected by the Alignment Adjustment on pier P-606NB, a maximum deviation of 16 cm has been detected on pile No. 2 No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
out of the total 4 piles of this pier.
Proposed Construction Method of Scabbard Levee The Contractor would like to propose casting of scabbard levee protection as one
589 Structural P468 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000574 Protection at BC03 Main Pier P468 time cast-in-place with H=3.450m. Please refer to the sample drawing for further No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
details.
Bar Mark B7 Shear Link Modification for Pier P-468 Thus, this RFI is raised by the Contractor to confirm the non-objection of the
590 Structural P-468 and P-469 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000575 and P-469 Pile Cap proposal. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
The Contractor proposed shortening the bearing stiffener in P599 in RFI NSCR-
ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000557 due to clashing of the bearing's top plate bolt
and the stiffener as shown in figure 1. The Engineer has no objections to the
591 Structural P599 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000576 Bearing Stiffener in P599 of BR110 (Steel Box Girder) proposal but requests a design calculation for the bearing stiffener and welding MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0063 Rev 30
strength as shown in figure 2. The Contractor attached (Bearing stiffener Check
V.0.xlsx) a calculation to the Contractor's proposal for further approval by the
Engineer.
Modification on Reinforcement of the Precast

592 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000577 Segment Diaphragm, A49 Modification on Reinforcement of the Precast Segment Diaphragm, A49 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1001
593 Structural P-468 and P-469 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000578 P5 and P6 Rebar Details for P-468 and P-469 Column Proposal to Modify Bar Mark P5 for P-468 and P-469 Column. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Precamber value of the steel bridge is given in IFC drawing (MCRP-DWG-BR110-

Request to Provide Detailed Pre Camber Value of ST-0062 Rev 30). The Contractor would like to ask the Engineer to please provide
594 Structural P597 to P599SB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000579 BR110 (Steel Box Girder) camber value during construction stage that includes self-weight of the girder, MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0062 Rev 30
steel deck, wet concrete slab and other miscellaneous steel weight and service
stage that includes all additional loadings at the top of the concrete deck.
Elevator No. 1 and 2 Shaft Requirements on Steel

595 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000580 Structure at San Fernando Station Confirmation of Top Coat Paint for Elevator Nos. 1 & 2 Steel Shafts. MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4471_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3540_Rev.30
Elevator No. 3 to 6 Shaft Requirements on Steel

596 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000581 Structure at San Fernando Station Confirmation of Top Coat Paint for Elevator Nos. 3 & 6 Steel Shafts. MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4472_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3540_Rev.30
Location of Bearing Devices on Structural Steel at San

597 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000582 Fernando Station Location of Bearing Devices on Structural Steel at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4421_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3421_Rev.30
53 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
We would like to clarify the Material Specification of the Shear Beam Connector
attached on the Base portion the of Steel Column (See Figure 1).
Material Specification of Shear Beam Connector on Please confirm and/or provide further details on how the Contractor would
598 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000583 Steel Structure at San Fernando Station proceed. MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4431_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-STA-ST-4003_Rev.30
1. W14x145 to use SN490B or A36?
2. L100x100x16 to use SN490B or A36?
Precast Concrete Panel Support Details on Structural

599 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000584 Steel at San Fernando Station We would like to acquire the following details for the Precast Concrete Wall (W01MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3411-3413_Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3421-3423_Rev.30
Assessment on Increased of Reinforcement Spacing in

600 Structural P469 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000585 Pile Cap P-469 Approval on increased of reinforcement spacing in Pile cap P-469 due to clashing. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
RFI is raised by the Contractor to the Engineer to confirm the total quantity and
location of the OCS foundations in the BR104. As per NSCR-GCR-NS01-ZWE-RPT-
601 Structural BR104 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000586 Confirmation on OCS Pole Locations at BR104 EM-000002 Rev 15 tabulation, there is only 7 each side, similar as shown in the No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
elevation view.
Proposed Modification of Bar Mark B2 for Portal Pier
602 Structural Viaduct Portal Piers NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000587 P5D Pile Cap Proposed Modification of Bar Mark B2 for Portal Pier P5D Pile Cap MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0345_Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1101_Rev.30
Addition of Couplers and Modification of Hooks for Bar Addition of Couplers and Modification of Hooks for Bar Mark P11 for Type P3
603 Structural Viaduct Pier Heads NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000588 Mark P11 for Type P3 Piers – Pier Head Piers – Pier Head. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0621 REV B to -0626 REV C
Hyperbeam HY 1000X250X16X36 Profile on Structural Hyperbeam HY 1000X250X16X36 Profile on Structural Steel at San Fernando
604 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000589 Steel at San Fernando Station Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4402_Rev.30
Shear Studs Material Specification on Structural Steel

605 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000590 at San Fernando Station The contractor proposed an alternative material type for shear studs MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4416_Rev.B
Results of the Testing Done on Bored Pile P-469-06 – No objection to the results of the combined report done by our consultant GPI
606 Structural P469 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000591 Combined Report from GPI about the testing and the analysis done on bored pile P-469-06. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Pier P3 P595 Introduction of Additional Lap Splices to

607 Structural P595 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000592 P11 and P25 Bars due to Transport Vehicle Limitation Introduction of Additional Lap Splice to P11 and P25 Bars MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0621_Rev.B to 0626_Rev. C
Pier Type P3 - P595 Pier Head - Modification of Hooks Modification of hooks & Introduction of Lap Splices for longitudinal horizontal
608 Structural P595 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000593 and Introduction of Lap Splices for Bars P31, P32, P37, links with bar marks P31, P32, P37, and P38 for Pier P595 and similar piers MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0621_Rev. B to -0626_Rev. C
and P38
Proposed Pedestal at Pile Cap Top Level for P-469
609 Structural P469 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000594 Column For the construction of the pedestal, the Contractor will be using 16mm dia horiz MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4049
As stated on TS200 Section 207.2.3 “Tying wire for steel reinforcement shall be
1.6mm diameter (Gauge #16) finely annealed mild steel wire, complying with
AASHTO M32/ASTM A-82 or equivalent.” As referred from the previous RFIs, it
San Fernando Station and Acillary was proven that the usage of tie wires gauge/s #17 and #18 provided more
610 Structural Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000595 Tie Wires Usage at Station and Ancillary Buildings No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
productivity with less exerted efforts. Hence, the contractor would like to ask if
tie wire diameters 1.4mm Gauge #17 and 1.2mm Gauge #18 can be used on
Station and Ancillary Buildings.
Contractor is hereby proposing to increase the top level of pile cap by 95mm or
equivalent to 2.595m new pile cap height. While the other locations will have a
611 Structural P469 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000596 Proposal to Increase the P-469 Pile Cap Top Elevation covering more than the required, the Contractor will introduce a wire mesh of MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4049
16mm diameter spaced every 200mm o.c. both ways for anti-crack purpose
BR104 Adjustment of Setting-Out Distance of Bars B17

612 Structural BR104 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000597 and B18 Track Slab Shear Connectors due to Adjustment of Setting-Out Distance of B17 and B18 Track Slab Shear Connectors. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Protrusion into Tendon Ducts
613 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000598 Stressing Sequence for Precast Segmental Box Girder Stressing Sequence for Precast Segmental Box Girder No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
The RFI is issued to respons to the Engineer's RFI response in NSCR-ADJV-N02-

CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000599 as shown in figure 1.
Figure 1: Engineer’s response; As shown in Figure 2, the Contractor compared
the section properties of the composite girder with concrete strengths of 40 Mpa
614 Structural Bridge 110 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000599 Pre Camber Value for BR110 (Steel Box Girder) and 50 Mpa. In this comparison, we can say that the effect of using higher No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
concrete strength (50Mpa) caused the cross-sectional centroid to shift upwards
by 30mm. However, this movement will have little effect on the calculation result
of the structural capacity of the girder's original design.
615 Structural P469 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000600 Scabbard Levee Protection – Pier Location Exact Pier Location of Scabbard levee protectction No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
54 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant

The contractor observed that during the first step of casting of bored pile no. 6
Discipline of ISER 2, the rebar cage has suffered an uplift movement. While the contractor
Item (Civil/MEP/Archi) Pier Location/Structure Document No. (RFI) Doc. Title has installed the stoppers accordingly Description
it is observed at the final situation the Relevant Drawing (IFC)
reinforcement cage was higher as per table below. ISER – 2 BORED PILE NO.6 –
uplift movement on the rebar cage elevations.
Design Top of Rebar level: +2.590m
Actual top of rebar level: +3.046m
Difference in Elevation: +0.456
The initial assessment found that the bored pile no. 6 founding level and length
616 Structural ISER-2 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000601 Bored Pile Bearing Capacity – ISER 2 Building of pile is consistent as per IFC (38.55m and -38.45 below NGL) but the rebar cage No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
were higher by 0.456m versus theoretical, therefore last 0.456m of the pile tip
do not have reinforcement cage. It is understandable that the pile end tip does
not take any design moment therefore only the pile bearing capacity can only be
checked in this case. The contractor provided a justification in the attached
report where in it considers or assumed a reduction of length of bored pile at
pile tip and recalculate the bearing capacity. This reduction of length in bored
The Contractor
pile is proposed
0.456m, the a fixedare
table below thickness of the of
the summary lower grout pad
theoretical (40mm
versus and
actual
50mm) depending
calculation done byon the type of bearing in RFI NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-
GPI.
000282 and received non-objection from the Engineer's response.
Figure 1: Thickness of lower group pad (NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000282)
If the as-built pier head elevation differs from the design elevation, the
617 Structural Bearings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000602 Thickness of Lower Grout Pad for Bearings Contractor would like to propose a +-10mm tolerance on the lower grout pad No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
thickness to obtain the desired rail elevation. And if the height of the grout pad
must be reduced, the 20mm thick spacer block specified in shop drawing NSCR-
ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-DWG-CE-007470 rev B will not be used; instead, the
wiremesh will rest directly on top of the plinth.
As commented on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000603 Rev.C, reduction of

bolt connection detail between SB30 and SB50 is not acceptable and
Shifting of Beams on Concourse Level due to Escalator recommending altering the SB30 with SB50. (See Figure 1). We would like to MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4451 Rev.30,
618 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000603 Nos. 3 to 10 at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3607 Rev.30
suggest instead of altering SB30 to SB50, we can extend the SB50 (additional
beam) upto SB70M and maintaining SB30 to be terminated on SB50.
We would like to inform you that the Escalator Supplier highlighted its additional
beams requirement on Platform Level for ESC 3 to 10.
Additional Beams on Platform Level due Escalator Nos. *** Typical to Escalators 3 to 10. Figure 1 Referring to Escalator Side Elevation by
3 to 10 at San Fernando Station SCHINDLER, from Concourse to Platform Level. As seen, there would be an MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4141 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4151 Rev.30,
619 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000604 MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3607 Rev.30
additional beam near the X05 on Platform Level to support the Escalator.
Indicated load reaction as follows:
1. Beam at Platform Level – 107 kN (min.) to 114 kN (max.)
The Contractor would like to start with preparing a camber calculation report
and a structural safety check report for all CIS bridges covered by Package 2. CIS
40,50, and 70 → camber calculation report will be provided by the Contractor MCRP-DWG-CIS40-ST-0100 rev. 30,
CIS 40, and 50 → Launching Gantries will pass above these bridges, and a
620 Structural CIS Bridges NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000605 Request for Design Calculation Report for CIS Bridges structural safety check report will be provided by the Contractor. Figure 1: List of MCRP-DWG-CIS50-ST-0100 rev. 30,
MCRP-DWG-CIS70-ST-0140 rev. 30
CIS bridges in Packcage 2. The Engineer is asked to provide design calculations
along with the modeling file for reference only to help the Contractor minimize
the review period.
For BR116 Main Pier P-458 and P-459, 50mm dia. post-tensioning (PT) bars shall
need to be installed in
Column Main Bar Arrangement for P-458 and P-459 at four (4) locations into the pier head as embedded 1200mm length for the
621 Structural P459 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000606 PT Bar Locations MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2045~2047
temporary fixing system for pier
segment.
As agreed and confirmed to offset the splice connection of SB100 from 800mm
to 1050mm, see Figure 1, extracted from NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000607
Additional Beams on Concourse Level due to Escalator Rev.B. However, due to this adjustment of the splice location, the allocated cut
622 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000607 Nos. 1 & 2 at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131 Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3606 Rev.30
size length 8100mm of material HY1000x400x19x32 is not enough to cut the
affected 10pcs of hyperbeams.
According to the Notes found in IFC drawing reference MCRP-DWG-CIS70-ST-
0102 Rev.30, the nominal cover to reinforcement nearest to the concrete
surface of the abutment shall be 40mm unless specified otherwise. See Figure 1.
Figure 1: MCRP-DWG-CIS70-ST-0102 Rev.30 NOTES. The 36mm vertical rebar for
Clarification of Concrete Cover and Access Hole for the 600mm thick abutment wall appeared to be enclosed by the pile cap main MCRP-DWG-CIS70-ST-0101 Rev 30,
623 Structural CIS70 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000608 MT02 Abutment rebars, yielding more than 40mm of concrete covering as required, according to MCRP-DWG-CIS70-ST-0102 Rev 30,
SECTION A of the same drawing reference, as shown in Figure 2. MCRP-DWG-CIS70-ST--0103 Rev.30
1. Contractor’s understanding is that for the abutment wall vertical rebars
closest to the pile cap edge shall be placed outside the pile cap main
reinforcement in order to maintain the required covering otherwise, please
clarify.
55 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
In accordance with the shop drawing reference NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-DWG-

624 Structural P598 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000609 Installation of Additional Rebars for P-598 Column CE-004449_Rev.A, the column main bars for pier P-598 are arranged while MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0646
considering the layout of the pile cap and bored pile reinforcement.
Applying the referenced drawing NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-DWG-CE-

000751_Rev.A, 6 pieces of a horizontal confinement hook with rebar Mark P7
shall be installed on the area where vertical reinforcement pile rebar and
starting bars for the column meets.
Bar Mark P7 Horizontal Confinement Hook Figure 1. NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-DWG-CE-000751_Rev.A bottom of the column No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
625 Structural P596 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000610 Modification for Pier P-596 Pile Cap section. But due to the congestion of the reinforcement in the area and the
actual position of the vertical rebars of the pile that cannot be shifted, the
installation of the rebar is not possible in 4 of the total 6 pieces with the defined
shape of the P7 reinforcement.
BR104 Modification of Bar Shape of PB01 for Segments

626 Structural Bridge 104 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000611 70N-2, 70S-2 Modification of Bar Shape of PB01 for BR104 Segments 70N-2, 70S-2 MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4102, -4096
In order to aid in the installation of the main reinforcement for pier heads, the
Contractor would like to introduce additional chair bars to address lack of
adjacent or nearby vertical supports for said main reinforcement. As per initial
Addition of Supporting Chair Reinforcement for Pier simulation, no severe congestion and clashing between bars is observed. The MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0601 to -0602, -0621 to -0622,
627 Structural Pier Head NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000612 Heads additional chair reinforcement will secure the position of main reinforcement. -0625 to -0626, -0645, -0648 to -0652, -0655 to -0656
Due to interlocking with the main bars, these chairs would also be part of the
permanent rebar cage contained in the concrete. The main supporting chair will
have the shape as shown in Fig.1a similar to the pile cap chair bars, with
additional diagonal bracing as required (for certain chairs carrying more bars)
Part A. Due to the 2.40m-wide trailer bed of the rebar fabricators’ transport
vehicles, some of the bars of the portal piers type P5d will not be loaded
628 Structural Portal Piers NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000613 Modification of Bar Shapes for Portal Piers Type P5d properly and safely. Thus, the Contractor would like to propose the following bar MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0648 to -0650
shape changes so that said bars be loaded onto the 2.40m-wide trailer bed:
RFI is raised to propose additional layer of scabbard levee at Pier P-469. In

reference to MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4201, top level of scabbard levee is +1.282m.
Proposed Additional Layer of Scabbard Levee (See Figure 1).
629 Structural P469 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000614 Protection at Pier P-469 MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4201 Scabbard Levee Protector Concrete Details
Figure 1. Scabbard Levee Elevation: As per drawing reference no. NSCR-ADJV-
N02-CSFSTN-DWG-TW-000132, top level of embankment is +1.50m.
Referring to drawing reference NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-DWG-GT-00318

Coordinates of Viaduct Working Piles at Pier P-599 to P-606SB (Alignment
Adjustment from P-574 to P-645), P-599NB bored piles have a coordinate value
as shown in Table 1 under ‘THEORETICAL’ column. Meanwhile, following the
630 Structural P599NB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000615 Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for P-599NB casting of the six bored piles for P-599NB, a survey was carried out to obtain the No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
actual coordinates, as indicated in Table 1 under the 'ACTUAL' column. After
computing the deviation for each bored pile, a maximum deviation of 0.167m
has been detected on pile P-599NB-04.
The contractor is proposing Fosroc Conbextra GP anchor bond grout product for
the joint connection of scabbard levee segment as highlighted below:
Proposed Fosroc Conbextra GP Anchor Bond Grout of Figure 1: Joint Detail of Scabbard Levee: As per MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4201,
631 Structural P469 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000616 Scabbard Levee Protection at Pier P-469 concrete compressive strength minimum requirement for the scabbard levee MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4201; MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4202
shall be 40MPa:
Figure 2: Scabbard Levee concrete compressive strength requirement.
Approval of location of application of crack mitigation measures during erection

632 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000617 Top Flange Assessment during Erection of PSM and Work sequence advice sheet No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Referring to NSCR-GCR-N02-CSFSTN-NCR-QA-000060_NCR No. 0105, “During the

As-built survey of the bored piles at Pier P600NB on 16th June 2023, one(1) no.
633 Structural P600NB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000618 Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for P600NB of bored pile had deviated beyond the maximum No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
allowable horizontal tolerance of 100mm (As-built report attached) as stated in
TS 200, Clause 204.4.11 – Bored Piles Construction Tolerances”.
56 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
(1) Referring to Fig. 1, it is shown in Section 2 of MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4076 that

bar mark B23 engages BR104 pier segment bottom slab transverse bars B24 at
BR104 Pier Segment - Clarification of Reinforcement the top and B01 at the bottom. Because of this, concrete covering over the top
634 Structural Bridge 104 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000619 Layering for Bar Marks B23 and B19B MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4076
and bottom ends of B23 will be lesser than 35mm (19mm) unless the main bars
will be shifted inwards to compensate for the smaller concrete cover.
In NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000533, the Engineer response is to apply

seismic restrainer type as per IFC Rev 16 ext and apply additional grouting on the
casted type 2 for pier head and segments.
Seismic Restrainer Pin Type 2 for Pier P-516 ~ P-526 Figure 1: Engineer’s Response However, prior to receiving the IFC rev 16 ext, the
635 Structural P516 ~ P526 and P546 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000620 and P-546 Subcontractor had already manufactured 26 pcs of Seismic Restrainer Pin Type 2. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
In IFC MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0101_[C] Pier P428 is added in the table
with type 2 seismic restrainer. The Contractor would like to propose that 26
pieces of seismic restrainer type 2 be kept and used in Piers P-428 (increasing
side), P-516 to P-526, and P-546.
Welding of the overlapping rebars on the Scabbard During the fabrication of the scabbard levee protector precast panel, it was
636 Structural Scabbard Levee Protector NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000621 levee protector joint areas observed by the site team that part of the starter bars in a pair of precast panels No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
at the joint area that would have lapping have shorter splice lengths.
It was observed at site that after as built of piles in Pier P-600SB, that bored pile
637 Structural P600SB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000622 Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for P600SB label P600SB-06 was 159mm center to center movement from design No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
coordinates.
The RFI is raised by the Contractor to ask clarification of BR105 pile cap rebar
details:
1. According to MCRP-DWG-BR05-ST-0021 SECTION A-A, BR105 bored piles have
2x2x25-V1-DB36, however in MCRP-DWG-BR05-ST-0021 PILE HEAD PLAN MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0021_Rev.32, MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0042_Rev.31, MCRP-
638 Structural Bridge 105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000623 Clarification of BR105 Pile Cap Rebar Details DWG-BR105-ST-0043_Rev.30
DETAIL, bored pile appeared to have 2x2x30 main bars. (See Figure1).
Contractor’s understanding, the former shall govern. Please confirm.
A. Bored Pile Details MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0021
B. Pile Head Plan Detail MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0033 & 0043
Due to the proposed implementation of 3-stage casting for BR104 MD (Pier
Segment) excluding the parapet, with the construction joints defined in Fig .1
(red), the Contractor would like to propose the introduction of splices for the
BR104 Pier Segment - Modification of Bars B27, B28, vertical bars in the diaphragm (B27, B28, B30, B34) and the vertical bars in the
639 Structural Bridge 104 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000624 B30, B34, B35, and B05 web (B05). Alongside the introduction of lap splices, the Contractor would also MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4076, -4077
like to propose the modification of the hooks and overall shape of B27, B34, B35,
and B05 for more convenient constructability, with the changes described in the
succeeding sections.
In RFI-ST-000392, the Contractor proposed modification of the shapes and

orientation of Bar Marks A21 and A22 in Segment Type A2 and A3 to improve
the rebar assembly and accepted by the Engineer. However, the Contractor
Modification of Bar Marks A21 and A22 for A3 (5.1m would like to propose another
640 Structural Vuaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000625 wide box) MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1021, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1022
1. Modifying Bar Mark A21 from shape LH to HZ. Similar to NSCR-ADJV-N02-
CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000520, this can be done by combining two modified shapes of
Bar Mark A21 into single stirrups.
This RFI is raised to clarify the final purpose of the Scabbard levee protection. In
reference to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000564 Scabbard Levee Protection
at BC03 Main Pier P468, the contractor proposed to build this element as a
monolithic piece of cast in situ concrete to avoid the water inclusions between
the joints of the prefabricated pieces reflected on the IFC drawings. In the
641 Structural P468 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000626 Scabbard Levee Protection Water Stop response to this RFI, the engineer indicated that “The Sayacan System (Scabbard No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Levee Protection) should behave as 4 layers of 1 m concrete must be connected
flexibly”. And that the element should “flexibly follow the deformation of the
embankment by using rubber pads and anchor pins between the members.” In
the attached report to this RFI response, the engineer states that the Sayacan
System should be flexible to absorb the deformation of the embankment,
As we have received the DRC-ST-000065 Rev.C for the structural shop drawing of
Steel Column at San Fernando Station. We were a bit confused regarding the
Splice Welding Scheme Proposal on Steel Beams at San reminder stated on Item No. 7 (See Figure 1). The Splice Welding Scheme used
642 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000627 Fernando Station on the preparation of shop drawing was based on RFI-ST-000627_Rev.B (See MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4402_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4411_Rev.30
Figure 2), this RFI_Rev.B pertains to the welding spliced scheme of beam
connectors on Columns, selected beams on Concourse and Roof Levels.
57 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
Bar Mark P50-1 refers to the bars labeled here as per response from NSCR-ADJV-
N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000369 Rev. A, which was required to be placed based on
Clarification of Necessity for P50-1 Additional Upstand this RFI: Based on response no. 2 below from NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-
643 Structural Pier Head NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000628 Reinforcement for Portal and Transition Pier Heads 000547, said bar mark does not need to be placed. The typical section through MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0645, -0650, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0602
the seismic restrainer recess in MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0645 (See Fig. 1) is
consistent with this response from the RFI.
As commented on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000629 Rev.A, please see

Figure 1 on RFI response. Further, we would like to adopt this proposed blockout
Proposed Block-out for Earthing Containment at in Substation 14 as well. (See Figure 2 - Earthing layout-red clouds indicating
644 Structural Substation SS17 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000629 Substation SS17 No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
earthing containment area and in (Figure 3) - Cross Section showing the location
and size of block-out.
The RFI is issued to clarify the load transfer condition from LG to the temporary
bearings for PSM(W=10.3,L=40.0m). Based on the note no 2 and 3 in IFC dwg no
MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1132, the span can be self- supported under dead load
after completion of stressing tendons 1 to 8 on both sides, and the load of LG
Load Transfer Condition for PSM (W=10.3m, L=40.0m) can be applied after stressing of all tendons. The contractor had issued NSCR-
645 Structural Launching Gantry NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000630 from LG to Temporary Bearing ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-TDC-D-000009 Rev 1 to propose the stressing sequence for No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
the self-supporting and LG load application on PSM and the report was approved
by the Engineer.
The Contractor would like to clarify/propose the stressing sequence of tendon
considering the actual construction process.
Based on Section 2 of MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2046 (refer to Fig. 1a) Bar Marks P11

and P12 are assumed to be arranged below (Red – P11, Blue – P12) due to the
represented locations of 135-deg hooks, where at each layer of reinforcement,
BR116 Main Piers – Clarification for Bar Mark P11 and there are 4-P11 bars and 4-P12 bars.
646 Structural Bridge 116 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000631 P12 MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2045, -2046
However it is indicated in the elevation in MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2045 (refer to
Fig. 2a) that P11 has the shape “HZ” illustrated in Fig. 2b and only has 2 pcs at
each layer, thus invalidating the arrangement in Section 2
Part A. Confirmation of “Class C” Splice The Contractor would like to verify that
“Class C” Splice mentioned in the response/s below to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-
BR104 Main Piers – Additional Reinforcement for Pier RFI-ST-000632 (Fig. 1a) refers to a splice length of 1.7Ld as per Chapter 12 of ACI-
647 Structural Bridge 104 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000632 Heads 318-83 (Fig.1b), since in the latest version of ACI-318-19 only Class A and B MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4048, -4049
splices are specified. Class C splices were removed in ACI-318-89, as per the
excerpt from ACI-318-05.
Discrepancy in Column Tie Bar Diameter for Pier P3 According to drawing reference no. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0623 Rev.30 Section 3
648 Structural Vuaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000633 Type 2 for pier reinforcement type P3 Type 2, the bar diameter for bar marks P5, P6, P7, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0623, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0625
P8, P9 and P10 is 20mm
As per Sections 3, 4, 5, and 6 of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0648 and Sections 7, 8,

and 9 of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0649, the indicated development length of bar
P51, and correspondingly bar P52 is 500mm measured from what seems to be
Clarification of Embedment Depth of P51 and P52 for either the bottom or the top of P15 stirrups. This is unclear since it is a single line
649 Structural Pier Head NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000634 Seismic Upstand of Portal Beams drawing (refer to Fig. 1). Fig. 1. Indicated development length of P51 bar, taken MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0648, -0649, -0650
from the P15 stirrup. P52 follows the embedment depth of P51 For other piers,
the embedment is based on Table 1 of the General Notes (see Fig. 2a), where the
start of the measurement is taken from the face of the concrete member and
terminates inside the concrete at the indicated length.
In reference to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000635 R1 response, contractor

is referring to previous calculation made by the contractor with regards to P596
– P598 movement of pile cap from 4.05m to 4.50m attached in “NSCR-ADJV-
650 Structural P596NB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000635 Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for P596NB N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000384 Distance Between Piles of P5D on Piers P-596, P-597 No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
and P-598 Rev. B”. The movement of 0.130+mm movement of pile cap outwards
from 4.05m IFC position produce an pile spacing of 4.18+m spacing which is
below 4.50m spacing and above the 4.05m spacing from IFC.
As we prepare the Structural Slab Setting-out and Architectural Floor General

Structural Slab limit against Architectural Arrangement on Ground Level at San Fernando Station, we have observed some MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4121 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3401 Rev.B,
651 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000636 Requirements on Station Plaza Level at San Fernando irregularities. As follows: MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3403 Rev. B, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3521 Rev.30,
Station 1. Slab at Gridline X04-X05/Y02 – Fire Exit No. 5. MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3522 Rev.30
58 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
This RFI is raised to clarify the water stop details of the Scabbard levee to be
installed on P-469. In reference to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000626
652 Structural P469 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000637 Scabbard Levee Protection Water Stop Details Scabbard Levee Protection Water Stop, the Engineer ask for a proposal of a No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
suitable water-sealing material such as rubber or steel to treat the cool joints of
the scabbard levee rings.
The Contractor would like to ask for confirmation from the Engineer if the
arrangement of layers of bar marks P24 and P50 shown in Fig. 3 is viable,
considering:
(1) quantity of bars in Table 2 of DWG No. MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2045 (Fig. 1a)
653 Structural Bridge 116 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000639 BR116 Main Piers - Clarification for Bar Mark P50 (2) arrangement of P24 and P50 as per Section 4 of DWG No. MCRP-DWG-BC01- MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2045, -2046
ST-2046. Please note that in Table 2, only 11 layers of P24 are given, plus the
additional 2 in the seismic upstand/plinth as per response to NSCR-ADJV-N02-
CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000639_Rev.A (Fig. 1b), giving a total of 13 layers.
In Section 7 of NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-DWG-CE-000686, the quantity, spacing

and reinforcement regions of side face reinforcement (P15, P20) and top bars
654 Structural Pier Head NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000640 Distribution Gaps of Skin Reinforcement for Pier Heads spliced with side face reinforcement (P16, P21) are shown (refer to Fig. 1), and it MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0602
is observed that there is a gap of around 300mm between P20 and P15.
Applying the drawing reference NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-DWG-CE-000751_Rev.B
and as shown in Figure 1, 2 pieces of a horizontal confinement hook with rebar
Mark P9 N20 each 100 mm shall be installed on the area where vertical
Bar Mark P9 Horizontal Confinement Hook reinforcement pile rebar and starter bars for the column meet. Figure 1. NSCR-
655 Structural P596 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000641 Modification for Pier P-596 Pile Cap (NB)and drove to ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-DWG-CE-000751_Rev.B bottom of the column section. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
water However, due to the congested reinforcement in the area and the actual
position of the vertical rebars of the pile, which cannot be shifted, installation of
one side of the rebar is not possible because the final part of the U-bar ended
with a hook that fixes the stirrup to the column clashes with the pile’s vertical
reinforcement.
1. According to MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0151_Rev.32 DETAIL1, the column
grooves have trapezoidal dimensions with base lengths of 125mm and 150mm,
and depth of 100mm. MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0151_Rev.32,
Details of BR105 Main Pier Column Groove Concrete a. Section B of BR105-ST-0151 has 17 grooves, whereas Section D of BR105-ST- MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0153_Rev.32,
656 Structural Bridge 105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000642 Geometry and Rebar Arrangement 0154 has 13 grooves. Please specify which quantity applies to the groove. MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0154_Rev.31
b. Please provide the values "a" and "b" as shown in figure 1 to locate the groove
termination.
Finally, in the approved method statement for the post-tensioning and tendon
grouting works for the viaduct precast with ref. NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-MST-
CN-000017, it is written that “The tendons must be protected by soluble oil
every 15 days.” As a general procedure all the strands delivered from factory to
Permissible Interval between Stressing and Grouting the site have been applied a soluble oil cover to protect the strand with
657 Structural Stressing and Grouting Works NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000643 Works No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
wrapping. And at the site, just before threading of the strands into the ducts, the
contractor is applying again another treatment with soluble oil. Based on the
previous considerations the contractor would like to ask for non-objection from
the Engineer of the following criteria:
Further to the approved Horizontal Construction Joint Locations illustrated on

Substation SS17 Structural Shop Drawings, NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-DWG-ST-
Proposed Construction Joint Locations and Concrete 000727 Rev.C (See Figure 1), noting the 1st to 3rd concrete casting sequence, the
658 Structural Substation SS17 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000644 Casting Sequence at Substation SS17 Contractor would also like to emphasize the succeeding horizontal construction No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
joint locations and concrete casting stages as shown on Figure 2, as follows 4th –
Columns, 5th– Roof Slab & Beams and 6th – Parapet Walls.
According to the Bar Schedule table in MCRP-DWG-BR05-ST-0032 Rev.31 and

Proposed Modification of Bar Mark FS1 for BR105 Pile MCRP-DWG-BR05-ST-0042 Rev.31, and as shown below Figure 1 and 2, MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0032_Rev.31,
659 Structural Bridge 105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000645 Cap respectively, 20mmØ bar mark FS1 is a U-stirrup with 135-degree hooks. This will MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0042_Rev.31
link the pile cap's top and bottom bars.
Referring to the sketch and information below for as built position of Bored pile
BP1 on Pier P600NB, it was observed during as built that the pile deviated from
660 Structural P603NB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000646 Deviated Pile P603NB BP1 theoretical position by a total of 153mm. The other piles were recorded to be No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
within tolerance from 17mm to 88mm < 100mm limit.
59 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
1. Pile cap thickness is 2.7m for piers P-660 and P-663 and 3.7m for piers P-661
and P-662, according to MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0041 Rev.30 and MCRP-DWG-
BR105-ST-0031 Rev.30, respectively. Furthermore, the IFC references indicated
BR105 Bored Pile Cut-Off Level and Vertical Bar Lap that the distance from the bottom of the pile cap to the pile cut-off level is
661 Structural Bridge 105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000647 Splice Connection 100mm. According to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000411 response #5, No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
updated table of verified pile length for P-660 to P-663 is provided, as shown
below figure 1.
Given the values in the table, the calculated distance between the bottom of the
pile cap and the pile cut-off level is 75mm or that is, final pile cutoff level – (top
level of pile cap – thickness of pile cap).
P5d Piers - Modification of Bar Mark P15 Closed Hoops As per Sections 3, 4, 5, and 6 of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0648 and Sections 7, 8,
662 Structural Pier Head NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000648 for Portal Beams and 9 of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0649, Bar Mark P15 is shown to have a closed MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0648, -0649
hoop shape.
Due to the P15 bars being fabricated shorter than the intended length,
particularly the overall vertical dimension ”H” as indicated in Fig. 1a, the bars are
suspended in such a way that the bottom legs / bends of P15 are not in contact
P600NB (Type P2) - Additional Spliced Bend Extension with the P31 bars (refer to Fig. 2 for the actual site photograph).
663 Structural P600NB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000649 for P15 Bars ***Please note that is intended that the bottom legs of P15 should be directly MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0601
above P31 at the bottom, shown in perspective in Fig. 1b and elevation in Fig. 1c
(P15 – yellow, P31 group – magenta) similar to the rest of the single-column pier
types (P1, P2).
As we prepare the 2nd Stage of Concrete Casting of Pilecap, we have observed

664 Structural Substation SS17 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000650 Misaligned Column Rebars at Substation SS17 that around 5 columns were misaligned. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Please confirm and/or provide further details:

1. The Stiffener Column Steel Reinforcement Details per Substations SS14 Rev.D
& SS17 Rev.C and Signaling House ISER2 Rev.C is acceptable and can be
Steel Reinforcement Detail on Block Walls at Ancillary implemented on-site.
665 Structural Ancillary Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000651 Buildings MCRP-DWG-STA-ST-4041 Rev.30
2. The Stiffener Column Steel Reinforcement Details per MCRP-DWG-STA-ST-
4041 Rev.B is applicable for Substations SS15 & SS16, Battery Post BP2-1 to BP-4,
Signaling House ISER3, SIG/COM/ELE HSE and Genset Buildings.
We would like to inform you of the typical Typo Error at the Shop Drawings of
Substations SS15, SS16 and SS17 on the Foundation Girder – Web Bar. As
Confirmation of Foundation Girder Web Bar at indicated on the submitted shop drawings, using 16mm diameter (See Figure 1) MCRP-DWG-SS15-ST-4311 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SS16-ST-4311 Rev.30,
666 Structural Ancillary Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000652 Substations SS15, SS16 and SS17 MCRP-DWGSS17-ST-4311 Rev.30
instead of 12mm diameter/as per IFC-DWG-SS15/SS16/SS17-ST-4311 Rev.30
(See Figure 2).
Proposed Alternative Steel Materials for Column SC11, Proposed Alternative Steel Materials for Column SC11, Beam Shear Connectors, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4401 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4431 Rev.30,
667 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000653 Beam Shear Connectors, Elevator Shafts and Fire Exit Elevator Shafts and Fire Exit Stairs Stringer at San Fernando Station. MCRP-DWGSFD-ST-4471 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4472 Rev.30,
Stairs Stringer at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4473 Rev.30, MCRPDWG-SFD-ST-4443 Rev.30
The Contractor believe that the 5mm plate around the sleeve(the rib) will be
Seismic Restrainer Installation and Formwork for the enough to ensure the bond of the segment concrete and the galvanized sleeve
668 Structural BC01 and BC03 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000654 segments of BC01 and BC03 as shown in figure 2 and will not affect the structural integrity of the bridge. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Please confirm non objection on the proposal.
The RFI response of the Engineer in item 1 is to use the 4db inside bend
Clarification of the Inside Bend Diameter of the Shear diameter of the shear connector as shown in Figure 1 below. The Contractor
669 Structural Shear Connector NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000655 Connector then made a sample of the shear connector with a Minimum inside bend radius No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
= (4*16)/2 =32mm and 150mm width using the bending machine.
P5d Piers - Clarification for Column Shear Bars Inside Clarification of required distribution range for Column Shear Bars inside the
670 Structural Viaduct Portal Piers NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000656 the Portal Beams Portal Beams MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0645, -0648 to -0650
The Dimension of Upper Grout Pad at Pier P522 - Non-objection to the casted dimension of the upper grout pad at “P522-
671 Structural P522 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000657 Increasing Direction increasing direction”. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
P5d Piers - Proposed Modified Arrangements of P24

672 Structural Viaduct Portal Piers NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000658 Bars for P597 Clarification of required distribution range for P24 Bars MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0645, -0650
673 Structural Lightning Arrester NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000659 Lightning Arrester Location Request for Approval for the Lightning Arrester Location. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
MCRP-DWG-STA-ST-4003_Rev.30,
Material Specifications of Ceiling Finish C06 on Material Specifications of Ceiling Finish C06 on Platform Level at San Fernando MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3411/3412/3413_Rev.31,
674 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000660 Platform Level at San Fernando Station Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3421/3422/3423_Rev.B,
MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3554_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFDSN-6108_Rev.30
Discrepancy in Pile Cap Dimension for BR105 MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0037 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0038 Rev.30,
675 Structural P660 and P663 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000661 Transition Piers (P-660 and P-663) Clarification of Pile Cap Dimension for BR105 Transition Piers (P-660 and P-663) MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0011 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0041 Rev.30
BR104 Main Piers - Pier Head - Clarification on IFC Governing distribution value indicated in the IFC, whether Spacing or Quantity, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0602, MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-0409,
676 Structural BR104 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000662 Reinforcement Distribution Method (Spacing vs will be used, for some reinforcement of the Pier Heads for BR104 Main Piers MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-0408
Quantity)
60 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
As observed by GCR Site Team, the top and bottom main bars of FG1 along the Y-
677 Structural Substation SS14 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000663 Main Rebar Arrangements on FG1 at Substation SS14 axis were cranked on the intersections (See Figure 1, actual site condition). No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
1. Please confirm the correct quantity of OCS foundation.

678 Structural BR116 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000664 Confirmation on OCS Pole Locations at BR116 2. Please confirm the stationing of the OCS foundations as seen in the tabulation No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
above.
The Contractor received IFC Revision 18 for information. After reviewing the
revised IFC, the Contractor notices that the installation of the Bird Wire along the
679 Structural Bird Wire NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000665 Confirmation of the Bird Wire Installation perimeter at the pier head has been deleted, as shown in figure 2. However, in MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0402 Rev C, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0402 Rev D,
the IFC drawing for BC01 and BC03, the same note is indicated that bird wire MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2022 Rev 30, MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4022 Rev 30
must be installed, as shown in figures 3 and 4.
BR104 Main Piers - Pier Head - Proposed Modification Clarification and / or Modification of Required Distribution for Bar Marks P24
680 Structural P467 to P470 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000666 of Distribution of Bars P24 and P50 and P50 for the pier heads of main supports P-468 / P-469 of BR104 MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4048, MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4049
As commented on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000667 Rev.D, The engineer

requires 3rd party test for tensile & yield strength and elongation (See Figure 1).
Proposed Alternative Material Type of Anchor Bolts for In addition to the Hardness and Chemical Test Results shown in the Revision D of
Column and Elevator Shaft on Structural Steel at San this RFI, wherein the Contractor illustrated that the actual test results are MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4111_Rev.A, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4473_Rev.30,
681 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000667 MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4401_Rev.30
Fernando confirming within the Project required ranges. The Contractor have also
conducted the Mechanical Test (Tensile & Yield Strength and Elongation) last
January 10, 2024 as shown on Figures 2 & 3.
In reference to NSCR-GCR-N02-CSFSTN-NCR-QA-000084 RA, “During the as-built

survey conducted on September 7, 2023, at Pier P600, it was observed that two
682 Structural P600 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000668 Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for P600 bored piles have deviated beyond the maximum allowable horizontal tolerance No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
of 100mm, as specified in TS 200, Clause 204.4.11 - Bored Piles Construction
Tolerances. The details of the deviations are as follows:”
Adjustment of Friction Coefficient for Precast The Contractor is writing to raise an RFI (Request for Information) to seek the
683 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000669 Segmental Box Girder Tendon Stressing Engineer’s confirmation regarding the proposed adjustment of the friction No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
coefficient for the stressing of the tendon in the precast segmental box girder.
Bar Mark P6 and P7 Modification for Pier P-598 Pile

684 Structural P-598 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000670 Cap (SB) Approval for Bar Mark P6 and P7 modification for pier P-598 Pile cap (SB). No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Referring to the approved shop drawing reference NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-

DWG-CE-001213_Rev.B, the two inner bored piles (1500mmdia) which have a
Bored Pile Inside Column P-468 with Modified Bar portion of their area inside pier column P-468 shall utilize 20 mm dia hoop rings No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
685 Structural P468 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000671 Mark R1 (bar mark R1, highlighted in red) following NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-
000133.
In reference to NSCR-GCR-N02-CSFSTN-NCR-QA-000086 RA, “During the As-built

survey of the bored piles at Pier P605NB on 15th September 2023, two (2) nos.
686 Structural P605NB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000672 Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for P605NB of bored piles have deviated beyond the maximum allowable horizontal No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
tolerance of 100mm (As-built report attached) as stated in TS 200, Clause
204.4.11 – Bored Piles Construction Tolerances: :”
BR104 Main Piers - Column - Proposed Cutting and Re- Proposed Cutting and Re-Splicing of Column Main Bars For Proper Placement of
687 Structural BR 104 Main Piers - Column NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000673 Splicing of Column Main Bars For Proper Placement of Pot Bearing Dowels No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Pot Bearing Dowels
Introduction of Crack-Control Reinforcement Around Confirmation for the placement of additional reinforcement around the seismic
688 Structural BR 104 Main Pier NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000674 the Seismic Pin Recesses in the Pier Heads of Balanced pin recesses for the pier heads (main piers) of balanced cantilever bridges MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4048, -4049, MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-2045, -2046
Cantilever Bridges
The Contractor would like to ask for approval of the actual site condition in
689 Structural P-604 NB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000675 Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for P604NB P604NB-03 and P604NB-04 bored pile and that no additional corrective No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
measures on the mentioned pier are required.
Anchors Embedded on P-605SB and P-608 Pile Cap for The Contractor wants to confirm no objections for provisions of embedment for
690 Structural P-605SB and P-608 Pile Cap NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000676 Launching Gantry Shoring the shoring support system on P-605SB and P-608 pile cap. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
691 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000677 Shear Connector Embedment of shear connector using Hilti chemical anchor No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Application of Re-Usable Steel Grout Cap for Top The Contractor proposes to use temporary grout caps in the tendon anchorage
692 Structural Balance Cantilever NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000678 Tendon of Balanced Cantilever at the top slab (specifically for cantilever tendon) MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2091 Rev. 30,
Pier Type P6 - Clarification and Modification of

693 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000679 Reinforcement Clarification of Reinforcement and Modification of Bar Mark P31 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0651, -0652
Pier Type P6 - Clarification of Concrete Geometry for

694 Structural P-599SB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000680 P-599SB Pier Type P6 - Clarification of Concrete Geometry for P-599SB MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0491_Rev.D
61 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
BR104 Pier Segment - Clarification for Reinforcement Clarification for Reinforcement Distribution Range and Quantity of Bar Marks
695 Structural BR104 Pier Segment NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000681 Distribution Range and Quantity of Bar Marks B21, B21, B31, B19b and B24 MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4076, -4077
B31, B19b and B24
BR105 Transition Pier (P-660 and Confirmation of Bored Pile Center and Pile Cap Corner Confirmation of Bored Pile Center and Pile Cap Corner Coordinates for BR105
696 Structural P-663) NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000682 Coordinates for BR105 Transition Piers (P-660 and P- Transition Piers (P-660 and P-663) MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-000661
663)
Pier Type P6 - Pier Head - Modification of Bars P62 P68
697 Structural Viaduct Pier Head NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000683 and P60 Pier Type P6 - Pier Head - Modification of Bars P62 P68 and P60 MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0651, -0652
Transversal Relocation of the Bored Pile P-437-02 to Transversal Relocation of the Bored Pile P-437-02 to Avoid an Existing
698 Structural P-437 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000684 Avoid an Existing Obstruction Obstruction MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0012 Rev.31
P-597, P-609, P-598, P-599SB Adjustment of Setting-Out Distances for Bearings on Adjustment of Setting-Out Distances for Bearings on Pier Heads P-597 & P-609,
699 Structural (Pier Heads) NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000685 Pier Heads P-598, P-599SB MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0447 Rev. 30, -0448 Rev. 31, -0491 Rev. D
1. Proposed modication of Main Column Rebar and Ties/within the Pile Cap 2.
700 Structural Ancillary Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000686 Main Column Rebar and Ties Arrangement at ISER2 Proposed modification of Column Ties within the Pile Cap Area MCRP-DWG-ISER2-ST-4101_Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-ISER2-ST-4311_Rev.30
The Contractor would like to propose one more option to prepare in case of
segment no.1 cannot be casted due to the site issue such as the setting of
Additional Option for First Casting Segment in Precast mould. In such case the Contractor would cast the last segment(ex, segment
701 Structural Precast Segmental Box Girder NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000687 Segmental Box Girder No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
no.16 in span of 40m length) instead of the segment no.1. Please refer to the
below table.
The contractor is proposing to install a one-piece frabricated aluminum covering

Proposed Protective Top Covering of Scabbard Levee sheet on top of precast scabbard levee with minimum thickness of 1.5mm or
702 Structural P-469 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000688 Protector at P-469 2.5mm to ensure that no foreign object will fall on the gap in between Pier P-469 MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4201
column and precast scabbard levee protector.
BR111 Main Piers P-632 and P- Column Main Bar Arrangement for BR111 Main Piers Column Main Bar Arrangement for BR111 Main Piers P-632 and P-633 at PT Bar
703 Structural 633 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000689 P-632 and P-633 at PT Bar Locations Locations MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2045~2047
Pier Type P6 - Pier Head - Modification of Bar Mark Pier Type P6 - Pier Head - Modification of Bar Mark P21 at Location of Pot
704 Structural P599SB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000690 P21 at Location of Pot Bearing Dowels' Recesses Bearing Dowels' Recesses MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0652
According to NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000691_Rev.A response and as

shown below, “No objection Contractor’s proposal to adapt the NSCR-ADJV-N02-
Discrepancy in Column Tie Bar Spacing Between RFI CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000113 Response applicable to all piers except the 3500mm x
705 Structural Viaduct Column NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000691 Response and Latest IFC MCRP-DWG-BC01-ST-2045_Rev.30, 2047_Rev.30
3500mm column. The 3500mm x 3500mm column can still adapt N20 @100mm
spacing if bar mark P5 and P7 are 9 nos. each.”
The contractor would like to ask for confirmation of approval and non-objection
706 Structural P603SB-BP03 Bored Pile NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000692 Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for P603SB. of actual site condition of P603SB-BP03 bored pile and that no additional No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
corrective measures on mentioned pier are required.
707 Structural P602NB-03 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000693 Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for P602NB of actual site condition of P602NB-03 bored pile and that no additional No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
corrective measures on mentioned pier are required.
BR104 Trans Piers – P468 Pier BR104 Main Piers – P468 Pier Head - Proposed The Contractor would thus like to propose the welding of P50Yd with a weld
708 Structural Head NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000694 Welding of P50 Bars That Are Clashing With Column length of 200mm and throat of 12mm. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Main Bars
Bark Mark TB05 in Segment 5 to 12 for 5.1m and 6.3m The Contractor would like to propose to modify the diameter of bar mark TB05
709 Structural Precast Segmental Box Girder NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000695 Precast Segmental Box Girder within temporary blister. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1093 Rev 30, NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000202
The Contractor would like to propose the following modified bars, with
quantities PER PLINTH: 1) 5 sets of 4-BP03x-N20-L-125, arranged to form a
closed stirrup. Lap Length is 550mm as per Reinforcement Development Length
Table for N20mm bars (550mm is 27.5 times the bar diameter). These bars are to
BR104 Trans Piers – P467 Pier BR104 Trans Piers – P467 Pier Head - Proposed complement the existing BP bars shown in Fig. 3a, and to be placed in between
710 Structural Head NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000696 Modification of Bearing Plinths at Decreasing Chainage the existing BP bars. Note that 1.30 multiplier for LD is not applied due to the No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
(PSM Side) constricted space, and since the original bars will still be part of the assembly,
they would still contribute to the overall capacity of the bearing plinths. 2) 5-
BC03x-N12-LL-150, to complement the existing BC bars shown in Fig. 3a. Bottom
of these bars shall be resting directly above the first pour construction joint.
711 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000697 Detail of Steel Floor Decking at San Fernando Station Detail of Steel Floor Decking at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4416_Rev.B
Clarification on BR105 Column Main Bar Termination Clarification on BR105 Column Main Bar Termination on Pier Head (P-660 to P-
712 Structural Viaduct Pier Head P660 to P663 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000698 on Pier Head (P-660 to P-663) 663) MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0103 Rev.32, 0104 Rev.31, 0153 Rev.32
Modification of Bark Mark A22 and A16 for Segment The Contractor would like to suggest that the A22-03, which is a single rebar, be
713 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000699 Type A2 and A3 (5.1m and 6.3m Wide Box) divided into two parts MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1021, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1022
62 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
714 Structural P601SB-01 Bored Pile NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000700 Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for P-601SB of actual site condition of P601SB-01 bored pile and that no additional corrective No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
measures on mentioned pier are required
The Contractor would like to propose the following reinforcement detail for the
Cast-in-Situ Concrete to Tendon Anchorage cast-in-situ recess: 1. Reinforcement for the cast in situ concrete to tendon
715 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000701 Reinforcement Detail Segment Type A2 and A3 (5.1m anchorage will be installed during the casting of MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0922 Rev 30, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0941 Rev C
and 6.3m Wide Box) the A2/A3 segment at the precast yard 2. After stressing work on site, the
contractor will re-bend the rebar to create horizontal bar and weld the rebars.
Clarification of Pier Coordinates in MCRP-VIA02-ST- MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0109 Rev.30 MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0109 Rev. B (IFC

716 Structural P-695 to P-698 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000702 0109 Clarification of Pier Coordinates in MCRP-VIA02-ST-0109 Rev.17)
Proposed Steel Reinforcement Splicing Scheme on FG1 Proposed Steel Reinforcement Splicing Scheme on FG1 Foundation Girders at
717 Structural Ancillary Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000703 Foundation Girders at ISER2 ISER2 MCRP-DWG-ISER2-ST-4101_Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-ISER2-ST-4311_Rev.30
The Contractor would like to incorporate another two layer of reinforcement

Balance Cantilever BC01 and BC03 Seismic Restrainer (5nos-Z1-N12-S-150 Cut Bars on Both ways), top and bottom bars, inside the
718 Structural BC01 and BC03 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000704 Maintenance Access 720-mm diameter shown in Figure 2 to prevent the cracking of top concrete slab No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
of the Pier Segment.
MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0063 Rev.30 MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0066 Rev.30,
719 Structural BR110 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000705 BR110-Steel Box Girder Access Step Details BR110-Steel Box Girder Access Step Details MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0067 Rev.30
Pier Type P3 – Proposed Modification of P11, P12 and Pier Type P3 – Proposed Modification of P11, P12 and Clarification for Bars P30, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0421, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0621 to -0622,
720 Structural Viaduct Pier Heads and Columns NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000706 Clarification for Bars P30, P19, P21 Reinforcement P19, P21 Reinforcement MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0625 to -0626
The contractor would like to ask for confirmation of approval and non objection
721 Structural P601NB-BP01 to BP04 bored pile NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000707 Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for P601NB of actual site condition of P601NB-BP01 to BP04 bored pile and that no MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0106 REV. B
additional corrective measures on mentioned pier are required.
BR104 - BC03 Shape Modification of Bar Mark T02a, Shape Modification of Bar Mark T02a & T02b for Single and Double Blisters for
722 Structural BR104 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000708 T02b for Single Blister (SB) and Double Blister (DB) BR104 MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4102
PSM – 5.1m Wide Box Segment A3 – Proposal of

723 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000709 Modification of Bar Mark A21 in A3 Segment Proposal of Modification of Bar Mark A21 in A3 Segment No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Proposed Angle Bar 125x125mm on Platform Level at

724 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000710 San Fernando Station Proposed Angle Bar 125x125mm on Platform Level at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4411_Rev.30
The Contractor to ask no objections to the actual location of P-600SB column’s

725 Structural P-600SB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000711 Lightning Arrester of P-600SB Pier Column lightning arrester. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
726 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000712 Horizontal Tolerance on Installation of Bearings Horizontal Tolerance on Installation of Bearings No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
The Contractor proposes the bottom tendon layout given the following reasons:
727 Structural BR104 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000713 Tendon Layout for BR104 (BC03) 1. In response to RFI-ST-000526, the Engineer requested to suggest arrangement MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4096 Rev. 30,MCRP-DWG-BC03-ST-4097 Rev. 30,
of the tendon. 2. Clashing of tendons
Request for Technical Structural Design Details and Request for Technical Structural Design Details and Report of San Fernando
728 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000714 Report of San Fernando Station Station No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Clashing Between Fire Exit Stair No. 6 and Stair / ESC Clashing Between Fire Exit Stair No. 6 and Stair / ESC No. 8 at San Fernando MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3406_Rev.E, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3511_Rev.B,
729 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000715 No. 8 at San Fernando Station Station MCRP-DWG STA-AR-3607_Rev.30
730 Structural P-599 Bored Pile NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000716 Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for P599 of actual site condition of all P599 bored piles and that no additional corrective No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
measures on mentioned pier are required.
731 Structural P-439 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000717 Bored Pile Bearing Capacity P439-04 Bored Pile Bearing Capacity P439-04 No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Detailed Drawing and Specification of Removable Request for the detailed drawing and specification of removable grate on
732 Structural Drainage system NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000718 Grate on Drainage drainage to find alternative supplier MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1351_REV.B
733 Structural Ancillary Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000719 Rebar Detail of Stairs at Ancillary Buildings Rebar Detail of Stairs at Ancillary Buildings MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4462 Rev.30
The Contractor proposes instead of using bar shape ‘HH’ for both 20mm-
diameter tie bars, the first 1.0m height from the top of pilecap will utilize a
combination of shape code ‘H’ with lapping length equivalent to 1.0m. By doing
734 Structural P-598 Pier Column (SB) NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000720 Proposed Column Tie Bar Arrangement in P-598 (SB) so, its is expected that the main bar’s arrangement on the chamfered area will MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0646_Rev.30
be adjusted enough to accommodate the installation of remaining tie bars with
the original shape code ‘HH’ for bar marks P5 and P6.
Clarification of Hook Requirement for Pile Cap Type A2 Clarification of Hook Requirement for Pile Cap Type A2 Between RFI Response
735 Structural Viaduct Pile Caps NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000721 Between RFI Response and Latest IFC Drawing and Latest IFC Drawing MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0341_Rev.D
63 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
As ADJV is constructing the concrete perimeter wall fence along the sides of
ISER2. For the ease of construction and due to unavailability of Gate and Fence’s
736 Structural ISER2 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000722 Fence Wall Steel Reinforcement near ISER2 Pilecap Steel Works Subcontractor, we would like to propose installing blockouts on the No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
fence steel post’s anchor bolt/s areas, (See Figure 1 & 2) and re-orientation of
fence steel posts (See Figure 3).
Update of Slab On Grade Steel Reinforcement at Proposed this rebar to be re-oriented wherein the hook will be placed slightly
737 Structural Ancillary Building NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000723 Ancillary Buildings slanted instead of vertically, using the same delivered materials MCRP-DWG-STA-ST-4025 Rev.30
738 Structural NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000724 Noise Barrier Anchorage Proposal for anchorage of noise barriers to deck railings No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Proposed New Location for the Lightning Arrester’s Proposed New Location for the Lightning Arrester’s Hole Provision in 5.1m Wide
739 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000725 Hole Provision in 5.1m Wide Box Typical Segment D16 Box Typical Segment D16 within San Fernando Station No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
within San Fernando Station
Bottom Slab Drainage Hole Relocation from Pier P- ADJV proposes the relocation of the 315mm ∅ drainage downpipe for bottom
740 Structural P597NB, P598NB and P599NB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000726 597NB to P-599NB of Precast Segment D1 slab of the following spans :1. Span P597NB to P598NB 2 Span P598NB to No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
P599NB
741 Structural BR116 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000727 Proposed Relocation of OCS Pole at BR116 Proposed Relocation of OCS Pole at BR116 No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
742 Structural BR110 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000728 Confirmation on OCS Pole Locations at BR110 Confirmation on OCS Pole Locations at BR110 No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
BR110 Concrete Deck - Modification of Concrete MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0031 to -0081 (Rev.30), MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0083 to -
743 Structural BR110 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000729 Geometry and Reinforcement BR110 Concrete Deck - Modification of Concrete Geometry and Reinforcement 0084 (Rev.30)
Bottom Slab Drainage Hole Relocation from Pier P- Approval of Bottom Slab Drainage Hole Relocation from Pier P-597NB to P-
744 Structural P-597NB to P-599NB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000730 597NB to P-599NB of Precast Segment D1 599NB of Precast Segment D1 No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
According to the NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000106 response attached

Location of Lightning Arrester on Portal Piers P-570 to marked-up drawings, one cast-in HDuPVC conduit on each column (total of 2)
745 Structural P-570 to P-573 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000731 P-573 makes up the lightning arrester provision for portal pier type P5D as indicated No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
below in Figure 1.
BR110 Concrete Deck - Modification of Reinforcement
746 Structural BR110 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000732 Annex 1 Confirmation for clarifications and modification of some reinforcement MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0083 and -0084 (Rev.30)
BR104 - BC03 Proposed Post-Drill Installation of

Additional Shear Connectors using HILTI Proposed Embedment of Additional Shear Connectors at BR104 Pier Segment
747 Structural BR104 - BC03 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000733 CHEMICAL HIT-RE-500V3 at Pier Segment MD (P468 MD by Post-drilling and using Hilti Chemical Anchor No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
and P469)
Proposed Alternative Detail of OCS Foundation in Approval of the Proposed Alternative Detail of OCS Foundation in Balanced
748 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000734 Balanced Cantilever and Cast-In-Situ Bridges Cantilever and Cast-In-Situ Bridges No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Construction Method for Protective Concrete Layer on Construction Method for Protective Concrete Layer on the Top Slab to mitigate
749 Structural Viaduct Segments NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000735 the Top Slab or control cracks. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
According to IFC Reference MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0103 Rev.32 Section A, BR105

– Extradosed Bridge end span piers P-660 and P-663 reinforcement, and as
Proposed Location of Coupler Connection in BR105 shown in Figure 1, column vertical main bars’ coupler connections with MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0103 Rev.32, MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0153 Rev.32
750 Structural BR105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000736 Pier Columns MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0601 Rev.B,
staggered location of 600mm are approximately 2500mm from the top of pile
cap.
According to the NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000734 response attached

New OCS Foundation Design in Balanced Cantilever regarding the proposed alternative design of OCS foundation in Balanced
751 Structural BR116 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000737 and Cast-In-Situ Bridges Cantilever and Cas-In-Situ bridges, the Engineer responded no objection on the No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
proposal raised by Acciona-DL E&C JV (ADJV) CP N-02:
New Location of Balanced Cantilever Bridge (BR116) Agreement on the New Location of Balanced Cantilever Bridge (BR116) OCS
752 Structural BR116 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000738 OCS Poles in Between Piers P-457 and P-460 Poles in Between Piers P-457 and P-460. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
BR104 – BC03 Proposed Removal of Drainage Hole at Proposed Removal of 200-mm Top Slab Drainage Hole at BR104 Main Span
753 Structural BR104 – BC03 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000739 Main Span Closure Segment (LS9) Closure Segment due to Conflict with the New Backstay Location. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Please confirm acceptance of the proposal to lift the parapets (noise barrier) at
754 Structural Noise Barrier NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000740 Noise Barrier Lifting and Transporting stage 1 (15MPa) and stage 2 (26MPa). No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Table and figure above showing exact difference in north-easting coordinates of

the bored pile number 1 and number 5. It is observed that horizontal movement
755 Structural P605 Bored Pile NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000741 Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for P605 is 157 & 127mm which is above the allowable horizontal tolerance for bored No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
pile. The rest of bored piles are within tolerance as per project specification.
In order to complete the stirrups and to satisfy the spacing of stirrups for Portal
Beams (P5d Type Piers), some of the stirrups need to be cut at the locations of
P5d Piers - Clarification For Lap Length of Stirrups P15 seismic restrainer recesses (Fig. 1a). For convenience in installation, these cut
756 Structural Portal Beams NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000742 for Portal Beams MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0648 and -0649_[C], MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0650_[B]
stirrups are also composed of 2 pieces that are lapped at the bottom to act as a
single piece of reinforcement, with the following options (Fig. 1b and Fig. 1c):
64 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
For the ease of construction, considering that the Foundation Beams whose
having 700 to 1500mm Depth will be constructed upon concrete casting of the
Foundation Girders (3000mm Depth). We would like to update the Structural
Rebar Splicing Scheme Details of Foundation Beams at Shop Drawing of Rebar Detail of Beam at Foundation and introduce a Rebar
757 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000743 San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4111_Rev.A, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4321_Rev.30
Splicing Scheme that will provide a sufficient space to proceed the backfilling and
laying of 200mm Hard Core + 100mm Lean Concrete for the Foundation Beams
(See Figure 1)
P-663 and P-664 315mm Bottom Slab Drainage Downpipe Hole Approval of the 315mm Bottom Slab Drainage Downpipe Hole Relocation of
758 Structural Viaduct Segment NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000744 Relocation of Span 663 in between Piers P-663 and P- Span 663 in between Piers P-663 and P-664 to Precast Segment D13. MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0038_Rev.30
664 to Precast Segment D13
Pier Type P3 – Proposed Modification of P11 Approval for modification of P11 arrangement, removal of P12 for LOWER (1st to MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0421, MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0621 to -0622,
759 Structural Pier Head NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000745 Arrangement 3rd) layers only. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0625 to -0626,
Proposed Pad Eyes on the Steel Starter Columns at San We would like to Proposed installing Pad Eyes on the Steel Starter Columns for
760 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000746 Fernando Station lifting purpose during tranportation and site erection. This Pad Eyes will be No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
installed on shop.
During the as-built survey conducted at Pier P603, it was observed that two
bored piles have deviated beyond the maximum allowable horizontal tolerance
761 Structural P603 Bored Pile NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000747 Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for P603 of 100mm, as specified in TS 200, Clause 204.4.11 -Bored Piles Construction No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Tolerances.
RFI is raised by the Contractor to confirm no objection on the proposed

OCS Foundation Rearrangement of Reinforcement on rearrangement of reinforcement of the OCS foundation for it clashes on top
762 Structural Viaduct Segment NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000748 the Precast Segments tendon duct.Table below are the affected precast segments with OCS MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1131
foundation:
Proposed Column Tie Bar Spacing for BR105 Piers P- Request for No Objection on the Proposal for the Column Tie Bar Spacing for MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0103_Rev.32,
763 Structural BR105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000749 660 to P-663 BR105 Piers P-660 to P-663. MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0153_Rev.32 and 0154_Rev.31
Approval of Column Main Bar Arrangement for BR105 Transition Pier below
Galvanized Steel Pin.
Column Main Bar Arrangement for BR105 Transition According to MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0102_Rev.32, two nos. of 500mm diameter MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0005_Rev.32
764 Structural BR105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000750 Pier below Galvanized Steel Pin by 1000mm deep void must be cast into the BR105 transition piers P-660 and P- MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0102_Rev.32, 0103_Rev.32
663 in order to install a galvanized steel pin in the pier head. See Figure 2.
We would like to proposed to do On-site Welding of some Shear/Stub-out

Proposed On-Site Welding on Structural Steel at San Beams attached on the Starter Columns (Selective). As we are considering the MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4421_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4422_Rev.30,
765 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000751 Fernando Station actual width of the complete assembly having 4 meters maximum and this will MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4431_Rev.31,
not suit on a Trailer Truck with width limited to 2.4 meters only.
The Contractor is raising an RFI (Request for Information) to seek the Engineer’s
confirmation of adding 20mm chamfer for all Noise Barrier types as shown in
Figure 2 below.
766 Structural Noise Barrier NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000752 Proposed 20mm Chamfer for Noise Barrier Types As per internal mock-up done on site (figure 1), this solution will prevent damage No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
on concrete edges. The contractor would like to request non-objection to this
proposal.
During the as-built survey conducted at San Fernando Station Foundation, it was
observed that two bored piles SF-48 & SF-49 have deviated beyond the
Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for Station maximum allowable horizontal tolerance of 100mm, as specified in TS 200,
767 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000753 Foundation (SF-48 & SF-49) Clause 204.4.11 - Bored Piles Construction Tolerances. The other piles were No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
recorded to be within the tolerance 100mm limit. See figure 1 below for bored
pile deviation as-built reference.
Proposed Construction Joint on Foundation Girders at Due to unforeseen circumstances at Signaling House ISER2, we would like to
768 Structural ISER2 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000754 ISER2 propose a Construction Joints on the Foundation Girders (See Figure 1). The MCRP-DWG-ISER2-ST-4101 Rev.B
proposed CJs are located 5000mm from GL Y02 to Y01.
The assessment conducted above verified the adequacy of actual condition of

pile. Same approach of RFI for other cases has been approved by the engineer
and all surrounding Piles that have PDA tests produce desirable results that
increases pile integrity. It can be concluded based on this that deviation
recorded, it will still not affect the pile cap design, reinforcement, shape as the
769 Structural P601 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000755 Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for P601 Center location of the perimeter piles keeps the design criteria as per IFC design. Based No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
on the previous findings and analysis already performed and approved, the
Contractor would like to ask for approval of the actual site condition in P601-
BP02 and P601-BP03 bored pile and that no additional corrective measures on
the mentioned pier are required.
65 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
observed that two bored piles SF-18 & SF-19 have suffered an uplift on the rebar
Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for Station cage during casting beyond the maximum allowable tolerance of 150mm, as
770 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000756 Foundation (SF-18 & SF-19) No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
specified in TS 200, Clause 204.4.11 - Bored Piles Construction Tolerances. See
Table 1 below with the values as per actual survey data:
observed that two bored piles SF-BP15 & SF-BP16 have deviated beyond the
Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for Station maximum allowable horizontal tolerance of 100mm, as specified in TS 200,
771 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000757 Foundation (SF-BP15 & SF-BP16) Clause 204.4.11 - Bored Piles Construction Tolerances. The other piles were No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
recorded to be within the tolerance 100mm limit. See figure 1 below for bored
pile deviation as-built reference.
observed that two bored piles SF-BP39 (GRID X08/Y01-Y02) & SF-BP40 (GRID
X09/Y01-Y02) have deviated beyond the maximum allowable horizontal
Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for Station tolerance of 100mm, as specified in TS 200, Clause 204.4.11 - Bored Piles
772 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000758 Foundation (SF-BP39 & SF-BP40) No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Construction Tolerances. The other piles were recorded to be within the
tolerance 100mm limit. See figure 1 below for bored pile deviation as-built
reference.
We would like to inquire the Reaction Loads nominated on the steel structure by MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3411_Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3412_Rev.31,
the structural engineer. Through this requested details and option. MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3413_Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3421_Rev.B,
773 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000759 PTFE Design Details at San Fernando Station Please provide the Reaction Loads summary used by the structural engineer for MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3422_Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3423_Rev.B,
the Membrane-Steel Structure interface. MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3501 to 3503_Rev.30

1. The Proposed re-orientation of the PC Wall and will be placed on a conrete
Precast Concrete Wall Details on Fire Exit Stair Nos. 1-4 plinth is further acceptable. MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404 Rev.F, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3406 Rev.F,
774 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000760 at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3517 to 3518 Rev.30
2. The proposed concrete plinth may have a typical W25 steel reinforcement
(see below snapshot).
The RFI is prepared to clarify to demonstrate stressing sequence of tendon

Sequence to Finish the Stressing of Tendon (End of especially “End of stressing”. The Contactor request non-objection for below
775 Structural Viaduct Segment NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000761 Stressing) suggestion. And the suggested sequence is going to be applied all stressing work No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
at the site.
According to IFC Drawing MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0066 Rev.30 and as shown in

Specifications of Ø60 GUM on the Access Door of below Figure 1, Section J for access door detail on end diaphragms has the
776 Structural BR110 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000762 BR110-Steel Box Girder provision of gum with 60mm diameter. This gum is placed around the M20 bolt MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0066 Rev.30
and serves as a filler device between handle lock plates and access door.
observed that three out of our bored piles at SF-P03, SF-P04, SF-P05 & SF-P06
Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for Station have deviated beyond the maximum allowable horizontal tolerance of 100mm, No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
777 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000763 Foundation (SF-P03, SF-P04, SF-P05 and SF-P06) as specified in TS 200, Clause 204.4.11 - Bored Piles Construction Tolerances. See
table and figure 1 below for bored pile deviation as-built reference.
observed that two bored piles SF-P55, SF-P56, SF-P57 & SF-P58 have deviated
Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for Station beyond the maximum allowable horizontal tolerance of 100mm, as specified in No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
778 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000764 Foundation (SF-P55, SF-P56, SF-P57 and SF-P58) TS 200, Clause 204.4.11 - Bored Piles Construction Tolerances. See table and
figure 1 below for bored pile deviation as-built reference.
Details of Bearing Devices on Structural Steel at San This RFI is issued to request the Engineer’s confirmation of ADJV’s Interpretation MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4421 & 4422_Rev.30,
779 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000765 Fernando Station on the Response of NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000765 Rev.A is correct. MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4481 to 4483_Rev.30
The shear connectors reflected on Shop Drawing No. NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-

DWG-CE-005973 BR104 –CIS50-9 3-CELL CAST-IN-SITU BOX GIRDERS CONCRETE
BR06 – CIS50-9 Proposed Adjustment of Drainage due DETAILS SHEET 1 Rev. C, will be revised based on the response to RFI No. NSCR-
780 Structural BR06 – CIS50-9 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000766 to Clashing with Diverging Track Slab ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000258 - Exact Location of Shear Connector with No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Multiple Tracks. However, the previous drainage lines will conflict with the
diverging multiple tracks on CIS50-9 shown on Figure 1.
66 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline

Concrete Encasement Details for Ductbank on External 1. The proposed steel reinforcement of the concrete encasement per Figure 2 is
781 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000767 Cable Containment at San Fernando Station acceptable. MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5200 Rev.31
2. Concrete Compressive Strength to be use is 200 Kgs/Square meter = 20 MPa.
Please confirm and or provide further details:

1. That ADJV’s understanding is correct – Precast Concrete
Supplier/Manufacturer’s Proposed Concrete Mix Designs will be recognized as
782 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000768 Precast Concrete Details at San Fernando Station long as he/she complies with ASTM Standards and shall submit corresponding No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Technical Calculation Report to suffice its design.
2. That the initial design consideration of Concrete Temperature having a
maximum placing temperature of 35.0 Deg Celsius is acceptable.
Proposed Alternative Geometry of Noise Barrier at BC In reference to RFI NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000734 & 000737 regarding
783 Structural OCS Foundation NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000769 and CIS Bridge OCS Foundation New OCS Foundation Design in Balanced Cantilever and Cast-In-Situ Bridges, No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Engineer’s response is to maintain the OCS foundation height of 1000mm.
As discussed thru the workshop awhile ago, we have noticed that some portions
Clarification of Rebar Arrangement on Foundation of Foundation Girders are open and without stirrups. Please see Figures 1, 2 and MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4111_Rev.A, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4311_Rev.30,
784 Structural OCS Foundation NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000770 Girders at San Fernando Station 3. MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4312_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4313_Rev.30,
May we request your re-confirmation as instructed upon for Figures 1 to 3. MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4321_Rev.30
1. Referring to IFC Drawing MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0061 Rev.30 Steel Work Notes

Paint and Protection System of BR110 Bridge Steel and as shown in below Figure 1, Item 8 and Item 9 tackles the procedures on
785 Structural BR110 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000771 Work paint and protection system to be used for exterior and interior surfaces, MCRP-DWG-BR110-ST-0061 Rev.30
respectively. Both items 8 and 9 mentioned “STRIPE COAT 2ND COAT ON 1ST
COAT BY BRUSH AT 75 MICRONS MDFT.” The contractor’s understanding is that
The Contractor is writing to raise an RFI (Request for Information) to seek the
Engineer’s confirmation regarding the proposed connection detail of downspout
786 Structural All Pier NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000772 Connection Detail of Downspout to Pier to pier as shown in figure below with reference number MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST- MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-1351 to 1353 Rev B
1351.
As we have observed the Assembly of Column and the Stub-out Beams for the
Fire Exit Stair Nos. 1 to 4 along GL X01-X02/Y02-Y01 and X18-X19/Y02-Y01, the
Proposed On-Site Welding of Fire Exit Stair Nos. 1 to 4 total width will be 5.2 meters which is not of transportable size when welded on
787 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000773 Stub-Out Beams on Columns at San Fernando Station shop. See Figure 1. MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4402
Please confirm and/or provide further details: 1. That the proposed on-site
welding of the stub-out beams for Fire Exit Stair Nos. 1 to 4 is acceptable
P-698 Proposed Modifications For Concrete Geometry

788 Structural P-698 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000774 and Reinforcement Confirmation for modification of concrete geometry and reinforcement. MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0625_[B], MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0626_[C]
We would like to Proposed installing Pad Eyes on the Steel Girders and Beams
Proposed Pad Eyes on the Steel Girder and Beams at for lifting purpose during tranportation and site erection. This Pad Eyes will be
789 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000775 San Fernando Station installed on shop and will be applied for Girders and Beams from Concourse to No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Roof Levels. Please refer to the attached Drawings for further details.
Clarification on the Value of RL'A' Top of Column for P- According to IFC Drawing reference MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0110 Rev.30, the
790 Structural P-746 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000776 746 value of RL’A’(m) Top of Column (m) for pier P-746 is 31.775 and as shown in MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0110 Rev.30 and Rev. B
below Table 1.
As confirmed on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000089 Rev.A, the exposed steel

structures/elements on Concourse and Platform Level at GL X01 & X19 shall be MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131 Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4141 Rev.30,
Omission of Exposed Steel Structures on Concourse & omitted (See Figure 1). And this also affects the Sliding Bearings on the MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4421 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4422 Rev.30,
791 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000777 Platform GL X01 & X19 at San Fernando Station respective locations. Please see the following snapshots: For Exposed Steel MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4481 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4482 Rev.30,
Elements, Refer to Figures 2a/2b & 3a/3b/3c. For Sliding Bearings, Refer to MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4483 Rev.30
Figures 4.
According to the PLAN-SEISMIC RESTRAINER in IFC Drawing Reference MCRP-

Location of Seismic Restrainer Pin for BR105 End Span DWG-BR105-ST-0102 Rev.32 and as shown below Figure 1, the offset distance MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0102 Rev.32,
792 Structural BR105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000778 (P-660 and P-663) between the seismic restrainer's centerline and the bridge's centerline is MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0416 Rev.31
1500mm.
67 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline

1. For the highlighted in Yellow – splice plate to be cut so that the drilled bolt
holes will be aligned. Final size of inner splice plate would be 155mm x 530mm
Clarification of Inner Splice Plate - 170mm x 530mm x from 170mm x 530mm.
793 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000779 16mm thk for W27x146 at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4151 Rev.30
2. For the Non-Highlighted – splice plate to be cut and to align the bolt holes
drilling. Final size of inner splice plate would be 155mm x 530mm from 170mm x
530mm.
As the readily available Commercial Size for L8x8x12 (A36) is maximum 6 meters
only. However, the required dimensions on the roof level ranges from 7570mm
Proposed Splicing for L8x8x12 (A36) on Roof Level at to 8300mm and this cannot be fabricated on one assembly. To meet the plan
794 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000780 San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4151 Rev.30
and to maximize utilization of materials, we would like to propose weld splicing
as, See Figure 1:
We would like to propose a splicing on the SC11 (HSS 12x12x3/8 Built-Up)

Proposed Weld Splice for SC11 Planted Columns on Planted Columns located on Concourse Level GL X01/Y02-Y01 and X19/Y02-Y01
795 Structural San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000781 Concourse Level at San Fernando Station due to its total length of 6941mm. Per readily available commercial length is only MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131 Rev.B
6000mm.
796 Structural P-695 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000782 P-695 Pier Head Proposed Shifting of Seismic Upstand Confirmation for shifting of location of seismic upstand MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0422_[31], MCRP-DWG-VIA00-ST-0423_[C]
Modification of Compressive Strength of Concrete for An RFI has been issued to propose increasing the compressive strength of
797 Structural Cast-In-Situ (CIS) Bridges NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000783 Cast-In-Situ (CIS) Bridges concrete from 40MPa to 50MPa for Cast-In-Situ (CIS) Bridges. This enhancement No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
aims to ensure uniformity between CIS and other superstructures.
This RFI is being issued to request the Engineer for a reconfirmation of the
provided resolutions:
1. The increased of the 2-sided Pit Walls from 250mm to 330mm on Elevator
Elevator Nos. 3 to 6 Pit Walls on Concourse at San Nos. 3 to 6 (Per Figures 2 and 3). MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4131_Rev.B, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4451_Rev.30,
798 Structural Elevator Nos. 3 to 6 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000784 Fernando Station 2. The 300mm movement of Elevator Nos. 4 and 6 to GL X17 and as well of the MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404_Rev.G, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3406_Rev.G,
Beam SB50 on Concourse & Platform Levels, Total 4 Nos (Per Figures 4b & 4c)
3. The after offset dimensions of First Aid Room and Staff Toilet (F) against the
Elevator
Due Nos.
to the 4 and
6’x20’ 6 respectively
available as 2324mm
commercial size forissteel
acceptable (Per
plate, the Figure 4d/After)
elevator shafts 1
Proposed Weld Splicing on Elevator Shaft 1 to 6 to 6 columns are not enough to built-up weld in one whole piece. For this MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4471_Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4472_Rev.30,
799 Structural Elevator Shaft 1 to 6 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000785 Columns & Beams at San Fernando Station instance, we would like to propose a welding splicing on the Elevator Shafts 1 to MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4473_Rev.30
6 Columns HSS8x8x0.5.
During the as-built survey conducted at Pier P604 center Bored piles, it was
observed that three bored piles have deviated beyond the maximum allowable
800 Structural P604C NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000786 Deviation of Constructed Bored Piles for P604C horizontal tolerance of 100mm, as specified in TS 200, Clause 204.4.11 - Bored No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Piles Construction Tolerances.

1. Cinder Concrete Compressive Strength, 15MPa.
2. Cinder Concrete Density. MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501_Rev.D, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404_Rev.G,
San Fernando Station and Cinder Concrete Details at Station and Ancillary 3. Cinder Concrete Mixture. MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3405_Rev.F, MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3511_Rev.D,
801 Structural Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000787 Buildings MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3501_Rev.C, MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3501_Rev.C,
4. CInder Concrete TS Reference.
5. Signaling House ISER2 and ISER3 – Cinder Concrete changed to Raised Access MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3502_Rev.A
Floor System.
BR105 Main Pier Clarifications and Modifications for A. Clarification for Groove Geometry MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0151_[32], MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0153_[32],
802 Structural BR105 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-ST-000788 Concrete Geometry B. Proposed Merging of Upstand and Bearing Plinths MCRP-DWG-BR105-ST-0154_[31], MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0108_[C]
C. Clarification of Chamfer Locations
68 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
28 = Electrical (E.) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List
Discipline
As per MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5011, The Main Feeder Distribution Line shall be the

scope Railway System (by others) and there is no information or reference
Electrical - Main Feeder Distribution Layout going to drawing provided that shows the Main Feeder Distribution Layout going to the
1 Electrical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000001 San Fernando Station and Ancillary Buildings San Fernando Station and Ancillary Buildings. Moreover, the information is MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5011
needed for the coordination and interfacing with the other building services
including the structural elements.
Electrical - Confirmation of Automatic Transfer Switch Confirmation of Automatic Transfer Switch Panel, the Details and the Location of
2 Electrical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000002 (ATS) Panel the Panel MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5011
Detailed Location of Emergency Call Control Panel for As per MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5710, showing the Toilet Emergency Call System MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5710, MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5711,
3 Electrical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000003 Toilet Emergency Call System at San Fernando Station Schematic Diagram having a centralized Control Panel MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5715, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3406
Details of Cable Containment for Low Voltage In lieu of the RFI No. NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000001. Referring to MCRP-
4 Electrical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000004 Switchgear at San Fernando Station DWG-SFD-EL-5011: Electrical – Low Voltage Power Single Line Diagram. MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5203, MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5011
As we reviewed the Earthing requirements from table below as discussed during

5 Electrical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000005 Station Earthing Requirement for Interface Item 003 Interface meeting on Item S003. We would like to clarify the earthing busbar MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5105, MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5910
requirements, see figure -1 Table with our response in blue.
Details of Conduit & Cable on Branch Circuit Panels at As we reviewed the Load Schedule for Drawings MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5501 ~
6 Electrical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000006 San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5506: The conduit schedule and type of cables are not MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5501 ~ MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5506
specified.
Referring to the Columns perspective and detail, as shown on MCRP-DWG-SFD-

AR-3002 Rev.30 and on MCRP-DWG-STA-3531 Rev.30 (see Figure 1), there is
indicative that there will be a lighting fixture inside the column for illumination. MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3002 Rev.30,
Detail of Lighting Fixtures on Columns at San Fernando This was also coordinated on the Electrical Drawings – Lighting Layout on MCRP-DWG-STA-3531 Rev.30,
7 Electrical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000007 Station Ground, Concourse and Platform Levels, MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5403-5404, 5407- MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5403-5404, 5407-5408, 5409-5410
5408, 5409-5410 (see Figure 2). Hence, we have noticed that the intended
Lighting Fixtures as per Architectural differs from Electrical details (see Figure 3).
As we review the requirements of Earthing and Lightning Protection Layout for

Ancillary Buildings, we have noticed that there is no Ground Rod Pit Details
8 Electrical Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000008 Ground Rod Pit Details for Ancillary Buildings provided. While for San Fernando Station is having (400 x 400mm; Depth MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5003
500mm) Ground Rod Pit referring to MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5003 Rev.30 (see Figure
1).
Please provide further details of the following:

1. Detailed location and orientation for the Incoming Cable entry from Viaduct to
High Voltage Receiving Room (would it be on the Southeast Elevation or
Northwest Elevation? SB or NB? Cable Containment Details – mounting height,
Details of Incoming Cable Entry from VIADUCT to HV dimensions, layout? Etc.) As we must incorporate this on the San Fernando MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5203,
9 Electrical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000009 Receiving Room at San Fernando Station Station Concourse Level Combined Services and noting “By Others” MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5011
2. Detailed location and orientation of Wall Openings for the Incoming Cable
entry from Viaduct to High Voltage Receiving Room. (As we are anticipating the
Incoming Cable/s will penetrate the Façade and Internal Walls, we must
incorporate these details on respective shop drawings)
Referring to MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3620 Rev.31 General Station Schedule of Toilet

Fixtures, all Lavatory, Urinals and Water Closet are having an Auto Flushing
Details of Toilet Fixtures with Auto Flushing Sensor at Sensor/s (See Figure 1) but on the Electrical IFC Drawing MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL- MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3620 Rev.31,
10 Electrical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000010 San Fernando Station 5203 Rev.31 Cable Containment at Concourse Level (See Figure 2), doesn’t have MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5203 Rev.31
any electrical layouts and considered as manually operated.
As we review the BMS System, MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5006 and MCRP-DWG-SFD-

EL-5203 (See Figure 1), MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3002 (See Figure 2), MCRP-DWG-
SFD-AR-3404 to 3406 (See Figure 3). The mentioned respective IFC Drawings
Details of Incoming Cable Entry for BMS Interface from doesn’t show any Entry Point of BMS Cable containment from Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5006, MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5203,
11 Electrical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000011 San Fernando Station Going to OCC Office/BMS Room going to OCC. The BMS layout must be checked from possible MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3002, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404 to 3406
clashes with the other services and penetration treatments to wall partitions.
Figure 1 MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5006 IFC Drawing San Fernando Station-Entire BMS
Diagram shows that the BMS through San Fernando Station will run all through
70 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline
ADJV MCRP-02 would like to clarify if the supply and installation of Generator Set
Supply and Installation of Generator Set at San including all necessary electrical and mechanical connections, complete with
12 Electrical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000012 Fernando Station Fuel Tank, Testing and Commissioning on the Genset Building will be under our MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5011
scope of works?
As per Architectural Shop Drawing No. NSCR-ADJC-N02-CSFSTN-DWG-A-000104

related to the site development plan at Ground level, the perimeter fence MCRP-DWG-SIG-EL-5202,
Electrical and Sanitary Services Conflict with the highlighted in green color showing below combines services for Electrical – MCRP-DWG-SIG-EL-5282,
13 Electrical Signalling House ISER2 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000013 Perimeter Fence at SIGNALING HOUSE ISER2 Earthing Installation Layout and Sanitary Installation. (See below photo – Figure MCRP-DWG-SIG-SN-6111
1).
Lightning Protection Copper Wire Down Conductor at As per the IFC Drawing No. MCRP-PSS-EL-5282, related to the Lightning
14 Electrical Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000014 Substation SS17 including all Auxiliary Buildings Protection Layout Roof to Ground level, the copper wire down conductor MCRP-PSS-EL-5282
showing is concealed in concrete column. (See below photo – Figure 1).
Lightning Protection Copper Wire Down Conductor at As an additional note on the commented NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000014
15 Electrical Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000014 Substation SS17 including all Auxiliary Buildings Rev.A, “For the Conduits, contractor may propose PVC Conduit as an alternative MCRP-PSS-EL-5282
as discussed” (See Figure 1).
Clarification of Lightning Protection Bare Copper Wire Referring to IFC drawing MCRP-DWG-BP-EL-5281, for Lightning Protection Layout
16 Electrical Battery Post NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000015 Down Conductor at Battery Post BP2-1 to BP2-4 Roof Level (Type A and B), the size of bare copper wire down conductor is MCRP-DWG-BP-EL-5281
30mm2 and 70mm2 accordingly. (See Figure 1).
Referring to Rev. Set 18 IFC drawings MCRP-DWG-PSS-EL-5270 and MCRP-DWG-

Confirmation of Additional Smoke Detector at Meeting PSS-EL-5271 for General Substation Electrical- Fire Detection and Alarm System MCRP-DWG-PSS-EL-5270, MCRP-DWG-PSS-ME-5611,
17 Electrical Substations NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000017 Room in Substation SS14 to Substation SS17 Instllation Layout, Schematic Diagram and BMS Interfacing Diagram SS10-SS14 MCRP-DWG-PSS-EL-5271
and SS15-SS21 (See Figure 1 & 2), no smoke detector added in meeting room.
Refering to the IFC drawing MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5600 for San Fernando Station-

Electrical-Lighting Protection Layout Roof Level, the size of bare copper wire for
Confirmation of Bare Copper Wire for Earthing earthing conductor loop (buried) is 30mm2 (See Figure 1), but the IFC MCRP-
18 Electrical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000018 Conductor Loop in San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5600, MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-510
DWG-SFD-EL-5105 for Electrical – Earthing Installation Layout Ground Level the
size of bare copper wire is 120mm2 (typ.) (See Figure 2).

Confirmation of Additional Smoke Detector at Meeting 1. If the HRV unit located in meeting room will be interfaced with FDAS or not?
19 Electrical Substations NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000017 Room in Substation SS14 to Substation SS17 2. If the ACC-01 unit located in meeting room will be interfaced with FDAS or No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
not?
We would like to clarify with regards to IFC Architectural drawings MCRP-DWG-

SIG-AR-3104 for General ISER – Floor Plan, Reflected Ceiling Plan and Roof Plan
(ISER3) and Mechanical/Electrical IFC drawings MCRP-DWG-SIG-EL-5272 for Fire
Detection and Alarm System Installation Layout, Schematic Diagram and BMS MCRP-DWG-SIG-AR-3104_REV.B, MCRP-DWG-SIG-SIG-EL-5202_REV.30,
Discrepancies Between IFC Architectural Drawing Interfacing Diagram, MCRP-DWG-SIG-SIG-EL-5202 for Earthing Installation
Layout ISER3 and IFC Mechanical & Electrical Drawing MCRP-DWG-SIG-SIG-EL-5252_REV.30, MCRP-DWG-SIG-SIG-EL-5262_REV.30,
20 Electrical Signaling House ISER NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000019 Layout, MCRP-DWG-SIG-SIG-EL-5252 for Lighting Layout and Lighting Fixture MCRP-DWG-SIG-SIG-EL-5272_REV.C, MCRP-DWG-SIG-SIG-ME-5608_REV.30,
Layout – General ISER Schedule, MCRP-DWG-SIG-SIG-EL-5262 for Convenience Outlet Layout and Panel MCRP-DWG-SIG-SIG-SN-6111_REV.30, MCRP-DWG-SIG-SIG-FS-6608_REV.30
Board Schedule, MCRP-DWG-SIG-SIG-EL-5272 for Fire Detection and Alarm
System Layout and Schematic Diagram, MCRP-DWG-SIG-SIG-ME-5608 for
Mechanical Ventilation and Air Conditioning Layout, MCRP-DWG-SIG-SIG-SN-
6111 for Sanitary Installation and MCRP-DWG-SIG-SIG-SN-6608 for Fire
As commented on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-DRC-E-000007 item no. 2 and 4,
please see (Figure 1). Therefore,
Confirmation of Addit’l Grounding Busbar Conn. for 1. Hence, this RFI is issued to the Engineer to confirm that the 3 nos of Type-B
Tel. Panel/Civil Low Current Sys. and Swapping 3nos of earth busbars outdoor will be swab with 3 nos of Type-A earth busbars from
21 Electrical Substations NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000020 Type-B busbars with 3nos of Type-A busbars in SS14- indoor substation? Is this swapping will apply to Substation 14 to 17? No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
SS17 2. Please confirm the additional busbar connection to the Telecom Panel and
Civil Low Current Systeme? Is this additional busbar connection will apply to
Substation 14 to 17?
Requesting No Objections to the Actual Location of P-600SB Pier Column’s

22 Electrical P-600SB NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000021 Lightning Arrester of P-600SB Pier Column Lightning Arrester. No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
71 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
Discipline

1. The location of LVSG power source?
2. Please provide access details of cable containment (from building perimeter to
Location of LVSG Power Source for LP1 and PP1 in the panel). MCRP-DWG-SIG-EL-5262 Rev.30,
23 Electrical ISER2 and ISER3 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000022 ISER2 and ISER3 MCRP-DWG-SIG-EL-5262 Rev.B
3. The scope of wiring, termination and installation of containment from the
power source LVSG to the LP1 and PP1 panels will be done by others as per ADJV
understanding.
Location of Lightning Arrester on Portal Piers P-570 to

24 Electrical P-570 to P-573 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000023 P-573 Quantity and Location of Lightning Arrester on Portal Piers P-570 to P-573. MCRP-DWG-VIA02-ST-0027 and 0028
As we review the IFC Electrical drawings MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5505 Rev.30 for San

Discrepancy of Grill Shutter Between IFC Electrical Fernando Station – Electrical – Panel Board Load Schedule), and MCRP-DWG- MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5505 Rev. 30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5201 Rev.30,
25 Electrical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000024 Drawings and IFC Architectural Drawings in San SFD-EL-5201 Rev.30 for Electrical-Cable Containment Layout, the provision of MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3564 Rev. C, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3431 Rev. D
Fernando Station Grill Shutter is only 5 units (see Figure 1 and Figure 2).
Discrepancy between IFC Access Control System In reference to IFC Electrical drawings MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5825 Rev.C for San
26 Electrical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000025 Diagram and in Electrical Specification at San Fernando Fernando Station – Electrical – Acess Control System Schematic Diagram, it is MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5825 Rev.C, MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5801 Rev.31
Station shown in hightlighted yellow color the PDU to Control PC Access which part of
the Acess Control System Schematic Diagram see (Figure 1).
As we review the Electrical and Mechanical, Sanitary and Plumbing Works

MEPF List of Spare Parts to be Handed Over at San Specification (Book 7 – TS 700 and Book 6 – TS 600), there is no specific list of
27 Electrical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000026 Fernando Station spare parts to be handed over. ADJV would like to propose a list of spare parts No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
based on our supplier’s recommendation. (See Figure 1).

1. If we will follow as per IFC drawings which is shown in the cable tray details?
San Fernando Station and Clarification of Electrical Wires and Cables at San Or provide further details.
28 Electrical Auxiliary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-E-000027 Fernando Station and Auxiliary Buildings MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5201 Rev.30 and MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5203 Rev.D
2. ADJV requesting the color coding for the cables since our requirement is
400/230V.
72 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
14 = Mechanical (M) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List
Discipline
Clarification on FAT for Gantry Crane and Ancillaries as included in Item 2.3.1.1
1 Mechanical NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-M-000001 Clarification on FAT for Gantry Crane and Ancillaries of the Bidding Documents Part II, Section 6, Part III A No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Referring to MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5611 Mechanical Ventilation Installation Plan

Concourse Level (see Figure 1) and MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5621 Mechanical
Ventilation Blow-up Room Details at Concourse Level/Station Electrical Room
(see Figure 2), our interpretation is that the Exhaust Air Grille (EAG) is installed
horizontally above the false ceiling, (see Figure 3, for further illustration) wherein
Locations of Exhaust Air Grille, Exhaust Air Louver and somehow the Architectural Reflected Ceiling Plan MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3431 MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3431 Rev.32,
2 Mechanical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-M-000002 Intake Air Louver at Station Electrical Room, San Rev.32 confirms as it doesn’t show any Ceiling Diffuser Air Inflow provisions (see MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5611 Rev.30,
Fernando Station Figure 4). With this our conclusion is that the air suction will be less effective MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5621 Rev.30
since the EAG is located above ceiling and the Station Electrical Room having
ceiling finish C02-B, Lay-In Metal Ceiling with Rockwool (see Figure 5) enough to
block air circulation. Further, the location of Exhaust Air Louver (EAL) differs from
Plan and to Blow-up Detail (see Figure 1 and 2) and no specified orientation (e.g.,
mounting height, offsets, etc.), as well for Intake Air Louver (IAL).
With reference to Mechanical IFC Dwg # MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5608 & 5611, it

has been noticed that there are some Exhaust Air Register installed in the
3 Mechanical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-M-000003 Exhaust Air Register (EAR) Typical Detail ductwork Layout (see figure 1 & 2) that doesn’t have installation and fixing MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5608, 5611,5511,5512,5513 & 5514
details, as not shown also on mechanical typical detail dwg # MCRP-DWG-SFD-
ME-5511,5512,5513 & 5514.
MCRP-DWG-BP-ME-5608,
As we review the requirements for the Mechanical Air Conditioning and MCRP-DWG-BP-ME-5611,
Piston Damper (PD) and Motorized Fire Damper (MFD) Ventilation Installation Layout at Ancillary Buildings. We have noticed that the MCRP-DWG-SIG-ME-5608,
4 Mechanical Ancillary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-M-000004 Details at Ancillary Buildings Technical Specs of Piston Damper (PD) and Motorized Fire Damper (MFD) are MCRP-DWG-SIG-ME-5611,
missing on the Equipment Schedule. MCRP-DWG-PSS-ME-5608,
MCRP-DWG-PSS-ME-5611
As we superimposed the Mechanical IFC Drawing MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5611 (See

Figure 1) into the Architectural Drawing MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3102 (See Figure 2)
Mechanical Airconditioning and Ventilation on the Security Room, considering the required Ceiling finished height 3000mm
5 Mechanical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-M-000005 Component for Security Room Clashes with Viaduct at from Concourse FFL and the bottom of Viaduct segment at 3400mm from
San Fernando Station Concourse FFL (See Figure 3), positioning of the EF-06 and its Component/s will MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5611, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3102
not be possible. The gap between the two mentioned structures is not enough to
accommodate the EF-06 + ducting layouts. To further visualize the scenario,
please see Figure 4 3D Snapshots.
Detailed Enclosure Support for Condensing Units at As per drawing no. MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5514 for Mechanical -Typical Details,
6 Mechanical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-M-000006 San Fernando Station the support detail showing for double outdoor unit overlap installation is not MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5514 and MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5641
applicable to install the condensing units in Concourse Level. (See below photo).
As per IFC Mechanical drawing No. MCRP-DWG-SIG-ME-5601 and MCRP-DWG-

Verification of Air Conditioning Indoor unit in Signaling SIG-ME-5611 related to Mechanical Air-Conditioning Unit, the air conditioning
Signalling House Equipment Room at SIGNALING HOUSE ISER2 and and ventilation system diagram showing in Figures 1 is split type unit, but the
7 Mechanical ISER2 & ISER3 NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-M-000007 equipment name tag is under floor type as reflected on the equipment schedule MCRP-DWG-SIG-ME-5601, MCRP-DWG-SIG-ME-5611
ISER3
(See Figure 2). In the Architectural Shop drawings showing in Figures 3 & 4
section and plan detailed, there’s no raise floor in Signaling Equipment room.
Referring to IFC drawings MCRP-DWG-PSS-ME-5608 and MCRP-DWG-PSS-ME-

5611 for General Substation Mechanical Airconditioning and Ventilation
Confirmation of Mechanical Ventilation Installation Installation Layout (SS10-SS18) and Mechanical Equipment Schedule (SS10-SS18),
8 Mechanical Substations NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-M-000008 Layout and Equipment Schedule in Substation SS14- (See Figure 1 & 2), there’s 2 units of exhaust fan w/ MFD, 1 unit PRD and 2 units MCRP-DWG-PSS-ME-5608, MCRP-DWG-PSS-ME-5611,
SS17 Intake Air Louver w/ MFD. But the IFC drawings MCRP-DWG-PSS-EL-5262 and MCRP-DWG-PSS-EL-5262, MCRP-DWG-PSS-EL-5263.
MCRP-DWG-PSS-EL-5263 for General Substation Electrical-Convenience Outlet
Layout, there’s 3 units of exhaust fan (See Figure 3 & 4).
73 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
14 = Mechanical (M) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List
Discipline
Referring to IFC Architectural drawing MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3431_REV.D (See

Figure 1) and MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3421_REV.B (See Figure 2), it showns in MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3431_REV.D, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3421_REV.B,
9 Mechanical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-M-000009 Details of Smoke Proof Curtain at San Fernando Station Architectural IFC drawing layout and section detail the smoke proof curtain as MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3555_REV.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5701_REV.D,
highlighted in orange color. In addtion, the support detail of smoke curtain in MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5801_REV.31
MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3555_REV.30 (See Figure 3).
As we review the IFC Mechanical drawings MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5641_REV.C in

San Fernando Station – Mechanical Air Conditioning Installation Plan Concourse
Access Panel for Air Conditioning Outdoor Units in Level, the A/C outdoor units installed above the ceiling area in Concourse level MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5641_REV.C
10 Mechanical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-M-000010 Concourse Level at San Fernando Station (see highlighted in orange color in figure 1) in which no access panel allocated
for maintenance purposes. Section Views (See Figure 2 & 3).
In reference to IFC Mechanical drawing MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5511_REV.30 for

Mechanical – Typical Details in San Fernando Station, where the typical split A/C
installation for Electrical Building shows the spur outlet to double pole switch
San Fernando Station and Confirmation of Split A/C Unit Installation in San and a remote controller (see figure 1). The cable containment layout and MCRP-DWG-SIG-EL-5262_REV.30, MCRP-DWG-BP-EL-5262_REV.30,
11 Mechanical Auxiliary Buildings NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-M-000011 Fernando Station and Auxiliary Buildings convenience outlet layout plan in IFC Electrical drawings of SFD Station,General MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5511_REV.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5203_REV.D
ISER and General Battery Post which is highlighted in yellow color see (figure 2,3
and 4) is different which shows the connection of split unit to double pole switch
and a thermostat.
In reference to IFC Mechanical drawing MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5641_REV.C for San

Fernando Station Mechanical – Air Conditioning Installation Plan – Concourse
Confirmation of Location of AC Outdoor Unit Serving Level (See Figure 1), it is shown in highlighted orange color the A/C Condensing
12 Mechanical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-M-000012 High Voltage, AFC Room / AFC UPS Room and Unit Stack Suspended with Frame above Concourse level ceiling (See tabulation MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5641_REV.C
Costumer Service Room 1 & 2 at San Fernando Station in Figure 2). However, there is inconsistency in the IFC Architectural drawing ref MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3411_REV.B
no. MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3411_REV.B, the location of A/C Outdoor Unit is above
the Station Plaza 1/GF level ceiling (See Figure 3).

1. ADJV would like to request the power supply provision for the additional 1
Power Supply Provision for Additional 1 Wall Mounted wall mounted split unit in BFR . MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5641 Rev.D, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5661 Rev.C
13 Mechanical San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-M-000013 AC Split Unit in BFR at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5631 Rev.30
2. The ventilation extract fan and fresh air coming from door louver will be no
longer required in BFR.
Power Supply Provision for Additional 2 Wall Mounted Please confirm and/or provide further details: MCRP-DWG-BP-ME-5608 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5661 Rev.C
14 Mechanical Battery Post NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-M-000014 AC Split Unit at Battery Post (Type A & B) 1. Kindly provide the power supply provision for the additional 2 A/C wall MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5631 Rev.30.
mounted units.
74 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
9 = Fire Protection (FP) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List
Discipline
Provision of Firewater tank drain outlet and Fire Pump accessories and the
1 Fire Protection San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-FP-000001 Firewater Pump System control line MCRP-DWG-SFD-FS-6621_Rev.30
1. Pressure Reducing Station Requirement:

2. Drain line going to the main drainage system:
1. With Reference to the IFC DWG# MCRP-DWG-SFD-FS-6608 & 6601, the
2 Fire Protection San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-FP-000002 Fire Protection- Pressure Regulation Station location and requirements of the Pressure Reducing Station (PRS) is not shown MCRP-DWG-SFD-EL-5011
but in the detail IFC DWG# MCRP-DWG-SFD-FS-6513 the
PRS is shown and detailed (see figure 1) . Please advise if the said PRS station is
not required or provide the updated IFC Drawing if it is required to the system.
MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5616,
Mismatched Firewater Pump Skid Location and With reference to IFC Dwg # MCRP-DWG-SFD-FS-6621 (Figure 1) the location and MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3453,
3 Fire Protection San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-FP-000003 Orientation orientation of the firewater pumping station is not matching to MCRP-DWG-SFD- MCRP-DWG-SFD-FS-6608,
FS-6608 (Figure 2) & MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3453 (Figure 3) MCRP-DWG-SFD-FS-6621
With reference to IFC Dwg # MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3431, Reflected Ceiling Plan

Firewater Sprinkler Detail on Rooms with a False (See Figure 1 & 3). The highlighted rooms at Ground and Concourse Levels are
4 Fire Protection San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-FP-000004 Ceiling Attached with reflected false ceiling attached and to be protected with Firewater Sprinkler MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3431, MCRP-DWG-SFD-FS-6608, 6611 and 6513
System (See Figure 2 & 4).
Confirmation for the Landing or Fire Hose Valve With reference to the Technical Specification 630.3.1.1.2 “Wet-rise hydrant MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3431,
5 Fire Protection San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-FP-000005 Requirement at San Fernando Station system complete with fire brigade inlet breechings and landing valves”. MCRP-DWG-SFD-FS-6608, 6611 and 6513
With reference to IFC Dwg # MCRP-DWG-SFD-FS-6621, It shows that there are 4
Fire Protection - Confirmation of 4 Units of Floatless nos. of floatless level switches to be interlocked with the fire pump and jockey
6 Fire Protection San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-FP-000006 Water Switches and Firewater Tank Partition pump controller and each level switch will monitor the low and high levels of MCRP-DWG-SFD-FS-6621
water inside the tank.
Confirmation of Fire and Jockey Pumps Capacity at San We would like to clarify the Fire and Jockey Pumps Capacity to be utilized at San
7 Fire Protection San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-FP-000007 Fernando Station Fernando Station. We have observed discrepancies between the IFC Drawings MCRP-DWG-SFD-FS-6631_REV.30
and Specifications (See below tabulation).
Clarification of Novec-1230 Fire Suppression System at As we reviewed the Layout and Equipment Schedule of Fire System FASS (NOVEC MCRP- DWG-PSS-FS-6601 Rev. 30,
8 Fire Protection Substations NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-FP-000008 Substations SS14-SS17 1230) in Substations SS14-SS17 (See below Figures 1.a and 1.b). MCRP- DWG-PSS-FS-6608 Rev. 30,
MCRP- DWG-PSS-FS-6611 Rev. 30
In reference to IFC Architectural drawings MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3101 Rev.D, it is
Confirmation of Fire Hydrate Provision at San shown in (Figure 1) the 3 Fire Hydrate location highlighted in yellow color. MCRP-DWG-SFD-FS-6608 Rev.30,
9 Fire Protection San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-FP-000009 Fernando Station However, in IFC Fire System drawings MCRP-DWG-SFD-FS-6608 Rev.30 see MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3101 Rev.D
(Figure 2); there’s no connection and provision for external Fire Hydrate.
75 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
15 = Sanitary (SN) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List
Discipline
1. Elevator pit pumping line installation detail.

2. Type of Pipe Fitting detail.
1 Sanitary San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-SN-000001 Sanitary System-Elevator Pit Pumping Details 3. Clarification to the mismatched information between the schematic and detail MCRP-DWG-SFD-PL-6001,6011,6012,6013,6104,6111 & 6021
drawing.
1.Revised layout for the Sanitary Drawing

As per our interpretation, vertical installation of pipes and fixture along with the
Sanitary System - Ground Level Clashes with the foundation girder and structural beam is not allowed to be installed.
2 Sanitary San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-SN-000002 Foundation Girder and Structural Beam With the combination of Sanitary and Structure drawing, it was found out there MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6104, MCRP-DWG-SFD-ST-4111
are some vertical pipes and fixtures (FD & FCO ) are clash with the structural
elements. ( See below sketch 1 & 2).
Station - Storm Drain and Waste Downspout Fixing and 1. Station – Storm Drain and Waste Downspout Fixing and Support Details.
3 Sanitary San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-SN-000003 Support Details As per Sanitary IFC Dwg # MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6104, The storm drain and waste MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6104, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3531
pipe downspout to be fixed along with the column as shown Figure 1.
1. Provision of the drain ditch and drainage piping layout

As Per Technical Specification TS600, Section 614.3.3.1, “The pump foundation
shall be provided with a surrounding drain ditch and cleanouts (w/covers) on its
Sanitary- Provision of the Drain Ditch and Drainage surface. Drain water shall be led to the nearest drainage system by the steel pipe
4 Sanitary San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-SN-000004 Piping Layout (galvanized steel pipe), etc.” MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6104; MCRP-DWG-SFD-PL-5831
With the related Plumbing IFC Dwg# MCRP-DWG-SFD-PL-5831 (Figure 1) and
Sanitary IFC Dwg# MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6104 (Figure 2), there are no provisions
of drain ditch and drainage piping layout are shown in the drawing as required
by the project specification as stated above (see figure 1).
With reference to Architecture Dwg # MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-

Stormwater Line along Station Secondary Ceiling 3411,3412,3413,3421,3422 the ceiling drain going to the downspout inside the MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3411,3412,3412,3421,3422,
5 Sanitary San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-SN-000005 Concourse Level column, the stainless-steel gutter and the metal suspended ceiling can be seen MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6102,6106
(see below figure 1 to 2)
A. Wastewater Discharge; Referring to MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6101 & 6104_Rev.30 MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6101 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6102 Rev.30,
San Fernando Station Waste and Storm Water (see Figure 1 & 2) - it shows that the wastewater discharge line from the station MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6104 Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6104 Rev.30,
6 Sanitary San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-SN-000006 Discharging Network building is going to a Civil Drainage network, but there is no given details of this MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6106 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-DR-2300 Rev.30,
drainage structure such as its soze, elevation, orientation, exact location, etc.
Upon the review of Sanitary IFC Drawing MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6121 Condensate

Drain Installation (See Figure 1), it has been noticed that the locations of the
Confirmation on location of Air Conditioning Units Wall Type Air Conditioning Unit (ACW-02) are not matching with the Mechanical MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6121,
7 Sanitary Substations NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-SN-000007 (Wall Type) at Substations SS14-SS17 MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5608
IFC Drawing MCRP-DWG-SFD-ME-5608 Airconditioning and Ventilation
Installation Layouts (See Figure 2).
Referring to MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR- 3404, 3405 & 3406, The Trench Gutter was
Detail of Drainage Line for Trench Gutter on Concourse shown along the concourse level (Figure 1,2 & 3), while in the Sanitary IFC Dwg# MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR- 3404, 3405 & 3406;
8 Sanitary San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-SN-000008 at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN- 6106, there is no trench gutter has been shown and no MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN- 6106
provision of piping line to drain the water.
Confirmation of Downspout Material Type at San We would like to clarify the Downspout Material Type for Rain Water to be MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6104_Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6106_Rev.B
9 Sanitary San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-SN-000009 Fernando Station utilized at San Fernando Station. We have observed discrepancies between the MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6108_Rev.30
IFC Drawings and Specifications (See below tabulation).
In reference to RFI - NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-SN-000010_Rev.B with regards
Confirmation and Approval of Additional Lifting Station to the additional lifting station on the Wastewater Treatment Plant, the Engineer
10 Sanitary San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-SN-000010 and Machine Room Requirement for Wastewater confirms as ”Presentation with DOTr have been done on the 5th April 2024, No IFC Drawing reference seen on RFI
Treatment Plant at San Fernando Station Please wait for DOTr reply” (See Figure 1).
Referring to IFC drawings MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6104 Rev.C for San Fernando

Station Sanitary Installation – Ground Floor Level (See Figure 1) and MCRP-DWG-
Confirmation of Tapping Point Connection of Urinal SFD-SN-6107 Rev. B for San Fernando Station Sanitary Installation – Concourse
11 Sanitary San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-SN-000011 Drain Pipe at San Fernando Station Level Toilet Blow-up(See Figure 2), it shown in highlighted yellow color the MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6104 Rev.C, MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6107 Rev.B
connection of Urinal drain pipe is in Waste Pipe. However, in some connection
the Urinal drain pipe is connected in Soil Pipe (See Table inFigure 3.)
76 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
15 = Sanitary (SN) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List
Discipline
As we review the Provision of Downspouts on San Fernando Station –

Roof/Platform Level, with respect to the RFI-ST-000660 Rev.B, wherein the
Downspout Orientations between Architectural IFC Engineer responded to follow the Sanitary IFC Drawings. We would like to raise
and Sanitary IFC Drawings on Roof Platform Level at some concerns of possible overflowing due to limited/congested passage ways MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6108 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3103 Rev.30,
12 Sanitary San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-SN-000012 MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3201 Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3554 Rev.30
San Fernando Station of rainwater.
1. Dimension of Gutter above the Platform-Metal Ceiling - 1088mm Width and
200mm Sidings, clear (See Figure 1).
In reference to RFI - NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-SN-000013, GCR responded

Details of Catch Basin and PVC Pipe Connected to the and confirmed that the pipe connected to catch basin going to the main civil
13 Sanitary San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-SN-000013 Main Civil Drainage Line at San Fernando Station drainage line is “No differences in the pipe size and to follow the IFC drawing MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6012 REV. 30
(See Figure 1).
Referring to IFC Sanitary drawing MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6108_Rev.30 for San

Discrepancy Between the Positions of the Floor Drain Fernando Station Sanitary – Installation Platform Level (see figure 1), the location MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6108 Rev. 30,
14 Sanitary San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-SN-000014 and Hose Bibb in Platform Level at San Fernando of floor drain is in the center of column in Gridline Y1 and Y2 in which the slope MCRP-DWG-SFD-PL-5835 Rev. 30,
Station of floor by 0.5% towards in the track area (see figure 2). MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3421 Rev. B
Referring to IFC Sanitary drawings MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6104_REV.C in San

Fernando Station Sanitary– Installation Ground Level, the drainpipe which is
Confirmation to Retain the Elevator Sump Pump in Lift highlighted in yellow color and connected to elevator sum pump is directly
15 Sanitary San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-SN-000015 1 & 2 at San Fernando Station discharge to the main civil drainage (see figure 1). However, as we review the MCRP-DWG-SFD-SN-6104_REV.C
elevation of elevator pit the drainpipe can also drain/discharge directly by means
of gravity to the main civil drainage line (see figure 2).
77 of 118 836605949.xlsx
(NSCR-EX) Project
General Consultant
2 = Plumbing (PL) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List
Discipline
As per MCRP-DWG-SFD-PL-5841(see figure 1), The schematic diagram for the

Plumbing - Domestic Water Supply Booster Pump domestic water supply booster pumping details is not shown. This information is
1 Plumbing San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-PL-000001 Schematic Diagram essential to have a clear detail for the piping and equipment accessory MCRP-DWG-SFD-PL-5841
arrangement and sizes.
In reference to the response for the RFI NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-SN-000014

in item no.2 shown in Figure 1, “Platform faucet hose bib will be located at the
Confirmation to Maintain the Hose Bibb in Ground and ends of each platform which will be 2nos.per platform”. ADJV would like to MCRP-DWG-SFD-PL-5833 Rev. D,
2 Plumbing San Fernando Station NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-PL-000002 Concourse Level at San Fernando Station MCRP-DWG-SFD-PL-5831 Rev. B
confirm if we will maintain the hose bib as per IFC drawings at Concourse and
Ground Floor Level which shown in highlighted yellow color in Figure 2 and 3.
78 of 118 836605949.xlsx
AREA TYPE (Document Type) DISCIPLINE
Container Name: AREA Container Name: TYPE (Document Type) Min. Characters 1
Min. Characters 3 Min. Characters 3 Max. Characters 2
Max. Characters 6 Max. Characters 3 Abbreviation Definition
Abbreviation Name/Definition Abbreviation Definition A Architectural
SSBP1 Battery Post No. 1 ADM Administration Document AC Accessibility
SSBP2 Battery Post No. 2 BOQ Bill of Quantities AF Automated Fare Collection
SSBP3 Battery Post No. 3 BRF Briefer BM BIM

SSBP4 Battery Post No. 4 CFP Payment Claim CD Contract Documents
CMBDPT Depot - Calamba CMS Comment Sheet CE Civil Engineering
MABDPT Depot - Mabalacat CON Contract CM CMMS
MLDDPT Depot - Malanday, Valenzuela CRF Change Request Form CN Construction
ANG LGU - Angeles DRC Document Review Comments CO Commercial
APL LGU - Apalit DWG Drawings CT Crops and Trees
BAL LGU - Balagtas ENV Environmental Management Document D Designer
BIN LGU - Binan FIN Finance Document DA Official Development Assistance
BOC LGU - Bocaue FRM Forms DC Document Control
CBY LGU - Cabuyao GUI Guidelines DE Depot Equipment
CMB LGU - Calamba HOD Hand Over Document DM Digital Management
CAL LGU - Caloocan HRD Human Resources DS Power Distribution
CLP LGU - Calumpit IPC Interim Payment Certficate E Electrical
CAP LGU - Capas LEG Legal Document EE Escalators and Elevators
GUI LGU - Guiguinto LTR Letter EM E&M
MAB LGU - Mabalacat MAN Manuals EN Environmental Management and Monitoring
MKT LGU - Makati MMO Memorandum FP Fire Protection
MLB LGU - Malabon MOD Model GD Environmental Graphic Design
MAL LGU - Malolos MAR Material Approval Request GN Gender and Development
MNL LGU - Manila MST Method Statement GR GRM
MAR LGU - Marilao MTG Meeting GT Geotechnical Engineering
MEY LGU - Meycauayan PLN Plan H Heritage and Archeology
MIN LGU - Minalin PMT Permit HS Health and Safety
MTN LGU - Muntinlupa PPT Presentation ID Interior Design
PRN LGU - Paranaque PRC Procurement IM Interface Management
CSF LGU - San Fernando PRD Public Relations IP Indigenous Peoples
SPD LGU - San Pedro PRO Procedure IS Informal Settler Family Resettlement
STR LGU - Santa Rosa REQ Statement of Requirements K DOTr
STO LGU - Santo Tomas, Pampanga REV Review LA Landscape Architectural
TAG LGU - Taguig RFI Request for Information LQ Land Acquisition
VAL LGU - Valenzuela ROW Right of Way M Mechanical
BUL Province - Bulacan RPT Report MV Maintenance Vehicles
LGN Province - Laguna SCH Schedule OC OCC/IOCC
PAM Province - Pampanga SMP Sample OM Operations and Maintenance
TLC Province - Tarlac STT Statutory Document OV Overhead Contact System
NCR Region - NCR STY Study PD Platform Screen Doors
REG3 Region - Region III SUP Supplier/Subcontractor Approval PL Plumbing
REG4A Region - Region IV-A TDC Technical Documents PW Power Supply
SSSPB Sectioning Post Banlic TRG Training QA Quality Assurance and Quality Control
SSSPM Sectioning Post Mabalacat TRL Transmittal QS Quantity Surveying
ALASTN Station - Alabang UTL Utilities RD Road Drainage
ANGSTN Station - Angeles WIR Work Inspection Request RS Rolling Stock
APLSTN Station - Apalit S Security
BALSTN Station - Balagtas SA System Assurance
BANSTN Station - Banlic SC Station Interconnection
BCTSTN Station - Bicutan SI Signaling
BINSTN Station - Binan SN Sanitary
BLUSTN Station - Blumentritt ST Structural
BOCSTN Station - Bocaue SU Survey
BCLSTN Station - Bucal T Telecommunications
BUESTN Station - Buendia TI Traffic Impact Assessment
CBYSTN Station - Cabuyao TK Trackworks
CMBSTN Station - Calamba TO Transit Oriented Development
CALSTN Station - Caloocan TR Training
CLPSTN Station - Calumpit TW Temporary Works
CRKSTN Station - Clark UT Utilities
CIASTN Station - Clark International Airport UX UXO
EDSSTN Station - EDSA W Subcontractor
ESPSTN Station - Espana X Contractor
FTISTN Station - FTI Y Specialist Designer
GUISTN Station - Guiguinto Z General (Non-specific discipline)
MABSTN Station - Mabalacat
MLBSTN Station - Malabon
MALSTN Station - Malolos
MLSSTN Station - Malolos South
MARSTN Station - Marilao
MEYSTN Station - Meycauayan
MTNSTN Station - Muntinlupa
NC1STN Station - New Clark City 1
NICSTN Station - Nichols
PCTSTN Station - Pacita
PACSTN Station - Paco
CSFSTN Station - San Fernando
SPDSTN Station - San Pedro
STMSTN Station - Santa Mesa
STRSTN Station - Santa Rosa
STOSTN Station - Santo Tomas
SDLSTN Station - Sindalan
SOLSTN Station - Solis
SCTSTN Station - Sucat
TBISTN Station - Tabing Ilog
TKTSTN Station - Tuktukan
TUTSTN Station - Tutuban
VALSTN Station - Valenzuela
VLPSTN Station - Valenzuela Polo
SSSMD Substation Mabalcat Depot
SSN10 Substation No.10
SSTS1 Substation SS No. 1
SSS01 Substation SS No. S1
SYS System Wide
# Date WIR Received
1 19 November 2024
2 20 November 2024
3 20 November 2024
4 20 November 2024
5 26 November 2024
6 26 November 2024
10 02 December 2024
11 02 December 2024
12 02 December 2024
13 04 December 2024
14 04 December 2024
15 04 December 2024
18 06 December 2024
19 06 December 2024
16 09 December 2024
17 09 December 2024
20 10December 2024
21 11December 2024
22 13December 2024
23 16December 2024
24 16December 2024
25 17December 2024
26 17December 2024
27 17December 2024
28 18December 2024
29 18December 2024
30 18December 2024
31 06 Jan. 2025
32 07 Jan. 2025
33 07 Jan. 2025
WIR N0. & Particular
NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-WIR-CE-025448
Laydown of Crushed Stone & Verifcation of Crushed Stone top level for X18-X19/Y01-Y02 Beam
Pre-pour inspection of lean concrete & verification of LC top level for X18-X19/YO1-YO2 beams
Pouring inspection of LC for X18-X19/Y01-Y02 Beams
Post Pour and As-Built of LC for X18-X19/Y01-Y02 Beams
SFDO steel structure: (H)steel weld, blasting primer, intermediate and top coat,(H) final paint
SFDO steel structure: (H) final paint
LeanConcrete (Ancillary Building) ISER2
SFDO Stn-Compressible Materials
NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-WIR-TW-000645
Application of cement slurry, install wood protection& pvc pipe cover for dowel rebars GL X12-
X13/Y01-Y02
(H) Final Paint Inspection (STRUCTURAL STEEMBRS) prior to delivery X01-X14/Y01-Y02
sfdo steel structure
San fernando foundation
sfdo concrete structure
sfdo concrete structure
sfdo- compressible materials
NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-WIR-A-000003
Inspector received time from
Inspection Date & Time & location Requested
Assigned DC
Date Time Location GCR Engr
20 Nov.2024 13:00 16:35hrs
23 Nov.2024 09:00 San Fernando Stn Zone 1
X18-X19 / Y01-Y02
25 Nov.2024 11:00
26 Nov.2024 09:00
22 Nov.2024 4:45pm
EEI Fabn shop Brgy Sta
maria Bauan Batangas
22 Nov.2024 4:45pm
22 Nov.2024 10:00 4:45pm
27-28 nov.'24 10:00am
27-28 nov.'24
03-06 dec'24 10:00am 4:11pm
02-02 dec'24
EEI Fabn shop Brgy Sta
29 nov'24 10:00 AM
maria Bauan Batangas
BD
BD
BD
BD
BD
BD
BD
BD
Mark Elly
Mark Elly
BD
BD
jestoni
BD
BD
roger
roger
bernard sfdo
elly batangas, eei
elly batangas, eei
elly
elly
bernard
bernard
jestoni
bernard
fy = 36000 ø= 0.9
Ɩ =(inch) g=(inch) Ɩ =(inch) g=(inch) Ɩ =(inch) g=(inch) Ɩ =(inch)
Angles Thickness
5 3 6 4 7 5 8
b(inch)= 1 b(inch)= 1 b(inch)= 1 b(inch)=
5/16 0.31250 øNn = 263.67 øNn = 197.75 øNn = 158.2 øNn =
3/8 0.37500 øNn = 379.69 øNn = 284.77 øNn = 227.81 øNn =
7/16 0.43750 øNn = 516.8 øNn = 387.6 øNn = 310.08 øNn =
1/2 0.50000 øNn = 675 øNn = 506.25 øNn = 405 øNn =
9/16 0.56250 øNn = 854.3 øNn = 640.72 øNn = 512.58 øNn =
5/8 0.62500 øNn = 1054.69 øNn = 791.02 øNn = 632.81 øNn =
Tension Governed by Concrete Failure

øPc = 10.7 le^2*1*sqrt(f'c)
Le Dia f'c øPc (Kips)
100 4 0.625 4000 10.8
115 4.6 0.625 4000 14.3
130 5.2 0.625 4000 18.3
150 6 0.625 4000 24.4
g=(inch)
6
1
131.84
189.84
258.4
337.5
427.15 ≤
527.34
Nu Nu ≤ øNn
g Nu ≤ øPc
Hilti Tension Capacity &
Tension Govern by
Concrete Failure w/c
ever is greater
Fullcrum e
FBD
CMU 5" Laying & Plastered Finish
qty Unit U/P

5" chb 350.00 m2 1,370.00 479,500.00 6,147.44
substruc 2,650.00
beams capping 920.00
roof sheet 495.00
roof struture 1,700.00 78 132,600.00
doors 641.03
wdws 530.00
electrical 650.00
plumbing 550.00
tiles 350.00
ceiling
14,633.46 78 1,141,410.00
Non Bearing Wall/Panel
Shld be designed and installed so that they Do Not Restrain Frames from Lateral Translation
If restrain occurs, Panels may tend to act as Shear Walls and become overstressed
Panels / Walls installed on a frame - to be connected in a manner to Allow Frame Distortion
Elastic Deformation
A material's temporary change in shape that returns to its original state when the applied stress
is removed. This happens when the stress is proportional to the strain, and the deformation is
rate independent.
Hooks Law
Plastic Deformation
A material's permanent distortion that occurs when the applied stress exceeds the material's
yield strength. This happens when the material undergoes tensile, compressive, bending, or
torsion stresses
ateral Translation
stressed
Frame Distortion
n the applied stress

the deformation is
ds the material's
sive, bending, or
GS115
GS 120
GS 120.6
Structure: SAN FERNANDO STATION
Loc'n: KM 58+600
Date Activity # Workers
19-Nov
20-Nov
21-Nov
22-Nov
23-Nov
24-Nov Saturday
25-Nov Sunday
26-Nov
27-Nov Zone1
1. Foundation beam rebar installation
2. Post pour concrete repair works
Zone 4
1. Rebar installation x15-x16/y2
2. Formworks installation x14-x15/y1
Zone 5
1. Concrete casting x4-x5 (first lift)
2. Rebar installation x6-x7
List & No. of Equipment Weather Condition
sunny 24-hours good weather

Fair 24-hours good weather

-
X-01
X-02
X-03
X-04
X-05
X-06
X-07
X-08
Layers
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
OUTER 3
LAYER 2
1
1
Y-02
2
3
4
INNER 5
CELLS 6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Y-01 20
21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
X-09
X-10
X-11
X-12
X-13
X-14
X-15
X-16
DS
NS
DS
NS
25-Nov
29-Nov 4:51am 26-Nov
26-Nov
26-Nov
26-Nov
27-Nov
27-Nov
27-Nov
25-Nov 27-Nov 23:24
27-Nov 27-Nov
28-Nov 28-Nov
23:56 28-Nov 23:56 28-Nov
5:12am 29-Nov 5:12am 29-Nov

X-17
X-18
X-19
DS
NS
FDT FDT
27-Nov
27-Nov
26-Nov
26-Nov
NSCR-GCR-N02-CSFSTN-DRC-ST
Structure: Intermediate Signalling House-2
Loc'n: bet km 64+610 - km 64+650
Date Activity No. of Workers
19-Nov
20-Nov
21-Nov
22-Nov
23-Nov
24-Nov Saturday
25-Nov Sunday
26-Nov rebar installation of foundation girder along GL X01-X04/Y01 7
27-Nov rebar installation of foundation girder along GL X01-X04/Y02 7
28-Nov ISER2-rebar installation of foundation girder along GL X01-X04/Y01 ISER2-7pax
List & No. of Equipment
SS14-installation of timber supports for beam and slab soffit.
SS14-10pax
d slab soffit.
-
Structure: Signalling, Communication Building, Genset Housing
Location: Next to San Fernando Station
Current Status
Date Activity # Wrkers # Equipment
18-Nov
19-Nov 45 BP for
20-Nov SIG/COM building
21-Nov Completed.
22-Nov 4 BP for Genset
23-Nov House not yet-
24-Nov ROW issue
25-Nov
26-Nov No Activity
27-Nov No Activity
28-Nov
Structure:
Loc'n:
19-Nov
20-Nov
21-Nov
22-Nov
23-Nov
24-Nov Saturday
25-Nov Sunday
26-Nov installation of timber supports for beam and slab soffit. 12
List & No. of Equipment
-
Structure: SUB-STATION 17
Location: Between km 66+620 & km 66+660
Date Activity No. of Workers List & No. of Equipment
19-Nov No Activity
20-Nov No Activity
21-Nov No Activity
22-Nov No Activity
23-Nov No Activity
24-Nov Saturday
25-Nov Sunday
26-Nov No Activity
27-Nov No Activity
Reply/Commens from Contractor Current Status/ Progress
from Joven Rivera from Regie M. Guinto
on SS17, we'll start the

blockworks soon/this week and
presently checking temporary wp Wala pa po materyales
(using masterseal 620) on roof sir,kaya yung mga tao
slab. and for the NCR, preparing nasa SS14 muna.
for alphatec hoping to apply by
next week. fyi.
Roof Slab already casted
-
Structure: SUBSTATION-15
Loc'n: KM (P-577 & P-578)
19-Nov No Activity- ROW issue
24-Nov Saturday
25-Nov Sunday
Status
Never Started -
Structure: SUBSTATION 16
Loc'n: BET. KM 61+950 & KM 61+990
19-Nov No Activity- ROW Issue
24-Nov Saturday
25-Nov Sunday
Status
Never started -
Structure: Intermediate Signalling House-3
Loc'n: bet km 64+610 - km 64+650
19-Nov
20-Nov
21-Nov
22-Nov
23-Nov No Activity - ROW issue
24-Nov Saturday
25-Nov Sunday
List & No. of Equipment Status
Work never
Started
-

Wir

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Wir

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Wir

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

North - South Commuter Railway Extension

No. Discipline & Code Subtotal

2 Civil Engineering (CE) 14

4 Geotechnical Engineering (GT) 1

5 Structural (ST) 802

8 Fire Protection (FP) 9

91 = Architectural (A) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List

Kindly refer to the attached drawings

1. Please confirm allocation of Trench Drain on Ramp – TD shows on

In reference to MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3431_Rev.D San Fernando Station Reflected

As per MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3701, MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3501, MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-

91 = Architectural (A) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List

91 = Architectural (A) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List

In reference to material finish Insitu Terazzo; We would like to request further

As per IFC Architectural Drawings MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3403 Rev.30, MCRP-DWG- MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501 Rev.30,

Upon reviewing the IFC Architectural Drawing MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3453 Rev.30

As we review the replied RFI with reference number NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-

Upon reviewing the IFC Architectural Drawings (Figure 1) MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-

As we have noticed on the provided Illustration of Track-to-Track Bond, there

Upon reviewing the IFC Architectural Drawings MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3405 rev.31,

According to drawing reference MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404_[E] San Fernando

91 = Architectural (A) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List

Upon reviewing the IFC Architectural Drawings (Figure 1) MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-

As commented on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000034 Rev.A (See Figure 1), to

We would like to clarify the Detail of W02 – Wall Finishes

Upon reviewing the IFC Architectural Drawings (Figure 1.a) MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-

In reference to RFI, NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000039 Confirmation of GFRC

We would like to clarify the response on the NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-

As commented on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000042 Paint Finishes at MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3103 Rev.31, MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3601 Rev.31,

91 = Architectural (A) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List

Upon reviewing the IFC Drawings (Figure 1) MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404 Rev.31

As commented on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000045 Rev.B, outdoor

In reference to the given Concourse Level Ceiling Faming Plan on MCRP-DWG-

Upon reviewing the co-relation of Building and Maintenance Road Alignment, we

91 = Architectural (A) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List

Upon reviewing the co-relation of Building and Maintenance Road, we have

As commented on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000056 Rev.A, item IV (See

Upon reviewing the IFC Architectural Drawings MCRP-DWG-BP-AR-3104 Rev.B,

As responded on the NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000058 Rev.A (See Figure 1)

As indicated on Detailed Plan, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3405_Rev.32, AFC Room, MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3405_Rev.32, MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3501_Rev.31,

We would like to request for clarification on the water repellent application

91 = Architectural (A) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List

We would like to request for further clarification in reference to NSCR-ADJV-

According to MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3052_Rev.D San Fernando Station Fire

In reference to MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3641_Rev.30 and MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-

We would like to clarify the comments stated on NSCR-GCR-N02-CSFSTN-DRC-ST-

In reference to MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3021_Rev.D versus MCRP-DWG-SFD-DR-

According to architectural MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3571_[B] and DRC comments

91 = Architectural (A) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List

In reference to Architectural IFC MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3571_[B] General Station

As commented on NSCR-ADJV-N02-CSFSTN-RFI-A-000074 Clarification on

In reference to MCRP-DWG-PSS-AR-3501_[D] General Substation Details and

According to architectural IFC drawing MCRP-DWG-STA-AR-3531_[B] and MCRP-

Referring to IFC drawing MCRP-DWG-SFD-AR-3404_[F] San Fernado Station

91 = Architectural (A) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List

We would like to request for clarification on ISER 2 and 3 wall surface

In reference to architectural coordiantion meeting no.14 dated last april 19;

As we are progressing the Combined Services Layout, we have noticed some

We would like to clarify regarding the application coverage of the Semi-

14 = Civil Engineering (CE) CP N-02 Request For Information Master List