Enneagram Benchmark Report 2011
Enneagram Benchmark Report 2011
Enneagram Benchmark Report 2011
July 2011
In This Report... Overview
Companies
Best Practices
Applications
Surprises
Trends
EIBN
1 1 2 3 3 4 4
ENNEAGRAM IN BUSINESS
Benchmark Team
Matt Ahrens (US) Lindy Amos (Australia) Valerie Atkin (US) Gema de la Rosa (Spain) Neil Harper (South Africa) Martin Hawkes (Ireland) Gloria Hung (China) Ginger Lapid-Bogda (US) Bo Zoffman (Denmark)
what 39 experts say is critical to the success of a productive and sustainable enneagram-based organizational change
and psychological or esoteric jargon, focuses on development and potential, and embraces a respect for differences.
Success Factor 4 Highest quality: consultants, workshops, and change interventions (56%)
Quality is essential in the facilitator or consultant chosen, the workshops offered, and the change activities that are implemented. Consultants must be knowledgeable about both the Enneagram and organizational change processes; provide stimulating, interactive workshops; present information in a non-judgmental, insightful, and accurate way; and encourage participation, being responsive to all concerns and questions. Workshops, programs, and interventions must be innovative, adapted to the needs and culture of the organization, and conducted in a learning environment of safety, excitement, and fun.
There is a huge unmet need at work and at home. At work, the need involves creativity, empathy, and flexibility and being less hierarchical and more networked. At home, theres more stress, huge demands, and increasing complexity. The Enneagram helps with all of this.
The consultants depth of experience and expertise is essential to the credibility of the Enneagram and the linkage to organizational needs.
CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS 82% of the experts agreed that focus on real needs was the single most important critical success factor. There was also strong agreement about the next four factors: leadership, typing, quality, and integration. This was consistent in every industry, every country, and whether the interviewee was a consultant or a leader. The nal factor, cultural readiness, while important, was not as critical as the other ve factors.
Without sufficient readiness, employees would fear the Enneagram could be used as a weapon.
39
26
13
82%
Needs
69%
Leadership
66%
Typing
56%
Quality
54%
Integration
33%
Readiness
both. The focus includes enhancing team behavior at the individual and team level (including team dynamics); creating highperforming and self-organizing teams; eliminating team dysfunction; and team mergers. Programs vary from day-long sessions to 1+ years.
reduce their type based decision-making biases, it occurs most often in leadership and team development programs.
Application 1: Communication
Communication applications include the following: increased understanding of differences in communication style; minimizing Enneagram-based communication distortions and misperceptions; and enhancing interactions between people of the 9 types. These are done through on-going programs, workshops, Enneagram type panels, and 1-1 coaching.
Application Area
1. Communication 2. Leadership 3. Teams 4. EQ 5. Coaching 6. Conict 7. Feedback 8. Decision Making 9. Sales 10. Negotiations
Companies using this application 49/72 44/72 41/72 36/72 35/72 33/72 31/72 18/72 13/72 12/72
Application 2: Leadership
Leadership development applications include organization-wide leadership development programs; competency-based leadership learning communities; individual coaching; and development programs for target groups i.e., high potentials and women. Many of these monthly, weeklong, or series of one-day workshops are designed for specic needs: to create greater leadership bench strength; to instill a culture of development; and to reduce reliance of hierarchy, competition and control, while increasing collaboration and innovation.
Application 5: Coaching
In-person or by phone, formally and informally, Enneagram coaching is being used for talent and performance management, leadership development, EQ, and more. In addition, some companies train managers to coach their employees using the Enneagram.
Application 6: Conict
Whether in family businesses, law rms, corporations, or non-prots and governments, using the Enneagram to reduce conict depersonalizes the issues, making them far easier to resolve. This application occurs between the conicting parties, as stand-alone training programs, or within teams.
Application 3: Teams
These teams include executive level, management teams, and intact work teams that meet in-person, virtually, or a combination of Other systems have value, but they dont help with self-mastery; they assess where you are, but dont show you how to develop or become more integrated.
Application 7: Feedback
This application is usually combined with other training topics (i.e., communication, conict, leadership) or taught by itself to employees as well as leaders.
The data showed that while no single enneagram-business application is being used by every company, most organizations are using at least 4-5, with some using as many as 13.
Surprises!
what we didnt know for sure, but do now
Surprise 1: PROFOUND RESULTS
Companies are reporting powerful increases in employee engagement, communication, positive interactions, and collaboration between individuals, within teams, and across business units. The results are both local and systemwide. On quantitative measures, teams, business units, and companies are scoring signicantly higher on multiple measures on company surveys, including customer satisfaction. On nancial measures, business units are showing gains in nancial results; sales are rising by double digits; companies are retaining key leaders; and in one company, increased trust and communication saved a $1m. error.
On the professional level, leaders are scoring higher on 360 surveys, and there are multiple instances where leaders using the Enneagram for their development have been promoted 2-3 levels higher within very short time periods.
Innovation
Innovators (2.5%) Early Adopters (13.5%) Early Majority (34%) Late Majority (34%) Laggards (16%)
Innovators are organizations that are forward-looking, risk-takers who employ innovative approaches without needing the reassurance of others: early adopters ask who else is doing this and take the risk once companies they admire have done it rst; early majority includes organizations that dont want to be left behind; late majority organizations do something only after it has been tried and proven; and laggards are organizations that may never come onboard. To utilize innovation to increase market share, organizations need to be among the rst 50% of adopters (by early majority). This model, Diffusion of Innovations, was developed in 1962 by Everett M. Rogers.
RESULTS: Tangible results occur within 6 months, but sustainable results take a year or longer. Its like going to the gym. At first, you feel tired but better. After a while, you feel much better, then think you dont need to go anymore. However, you have to use it regularly to experience its full contribution. The longer you use the Enneagram, the more benefits; it becomes 2nd nature to you and the organization.
EIBN Benchmark Team Matt Ahrens (United States) matt@themattahrensgroup.com Lindy Amos (Australia) lindy@collectivepossibilities.com.au Valerie Atkin (United States) valerie@wellsstreet.com Gema de la Rosa (Spain) gema@maybeinternational.com Neil Harper (South Africa) neil.harper@purposeinc.me Martin Hawkes (Ireland) mhawkes2@gmail.com Gloria Hung (China) gloriah_hk@yahoo.com Ginger Lapid-Bogda (United States) ginger@theenneagraminbusiness.com Bo Zoffman (Denmark) bzj@ps4.dk 2011 The Enneagram in Business Network