Ge6757 Unit-5
Ge6757 Unit-5
Ge6757 Unit-5
QUALITY SYSTEMS
INTRODUCTION
ISO 9001:2000, Quality management This is the requirement standard you use to
systems - Requirements assess your ability to meet customer and
applicable regulatory requirements and
thereby address customer satisfaction.
It is now the only standard in the ISO 9000
family against which third-party certification
can be carried.
This guideline standard provides guidance
ISO 9004:2000, Quality management
for continual improvement of your quality
systems - Guidelines for performance
management system to benefit all parties
improvements
through sustained customer satisfaction.
ISO 19011, Guidelines on Quality and/or Provides you with guidelines for verifying
Environmental Management Systems the system's ability to achieve defined
Auditing (currently under development) quality objectives. You can use this
standard internally or for auditing your
suppliers.
ISO 10006:1997, Quality management - Guidelines to help you ensure the quality of
Guidelines to quality in project both the project processes and the project
management products.
Gives you guidelines to ensure that a
ISO 10007:1995, Quality management - complex product continues to function
Guidelines for configuration management when components are changed
individually.
ISO/DIS 10012, Quality assurance Give you guidelines on the main features
requirements for measuring equipment - of a calibration system to ensure that
Part 1: Metrological confirmation system measurements are made with the
for measuring equipment intended accuracy.
• New business
o Are you getting ISO 9000 inquiries from the companies
you sell to?
o Are there other companies you could do business with, if
you gained ISO 9000 certification?
o Do you do business with any government agencies?
Would that represent a new source of business for you in
the future?
How can a company determine whether it
will benefit from ISO 9000 certification?
• Quality
• Is quality an integral part of your entire
organization, across all functions?
• Is your company's reputation based on quality?
Is that one of the important selling points in the
industry in which you compete?
• Do you want to give your existing quality
assurance program a platform to improve
quality?
• Most importantly, do you see quality as a
competitive edge that could help you accomplish
your organization's goals in the 90s?
• If you answered "yes" to several of these
questions, your organization may benefit from
ISO 9000 certification.
FACTS
• ITC Hotel Maurya Sheraton was the first hotel
in India to get ISO 14001. ...
• IndiaMART becomes the first ISO
Certified Dotcom Company
Can I quantify exactly what it will be
worth?
• Unlike many TQM initiatives or general quality improvements,
the benefits of ISO 9000 certification have been studied and
quantified.
• In a September 1991 study for the British government, Survey of
Quality Consultancy Scheme Clients 1988-90, researchers
(Pera International and Salford University Business Service Ltd.)
contacted over 2300 firms. The survey of registered companies
found that:
o 89% reported greater operational efficiency
o 48% reported increased profitability
o 76% reported improvement in marketing
o 26% reported increased export sales
Can it give a competitive edge?
• You can use ISO 9000 certification to
gain or maintain approved vendor
status, even when companies reduce
the number of their suppliers.
• You can enter new and lucrative
markets that were previously closed to
you.
Can it give a competitive edge?
BACKGROUND
Originally the company had seven divisions (organised by product) and each
division had its own sales order function. It had recently centralised the sales
order functions - in a structural sense - but the people who worked within
product divisions still processed orders for the same products. The primary
change with centralisation was standardisation of working procedures.
•It was also felt that the company might achieve some benefits from clarity of
working procedures.
•The standard procedures meant that people wouldn't get things wrong. The
organisation viewed salespeople as needing to be controlled - "They won't be
able to get away with giving administrators inadequate information and what
they provide has to be written down".
There had been a cultural tradition of sales being 'heroes', they had
treated 'back office' staff work as drudgery, they were always
seeking last-minute changes and rarely were accurate with their
form-filling.
• It was argued that product returned within fifteen days would be likely not to
have been subjected to adverse conditions. The procedure for returned product
required the warehouse supervisor to check date of receipt against date of
despatch and, where it fitted the new rule, to send a list of returned product to a
director for signature. Signatories were hard to find. When they were available,
they were not inclined to think of signing forms from the warehouse as their top
priority.
•But no-one asked: Why do we have product being returned? - with a view to
eradicating it.
•Have we ever had a problem with product being returned and then sent out
as another order? The answer, when asked, was no.
•If they had viewed their organisation as a system, they would have known
that returned product had not shown signs of fault and would have taken the
view that customers' receiving faulty goods would have been an unlikely
occurrence. In the unlikely event of a customer receiving faulty goods, the
organisation could respond by engaging in excellent 'repair'. A good way to
show customers what matters to you.
•Their view now, is that ISO 9000 is the foundation for other things to happen.
They felt that without it, they would have been unable to get a company-wide
focus for the quality effort.
•The managers argued that ISO 9000 registration produced benefits. Processes
were more clearly defined and that resulted in less waste or more efficiency.
They had recognised and sought to avoid unnecessary bureaucracy, and even
went a further step away from the norm by getting rid of procedures, using flow-
charts to provide clarity of focus.
•The extent to which ISO 9000 can or will improve economic performance will
depend on features of the Standard (and their interpretation) and features of the
company's current culture
CONCLUSION
The three most important benefits of ISO 9000 were seen as better
management control, greater awareness of procedural problems and
promotional value.
•Those most satisfied with the impact of ISO 9000 on their organisations
had sought the Standard for better management control and improved
customer service.
General
• Needs to demonstrate consistency
• Aims to enhance Customer Satisfaction
Application
• Generic and intended to be applicable to all
Organizations, Type, Size and Product
• Requirements that are not applicable can be
considered for exclusion
THE FOUR ABSOLUTES OF
QUALITY
1. QUALITY IS CONFORMANCE TO
REQUIREMENTS
Do What you said you would do
2. THE SYSTEM FOR PRODUCING QUALITY IS
PREVENTION NOT APPRAISAL
Solve Problems permanently
3. THE PERFORMANCE STANDARD IS ZERO
DEFECTS
Right First Time and Every Time
4. QUALITY IS MEASURED BY THE COST OF NON-
CONFORMANCE
Repair / Rework is paid for out of Profits
QUALITY CONTROL –
QUALITY ASSURANCE
• Quality Control is REACTIVE whereas
Quality Assurance is PROACTIVE
• Quality Control deals with DETECTION
Quality Assurance deals with PREVENTION
i.e. All the planned and systematic actions
necessary to prevent problems and ensure
confidence that the product will satisfy the
requirements for quality
QUALITY ASSESSMENT
AUDIT EVIDENCE
Objectives
• Determination of Compliance with specified
Requirements
• Identification of Weakness
• Management Tool for Improvement
• Totally Independent
• International / National Standards
• Qualified or Registered Assessors
• Timing / Timescales very important
• Team Leader only Recommends
CONDUCT OF THE AUDIT
• Customer requirements
• Quality system requirements
– Manuals
– Procedures / work instructions
• Quality standard
• Legal requirements – statutory,
regulatory or industry body
• Regulations of registration body
AUDIT PROGRAMME
RESPONSIBILITIES
Those assigned the responsibility for managing
the audit programme should
• Establish the objective and extent of the audit
programme
• Establish the responsibilities and procedures,
and ensure resources are provided
• Ensure the implementation of the audit
programme
• Ensure that appropriate audit programme
records are maintained, and
• Monitor, review and improve the audit
AUDIT PROGRAMME
RESOURCES
When identifying resources for the audit
programme, consideration should be
given to
• Financial resources necessary to
develop, implement, manage and
improve audit activities
• Audit techniques
Cont…
AUDIT PROGRAMME
RESOURCES
• Process to achieve and maintain the
competence of auditors, and to improve
auditor performance
• The availability of auditors and technical
experts having competence appropriate to
the particular audit programme objectives
• The extent of the audit programme and
• Travelling time, accommodation and other
auditing needs
AUDIT PROGRAMME
PROCEDURES
Audit programme procedures should
address the following
• Planning and scheduling audits
• Assuring the competence of auditors
and audit team leaders
• Selecting appropriate audit teams and
assigning their roles and responsibilities
Cont…
AUDIT PROGRAMME
PROCEDURES
• Conducting audits
• Conducting audit follow-up, if applicable
• Maintaining audit programme records
• Monitoring the performance and
effectiveness of the audit programme
• Reporting to top management on the
overall achievements of the audit
programme
AUDIT PROGRAMME
IMPLEMENTATION
The implementation of an audit programme
should address the following:
• Communicating the audit programme to
relevant parties
• Coordinating and scheduling audits and other
activities relevant to the audit programme
• Establishing and maintaining a process for
the evaluation of the auditors and their
continual professional development
Cont…
AUDIT PROGRAMME
IMPLEMENTATION
• Ensuring the selection of audit teams
• Providing necessary resources to the audit
teams
• Ensuring the conduct of audits according to
the audit programme
• Ensuring the control of records of the audit
activities
• Ensuring review and approval of the audit
reports, and ensuring their distribution to the
audit client and other specified parties
• Ensuring audit follow-up, if applicable
AUDIT PROGRAMME RECORDS
Cont…
AUDITOR ATTRIBUTES
Local Requirements
• Culture
• Practices
• Approach
Cont…
AUDITOR ATTRIBUTES
• Diplomatic • Decisive
• Perceptive • Ethical
AUDITORS RESPONSIBILITIES
Tell me:
• Who (does it)
• What (is done)
• Where (is it done)
• Why (is it done)
• When (does it get done)
• How (is it done; often is it done)
• Show me
THE AUDIT CYCLE
PREPARATIONS
Documentation Review
Preliminary visit
Audit Planning
PERFORMANCE
Opening Meeting
Gathering Information
Cont…
THE AUDIT CYCLE
Team Meetings
Non-Conformity Reporting
Closing Meeting
FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS
Audit Report
Corrective Action Verification
Surveillance
THE OPENING MEETING
• Introductions
• Confirm Standard, Scope and Audit Authority
• Confirm Audit Plan and Other arrangements
• Outline Audit Method
• Confirm Guides and their Authority
• Confirm Confidentiality
• Staff / Employee Issues
• Any Relevant Questions
• Close Meeting
TEAM MEETINGS
• Discuss the Findings of Team
• Team Leader Agrefs:
– Non-Conformities
– Wording
– Categorization
• Resolve any Issues
• Identify any modifications to the programme as a
result of the findings to Date
OBJECTIVE
Ensure that the Team presents a unified
response at the wash-up meeting
WASH-UP MEETINGS
• Disclaimer
• Confirm Confidentiality
• Recommendations
• Questions Answered
• Close Meeting
RECOMMENDATIONS
• Deferred Registration
Close out or Down rate all outstanding Major
/ Hold point Non-Conformities. Clear as
many Minor / On-Going improvements as
possible
• Recommendations
• Conclusions
• Distribution
NOTE TAKING
Cont…
NOTE TAKING
Cont…
NONCONFORMITY
Cont…
NONCONFORMITY
• Make it retrievable
• Make it helpful
• Make it concise
CONSIDER THE SERIOUSNESS
NOTE
CERTIFICATION BODIES DO NOT
ACCREDITATE SUPPLIERS
ACCREDITATION
NOTE
Most people assume Accreditation and
Certification to be the same thing – they
are not
A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH TO
QUALITY AUDITING
SELECT
(1)
(1) A Process or an
element of Q. system
No
DOCUMENTED?
Repeat
cycle as (2) 1st check only
necessary
DOC’N No
SATISFACTORY?
(2)
RAISE
NC FORM
COMPLETE?
Yes
END
NCR CORRECTIVE ACTION CYCLE
NCR IDENTIFIED 3rd PARTY AUDIT
NCR ISSUED
PROBLEM INVESTIGATED
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLANNED
CORRECTIVE ACTION
IMPLEMENTED
CORRECTIVE ACTION
VERIFIED BY AUDIT
NO
YES
NOTIFY
CERTIFICATION BODY
YES
NO
OK NCR ISSUED