0% found this document useful (0 votes)
395 views80 pages

2 Hamilton

1) The Hamiltonian formalism provides an alternative description of classical mechanics using conjugate momenta rather than generalized velocities. It describes dynamics in a 2M-dimensional phase space rather than configuration space. 2) The Hamiltonian is defined as H = Σpmqṁ - L, where pm are the conjugate momenta. Hamilton's equations are qṁ = ∂H/∂pm and pṁ = - ∂H/∂qm. 3) For closed systems with no external forces, if the Lagrangian does not depend explicitly on time then H represents the total mechanical energy, which is conserved. Otherwise H may depend on time and not represent a physical observable.

Uploaded by

Rajesh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
395 views80 pages

2 Hamilton

1) The Hamiltonian formalism provides an alternative description of classical mechanics using conjugate momenta rather than generalized velocities. It describes dynamics in a 2M-dimensional phase space rather than configuration space. 2) The Hamiltonian is defined as H = Σpmqṁ - L, where pm are the conjugate momenta. Hamilton's equations are qṁ = ∂H/∂pm and pṁ = - ∂H/∂qm. 3) For closed systems with no external forces, if the Lagrangian does not depend explicitly on time then H represents the total mechanical energy, which is conserved. Otherwise H may depend on time and not represent a physical observable.

Uploaded by

Rajesh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 80

Hamiltonian Formalism

f
Legendre transformations u
x
f f
f ( x, y ) df  dx  dy  udx  vdy f
x y v
y
g  f  ux dg  df  udx  xdu  udx  vdy  udx  xdu
g
v
g g y
dg  vdy  xdu  dy  du g ( y, u )
y u g
x
• Legendre transformation: u

g ( y, u )  f ( x, y )  ux
g g
v ;x  
y u Adrien-Marie
Legendre
(1752 –1833)
g ( y, u )  f ( x, y )  ux
What is H?
g g
M
L v ;x  
H  qm  L y u
m 1 qm
L
• Conjugate momentum  pm
q m
• Then
M
 H  L(q1 ,..., qM , q1 ,..., q M , t )   pm q m
m 1
• So
H (q1 ,..., qM , p1 ,..., pM , t )
M
  L(q1 ,..., qM , q1 ,..., q M , t )   pm q m
m 1
L
What is H?  pm
M q m
H   L   pm q m
m 1
M   L
M
 
dH  dL  d   pm q m     
L
 dqm  dqm 
 m1  m1  qm qm 
L M
 dt    pm dq m  q m dpm 
t m 1

M
L
   p m dqm  q m dpm   dt
L d  L  t
   m 1

qm dt  qm 
  pm   p m
d
dt
What is H?
M
L
dH    p m dqm  q m dpm   dt
m 1 t

H H H L dH
  p m  q m  
qm pm t t dt

dH  H
M
H  H
   qm  p m  
dt m1  qm pm  t
M
H dH H
   p m q m  q m p m   
m 1 t dt t
What is H?
• If L  L0 (q1 , q2 ,..., qM , t )   l1i (q1 , q2 ,..., qM , t )qi
i

  l2ij (q1 , q2 ,..., qM , t )qi q j  L0  L1  L2


i, j

• Then H  L2  L0
1 
T   mi ri  2
• Kinetic energy
i 2  
• In generalized coordinates ri  ri (q1 , q2 ,..., qM , t )
  2
1  ri ri 
T   mi  q j 
i 2
 t q 
 j j 
What is H?
   
2
 2
1  ri ri 
T   mi  q j   mi  i 
 
1 r
 t  
i 2  j q j  i 2  t 
       
 r r 1  r  r
    mi i
 q j     mi
i i
 i q j q k

j  i q  t  2  q  q 
j  j ,k  i j k 
• For scleronomous generalized coordinates
 
ri  ri (q1 , q2 ,..., qM )
   
1  ri ri 
T    mi  q j q k  L2
2 j ,k  i q j qk 
• Then H  L2  L0  T  L0
• If V   L0 H  T  V  Emec
What is H?
L  L0  L1  L2
• For scleronomous generalized coordinates, H is a
total mechanical energy of the system (even if H
depends explicitly on time)

• If H does not depend explicitly on time, it is a


constant of motion (even if is not a total mechanical
energy)

• In all other cases, H is neither a total mechanical


energy, nor a constant of motion
Hamilton’s equations
M
• Hamiltonian: H (q1 ,..., qM , p1 ,..., pM , t )   pm q m
m 1

 L(q1 ,..., qM , q1 ,..., q M , t )


• Hamilton’s equations of motion:

H H H L
q m  p m   
pm qm t t

Sir William Rowan


Hamilton
(1805 – 1865)
Hamiltonian formalism
• For a system with M degrees of freedom, we have
2M independent variables q and p: 2M-dimensional
phase space (vs. configuration space in Lagrangian
formalism)

• Instead of M second-order differential equations in


the Lagrangian formalism we work with 2M first-order
differential equations in the Hamiltonian formalism

• Hamiltonian approach works best for closed


holonomic systems

• Hamiltonian approach is particularly useful in


quantum mechanics, statistical physics, nonlinear
physics, perturbation theory
Hamiltonian formalism for open
systems
d  L  L
  Qj
dt  q j  q
 j

dp j L
  Qj
dt q j

H H
q m  p m    Qm
pm qm
Hamilton’s equations in symplectic
notation
• Construct a column matrix (vector) with 2M
elements
 j  q j ; M  j  p j
• Then
 H  H  H  H
   ;   
 η  j q j  η  M  j p j
• Construct a 2Mx2M square matrix as follows:
1 0 ... 0 0 0 ... 0
 0 1 0 1 ... 0  0 0 ... 0 
J  1  0
  1 0  ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
   
0 0 ... 1 0 0 ... 0
Hamilton’s equations in symplectic
notation
• Then the equations of motion will look compact in
the symplectic (matrix) notation:

H
η  J
η
• Example (M = 2):
 q1   0 0 1 0  H / q1 
 q   0 0  
0 1  H / q 
 2  2

 p1   1 0 0 0  H / p1 
    
 p 2   0  1 0 0 H / p2 
Lagrangian to Hamiltonian
• Obtain conjugate momenta from a Lagrangian
L
pm 
q m
• Write a Hamiltonian
M
H   L   pm q m
m 1

• Obtain qm  qm (q1 ,..., qM , p1 ,..., pM , t ) from

• Plug qm  qm (q1 ,..., qM , p1 ,..., pM , t ) into the


Hamiltonian to make it a function of coordinates,
momenta, and time
Lagrangian to Hamiltonian bmn  bnm
• For a Lagrangian quadratic in generalized velocities
L(q1 ,..., qM , q1 ,..., q M , t )  L0 (q1 ,..., qM , t )
  am (q1 ,..., qM , t )q m   bmn (q1 ,..., qM , t )q m q n
m m,n
~ 1~
• Write a symplectic notation: L  L0  q  a  q bq
~ 2
• Then a Hamiltonian H  q p  L
~ ~ 1~ ~ 1~
 q p  L0  q a  q bq  q (p  a)  L0  q bq
2 2
• Conjugate momenta
L   ~ 1~ 
p  ~  ~  L0  q a  q bq   a  bq
q q  2 
Lagrangian to Hamiltonian

p  a  bq
• Inverting this equation
~ ~ 1 ~
p  a  bq 1
b (p  a)  q (p  a )b  q
~ 1 ~
• Then a Hamiltonian H  q (p  a)  L0  q bq
2
~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ 1 1
 (p  a )b (p  a)  L0  (p  a )b bb (p  a)
2
1 ~ ~ 1
H  (p  a )b (p  a)  L0
2
Example: electromagnetism
 
m(r  r )  
L  q  q(r  A)
2
 
L p j  qAj  p  qA
pj   mrj  qAj rj  r
rj m m
 
H  pr  L
    2  
 p  qA m  p  qA   p  qA  
H  p     q  q  A 
m 2  m   m



Example: electromagnetism
    2  
 p  qA m  p  qA   p  qA  
H  p     q  q  A 
m 2  m   m



         
p  p  qp  A p  p  2qp  A  q 2 A  A
   q
m 2m
   
p  A  qA  A
q
  m       
2 p  p p  p  q2 A  A 2qp  A  2q 2 A  A
   q 
2m  2m  2m
  
p  p q A A 2qp  A
 2

2

   q  p  qA
2m 2m 2m H  q
2m
Hamilton’s equations from the
variational principle
• Action functional :
t2

I   L(q1 ,..., qM , q1 ,..., q M , t )dt


t1

M 
t2

    pm q m  H (q1 ,..., qM , p1 ,..., pM , t ) dt


t1  m 1 
• Variations in the phase space :

qm (t ,  )  qm 0 (t )  m (t )  m (t1 )   m (t2 )  0


pm (t ,  )  pm 0 (t )   m (t )  m (t1 )   m (t2 )  0
Hamilton’s equations from the
variational principle
 dpm dH 
t2
dI M
dq m
  q m  pm  dt
d t1  m1 d d d 
 H H 
t2 M

    m q m   m pm  m   m dt
t1 m 1 
qm pm 
• Integrating by parts
 H H 
t2 M M
    m q m   m p m  m   m dt    m pm t
t2

t1 m 1  q m  p m  m 1
1

t2 M
  H    H  
     q m   m   p m    m dt

t1 m 1  
p m    q m  
Hamilton’s equations from the
variational principle

dI
t2 M
 H    H  
     q m   m   p m    m dt  0

d t1 m 1   pm   q m  

• For arbitrary independent variations

H H
q m  ; p m  
pm qm
Conservation laws

H H dH H
p m   ; q m  ; 
qm pm dt t

• If a Hamiltonian does not depend on a certain


coordinate explicitly (cyclic), the corresponding
conjugate momentum is a constant of motion

• If a Hamiltonian does not depend on a certain


conjugate momentum explicitly (cyclic), the
corresponding coordinate is a constant of motion

• If a Hamiltonian does not depend on time explicitly,


this Hamiltonian is a constant of motion
Higher-derivative Lagrangians
  i ηm ( xn )  i  0,1,2,3... ?
• Let us recall: L  , x 
 x i n  x  x, y, z , t ,... ?
 n  n

 L dxdydz  L d rm (ti
) / dt , t 
i rm  rx , ry , rz

• Lagrangians with i > 1 occur in many systems and


theories:
1. Non-relativistic classical radiating charged particle
(see Jackson)
2. Dirac’s relativistic generalization of that
3. Nonlinear dynamics
4. Cosmology
5. String theory
6. Etc.
Higher-derivative Lagrangians
• For simplicity, consider a 1D case:
L  L( x, x, x, x,...)
• Variation x(t ,  )  x0 (t )  (t )
 L L L L
t2 t2
dI dL 
 dt            ...dt
  
d t1 d t1 
x x x x 

L d  L  L
t2 t2 t2

t x dt  t  dt  x dt  x  t


1 1 1

Mikhail Vasilievich
Ostrogradsky
(1801 - 1862)
Higher-derivative Lagrangians
 L L L L
t2 t2
dI dL 
 dt             ...dt
d t1 d t1 
x x x x 

L d  L  L
t2 t2 t2

t x dt  t  dt  x dt  x  t


1 1 1

t2
d  L  L d  L 
t2 2 t2

  2  dt     
t1
dt  x  x t1 dt  x  t1
Higher-derivative Lagrangians
 L L L L
t2 t2
dI dL 
 dt             ...dt
d t1 d t1 
x x x x 
L d  L  L
t2 t2 t2

t xdt  t  dt  x dt  x t


1 1 1

t2
d  L  L d  L 
t2 2 t2

  2  dt     


t1
dt  x  x t1 dt  x  t1
t2 t2
d  L  L d  L  d  L 
t2 3 t2 2
   3  dt       2  
t1
dt  x  x t1 dt  x  t1 dt  x  t
1
Higher-derivative Lagrangians
 L d  L  d  L  d  L  
t2 2 3
dI
       2    3    ... dt
d t1  x dt  x  dt  x  dt  x  
 L d  L  d 2  L   t2 p1
      2    ... t
 x dt  
x  dt  
x   1
p2
 L d  L   t2 p3
      ... t
  x dt   
x   1 ...
k i
 L   t2  d
...
L
   ...  t  ...  0 pi     
 x  1 k i  dt  k
d
  x
• Generalized coordinates/momenta:  dt 
q1  x; q2  x; q3  x; q4  x; ...
Higher-derivative Lagrangians
dI
t2
  d 
k 1
L   d 
k 1

    
 dt   pk     t  0
t2

d t1  k 1  dt  qk  k 1  dt  1

• Euler-Lagrange equations:
k 1
 d L
  
k 1  dt  qk
0

• We have formulated a ‘higher-order’ Lagrangian


formalism

• What kind of behavior does it produce?


Example
L  L( x, x , x)
L d L L
q1  x p1   p1   p 2
x dt x x
q2  x L  L
p2  p1  p 2 
x x

L d L  d  L
2
L
   0  p 1
x dt x  dt  x x

H  p1q1  p2q2  L( x, x, x)


L
Example  p 1
x
H  p1q1  p2q2  L( x, x, x)
L L
dH  p1dq1  q1dp1  p2 dq 2  q 2 dp2  dx  dx
x x
L
 dx  p1dq2  q1dp1  p2 dq 2  q 2 dp2  p1dq1
x
  p1  p 2 dq2  p2 dq 2
 q1dp1  q2 dp2  p1dq1  p 2dq2

H H dH
q m  ; p m   ; 0
pm qm dt
L L
 p2  p1  p 2
x x
q1  x  q2
Example
H  p1q1  p2q2  L
• H is conserved and it generates evolution – it is a
Hamiltonian!

H  p1q1  p2q2  L  p1q2  p2q2  L


• Hamiltonian linear in momentum?!?!?!

• No low boundary on the total energy – lack of


ground state!!!

• Produces ‘runaway’ solutions: the system becomes


highly unstable - collapse and explosion at the same
time
‘Runaway’ solutions
• Unrestricted low boundary of the total energy
produces instabilities

• Additionally, we generate new degrees of freedom,


which require introduction of additional (originally
unknown) initial conditions for them

• These problems are solved by means of


introduction of constraints

• Constraints restrict unstable behavior and eliminate


unnecessary new degrees of freedom
9.1
Canonical transformations
• Recall gauge invariance (leaves the evolution of the
system unchanged):
dF
L'  L  L  {qm }; L'  {Qm }
dt
• Let’s combine gauge invariance with Legendre
transformation:
M M
dF

m 1
pm q m  H   PmQm  K 
m 1

dt
 K  K dK K
Qm  ; Pm   ; 
Pm Qm dt t
• K – is the new Hamiltonian (‘Kamiltonian’ )

• K may be functionally different from H


9.1
Canonical transformations
M M
dF

m 1
pm q m  H   PmQm  K 
m 1

dt
• Multiplying by the time differential:
M M

p
m 1
m dqm  Hdt   Pm dQm  Kdt  dF
m 1
M
dF    pm dqm  Pm dQm   K  H dt
m 1
• So
F F F
pm  ; Pm   ;K  H 
qm Qm t
F  F (q1 , q2 ,..., qM , Q1 , Q2 ,..., QM , t )
9.1
Generating functions
F  F1 (q1 , q2 ,..., qM , Q1 , Q2 ,..., QM , t )
• Such functions are called generating functions of
canonical transformations

• They are functions of both the old and the new


canonical variables, so establish a link between the
two sets

• Legendre transformations may yield a variety of


other generating functions
9.1
Generating functions
F  F1 (q1 , q2 ,..., qM , Q1 , Q2 ,..., QM , t )

• We have three additional choices:


M
F  F2 (q1 , q2 ,..., qM , P1 , P2 ,..., PM , t )   Qm Pm
m 1
M
F  F3 ( p1 , p2 ,..., pM , Q1 , Q2 ,..., QM , t )   qm pm
m 1
M
F  F4 ( p1 , p2 ,..., pM , P1 , P2 ,..., PM , t )   qm pm  Qm Pm 
m 1
• Canonical transformations may also be produced by
a mixture of the four generating functions
9.2
An example of a canonical
transformation
M
F F F
F1   qmQm pm  ; Pm   ;K  H 
m 1 qm Qm t

Qm  pm ; Pm  qm ; K  H

• Generalized coordinates are indistinguishable from


their conjugate momenta, and the nomenclature for
them is arbitrary

• Bottom-line: generalized coordinates and their


conjugate momenta should be treated equally in the
phase space
9.4
Criterion for canonical transformations
Q  Q(q, p); P  P(q, p) q  q(Q, P); p  p(Q, P)
• How to make sure this transformation is canonical?
 Q Q H Q H Q
Q  q  p  
q p p q q p
• On the other hand
H H p H q
 
P p P q P
• If
Q p Q q
 ; 
q P p P
• Then
 H
Q
P
9.4
Criterion for canonical transformations
• Similarly,  P P H P H P
P q  p  
q p p q q p

H H p H q
 
Q p Q q Q
• If P p P q
 ; 
q Q p Q

• Then  H
P
Q
9.4
Criterion for canonical transformations
• So,

H H  H  H
q  ; p   Q  ;P   ;
p q P Q

• If

P q Q p P p Q q
 ;  ;  ; 
p Q q P q Q p P
9.4
Canonical transformations in a
symplectic form
H  j  q j ; M  j  p j
η  J
η
• After transformation ζ  ζ (η)  j  Q j ;  M  j  Pj
 i  i
ζ  Aη  AJ H
2M
i  
  j Aij 
j 1  j  j η
• On the other hand

H 2 M H  j H ~ H ~ H
 A ζ  AJA
i j 1  j i η ζ ζ
F
 0 K  H
t
9.4
Canonical transformations in a
symplectic form
~ H
ζ  AJA
ζ H

• For the transformations to be canonical: ζ  J
ζ
• Hence, the canonicity criterion is:
~
AJA  J
• For the case M = 1, it is reduced to (check yourself)

P q Q p P p Q q
 ;  ;  ; 
p Q q P q Q p P
9.3
1D harmonic oscillator
p 2 kq2
H  E
2m 2
• Let us find a conserved canonical momentum
H
P  const P0 
 H  H (P )
Q
• Generating function F  F (q, Q)
1

F F
P p
Q q
 F  F / q  kq
2 2 2 2
p kq
H   H     
2m 2  Q  2m 2
9.3
1D harmonic oscillator
H  F / Q  
F / q  kq2
2

2m 2
• Nonlinear partial differential equation for F 

• Let’s try to separate variables


H  A' b  
 Ab'

2
kq 2
F  A(Q)b(q)
2m 2
• Let’s try b '  q H ( P)  P
 A' q   A
2 2
k 2 A 2
A 2
 km
H       q  A'  k 
 2   2m 2  m m
dA A  km
2
 dA m 1  A 
 Q  m 2  cot  
dQ m A  km k  km 
9.3
1D harmonic oscillator

Q  m / k cot 1 A / km  
A  km cot Q k / m 
 
2
q
F  A(Q)b(q)  km cot Q k / m
2
• We found a generating function!
H
H ( P)  P  E 
Q 1 Q  t  t0
P
F 2
q k
P 
Q 2 sin 2 (Q k / m )

2E
q sin(( t  t0 ) k / m )
k
9.3
1D harmonic oscillator
 
2
q 2E
F  km cot Q k / m q  sin(( t  t ) k / m )
2 k
0

p
F
q
 q km cot Q k / m  
Q  t  t0
  2Em cos((t  t0 ) k / m )
2E
q sin(( t  t0 ) k / m )
k
p   2Em cos((t  t0 ) k / m )

p 2 / 2m  kq2 / 2  E
9.3
1D harmonic oscillator

q, p Q, P
9.5
Canonical invariants
• What remains invariant after a canonical ζ  ζ (η)
transformation? 2M
 i
d i   Aij d j Aij 
j 1  j
• Matrix A is a Jacobian of a space transformation

• From calculus, for elementary volumes: ~


2M 2M 2M AA
 d
i 1
i det( Aij ) di  A  di
i 1 i 1 ~
• Transformation is canonical if AJA  J
~
AJ A  J  0 1 ~
A A 1 A 1
2

~ J    1 0 J  1
AJAJ   A  1
9.5
Canonical invariants
2M 2M 2M

 d
i 1
i  A  di   d i
i 1 i 1

• For a volume in the phase space


2M
V    d i    di  V
2M

i 1
 i 1

• Magnitude of volume in the phase space is invariant


with respect to canonical transformations:

V  V
9.5
Canonical invariants
• What else remains invariant after canonical ζ  ζ (η)
transformations?
v ~ v  i ~
v  v ( η, t ) A Aij  AJA  J
η ζ  j
~ ~ ~
u ~ u  u   ~ u   u 
u  u ( η, t ) A     A     A
η ζ  η   ζ   ζ 
~ ~ ~
 u  v  u  ~ v  u  v
  J    A J A    J
  η  η  ζ  ζ  ζ  ζ
9.5
Canonical invariants
~ ~
 u  v  u  v
  J    J
 η  η  ζ  ζ
• For M = 1
 v   v 
   
 u u  0 1  q   u u  p  u v
      
 q p   1 0  v   q p   v  q p
 p   q 
    v u
• For many variables 
~ q p
 u  v  u v v u 
  J     
 η  η i  qi pi qi pi 
9.5
Poisson brackets
• Poisson brackets:
~
 u  v  u v v u 
  J       [u, v]
 η  η i  qi pi qi pi 
• Poisson brackets are invariant with respect to any
canonical transformation
 u v v u 
i  q p  q p 
 i i i i 

 u v v u 
    
i  Qi Pi Qi Pi  Siméon Denis Poisson
(1781 – 1840)
9.5
Poisson brackets
• Properties of Poisson brackets :

[F , F ]  0
[ F , G ]  [G, F ]
[ F , G  X ]  [ F , G]  [ F , X ]
[ F , GX ]  [ F , G ] X  G[ F , X ]

[aF  bG, X ]  a[ F , X ]  b[G, X ]

[ F , [G, X ]]  [G, [ X , F ]]  [ X , [ F , G ]]  0
9.5
Poisson brackets
~
 η  η
[ η, η]    J 1J1 J
 η  η
• In matrix element notation: [ η, η]lm  [ηl ,ηm ]  J lm
[qi ,q j ]  0 [ qi ,p j ]   ij [ pi ,p j ]  0 [ pi ,q j ]   ij
• In quantum mechanics, for the commutators of
coordinate and momentum operators:

[qˆi ,qˆ j ]  [ pˆ i ,pˆ j ]  0


[qˆi ,pˆ j ]  [ pˆ i ,qˆ j ]  i ij
9.6
Poisson brackets and equations of
u  u ( η, t ) motion
~ ~
du  u  u  u  H u u
   η     J   [u , H ] 
dt  η  t  η  η t t
H du u
η  J   [u , H ]
η dt t
dH H dH H
  [H , H ] 
dt t dt t
dη η η  [ η, H ]
  [ η, H ]
dt t
9.6
Poisson brackets and conservation
laws
du u
  [u , H ]
dt t
• If u is a constant of motion

u
du / dt  0  [H , u]
t
• If u has no explicit time dependence

[H , u]  0
• In quantum mechanics, conserved quantities
commute with the Hamiltonian
9.6
Poisson brackets and conservation
laws
• If u and v are constants of motion with no explicit
time dependence
[ H , u ]  0; [ H , v]  0
• For Poisson brackets:
[ F , [G, X ]]  [G, [ X , F ]]  [ X , [ F , G ]]  0
[u, [v, H ]]  [v, [ H , u ]]  [ H , [u, v]]  0
d [u , v]
0
dt
• If we know at least two constants of motion, we can
obtain further constants of motion
9.4
Infinitesimal canonical transformations
• Let us consider a canonical transformation with the
following generating function (ε – small parameter):
M
F   G (q1 , q2 ,..., qM , P1 , P2 ,..., PM )   (qm  Qm ) Pm
m 1
• Then M


M M
dF  P Q  K

m 1
pm q m  H   PmQm  K 
m 1

dt m 1
m m

 G
M
G   M
    q m  Pm    (q m  Q m ) Pm
m 1  qm Pm  m 1
M
  (qm  Qm ) Pm
m 1
9.4
Infinitesimal canonical transformations
• Multiplying by dt
M M

p
m 1
m dqm  Hdt   Pm dQm  K dt
m 1

 G
M
G  M
    dqm  dPm    ( Pm dqm  Pm dQm )
m 1  qm Pm  m 1
M
  (qm dPm  Qm dPm )
m 1

• Then
G G
Pm  pm   Qm  qm   KH
qm Pm
9.4
Infinitesimal canonical transformations
• Infinitesimal canonical transformations:
G G G
Pm  pm   ; Qm  qm    qm     ...
2

qm Pm pm


• In symplectic notation:
G ζ   G 
ζ  η J A  1  J 
η η η  η 
~
 u  v G
[u , v]    J ζη J
 η  η η
ζ  η   [ η, G ]
v G
[ η, v]  1 J [ η, G]  J
η η
9.6
Evolution generation
ζ  η   [ η, G ] ζ  η  dt [ η, H ]  dt η  dη
  dt G  H [ η, H ]  η ζ  η  dη

• Motion of the system in time interval dt can be


described as an infinitesimal transformation
generated by the Hamiltonian

• The system motion in a finite time interval is a


succession of infinitesimal transformations,
equivalent to a single finite canonical transformation

• Evolution of the system is a canonical


transformation!!!
9.9
Application to statistical mechanics
• In statistical mechanics we deal with huge numbers
of particles

• Instead of describing each particle separately, we


describe a given state of the system

• Each state of the system represents a point in the


phase space

• We cannot determine the initial conditions exactly

• Instead, we study a certain phase volume –


ensemble – as it evolves in time
9.9
Application to statistical mechanics
• Ensemble can be described by its density – a
number of representative points in a given phase
volume N
D
V
• The number of representative points does not
change
N  const
• Ensemble evolution can be thought as a canonical
transformation generated by the Hamiltonian

• Volume of a phase space is a constant for a


canonical transformation
V  const
9.9
Application to statistical mechanics
• Ensemble is evolving so its density is evolving too
dD D
  [ D, H ]
dt t N const
• On the other hand D   const
V const
D
 [ H , D]
t
• Liouville’s theorem

• In statistical equilibrium
D
 0 [ H , D ]  0
t Joseph Liouville
(1809 -1882)
10.1
Hamilton–Jacobi theory
• We can look for the following canonical
transformation, relating the constant (e.g. initial)
values of the variables with the current ones:

qi 0  qi 0 (q1 ,..., qM , p1 ,..., pM , t )


pi 0  pi 0 (q1 ,..., qM , p1 ,..., pM , t )

• The reverse transformations will give us a complete


solution

qi  qi (q10 ,..., qM 0 , p10 ,..., pM 0 , t )


pi  pi (q10 ,..., qM 0 , p10 ,..., pM 0 , t )
10.1
Hamilton–Jacobi theory
• Let us assume that the Kamiltonian is identically
zero K  0
Q i  K / Pi  0; Pi  K / Qi  0;
• Then
Qi  const ; Pi  const ;
• Choosing the following generating function
F  F2 (q1 ,..., qM , P1 ,..., PM , t )   Qi Pi
i
• Then, for such canonical transformation:
pi  F2 / qi Qi  F2 / Pi K  H  F2 / t
H (q1 ,..., qM , p1 ,..., pM , t )  F2 / t  0
F2 F2 F2
H (q1 ,..., qM , ,..., , t)  0
q1 qM t
10.1
Hamilton–Jacobi theory
F2 F2 F2
H (q1 ,..., qM , ,..., , t)  0
q1 qM t
Sir William Rowan
• Hamilton–Jacobi equation
Hamilton
(1805 – 1865)
• Conventionally: S  F2 Hamilton’s principal function
S S S
H (q1 ,..., qM , ,..., , t)  0
q1 qM t
• Partial differential equation

• First order differential equation


Karl Gustav Jacob
• Number of variables: M + 1 Jacobi
(1804 – 1851)
10.1
Hamilton–Jacobi theory
H (q1 ,..., qM , S / q1 ,..., S / qM , t )  S / t  0
• Suppose the solution exists, so it will produce M + 1
constants of integration:
S  S (q1 ,..., qM ,1 ,..., M 1 , t )
• One constant is evident:
S (q1 ,..., qM , 1 ,...,  M 1 , t )
H  S / t  0  S (q1 ,..., qM , 1 ,...,  M , t )   M 1
• We chose those M constants to be the new
momenta P 
i i

• While the old momenta


S (q1 ,..., qM , 1 ,...,  M , t )
pi 
qi
10.1
Hamilton–Jacobi theory
• We relate the constants with the initial values of our
old variables:
S (q1 ,..., qM , 1 ,...,  M , t )
pi 0 
qi q q
i i 0 ;t  t 0
• The new coordinates are defined as:

S (q1 ,..., qM , 1 ,...,  M , t )


Qi   i 
 i q q
i i 0 ;t  t 0

• Inverting those formulas we solve our problem

qi  qi (1 ,...,  M , 1 ,...,  M , t )


pi  pi (1 ,...,  M , 1 ,...,  M , t )
10.1
Have we met before?
dS S S
 qi 
dt i qi t
S
pi  H  S / t  0
q i

dS
  pi qi  H  L S   Ldt  const
dt i

• Remember action?

t2
I   Ldt  S (t2 )  S (t1 )
t1
10.1
Hamilton’s characteristic function
• When the Hamiltonian does not depend on time
explicitly
dH / dt  H / t  0
• Generating function (Hamilton’s characteristic
function)
F2  W (q1 ,..., qM ,1 ,..., M )
W W
Qi    W W
Pi  i H  H (q1 ,..., qM , ,..., )
W q1 qM
pi 
qi
W W    pi dqi  const
qi   pi qi
dW

dt i qi i i
10.3
Hamilton’s characteristic function
W W
• Now we require: H (q1 ,..., qM , ,..., )  1
q1 qM
• So:
W K  K
KH K  1 
Pi   ; Qi 
t Qi Pi
Pi  0 Pi   i ;

Q i   i1 ; Q1  t  1  W / 1;
Qi  i  W /  i ; i  1
• Detailed comparison of Hamilton’s characteristic vs.
Hamilton’s principal is given in a textbook (10.3)
10.3
Hamilton’s characteristic function
• What is the relationship between S and W ?

H  S / t  0  K S H  1  KW

• One of possible relationships (the most


conventional):

S (q1,..., qM ,1 ,..., M , t )  W (q1 ,..., qM ,1 ,..., M )  1t

H  1  0
10.6
Periodic motion
• For energies small enough we have periodic
oscillations (librations) – green curves

• For energies great enough we msy have periodic


rotations – red curves

• Blue curve – separatrix trajectory – bifurcation


transition from librations to rotations
10.6
Action-angle variables
• For either type of periodic motion let us introduce a
new variable – action variable (don’t confuse with
J   pdq
action!):

H ( q, p )   p  p ( q,  ) J  J ( ) W  W ( q, J )
• A generalized coordinate conjugate to action
variable is the angle variable: W
w
J
• The equation of motion for the angle variable:

H ( J ) S   Ldt  const
w   v( J )  const
J W    pi dqi  const
i
10.6
Action-angle variables
w  v w  vt  
• In a compete cycle
w W 2
 W d
w   dq   dq   dq   pdq
q qJ J q dJ
d
 J  1  (v(t   )   )  (vt   ) 1  v
dJ
v  1/ 
• This is a frequency of the periodic motion

W W
w p J   pdq
J q
10.2
Example: 1D Harmonic oscillator
H
1
2m
 p  m  q   E;
2 2 2 2
  k/m
2

1   W  
2
W 2 2 2
p H    m  q  
q 2m   q  
 
m q2 2
W  2m  1 dq
2
m 2 q 2
S  2m  1  dq  t
2
S m dq 1 m2



2  m 2 q 2
 t  arcsin q
 2
t
1
2
10.2
Example: 1D Harmonic oscillator
1 m 2
2
  arcsin q t q sin(   t )
 2 m 2

W 2 2 2  2m cos(  t )
p  2m  m  q
q
( p 2  m2 2 q 2 ) / 2m  E    E

2E
q sin(   t ) p  2mE cos(  t )
m 2

W  2m  1
m 2 q 2
dq
mq0 / p0  tan(   t0 )
2
10.6
Action-angle variables for 1D harmonic
oscillator 2
q
W m
sin z
2

p  2m  m  q
2 2 2

q
2
2 2
J   pdq   2m  m  q dq   cos zdz 
2 2 2 2

 0 
J
H  
2
• Therefore, for the frequency:

H  k /m
v  
J 2 2
10.4
Separation of variables in the Hamilton-
Jacobi equation
• Sometimes, the principal function can be
successfully separated in the following way:
S   Si (qi , 1 ,...,  M , t )
i
Si Si
H i (qi , , 1 ,...,  M , t )  0
qi t
• For the Hamiltonian without an explicit time
dependence:
Wi
Si  Wi   i t H i (qi , , 1 ,...,  M )   i
qi
• Functions Hi may or may not be Hamiltonians

You might also like