Wireless Power Transmission

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 39

Wireless Power Transmission

Presented by
RAKESH ROSHAN

SRM UNIVERSITY
Overview
What is wireless power
transmission(WPT)?
Why is WPT?
History of WPT
Types of WPT
◦ Techniques to transfer energy wirelessly
Advantages and disadvantages
Applications
Conclusion
References
What is WPT?
The transmission of energy from one
place to another without using wires
Conventional energy transfer is using
wires
But, the wireless transmission is made
possible by using various technologies
Why not wires?
As per studies, most electrical energy
transfer is through wires.
Most of the energy loss is during
transmission
• On an average, more than 30%
• In India, it exceeds 40%
Why WPT?

Reliable
Efficient
Fast
Low maintenance cost
Can be used for short-range or
long-range.
History
Nikola Tesla in late 1890s
Pioneer of induction techniques
His vision for “World Wireless System”
The 187 feet tall tower to broadcast
energy
All people can have access to free
energy
Due to shortage of funds, tower did n
operate
History (contd…)
Tesla was able to transfer energy from
one coil to another coil
He managed to light 200 lamps from a
distance of 40km
The idea of Tesla is taken in to
research after 100 years by a team led
by Marin Soljačić from MIT. The
project is named as „WiTricity‟.
Energy Coupling
The transfer of energy
◦ Magnetic coupling
◦ Inductive coupling
Simplest Wireless Energy coupling is
a transformer
Types and Technologies of
WPT
Near-field techniques
 Inductive Coupling
 Resonant Inductive Coupling
 Air Ionization
Far-field techniques
 Microwave Power Transmission (MPT)
 LASER power transmission
Inductive coupling
Primary and secondary coils are not
connected with wires.
Energy transfer is due to Mutual
Induction

8/31/2010 Wireless Power Transmission


Inductive coupling (contd…)
Transformer is also an example
Energy transfer devices are usually air-
cored
Wireless Charging Pad(WCP),electric
brushes are some examples
On a WCP, the devices are to be kept,
battery will be automatically charged.
Inductive coupling(contd…)
Electric brush also charges using
inductive coupling
The charging pad (primary coil) and
the device(secondary coil) have to be
kept very near to each other
It is preferred because it is
comfortable.
Less use of wires
Shock proof
Resonance Inductive
Coupling(RIC)
Combination of inductive coupling and
resonance
Resonance makes two objects interact
very strongly
Inductance induces current
How resonance in RIC?
Coil provides the inductance
Capacitor is connected parallel to the
coil
Energy will be shifting back and forth
between magnetic field surrounding
the coil and electric field around the
capacitor
Radiation loss will be negligible
Block diagram of RIC
An example
WiTricity
Based on RIC
Led by MIT‟sMarin Soljačić
Energy transfer wirelessly for a
distance just more than 2m.
Coils were in helical shape
No capacitor was used
Efficiency achieved was around 40%
WiTricity (contd…)
WiTricity
Used frequencies are
1MHz and 10MHz
At 1Mhz, field strengths
were safe for human
At 10MHz, Field
strengths were more than
ICNIRP standards
WiTricity now…
No more helical coils
Companies like Intel are also working
on devices that make use of RIC
Researches for decreasing the field
strength
Researches to increase the range
RIC vs. inductive coupling
RIC is highly efficient
RIC has much greater range than
inductive coupling
RIC is directional when compared to
inductive coupling
RIC can be one-to-many. But usually
inductive coupling is one-to-one
Devices using RIC technique are
highly portable
Air Ionization
Toughest technique
under near-field energy
transfer techniques
Air ionizes only when
there is a high field
Needed field is
2.11MV/m
Natural example:
Lightening
Not feasible for
PRACTICAL
implementation
Advantages of near-field
techniques
No wires
No e-waste
Need for battery is
eliminated
Efficient energy
transfer using RIC
Harmless, if field
strengths under
safety levels
Maintenance cost
is less
Disadvantages
Distance constraint
Field strengths have to be under
safety levels
Initial cost is high
In RIC, tuning is difficult
High frequency signals must be the
supply
Air ionization technique is not feasible
Far-field energy transfer
Radiative
Needs line-of-sight
LASER or microwave
Aims at high power transfer
Tesla‟s tower was built for this
Microwave Power
Transfer(MPT)
Transfers high power from one place
to another. Two places being in line of
sight usually
Steps:
◦ Electrical energy to microwave energy
◦ Capturing microwaves using rectenna
◦ Microwave energy to electrical energy
MP T (contd…)
AC can not be directly converted to
microwave energy
AC is converted to DC first
DC is converted to microwaves using
magnetron
Transmitted waves are received at
rectenna which rectifies, gives DC as
the output
DC is converted back to AC
LASER transmission
LASER is highly directional, coherent
Not dispersed for very long
But, gets attenuated when it
propagates through atmosphere
Simple receiver
◦ Photovoltaic cell
Cost-efficient
Solar Power Satellites (SPS)

To provide energy to earth‟s


increasing energy need
To efficiently make use of
renewable energy i.e., solar energy
SPS are placed in geostationary
orbits
Rectenna
Stands for rectifying antenna
Consists of mesh of dipoles and
diodes
Converts microwave to its DC
equivalent
Usually multi-element pha sed array
Rectenna in US
Rectenna in US receives 5000MW of
power from SPS
It is about one and a half mile long
Other projects
Alaska‟21

Grand Bassin
Hawaii
LASER vs. MPT
When LASER is used, the antenna
sizes can be much smaller
Microwaves can face interference (two
frequencies can be used for WPT are
2.45GHz and 5.4GHz)
LASER has high attenuation loss and
also it gets diffracted by atmospheric
particles easily
Advantages of far-field energy
transfer
Efficient
Easy
Need for grids, substations etc are
eliminated
Low maintenance cost
More effective when the transmitting
and receiving points are along a line-
of-sight
Can reach the places which are
remote
Disadvantages of far-field energy
trasnfer
Radiative
Needs line-of-sight
Initial cost is high
When LASERs are used,
◦ conversion is inefficient
◦ Absorption loss is high
When microwaves are used,
◦ interference may arise
◦ FRIED BIRD effect
Applications
Near-field energy transfer
◦ Electric automobile charging
Static and moving
◦ Consumer electronics
◦ Industrial purposes
Harsh environment
Far-field energy transfer
◦ Solar Power Satellites
◦ Energy to remote areas
◦ Can broadcast energy globally (in future)
Conclusion
Transmission without wires- a reality
Efficient
Low maintenance cost. But, high initial cost
Better than conventional wired transfer
Energy crisis can be decreased
Low loss
In near future, world will be completely
wireless
References
S. Sheik Mohammed, K. Ramasamy, T. Shanmuganantham,”
Wireless power transmission – a next generation power
transmission system”, International Journal of Computer
Applications (0975 – 8887) (Volume 1 – No. 13)
Peter Vaessen,” Wireless Power Transmission”, Leonardo
Energy, September 2009
C.C. Leung, T.P. Chan, K.C. Lit, K.W. Tam and Lee Yi Chow,
“Wireless Power Transmission and Charging Pad”
David Schneider, “Electrons unplugged”, IEEE Spectrum,
May 2010
Shahrzad Jalali Mazlouman, Alireza Mahanfar, Bozena
Kaminska, “Mid-range Wireless Energy Transfer Using
Inductive Resonance for Wireless Sensors”
Chunbo Zhu, Kai Liu, Chunlai Yu, Rui Ma, Hexiao Cheng,
“Simulation and Experimental Analysis on Wireless Energy
Transfer Based on Magnetic Resonances”, IEEE Vehicle
Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), September 3-5,
2008
THANK YOU!

You might also like