Mass-Storage Systems: Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013 Operating System Concepts - 9 Edition
Mass-Storage Systems: Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013 Operating System Concepts - 9 Edition
Mass-Storage Systems: Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013 Operating System Concepts - 9 Edition
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Mass-Storage Systems
Overview of Mass Storage Structure
Disk Structure
Disk Attachment
Disk Scheduling
Disk Management
Swap-Space Management
RAID Structure
Stable-Storage Implementation
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.2 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Objectives
To describe the physical structure of secondary storage devices
and its effects on the uses of the devices
To explain the performance characteristics of mass-storage
devices
To evaluate disk scheduling algorithms
To discuss operating-system services provided for mass storage,
including RAID
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.3 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Overview of Mass Storage Structure
Magnetic disks provide bulk of secondary storage of modern computers
Drives rotate at 60 to 250 times per second
Transfer rate is rate at which data flow between drive and computer
Positioning time (random-access time) is time to move disk arm to
desired cylinder (seek time) and time for desired sector to rotate
under the disk head (rotational latency)
Head crash results from disk head making contact with the disk
surface -- That’s bad
Disks can be removable
Drive attached to computer via I/O bus
Busses vary, including EIDE, ATA, SATA, USB, Fibre Channel,
SCSI, SAS, Firewire
Host controller in computer uses bus to talk to disk controller built
into drive or storage array
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.4 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Moving-head Disk Mechanism
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.5 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Hard Disks
Platters range from .85” to 14” (historically)
Commonly 3.5”, 2.5”, and 1.8”
Range from 30GB to 3TB per drive
Performance
Transfer Rate – theoretical – 6 Gb/sec
Effective Transfer Rate – real –
1Gb/sec
Seek time from 3ms to 12ms – 9ms
common for desktop drives
Average seek time measured or
calculated based on 1/3 of tracks
Latency based on spindle speed
1 / (RPM / 60) = 60 / RPM (From Wikipedia)
Average latency = ½ latency
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.6 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Hard Disk Performance
Access Latency = Average access time = average seek time +
average latency
For fastest disk 3ms + 2ms = 5ms
For slow disk 9ms + 5.56ms = 14.56ms
Average I/O time = average access time + (amount to transfer /
transfer rate) + controller overhead
For example to transfer a 4KB block on a 7200 RPM disk with a
5ms average seek time, 1Gb/sec transfer rate with a .1ms
controller overhead =
5ms + 4.17ms + 0.1ms + transfer time =
Transfer time = 4KB / 1Gb/s * 8Gb / GB * 1GB / 10242KB =
32 / (10242) = 0.031 ms
Average I/O time for 4KB block = 9.27ms + .031ms =
9.301ms
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.7 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
The First Commercial Disk Drive
1956
IBM RAMDAC computer
included the IBM Model
350 disk storage system
5M (7 bit) characters
50 x 24” platters
Access time = < 1 second
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.8 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Solid-State Disks
Nonvolatile memory used like a hard drive
Many technology variations
Can be more reliable than HDDs
More expensive per MB
Maybe have shorter life span
Less capacity
But much faster
Busses can be too slow -> connect directly to PCI for example
No moving parts, so no seek time or rotational latency
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.9 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Magnetic Tape
Was early secondary-storage medium
Evolved from open spools to cartridges
Relatively permanent and holds large quantities of data
Access time slow
Random access ~1000 times slower than disk
Mainly used for backup, storage of infrequently-used data,
transfer medium between systems
Kept in spool and wound or rewound past read-write head
Once data under head, transfer rates comparable to disk
140MB/sec and greater
200GB to 1.5TB typical storage
Common technologies are LTO-{3,4,5} and T10000
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.10 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Disk Structure
Disk drives are addressed as large 1-dimensional arrays of logical
blocks, where the logical block is the smallest unit of transfer
Low-level formatting creates logical blocks on physical media
The 1-dimensional array of logical blocks is mapped into the sectors
of the disk sequentially
Sector 0 is the first sector of the first track on the outermost
cylinder
Mapping proceeds in order through that track, then the rest of the
tracks in that cylinder, and then through the rest of the cylinders
from outermost to innermost
Logical to physical address should be easy
Except for bad sectors
Non-constant # of sectors per track via constant angular
velocity
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.11 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Disk Attachment
Host-attached storage accessed through I/O ports talking to I/O
busses
SCSI itself is a bus, up to 16 devices on one cable, SCSI initiator
requests operation and SCSI targets perform tasks
Each target can have up to 8 logical units (disks attached to
device controller)
FC is high-speed serial architecture
Can be switched fabric with 24-bit address space – the basis of
storage area networks (SANs) in which many hosts attach to
many storage units
I/O directed to bus ID, device ID, logical unit (LUN)
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.12 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Storage Array
Can just attach disks, or arrays of disks
Storage Array has controller(s), provides features to attached
host(s)
Ports to connect hosts to array
Memory, controlling software (sometimes NVRAM, etc)
A few to thousands of disks
RAID, hot spares, hot swap
Shared storage -> more efficiency
Features found in some file systems
Snaphots, clones, thin provisioning, replication,
deduplication, etc
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.13 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Storage Area Network
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.14 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Storage Area Network (Cont.)
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.15 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Network-Attached Storage
Network-attached storage (NAS) is storage made available over
a network rather than over a local connection (such as a bus)
Remotely attaching to file systems
NFS and CIFS are common protocols
Implemented via remote procedure calls (RPCs) between host
and storage over typically TCP or UDP on IP network
iSCSI protocol uses IP network to carry the SCSI protocol
Remotely attaching to devices (blocks)
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.16 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Disk Scheduling
The operating system is responsible for using hardware
efficiently — for the disk drives, this means having a fast
access time and disk bandwidth
Minimize seek time
Seek time seek distance
Disk bandwidth is the total number of bytes transferred,
divided by the total time between the first request for service
and the completion of the last transfer
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.17 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Disk Scheduling (Cont.)
There are many sources of disk I/O request
OS
System processes
Users processes
I/O request includes input or output mode, disk address, memory
address, number of sectors to transfer
OS maintains queue of requests, per disk or device
Idle disk can immediately work on I/O request, busy disk means
work must queue
Optimization algorithms only make sense when a queue exists
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.18 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Disk Scheduling (Cont.)
Note that drive controllers have small buffers and can manage a
queue of I/O requests (of varying “depth”)
Several algorithms exist to schedule the servicing of disk I/O
requests
The analysis is true for one or many platters
We illustrate scheduling algorithms with a request queue (0-199)
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.19 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
FCFS
Illustration shows total head movement of 640 cylinders
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.20 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
SSTF
Shortest Seek Time First selects the request with the minimum
seek time from the current head position
SSTF scheduling is a form of SJF scheduling; may cause
starvation of some requests
Illustration shows total head movement of 236 cylinders
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.21 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
SCAN
The disk arm starts at one end of the disk, and moves toward the
other end, servicing requests until it gets to the other end of the
disk, where the head movement is reversed and servicing
continues.
SCAN algorithm Sometimes called the elevator algorithm
Illustration shows total head movement of 236 cylinders
But note that if requests are uniformly dense, largest density at
other end of disk and those wait the longest
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.22 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
SCAN (Cont.)
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.23 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
C-SCAN
Provides a more uniform wait time than SCAN
The head moves from one end of the disk to the other, servicing
requests as it goes
When it reaches the other end, however, it immediately
returns to the beginning of the disk, without servicing any
requests on the return trip
Treats the cylinders as a circular list that wraps around from the
last cylinder to the first one
Total number of cylinders?
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.24 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
C-SCAN (Cont.)
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.25 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
C-LOOK
LOOK a version of SCAN, C-LOOK a version of C-SCAN
Arm only goes as far as the last request in each direction,
then reverses direction immediately, without first going all
the way to the end of the disk
Total number of cylinders?
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.26 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
C-LOOK (Cont.)
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.27 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Selecting a Disk-Scheduling Algorithm
SSTF is common and has a natural appeal
SCAN and C-SCAN perform better for systems that place a heavy load
on the disk
Less starvation
Performance depends on the number and types of requests
Requests for disk service can be influenced by the file-allocation method
And metadata layout
The disk-scheduling algorithm should be written as a separate module of
the operating system, allowing it to be replaced with a different algorithm
if necessary
Either SSTF or LOOK is a reasonable choice for the default algorithm
What about rotational latency?
Difficult for OS to calculate
How does disk-based queueing effect OS queue ordering efforts?
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.28 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Disk Management
Low-level formatting, or physical formatting — Dividing a disk into
sectors that the disk controller can read and write
Each sector can hold header information, plus data, plus error
correction code (ECC)
Usually 512 bytes of data but can be selectable
To use a disk to hold files, the operating system still needs to record its
own data structures on the disk
Partition the disk into one or more groups of cylinders, each treated
as a logical disk
Logical formatting or “making a file system”
To increase efficiency most file systems group blocks into clusters
Disk I/O done in blocks
File I/O done in clusters
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.29 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Disk Management (Cont.)
Raw disk access for apps that want to do their own block
management, keep OS out of the way (databases for example)
Boot block initializes system
The bootstrap is stored in ROM
Bootstrap loader program stored in boot blocks of boot
partition
Methods such as sector sparing used to handle bad blocks
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.30 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Booting from a Disk in Windows
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.31 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Swap-Space Management
Swap-space — Virtual memory uses disk space as an extension of main memory
Less common now due to memory capacity increases
Swap-space can be carved out of the normal file system, or, more commonly, it
can be in a separate disk partition (raw)
Swap-space management
4.3BSD allocates swap space when process starts; holds text segment (the
program) and data segment
Kernel uses swap maps to track swap-space use
Solaris 2 allocates swap space only when a dirty page is forced out of
physical memory, not when the virtual memory page is first created
File data written to swap space until write to file system requested
Other dirty pages go to swap space due to no other home
Text segment pages thrown out and reread from the file system as
needed
What if a system runs out of swap space?
Some systems allow multiple swap spaces
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.32 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Data Structures for Swapping on Linux Systems
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.33 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
RAID Structure
RAID – redundant array of inexpensive disks
multiple disk drives provides reliability via redundancy
Increases the mean time to failure
Mean time to repair – exposure time when another failure could
cause data loss
Mean time to data loss based on above factors
If mirrored disks fail independently, consider disk with 100,000 mean
time to failure and 10 hour mean time to repair
Mean time to data loss is 100, 0002 / (2 ∗ 10) = 500 ∗ 106
hours, or 57,000 years!
Frequently combined with NVRAM to improve write performance
Several improvements in disk-use techniques involve the use of
multiple disks working cooperatively
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.34 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
RAID (Cont.)
Disk striping uses a group of disks as one storage unit
RAID is arranged into six different levels
RAID schemes improve performance and improve the reliability of
the storage system by storing redundant data
Mirroring or shadowing (RAID 1) keeps duplicate of each
disk
Striped mirrors (RAID 1+0) or mirrored stripes (RAID 0+1)
provides high performance and high reliability
Block interleaved parity (RAID 4, 5, 6) uses much less
redundancy
RAID within a storage array can still fail if the array fails, so
automatic replication of the data between arrays is common
Frequently, a small number of hot-spare disks are left
unallocated, automatically replacing a failed disk and having data
rebuilt onto them
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.35 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
RAID Levels
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.36 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
RAID (0 + 1) and (1 + 0)
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.37 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Other Features
Regardless of where RAID implemented, other useful features
can be added
Snapshot is a view of file system before a set of changes take
place (i.e. at a point in time)
Replication is automatic duplication of writes between separate
sites
For redundancy and disaster recovery
Can be synchronous or asynchronous
Hot spare disk is unused, automatically used by RAID production
if a disk fails to replace the failed disk and rebuild the RAID set if
possible
Decreases mean time to repair
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.38 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Extensions
RAID alone does not prevent or detect data corruption or other
errors, just disk failures
Solaris ZFS adds checksums of all data and metadata
Checksums kept with pointer to object, to detect if object is the
right one and whether it changed
Can detect and correct data and metadata corruption
ZFS also removes volumes, partitions
Disks allocated in pools
Filesystems with a pool share that pool, use and release
space like malloc() and free() memory allocate /
release calls
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.39 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
ZFS Checksums All Metadata and Data
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.40 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Traditional and Pooled Storage
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.41 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Stable-Storage Implementation
Write-ahead log scheme requires stable storage
Stable storage means data is never lost (due to failure, etc)
To implement stable storage:
Replicate information on more than one nonvolatile storage media
with independent failure modes
Update information in a controlled manner to ensure that we can
recover the stable data after any failure during data transfer or
recovery
Disk write has 1 of 3 outcomes
1. Successful completion - The data were written correctly on disk
2. Partial failure - A failure occurred in the midst of transfer, so only
some of the sectors were written with the new data, and the sector
being written during the failure may have been corrupted
3. Total failure - The failure occurred before the disk write started, so
the previous data values on the disk remain intact
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.42 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Stable-Storage Implementation (Cont.)
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.43 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013
Quiz 2
Suppose that a disk drive has 5,000 cylinders, numbered 0 to 4,999. The
drive is currently serving a request at cylinder 2,150, and the previous
request was at cylinder 1,805. The queue of pending requests, in FIFO
order, is:
2,069, 1,212, 2,296, 2,800, 544, 1,618, 356, 1,523, 4,965, 3681
Starting from the current head position, what is the total distance (in
cylinders) that the disk arm moves to satisfy all the pending requests
for each of the following disk-scheduling algorithms?
SSTF
SCAN
Operating System Concepts – 9th Edition 10.44 Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2013