Hydropower Engineering: Hydrology and Hydraulic Design Concept of Hydropower
Hydropower Engineering: Hydrology and Hydraulic Design Concept of Hydropower
Hydropower Engineering: Hydrology and Hydraulic Design Concept of Hydropower
Chapter 3
Hydrology and Hydraulic Design Concept of
Hydropower
Lecture 1
Contents
Energy-Work Approach
dP = dP =
dP= ρg*dq*h
Summing the elemental power components of the total discharge
passing through the turbine gives the theoretical power equation
P = ρ*g*Q*h
Where P = unit power capacity, Watt (W)
ρ = mass density of water (kg/m3)
g = acceleration of gravity, (m/s2)
h = effective head (m)
To compareP kilowatts
= ηρgQh and horsepower remember thatPkw 0.746 Php
Mathematical development in terms of energy grade lines and
hydraulic grade lines, using the Energy Equation.
v12 p1 v22 p2
z1 z 2 h f Cons.
2g 2g
where V1 = water velocity at point 1
p1 = pressure at point 1
γ = ρg = specific weight of water
Z1 = potential head at point 1
referenced to the datum
V2 =water velocity at point 2
p2 =pressure at point 2
Z2 =potential head at point 2
hf = head loss in flow passage between
points 1 and 2
Referring to the Figure,
the Energy equation for
a hydropower
installation is first
written between point 1
at the surface of the
fore-bay and point 2 at
the entrance to the
turbine as
v12 p1 v22 p2
z1 z 2 h f ... (1)
2g 2g
Then the Energy equation is written between points 2
and 3, the surface of the water at the exit to the draft
2 2
v
tube; 2 p v p3
2
z2 3
z3 h... ( 2)
2g 2g
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Exceedence in %
Flow duration curve very often, plotted using the
average monthly values of the flow.
The capacity estimate for firm power is then made by
using the entire recorded flow data and plotting in a
single flow duration curve.
In such a case two different methods are in use.
(I) The total period /rank ordered method, and
(II) The calendar year/ Class - interval method.
Both methods utilize the flow data available for the
entire period for which records are available.
(Assignment2) Clearly discuss and identify the above
two methods.
16
Total period method/Rank- ordered method
Considers a total time series of flows that represent
equal increments of time for each measurement value,
such as mean daily, weekly, or monthly flows, and ranks
the flows according to magnitude.
The entire available record is used for drawing the FDC.
Thus, ten years’ record would produce 120 values of
monthly average flows.
Procedures to be followed to draw the FDC
First tabulate the flow in the ascending/descending
order starting from the driest month in the entire
period and ending with the wettest month of the given
year duration.
17
The rank-ordered values are assigned individual order
numbers, the smallest beginning with order
The order numbers are then divided by the total
number in the record and multiplied by 100 to obtain
the percent of time that the mean flow has been
equaled or exceeded during the period of record being
considered.
The flow value is then plotted versus the respective
computed equaled or exceeded percentage.
For the 10 year monthly data, the FDC would then be
drawn with the help of 120 values.
Calendar year method/Class Interval Method
Each year’s/interval average monthly/interval values are first
arranged in ascending order.
Then the average flow values corresponding to the driest year,
second driest year, and so on up to the wettest month are found
out by taking arithmetic mean of all values of the same rank.
These average values are then used for plotting flow duration
curve.
Such a curve for example would have only ten points for the ten
year example.
The class-interval technique: is slightly different in that the time
series of flow values are categorized into class intervals.
The classes range from the highest flow value to the lowest value
in the time series.
A tally is made of the number of flows in each, and by
summation the number of values greater than a given
upper limit of the class can be determined.
The number of flows greater than the upper limit of a class
interval can be divided by the total number of flow values
in the data series to obtain the equaled or exceeded
percentage.
The value of the flow for the particular upper limit of the
class interval is then plotted versus the computed equaled
or exceeded percent.
The total period/rank ordered method gives more
correct results than the calendar year method which
averages out extreme events.
Naturally, the longer the record, the more statistically
valuable the information that results.
Characteristics of Flow Duration Curves
The flow duration curve (FDC) shows how flow is
distributed over a period (usually a year).
A steep flow duration curve implies a flashy
catchment one which is subject to extreme floods and
droughts.
Factors which cause a catchment to be flashy are;
Rocky, shallow soil,
Lack of vegetation cover,
Steep, short streams,
Uneven rainfall (frequent storms, long dry periods).
21
Such type of FDC (i.e. steep) is not suitable for hydropower
development (especially run-of-river type).
A flat flow duration curve is good because it means that the
total annual flow will be spread more evenly over the year,
giving a useful flow for longer periods, and less severe
floods.
Since the area under the curve represents the volume
of flow, the storage will affect the flow duration curve
as shown by the dashed line in the Fig.; i.e., reducing
the extreme flows and increasing the very low flows.
23
Power Duration Curve (PDC)
Before any power plant is contemplated, it is essential to assess
the inherent power available from the discharge of the river and
the head available at the site.
The gross head of any proposed scheme can be assessed by
simple surveying techniques, whereas
Hydrological data on rainfall and runoff are essential in order
to assess the quantity of water available.
The hydrological data necessary for potential assessment are:
The daily, weekly, or monthly flow over a period of several
years, to determine the plant capacity and estimate
output,
Low flows, to assess the primary, firm or dependable
power.
24
P
Remember that the power is given by wQgh
The above equation is for theoretical conditions. The
actual output is diminished by the fact that the turbine has
losses in transforming the potential and kinetic energy
into mechanical energy. Thus an efficiency term (ɳ),
usually called overall efficiency, must be introduced to
give the standard power equation;
P wQgh
• The actual use of the equation for estimating the potential (P);
however, is made difficult due to the fact that the discharge of
any river varies over a wide range.
• High discharges are available only for short durations in a
year. Thus the corresponding available power would be of
short duration.
• Power duration curve can also be plotted since power is
directly proportional to the discharge and available head.
• Discharge/Power duration curve indicates discharge or
power available in the stream for the given percentage of
time.
If the head is presumed to be constant at an average value,
power duration curve would exactly correspond to FDC.
This is very often the procedure in elementary rough
calculations. If, however, a precise power duration curve is
desired, then the head corresponding to any discharge is
required to be known.
0 50 95 100
Percentage of time equaled or exceeded
Power Potential
Minimum potential power computed from the minimum flow
available for 100 % of the time (365 days or 8760 hours). This is
represented as P100;
Small potential power computed from the flow available for 95 %
of time (flow available for 8322 hours). This is represented as P95;
Average potential power computed from the flow available for 50%
of the time (flow available for 6 months or 4380 hours). This is
represented as P50;
Mean potential power computed from the average of mean yearly
flows for a period of 10 to 30 years, which is equal to the area of the
flow-duration curve corresponding to this mean year. This is known
as ‘Gross river power potential’ and is represented as Pm.
Technically available power: With conveyance efficiency of 70%
and overall efficiency of the plant as 80%, a combined multiplying
factor of 0.56 should be used with the average potential power, P50;
The value of net water power capable of being developed
technically is also computed from the potential water power by
certain reduction factors to account for losses of head in the
conveyance and losses associated with energy conversion. This
factor to be about 0.75 or 0.80, i.e
Pm net 7.4 to 8.0 Qm h
Solution
The yearly flow values are arranged in ascending order (see table
below). The power corresponding to each flow values are
calculated assuming the head (=15 m) to be constant. Then, FDC
and power duration curves are plotted on the same graph.
n = number of records ; m = number of times flow exceeded or
1200 180000
Flow Power
170000
1100
160000
1000 150000
140000
900
Flow, m3/s
130000
Power, kW
800
120000
700 110000
100000
600
90000
500 80000
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0
Hydropower Engineering