Bailment
Bailment
Bailment
M Vijay Bhaskar
Assistant Professor
NLUO,
Cuttack
Meaning of Bailment
Bailment is a type contract where
the property of one person
temporarily goes into the
possession of another person.
Even if the possession of goods
changes the ownership remains
the same .
According 148 of the Indian Contract Act
bailment is the delivery of goods by one
person to another for some purpose, upon a
contract that they shall, when the purpose is
accomplished, be returned or otherwise
disposed of according to the directions of
the person delivering them. The person
delivering the goods is called the "bailor".
The person to whom they are delivered is
called the "bailee"..
Explanation to section 148
If a person already in possession of goods
of another contracts to hold them as a
bailee , he thereby becomes a bailee and
the owner becomes the bailor of such
goods, although they may not have been
delivered by way of bailment.
Duty of Bailee
Martin V London County Council 1947
Chellapan Pillai V Canara Bank 1988
Cheshire V Bailey 1905
Finder of Goods as a Bailee
As per section 71 of the Indian Contract
Act ,1872 a person who finds goods
belonging to another and takes them into
his custody is subject to same
responsibility as a bailee
As finder of goods is a bailee so he is also
bound by the duty of reasonable care
Duties of a Finder of Goods
Under Section 71 of the Contract Act, a finder of
goods has same duties with regards the goods found,
as that of a bailee. Hence,
1) Right of lien: A finder of goods has the right to keep the goods
in his possession till he is paid his expenses. He can exercise
the right of lien against the goods found. This right is available
against the true owner until the finder of goods . receives
compensation for expenses and trouble incurred by him is
finding out the true owner and in preserving the goods found.
However, he has no right to sue the real owner for such
compensation.
2) Right to sue for reward(sec 168) : If the true owner of goods
has declared some award for the return of lost goods, the finder
can sue the owner for such award. He will have the right of
lien, over the goods till he receives t he award.
Right of sale(Section 169 ): A finder of goods has a
right to sell the goods found by him under . the
following circumstances
1. Where the owner cannot, with reasonable
diligence, be found and if found, refuses to pay
the lawful charges of finder of goods, or
2. The goods found are such as is commonly the
subject of sale, or
3. The thing is in danger of perishing or of losing
the greater part of their value, or
4. When the lawful charges of the finder for
preservation and finding out the owner, amount to
two-thirds of the value of the thing.
Termination of Bailment
1. On the expiry of fixed 'period: If the goods are
bailed-for a fixed time,, the bailment is
terminated at the end of that period.
2. On the fulfillment of the object: If the goods
are bailed for some specific purpose or
purposes, the bailment is terminated on
fulfilling the object.
3. Inconsistent use of bailed: If the bailee uses
the goods in contravention of the terms of
bailment, the bailor may terminate the
bailment even before the term of bailment .
4) Destruction of the subject matter: A bailment is
terminated if the subject matter of the bailment is
destroyed or because of some change in the nature of
goods bailed if the goods become incapable of being
used for bailment.
5) Termination of gratuitous bailment: a gratuitous
bailment can be terminated by the bailor at any time
even though the bailment was for a fixed period or
purpose. But in such a case, the loss to be suffered by
the bailee from such premature termination should
not exceed the benefit he had derived from the
bailment. If the loss exceeds the benefit, the bailor
shall indemnify the bailee.
6) Death: A gratuitous bailment is terminated by the
death of either the bailor or the bailee.
Duty of Care : Sec 151 v Sec 152
Section 151 provides in all cases of
bailment the bailee is bound to take
as much care of the goods bailed to
him as a man of ordinary prudence
would under similar circumstances
take, of his own goods of the same
bulk, quality and value as the goods
bailed
Martin V London County Council 1947
KB 628