Assessment of Comprehensive

Development Plans (CDPs)

Bureau of Local Government Development

“Matino, Mahusay, at Maaasahan”

 Related Laws and Policies
• Republic Act No. 7160 – Local Government Code of 1991
• DILG-NEDA-DBM-DOF JMC No. 1, s. 2016 – Updated Guidelines
on the Harmonization of Local Planning, Investment
Programming, Resource Mobilization, Budgeting, Expenditure
Management, and Performance Monitoring and Coordination in
Fiscal Oversight
• DILG MC No. 2018-172 – Assessment of CDPs for Component
Cities and Municipalities
• DILG MC No. 2021-037 – Updated Guidelines on the Assessment
of CDPs of Cities and Municipalities
 Purpose of the Assessment
• Assess adherence of component cities and municipalities to the prescribed
CDP formulation guidelines and processes;
• Facilitate harmonization and alignment of national and local development
priorities, plans, and budgets;
• Emphasize the role of the Province in local development planning and as an
oversight partner of the national government;
• Strengthen the relationship of the Province and its component cities and
municipalities by facilitating plan complementation; and,
• Emphasize the use of local plans, specifically the CDP, as a parameter for
future qualification in the provision of performance-based grants and
incentives.
 Structure and Mechanism for Assessment

A. For Component Cities and Municipalities in the 15 Regions

CDP-TAC

PPDC (Chair); Provincial Department Heads or their

representatives; DILG Provincial Director or DILG Provincial
CDP Focal Person; CSO/PO representatives; regional line
Structure agency representatives

TACS

Staff from the PPDO

 Structure and Mechanism for Assessment

A. For Component Cities and Municipalities in the 15 Regions

Representatives from the concerned RLAs, CSOs, and/or

Academe are advised to be included as permanent members
Structure of the TAC
 Structure and Mechanism for Assessment

A. For Component Cities and Municipalities in the 15 Regions

Mechanism
 Structure and Mechanism for Assessment

B. For HUCs and ICCs in the 15 Regions

• Assessment structure and mechanism shall be guided by internal DILG

Memorandum dated 24 March 2021, Guidance on the Nationwide
Assessment of CDPs of HUCs and ICCs

• DILG ROs to:

– coordinate and strategize with NEDA counterparts to define the assessment
structure and mechanism for HUCs and ICCs
– Perform the necessary tasks to facilitate the review process depending on the
agreements with NEDA ROs/RDC
 Structure and Mechanism for Assessment

C. For LGUs in the NCR

shall be governed by specific guidelines to be issued by DILG NCR in
coordination with the Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA)

D. For LGUs in BARMM

• shall be governed by specific guidelines to be issued by MILG BARMM
• For ICC, the MILG BARMM shall facilitate the CDP assessment in
coordination with the Bangasamoro Planning and Development Authority
(BPDA)
Assessment Tool

Assessment of CDPs shall be undertaken using the Enhanced CDP

Assessment Tool/Checklist (BLGD CAT Form 1-B)

Assessment Cycle

CDP Assessment shall be undertaken every February to May of the ensuing

year after an election (i.e. 2023, 2026, etc.)
Parameters for Assessment

Form Process Content

 Completeness
 Consultative  Substance and logic
 Compliance to prescribed
 Participatory  Alignment with the PDPFP,
templates and documentary
 Inclusive PDIP, and CLUP
requirements
 Extent of institutional  Confirms how the technical
 Emphasis is put on documents
partnerships and consultations and scientific data pertaining
that reflect CCA and DRR
pursued during plan to CCA and DRR influenced
integration in the CDP
formulation the CDP process
Enhanced CDP Assessment Tool
Component I: FORM

“Matino, Mahusay, at Maaasahan”

• Component I looks into the
presence of required forms
or its equivalent alternative
and supporting planning
documents
Component I:
Form
Notes:
Column 1. List of required planning forms and
documents
Column 2a. Form number as identified in the
CDP Illustrative Guide (DILG, 2016)
Column 2b. Acceptable substitute/alternative
documents in lieu of the required
forms/documents
Column 3. Put a check () if corresponding
required or acceptable forms and
documents are present during the
assessment, otherwise put (x)
Column 4. Indicate comments or
observations relative to extent of
compliance, if any (e.g. alternative
document presented by the C/M)
1. Form 1b
Major activities:
• Team Mobilization
• Data gathering / updating
• Conduct of CDRA or any similar process
• CLUP Formulation*
• Medium-Term Comprehensive
Development Planning
• Finalization of Plans
• Plan Adoption and Approval

*If the timing of the CLUP and CDP

formulation does not coincide, the
C/MLGU may submit only the workplan
for the CDP formulation

Alternative: Workplan / Activity Design

 2. Form 1c
Five (5) development sectors – Social, Economic, Infrastructure,
Environment, and Institutional

To confirm the conduct of CDRA or related tool, the C/M can

attach any of the following as annexes to the CDP:
• RHEV maps from CLUP and/or CDRA or related
assessments
• Climate change projections
• Historical records of past disasters
• Technical results from CLUP and/or CDRA or related
assessments
• Other technical data produced

GHG Inventory

Alternative: Socio-Economic Profile (SEP), Socio-Economic and

Physical Profile (SEPP) or special sectoral studies subsumed in
the CLUP
3. Form 1d
Should contain indicators for the five development
sectors, broken down into barangays, districts or any
appropriate geographic scope within the LGU
jurisdiction.

Data must not be older than 10 years prior to year 1

of CDP scope (e.g., if CDP covers 2020, the data to
be used should be at least dated 2010.

Check presence of DRR-CCA indicators for each

development sector

Alternative: Narrative analysis on the three (3)

dimensions (sectoral, spatial, and temporal)
subsumed in the SEP, SEPP, or EP
 4. Form 2a
Should contain the long list of PPAs per five (5)
development sectors. This list will be the main
source of PPAs that will later be prioritized for
implementation (LDIP Stream 1).

Check if PPAs reflect DRR and CCAM intended

to reduce the risks and vulnerabilities of the
sectors

Alternative: any document reflecting the

identified PPAs may be accepted.
 5. Form 3b
Each project brief has the following information:
- Name and type of project
- Project components
- Estimated cost
- Justification of the project
- Target beneficiaries
- Target outputs or success indicators
- Possible risk or external factors
- Expected private sector response

Project briefs for PPAs with DRR and CCA objectives and for
PPAs to be funded by 5% LDRRMP will be required,
especially as they will also be subsequently tagged in the
LDIP and AIP.

Alternative: Project Profiles (title of the project, brief

description, project justification, location, cost,
beneficiaries, timeframe, and project proponent)
 6. Form 3a
Should contain prioritized PPAs which
resulted from a prioritization exercise

Documentation of the process or

workshop outputs of prioritization
exercise need to be presented to the
CDP-TAC.

For each development sector, there

should be a ranked list of PPAs.

Alternative:
- LDIP Summary Form (Form 3e) as
long as the sectoral PPAs are
ranked
- Workshop outputs of
prioritization exercises
7. Form 3c

Should contain the C/M’s projected local

revenue, expenditure and surplus for 3 years.

Check if the form is approved by the local

finance committee (LFC)

Alternative: any document/form containing 3-

year projections/forecast on total revenue,
expenditure, and surplus of the C/M may be
accepted
 8. Form 3e

Should contain priority PPAs to be

implemented within a period of 3 years.
Timeframe and years covered should
be indicated

Check if:
- LDIP followed the template (Form
3e) as prescribed in the DILG-
NEDA-DBM-DOF JMC 2016-01

Note: C/M should use the prescribed

LDIP summary Form (Form 3e). No
other document/form will be
accepted.
9. Form 4
Should follow the template (Form 4) as
prescribed in the DILG- NEDA-DBM-DOF JMC
2016-01

The annual climate change adaptation and

mitigation PPAs are tagged with corresponding
typologies as prescribed in the DBM- CCC-DILG
JMC 2015-01: Revised Guidelines for
Tagging/Tracking Climate Change Expenditures
in the Local Budget.

Note: C/M should use the prescribed AIP

summary Form (Form 4). No other
document/form will be accepted.
 10. Form 5a

Should contain capability building

interventions and development
strategies, programs, and initiatives,
desired outcome and implementation
details.

Alternative: Any document containing

capability building interventions and
development strategies, programs, and
initiatives may be accepted.
11. Form 5b

Should contain priority legislations/ local

ordinances that need to be enacted by the
C/M’s Sanggunian at a given timeframe; and the
committee responsible for the particular
legislative requirement

Check if identified legislations/local ordinances

support development priorities/strategies

Alternative: Any document containing the

priority legislations to support the
implementation of programs and projects may
be accepted.
 12. Form 6b

Should contain measures and parameters for the

proper assessment of development PPAs,
legislation, and CapDev implementation

More specifically, it should contain indicators to

be monitored, data sources, collection method,
frequency of collection, and responsible office

Alternative: Any document containing the M&E

strategy capturing measures and parameters for
proper assessment of PPAs, legislations, and
CapDev Implementation
Indicate number of forms
checked/presented
Documents
 Enhanced CDP Assessment Tool
Component II: PROCESS

“Matino, Mahusay, at Maaasahan”

 Component II: Process

• Extent of institutional partnership,

consultations, and linkages

• Ensures that planning is consultative,

participatory, and inclusive
 Component II: Process
This component looks into the proof of participatory meetings,
consultations, and workshops conducted as evidenced by the
following acceptable documents (any of the following):

• Copies of Resolutions by the council/committee

• Minutes of the meeting
• Post-activity reports
• Certified true copy of attendance sheets
…duly approved by the Mayor, C/MPDC, or any appropriate official or functionary

**Photographs not supported by documentation are not acceptable

proofs**
 What are the required preparatory and consultative
meetings, consultations, and workshops?

A. Preparatory Meetings

Meetings of Planning Team on Orientation, Tasking, Implementation

Strategies, and Scheduling of Activities

B. Meetings or Consultations of the LDC on the CDP preparation

1. EP validation
2. Project call – long list of PPAs
3. Prioritization of Projects
4. Approval of the CDP and LDIP
 What are the required preparatory and consultative
meetings, consultations, and workshops?

C. Meetings or Consultations of the City/Municipal with the PPDO

1. Provincial and C/M goals and strategies

2. PPAs and Investment programs

D. Meetings, Consultations, or Workshops with Sector Groups to

include NGOs and POs on CDP/LDIP (profiling, project call,
project prioritization, and approval)
1. Economic Sector 4. Institutional Sector
2. Social Sector 5. Physical/Infrastructure Sector
3. Environment Sector
 What are the required preparatory and consultative
meetings, consultations, and workshops?
E. Meetings, Consultations, or Workshops with Local Special
Bodies and Advisory Councils (profiling, project call, project
prioritization, and approval)

1. Local Finance Committee 6. Local Health Board

2. Peace and Order Council 7. C/MWRMC*
3. Local School Board 8. C/MFARMC*
4. LDRRMC 9. Youth Development Council
5. LSWMC 10. Others Advisory Council
and sectoral or functional
committee
 Important benchmarks to check:

1. Inclusion of DRR-CCA sector representative in the planning

structure
2. Participation of DRR-CCA sector in (i) data gathering for LDIS
and EP; (b) situation analysis (VRG, PSF); and (c) prioritization of
PPAs
3. Participation of NGO representatives in (i) data gathering for
LDIS and EP; (b) situation analysis (VRG, PSF); and (c)
prioritization of PPAs
 Important benchmarks to check:

C/M LGU to indicate if complementary activities

below were undertaken:

1. Consultation with the LDRRMC in the CDP Preparation

2. C/MLGU representative participated in any ecosystem-related
assessment
3. CDP TWG participated in CDRA

**C/M LGU may also indicate whether it has engaged institutional partners
Notes:
Column 1. List of required
Consultations/Agenda
Column 2. Put a check () if
consultation/agenda is conducted or delivered
Column 3. Indicate proof / document
presented
Column 4. Indicate comments or observations
relative to extent of compliance, if any
 Enhanced CDP Assessment Tool
Component III: CONTENT

“Matino, Mahusay, at Maaasahan”

 COMPONENT III: CONTENT

 Assesses substance and logic of the CDP with

emphasis on consistency, cohesiveness,
responsiveness, and comprehensiveness within
and across the chapters of the CDP

 Covers the following: (1) quality and (2)

alignment
 Enhanced CDP Assessment Tool
Component III: CONTENT

A. Quality
 A.Quality of Vision and Ecological Profile
VISION
 has both outward and inward looking perspective
 Contains element descriptors (5 development sectors) and
corresponding success indicators
 Risk-informed – considered the result of CDRA
1. Vision, goals and
GOALS
objectives are  Each development sector has goal statement/s
linked, long term,  Sectoral goals are based on the results of situational
strategic, and analysis – VRG, PSFM, map overlay analysis, etc.
 Goals focus on reduction, prevention and mitigation of
realistic climate and hazard risks and/or climate change adaptation/
mitigation
OBJECTIVES
 SMART
 Consistent with sectoral goals
 Can be attained within the planning timeframe of CLUP/CDP
 A.Quality of Vision and Ecological Profile

2. Comprehensive ECOLOGICAL PROFILE

Ecological Profile  Includes relevant and updated information and statistics
contains the ff. info: on the current status of the 5 development sectors
 Results of situational analysis (VRG, LDIS, PSFM) are
• Situational analysis/ discussed per sector/sub-sector in the EP
observed conditions  Includes existing sectoral PPAs and legislations,
accomplishments and issues – used as a take-off point
• Issues and concerns or
for analysis and determination of development strategies
unmet needs
• VRG analysis
 A.Quality of Vision and Ecological Profile
ECOLOGICAL PROFILE
Utilized the ff:
 Identification of vulnerable sectoral groups and dev’t
2. Comprehensive sectors
 Identification of fragile locations, such as barangays and
Ecological Profile districts
contains the ff. info:  Identification of natural hazards and climate change
stimuli
• Situational analysis/  Records of past disasters and their impacts
observed conditions  Results of other studies/tools: CBMS, DPA, Infra Audit,
• Issues and concerns or etc..
 Hazards and risks from sectoral studies
unmet needs  Risk assessment in CLUP
• VRG analysis  Location-specific sources of man-made hazards: dams, oil
depot, mining, etc…
 Technical and scientific mapping
 Climate change projections
 Ridge-to-reef information
 A.Quality of Vision and Ecological Profile

3. Expanded Problem EPSFM

Solution Finding  Reflects the concerns in item 2 above that are relevant to
the C/M.
Matrix (EPSFM)  If a PSFM is not used, findings must be processed to
contains Vulnerability enable the identification of corresponding PPAs and local
legislations
and Risk
assessments
 B. Quality of PPAs

PPAs
 Accomplished Form 2a per sector contains PPAs that
1. PPAs are responsive are responsive to issues and concerns resulting from
situational analysis
to the issues, problems,  Identified issues and concerns in the EP have
and gaps as made corresponding PPAs and/or legislations
 There is logical and consistent linkage between
evident in the ecological columns 1,2 and 3 of Form 1d and columns 1,2,3,
profile and LDIS and 4 of Form 2a.
 If using other format, check for the linkage of PPAs
with issues resulting from situational analysis
B. Quality of PPAs
 B. Quality of PPAs

PPAs would
1. PPAs are responsive
 Benefit any of the identified vulnerable groups
to the issues, problems,  Rehabilitate, upgrade, retrofit existing physical
and gaps as made infrastructure/ critical facilities
evident in the ecological  Rehabilitate the environment
profile and LDIS  Improve the delivery of basic services
 Directly target DRR and CCA issues
corresponding to the levels of risks and
vulnerabilities

CDP TAC can look at either the PSFM or Project Briefs

 B. Quality of PPAs

 All PPAs identified in Form 2a have corresponding

2. Every identified PPA project briefs
has corresponding  For PPAs with direct DRR and CCA objectives and
project brief for PPAs that are proposed to be funded out of the
LDRRMF, the project briefs must:
 Refer to the vulnerability and risk information
in the description/justification of the project
 Categorize the PPA as DRR, CCA or CCM type
 Have clear target vulnerable beneficiaries and
sectors
 Have quantifiable targets to determine if the
PPAs are contributing to risk reduction
 C. Quality of other implementation instruments (i.e. M&E,
CapDev Requirements, Legislation Requirements)

1. The proposed  the legislative measures

legislative measures addressing/supporting prioritized PPAs are
included in the Priority Legislative
support prioritized PPAs Requirements form (Form 5b)

 To assess Form 5b is DRR-CCA

mainstreamed, check if there are legislative
measures that address/support prioritized
DRR-CCA PPAs
 C. Quality of other implementation instruments (i.e. M&E,
CapDev Requirements, Legislation Requirements)

 Capdev programs addressing/supporting prioritized

2. The proposed PPAs are included in the CapDev Program
capacity development Summary Form (Form 5a)
programs support  To assess Form 5a is DRR-CCA mainstreamed,
prioritized PPAs check if there are CapDev Programs that
address/support prioritized DRR-CCA PPAs

 Capdev on DRR and CCA can involve building

technical capacities related to risk assessments,
conduct of GHG inventory, structural resilience,
disaster risk financing, response and rescue, and
recovery and rehabilitation, among others.
 C. Quality of other implementation instruments (i.e. M&E,
CapDev Requirements, Legislation Requirements)

 monitoring and evaluation strategy assessing

3. The proposed prioritized PPAs are included in the CapDev Program
M&E strategy Summary Form (Form 6b)
reflects the  PPAs with DRR and CCA objectives must adopt the
development quantitative data from the CDRA or related
indicators of assessments to determine project impacts on
reducing the vulnerability or risks in the C/M.
prioritized PPAs
 Monitoring of local critical infrastructures and critical
point facilities relies of construction supervision to
ensure that proper engineering designs and
standards are adopted during construction.
 Enhanced CDP Assessment Tool
Component III: CONTENT

B. Alignment
 A. Linkage and Consistency of the CDP and LDIP

 PPAs in Form 2a (Structured List of PPAs per Sector

1. The prioritization – Long List) are linked and contributory to the
process of PPAs attainment of the C/M’s Vision, Goals, and
Objectives
considers the vision,
goals and objectives  Prioritization tools utilized consider or give more
identified in the CDP weight to identified PPAs contributing to the
attainment of LGU’s vision, goals, and objectives
 If a GAM is undertaken, check whether PPAs
with DRR and CCA objectives were given high
priority. How many of the DRR and CCA
projects were prioritized?
 If only an Urgency Test was undertaken,
Documentation of the process or workshop determine the number of projects ranked
outputs of prioritization exercise need to be Urgent on account of their DRR and CCA
presented to the CDP-TAC
targets.
 A.Linkage and Consistency of the CDP and LDIP

 Prioritized PPAs reflected in Form 3e (LDIP

2. The LDIP PPAs
summary form) comes from Form 2a (Structured
are a subset of the List of PPAs per Sector – Long List)
structured list of  Determine the number of projects and/or the
PPAs subsumed in volume of resources programmed for PPAs with
the CDP DRR or CCA objectives, relative to the total
programmed funds. All these PPAs should be
properly tagged.
 B. Consistency of the LDIP

 PPAs that are multi-sectoral or will achieve more

1. PPAs that sectoral goals should have high scores/rates
contribute to more during the prioritization process
sectors or goals are
rated higher  Check:
 If a CCC or related tool has been undertaken,
PPAs with DRR and CCA objectives were found
to be complementary with other PPAs.
 If PPAs with multi-sectoral objectives were
identified as priorities.

Documentation of the process or workshop outputs of

prioritization exercise need to be presented to the CDP-
TAC
 B. Consistency of the LDIP

2. All prioritized projects  Check if PPAs in the LDIP have high rates/score
based on the result of prioritization exercise.
are those with the
highest scores  To assess if the LDIP is DRR-CCA mainstreamed,
check if
 Prioritized DRR-CCA PPAs are part of the LDIP
 The PPAs in the LDRRMIF (PPAs funded from
the 5% DRRMF) are included in the LDIP

Documentation of the process or workshop outputs of

prioritization exercise need to be presented to the
CDP-TAC
 B. Consistency of the LDIP

3. The number of  All PPAs identified in Form 2a (Structured List of

PPAs per Sector – Long List) should have
Project Briefs on hand corresponding project briefs.
are equal to the
 All PPAs with DRR and CCA objectives and all
number of Projects PPAs for LDRRMF must have project briefs.
listed
 B. Consistency of the LDIP

4. The New Development Investment  projected local revenue, expenditure and

Financing Potential for the Medium- surplus for three (3) years served as basis in
Term (3-years) is estimated and determining the new investment financing
provided including the following potential. (Total Revenue – Projected
supporting documents: Mandatory Expenditures = New Development
 Medium Term Local Revenue Investment Financing Potential)
Forecast (3-years);
 Medium-Term Forward Estimates  timeframe of the Form 3c (Projection of New
of Local Expenditures (3-years); Investment Financing Potential) is consistent
 Medium-Term Estimate of Debt with the LDIP
and Non-Debt Contractual
Obligations; and,  there is an increasing trend in the projected
 Estimation of Fiscal Surplus or revenues and consequently increasing
Deficit LDRRMF and the overall fund for more PPAs.
 B. Consistency of the LDIP

 Programmed amount in the 3-year LDIP is not

5. The Financing Plan more than the total resources as indicated in the
medium-term (3 year) financing plan for the
(3-years) is prepared same 3-year period
and provided and is
 Projected revenues indicated in the medium-term
consistent with the (3 year) financial plan are consistent with the
finalized LDIP and LRMP projected revenues as indicated in the LRMP for
for the same 3-year the same 3-year period
cycle.  there is an increasing trend in the projected
revenues and consequently increasing resources
for LDIP and LDRRMF and the overall fund for
more PPAs.
 B. Consistency of the LDIP

 PPAs in the AIP are consistent with the PPAs in

the LDIP
6. The Annual Investment  PPAs provided for Year t in the LDIP are also
Program for Year t is equal programmed in the AIP for Year t. This
represents an ideal LDIP
to the Local Development
Investment Program for To assess if the AIP is DRR-CCA mainstreamed,
Year t (The AIP is the check if:
 Prioritized DRR-CCA PPAs for Year t are part of
annual slice of the LDIP.) the AIP
 The PPAs in the LDRRMIF for Year t (PPAs funded
from the 5% DRRMF) are included in the AIP
 C. Alignment with CLUP, PDPFP and PDIP

1. The developmental strategy  CDP and CLUP have the same vision statement.
 Sectoral strategies of the CDP are consistent with
and programs of the the spatial development strategies of the CLUP
city/municipality are  PPAs identified in the CDP are not only sector-
focused but also considered spatial location
harmonized or consistent with  PPAs identified in the CLUP are considered in the
the CLUP. CDP PPA prioritization process
 Location of PPAs (especially infrastructure PPAs)
complements and is not in conflict with the land
use/zone regulations subsumed in the approved
ZO
Note:  Check if PPAs, especially infrastructure projects
Indicate in the “remarks” column if the CLUP and ZO
are for updating or outdated during the assessment
are not located within high-risk areas as
For details of location of PPAs, refer to respective identified in CLUP.
project brief
 C. Alignment with CLUP, PDPFP and PDIP

2. The vision, mission  Check if C/M’s outward-looking perspective in

their vision contributes to the attainment of
and goals of the the province’s vision, mission, and goals;
city/municipality are
aligned with the vision,  Note: Indicate in the “remarks” column if the
mission and goals of PDPFP is for updating or outdated during the
assessment
the Province as
provided in the PDPFP.  Check whether
 the ecoprofile recognizes the role of the LGU
in the ecosystem
 role of the LGU in the ecosystem considered
in it outward-looking element of the vision.
 C. Alignment with CLUP, PDPFP and PDIP

 Check if PPAs in the CDP are

3. The complementary and contribute to the
city/municipality’s PPAs attainment of the desired results or
in the CDP are aligned outcomes of the PPAs identified in the
with the PPAs of PDPFP.
Province’s PDPFP.
 Note: Indicate in the “remarks” column
if the PDPFP is for updating or outdated
during the assessment.

For details of PPAs, refer to respective

project brief
 C. Alignment with CLUP, PDPFP and PDIP

4. The LDIP of the city/  Check if PPAs in the LDIP are

municipality is supportive, reinforces and are not in
complementary to the conflict with, or do not duplicate any of
the PPAs identified in the PDIP.
PDIP.
 Note: Indicate in the “remarks” column
if the PDIP is for updating or outdated
during the assessment.

 For details of PPA, refer to project brief

 Important Considerations

 Results of CLUP and CDRA (or other similar tools) are integrated in the C/MLGU
information base (i.e., LDI, ecoprofile)
 Results of CDRA or other similar tools are used to enhance the C/MLGU situational
analysis (i.e., VRG/PSFM)
 Vision/goals/targets/ objectives/strategies from CDRA or related tool coincide
converge with the CDP and its implementation instruments
 Local Development Investment Program (LDIP) /Annual Investment Program (AIP)
for PPAs with DRR/CCA objectives exceed the 5% LDRRM Fund
 Monitoring and evaluation includes a system for meaningfully integrates resilience
(e.g., construction supervision of critical infrastructure)
Notes:
Column 1. List of required content / criteria for
assessment
Column 2. Put a check () if criteria is
attained
Column 3. Indicate comments or observations
relative to extent of compliance, if any
Component IV: Mainstreaming Concerns

“Matino, Mahusay, at Maaasahan”

 Guide Notes
Check if C/M’s descriptors and success indicators in the vision reflect
Vision
sectoral/thematic concerns
 EP have relevant and updated information and statistics on the concerned
sectoral/thematic concern(s)
Ecological Profile  If C/M utilized a particular analytical tool for a sectoral/thematic concern [e.g.
Climate and Disaster Risk Assessment (CDRA) for DRR-CCA], results should
be included in the ecological profile.
 Check if sectoral/thematic issues and concerns are included in the situational
analysis (e.g. LDIS and PSFM)
Situational Analysis  If C/M utilized a particular analytical tool for a sectoral/thematic concern [e.g.
CDRA, Participatory Rapid Appraisal (PRA)], results of it are included in the
situational analysis
Priority Legislative
Requirements  Check if regulatory measures addressing/supporting sectoral/thematic
concerns are included in the Priority Legislative Requirements form (Form 5b)
Reference: Form 5b
 Guide Notes
Long list of PPAs
Check if PPAs responsive to sectoral/thematic concerns and/or needs of
marginalized/vulnerable groups are included in the long list of PPAs (Form 2a)
Reference: Form 2a
LDIP Check if PPAs responsive to sectoral/thematic concerns and/or needs of
marginalized/vulnerable groups are included in the accomplished LDIP Form
Reference: Form 3e (Form 3e)
Priority Legislative
Requirements Check if regulatory measures addressing/supporting sectoral/thematic concerns
are included in the Priority Legislative Requirements form (Form 5b)
Reference: Form 5b
CDP Assessment Interpretation:
Mainstreaming of DRR-CCA

“Matino, Mahusay, at Maaasahan”

 Steps in Interpreting the CDP Assessment Results
to Determine if a CDP is risk-informed
1. Determine if the CDP is Disaster-Risk Sensitive
 Steps in Interpreting the CDP Assessment Results
to Determine if a CDP is risk-informed

1. Determine if the CDP is Disaster-Risk Sensitive

Based on satisfaction of the below-indicated parameters or criteria, the
assessment for disaster risk sensitive CDP shall be interpreted as follows:
Interpretation for Disaster Parameters
Risk Sensitive CDP
DRRM sector concerns are integrated into all of
Disaster Risk-Sensitive the seven (7) elements of the CDP
DRRM sector concerns are failed to be integrated
Partially Disaster Risk-Sensitive into at least one (1) of the seven (7) elements of
the CDP
DRRM sector concerns are not integrated into all
Not Disaster Risk-Sensitive of the seven (7) elements of the CDP
 Steps in Interpreting the CDP Assessment Results
to Determine if a CDP is risk-informed
2. Determine if the CDP is Climate Risk-Sensitive
 Steps in Interpreting the CDP Assessment Results
to Determine if a CDP is risk-informed
2. Determine if the CDP is Climate Risk-Sensitive
Based on satisfaction of the below-indicated parameters or criteria, the
assessment for climate risk sensitive CDP shall be interpreted as follows:
Interpretation for Climate Risk Parameters
Sensitive CDP
CCAM sector concerns are integrated into all of the seven
Climate Risk-Sensitive (7) elements of the CDP
CCAM sector concerns are failed to be integrated into at
Partially Climate Risk-Sensitive least one (1) of the seven (7) elements of the CDP

CCAM sector concerns are not integrated into all of the

Not Climate Risk-Sensitive seven (7) elements of the CDP
 Steps in Interpreting the CDP Assessment Results
to Determine if a CDP is risk-informed
3. CDP is Risk-Informed
Parameters Climate and Disaster Risk Overall Interpretation
Sensitivity Assessment
DRRM sector concerns are integrated in all of the Disaster Risk Sensitive Risk-Informed
seven (7) elements of the CDP and
and Climate Risk Sensitive
CCAM sector concerns are integrated into all of the
seven (7) elements of the CDP
DRRM sector concerns failed to be integrated in at Partially Disaster Risk Sensitive Partially-Risk Informed
least one (1) of the seven (7) elements of the CDP or
or Partially Climate Risk Sensitive
CCAM sector concerns failed to be integrated in at
least one (1) of the seven (7) elements of the CDP

DRRM sector concerns are not integrated in all of Not Disaster Risk Sensitive Not Risk-Informed
the seven (7) elements of the CDP and
and Not Climate Risk Sensitive
CCAM sector concerns are not integrated in all of
the seven (7) elements of the CDP.
Note: CDP Assessment shall yield the following determination:

1. CDP Compliance as to Form, Process, and Content

2. CDP Compliance as to Mainstreaming DRR-CCA
Thank you!

For more information:

Bureau of Local Government Development
Department of the Interior and Local Government
25th Floor, DILG-NAPOLCOM Center,
EDSA corner Quezon Avenue, West Triangle, Quezon City
Trunkline: (02) 876-3453 local 4102
Tel No. (02) 929-9235 / 927-7852
E-mail address: ldpd_blgd@yahoo.com