Roleplay is roleplay actually
Folks, sometimes I like to log onto a roleplay site in order to roleplay because I enjoy playing roles.
Among the many dickheads, there are some polite, interesting and creative people who want to collaborate on something fun and I am excited to approach them and to have them approach me but HOOOOO BOY are >90% of them not looking for roleplay.
Overall, I like these people. I respect their art, I enjoy their company and I try to compromise with them. They ask to plan scenes and that makes sense. They say they like to know about body language and other non-verbal cues. Me too! They talk about how they enjoy little insights that you wouldn't always get to hear when interacting with someone IRL. I like this too! They explain how context is fun for a story and establishing a scene and some surroundings adds to their fun! I'm happy to hear that as I feel the same way!
We then proceed to have wildly different opinions about how best to proceed. I'm aiming to put X words per hour into an INTERACTIVE series of posts. They are aiming to write one poetic piece of prose. They would prefer it if after an hour of "play" we've written 2 posts each and they are each of literary significance.
That's fine! I catch your drift! I thoroughly disagree that this is roleplay though.
Imagine watching a D&D series and seeing these professional improvisers get deep into character...and they pause intermittently and stroke their chins before giving five minute long monologues! I'm not saying it'd be bad, I bet there are people who could work wonders in that medium. Roleplay it fuckin ain't.
Everyone's going to be different so compromising and/or stepping out of your comfort zone will be good (if not essential) for creative collaboration. Presupposing one medium's superiority over another is not only not essential but is, in fact, FUCKING stupid. I'm sorry but when you come to me - a person looking for roleplay - and tell me you feel we should do multi-paragraph play that follows a pretty detailed plan, you're a sonnet-writer trying to collaborate with improv actor as if they're doing improv wrong. The purported classiness of your form does not invalidate the visceral immediacy of mine. Yours is a deep exploration of a person's soul. Mine feels like actually being a person. Yours is not "played" like a "role" and your connection is that of an author to their novel's protagonist. Mine is roleplay. I play a role like an actor plays a role or a TTRPG player plays a role or an improv comic plays a role.
This is not gatekeeping, it's semantics. If you like collaborative fiction, more power to ya. I'd love to read what you've written one day. In the meantime, if you want to experience interactive play where unexpected stuff happens, come and try Roleplay with me!
People keep talking to me as if what I enjoy doing is a lesser form of roleplay and their multi-paragraph version is what I should really be aspiring to! They imply, suggest or outright say that if I wrote more it'd be deeper.
When they say that it doesn't feel like deep roleplay without this...nah, mate. At this point, it just feels like a wild self-report about their inability to have meaningful relationships with people. So you're saying two-way, IRL-speed conversations where you can't read someone's mind or have all their body language described to you don't feel deep? When people reply to your first sentence before you've carefully planned and poetically delivered your desired three-to-four sentences, you find the interaction unsatisfying? I'm sorry to hear that. It must be a debilitating problem in your life! Please don't bring it to the place where I wanna have fun roleplaying.
If you tell me that your post where your character replies to mine, displays some body language, internally reacts to the pattern on the wallpaper, has a flashback to their childhood and then says something else is better than saying your first thing AND LETTING ME FUCKING REPLY TO IT LIKE HUMAN PEOPLE DO... then you are going to get a negative reaction. No, I won't agree to disagree! I'm sorry but you are not roleplaying and your attempt to gatekeep ME out of MY INTERACTIVE HOBBY while you do a completely different one in my space is not welcome. This is extra ridiculous because most collaborative fiction writers are completely welcome despite not really doing the whole roleplay thing...almost like being a judgemental arsehole or not is the main criterion for being welcome.
It's not like I'm turning down the opportunity to include body language, internal thoughts, background details or subconscious motivations. I just see them as tools to be used sparingly. At the end of the day, I love a long post from time to time. I like it when, at a moment where things need to be described in detail, they are described in detail. I also feel that, in roleplay, it's pretty rare for this to be necessary!
Is there not beauty in the unknown? Is there not verisimilitude in lively exchanges? Is brevity not the soul of wit? Does it not evoke your curiosity and engagement when a character in a film, play, rpg,etc. reveals themselves through their interactions with other characters? Do you not delight in having swift feedback on your character's words, actions or expressions? If not: ok...you're not looking for roleplay then! Depending on how much or how little you make that my problem: either fuck off entirely OR I wish you good luck in your creative journey!
To those people out there who I know will say "Wow, you can't write a multi-paragraph post in nice prose and do it quickly and interactively? Skill issue!" Yeah? Can't you write short, roleplay posts and make them interesting? Can't you express your character without a small essay? Can't you trust that a short post of yours gets its point across? I can! Maybe I don't have lesser skills but different skills! On the other hand, maybe it is a skill issue on my part. Unlike you, I'm not here to develop the skills of an author. I'm here to
ROLEPLAY