Not even close to the argument I’m making, which I agree is the facile “AI bad because Miyazaki said so.” While I understand the post’s sarcastic message, I still disagree with the baseline assumptions of that argument. The “added” context here is semantics, whether it is Miyazaki or Ghibli who is getting “ripped off,” it doesn’t matter because AI is incapable of creativity and collaboration. I have not brought up Miyazaki’s personal feelings on AI, though I’m very familiar with the clip in question (an excerpt from the 2013 documentary The Kingdom of Dreams and Madness). My argument is simply fundamentally anti-AI “art,” by explaining the role of the director in the animation pipeline and how it is something that ai is incapable of, while simultaneously attempting to demystify auteur theory as it is understood in academia as opposed to the meaning tumblr users have ascribed to it. You are officially engaged in a sky is orange argument.