Teehee 🦄
I'm curious. Reblog this if you know how to cook
I don’t even care if it’s macaroni, ramen or those little bowls you stick in the microwave. Please, I need reassurance that most of the population on tumblr WOULDN’T STARVE TO DEATH if their parents couldn’t fix them food or they couldn’t go out to eat.
Everyone listen tf up bc @worgbutch made a full (!!!!) 3 n a half (!!!!) minute animatic!!!!!!!!!
Everyone listen tf up bc @worgbutch made a full (!!!!) 3 n a half (!!!!) minute animatic!!!!!!!!!
Everyone listen tf up bc @worgbutch made a full (!!!!) 3 n a half (!!!!) minute animatic!!!!!!!!!
You don’t realize how good you have it til you lose institutional JSTOR access
well personally i like it when there’s incest and necrophilia and murder and cannibalism and abuse and torture and gore and mutilation and body horror and sexual depravity and death.
Are you fucking kidding me Joanne
It’s not so much her adoration of Nabakov’s writing style, which is indeed superlative. It’s the fact that she regards Lolita as a “tragic love story,” which shows an alarming lack of reading comprehension and an inability to apply a nuanced analysus of the text, which is a clearly horrifying series of events masked by flowery and passionate language.
Oh JFC, I decided to look this up to try and find its source, and apparently it goes all the way back to 2000. Dear fucking lord. This woman was writing the entire Harry Potter septology whilst thinking of Lolita as a ~tragic love story~. No wonder HP romanticizes so much fucked up shit.
Not “Only my reading of canon is correct” or “Interpretations are subjective and all valid” but a secret third thing, “More than one interpretation can be valid but there’s a reason your English teacher had you cite quotes and examples in your papers, you have to have a strong argument that your interpretation is actually supported by the text or it is just wrong and I’m fine with telling you it’s wrong, actually.”