Avatar

Jeremy Brett Fan

@loveforjeremybrett

Old lady of 58 ๐Ÿ˜…, incurable fan of Jeremy Brett, Sherlock Holmes! Whovian! Random gifs & photos I love to share.

On My Favorite Actor

I reposted a post yesterday that reminded me of my favorite actor, and I thought Iโ€™d talk about him a bit. ย Colin Jeavons is not a particularly well-known actor at this point, and even his best-known role (Inspector Lestrade in the Granada โ€˜Sherlock Holmesโ€™ series from the 1980s) tends to be overshadowed by the absolutely riveting portrayal of Sherlock Holmes himself by Jeremy Brett. ย Likewise, he was in the original โ€˜House of Cardsโ€™ miniseries, but was paired against Ian Richardson at his most mesmerizing. ย 

But the thing about Colin Jeavons is, whenever he was on screen, even with such amazing actors, he held his own, and heightened any scene he was in. ย And he did something even more than that. ย He took characters who tended to be disregarded and he changed the perception of them. ย His character in โ€˜House of Cards,โ€™ Tim Stamper, didnโ€™t even exist in the book the series was based on. ย He was created as a vehicle for exposition and to have someone for the main character, Francis Urquhart, to bounce off of for the television series. ย But his performance was so good and his character so gloriously awful that his character was written into the subsequent book. He turned a character created for convenience into one that was compelling enough for the author to change the next book to include him.

But perhaps the greatest example of this is โ€˜Sherlock Holmes.โ€™ ย I am a massive Holmes nerd and have been for decades. ย I inhaled the short stories and novellas in High School, and then branched out to every pastiche I could find. ย And of course, I found the โ€˜Sherlock Holmesโ€™ series from the โ€˜80s, and loved it as the most faithful adaptation of the short stories possible. ย The acting was excellent, and every character looked like theyโ€™d stepped out of the illustrations from the stories. ย It was incredible. ย 

The first time I watched the series, I was transfixed by Jeremy Brettโ€™s performance, as Iโ€™m sure most people were. ย But as I went back, watching again, I found myself more and more drawn to Colin Jeavonsโ€™ portrayal of Inspector Lestrade. ย In the stories, the character is essentially a plot point. ย Heโ€™s described as diligent, neat, and a little vain. He has a bit of a competition with Holmes, but also respects him a great deal, and Holmes respects Lestrade more than any of the other inspectors at Scotland Yard. ย Theirs is a relationship played, for the most part, in implications.

In High School, I missed those implications until I watched the series and saw Brett and Jeavons play opposite one another. ย Suddenly, Inspector Lestrade was infinitely interesting to me. ย He was proud, smart but not brilliant, stubborn, but also had great reticence taking credit for Holmesโ€™ accomplishments. ย His respect for Holmes came out in โ€˜The Six Napoleonsโ€™, in a scene in which Holmes (for the only time in the books and one of the very few in the series) is nearly brought to tears by Lestrade admitting that he was proud of Holmes. ย Itโ€™s a tense, lovely scene played carefully, with huge restraint by both actors, and itโ€™s my favorite scene in the entire series.

As I plowed through pastiches, I noticed something else. ย Those published before the Granada series tended to portray Lestrade as an idiot, a buffoon, or even actively malicious. ย He was an antagonist with relative frequency. ย But after 1985, this changed. ย Lestrade becomes more complex, more competent, a character in his own right rather than a roadblock or a bit of stupid comic relief.

I canโ€™t credit the writing of the Granada series with this. ย The series is essentially the short stories ripped to the screen. ย The pastiche writers had all these scenes before the Granada series in the original short stories, almost word for word. ย They were likely influenced by the Basil Rathbone movies, which also portrayed Lestrade as an idiot, so they, too, missed the more interesting implications in the writing. ย 

So the only conclusion I can draw is that Colin Jeavons, by taking the lines from the original stories and infusing them with his own ability to make a character compelling, changed the perception of Inspector Lestrade forever. ย In every subsequent adaptation, and in the majority of subsequent pastiches, the characterization is in part or in whole based on his portrayal. ย That portrayal has, in fact, been more or less accepted by the fandom as the canon interpretation.

He made Lestrade my favorite character in Holmes canon. ย He took relatively small, disregarded roles and turned them into something so compelling he could elevate scenes even with acting greats like Brett and Richardson. ย He is forever overlooked as an actor, but he will forever be my favorite actor.

Addendum: He also played a role in easily the most controversial episode of โ€˜The Avengersโ€™ (The Hellfire Club episode), which makes me happy, and he was hysterical in โ€˜Adam Adamant Lives!โ€™, the single most camp series ever created (ripped off wholesale by the creators of Austin Powers). ย He was one of the few villains who didnโ€™t die at the end of the episode, because they didnโ€™t have time to choreograph the fight scene, so it consisted of Adam chasing him around a room as he chucked potted plants at Adam. ย The actor playing Adam argued to the director that killing a character after he threw potted plants at him was just way too much overkill.

In summary: Colin Jeavons is one of the most influential actors youโ€™ve never heard of, and he also just had a WILD acting career, and I love him for that.

I love Colin Jeavons!ย 

I think you might like this book โ€“ "In and Out of Character (Limelight)" by Basil Rathbone.

Start reading it for free: https://a.co/8yC5C3s

Actor, war hero, twice British fencing champion, Military Intelligence Officer.... There is a lot more to Philip St. John Basil Rathbone MC. Read the book.

Lately, I've found it very difficult to get out of bed in the mornings. So I've come up with a plan. Here it is:

I made a not at all weird little cut-out of Holmes from the 'What is it, a fire?!' scene. I am going to put it up on the shelf next to my bed and put my phone behind it. When my alarm goes off, I will have to sit up to reach my phone. I will then have to look at cardboard Holmes and I will a) be so amazed by his beauty b) have a 'do it for him' moment c) be so baffled by my own silliness that I will immediately be wide awake and get out of bed. Wish me luck.

I have to remember to put him away before I receive any visitors though because I feel like this is the kind of thing where an I CAN EXPLAIN doesnโ€™t actually do anything to clarify the situation. Also Iโ€™m a coward

Ah and heโ€™s glued onto the back of a tofu package because thatโ€™s the only piece of cardboard I had

@nthattemptatit omg XD I should try to get a patent!

This is absolutely amazing and epitomises what I love about the internet and my own little corner of fandom, thank you for sharing the pure silliness.

It has reminded me of my school friend circa 2010 who had a life sized cardboard cutout of David Tennant/the Tenth Doctor blu tacked directly above her bed because she wanted to gaze up at him each night.

Until one night he fell down on top of her and she jumped out of her skin.

Magical Cardboard Holmes might not be able to launch himself onto my bed, but sometimes he slips down from the little box I placed him on:

"I followed you."

"I saw no one."

"That is what you may expect to see when I follow you."

I'm on holiday! :)) And I took Magical Cardboard Holmes with me because he did his job very well these past few weeks (months??), so he too deserves a change of air!

My darling friends @amypihcs, @tyrannosaurusnacks and I took Magical Cardboard Holmes to Italy!!!

(I also pinned my Letters from Watson pin to my hat so I never carried a Holmes without a Watson. Species-appropriate husbandry [haha]!)

As a fan of both Sherlock Holmes & Doctor Who, I love all of this! ๐Ÿฅฐ๐Ÿฅฐ

In honor of infamous opponent to human rights Anita Bryant finally croaking, let's remember that time Vincent Price told her to fuck off with that homophobic bullshit in an immaculately cultured, polite way. ๐Ÿซก

Vincent Price is still the GOAT! ๐Ÿฅฐ๐Ÿค˜

What the media won't show

Itโ€™s actually pretty nuts how there is no real mass media coverage of the protests that are happening all over the US. It demonstrates fairly conclusively that the unlawful activities at the White House arenโ€™t just limited to Trump. Thereโ€™s a lot of wealthy people in powerful positions in the US and around the world helping to support the dismantling of the US federal government.

the cultural reputation of Hawkeye Pierce is wild bc you'll see members of Gen X who grew up watching MASH and haven't revisited it since recall Hawkeye as a macho military man who constantly gets pussy and sticks it to the man but then you watch the show and he's a antiracist bisexual pansy who DESPISES the military, (who does still stick it to the man) hates guns and begs for men to get him pregnant

THIS ALSO HAPPENED TO MY FRIEND JIM KIRK!!!!

I'm Gen X, & I never thought Hawkeye was a macho military man. I was watching the show as it originally aired(I was born in 1966). I loved the show because I saw Hawkeye basically as you described him. He was sensitive, caring, & hated war. 50+ years later, I still watch it & it still holds up.

So I've been watching this new Watson show occasionally. I'm sort of bummed out by it because I was foolish enough to hope that it would be taking place in the original era and would really be focusing on John Watson as we know and love him. And instead it's set in the here and now which I always hate and he's a neurologist and there's all this stuff going on and it's a bummer. I think the bit that is the weirdest for me is how overwhelmingly heterosexual it is. Holmes once again has knocked up Irene Adler and Mrs. Hudson is some woman that he's having noisy sex with and oh God.

It feels as if the show is just terrified somebody somewhere somehow will think a homosexual thought so they have to banish it with constant heterosexuality.

I mean, I appreciate that all the actors are giving it their best and I think their choice of casting for Moriarty is very interesting and I applaud them for that, but overall it has nothing whatsoever to do with the Sherlock Holmes gestalt. I feel like it should really just be its own thing, but I guess they decided to slap some Sherlock Holmes in there to get a built-in viewership.

A show set in the correct era that really focused on Watson's years without Sherlock Holmes would have been vastly preferable.

Yes, I'm rambling.

Watson & Sherlock Holmes are a team. Like Batman & Robin. Starsky & Hutch. It doesn't really work otherwise. Though the BBC version was meh, I think Elementary is better, & the Granada series the best of all. So I won't be watching Watson without Holmes, or vice versa. โœŒ๏ธ

Condemn the First Felon and the lies.

America is not equipped to handle a malignant narcissist backed by another malignant narcissist threatening any Republican that steps out of line.

We need to step up our resistance game.

Call out the FASCISM!

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.