Avatar

@magpies-marble / magpies-marble.tumblr.com

Hi! This blog is mostly used for reblogs now, if you'd like to see any of my drawings/art/own posts you can find them on @jackdawsdrawings

The Magnus Protocol, episode 36 (Dylan Griggs and Alexander J Newall, 2025 CE)

The Frogs (Aristophanes, 405 BCE)

They’re huge??????????

Avatar
bitchcraftandfashion

That’s……a fucking WOMBAT?!?!

i thought wombats were small. That looks photoshopped!

That’s Patrick! A wombat raised since he was a joey on a wildlife park in Victoria, Aussie, he’s known as both the oldest and biggest wombat we know of!

Most wombats average around 30 to 40 inches, so fat Pat is definitely an outlier. For comparison here’s a more ‘regular’ wombat. 

dynamaxed

what if instead of having a fake name for internet personal-life purposes we could have a fake name for professional work-life purposes

fantasy culture where you have a different name for every role in your life and a true name that is extremely secret

you don't get to know all of me

it's tuesday you only get to know sara

you understand me to my soul

Honestly all the notes on this have been so good, here's a few of my favorites

the original got flagged with no way to appeal it when every contributor is deactivated but I will never let this post die. it's monday and we are getting on it cunts

gonna address this once that I believe any fan content is good content and should always be appreciated even if you personally don't agree with the artist's characterization of the character. because the characters are fiction. they are not real. any fan is allowed to interpret them however they want. the point of being in a fandom is to have fun. there's no "wrong" way of interpreting a character or the character's motive / intention. your interpretation of a character is valid, but so are other people's interpretations of the same character, even if they're different from yours. you can have your own interpretation and you can disagree with them, of course. but judging other fans / other artists and saying they "don't know the character" and/or implying they're not true fans — just because they don't share the same preference and/or interpretation of a character as you — will never sit right with me.

gonna address this once that I believe any fan content is good content and should always be appreciated even if you personally don't agree with the artist's characterization of the character. because the characters are fiction. they are not real. any fan is allowed to interpret them however they want. the point of being in a fandom is to have fun. there's no "wrong" way of interpreting a character or the character's motive / intention. your interpretation of a character is valid, but so are other people's interpretations of the same character, even if they're different from yours. you can have your own interpretation and you can disagree with them, of course. but judging other fans / other artists and saying they "don't know the character" and/or implying they're not true fans — just because they don't share the same preference and/or interpretation of a character as you — will never sit right with me.

gonna address this once that I believe any fan content is good content and should always be appreciated even if you personally don't agree with the artist's characterization of the character. because the characters are fiction. they are not real. any fan is allowed to interpret them however they want. the point of being in a fandom is to have fun. there's no "wrong" way of interpreting a character or the character's motive / intention. your interpretation of a character is valid, but so are other people's interpretations of the same character, even if they're different from yours. you can have your own interpretation and you can disagree with them, of course. but judging other fans / other artists and saying they "don't know the character" and/or implying they're not true fans — just because they don't share the same preference and/or interpretation of a character as you — will never sit right with me.

gonna address this once that I believe any fan content is good content and should always be appreciated even if you personally don't agree with the artist's characterization of the character. because the characters are fiction. they are not real. any fan is allowed to interpret them however they want. the point of being in a fandom is to have fun. there's no "wrong" way of interpreting a character or the character's motive / intention. your interpretation of a character is valid, but so are other people's interpretations of the same character, even if they're different from yours. you can have your own interpretation and you can disagree with them, of course. but judging other fans / other artists and saying they "don't know the character" and/or implying they're not true fans — just because they don't share the same preference and/or interpretation of a character as you — will never sit right with me.

gonna address this once that I believe any fan content is good content and should always be appreciated even if you personally don't agree with the artist's characterization of the character. because the characters are fiction. they are not real. any fan is allowed to interpret them however they want. the point of being in a fandom is to have fun. there's no "wrong" way of interpreting a character or the character's motive / intention. your interpretation of a character is valid, but so are other people's interpretations of the same character, even if they're different from yours. you can have your own interpretation and you can disagree with them, of course. but judging other fans / other artists and saying they "don't know the character" and/or implying they're not true fans — just because they don't share the same preference and/or interpretation of a character as you — will never sit right with me.

gonna address this once that I believe any fan content is good content and should always be appreciated even if you personally don't agree with the artist's characterization of the character. because the characters are fiction. they are not real. any fan is allowed to interpret them however they want. the point of being in a fandom is to have fun. there's no "wrong" way of interpreting a character or the character's motive / intention. your interpretation of a character is valid, but so are other people's interpretations of the same character, even if they're different from yours. you can have your own interpretation and you can disagree with them, of course. but judging other fans / other artists and saying they "don't know the character" and/or implying they're not true fans — just because they don't share the same preference and/or interpretation of a character as you — will never sit right with me.

gonna address this once that I believe any fan content is good content and should always be appreciated even if you personally don't agree with the artist's characterization of the character. because the characters are fiction. they are not real. any fan is allowed to interpret them however they want. the point of being in a fandom is to have fun. there's no "wrong" way of interpreting a character or the character's motive / intention. your interpretation of a character is valid, but so are other people's interpretations of the same character, even if they're different from yours. you can have your own interpretation and you can disagree with them, of course. but judging other fans / other artists and saying they "don't know the character" and/or implying they're not true fans — just because they don't share the same preference and/or interpretation of a character as you — will never sit right with me.

if house md were running in 2024 there would be an episode with a patient who identifies as an ‘online content creator’ (cagily) where house agrees to take the case primarily because when he offhandedly refers to her as an onlyfans model both cameron and cuddy get really offended and say it’s a sexist assumption so he doubles down and becomes committed to finding the patient’s onlyfans and proving it. at some point it would be revealed that chase actually is an onlyfans model and started doing it as a stopgap after his dad died and he suddenly got disinherited but he makes so much money off it that now medicine is basically just a hobby. cameron and foreman both disagree with the concept online sex work but it turns out they disagree for different reasons (cameron thinks it’s exploitative and not-feminist, foreman finds it distasteful and thinks people should get ‘real jobs’) and spend most of their scenes together arguing about this while chase gets continually more shifty. they break into the patient’s house and there’s a full ringlight and camera setup which seems to confirm house’s suspicions. while trying to find the patient’s onlyfans house accidentally finds chase’s onlyfans instead and considers publicly embarrassing him about it like he did with wilson’s sex tape but soon realises that most of the staff at the hospital are already subscribed to chase’s onlyfans so makes fun of him for that instead. it then transpires that the reason why the patient is so cagey about being a content creator is that she’s an ASMR artist and all the soap she’s been shaving on camera has irritated her lungs. cuddy is about to make house give her 20 extra hours of clinic duty as recompense but at last minute it’s revealed that the website the patient uses for some of her bonus commissions is, drumroll…onlyfans, because she’s been banned from patreon. how does house know this? wilson is subscribed to her because the soap videos sometimes soothe him to sleep. something by cigarettes after sex plays. roll end credits.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.