CHILD OF DUST AND ASHES

@maryasmorevna / maryasmorevna.tumblr.com

val || 30 || italy || [prev. harrowscore // lucy-ghoul // maddenedbythesstars]

"Vibes" are not a basis for justice. "Everyone thought he was creepy and weird so we should've known he was a serial killer" is a stupid as hell thing to say, lots of people seem creepy and weird to their neighbors and are just completely average people. Stop pushing narratives that kill people, especially neurodivergent people and men of color.

I've said it before but a lot of self-declared leftists on tumblr give off very strong "would join a lynch mob in a heartbeat" energy. Maybe because many of them have explicitly said they would join a lynch mob.

Avatar
Reblogged

One thing I've noticed about people who used to be progressive/leftist and did a heel turn to the right is that they were never the normal kind of leftist/progressive to begin with. They were always the most radical, deranged, nasty, no-nuance type of leftist, and that explains so much about why their minds became a breeding ground for right wing thought. The us versus them mentality. Politics based not on building a better society but on punishing the right type of people. Hate as a political motivator. But most important, it speaks on how exhausting it must have been for these people to live in their own heads during their "progressive" days. These are definitely the people who believe in thought crimes, and it makes you wonder if their heel turn is not some act of rebellion against the "SJW" cop in their heads, a way for them to allow themselves to think all the problematic thoughts they haven't yet deconstructed because it would've required for them to admit such problematic thoughts exist and their binary, purity based, mentality does not allow for that, leading to guilt and repression.

What do you think is the intended takeaway from Daenaerys' plotline/the Meereen plotline in ADWD? I can see the argument that Jon's plot (and to an extent the Dornish stuff) is about how peace is hard, emotionally unsatisfying, and involves dealing with some people you find abhorrent, but is ultimately the right thing to do compared to the easy path of going to war.

And I can see how it would be strange for Dany's plot to fly completely in the face of that.

But on the other hand the Sons of the Harpy and the Yunkish & allies are just so absolutely lacking in any redeeming features whatsoever that it's very hard to root for peace and reconciliation with them, especially when they kind of take the mick in what they ask for vs what they're willing to give in return. So I kind of hope that we aren't supposed to feel pained at their impending demise.

Avatar

The important thing here is that the moral of Jon's ADWD story cannot be imported wholesale over to Dany's.

Jon's trying to make a peace between two groups of people who both, basically, want to live. They have radically different ideas about the best way to do it and a mountain of grievances between them, but there's a fundamental commonality, too. They're all people and they're all staring down the winter alike. It's clear to the reader because it's clearest to Jon Snow - it is worth trying to bridge this gap and trying to pull together.

Dany, however, is not dealing with that sort of situation. She's got one group of people who wants to live. And also she has another whose entire goal is the exploitation and subjugation of others. Which cannot be compromised or reconciled in any way, shape, or form. As Dany comes to realise by the end of ADWD, there's no making peace with this, not without compromising the heart of what she set out to do in the first place.

I think the author will still leave us with a few questions about "how far is too far" when it comes to collateral damage, not to mention the inevitable point that there's no magic fix for the generations of violence that the slaving class started, but there's no peace with slavers either. Not a worthwhile one anyway.

This is a point where Jon's plot in ADWD and Dany's plot in ADWD are meant to be contrasted. Both are about the difficulties of making peace, yes... but Jon's is about where peace can and should be made despite the difficulties, and Dany's is where peace can't and shouldn't.

Avatar
You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.