One aspect of the perennial “I wish I was a farmer 300 years ago instead of having to answer emails” “no you don’t, that shit sucks” discourse that doesn’t get talked about quite so often is that half the fantasy isn’t about not having problems and stressors, it’s the fantasy of knowing how to deal with those problems and stressors.
Life comes at us fast now—and it came at us just as fast then, to be perfectly candid. But, for the most part crises in the past seem to us to be understandable, to be precedented. I’m sick. That plant isn’t growing enough. Taxes are too high. The sea peoples are raiding us. All bad, all far far worse than emails. But they were established, or rather, in hindsight they look established.
Surely, we imagine, a farmer in 1700 would look at [whatever problem is happening to them] and remember grandpapa talking about when [exactly this problem] happened to him and what he did about it, and from that, surely our 1700s farmer would know how to fix it! Which is much better than me, staring at my emails about [some unprecedented crazy modern bullshit] and not knowing how to respond!
This is of course just as much a fiction “everything was easy for subsistence farmers” thing, but unlike that one, basic historical fact isn’t enough to dispel it, partly because I’m sure that in the past as now there were plenty of people who did know what they were doing, (or at least were confident in whatever ridiculous answer they came up with) and partly because it’s much harder to know “how stressed each individual was about the crop failure” vs. “they starved or didn’t starve”
Basically, we’d do better if we engaged with this side of those fantasies as well, acknowledging the very legitimate place it comes from, instead of just debunking the easily disproven blatantly counterfactual side and acting like anyone who engages with such an attractive fantasy is de facto ignorant of historical realities.